Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Elek Imr
Elek Imr
By
Muhammad Amir Aizat Bin Suhaidi
Universiti Teknologi MARA Kampus Puncak Perdana, Shah Alam, Malaysia
INTRODUCTION
Customers are becoming more aware on the alternative on offer and rising standard of
service by competitive trends. It increases customer’s expectation. Customers are becoming
more critical of the quality of the service they experience. (Albrecht and Zemke, 1985)
Expectation are what they feel a service product should offer which are formed on the
previous experience with a company which includes physical evidence, proses and people
(Booms and Bitner, 1981). The physical environment prises facilitating goods. “Proses”
refers to service delivery system and “people’ comprises service personal both customer
contact and people who are integral to the production of the service.
Management to are more aware now of the customer’s needs and advances in
technology have enable organization to facilitated the customer company exchange at the
point of contact, for example ATM. These also have allowed management to implement
some customer oriented ideas which would impossible ten years ago.
They are known clear cut definition of quality. Many of the definition focus on
meeting customer needs and requirement. For example Louis and Bombs, (1983) believe that
service quality is a measure on how well the service level delivered matches customer’s
expectations. The terms “expectation” as used in service quality defers from the way it is
used in the customer’s satisfaction. In the satisfaction literature, “expectation” is viewed as
“prediction” made by the customers about what is likely to happen. In contrast the service
quality literature “expectation are viewed as desires of what consumers want. i.e. example
what they feel a service provider should offer rather than woods offers.
There dimension of service quality have been propose by Sasser et al. (1978). These
are levels of materials facilities and personal. Letinen and Lehtinen, (1982) suggest that
cooperate image/ quality is a dimension in its own right. They refer to three quality
dimension: physical quality, cooperate quality and interactive quality. Lehtinen and Lehtinen
also divide service quality into process two qualities – judged by consumers during the
service and output quality after the service is performed. Recently LeBlack and Nguyen
(1988) have suggested that cooperate image, internal organization physical support of the
service producing system, staff – customer’s interaction and degree customer satisfaction
contributed to service quality.
However, the most widely reported set of service quality determinants is that of
Parasuramant et al (1885). They suggested that the criteria used by consumers that are
important in moulding their expectation and perceptions of delivered service. There are five
dimension (Parasuramant et al, (1988).
In the business customers are extremely important. They are the ones that give you
income and revenue. The establishment of your business depends on them. The fact that
customers have a number of choices has to be face a significant among of competitions from
other companies doing the same things they may be providing products/services that very
similar to what you provide. For you to stand out from the crowd it is to provide outstanding
customer service. Since every company functions on different line you have to decide which
service strategy would best for your company.
CONCLUSION
It is hope that the review of customer service quality have provided the reader with a
flavour of the current service quality issues. The important of quality service is now well
accepted, and service – based organization are increasing their attention to service excellent
in their cooperate strategy and planning. This is a differential advantage over their
competitor. The most widely adopted instrument used the access service quality has been
presented together with a number of observation. Several modification and potential
improvement to these measurement procedures has been suggested but the proposed new
method has not yet been tested or shown to provide more accurate data in empirical studies.
REFERENCES
Albrecht, K. and Zemke, R. (1985), Service America: Doing Business in the New Economy, Dow
Jones- Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.
Blout, W.F. (1988), "AT&T Service: Quality & Renewal", AT&T Technology, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 2-7.
Booms, B.H. and Bitner, M.J. (1981), "Marketing Strategies and Organisational Structures for
Service Firms", in Donn
Leonard, F.S. and Sasser, W.E. (1982), "The Incline of Quality", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 60,
SeptemberOctober, pp. 163-71.
Lewis, R.C. and Booms, B.H. (1983), "The Marketing Aspects of Service Quality" in Berry, L.,
Shostack, G. and Upah, G. (Eds.), Emerging Perspectives on Services Marketing, American
Marketing Association, Chicago, pp. 99-104
Lehtinen, U. and Lehtinen, J.R. (1982), "Service Quality: A Study of Quality Dimensions'',
unpublished working paper, Helsinki: Service Management Institute, Finland