Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf) For Teachers

You might also like

Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

For Teachers

Name of Employee : CRISTINE C. SALVA Name of Rater: DAVID S. PALMA


Position : TEACHER 1 Position: SCHOOL HEAD
Bureau/Center/Service/Division : STO. NIÑO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/MARILOG DIST. Date of Review: APRIL 27,2015
Rating Period : 2014-2015

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight
per KRA ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
RESULTS
40%

Prepared 180 lesson plans/daily log of activities


5
with five parts based on the budget of work.

Prepared 170 lesson plans/daily log of activities


4
with four parts based on the budget of work.

· Prepared daily lesson plans


Basic Education I. Teaching- and daily log of activities with five Prepared 160 lesson plans/daily log of activities
I.1 June-March 20% 3 4 0.8
Policy Services Learning Process parts based on the approved with three parts based on the budget of work.
budget of work.
Prepared 150 lesson plans/daily log of activities
2
with two parts based on the budget of work.

Prepared 140 and below lesson plans/daily log


1 of activities with one part based on the budget of
work.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.

4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.


· Facilitated reading
intervention program using 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators.
Basic Education I. Teaching- reading strategies/tools running
I.2 June-March 10% 3 0.3
Policy Services Learning Process records/LIP materials, lesson
plan/SLE, activity sheets, reading
passages, books (small/big)
· Facilitated reading
intervention program using
Basic Education I. Teaching- reading strategies/tools running
I.2 June-March 10% 3 0.3
Policy Services Learning Process records/LIP materials, lesson
plan/SLE, activity sheets, reading 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
passages, books (small/big)

1 Has 1 or none of the identified indicators.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.

· Implemented classroom 4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.


rules and guidelines by providing
Basic Education I. Teaching- School CPP Handbook, Guidance
I.3 June-March 5% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators. 3 0.15
Policy Services Learning Process Record, behavior charts, Report
Card, and list of classroom rules
and regulations 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.

1 Has 1 or none of the identified indicators.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.

· Monitored attendance,
4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.
cleanliness, and orderliness of
classrooms by accomplishing SF1
Basic Education I. Teaching-
I.4 and Report Card, assigning June-March 5% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators. 4 0.2
Policy Services Learning Process
individual/group daily tasks,
posting list of classroom officers, 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
and providing bulletin board

1 Has 1 or none of the identified indicators.

Weight
per KRA ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
RESULTS
20%
Administered reading assessment to 90% and
5
above of the class within the rating period.

Administered reading assessment to 89-80%


4
and above of the class within the rating period.

Administered reading assessment to 79-70%


3
* Administered reading and above of the class within the rating period.
Basic Education II. Pupils July and
II.1 assessment 90% of the class 5% 3 0.15
Policy Services Outcomes
within the rating period. February
* Administered reading
Basic Education II. Pupils July and
II.1 assessment 90% of the class 5% 3 0.15
Policy Services Outcomes
within the rating period. February
Administered reading assessment to 69-60%
2
and above of the class within the rating period.

Administered reading assessment to 59% and


1
below of the class within the rating period.

Has conducted remedial instruction to 5 or more


5
academically slow learners.

Has conducted remedial instruction to 4


4
academically slow learners.
· Conducted remedial
Basic Education II. Pupils instruction weekly to 5 Has conducted remedial instruction to 3
II.2 June-March 5% 3 4 0.2
Policy Services Outcomes academically slow learners based academically slow learners.
on the assessment result.
Has conducted remedial instruction to 2
2
academically slow learners.

Has conducted remedial instruction to 1 or none


1
academically slow learner.

5 Has 9-10 of the identified indicators.

4 Has 7-8 of the identified indicators.


· Maintained updated pupils'
record by accomplishing SF1,
Basic Education II. Pupils SF2, SF3, Form 137, Form 138,
II.3 June-March 5% 3 Has 5-6 of the identified indicators. 5 0.25
Policy Services Outcomes Composite/Grading Sheet,
Nutritional Status, FCR, Class
Reading Profile, Pupils Portfolio 2 Has 3-4 of the identified indicators.

