i Brigham Attorney at law Mary.brighamlaw@att.net www.brighanlaw.com Terry Smith, Legal Assistant terry.brighamlaw@att.net 39 Sherman Hill Road, Ste, C104 Tole, 203-263-0122 Woodbury, Connecticut 06798 Facsimile 203-405-6558 August 17, 2015 Via email only: alishamathers@lawyer.com Alisha C. Mathers P.O. Box 465 Enfield, CT 08083 Re: Gizzi vs. Gizzi Dear Attorney Mathers: Let this letter serve as notice to your client that Carmine and Gianni will be moving to Watertown, CT and attending school at Swift Middle School and Fletcher W. Judson School, respectively. Their new address will not be disclosed to your client out of concern for the children’s safety and well-being. In order that the transition for the boys continues to go smoothly and Ms. Hickman is aware of what information has been provided and what action will be taken in the event she attempts to engage in the behavior she has in the past, be advised of the following: 1. Both schools have alrendy received copies of all relevant court orders; 2. I,along with Mr, Gizzi and Attorney Brovwn, will be meeting with the Superintendent and the principals of both schools to advise them that Ms. Hickman is to have no contact with the school or the children and that Mr. Gizzi has a security concern about Ms. Hickman absconding with the children; 3. The Watertown Police Department will be advised of the pending criminal matter and the means by which Ms. Hickman attempted to abduct the boys;4, If Ms. Hickman contacts the school in any fashion, a motion for contempt and modification of supervised access will be filed; 5. Ifthe schools receive any anonymous calls regarding the children, the police will be contacted and an investigation pursued; 6. If Ms, Hickman attends or participates in any extracurricular activities a motion for contempt and modification of supervised access will be filed; and 7. IfMs. Hickman attempts to contact the boys a motion for contempt and modification of supervised access will be filed and the police will be contacted. Furthermore, Mr. Gizzi has been provided the name of the psychologist that Ms, Hickman has suggested, He has rejected this suggestion. The individual has no apparent training or experience in high conflict custody matters or alienation and, as important, his office is out of his home. Given the criminal charges pending against Ms, Hickman, that setting does not provide the security necessary to protect the children. ed, Twill be in contact with you this week to select a date for financial orders to be addi Very truly yours, dag “Mary Pscateli Brigham MPBits ce: Attorney William R.J.P. Brown, Esq. wbrown@xrjpbrown.com