Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nicholson1992 Contrasting Mineralogical-Geochemical Signatures of Manganese Oxide PDF
Nicholson1992 Contrasting Mineralogical-Geochemical Signatures of Manganese Oxide PDF
Nicholson1992 Contrasting Mineralogical-Geochemical Signatures of Manganese Oxide PDF
Geology
Vol, 87, 1992, pp. 1253-1264
Contrasting
Mineralogical-Geochemical
Signatures
of Manganese
Oxides'
Guidesto Metallogenesis
KEITH NICHOLSON
School
ofApplied
Sciences,
TheRobert
Gordon
University,
Aberdeen
AB11HG,Scotland,
UnitedKingdom
Abstract
o3ol-o128/92/13o2/1253-12/$3.oo 1253
1254 KEITH NICHOLSON
TABLV.1. Classification
of the DifferentGeneticTypes 1978, 1980; Potter and Rossman,1979a, b; Sozanski
of ManganeseOxideDepositson the Basis and Cronan, 1979; Carlson and Schwertmann,1987;
of FormationProcessandDepositional Environment
Nicholson,1988a, b, c, 1989b.)
Supergene Hydrothermal Weatheringdeposits(Sw):Surfacecrustsandcoat-
ings formed by weathering,dendrites,desert var-
Terrestrial Marine Terrestrial Marine nish, laterites. (Data sources:Hewett and Fleischer,
1960; Boyle, 1965; Roy, 1968; Potter andRossman,
Bogsandsoils Crusts Hot spring Sedimentary
Freshwater Coatings Vein exhalative
1979a, b; Nahon et al., 1983; Nicholson, 1987a;
Weathering Nodules Hawker andThompson,1988.)
Dubhites Sediments Dubbites(Sa):Oxidesformedby the weatheringof
a mineralizedsequence(from the Gaelic dubhithir,
"black earth," cf. gossan,"ferruginousearth"), i.e.,
the manganeseoxide equivalentof a gossan.(Data
tives.Within thislatter category,the recognitionof sources:Hewett and Fleischer,1960; Heyl and Bo-
oxidesassociated with baseandpreciousmetalminer- zion, 1962; Boyle, 1965; Hewett, 1971; Blain and
alization is also considered. Andrew, 1977; Ashley,1980; Butt andSmith,1980;
Siderov et al., 1980; van Moort and Swensson,1982,
Environmentsof Formationof Manganese 1984; Taylor and Appleyard,1983; Nickel, 1984;
Oxide Minerals
Nicholson, 1986, 1987a, 1989a; Scott, 1986; Scott
For the purposesof this paper, manganese oxide andTaylor, 1987; MosserandZeegers,1988; Nimfo-
depositsare classifiedfirst by the mineral-forming pouloset al., 1988;Nimfopoulos
andPattrick,1991.)