1 Has 1-2 or none of the identified indicators.

5 GSA increased by 10% and above

4 GSA increased by 100 %

· Increased FCR result by


Basic Education II. Pupils
II.4 10% from the baseline to June-March 5% 4 0.2
3 GSA increased by 70-79%
· Increased FCR result by
Basic Education II. Pupils
II.4 10% from the baseline to June-March 5% 4 0.2
Policy Services Outcomes
achievement.
2 GSA increased by 60-69%

1 GSA increased by 59% and below

Weight
per KRA ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
RESULTS
30%

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.

Conducted periodic PTA 4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.


meetings/ conferences at least
once every grading period with
Basic Education III. Community
III.1 accomplished indicators, such as June-March 10% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators. 5 0.5
Policy Services Involvement
attendance sheet, agenda of the
meeting, minutes of the meeting,
pictorials, narrative report. 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.

1 Has 1 or none of the identified indicators.

Has conductedhome visitation to 90- 100% of


5
pupils needing academic monitoring/follow-up.

Has conductedhome visitation to 80-89% of


4
pupils needing academic monitoring/follow-up.

Conducted home visitation to


Basic Education III. Community Has conductedhome visitation to 70-79% of
III.2 100% of pupils needing academic June-March 5% 3 3 0.15
Policy Services Involvement
monitoring/follow-up.
pupils needing academic monitoring/follow-up.

Has conductedhome visitation to 60-69% of


2
pupils needing academic monitoring/follow-up.

Has conductedhome visitation to 59% and below


1
of pupils needing academic monitoring/follow-up.
Project/event/activity accomplishment with full
5 documentation report of completion duly
approved by the HRPTA officers

Undertaken/ Initiated project/ 4


Project/event/activity accomplishment with full
event/ activity with documentation report of completion
Basic Education III. Community
III.3 HRPTA/PTA/internal and external June-March 5% 5 0.25
Policy Services Involvement
stakeholders funding/ Project/event/activity accomplishment with
3
sponsorship in a year. partial documentation report of completion

Project/event/activity accomplishment with no


2
documentation report of completion

1 No initiated Project/event/activity

Participated 4 or more events/activities in the


5
community within the rating period.

Participated 3 events/activities in the community


4
within the rating period.
Participated 4 events/activities in
Basic Education III. Community
III.4 the community within the rating June-March 10% Participated 2 or more events/activities in the 5 0.5
Policy Services Involvement
period.
3
community within the rating period.

Participated 1 or more events/activities in the


2
community within the rating period.

No participated events/activities in the


1
community within the rating period.

Weight
per KRA ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
RESULTS
10%

Conducted action research and published in the


5
District's Official Journal .

Conducted action research with full


4 documentation and duly signed by the Division
TWG.
IV. Professional Conducted classroom- based
Basic Education
Growth and IV.1 Action Research within the rating June-March 5% Conducted action research with full 4 0.2
Policy Services Development period. 3 documentation and duly signed by the District
TWG.

Conducted action research with partial


2 documentation and duly signed by the District
TWG

1 No action research conducted


Initiated and participated 2 or more co-curricular
5
activities within the year

Initiated and participated 1 co-curricular activity


4
IV. Professional Initiated and participated 2 co- within the year
Basic Education
Growth and IV.2 curricular activities within the June-March 2% Participated 2 or more co-curricular activities 4 0.08
Policy Services Development year.
3
within the year.

Participated 1 co-curricular activity within the


2
year.

1 No participation of co-curricular activity

Produced publication/ creative work published in


5 National Circulation/DepEd Post/ CSC
Newsletters and similar publications.

Produced publication/ creative work published in


IV. Professional 4
Basic Education Produced a publication/ creative regional publications.
Growth and IV.3 June-March 1% 1 0.01
Policy Services Development
work for school papers in a year.
Produced publication/ creative work published in
3
division publication.

2 Produced publication/ creative work published in


school papers.
1 Unpublished work produced.

Received 4 or more special awards/ citations/


5
recognitions.

Received 3 special awards/ citations/


4
recognitions.
IV. Professional · Received special
Basic Education Received 2 special awards/ citations/
Growth and IV.4 awards/citation/ recognition for June-March 2% 3
recognitions. 1 0.02
Policy Services Development exemplary performance in a year.
2 Received 1 special award/ citation/ recognition.

