Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Emily Jane Observation
Emily Jane Observation
Jonathan B. Wood
Emily Jane is a female nine year old from Las Vegas, Nevada. She is the older of two
children from a middle class family in a predominantly white neighborhood. Both parents are of
English decent and work full time jobs. Both parents are able to spend every evening and
weekends with their children and therefore maintain a healthy relationship with the little girl and
her brother.
the DSHS Fosterparentscope Child Development Guide. Having the observations then be
analyzed using theories of known psychologist to set a background into her identity and
understand where she is developmentally compared to others in her age range. Through several
interactions with the young child in their home, walking home from school and at play with her
friends, the observations made in the following paper identifies different characteristics of that
model and how they apply specifically to her comparatively to that of the model.
Further we explore how her needs are being met using Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and
how they contribute to her wellbeing. Finding ways that may help her continue to grow into a
young woman and answering questions about what could be done to aid her in the future.
Physical
Emily Jane appears to follow all of the normal characteristics outlined by the Child
Development Guide for nine to ten year olds. Her appearance actually looks a bit older than that
of the rest of the kids in her grade level. She has strong control over her actions and does not
stumble or fall when running or walking. Emily appears to always be aware of her surroundings
and those that are near her. On several occasions she will outrun her other friends and take the
lead when it comes to trying out activities that require some skill or strength. On one occurrence
EMILY JANE CASE STUDY 3
the other friends, including her younger brother, seemed to be having difficulty finding a toy in
the house. She was able to lift up small chairs and thick blankets that her friends just ignored or
struggled with.
At home Emily has been tasked with taking out the trash and watching and guiding the
family dog outside when he gets rowdy. The dog itself easily outweighs the little girl by several
pounds, yet it responds best to her and she is able to grab it by the collar and guide it outside.
She prides herself in other physical activities like karate. In her class she is steadily moving up
through the belts at a slightly above average rate compared to that of the other few females in the
class.
When characterizing Emily’s physical ability with Piaget theory, she may be suffering
from a form of egocentrism (Snowman, p. 27). Emily displays characteristics that suggest that
she thinks everyone is able to do the same sort of physical abilities she is capable of. When
letting out the dog she does not understand why her younger and weaker brother cannot do it and
why it is her responsibility to perform the task. This continues as well in her karate classes as
she continues to move up quickly through the ranks while other females of her age or older
continue to struggle.
characterizations. When comparing that to Maslow Hierarchy of needs she would be just below
realizing self-actualization. She feels strong and demonstrates this strength through actions that
are above her age level when looking at the Child Development Guide. She garners the respect
and the affection of others as she displays her unique abilities in karate and normal household
tasks.
EMILY JANE CASE STUDY 4
When reviewing Carol Gilligan’s theory on females (Snowman, p. 43) and how they go
about task management. Emily Jane’s physical development and how she displays her physical
adeptness compared to that of others seems to be on target. However, this could potentially be
shaken when others, such as her brother, gain strength and her body can no longer perform tasks
that she used to feel superior in. In the event of this occurring it would result in her falling on
Emotional
According to the Child Development guide, Emily appears to be following many of the
characteristics of a normal female in her age range. She displays a lot of dependable and
trustworthy acts with her friends. Allowing them to borrow and use her belongings without any
hesitation and always thinking the best of them. She does not worry about them ruining her
items or even possibly losing them. Her greatest obstacle to her emotional stability comes from
her brother. She by all accounts seems to have the most emotional stress when dealing with him,
as he is younger but is very much more aggressive and physical then she is.
When her younger sibling does something she does not agree with she becomes
increasingly agitated and emotional if it does not work out in her favor. She resorts to throwing
tantrums and seeking her parents for conflict resolution. However, when the parents side with
the brother she will begin to cry and scurry off to her bedroom for solitude and independence.
When at play with others if they do not immediately accept her ideas she will traditionally follow
the lead of another, but then subtlety try and implement what her original idea was.
According to Piaget, Emily is at often times displaying characteristics that may be above
her own age level. When looking at the Formal Operational Stage (Snowman, p. 28), Emily is
engaging in different types of mental manipulations in order to achieve some of the results she
EMILY JANE CASE STUDY 5
seeks. By allowing others to take the lead and subtly changing what they are doing to what she
had originally planned shows a higher level of thinking. Her actions go unnoticed by her peers
In review of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, she is attaining the belongingness and love
that is required for her journey to self-actualization. Though emotionally she may be struggling
with the self-esteem that is needed because she continues to throw tantrums when the outcome
she desires does not occur. Emotionally, can one ever truly reach self-actualization? There are
too many variables and obstacles that would get in the way.