processandthenonthe basisof the depositional envi-
ronment(Table1); oxidesformedby supergene and Supergene: marine(S•Aa)
hydrothermalprocessesare therefore each subdi- Manganesenodules,crusts,and coatingsprecipi-
videdinto thosedepositedin the terrestrialandma- tated directlyfrom seawater(hydrogenic-hydrogen-
rine environments. The term "supergene"is usedto ousdeposits)and beddedmanganiferous sediments
refer to oxides formed under ambient conditions at
the earth's surface in both terrestrial and marine envi-
deposited in the marineenvironment with the manga-
nesesuppliedfrom sourcesotherthanhydrothermal
ronmentsandnotin the morerestrictivesenseofRoy (i.e.,continental run-off,hydrogenic, diagenetic,hal-
(1981), whichincludesonly oxidesformedby pro- myrolytic). In some studies, manganeseoxides
cesses of secondary enrichment.Brief descriptions of formed in the continental shelf-shallow-sea environ-
the typesof depositsincludedin eachcategoryare ment are termed "shallow-marine"depositsand
givenbelow.In addition,to avoidrepeatedmultiple have been differentiated from "oceanic," "deep-
references, the data sourcesused to create the tables
sea," or "marine" oxides(e.g., Calvert and Price,
andfiguresin thisworkarelistedfollowingeachcate- 1977). Where relevant,thisdistinctionhasbeenre-
goryof deposit.Metamorphosed depositsarenotcon- tainedsinceit mayfurtheraid reconstructions of an-
sideredbecausethis additionalprocesswill distort cient depositionalenvironments.(Data sources:He-
the primarymineralogicalsignature;the distinctive wett, 1966; Horn, 1972; Mart and Saas,1972; Cal-
geochemistry of the depositmay, however,be pre- lender and Bowser,1976; Glasbyand Read, 1976;
servedfollowingmetamorphism and the diagnostic Burns and Burns, 1977, 1979; Calvert and Price,
signatures derivedin thiswork maythereforebe ap- 1977; Jenkyns,1977; MargaritzandBrenner,1979;
plicableto suchdeposits. Cronan, 1980; Ostwald, 1980, 1981; Craig et al.,
Supergene: Terrestrial(ST) 1982; Moorby and Cronan, 1983; Baturin, 1988;
Bolton et al., 1988; Pattan, 1988; Bernat et al., 1989;
Bogsandsoils(Ssoid:All accumulations of manga- Jauhari,1989, 1990; Le Suaveet al., 1989; Usui et
neseoxidesfoundin soilprofiles,includingswampor al., 1989; Ajmal, 1990; E1 Sharkawlet al., 1990;
bogdeposits,regardlessof morphology, i.e., crusts, Manginiet al., 1990; Roy et al., 1990.)
coatings,nodules,etc. (Data sources:Jonesand
Milne, 1956; Taylor et al., 1964; Taylor, 1968; Hydrothermal:
Terrestrial(HT)
Chew, 1978; McKenzie, 1980; Chukhrov and Gorsh-
kov, 1981; Nicholson,1987a.) Hot spring(Hh/s):
Oxidesdeposited directlyfrom
Freshwater(Sfw)deposits: andcoatingsgeothermalwaters around hot springsand pools.
Cements
on stream or lacustrine sediments, lacustrine nod- (Datasources:
CallaghanandThomas,1939; Hewett
ules,lacustrinesediments, oxidecoatings,andveins andFleischer,1960; Hariya, 1961, 1980; Hewett et
depositedfromgroundwater. (Datasources: Hewett al., 1963; Hewett, 1966; Roy, 1968, 1981; Ossa,
and Fleischer, 1960; Vasari et al., 1972; Callender 1970; Sillitoe, 1975; Usui et al., 1989; Nicholson,un-
and Bowser,1976; Calvert and Price, 1977; Ghosh, pub. data.)
MANGANESEMINERALIZATION: MINERALOGICAL-GEOCHEMICAL SIGNATURES 19.55
Vein (Hvein):
This categoryonly includesthe pri- foundin hydrothermaldeposits.Within the super-
•naryprecipitatesandnot the mineralsin the upper genedeposits,
nomineralscanbeemployed todiffer-
oxidizedsequence.Theselatter oxidesare secondary entiate between oxides formed in marine or terres-
in originandare thereforeclassified
eitherassuper- trial environments.However, it is notable that chal-
gene-weathered depositsor as dubhitesif derived cophanite, coronadite,
hetaerolite,i.e., the common
