Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FM Ranking Analysts Awards 2018
FM Ranking Analysts Awards 2018
analysts
Marc Ter Mors: Leadership change in SA has boosted interest from global investors Russell Roberts
Hetty Zantman
Shamil Ismail: Transformation in SA’s investment sector is in urgent need of remedial action
465 analysts. We really need to put in some costs to their clients. Most com- Remember, the research will be
● Excluding those included as part remedial actions,” he says. mentators say they won’t be able procured and consumed only once
of teams, there were only 33 black The Association of Black Secu- to do so. Of those asset managers but felt across all or most under-
SA analysts individually ranked in rities & Investment Professionals who already pay for research sep- lying funds.”
2017 and only nine were black Stock Broking Think Tank, a sub- arately, 36.4% said they expensed it Adding research costs to their
Africans. structure of Absip, believes that the to their gross profit & loss, with the own profit & loss accounts will
● The proportion of black SA ana- response by local investment man- balance saying it formed part of further squeeze smaller assets
lysts increased from about 12% in agers to MiFID ll could further sup- fees charged to clients. managers — a factor that makes it
2014-2016 to 14.2% in 2017. press transformation. However, it Delphine Govender, speaking more difficult for small black
● Only 17 black analysts were rat- believes MiFID ll could be used “as on behalf of the Absib Stock- investment houses to establish
ed in the top six in their categories a unique opportunity to drive real broking Think Tank, says it is not themselves. Ter Mors says that is
(out of 240 available slots). change in the industry”. Absip is common practice to manage only a likely to result in them cutting the
● The proportion of female ana- hoping that the SA market single fund that can easily be deb- number of brokers they use to
lysts on the sell-side has remained responds in favour of the latter. ited and the costs applied distinctly regional specialists and interna-
stable at 18%-20%. This could be done by creating a to that account. “Many managers tional players, a trend already
Ismail says the findings are “dis- separate pool of allocations for will consume research whose noticeable in Europe and the UK.
turbing” and an indictment against black-owned and managed securi- benefits are hopefully felt across Ismail says local asset managers
the sell-side sector. “It is 2018 but ties firms in the industry. (See arti- the majority of funds under man- have already started trimming their
we still have sub-20% transforma- cle on page 10). agement and therefore the difficul- broker lists, limiting the number of
tion and that is something that A big issue for asset managers ty is to accurately apportion parties they pay research fees to.
needs to be considered carefully. is whether to pass on research research costs across all accounts. “And the more asset managers do
Hetty Zantman
Delphine Govender: Research costs across all accounts need to be accurately apportioned
that, the more attrition there will be we have a subscription model typ- competitive landscape. “We’d separately with specific fees for the
on the sell-side.” ically for smaller clients. MiFID expect regulators to be interested service; 12% said it should be pro-
Asset managers need the best won’t affect us that much — it in enhancing competition, not vided at no cost; and 6% said the
execution at the best price, as they could actually allow us to gain diminishing it.” broker should be compensated for
try to find the best deals for their traction with some clients.” Another issue that still needs facilitating the meeting.
clients, he says. “There’s no reason Ter Mors says it’s still too early sorting out is to separate out costs Ter Mors says another issue is
to pay 20 basis points when you to assess the financial impact of of corporate access, referring to the that as asset managers cut back on
could pay 10; there is already a MiFID within SA; it will play out practice of brokers arranging for the number of research houses
consistent downward trend in over the year. SBG has been sign- asset managers to visit or meet they use, it is also likely to reduce
rates. MiFID will separate the dis- ing product agreements, such as with executives from listed com- the coverage of small and medi-
cussion; the buy side will decide prepayments and other payments panies. While that was not part of um-cap stocks. Furthermore,
on the best rate of execution, then derived from service levels. MiFID, Ter Mors says it has instead of 20 analysts covering a
ask how much they are going to Having asset managers taking become an issue. “It’s still uncer- stock, it’ll probably come down to
pay for research. Research should on research costs could be disrup- tain how asset managers in the nine or 10. “That has consequences
be a fixed fee, it shouldn’t rise with tive to smaller research houses and MiFID regions are able to utilise for market efficiency and effective-
the size of a trade.” asset managers, he says. “The risk corporate access. Over the course ness over the long term. Maybe
Ismail founded Primaresearch of unintended consequences could of the year we’ll see how that there was overcapacity.
