Professional Documents
Culture Documents
06 - Drilling Fluids
06 - Drilling Fluids
06 - Drilling Fluids
6.1 Introduction
Drilling fluids are generally the "blood" of all drilling operations and the
petroleum industry especially has continued to make increasing use of these
fluids the cost of which can account for over 20% of total operating costs.
• Design for optimum hydraulics for effective hole cleaning and stability, fluid
displacement strategies for cement-mud displacement, etc.
1. Remove cuttings from the bottom of the hole and carry them to the surface
11. Prevent and control corrosion of drillstring and other wellbore facilities
• must not damage the formation either through plugging by solids, bacterial
deterioration, etc.
The properties of the fluids depend largely on the fluid composition and flow
behavioural characteristics. Nevertheless, the key properties of the drilling
fluid are:
3. Fluid Loss: Both filtrate (in millilitres) and cake thickness(in 1164") are
measured using the Filter Press. There are static and dynamic filter
presses for static and dynamic filtration.
4. Solids Content: Sand content can be measured by the sand content kit
while the retort kit can evaluate all solids in the system plus the liquid
fractions.
There are other measurements/analysis carried out on drilling fluids, but the
above are the relatively basic ones.
Drilling fluids can be either gas, liquid slurry or foam. The liquid slurry is called
drilling mud and is the most commonly used drilling fluid. Gas drilling fluids are
hardly used but for some special applications. They are used in combination
with the liquid a foam fluids especially for underbalanced drilling.
1. A continuous phase which can be either water, oil and is the base fluid
From the point of view of mud logging, drilling muds offer the best advantage
especially with respect to cuttings recovery and well control.
There are basically three major types of drilling fluids nowadays. These are:
These are a mixture of solids, liquids and chemicals. These are active solids
like bentonite added to water with the water as the continuous phase. .
Bentonite acts mainly as the dispersed phase providing the main gel structure.
Chemical additives are added in various proportions to control the fluid
properties. These chemical additives are commonly used for the control of pH,
viscosity, weight, fluid loss, etc.
For example,
There are also Loss Control Materials (LCM) to prevent and control the total
loss of whole mud into the formation. Examples are nut plug, byrofibre, Mica,
etc and are inactive materials.
The chemical additives normally provide the generic names for the different
water based muds. Examples are
1. Inhibitive Mud - These are calcium based muds used to control swelling
and hydration of clays and sensitive shales. Highly suitable for drilling
formations containing gypsum and hydrites as well as dirty sands(sands
with high clay content).
4. Salt, Saturated Muds - These are brine based fluids in which the
continuous phase is either Sodium chloride, Calcium Chloride, Calcium
Bromide, Zinc Bromide, etc. They are good for drilling through salt sections
where fresh water mud contamination is a major threat.
These are similar in composition as Water based muds except that the
continuous phase is oil. There are three types
3. Invert muds I.e. oil-in water emulsions with water as continuous phase and
oil as dispersed phase.
These muds are generally more expensive and require more stringent
pollution control. Their use is generally restricted to conditions where WBM
are dangerous, technically impossible or uneconomical to use. These include
high pressure and high pressure applications as well as conditions where the
formation such as shale, is highly sensitive to water based muds. They are
particularly popular for drilling advanced wells such as extended reach wells,
multilateral and horizontal wells.
• Bentonite
• Typical additives
• LCM
• Barytes, etc.
Likewise, so-called pseudo oil based muds are also being developed which
are mainly water based systems but possess the merits of oilbased muds
especially in terms of stability at high temperature and high pressure.
Generally, drilling and completion fluids are known to possess the following
visco-elastic properties for a variety of oilfield operations:
• Plastic viscosity
• Yield point
• Gel Strength
• The suspension and transport of solids including cuttings and milled swarfs
• Design for the concentration and type of chemical additives for optimum
fluids formulation.
Accurate prediction of the flow behaviour and flow model is the key to
adjusting the rheological properties for specific applications.
In general, the Bingham plastic and Power Law models represent the popular
models used for defining drilling/completion fluid rheological properties. These
models are separately expressed as:
τ = τy + µp∗γ
In field units,
τ = Shear stress, lb/100ft2: τy = Bingham yield point, lb/100ft2:
µp = Plastic viscosity, cp; γ= Shear rate, sec
Most polymer based muds fall into category and it is defined mathematically
as:
τ = K *γn
τ = τ y + K *γn
4. Casson’s Model:
1 1
τ = K 0 + K 1 γ2
2 *
τ = A(γ+ C )
B
where
τ = Shear stress
τy =Yield point
µp = Plastic viscosity
γ= shear rate
K =consistency index
µ p = θ600 − θ300
where
θ600, 300 = dial readings at speeds 600rpm and 300 rpms respectively.
