Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chirai Anjar Rigid Pavement Design As Per IRC 58 2011
Chirai Anjar Rigid Pavement Design As Per IRC 58 2011
Input Data
Design Life = 30
Subgrade CBR = 10
Thickness of DLC = 150
Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k = 300
Tyre Pressure, p = 0.8
Modulus of elasticity of concrete, E = 30000
Poisson's ratio, m = 0.15
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Concrete, a = 0.00001
Temperature Differential for BUC, Dtbuc= 14.3
Temperature Differential for TDC, Dttdc = 12.15
Load Safety Factor, LSF = 1.2
28 - day Flexural Strength of Concrete = 4.5
4.95
90 - day Flexural Strength of Concrete =
Spacing of Contraction Joint, L = 4.5
Design Traffic
/ OC
O
C
O
C
Mpa
Mpa
m
m
10 15
55 62
278 389(300)
412(300) 300
Fatigue
Damage,ni/Ni
0
0
0
0.2329911582
0.1128055568
0.1792322017
0.0862037359
0.011284803
0
0
0
0 0.623
Fatigue
Damage,ni/Ni
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV/0!
0
0
0
0
0
0 #DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Cumulative Fatigue Damage Analysis for TDC
Rear Single Axle
Expected Flexural Allowable Repititions,
Load, KN Stress Ratio, SR
Repitions, ni Stress,Mpa Ni
190 0 2.759 0.56 101146
180 0 2.677 0.54 162672
170 0 2.595 0.52 280387
160 20793 2.512 0.51 539046
150 20772 2.430 0.49 1221339.83
140 83089 2.348 0.47 3645311.78
130 145406 2.266 0.46 19079907.28
120 166179 2.183 0.44 0.00
110 207723 2.101 0.42 0.00
100 207723 2.019 0.41 0.00
90 166179 1.937 0.39 0.00
80 58162500 1.854 0.37 0.00
Rear tandem Axle (Stress computed for 50% of Axle Load)
Expected Flexural Allowable Repititions,
Load, KN Stress Ratio, SR
Repitions, ni Stress,Mpa Ni
390 0 2.800 0.57 80281.0811058818
370 0 2.718 0.55 127757.907455402
350 0 2.636 0.53 211162.345536064
330 0 2.553 0.52 382477.914279062
310 0 2.471 0.50 790947.096375097
290 187731 2.389 0.48 2016111.68476315
225277 2.307
270 0.47 7518365.19549897
250 450555 2.224 0.45 0
230 525647 2.142 0.43 0
225277 2.060
210 0.42 0
190 337916 1.978 0.40 0
170 713378 1.895 0.38 0
Rear tandem Axle (Stress computed for 33% of Axle Load)
Expected Flexural Allowable Repititions,
Load, KN Stress Ratio, SR
Repitions, ni Stress,Mpa Ni
545 0 2.676 0.54 163901.3932637
515 0 2.594 0.52 281218.84630656
485 0 2.513 0.51 537100.333371561
455 0 2.431 0.49 1204467.80066837
425 0 2.350 0.47 3529426.30531572
395 0 2.268 0.46 17708865.4906127
365 0 2.187 0.44 1.000000000000E+200
0 2.106
335 0.43 1.000000000000E+200
719761 2.024
305 0.41 1.000000000000E+200
159947 1.943
275 0.39 1.000000000000E+200
245 239920 1.861 0.38 1.000000000000E+200
215 479841 1.780 0.36 1.000000000000E+200
Cumulative Fatigue D
Fatigue Damage,ni/Ni
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0386
0.0170
0.0228
0.0076
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 #DIV/0!
ad)
Fatigue Damage,ni/Ni
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0931
0.0300
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
0 #DIV/0!
ad)
Fatigue Damage,ni/Ni
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0.0000
Joint width, z =
(20mm for Expansion Joint, 8mm for Contraction Joint)
Dowel bars up to a distance of 1.0 x radius of relative stifness (l),from the point of load application are effective in load transfe
Number of dowel bars participating in load transfer when the wheel load is just over the dowel bar close to the edge of the slab=
l/Spacing
Assuming the load transferred by the first dowel is P t and that the load on dowel bar at a distance of l from the first dowel to be
load transferred by dowel bar system=
Hence , the dowel bar spacing and diameter assumed are safe
Design of Tie Bars
Design Parameters
Slab Thickness, h =
Lane Width, b =
Coefficient of Friction, f =
Area of plain steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
Increasing length by 100mm for loss of bond due to painting and another 50mm for tolerance in placement.
Area of deformed steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
Increasing length by 100mm for loss of bond due to painting and another 50mm for tolerance in placement.
grade reaction, k =
e stiffness,(l)=
el support, Kmds =
Axle load =
Wheel Load =
l wheel as single Wheel for a safe design)
considered for dowel bar design
ng stress in concrete,Fb=((10.16-b)fck/9.525)x100
a distance of 1.0 x radius of relative stifness (l),from the point of load application are effective in load transfer
l bars participating in load transfer when the wheel load is just over the dowel bar close to the edge of the slab= 1+
ad transferred by the first dowel is P t and that the load on dowel bar at a distance of l from the first dowel to be zero, the total
by dowel bar system=
ng Stress
a of dowel, πb4/64
el bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
Bar, Pptb = πd
(Provide a spacing of
L= 2xSstxA / BxPtbt
by 100mm for loss of bond due to painting and another 50mm for tolerance in placement.
med bars
d steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
(Provide a spacing of
L= 2xSstxA / BxPtbt
by 100mm for loss of bond due to painting and another 50mm for tolerance in placement.