in 2015 aware of the pending reg- be that MiFID makes the larger solidifies.” “Much is still uncertain and it
ulations and making a dedicated firms stronger and the smaller Asked which they considered results in short-term pressures.
research house only, not a broker- ones weaker — both asset man- optimal, 62% of the 26 asset man- But it may be positive over time.
age. “We have a few ways that agers and research houses.” Should agers that responded said remu- MiFID facilitates research becom-
clients can pay us,” he says. “We this scenario play out in Europe, he neration for corporate access ing a proper own business over
have commission-sharing arrange- expects it to attract regulator inter- should be covered by brokerage; time. Price discovery will probably
ments, they can pay us directly and est in trying to establish a more 21% said it should be remunerated return once it’s all consolidated.” x
Creating a meaningfully sized, separate international banks and the BEE who are almost always unaffordable to
pool of research allocations for black- imperative is not as strong for them. If the small or midsized black-owned and
owned and managed securities firms is they want to they can easily fly managed securities firms where the
needed to address the racial imbalance someone in from London rather than majority of emerging black analysts are
in SA’s securities sector, says the develop an aspiring black employed. However, the scarcity of
Association of Black Securities & professional.” Another factor is the ranked black analysts is at the heart of
Investment Professionals (Absip) Stock high churn rate: top young analysts are the transformation imperative for SA. If
Broking Think Tank. highly sought after and are quick to investment managers do not allocate a
A demographic analysis of the 2017 move to where they get better portion of their research spend to
Financial Mail analyst rankings by remuneration, which undermines emerging or developing analysts from
Primaresearch on behalf of Absip transformation if analysts leave the previously disadvantaged
found that only 14% of sell-side sell-side for the buy-side. demographics, then it will be difficult
analysts were black. Noting an uptick in the number of for aspiring analysts to get sit-down
Absip deputy president Delphine black analysts in 2017 to 14% from time with buy-side portfolio managers
Govender says there have been about 11.5% in 2016, he says some since they are unlikely to be ranked.
previous attempts to create such a firms have attempted to address the This will have a dampening effect on
separate pool, but the Absip think tank issue. However, “this is typically in the investment research as a viable career
“feels that the total amount allocated in form of hiring junior analysts and option for many black graduates.”
those instances has been too small to partnering them with a well-rated, Marc Ter Mors, head of equities
include most black firms and to make a experienced analyst, and seeing if they research at Standard Bank/SBG,
meaningful difference across the make it through. When you analyse the outlines the danger of a possible
industry. Thus, black firms are still very data you can see the high number of application of a MiFID-type approach
limited in attracting senior talent to research teams [as opposed to an in SA, which could create barriers for
work with and groom budding black individual]. Of course, that will push junior analysts to prove their value-add
analysts”. the transformation agenda, but we to investor clients, inadvertently also
An important factor would be need to look at how successful that hindering transformation initiatives in
ensuring that the competitive criteria model of partnering is. We need more the institutional research industry.
are appropriate for and specific to this research into that area, particularly to Because asset managers are likely to
pool. For example, she says, it would see if the junior partners make it cut back on the number of research
defeat the purpose and spirit if the through,” he says. houses they use, he says, they are
pool’s participants are expected to On the impact of European likely to continue with experienced
compete on their ability to provide regulations, known as the Markets in analysts and firms that they know well.
market-wide liquidity, which requires a Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) “MiFID may consolidate business only
large balance sheet which most black ll that separate research costs from to established sell-side firms.”
firms do not have. Neither should they execution costs, small black asset He says asset managers may
be rated on their ability to provide managers will struggle to take on the become more reluctant to take
research coverage on global stocks, as research costs themselves, but they meetings with junior analysts who do
Top young black firms are usually only locally will likely be forced to do so as it will not have the same scope and
analysts are situated. “Instead, in a collaborative be even more difficult to pass those experience.
highly sought effort between both black firms and costs on to their clients. Govender says MiFID can be used to
after and are buy-side investment managers, the Govender points out that when accelerate transformation in the sector.