1 No special award/citation/recognition received.

OVERALL RATING FOR


* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned. ACCOMPLISHMENTS VERY SATISFACTORY
58 3.96

DAVID S. PALMA CRISTINE C. SALVA HELEN D. PAGUICAN, CESO V

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

Schools Division Superintendent


INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
For Master Teachers

Name of Employee : Name of Rater: CHERYL M. LAGANG


Position : Position: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL 1
Bureau/Center/Service/Division : GEN. ROXAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Date of Review:
Rating Period : 2014-2015
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA RATING SCORE
30% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.


·        Conducted action
research related to
classroom
problems/concerns within 4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.
the rating period,
I. Professional supported with the ff.
Basic Education October-
Growth and I.1 Evidences; Research 10% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators.
Policy Services November
Development Workshop output, action
research paper, certificate
of completion, proposed 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
learning interventions,
proposed M&E for
results/outcomes Has 1 or none of the identified
1 indicators.

Participated at least 4 or more


5 seminar-workshops/trainings
within the rating period.
Participated at least 3 seminar-
4 workshops/trainings within the
rating period.
·         Attended/Participated
I. Professional Participated at least 2 seminar-
Basic Education 4 seminar-
Growth and I.2 June-March 5% 3 workshops/trainings within the
Policy Services workshops/trainings within rating period.
Development
the rating period.
·         Attended/Participated
I. Professional
Basic Education 4 seminar-
Growth and I.2 June-March 5%
Policy Services workshops/trainings within
Development
the rating period.
Participated at least 1 seminar-
2 workshop/training within the rating
period.

No seminar-workshops/trainings
1 attended.

Received award/recognition in
5 national level within the rating
period.

Received award/recognition in
4 Regional level within the rating
period.
·        Received
I. Professional award/recognition in Received award/recognition in
Basic Education 3 division level within the rating
Growth and I.3 national, region, division, June-March 5%
Policy Services period.
Development district, school level within
the rating period. Received award/recognition in
2 district level within the rating
period.

Received award/recognition in
1 school level within the rating
period.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.


·          Served as
demonstration teacher 4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.
within the school year as
I. Professional evidenced by; LP duly 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators.
Basic Education
Growth and I.4 signed by the critique June-March 5%
Policy Services
Development panel, pictorials, training 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
matrix, certificate of
recognition, attendance
sheet Has 1 or none of the identified
1 indicators.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.

·          Served as
facilitator/resource person
in trainings/seminar- 4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.
workshops within the
I. Professional
Basic Education school year as evidenced
Growth and I.5 June-March 5%
Policy Services by; SLE duly signed by the 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators.
Development
critique panel, pictorials,
training matrix, certificate
of recognition, attendance
sheet
in trainings/seminar-
workshops within the
I. Professional
Basic Education school year as evidenced
Growth and I.5 June-March 5%
Policy Services by; SLE duly signed by the
Development
critique panel, pictorials,
training matrix, certificate
of recognition, attendance 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
sheet
Has 1 or none of the identified
1
indicators.

Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS


MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA RATING SCORE
35% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.
Has 360 or more minutes of actual
5 teaching loads
Has 350-359 minutes of actual
·         Handled 360 minutes 4 teaching loads
of actual teaching loads as
Basic Education II. Instructional Has 340-349 minutes of actual
II.1 reflected in the class June-March 15% 3
Policy Services Competence teaching loads
program of activities and Has 330-339 minutes of actual
SF7. 2 teaching loads
Has 329 or less minutes of actual
1 teaching loads
Increased achievement test by 5%
5 or more over baseline test.

Increased achievement test by 4%


4 or more over baseline test.

·          Increased achievement


Basic Education II. Instructional Increased achievement test by 3%
II.2 test by 5% over baseline June-March 10% 3
Services Competence or more over baseline test.
test results.
Increased achievement test by 2%
2 or more over baseline test.

Increased achievement test by 1%


1 or less over baseline test.

Increased instructional and


5 independent readers by 50% or
more in the posttest .

Increased instructional and


4 independent readers by 40-49% in
the posttest .
·          Increased the number
of instructional & Increased instructional and
Basic Education II. Instructional July and
II.2 independent readers in the 5% 3 independent readers by30-39% in
Services Competence February the posttest .
posttest from the pretest by
50%.
·          Increased the number
of instructional &
Basic Education II. Instructional July and
II.2 independent readers in the 5%
Services Competence February
posttest from the pretest by
50%.
Increased instructional and
2 independent readers by 20-29% or
more in the posttest .

Increased instructional and


1 independent readers by 19% or less
in the posttest .