20 mm
300 MPa/m
0.57 567.5071975988
200000 MPa
415000 MPa/m
160 kN
80 kN
56 kN
80 kN (Say)
40 %
32 mm (assumed)
35.1 MPa
200 mm (assumed)
150 mm
500 mm (assumed)
4 dowels
1.89 Pt
16.93 kN
51471.85 mm4
0.024
3.5 m
1.5
24 KN/m3
125 MPa
200 MPa
1.75 MPa
2.46 MPa
12 mm
231.84 mm2/m
113.10 mm2
37.70 mm
487.82 mm
488.00 mm c/c
428.57 mm
578.57 mm
579.00 mm (say)
12 mm
144.90 mm2/m
780.52 mm
781.00 mm c/c)
487.80 mm
637.80 mm
638.00 mm (say)
Rigid Pavement Design
IRC: 58: 2011
Input Data
Design Life = 30
Subgrade CBR = 10
Thickness of DLC = 150
Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k = 300
Tyre Pressure, p = 0.8
Modulus of elasticity of concrete, E = 30000
Poisson's ratio, m = 0.15
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Concrete, a = 0.00001
Temperature Differential for BUC, Dtbuc= 14.3
Temperature Differential for TDC, Dttdc = 12.15
Load Safety Factor, LSF = 1.2
28 - day Flexural Strength of Concrete = 4.5
4.95
90 - day Flexural Strength of Concrete =
Spacing of Contraction Joint, L = 4.5
Design Traffic
/ OC
O
C
O
C
Mpa
Mpa
m
m
10 15
55 62
278 389(300)
412(300) 300
Fatigue
Damage,ni/Ni
0
0
0
0.1780634979
0.0860236427
0.1350021661
0.0633621408
0.007722238
0
0
0
0 0.470
Fatigue
Damage,ni/Ni
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0.470
Adequate
Cumulative Fatigue Damage Analysis for TDC
Rear Single Axle
Expected Flexural Allowable Repititions,
Load, KN Stress Ratio, SR
Repitions, ni Stress,Mpa Ni
190 0 2.523 0.56 92350
180 0 2.453 0.55 142745
170 0 2.384 0.53 231276
160 20793 2.314 0.51 407471
150 20772 2.245 0.50 808754.08
140 83089 2.175 0.48 1927670.80
130 145406 2.105 0.47 6313975.65
120 166179 2.036 0.45 41441271.82
110 207723 1.966 0.44 0.00
100 207723 1.896 0.42 0.00
90 166179 1.827 0.41 0.00
80 58162500 1.757 0.39 0.00
Rear tandem Axle (Stress computed for 50% of Axle Load)
Expected Flexural Allowable Repititions,
Load, KN Stress Ratio, SR
Repitions, ni Stress,Mpa Ni
390 0 2.558 0.57 74476.9634736335
370 0 2.488 0.55 114513.249679972
350 0 2.419 0.54 180086.040167779
330 0 2.349 0.52 303243.462050843
310 0 2.279 0.51 563850.956656165
290 187731 2.210 0.49 1213191.23998706
225277 2.140
270 0.48 3306827.04229354
250 450555 2.070 0.46 14153246.5832734
230 525647 2.001 0.44 0
225277 1.931
210 0.43 0
190 337916 1.862 0.41 0
170 713378 1.792 0.40 0
Rear tandem Axle (Stress computed for 33% of Axle Load)
Expected Flexural Allowable Repititions,
Load, KN Stress Ratio, SR
Repitions, ni Stress,Mpa Ni
545 0 2.452 0.54 143709.393498147
515 0 2.383 0.53 231877.870157844
485 0 2.314 0.51 406213.646156378
455 0 2.246 0.50 799569.889555474
425 0 2.177 0.48 1880491.33258304
395 0 2.108 0.47 6007927.57701768
365 0 2.039 0.45 37031132.4416581
0 1.970
335 0.44 1.000000000000E+200
719761 1.901
305 0.42 1.000000000000E+200
159947 1.832
275 0.41 1.000000000000E+200
245 239920 1.763 0.39 1.000000000000E+200
215 479841 1.694 0.38 1.000000000000E+200
Cumulative Fatigue D
Fatigue Damage,ni/Ni
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0510
0.0257
0.0431
0.0230
0.0040
#DIV/0!