from mineralization.(Data sources:Burbank, 1933; Zn-Pb-bearingoxides,and possiblycredneriteand
Hewett and Fleischer, 1960; Hewett, 1966; Casade- woodruffiteareinvariablyassociated with basemetal
vail and Ohmoto, 1977; Roy, 1981; Tindle and mineralization. Recognitionoftheseminerals isthere-
Webb, 1989.) fore of value in mineral explorationprogramsbe-
causethey enabledubhitesto be distinguished from
Hydrothermal:Marine (H•vO barrensupergene oxidedeposits.It isinterestingthat
Sedimentary exhalative(Hsedex):
Beddedmangani- although base metal depositscommonlydevelop
feroussedimentsof exhalativeorigin. (Data sources: dubhitescontainingZn-Pb-(Cu?)manganese oxides
Bonatti et al., 1972; Cronan, 1972, 1980; Rona, (e.g.,BrokenHill, New SouthWales,Australia;van
1978, 1984; Zantop, 1978, 1981; BurnsandBurns, Moort and Swensson,1982, 1984), the manganese
1979; Bostrom,1980; Rossiet al., 1980; Grill et al., oxidecapswhich commonlyform over epithermal
1981;Meylanet al., 1981;Roy, 1981;Cronanet al., Au-Ag mineralization (e.g., Wau, Papua New
1982; Moorby and Cronan, 1983; Taylor, 1983; Guinea;Webster and Mann, 1984) are invariably
Moorby et al., 1984; Alt, 1988; Boltonet al., 1988; composed of amorphous wadwith no crystalline ox-
Varnavaset al., 1988; Nicholson, 1989a, 1992; Usui idespresent.The exceptionto thisis the occurrence
et al., 1989.) of cryptomelanefrom the oxidizedprofile of the
Marthagoldmine,Waihi, New Zealand(Nicholson,
MineralogicalSignatures unpub.data)andthe presence of todorokitein black
Mineralogyasa tool in characterizing the genetic calcitefromAu-Agveins(HewettandRadtke,1967).
originof manganese depositshasbeenusedoccasion-
GeochemicalEnrichment Signatures
ally,but diagnostic mineralogical signatureshavenot
beenrigorouslydefined.Roy (1968; 1981, table 18) Althoughthe identificationof chemicalenrich-
hassummarizedthe occurrenceof commonmanga- ments is well establishedas a method in lithogeo-
nese minerals but does not discriminate oxides chemicalexplorationfor mineraldeposits(e.g., Go-
formedby the weatheringof ore deposits.Cronanet vett, 1983), the applicationof thistechniqueto man-
al. (1982) noted that b-MnO2commonlyoccursin ganesedepositsis not asstraightforward asthat for
submarinesupergenemanganese deposits,whereas silicatelithologies.The reasonfor this lies in the
birnessiteand todorokitepredominatein exhalative strongadsorption capacityof manganese oxidesfor
mineralization(Rona,1978, 1984). cations. Because these oxides are the dominant com-
A review of the literature (Table 2) revealsthat ponentin the deposits, thispropertymeansthat the
manyof the Mn+4 oxidesoccurin a wide rangeof traceelementsignatureis stronglydependenton the
environments. In orderto clarifythe distributionpat- concentrationof manganese oxidesin the deposit,a
tern, mineralswhich consistentlyappearonly as an situationwhichis notparalleledin the interpretation
accessory mineral,or whicharerecordedin lessthan of silicaterockgeochemical enrichments.Thisprop-
10 percentof the depositsreviewed,are designated erty canlead to misleadingresultswhen comparing
asrare (r) in thatparticularenvironment. Theserare the chemistry of depositswith verydifferentconcen-
occurrences are regardedas not typicalof mineral trationsof manganese oxides.This situationcanbe
genesisandare thereforenot consideredin deriving readily overcomeby normalizingthe resultsagainst
the following mineralogicalsignatures.Similarly, the manganese contentof the deposit;failureto doso
mineralswhichare foundin a wide rangeof environ- canresultin the productionof apparentenrichments
mentsare not considered further,asthey are clearly or in obscuringreal enrichments(e.g., Nicholson,
of little diagnosticvalue,e.g., birnessiteis particu- 1992).