quick to move competitive criteria must be fit for investment managers pay for research “Local investment managers’ response
to where they purpose.” from their own accounts rather than to MiFID II will either suppress
get better Shamil Ismail, head of passing the cost on to clients, it is transformation or be used as a unique
remuneration, Primaresearch, says there are various natural that they would want only the opportunity to drive real change in the
which factors that undermine transformation best value-adding research. “In the SA industry. Absip is hoping that the SA
undermines in the industry. “Part of the problem is context, the definition of best is market responds in favour of the
transformation that the sell-side is dominated by associated with top-ranked analysts latter.” x
GOLD MINING
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Adrian Hammond Standard Bank/SBG 21.0% 1 19.3% 1 18.7% 1 Standard Bank/SBG Securities 21.0% 2 17.8% 1 19.3%
Securities
2 Johann Steyn Citigroup Global Markets 17.4% 2 17.2% 2 14.5% 2 Citigroup Global Markets 17.5% 1 18.1% 2 14.9%
3 Derryn Maade HSBC Securities 14.5% 3 14.0% 4 10.6% 3 HSBC Securities 15.3% 3 14.5% 3 11.4%
4 Patrick Mann Deutsche Securities 9.6% 4 10.4% 6 9.6% 4 Nedgroup Securities 9.3% 4 10.8% 5 10.9%
5 Steven Friedman Renaissance Capital 9.1% n/a 7.3% 3 12.2% 5 Deutsche Securities 9.1% 6 10.0% 6 8.2%
6 Leon Esterhuizen & Arnold van Graan Nedgroup Securities 8.6% 6 9.8% 5 10.1% 6 Macquarie 8.8% 5 10.7% n/a 7.6%
n/a Yatish Chowthee Macquarie 8.5% 5 10.2% n/a 7.8% n/a Renaissance Capital 8.5% n/a 6.9% 3 11.4%
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 14 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 13
GENERAL MINING
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Johann Pretorius Renaissance Capital 23.8% 1 24.7% 1 20.3% 1 Renaissance Capital 22.8% 1 22.5% 1 19.6%
2 Tim Clark & Thabang Thlaku Standard Bank/SBG 17.5% 2 18.7% 2 18.4% 2 UBS SA 18.9% 3 18.0% 3 17.3%
Securities
3 Kieran Daly UBS SA 16.6% 4 14.6% 3 14.7% 3 Standard Bank/SBG Securities 17.7% 2 19.1% 2 18.5%
4 Brian Morgan, Menno Sanderse & RMB Morgan Stanley 14.8% 3 15.7% 4 13.9% 4 RMB Morgan Stanley 15.8% 4 16.7% 4 14.4%
David Prowse
5 David Pleming, Derryn Maade & HSBC Securities 8.6% 5 9.5% 5 8.9% 5 HSBC Securities 8.6% 5 9.6% 5 8.6%
Emma Townshend
6 Heath Jansen & James Benne Citigroup Global Markets 3.9% 6 3.6% n/a 4.3% 6 JPMorgan 4.8% 6 4.3% 6 6.3%
6 Dominic O’Kaneane & Fraser JPMorgan 3.9% n/a 3.5% 6 5.6%
Jamieson
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 18 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 14
INDUSTRIAL METALS
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Brian Morgan RMB Morgan Stanley 24.0% 1 22.1% 1 23.0% 1 RMB Morgan Stanley 23.3% 1 21.6% 1 22.0%
2 Tim Clark & Thabang Thlaku Standard Bank/SBG 21.1% 2 21.4% 2 21.0% 2 Standard Bank/SBG Securities 20.5% 2 20.9% 2 19.7%
Securities
3 Kabelo Moshesha & Johann Pretorius Renaissance Capital 17.9% 3 19.3% 3 16.5% 3 Renaissance Capital 18.6% 3 19.6% 3 16.8%