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 #DIV/0!
ad)
Fatigue Damage,ni/Ni
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1547
0.0681
0.0318
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
0 #DIV/0!
ad)
Fatigue Damage,ni/Ni
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0.0000
Joint width, z =
(20mm for Expansion Joint, 8mm for Contraction Joint)
Dowel bars up to a distance of 1.0 x radius of relative stifness (l),from the point of load application are effective in load transfe
Number of dowel bars participating in load transfer when the wheel load is just over the dowel bar close to the edge of the slab=
l/Spacing
Assuming the load transferred by the first dowel is P t and that the load on dowel bar at a distance of l from the first dowel to be
load transferred by dowel bar system=
Hence , the dowel bar spacing and diameter assumed are unsafe
Design of Tie Bars
Design Parameters
Slab Thickness, h =
Lane Width, b =
Coefficient of Friction, f =
Area of plain steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
Increasing length by 100mm for loss of bond due to painting and another 50mm for tolerance in placement.
Area of deformed steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
Increasing length by 100mm for loss of bond due to painting and another 50mm for tolerance in placement.
grade reaction, k =
e stiffness,(l)=
el support, Kmds =
Axle load =
Wheel Load =
l wheel as single Wheel for a safe design)
considered for dowel bar design
ng stress in concrete,Fb=((10.16-b)fck/9.525)x100
a distance of 1.0 x radius of relative stifness (l),from the point of load application are effective in load transfer
l bars participating in load transfer when the wheel load is just over the dowel bar close to the edge of the slab= 1+
ad transferred by the first dowel is P t and that the load on dowel bar at a distance of l from the first dowel to be zero, the total
by dowel bar system=
ng Stress
a of dowel, πb4/64
el bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
Bar, Pptb = πd
(Provide a spacing of
L= 2xSstxA / BxPtbt
by 100mm for loss of bond due to painting and another 50mm for tolerance in placement.
med bars
d steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
(Provide a spacing of
L= 2xSstxA / BxPtbt
by 100mm for loss of bond due to painting and another 50mm for tolerance in placement.
20 mm
300 MPa/m
0.57 567.5071975988
200000 MPa
415000 MPa/m
160 kN
80 kN
56 kN
80 kN (Say)
40 %
32 mm (assumed)
29.2 MPa
200 mm (assumed)
150 mm
500 mm (assumed)
4 dowels
1.89 Pt
16.93 kN
51471.85 mm4
0.024
3.5 m
1.5
24 KN/m3
125 MPa
200 MPa
1.75 MPa
2.46 MPa
12 mm
231.84 mm2/m
113.10 mm2
37.70 mm
487.82 mm
488.00 mm c/c
428.57 mm
578.57 mm
579.00 mm (say)
12 mm
144.90 mm2/m
780.52 mm
781.00 mm c/c)
487.80 mm
637.80 mm
638.00 mm (say)
Annexure 2.5 (b)
Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
Spur road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
Input Data
Single Axle
22 26.4 0.00 0 Infinity
20 24 0.00 0 Infinity
18 21.6 0.00 0 Infinity
16 19.2 22.900 0.51 275000 485184
14 16.8 20.551 0.46 825000 14335236
12 14.4 18.133 0.40 2750000 Infinity
10 12 15.628 0.35 3300000 Infinity
4.5 5.4 8.073 0.18 6050000 Infinity
Tandem Axle
28 33.6 15.936 0.35 1375000 Infinity
24 28.8 14.172 0.31 4125000 Infinity
20 24 12.324 0.27 2475000 Infinity
16 19.2 10.365 0.23 550000 Infinity
7 8.4 5.4 0.12 2750000 Infinity
Cumulative fatigue life consumed =
Since, the cumulative fatigue life consumed being less than 1, the design is safe from fatigue consideration.
A - 86
Annexure 2.5 (b)
Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
Spur road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
Total of Temperature Warping Stress and the highest axle load stress
= 22.9 + 19.24
= 42.14 kg/cm2
<45 kg/sq. cm
Hence, the pavement thickness of 25 cm is safe under the combined action of wheel load and temperature
= 15.66 kg/cm2
<45 kg/sq. cm, hence, the pavement thickness of 25 cm
assumed is safe
A - 87
Annexure 2.5 (b)
Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
Spur road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
= 2.0137 Pt
Percentage of load transfer = 40 %
Load carried by the outer dowel bar, P t = (7000 x 0.4) /2.0137
= 1390 kg
A - 88
Annexure 2.5 (b)
Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
Spur road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
A - 89
Annexure 2.5 (b)
Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
Spur road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
Design Parameters
= 1.575 cm2/m
Cross sectional area of tie bar, A = (/4)d 2
= 1.131 cm2
Perimeter of Tie Bar, Ps = d
= 3.7699 cm
Spacing of Tie Bars = A / As
= 71.81 cm
say, 72 cm c/c
Increase length of tie bar by 10 cm for loss of bond due to painting and another 5 cm for tolerance in placement.
A - 90
Annexure 2.5 (b)
d Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
Fatigue Life
Consumed
0.5667957297
0.0575505004
0.624
A - 91
Annexure 2.5 (b)
d Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
A - 92
Annexure 2.5 (b)
d Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
elative stiffness, from the point of load application are effective in load
A - 93
Annexure 2.5 (b)
d Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
A - 94
Annexure 2.5 (b)
d Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
A - 95
65.5
104800