Attained 75% and above required


5 competencies in a given period of
time.

Attained 70-74% required


4 competencies in a given period of
time.
·      Attained 75% of the
Basic Education II. Instructional Attained 65-69-% required
required learning July-March 5%
Services II.3 3 competencies in a given period of
Competence competencies in a given time.
period of time.
Attained 60-64% required
2 competencies in a given period of
time.

Attained 59% and below required


1 competencies in a given period of
time.

Increased NAT MPS by 10% or


5 more.
4 Increased NAT MPS by 8-9%.
·         Increased NAT MPS by
Basic Education II. Instructional
II.4 10% from the previous March 5% 3 Increased NAT MPS by 6-7%.
Services Competence
year. 2 Increased NAT MPS by 4-5%.

1 Increased NAT MPS by 3% or less.

Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS


MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA RATING SCORE
30% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.

Conducted mentoring/coaching to
5 4 or more teachers in the
school/cluster/line.

Conducted mentoring/coaching to
4 3 teachers in the
school/cluster/line.
Conducted
III. Support to
Basic Education mentoring/coaching to 4
Instructional III.1 June-March 10%
Policy Services teachers in the
Supervision
school/cluster/line.
Conducted
III. Support to
Basic Education mentoring/coaching to 4
Instructional III.1 June-March 10% Conducted mentoring/coaching to
Policy Services teachers in the 3 2 teachers in the
Supervision
school/cluster/line. school/cluster/line.

Conducted mentoring/coaching to
2 1 teacher in the school/cluster/line.

No teacher conducted
1 mentoring/coaching.

Managed/Monitored 5 or more
5 teachers in the implementation of
the RPMS cycle.

Managed/Monitored 4 teachers in
4 the implementation of the RPMS
cycle.
Managed/Monitored 5
III. Support to teachers in the Managed/Monitored 3 teachers in
Basic Education
Instructional III.2 implementation of the July-April 10% 3 the implementation of the RPMS
Policy Services cycle.
Supervision RPMS cycle within the
rating period.
Managed/Monitored 2 teachers in
2 the implementation of the RPMS
cycle.

Managed/Monitored 1 or none
1 teacher in the implementation of
the RPMS cycle.

Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book


5 to 5 or more teachers
Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book
4 to 4 teachers.
III. Support to Checked daily Lesson
Basic Education Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book
Instructional III.3 Plans/Journals/Log book June-March 10% 3
Policy Services to 3 teachers.
Supervision to 5 teachers.
Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book
2 to 2 teachers.
Checked daily LP/Journal/Log book
1 to 1 or none teacher.

Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS


MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA RATING SCORE
5% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.
Participated 4 or more
5 events/activities in the community
within the rating period.

Participated 3 events/activities in
4 the community within the rating
period.

Participated 4
Basic Education IV. Community events/activities in the Participated 2 or more
IV.1 June-March 2% 3 events/activities in the community
Policy Services Involvement community within the within the rating period.
rating period.
Participated 1 or more
2 events/activities in the community
within the rating period.

No participated events/activities in
1 the community within the rating
period.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.

Conducted periodic PTA


meetings/ conferences at 4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.
least once every grading
period with accomplished
Basic Education IV. Community
IV.2 indicators, such as June-March 3% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators.
Policy Services Involvement
attendance sheet, agenda of
the meeting, minutes of the
2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
meeting, pictorials,
narrative report.
Has 1 or none of the identified
1 indicators.

Produced publication/ creative


work published in National
5 Circulation/DepEd Post/ CSC
Newsletters and similar
publications.

Produced publication/ creative


IV. Professional Produced a publication/ 4 work published in regional
Basic Education publications.
Growth and IV.3 creative work for school June-March
Policy Services
Development papers in a year.
IV. Professional Produced a publication/
Basic Education
Growth and IV.3 creative work for school June-March
Policy Services
Development papers in a year. Produced publication/ creative
3 work published in division
publication.

2 Produced publication/ creative


work published in school papers.
1 Unpublished work produced.

Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS


MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA RATING SCORE
40% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.
Initiated district
activity/contest/conference with
full documentation

Initiated district
activity/contest/conference with
partial documentation
* Inititiated District
Basic Education activity/contest/conference to Initiated district
Policy Services Plus Factor support the delivery of activity/contest/conference
instruction. without documentation

Initiated district
activity/contest/conference
without documentation

No initiated district
activity/contest/conferences.