According to Snowman, Emily Jane is highly influenced by the attitudes of her parents
and therefore are in line with where she needs to be in her emotional state (Snowman p.57). As
she progresses this direction she will continue to seek out their guidance and base her emotional
wellbeing on if she is pleasing them or not. The long term effects of her emotional state will
Intellectual/Cognitive
Emily Jane has a very high curiosity about a great many things and is questioning things
all the time rather than just accepting things as the way that they are. On several occurrences she
will be reading or watching something on television and turn away and ask a question pertaining
to what it was she had just read or watched. This is especially true when her parents are
watching more adult based programs where the subject matter would be over her head. As a
family they watch the television show Survivor and Doctor Who. She will often ask them to
pause the program to ask why a character would do this or that because she didn’t catch on to the
She particularly has a high interest in art and is constantly asking to work in her art
studio. Her parents set up a little corner of her bedroom with an easel so that she can pursue that
interest. It has been something she is deeply passionate about and spends a great deal of time
working on. Surprisingly it has not been a fleeting hobby or something she has grown out of as
she has continued to work on it for over two years now. She allows her imagination to take flight
as she paints and draws out whatever she can think of. According to the Child Development
Guide it is abundantly clear to me that she not only meets the traditional intellectual guidelines
Regarding the findings of such theories regarding child development, Piaget suggests that
Emily has in fact mastered the skill of decentration (Snowman, p. 26). As described in the book,
it is the ability to think of more than one quality of an object or a problem at a time. She masters
the ability of staying passionate about her painting yet still obtaining the skills to leave it for a
time and return to it later. When examining Vygotsky theory on spontaneous concepts
(Snowman, p. 34) we learn that Emily is gaining knowledge through communicating with her
parents while she watches television shows. She is doing this unconsciously and as she goes
(Snowman p.74), which claims that intelligence is composed of creative, practical and analytical
components, that Emily is in fact showing all of three of these messages. Her ability to
comprehend what is occurring on the television program is using all three of the abilities he
describes.
Practical – She seeks the relevance of the situation on the program to the overall
Analytical – She compares them to other things that she has experienced or other
When comparing Emily’s growth with that of Gardener’s multiple intelligences theory
(Snowman p.75), one could claim that Emily might fall into the category of someone whom is
Intrapersonal. She is aware of her own feelings and uses her own self-awareness to determine
the best way to go about gaining the knowledge she desires or the space that she requires. Her
use of painting indicates that she likes to be in her head with her thoughts and imagination. It is
a time for her to use self-reflection and express herself in a way that does not rely on anyone
else.
Hierarchy of Needs. Her abilities regarding intelligence and cognitive displays seem to be met
on all of the categories underneath it. She has a high amount of self-esteem when it comes to her
homework and her ability to understand a situation or a problem, as well as being motivated to
acting at a higher level of development. It appears that she has reached a more formal
operational where we see her deal with problems systematically and able to engage is some
mental manipulations. As she continues to grow older she would be able to form hypotheses
quicker and discover answers to her problems herself by continually asking questions and
Social
When interacting with peers of her age and younger, Emily tends to prefer group
activities. She constantly is trying to have a more dominant leadership role and have her friends
do things that she is interested in doing. As per the normal for a child of her age, she best
interacts with children of her same sex as they seem to identify more together with similar
interests. In the observation that took place after school hours and heading home, only a few
male classmates would interact and say goodbye to her, yet nearly every female classmate would
say goodbye and that they would see her later. Many would give her a hug or just wave as they
Though as mentioned in the Intellectual portion of this paper, she prefers to keep to
herself and not share many of her art pieces with others. It is one of the times she prefers little to
no social interactions and likes to do things for herself. She will even shy away from displaying
her art to her peers and even at times to her family members. This is one of the few
characteristics that are different than that of the DSHS Fosterparentscope Child Development
Guide regarding Social Development for her age and sex. She further displays this anti-social
behavior at karate where she only interacts with her brother on a social level. She is encouraged
to display her skill with others, and does so with them, but tends not to speak to her fellow karate
Erikson’s psychosocial development might suggest that Emily could possibly be suffering
from role confusion (Snowman p.19). This is when one is uncertain of what behaviors will be
looked at favorable from others. I could see how this comes into play with her skill in karate.
She could be perhaps intimidated by interacting with male or female counterparts that she had
just dominated over in the dojo. Unsure if by beating them that they would have no interests in
EMILY JANE CASE STUDY 9
being her friend and that the exercise was not a competition but just a practice to hone her own
skill.