larly common,occurringasa primarycomponentin a The mineralogyof silicatelithologiescanbe an im-
variety of both supergeneand hydrothermalde- portantfactorin the creationandevaluation of geo-
posits. chemicalanomaliesin mineral exploration,and it
Bixbyite, braunitc, hausmannite,huebnerite, ja- may, therefore, be similarlyconsideredthat the
cobsite,andpyrochroitearedominantlyofhydrother- chemistryof manganese oxidesisdeterminedlargely
malorigin;whereaschalcophanite, coronadite,cred- by the mineralogy of the deposits.However,suchan
heritc, b-MnO2, groutitc, hollanditc,lithiophorite, assumption couldbe mistakensincethe manganese
manganite, nsutite, quenselite, ramsdellite, and mineralswhichcomposea depositarenotnecessarily
woodruffitcare supergene in nature.Romanechite is the primaryprecipitatesbecausethe mineralogyof
alsopredominantlysupergenein origin and rarely manganese oxidedepositsis commonlydetermined
12 5 6 KEITH NICHOLSON
T•.BI•2. Occurrence
of Manganese
Oxidesin Supergene
(S)andHydrothermal
(H) Depositional
Environments
TABLE
.2. (Cont,)
c = common;
r = rare;(referto relativeabundances
in deposits
described
in references
cited)
References:1 = Nahonetal.(1983);'2= Taylor(1968);3 = Taylor etal.(1964);4 = ChukhrovandGorshkov (1981);5 = Blainand
Andrew (1977);6 = Siderov
et al.(1980);7 = Nimfopouloset al.(1988);8 = Nimfopoulos andPattrick (1991);9 = Ostwald(1980,
1981);10 = MartandSass(1972);11 = Zantop (1978);12 = Ossa (1970);13 = Craiget al.(1982);14 = Bonattiet al.(1972);15 =
MargaritzandBrenner (1979);16= DeanandGhosh (1980);17= Calvert andPrice(1977);18= Burns andBurns (1977);19= Jenkyns
(1977);20 = Glasby andRead(1976);21 = Callender andBowset (1976);22 = BurnsandBurns (1979);23 = Baturin(1988);24 =
Nicholson(1988c);25= Nicholson (1988a);
26= Jones andMilne(1956);27= Chew(1978);28= Nicholson (1989b); 29= Nicholson
(1986);30 = Nicholson (1990);31 = Nicholson(1987a); 3.2= McKenzie (1980);33 = Hewettetal.(1963);34 = Haryia(1961);35 =
HeylandBozion (196.2);36= ButtandSmith (1980);37= Ashley (1980);38= Scott (1986);39= Carlson andSchwertmann (1987);40
= Boyle(1965);41 = CasadevallandOhmoto (1977);41 = Burbank (1933);42= TindieandWebb(1989);43 = TaylorandAppleyard
(1983);44 = Mosser andZeegers (1988);45 = Scott
andTaylor(1987);46 = vanMoort andSwensson (1984);47 = Nickel(1984);48 =
HewettandFleischer (1960);49 = Roy(1968);50 = PotterandRossman (1979a,b);51 = Nicholson (unpub.data);5.2= Taylor(1983);
53 = Goddard etal.(1987);54 = Pattan(1988);55 = Corliss etal.(1978);56 = Alt(1988);57 = Hawker andThompson (1988);58 =
Rona(1984);59 = Royet al.(1990);60 = Bolton et al.(1988);61 = Le Suave et al.(1989);6.2= SozanskiandCronan (1979);63 =
Moorbyet al. (1984);64 = Bernatet al. (1989)
Na * marino • ß ß Pb
ß shallow marino ß ß
(wt% ß freshwater ß ß
A ß
A ß 10wt%.
2.0
ß ß AAA
ow 1000 ppm
øo•4i•ti•"
• "•:o 2'.0 '
Mg (wt%)
100 ppm-
is clearlyimportantin mineralexploration.
