Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Geonets - Wikipedia
Geonets - Wikipedia
Geonets
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A geonet is a geosynthetic material consisting of integrally connected parallel sets of ribs overlying similar sets
at various angles for in-plane drainage of liquids or gases. Geonets are often laminated with geotextiles on one
or both surfaces and are then referred to as drainage geocomposites. They are competitive with other drainage
geocomposites having different core configurations.[1]
Contents
1 Manufacturing
2 Properties
2.1 Physical properties
2.2 Mechanical properties
2.3 Hydraulic properties
2.4 Endurance properties
2.5 Environmental properties
3 Theoretical concepts [1]
4 Construction methods [1]
5 References
6 Further reading
Manufacturing
Geonets are formed by a continuous extrusion process into a netlike configuration of parallel sets of
homogeneously interconnected ribs. There are three categories of geonets. The following are illustrated:
Biplanar geonets: These are the original and most common types and consist of two sets of intersecting
ribs at different angles and spacings. The ribs themselves are of different sizes and shapes for different
styles.
Triplanar geonets: These have parallel central ribs with smaller sets of ribs above and beneath mainly for
geometric stability.
Other geonets: These newer geonet structures have either box shaped channels or protruding columns
from an underlying support network.
Each of the above categories have variations within themselves (mainly thickness) and new product
development by various manufacturers is quite active.
All geonets that are currently available are made from polyethylene resin. The density varies from 0.94 to
0.96 mg/l, with the higher values forming the more rigid products. In this regard, the resin is true high-density
polyethylene (HDPE) unlike the density used in HDPE geomembranes that is really medium density. The resin
is formulated with 2.0 to 2.5% carbon black (usually in a concentrated form mixed with a polyethylene carrier
resin), and 0.25 to 0.75% additives that serve as processing aids and anti-oxidants.
While quite different in the manufacture or configuration than geonets are competitive geosynthetic products
called "geospacers". Their drainage cores consists of nubs, columns, cuspations, or 3-D networks of stiff
polymer strands. They are generally used for drainage behind retaining walls, plaza decks or green roofs.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geonets 1/5
8/28/2017 Geonets - Wikipedia
Properties
Since the primary function of a geonet is to convey liquid within the plane of its structure, the in-plane
hydraulic flow rate, or transmissivity, is of paramount importance. However, other features, which may
influence this value over the service lifetime of the geonet, are also of importance. Thus, a number of physical,
mechanical, endurance, and environmental properties will also be mentioned.
Physical properties
The tests for physical properties are either covered in ASTM, ISO or GRI Standards.
Mechanical properties
Hydraulic properties
planar transmisivity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geonets 2/5
8/28/2017 Geonets - Wikipedia
Endurance properties
type of resin
creep behavior
intrusion of adjacent materials
extrusion of clay materials
Environmental properties
A series of environmental related issues can have impact on the flow-rate performance of geonets.
temperature effects
permeating liquid properties
biological growth within geonet structure
resistance to light and weather
For geonets serving as a drainage medium, the targeted value is flow rate and the above concept becomes:
where
As stated previously, if we desire an alternative to the flow rate, calculations can be based on Darcy's formula
(assuming saturated conditions and laminar flow) obtaining the transmissivity, θ. This important concept is
repeated.
θ = transmissivity (m2/s),
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geonets 3/5
8/28/2017 Geonets - Wikipedia
t = thickness (m).
As seen in the equation, q/W and θ carry the same units and are directly related to one another by means of the
hydraulic gradient i. At a hydraulic gradient of 1.0, they are numerically identical. At all other values of
hydraulic gradient they are not equal. Also note that the system should be saturated and flow must be laminar in
order to use transmissivity. When in doubt, it is usually best to use flow rate per unit width.
The rolls are usually placed with their roll directions oriented up-and-down slope, rather than along (or parallel
to) them. There are two reasons for this: First, the machine direction has the greatest strength and flow rate;
second, such orientation eliminates seams along the flow direction. If triplanar or boxlike channel geonets are
being used for their high flow in the machine direction, the proper orientation is critical during placement. For
very long slopes or along the base of a facility, flow must continue unimpeded from one geonet to the next.
When geotextiles are liminated to the geonet, the geotextiles must be stripped back from the overlapped area
such the upgradient geonet is directly on the downgradient geonet in shingled manner. There can be no
geotextile sandwiched within this overlap area.
The seaming or joining of geonets is difficult. Assuming stress does not have to be transferred from one roll to
the next, plastic electrical ties, threaded loops, and wires have all been used with a relatively small overlaps of
50 100 mm. Metal hog rings should never be used when geonets are used adjacent to geomembranes. There are
questions as to what influence overlapping has on the geonet's flow rate. The connection of geonets to
perforated drainage pipes is difficult and extremely important. The geonet's outlet must be free draining at all
times even in winter under freezing conditions.
Nothwithstanding the above concerns, geonets are very impressive with respect to their flow-rate capability,
ease of construction, savings in airspace, and overall economy in many facilities where drainage must be
accommodated.
References
1. Koerner, R. M. (2012). Designing With Geosynthetics (6th ed.). Xlibris Publishing Co., 914 pgs.
Further reading
Austin, R. A., "The Manufacture of Geonets and Composite Products," Proc. GRI-8 on Geosynthetic
Resins, Formulations and Manufacturing, IFAI, 1995, pp. 127–238.
Eith, A. W. and Koerner, R. M., "Field Evaluation of GEonet Flow Rate (Transmissivity) Under
Increasing Load," J. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 11, Nos. 5-6, 1992, pp. 153–166.
Koerner, R. M. and Koerner, G. R., "Geocomposite Drainage Material Connections and Attachments,"
Proc. GRI-22 Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, GSI Publ., Folsom, PA, 2009, pp. 57–65.
Kolbasuk, G. M., Lydick, L. D. and Reed, L. S., "Effects of Test Procedures on Geonet Transmissivity
Results," J. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 11, Nos. 4-6, 1992, pp. 153–166.
Narejo, D. and Allen, S., "Using the Stepped Isothermal Method for Geonet Creep Evaluation," Proc.
EuroGeo3, Munich, Germany, 2004, pp. 539-544.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geonets 4/5
8/28/2017 Geonets - Wikipedia
Ramsey, B. and Narejo, D., "Using Woven and Heat-Bonded Geotextiles in Geonet Geocomposites,"
Proc. GeoFrontiers, GSP 130-142, ASCE, 2005 (on CD).
Thornton, J. S., Allen, S. R., Siebken, J. R., "Long Term Compressive Creep Behavior of High Density
Polyethylene Geonet," Proc. of the 2nd European Geosynthetics Conference and Exhibition, October 1–
18, 2000, Bologna, Italy, pp. 869–874.
Zagorski, G. A. and Wayne, M. H., "Geonet Seams," J. of Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 9, Nos.
4-6, 1990, pp. 207–220.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geonets 5/5