4 Kieran Daly UBS SA 10.2% 5 10.2% 4 9.4% 4 UBS SA 9.7% 5 9.8% 4 8.7%
5 David Pleming, Derryn Maade & HSBC Securities 8.2% 4 10.9% 5 8.2% 5 HSBC Securities 8.3% 4 10.9% 5 8.1%
Emma Townshend
6 Wade Napier Avior Capital Markets 4.5% n/a 3.0% n/a 4.0% 6 Avior Capital Markets 4.7% n/a 3.0% n/a 4.0%
n/a Heath Jansen & James Benne Citigroup Global Markets 3.7% n/a 3.7% 6 4.8% n/a JPMorgan 3.1% n/a 1.9% 6 6.1%
n/a Noluthando Zulu Vunani Securities 2.4% 6 4.1% n/a 1.4% n/a Vunani Securities 2.5% 6 4.2% n/a 1.4%
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 14 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 14
BANKS
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Stephan Potgieter UBS SA 27.0% 1 26.4% 1 22.1% 1 UBS SA 26.5% 1 26.2% 1 20.9%
2 Henry Hall HSBC Securities 20.6% 2 19.4% 3 15.7% 2 HSBC Securities 19.8% 2 18.5% 3 13.4%
3 Stefan Swanepoel Deutsche Securities 14.9% 3 14.4% 2 18.9% 3 Deutsche Securities 14.3% 3 13.7% 2 17.5%
4 Ilan Stermer Renaissance Capital 10.2% 4 10.4% 5 8.0% 4 Renaissance Capital 10.0% 4 10.5% n/a 7.0%
5 Charles Russell Citigroup Global Markets 7.4% 5 7.2% 4 9.0% 5 Citigroup Global Markets 8.0% 6 7.9% 5 8.2%
6 Harry Botha Avior Capital Markets 5.1% 6 6.5% 6 6.2% 6 Avior Capital Markets 6.9% 5 8.3% 4 8.9%
n/a RMB Morgan Stanley 4.8% n/a 4.5% 6 7.4%
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 14 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 12
INSURANCE
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Michael Christelis UBS SA 27.1% 1 27.2% 1 23.8% 1 UBS SA 26.9% 1 27.4% 2 21.7%
2 Francois du Toit Renaissance Capital 23.0% 2 19.7% 2 21.2% 2 Renaissance Capital 23.6% 2 20.3% 1 21.9%
3 Larissa van Deventer Deutsche Securities 19.5% 3 17.8% 3 18.3% 3 Deutsche Securities 19.3% 3 17.3% 3 17.5%
4 Grant Davids Nedgroup Securities 11.8% 4 15.4% 4 10.6% 4 Nedgroup Securities 9.7% 4 13.1% 6 8.6%
5 Musa Malwandla Standard Bank/SBG 7.2% 5 8.3% 5 8.6% 5 Standard Bank/SBG Securities 8.0% 5 9.2% 4 9.7%
Securities
6 Warwick Bam Avior Capital Markets 5.1% 6 5.3% 6 7.4% 6 Avior Capital Markets 5.7% 6 5.9% 5 8.9%
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 13 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 9
FOOD PRODUCERS
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Vikhyat Sharma RMB Morgan Stanley 23.2% 1 25.5% 1 22.2% 1 RMB Morgan Stanley 24.0% 1 25.7% 1 22.4%
2 Robyn Collins Renaissance Capital 18.8% 2 17.7% 2 16.3% 2 Renaissance Capital 17.2% 2 16.7% 2 13.7%
3 Jiten Bechoo & Deidre Scholtz Avior Capital Markets 13.9% 5 11.7% 4 12.2% 3 Avior Capital Markets 13.6% 5 11.6% 4 12.6%
4 Caron Bramwell Deutsche Securities 12.6% 4 11.9% 3 14.3% 4 Standard Bank/SBG Securities 12.9% 3 13.8% 4 12.6%
5 Sumil Seeraj Standard Bank/SBG 11.5% 3 12.7% 5 10.6% 5 Deutsche Securities 12.6% 4 11.8% 2 13.7%
Securities
6 Stephen Carro & Dino JPMorgan 6.9% n/a 5.3% 6 10.4% 6 JPMorgan 7.3% n/a 5.4% 6 10.9%
Constantinou