Although ß weathered
ß dubhite
dataon the chemistryof manganese oxidesderived 1 pprn.
o hot-spring
0 sedex
frommineralization arefew (analysesareusuallyre-
portedforheterogeneous mixturesofironandmanga-
neseoxides),thoseavailablehavebeenemployedto
derivea Pb-Znplot (Fig.3). Thissuccessfully sepa- 100'ppm 100'0
ppm 1•/o Zn
ratesthe dubhiteswhichplotin the highPb andZn
fields;in generaldubhitescontainmore than i wt FIG.3. Diagnosticplotto differentiatedubhitesfromothersu-
percentZn and/ori wt percentPb. Thiscut-•off may pergeneandhydrothermal oxides.
be reducedto a Pb concentration of 1,000 ppm(at
1% Zn), providedthe criteria describedaboveare
employedto eliminatethe marineoxideswhichover- the overlapof the freshwater, shallow-marine, and
lap this lower sectionof the dubhitefield. Interest- sedimentary
exhalativeoxidesprecludesthe useof
ingly,marine,freshwater,soil,weathering,andhot Figure 3 to recognizesuchdeposits.
springoxidesalsoplot in discreteareas.However,
GeochemicalAssociation
Signatures
Co+Ni
Normalization of the oxidechemistryagainstman-
(wt%)
ganesecontentcanproducea more clearlydefined
elementpattern;however,suchpatterns canbemore
0.1-
rigorouslyquantifiedby the useof statisticaltech-
niquesto producea geochemical association
signa-
ture. Correlationcoefficientsor factoranalysis are
two methodscommonly employed.The majorityof
quantitative
correlation analyses
reportedin theliter-
0.01- ature have been conducted on marine and fresh
wateroxides(Table4). Althoughcorrelations vary
betweendeposits,the followingsignificant
associa-
tionsare shownin the majorityof analyses:
super-
genefreshwater= Mn-Ba-Co-Cu-Ni-[Sr]-Zn, super-
genemarine = Mn-Co-Cu-Ni-[Zn],supergenedub-
FIG. 2. Diagnostic
plot to differentiatesupergene andhydro- Mn-As.
hite = Mn-Co-[Cu]-Ni-Pb-Zn,and hydrothermal=
thermalmanganese oxides.Notethatbecause of their highmetal
content,dubhitesplot in the hydrothermal field;however,these Bracketsindicatea possibleregularassociation but
canbe recognizedusingthePb-Znplotin Figure3. one whichis not reportedin all analyses.
This high-
1260 KEITH NICHOLSON
T•,BLV.
4. PositiveCorrelations
of Elementswith Manganese
in DifferentGeneticTypesof Deposit
T^BLE
5. Diagnostic
Mineralogical
andGeochemical
Signatures comemorewidelyavailable,thistechniquedeserves
to DiscriminateManganeseOxide Depositsof Different
Metallogenesis
considerationin the evaluationof oxidegenesis.
In mineralexploration,manganese oxidesareoften
Supergene-hydrothermal
(S-H) regardedasubiquitous weatheringproductsof little
Mineralogy consequence. However, extensive,well-developed
Supergene:chalcophanite,
coronadire,crednerite,&MnO•, outcropsof manganese oxidescanbe derivedfrom
groutite,hollandite,
lithiophorite,
manganite, the oxidationof bothAu-Ag-andPb-Zn-bearing min-
nsutite,quenselite,ramsdellite,woodruffite,
(romanechite) eralizedsequences, andassuchtheydeservegreater
Hydrothermal:bixbyite,braunite,hausmannite, hiibnerite, attentionin an explorationprogram.It is important,
jacobsite,pyrochroite however, if misleadinginterpretationsare to be
Geochemical enrichments
avoided,that the significanceof manganeseoxide
Supergene: Co-Ni
Hydrothermal: As-Ba-Cu-Li-Mo-Pb-Sb-Sr-V-Zn outcropsisnotassessed usingchemicalcriteriadevel-
Geochemical associations opedon silicateor ironstonelithologies.The adsorp-
Supergene: Mn-Co-Cu-Ni-Zn tion propertiesof the oxidesraisethe thresholdof
Hydrothermal:Mn-As significanceof manyelements,relativeto that used
Diagnosticplot on conventional samples,suchthatwhatwouldbe an
(Co+ Ni) vs.(As+ Cu + Mo + Pb + V + Zn) [Fig.2]
anomalous concentration ofatargetorpathfinderele-
Supergenemarine-terrestrial(SM•-ST) ment in a silicate rock or ironstone is within the back-
Mineralogy groundrangefor a manganiferous lithology.Thispar-
No diagnostic
mineralassemblage
Geochemical enrichments ticularlyapplieswhenevaluatingmanganiferous gos-
Marine: Na-K-Ca-Mg-Sr;Co-Cu-Ni sans;the presenceof manganese oxideswill distort
Terrestrial: Ba anomalous signaturesdevelopedon, and designed
Geochemical associations
for, conventionalgossans.In suchcircumstances, ap-
Marine: No reliablediagnostic
association
Terrestrial: Mn-Ba plicationof the dubhiterecognitioncriteria(Table3)
Diagnosticplot to a mineralogicaland geochemicalanalysisof the
Navs. Mg [Fig. 1] separatedmanganese oxideswill be more revealing
Supergene-dubhite
(S-Sa) thanattemptsto interpretbulk analyses of an iron-
Mineralogy manganese oxidemixture.