Marcia’s notion of Identity Statuses (Snowman p. 20) lead this research to believe that
Emily is part of the Moratorium stage (Snowman, p. 21). She displays qualities that suggest that
she has given some thought to her identity and is still questioning them. She is unsure of some
of her social interactions and is hesitant to share everything she knows or has done. At times
questioning if she really likes a person or a situation that she is in and if she would like to
Socially it would appear that her feelings of belongingness are not being met on the
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs for this category. She is constantly unsure of where her place is
and if she is fitting in with her competitors in her class. This is especially true in regards to boys
in general. She displays an awkward shyness that may stem from her parents or from her own
self-doubts about what is expected of her when speaking with the opposite sex. Deciding to
avoid most interactions with boys we see her continually move closer to the other females in her
age range.
According to Snowman, this is perfectly natural for a child of nine years of age as
friendships become more selective and gender based (Snowman p. 57). This would undoubtable
continue through her adolescence and well into her young teenage years. Findings show that
females within this age range begin to try and find others that identify with them on not only a
physical level but also on an emotional level. We can suspect that this behavior will continue for
Moral
The DSHS Foster parent scope Child Development Guide suggests that children in the
subject’s age range are very competitive; this is a characteristic that is not presented by Emily.
While her younger sibling continually tries to show how strong and competitive he is, she often
ignores it and rather congratulates him on his wins or loses. She enjoys the competition but
tends to view it as more of game for the sake of playing rather than an act of who may be
superior to the other. Also she has no issues accepting her mistakes and fessing up to them. It
appears this may because in the past and from watching her other sibling, the consequences for
lying about something seems harsher to her than the initial reprimand would be. Speaking with
the parents makes this more abundantly clear as they themselves have repeatedly told me that
they are ok with mistakes that the children make if the tell them right away before the issue
becomes worse.
Emily Jane easily fits into Piaget theory regarding adaptation (Snowman, p. 23). She is
able to see exactly what her younger brother had done and quickly adjusts her behavior to try and
not follow the same course of action that the sibling took. Taking advantage of the real world
situation and applying them to herself to avoid an unfavorable outcome. Also, one could stress
that Emily Jane still may suffer from Piaget idea of Morality of Constraint (Snowman, p.41) as
she still believes that all rules are established by someone in a person of power or authority.
Thus trying to conform to what they want by not questioning the rules.
This way of thinking leads into Kohlberg’s six stages of moral reasoning and having
Emily fall into the idea of conventional morality (Snowman p. 42) where she is trying to impress
others with her respect for their authority and play it safe. By observing the misbehavior of
others she is trying to attain a better perception for herself. In many respects this also can be
EMILY JANE CASE STUDY 11
seen in Gilligan’s theory (Snowman, p 43) regarding female behavior. Gilligan claims that
woman care less about independence and more about remaining loyal. This could be the
reasoning Emily Jane prefers to adapt her behavior so that she will remain in that favorable
condition that her parents would view as being an obedient and well behaved child. Another
theory by Nel Noddings suggest that this could also be regarded to her caring tendencies
(Snowman, p 43). Which claims that a care theory is based off of relationships. Emily Jane
moral adaptation could be one because she cares about her parents perceptions of her and that
she continually is craving a deep caring relationship about what she is doing.
These contributing factors are showing that her Self-Esteem is rather high for her
morality. She is very confident and does not need to engage in fruitless labors of competition but
rather be happy about just playing the game in general. Her interactions suggest that she is more
satisfied with other females of her age level. With regards to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs,
According to Erikson and followed up by James Marcis suggest that she has developed a
good sense of identity (Snowman, p. 21). Since this case study began, she has shown
exceptional growth in this field by continually choosing to invest in her own beliefs that further
her moral strengths. As she continues down this path it would by all accounts appear that she
Summary
Emily Jane shows many of the general characteristics of a healthy developing nine year
old child. Often she takes the time to assist others and help them out with activates or duties
around the house. The relationship she has built with her brother was an interesting one to
observe as there is a lot of give and take between the two of them. Together the pair seem to be
EMILY JANE CASE STUDY 12
each other’s best friend, but from that dynamic you can also tell in many ways she feels like his
guardian but also feels protected from her younger brother. They both look out for one another
in a strong bond that is very endearing and speaks levels to where she is at in the DSHS
Having the viewpoints and theories of many Psychologist enrich the text and are able to
help us discern a clear picture of what is occurring with the young woman as she grows. These
theories provide an ample amount of evidence and depth to what is occurring in the mind of
Emily Jane and gives an insightful look into the mind of the child.
The findings suggest that she is highly intellectual but suffers mildly on the moral scale.
Not in a severely negative way. Just that she does not engage in the typical competitiveness that
is suggested by the study. Her placement in the Physical, Social, Emotional side of the
developmental guide seems to be accurate and acceptable for her age. All accounts point to her
References
DSHS Fosterparentscope (1993) “Development Milestones for a Child nine to ten years”,
Retrieved from
http://depts.washington.edu/allcwe2/fosterparents/training/cdevguid/cdg11.htm