Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Salem College Department of Education

TAS Project Evaluation Rubric


Student Name:

descriptor 4 3 2 1 score
content Content is written clearly/ Content is written with a logical Content is vague in conveying a Content lacks clear point of view 4 3 2 1
concisely with a logical progression of ideas and point of view or does not create a and logical sequence of
progression of ideas and supporting information; selects strong sense of purpose. Includes information. Includes little
supporting information; uses rich, vocabulary appropriate for some persuasive information but persuasive information and only
varied, and appropriate audience; includes persuasive few facts; some of the information one/ two facts about the topic;
vocabulary; organizers provide a information. may not seem to fit. information is incomplete, out of
sense of main ideas; information date, and/or incomplete;
is accurate/ current. sequencing is unclear.
depth Exhibits outstanding depth of Exhibits proficient depth of Exhibits superficial depth of Exhibits superficial or inadequate 4 3 2 1
specific content knowledge specific content knowledge content knowledge depth/breadth of content
knowledge
rigor Presentation has clear tie to core Presentation has tangential tie to Presentation has unclear tie to Presentation lacks curricular 4 3 2 1
curricular content developed to core curricular content developed core curricular content developed relevance and/or is inadequately
appropriate level to adequate level to minimal level developed
design and layout Layout is logical and appealing; Layout is organized; design Layout is haphazard; design Layout is confusing; design 4 3 2 1
elements are consistent and elements are consistent and elements do not always support elements interfere with content
reinforce content message; support content message; content message; background/ message; inappropriate use of
background/ colors enhance background/ colors do not colors detract from readability colors or background
readability enhance readability
text elements Text fonts and sizes are well- Text fonts and sizes are readable; Text fonts and sizes may cause Text fonts and sizes make the 4 3 2 1
chosen; fonts are easy-to-read and occasionally the fonts/ italics/ distraction; overall readability is content difficult to read;
point size varies appropriately for bolds/ long paragraphs/ color difficult with lengthy paragraphs, inappropriate font size, poor use
headings and text; use of italics, detract from readability too many fonts, or overuse of of headings, formatting, or
bold, and indentations enhance appropriate fonts headings
readability;
21st century features Presentation integrates multiple Features of the design enhance the Message or purpose is unclear; Presentation is submitted, but it 4 3 2 1
skills/ features; good example of content; overall presentation is focus is on showing off features does not meet requirements
communication/ design and attractive and effectively delivers rather than content OR focus is on
content presentations skills content text without design features
mechanics No errors in grammar, Little or no editing required for Spelling, punctuation, and Errors in spelling, capitalization, 4 3 2 1
capitalization, punctuation, and grammar, punctuation, or spelling grammar errors distract or impair punctuation, usage, and grammar
spelling readability distract the reader; major editing/
revision required

references/citations All resources are cited; consistent All resources are cited; All resources are cited; incorrect Resources are not cited; reference 4 3 2 1
and appropriate use of APA- inconsistent use of APA formatted use of APA formatted citations; list is missing or incomplete
formatted citations; correct citations; occasional errors in multiple errors in reference
reference listings reference listings listings

total/ 32 #
plus all required elements (see assignment sheet)/ 8 #
sound file – 3 graphics – table/graph/chart – 3 hyperlinks
TOTAL SCORE/ 40 #

You might also like