Dubbite: chalcophanite,
coronadite,
hetaerolite,andother
Zn-Pb-(Cu?)-bearingoxides(e.g., crednerite, Acknowledgments
woodruffite)
in dubbites
overbasemetaldeposits
Geochemical enrichments I am gratefulto two EconomicGeologyreviewers
Dubhite: Pb-Zn for helpful,criticalcomments
on the originalmanu-
Geochemical associations
script.
Dubbite:Mn-Pb-(base
metals)
Diagnosticplot REFERENCES
Pb vs.Zn [Fig. 3]
Ajmal, M., 1990, Trace-elementstudyof manganese oresof the
Supergene marine-hydrothermal
sedex(SM,m-Hseaex) Barbilarea,Keonjhardistrict,Orissa,India:MineraliumDepo-
Mineralogy sita, v. 25, p. 160-162.
SeeS-H mineralassemblagesabove(geochemistrymore Alt, J. C., 1988, Hydrothermal oxideandnontronitedeposits on
reliable) seamounts in the easternPacific:MarineGeology,v. 81, p. 227-
Geochemical enrichments 239.
Supergene:Fe/Mn • 1; Na-K-Ca-Mg-Sr;Co-Cu-Ni Andrew,R. L., 1984,Supergene
alteration
andgossan texturesof
Hydrothermal:0.1 > Fe/Mn > 10; As-Ba-Cu-Li-Mo-Pb-Sb- base-metaloresin southern
Africa:MineralsSci.Eng.,v. 12, p.
Sr-V-Zn 193-215.
Geochemical associations
Ashley,P.M., 1980, Geologyof the BanBanzinc deposit,a sul-
Supergene: Mn-Co-Cu-Ni-Zn fide-bearingskarn, southeastQueensland,Australia:ECON.
Hydrothermal:Mn-As GEOL.,v. 75, p. 15-29.
Diagnosticplot Ballantyne,
J.M., andMoore,J.N., 1988,Arsenicgeochemistry in
Fe-Mn-10(Co+ Cu + Ni); Si vs.A1;Fe/Ti vs.A1/ geothermalsystems:Geochim.et Cosmochim. Acta,v. 52, p.
(A1+ Mn + Fe) 475-483.
Baturin,G. N., 1988,The geochemistry
of manganeseandmanga-
nesenodulesin the ocean:Dordrecht,Reidel,342 p.
Bernat,M., Causse,C., Perseil,E. A., andFeraud, G., 1989, Varia-
to definegeochemicalassociations
hasbeenlargely tionsof elementdistribution
in ferromanganese
nodulesandits
neglected,yet thismethodcanassist the interpreta- bearingon growthrates:MineraliumDeposita,v. 24, p. 258-
tionof geochemicalenrichmentsignatures andaddi- 269.