OVERALL RATING FOR


* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned. ACCOMPLISHMENTS

CHERYL M. LAGANG ________________________________


Rater Ratee Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
For Master Teachers

Name of Employee : Name of Rater: CHERYL M. LAGANG


Position : Position: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL 1
Bureau/Center/Service/Division : GEN. ROXAS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Date of Review:
Rating Period : 2014-2015
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE RATING SCORE
30% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.

·        Conducted action research


5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.
related to classroom
problems/concerns within the 4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.
rating period, supported with
I. Professional
Basic Education the ff. Evidences; Research October-
Growth and I.1 10% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators.
Policy Services Workshop output, action November
Development
research paper, certificate of 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
completion, proposed learning
interventions, proposed M&E for Has 1 or none of the identified
1 indicators.
results/outcomes
Participated at least 4 or more
5 seminar-workshops/trainings
within the rating period.

Participated at least 3 seminar-


4 workshops/trainings within the
rating period.
I. Professional ·         Attended/Participated 4
Basic Education
Growth and I.2 seminar-workshops/trainings June-March 5% Participated at least 2 seminar-
Policy Services 3 workshops/trainings within the
Development within the rating period.
rating period.

Participated at least 1 seminar-


2 workshop/training within the
rating period.
Development within the rating period.

No seminar-workshops/trainings
1 attended.

Received award/recognition in
5 national level within the rating
period.

Received award/recognition in
4 Regional level within the rating
period.
·        Received award/recognition
I. Professional Received award/recognition in
Basic Education in national, region, division,
Growth and I.3 June-March 5% 3 division level within the rating
Policy Services district, school level within the period.
Development
rating period.
Received award/recognition in
2 district level within the rating
period.

Received award/recognition in
1 school level within the rating
period.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.

·          Served as demonstration 4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.


teacher within the school year
I. Professional
Basic Education as evidenced by; LP duly signed
Growth and I.4 June-March 5% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators.
Policy Services by the critique panel, pictorials,
Development
training matrix, certificate of 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
recognition, attendance sheet
Has 1 or none of the identified
1 indicators.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.


·          Served as
facilitator/resource person in 4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.
trainings/seminar-workshops
I. Professional
Basic Education within the school year as
Growth and I.5 June-March 5% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators.
Policy Services evidenced by; SLE duly signed
Development
by the critique panel, pictorials, 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
training matrix, certificate of
recognition, attendance sheet Has 1 or none of the identified
1 indicators.

Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS


KRA
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE RATING SCORE
35% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.
Has 360 or more minutes of
5 actual teaching loads
Has 350-359 minutes of actual
4
·         Handled 360 minutes of teaching loads
Basic Education II. Instructional actual teaching loads as Has 340-349 minutes of actual
II.1 June-March 15% 3
Policy Services Competence reflected in the class program of teaching loads
activities and SF7. 2
Has 330-339 minutes of actual
teaching loads
Has 329 or less minutes of actual
1 teaching loads

Increased achievement test by 5%


5
or more over baseline test.

Increased achievement test by 4%


4 or more over baseline test.

Basic Education II. Instructional ·          Increased achievement test June-March Increased achievement test by 3%
II.2 10% 3
Services Competence by 5% over baseline test results. or more over baseline test.

Increased achievement test by 2%


2
or more over baseline test.

Increased achievement test by 1%


1 or less over baseline test.

Increased instructional and


5 independent readers by 50% or
more in the posttest .

Increased instructional and


4 independent readers by 40-49% in
the posttest .
·          Increased the number of
Basic Education II. Instructional July and Increased instructional and
instructional & independent 5%
Services II.2 February
3 independent readers by30-39% in
Competence readers in the posttest from the the posttest .
pretest by 50%.
Increased instructional and
2 independent readers by 20-29%
or more in the posttest .

Increased instructional and


1 independent readers by 19% or
less in the posttest .

Attained 75% and above required


5 competencies in a given period of
time.

·      Attained 75% of the required


Basic Education II. Instructional
II.3 learning competencies in a July-March 5%
Services Competence
given period of time.
Attained 70-74% required
4 competencies in a given period of
time.
·      Attained 75% of the required Attained 65-69-% required
Basic Education II. Instructional
II.3 learning competencies in a July-March 5% 3 competencies in a given period of
Services Competence time.
given period of time.
Attained 60-64% required
2 competencies in a given period of
time.

