That depends on Heliocentric or Geocentrically.

Brad Cowan had this

cycle due in 2001 and many people lost money on it. Brad demonstrates the
use of Uranus (Helio) in his books....talk to Kmelby0001@a... on the
books. Many people with those originally thought Brad listed ALL the
cycles
for the markets. He did not.
When the Soybean 2001 failed to come in (as of yet) many lost faith in
Brads
methods. Knowledge of other cycles and a "core" understanding of how they
relate to the structures found in financial markets is the goal of reading
those books. Brad left large gaps in the actual method. He "walks around"
a
key ingredient that begins to unlock the books.
Brad states also that his analysis goes well beyond Gann. Gann used
numbered squares to define the extent of price and time. Brad fuses these
together in vector form to locate points of force. One can spend years in
those books.
A better place to start I think is the natal chart. Many people
underestimate the natal. The reason for this I believe is not knowing what
chart is the correct one. Using the wrong chart can get you no resonance
(in
other words it fails). So you walk away thinking that the natal concept
does
not work. This is completely false.