n/a Kgosi Rahube Citigroup Global Markets 6.1% 6 6.1% n/a 5.2% n/a Citigroup Global Markets 5.2% 6 5.7% n/a 4.7%
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 14 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 14
GENERAL RETAILERS
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Sean Holmes Deutsche Securities 23.6% 1 24.0% 1 23.7% 1 Deutsche Securities 22.2% 1 22.5% 1 20.1%
2 Jeanine Womersley HSBC Securities 19.7% 2 20.7% 2 14.6% 2 HSBC Securities 18.6% 2 20.0% 2 13.3%
3 Shamil Ismail Primaresearch 14.5% 3 15.6% 3 12.5% 3 Primaresearch 13.3% 3 14.4% 3 11.2%
4 Rod Salmon, Thaule Masemola Absa Capital 10.0% 4 8.9% 5 8.1% 4 Absa Capital 11.1% 4 9.9% 6 9.2%
& Samantha Naicker
5 Stephen Carro & Dino Con- JPMorgan 9.6% 5 8.5% 4 10.7% 5 JPMorgan 9.1% 5 7.9% 5 10.1%
stantinou
6 Kaeleen Brown Standard Bank/SBG 6.9% 6 5.5% 5 8.1% 6 Standard Bank/SBG Securities 8.5% 6 7.1% 4 10.8%
Securities
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 14 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 14
DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIALS
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Rowan Goeller Macquarie 18.0% 1 17.1% 2 15.6% 1 Macquarie 17.2% 1 16.1% 1 13.6%
2 Brent Madel Renaissance Capital 16.2% 2 15.4% 1 16.0% 2 HSBC Securities 15.4% 2 14.5% 4 10.9%
3 Nick Webster HSBC Securities 15.1% 3 14.5% 4 11.3% 3 Renaissance Capital 13.0% 4 12.2% 2 13.4%
4 Kwame Antwi UBS SA 12.6% 4 13.5% 3 12.6% 4 UBS SA 12.2% 3 13.7% 3 12.5%
5 Roy Campbell & Bradley Able RMB Morgan Stanley 7.5% 5 8.3% 5 9.3% 5 RMB Morgan Stanley 8.7% 5 9.7% 4 10.9%
6 Munira Kharva Deutsche Securities 6.5% 6 6.7% 6 7.7% 6 Deutsche Securities 7.8% 6 8.2% 6 8.7%
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 18 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 17
MEDIA
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 David Ferguson Renaissance Capital 14.5% 1 18.0% 1 14.2% 1 Renaissance Capital 18.2% 1 20.9% 1 15.3%
2 John Kim Deutsche Securities 14.1% 2 12.6% 3 12.5% 2 Avior Capital Markets 13.1% 2 13.4% 2 13.1%
3 John Paul Davids JPMorgan 11.4% n/a 9.0% 6 9.0% 3 HSBC Securities 12.9% 3 12.7% n/a 8.2%
4 Kevin Maison, Charl Wolmarans & Richard Avior Capital Markets 11.0% 4 11.8% 5 12.0% 4 Standard Bank/SBG 11.2% 5 10.8% 2 13.1%
Tessendorf Securities
5 David Smith, Maddy Singh & Andrea Ferraz RMB Morgan Stanley 10.7% 3 12.4% 2 12.8% 4 Deutsche Securities 11.2% 6 10.5% 5 10.7%
6 Jonathan Kennedy-Good Standard Bank/SBG 10.1% n/a 9.0% 4 12.3% 6 RMB Morgan Stanley 9.8% 4 11.5% 4 11.7%
Securities
n/a Chris Grundberg UBS SA 9.8% 5 10.6% n/a 7.9% n/a JPMorgan 8.9% n/a 6.5% 6 9.3%
n/a Ziyad Joosub HSBC Securities 9.7% 6 9.7% n/a 7.9%
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 13 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 13
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Jonathan Kennedy-Good Standard Bank/SBG 26.2% 1 27.3% 1 24.0% 1 Standard Bank/SBG 26.7% 1 27.9% 1 25.2%
Securities Securities