Attained 59% and below required


1 competencies in a given period of
time.

Increased NAT MPS by 10% or


5 more.
4 Increased NAT MPS by 8-9%.
Basic Education II. Instructional ·         Increased NAT MPS by 10%
II.4 March 5% 3 Increased NAT MPS by 6-7%.
Services Competence from the previous year.
2 Increased NAT MPS by 4-5%.

1 Increased NAT MPS by 3% or less.

Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS


KRA
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE RATING SCORE
30% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.

Conducted mentoring/coaching to
5 4 or more teachers in the
school/cluster/line.

Conducted mentoring/coaching to
4 3 teachers in the
school/cluster/line.

Basic Education III. Support to Conducted mentoring/coaching


June-March 10%
Policy Services Instructional III.1 to 4 teachers in the
3
Conducted mentoring/coaching to
2 teachers in the
Supervision school/cluster/line.
school/cluster/line.

Conducted mentoring/coaching to
2 1 teacher in the
school/cluster/line.

No teacher conducted
1 mentoring/coaching.
Managed/Monitored 5 or more
5 teachers in the implementation of
the RPMS cycle.

Managed/Monitored 4 teachers
4 in the implementation of the
RPMS cycle.

Managed/Monitored 5 teachers
Basic Education III. Support to in the implementation of the Managed/Monitored 3 teachers
July-April 10%
Policy Services Instructional III.2 3 in the implementation of the
RPMS cycle within the rating RPMS cycle.
Supervision
period.
Managed/Monitored 2 teachers
2 in the implementation of the
RPMS cycle.

Managed/Monitored 1 or none
1 teacher in the implementation of
the RPMS cycle.

Checked daily LP/Journal/Log


5 book to 5 or more teachers
Checked daily LP/Journal/Log
4 book to 4 teachers.
Basic Education III. Support to Checked daily Lesson
Checked daily LP/Journal/Log
June-March 10%
Policy Services Instructional III.3 Plans/Journals/Log book to 5 3 book to 3 teachers.
Supervision teachers.
Checked daily LP/Journal/Log
2 book to 2 teachers.
Checked daily LP/Journal/Log
1 book to 1 or none teacher.

Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS


KRA
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE RATING SCORE
5% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.

Participated 4 or more
events/activities in the
5 community within the rating
period.

Participated 3 events/activities in
4 the community within the rating
period.

Participated 4 events/activities
Basic Education IV. Community
IV.1 in the community within the June-March 2%
Policy Services Involvement
rating period.
Participated 4 events/activities Participated 2 or more
Basic Education IV. Community events/activities in the
IV.1 in the community within the June-March 2% 3
Policy Services Involvement community within the rating
rating period. period.

Participated 1 or more
events/activities in the
2 community within the rating
period.

No participated events/activities
1 in the community within the
rating period.

5 Has 5 of the identified indicators.


Conducted periodic PTA
meetings/ conferences at least
4 Has 4 of the identified indicators.
once every grading period with
Basic Education IV. Community accomplished indicators, such
IV.2 June-March 3% 3 Has 3 of the identified indicators.
Policy Services Involvement as attendance sheet, agenda of
the meeting, minutes of the 2 Has 2 of the identified indicators.
meeting, pictorials, narrative
report. Has 1 or none of the identified
1 indicators.

Produced publication/ creative


work published in National
5 Circulation/DepEd Post/ CSC
Newsletters and similar
publications.

Produced publication/ creative


IV. Professional Produced a publication/ 4 work published in regional
Basic Education publications.
Growth and IV.3 creative work for school papers June-March
Policy Services
Development in a year. Produced publication/ creative
3 work published in division
publication.

2 Produced publication/ creative


work published in school papers.
1 Unpublished work produced.

Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS


KRA
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE RATING SCORE
40% (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave.
Initiated district
activity/contest/conference with
full documentation

Initiated district
activity/contest/conference with
partial documentation

Basic Education * Inititiated District Initiated district


activity/contest/conference to support
Policy Services Plus Factor
activity/contest/conference
the delivery of instruction. without documentation

Initiated district
activity/contest/conference
without documentation

No initiated district
activity/contest/conferences.

OVERALL RATING FOR


* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned. ACCOMPLISHMENTS

CHERYL M. LAGANG ________________________________


Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like