MOHD AZNE BIN MOHD YUNOS 2007269272

EMD 4M1
GROUP 5

Calculation:

The result:

The theoretical calculation.

Angle, θ q(cm) (cm) (cm/s) (cm/s2)

0 0.054 27.446 0 -11.29
15 0.38 27.120 -2.90 -10.62
30 1.49 26.010 -5.45 -8.72
45 3.18 24.320 -7.37 -5.81
60 5.236 22.264 -8.45 -2.38
75 7.472 20.028 -8.62 0.97
90 9.726 17.774 -8.00 3.60
105 11.69 15.810 -6.83 5.13
120 13.272 14.228 -5.41 5.63
135 14.508 12.992 -3.94 5.50
150 15.344 12.156 -2.55 5.14
165 15.836 11.664 -1.25 4.83
180 16.18 11.320 0 4.69
195 15.836 11.664 1.25 4.83
210 15.544 11.956 2.53 5.12
225 14.49 13.010 3.94 5.50
240 13.308 14.192 5.41 5.63
255 11.708 15.792 6.83 5.13
 270 9.8 17.700 8.00 3.62
285 7.636 19.864 8.63 1.00
300 5.362 22.138 8.46 -2.37
315 3.272 24.228 7.38 -5.82
330 2.108 25.392 5.50 -8.78
345 0.472 27.028 2.90 -10.64
360 0.054 27.446 0 -11.29

The sample of the theoretical calculation:

Given:

When θ = 30 , r = 8 cm, L = 19.5 cm, q = 1.49 cm, ω = 1 rad/s

x = (r + l) – q = 26.010 cm
When θ = 30 , r = 8 cm, L= 19.5 cm, q = 1.49 cm, ω = 1 rad/s, x = (r + l) – q = 26.010 cm,

Graph displacement, x vs. angle, θ

30

25
Displacement, x

20

15

10

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Angle, θ

The graph A : the displacement (x) Vs angle

 Graph velocity vs. angle, θ

8
6
4
2
0
Velocity

-2 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
Angle, θ

The graph B: the velocity ( ) Vs angle

The sample of the experimental calculation:

From x  f ( )

dx dx d dx
 x 
dt

dt

dt

d


Where, dx = q the change of the displacement. At  = 1 rad/s constant.

 = 30  ; q = 1.49 cm

2.846 cm/s
From,
dx dx d dx
x     
dt dt dt d

Differentiate again, we get

dx  dx  d  dx   d  dx  d  d  dx 
x                
2

dt  dt  dt  d   dt  d  dt  d  d 

Where, dx = q the change of the displacement. At  = 1 rad/s constant.

 = 30  ; q = 1.49 cm ;

5.435 cm/s2
Discussion:

 There are totally different between the experimental values and the theoretical values.
This is due to the errors that occurred during taking the readings at the slider’s ruler. My
suggestion, how to reduce the errors on the slider crank mechanism:

o Check and maintain regularly to make sure that it is precise and accurate all the
time.

o To run smoothly without any disturbance due to rust or wear.

o More carefully while taking the readings at the slider’s ruler.

 From experiment result, the result that we get is different from theoretical result when
compared its value of velocity and acceleration, which has a lot percentage error. Graph
A shows that the values of velocity (experiment). It gradually declines from angle 00 to
1800 (minimum point), when 1800 to 3600 the value of velocity is gradually incline.

 Graph B shows that the value of acceleration (experiment) is gradually inclined from
angle 1650 to 2800 (maximum point), when 2800 to 3600 the value of acceleration is
gradually declined.

 From all graphs the comparison that we can make, the formation of the graph is not
similar between experiment and theoretical results.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the position and displacement is the most important thing that considered
in this experiment. It has a big relation to the velocity and acceleration that is why the movement
of the velocity and acceleration not moved smoothly. When we do this experiment, we have tried
to achieve the minimum value of the error, so that the best value can be found. This application
also can use in hydraulic cylinder equipment example like backhoe that can arrange to give it a
wide range of operating position.