2 Chris Grundberg UBS SA 15.2% 2 15.2% 3 12.6% 2 JP Morgan 15.5% 3 13.1% 2 14.8%
3 John Paul Davids JPMorgan 15.0% 3 13.1% 2 14.0% 3 UBS SA 15.0% 2 14.9% 3 12.3%
4 Mike Gresty Citigroup Global 12.1% 5 11.9% 5 10.3% 4 Citigroup Global Markets 11.6% 5 11.5% 5 9.5%
Markets
5 Maddy Singh RMB Morgan Stanley 10.6% 4 12.8% 4 12.1% 5 RMB Morgan Stanley 10.6% 4 12.5% 4 11.6%
6 John Kim Deutsche Securities 10.0% 6 9.4% 6 9.3% 6 Deutsche Securities 9.1% 6 9.0% 6 8.9%
n/a Macquarie 6.1% n/a 6.8% 6 8.9%
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 14 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 13
COMMODITIES
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Tom Price, Susan Bates, Christopher RMB Morgan Stanley 15.8% 1 18.0% 2 13.8% 1 RMB Morgan Stanley 15.8% 1 17.5% 2 14.9%
Nicholson, Brian Morgan & Menno
Sanderse
2 Mahew Turner, Vikas Dwivedi, Ger- Macquarie 15.6% 3 15.4% 3 16.3% 2 UBS SA 14.7% 3 13.4% 1 15.4%
hard Engelbrecht & Yatish Chowthee
3 Kieran Daly, Lachlan Shaw, Myles UBS SA 14.7% 4 13.7% 1 13.7% 3 Macquarie 13.7% 4 13.3% 3 12.6%
Allsop, Daniel Morgan & Glynn
Lawcock
4 Heath Jansen, Ed Morse, Johann Citigroup Global Markets 11.0% 2 15.5% 6 9.7% 4 Citigroup Global Markets 11.5% 2 16.5% 5 10.4%
Steyn & James Benne
5 Tim Clark, Thabang Thlaku, Leroy Standard Bank/SBG 10.6% 5 9.2% 4 13.1% 5 Standard Bank/SBG Securities 10.8% 5 9.5% 4 12.3%
Mnguni, Tom Kendall & Marcus Securities
Garvey
6 Johann Pretorius, Steven Friedman, Renaissance Capital 9.2% 6 8.7% 5 10.2% 6 Renaissance Capital 9.7% 6 8.4% 6 9.5%
Kabelo Moshesha & Siphelele
Mhlongo
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 16 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 13
CREDIT ANALYSIS
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Kate Rushton Absa Capital 31.7% 1 30.3% 1 30.2% 1 Absa Capital 33.7% 1 34.3% 1 32.7%
2 Elena Ilkova Rand Merchant Bank 25.2% 2 25.9% 3 23.3% 2 Rand Merchant Bank 24.4% 2 25.1% 3 20.8%
3 Robin MacLennan, Steffen Standard Bank/SBG 20.2% 3 21.2% 2 23.7% 3 Standard Bank/SBG Securities 19.1% 3 18.1% 2 22.8%
Kriel & Varushka Singh Securities
4 Jones Gondo Nedgroup Securities 11.3% 4 12.2% 4 9.4% 4 Nedgroup Securities 8.6% 4 9.8% 5 4.5%
5 Rene Prinsloo & Petrus Avior Capital Markets 6.1% 5 6.2% 5 7.8% 5 Avior Capital Markets 5.5% 5 5.2% 4 6.4%
Bosman
6 Min Dai, Simon Waever & RMB Morgan Stanley 2.0% 6 2.1% n/a 0.8% 6 RMB Morgan Stanley 2.4% 6 2.6% n/a 1.0%
James Lord
n/a Adriaan du Toit Citigroup Global Markets 1.6% n/a 1.3% 6 1.6% n/a Citigroup Global Markets 1.9% n/a 1.7% n/a 2.0%
n/a Danelee Masia & Sebastian Deutsche Securities 0.4% n/a 0.4% 6 1.6% n/a JPMorgan 1.9% n/a 0.8% 6 3.0%
Barker
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 10 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 12
DERIVATIVES
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Petrus Bosman, Shivaan Avior Capital Markets 21.2% 2 19.8% 1 26.3% 1 Avior Capital Markets 21.6% 2 20.2% 1 27.5%
Gurayah & Mark Sarembock