τ y = θ300 − µ p
The design of drilling fluids for optimum results involves the specification of :
This depends largely on the type of formation to be drilled and the expected
downhole operating conditions including the potential hazards to be
encountered. These will invariably dictate the actual type and composition of
the fluid in terms of chemical additives.
One of the primary functions of the drilling fluid is the control of formation
through the imposition of hydrostatic pressure on the formation. Thus, the
mud must be of sufficient density to meet this basic function
Therefore
0.052*ρm*D=pR +POB
It is important that the imposed pressure must not be more than the maximum
allowable which must be a factor less that the formation breakdown pressure.
From the above, the mud density required can be computed as follows
The main rheological properties are apparent viscosity, plastic Viscosity, gel
strength, yield, n and K. The drilling mud must have good suspension and
carrying capacities. Therefore optimum combination of these properties are
required. These properties are adjustable to suit specific requirements
whereas the mud density is largely dependent on the formation pore pressure.
4. Other properties
Other relevant properties are as specified in Section 2.2 above and can be
adjusted to requirements.
The main factors governing the choice and composition of drilling fluids are
mainly
• Range of temperature
• Formation pressure and rock strength which dictate the mud weight and
fluid type
• Formation evaluation technique which might require change from oil based
to water based mud; e,g. Resitivity logs.
• Water quality e.g Offshore where sea water may be used resulting in the
use of unsaturated salt water muds!
• Environmental considerations.
• Borehole problems
Oyeneyin, M.B. Page 12 of 18 ©Univation
Shell Special Intensive Training Programme
High pressure and high temperature are known to have major effects on
especially the drilling fluids.
Temperature Effects
Generally, water based drilling muds are known to be highly unstable in HP-
HT wells with viscosity reducing with increase in temperature; Baryte sag
and secondary reactions and breakdown of polymer systems have been
known to occur.
The effect on fluid loss on the other hand is not well known except that the
possibility of mud instability can lead to the presence of more 'more' 'free
water' which can result in higher filtrate loss. However, the reduced annular
pressure may minimise this loss.
Pressure does not appear to have any major effect on the fluid rheological
properties but density has been known to decrease with increase in pressure.
For oil based muds, temperature has been known to lead to a decrease in
viscosity while pressure causes an increase in viscosity.
Barite sag i.e. the settling of solids onto the low side wall of a deviated hole or
to the sump of a vertical hole. Potential avalanche of solids settling will lead to
inconsistency with respect to mud weight. Attempting to viscosity the mud
may lead to a higher Equivalent mud density which may result in fractures and
potential lost circulation problem.
Effect of Pressure
Thus, adequate correction for the fluid properties must be effected when
drilling HP-HT wells.
Suggested Control
2. Efforts should be made to make the low shear rate rheology as high as
possible to suit existing hole conditions.
τ = K γn
τ2
log
τ1
n=
γ
log 2
γ1
τ
K =
γn
Apparent Viscosity, µa
n
Kd (1− n) 3+ 1
n
µa =
96v (1− n ) 0.0416
Reynolds Number
n
89100 ρv (2 − n )
0.0416d
Re =
K 3+ 1
n
n
1
3+
LKv n n
0.0416
∆p = 1+ n
- For Laminar Flow
144000 d
Lfρv 2
∆p = - For Turbulent Flow
25.8d
Annular Flow
Apparent Viscosity
n
K (d2 − d1 ) 2+ 1
1− n
µa = n
144v (1− n ) 0.0208
Reynolds Number
n
109,000 ρv (2 − n ) 0.0208(d2 − d1 )
Re =
K 2+ 1
n
n
1
2+
LKv n n
0.0208
∆p = - Laminar Flow
144000(d 2 − d1 )
1+ n
Lfρv 2
∆p = - Turbulent Flow
21.1(d 2 − d1 )
B. Herschel-Bulkley Fluids
τ = τ 0 + K γn K=
(τ - τ 0 )
γn
τ = τ y + µ pγ
Apparent Viscosity
6.66τ y d
µa = µ p +
vc
Reynolds Number
928 ρvd
Re =
µ
µ pvL τ yL
∆p = 2
+ - Laminar Flow
1500d 225d
fL ρv 2
∆p = - Turbulent Flow
25.8d
Annular Flow
Apparent Viscosity
5τ y (d 2 − d1 )
µa = µ p +
v
Reynolds Number
928 ρvd
Re =
µa
µ p vL τyL
∆p = + - Laminar Flow
1000(d 2 − d 2 ) 2
200(d 2 − d1 )
fLρv 2
∆p = - Turbulent Flow
21.1(d 2 − d1 )
A. pipe flow
q=2.45*d2*v
B. Annular Flow
(
q = 2.45 * d 22 − d12 * va )
Output q∆p
Mechanical Efficiency, ηm = =
Input Input
q∆p
Input HP Requirements =
1714ηm