Simmons,S. F., and Browne,P. R. L., 1990, Mineralogic,alter- vanMoort,J. C., andSwensson, C. G., 1982, The oxidizedzoneof
ation and fluid-inclusion
studiesof epithermalgold-bearing the BrokenHill lode,N.S.W.,in Amstutz,G. C., E1Goresy,A.,
veinsat the Mt. Muro prospect,centralKalimantan(Borneo), Frenzel, G., Kluth, C., Moh, G., Wauschkuhn,A., andZimmer-
Indonesia:Jour.Geochem.Explor.,v. 35, p. 63-103. mann,R. A., eds., Ore genesis:The stateof the art: Berlin,
Sozanski,A. G., andCronan,D. S.,1979,Ferromanganese concre- Springer-Verlag,p. 251-268.
tionsin Shebandowan Lakes,Ontario:Canadian Jour.EarthSci., -- 1984, The gossan at BrokenHill: Jour.Geochem.Explor.,v.
v. 16, p. 126-140. 22, p. 355-356.
Taylor,G. R., 1983, Manganese oxidemineralogy in anexhalative Varnavas, S.P., Papaioannau, J., andCatani,J., 1988,A hydrother-
environment fromtheSolomon Islands: MineraliumDeposita,v. mal manganese depositfrom the Eratosthenes seamount, east-
18, p. 113-125. ern Mediterranean Sea:MarineGeology,v. 81, p. 205-214.
Taylor,G. F., andAppleyard,E. C., 1983, Weatheringof the Zn- Vasari,Y., Kolijonen,T., andLaakso,K., 1972, A caseof manga-
Pb lode,DugaldRiver,NW Queensland, I. The gossan profile: neseprecipitatein the Taviharjaesker, Kuusamo,north-east
Jour.Geochem.Explor.,v. 18, p. 87-110. Finland:Geol.Soc.FinlandBull.,v. 44, p. 133-140.
Taylor, G. F., and Scott,K. M., 1982, Evaluationof gossans in Webster,J. G., 1989, The solubilityof As2Sa andspeciation of Asin
relation to lead-zinc mineralisationin the Mount Isa inlier, diluteandsulphide-bearing fluidsat 25 and90øC:Geochim.et
Queensland: BMRJour.Australian GeologyGeophysics, v. 7, p. Cosmochim. Acta,v. 54, p. 1009-1017.
159-180. Webster,J. G., andMann,A. W., 1984, The influenceof climate,
Taylor,R. M., 1968, The association of Mn andCo in soils--fur- geomorphology andprimarygeologyon the supergene migra-
ther observations: Jour.SoilSci.,v. 19, p. 77-80. tionof goldandsilver:Jour.Geochem. Explor.,v. 22, p. 21-42.
Taylor,R. M., McKenzie,R. M., andNorrish,1964, The mineral- Whitney,P. R., 1981, Heavymetalsandmanganese oxidesin the
ogyandchemistryof manganese in someAustraliansoils:Aus- Genesee watershed, New YorkState:Effectof geologyandland
tralianJour.SoilResearch, v. 2, p. 235-248. use:Jour.Geochem.Explor.,v. 14, p. 95-117.
Tindie, A. G., and Webb, P. C., 1989, Niobian wolframite from Yariv, S., and Cross,H., 1979, Geochemistry of colloidsystems:
GlenGairnin the EasternHighlandsof Scotland: A microprobe Berlin,Springer-Verlag, 450 p.
investigation: Geochim.et Cosmochim. Acta, v. 53, p. 1921- Zantop,H., 1978, Geologicsettingandgenesis of ironoxidesand
1935. manganese oxidesin the San Franciscomanganesedeposit,
Usui, A., Mellin, T. A., Nohara, M., and Yuasa,M., 1989, Struc- Jalisco,Mexico:ECON.GEOId., v. 73, p. 1137-1149.
tural stabilityof marine10A manganates fromthe Ogasawara -- 1981,Traceelements in volcanogenic manganese oxidesand
(Bonin)arc:Implicationfor low-temperature hydrothermalac- ironoxides: the SanFrancisco manganese deposit,Jalisco, Mex-
tivity: MarineGeology,v. 86, p. 41-56. ico: ECON.GEoid.,v. 76, p. 545-555.