2 Chris Craddock, Daniel Prescient Securities 20.4% 3 18.2% 2 18.4% 2 Prescient Securities 20.2% 3 18.0% 2 17.5%
Polakow, Odwa Sihlobo &
Gideon van der Linde
3 Florence Chikurunhe, Emlyn Peregrine Securities 19.6% 1 24.9% 3 16.8% 3 Peregrine Securities 19.4% 1 24.6% 3 15.9%
Flint & Anthony Seymour
4 Constellation Team Constellation Capital 7.2% n/a 4.6% 4 10.6% 4 Constellation Capital 11.4% 4 8.2% 4 15.3%
5 Aveshen Pillay UBS SA 7.0% 6 6.1% 6 5.6% 5 UBS SA 6.9% n/a 6.0% 6 5.3%
6 John Cairns Rand Merchant Bank 6.3% 4 7.3% 5 7.8% 6 Rand Merchant Bank 6.2% 5 7.2% 5 7.4%
n/a Logan Neels & Mpho Mergence Africa Capital 5.8% 5 6.7% n/a 2.8% n/a Mergence Africa Capital 5.7% 6 6.6% n/a 2.6%
Mokgoro
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 13 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 12
FIXED-INTEREST SECURITIES
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Walter de Wet Nedgroup Securities. Stan- 20.5% 2 21.5% 1 22.1% 1 Absa Capital 19.2% 1 22.7% 2 16.4%
dard Bank/SBG Securities
2 Mike Keenan Absa Capital 19.6% 1 23.3% 2 18.5% 2 Nedgroup Securities 18.9% 3 15.0% 1 18.8%
3 Mary Curtis, Andrea Masia RMB Morgan Stanley 14.6% 5 9.9% 3 12.9% 3 RMB Morgan Stanley 15.3% 4 12.3% 3 13.3%
& Min Dai
4 Neels Heyneke & Mehul Nedgroup Securities 11.2% 3 11.8% 4 10.0% 4 Standard Bank/SBG Securities 12.1% 2 16.5% 4 11.3%
Daya
5 Adriaan du Toit Citigroup Global Markets 9.9% 4 10.2% 5 8.8% 5 Citigroup Global Markets 9.2% 5 10.3% 5 8.6%
6 Rene Prinsloo & Petrus Avior Capital Markets 5.8% 6 5.8% 6 8.0% 6 Avior Capital Markets 7.1% 6 9.1% 6 8.2%
Bosman
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 15 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 13
INVESTMENT STRATEGY
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Mary Curtis RMB Morgan Stanley 27.2% 1 26.8% 1 25.9% 1 RMB Morgan Stanley 27.2% 1 26.6% 1 24.5%
2 Deanne Gordon & Adele Standard Bank/SBG 22.3% 2 24.6% 2 19.9% 2 Standard Bank/SBG Securities 21.6% 2 24.4% 2 18.4%
Fermoyle Securities
3 Ayan Ghosh, Mislav Matejka JPMorgan 10.3% 3 9.3% 3 11.0% 3 JPMorgan 10.5% 3 9.8% 3 12.1%
& Jan Loeys
4 Robert Buckland, Richard Citigroup Global Markets 7.2% 5 7.3% 5 5.2% 4 Citigroup Global Markets 7.5% 5 7.4% 6 5.2%
Schellbach & Markus Rosgen
5 Neels Heyneke & Mehul Daya Nedgroup Securities 5.9% 4 7.9% 6 4.9% 5 Nedgroup Securities 6.5% 4 8.5% 5 6.3%
6 John Morris Bank of America Merrill 5.1% n/a 5.0% 6 4.9% 5 Deutsche Securities 6.5% 6 6.7% 4 7.5%
Lynch
n/a Sebastian Raedler, Jim Reid, Deutsche Securities 4.6% 6 5.4% n/a 4.0% 6 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 5.3% n/a 5.1% n/a 4.9%
David Bianco, Binky Chadha
& Yuliang Chang
n/a Elfreda Jonker Deutsche Securities 3.7% n/a 3.0% 4 5.5%
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 20 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 18
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Josiah Rudolph & Gurvinder Macquarie 23.8% 1 24.3% 1 25.4% 1 Macquarie 24.0% 1 24.1% 1 24.5%
Brar
2 Daniel Polakow, Odwa Prescient Securities 17.2% 2 19.9% 2 14.5% 2 Prescient Securities 16.6% 2 19.5% 2 13.5%
Sihlobo, Gideon van der
Linde & Nico Katzke
3 Florence Chikurunhe, Emlyn Peregrine Securities 14.4% 4 13.1% 3 13.5% 3 Peregrine Securities 14.1% 4 13.0% 3 13.0%
Flint & Anthony Seymour
4 Warrick Erlank, Petrus Avior Capital Markets 13.6% 3 13.2% 4 13.0% 4 Avior Capital Markets 13.3% 3 13.1% 4 12.5%
Bosman & Mark Sarembock
5 Ayan Ghosh, Viquar Shaikh & JPMorgan 12.6% 5 11.5% 5 10.4% 5 JPMorgan 12.9% 5 12.0% 5 12.0%
Robert Smith
6 James Murray & Chris Citigroup Global Markets 9.1% 6 8.0% 6 7.3% 6 Citigroup Global Markets 8.9% 6 7.9% 6 7.0%
Montagu
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 13 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 13
RISK MANAGEMENT
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Odwa Sihlobo, Gideon van Prescient Securities 25.4% 1 23.9% 1 18.8% 1 Prescient Securities 24.7% 1 23.1% 1 17.1%
der Linde & Daniel Polakow
2 Petrus Bosman & team Avior Capital Markets 17.9% 3 15.5% 2 16.7% 2 Avior Capital Markets 17.4% 3 15.0% 2 15.2%
3 Florence Chikurunhe, Emlyn Peregrine Securities 10.4% 1 23.9% 3 12.5% 3 Peregrine Securities 10.1% 1 23.1% 4 11.4%
Flint & Anthony Seymour
4 Neels Heyneke Nedgroup Securities 8.6% n/a 2.0% n/a 5.2% 4 JPMorgan 9.3% 5 9.6% 3 12.4%
5 Ayan Ghosh & Mislav Matejka JPMorgan 8.4% 5 8.4% 5 9.4% 5 Nedgroup Securities 8.4% n/a 1.9% n/a 4.8%
6 Tricia Lunenburg Legae Securities 6.9% n/a 1.6% n/a 4.2% 6 Legae Securities 6.7% n/a 1.5% n/a 3.8%
n/a Willem Buiter, David Lubin, Citigroup Global Markets 6.3% 4 14.3% 6 6.3% n/a Citigroup Global Markets 6.2% 4 13.8% n/a 5.7%
David Cowan, Tina Fordham,
Gina Schoeman,
Adriaan du Toit & team
n/a Mary Curtis & Jonathan RMB Morgan Stanley 3.7% 6 4.0% 4 10.4% n/a Standard Bank/SBG Securities 4.2% n/a 3.1% 6 7.6%
Garner
n/a RMB Morgan Stanley 3.7% 6 3.8% 5 9.5%
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 12 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 12
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
ANALYSTS’ RANKING FIRMS’ RANKING
Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of Weighted by commission % of AUM % of Unweighted % of
votes weighted votes votes votes weighted votes votes
1 Neels Heyneke Nedgroup Securities 32.7% 1 35.7% 1 31.8% 1 Nedgroup Securities 34.6% 1 36.4% 1 33.6%
2 Tricia Lunenburg Legae Securities 21.1% 4 14.7% 2 20.6% 2 Absa Capital 18.1% 2 17.3% 2 19.0%
3 Judy Padayachee Absa Capital 17.0% 3 16.9% 3 17.8% 3 Legae Securities 16.2% 4 12.6% 3 14.7%
4 Costa Perdikis Lefika Securities 15.2% 2 17.5% 4 14.0% 4 Lefika Securities 15.4% 2 17.3% 4 12.9%
5 Colin Aylward, Ian Doyle & RMB Morgan Stanley 4.6% 6 4.1% 5 5.6% 5 RMB Morgan Stanley 4.7% 6 4.1% 6 5.2%
Mary Curtis
6 Stephen Arnold Investec Securities 3.9% 5 5.9% n/a 2.8% 6 Investec Securities 3.9% 5 5.8% n/a 2.6%
n/a Ayan Ghosh JPMorgan 1.3% n/a 1.0% 6 4.7% n/a JPMorgan 2.4% n/a 1.8% 5 7.8%
Number of analysts who got one or more votes: 9 Number of firms which got one or more votes: 9