Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) 1st July 2018 - GSoA Fire
Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) 1st July 2018 - GSoA Fire
Meeting Minutes (DRAFT) 1st July 2018 - GSoA Fire
30pm
Attendees
Gill Hutchison (Chair),
Adrian Nairn (Garnethill Displaced Residents Group),
Sgt. Stephen McAllister,
PC Robert Hill,
Pauline McNeill MSP,
Two representatives from Charing Cross Housing Association,
Cllr. Eva Bolander (Lord Provost),
Cllr. Angus Millar,
Cllr. Philip Braat (Depute Lord Provost),
Cllr. Susan Aitken (Leader, GCC),
Annemarie O’Donnell (Chief Executive, GCC),
Raymond Barlow (GCC, Building Control, Assistant head of planning),
Dominic Dowling (GCC, Economic Development - Business Liaison),
Alan Horn (GSoA),
Chirsty Hamilton (Garnethill Multicultural Centre),
Jane Sutherland (Garnethill CC),
Chris Collins (Blythswood & Broomielaw CC),
Irene Loudon (Blythswood & Broomielaw CC),
Sean Mackay,
Jamie (Hellfre Club).
Apologies
Alison Thewliss MP, Adam Tomkins MSP, Martyn McIntyre, Scott McMaster, Ian Gordon,
Cllr. Christy Mearns.
Meeting Details.
Chris Collins:
• Ran through the list of “Common Questions” (see next page), requesting written
answers from the relevant panel members.
• Detailed solutions to these questions may not be known, however it is important that a
way is found to communicate progress on the issues automatically, pro-actively.
• ACTION: Chris to make sure that 4 relevant email groups are included for updates.
• Chris Collins corrected the record that in fact apologies had been received las week
from Cllr. Philip Braat, but he had accidentally ommitted them.
• Progress report since last week:- Communications have been established with
relevant GGC ofcials elected members and leadership. A disbursement of GBP3,000
has been announced (more info later on)..
Common Questions: Garmethill Multicultural Centre, 1st July – 2.30pm
Those present do not necessarily expect full answers today on every point; but they need to know
how to get those answers; who is going to provide them? This must be done pro-actively, and
automatically disseminated; NOT everybody individually having to telephone.
1//
Access - Is there yet a date or an estimated date for work starting on taking down unsafe walls?
Estimated dates for short accompanied access in the different areas around the Mackintosh?
->Ideally before complete demolition, once the Mackintosh is lowered to a certain point.
HOW will people be told when this is allowed?
2//
Is there a timescale estimate for a walkway along the south side of Sauchiehall St.?
HOW will people and businesses be notified?
3//
Regarding the £3,000 - how do residents get it?
Do households get all of it, or ‘up to’ that amount?
HOW will residents be told how to claim?
Regarding the £165 bill for door-repair, why was this billed to residents and who is going to pay?
4//
Security – why is the site not as secure as it could be?
• First hand report from the cordon: no staff at several barrier points.
• No protection at rear of some properties.
• There could be a better police presence.
• Patrols can not cover the entire site, due to the hazardous nature.
• Site security at specific points on the cordon could be increased by the use of self-powered
automatic alerting equipment.
NB: To our knowledge, no residents have ‘broken through the cordon’ or been arrested. Some
“revellers” were intercepted about a week ago…
5//
Insurance - Homeowners + businesses in many cases are apparently not being covered.
Alison Thewliss MP has led this effort, but who on Glasgow City Council is sorting this out?
6//
Business Rates – most businesses are aware of the rates rebate, but this does not affect many of
them, because they are too small to pay Business Rates anyway!
Can rent relief be sought?
Relocaton allowances?
7//
Why was the organisational aftermath of this fire allowed to develop in such a way?
(This is a crisis which requires a national-level response.)
Many pieces of the project are interlocking: bottlenecks can be eased by good management.
Communication has been lacking.
8//
A supplemental question submitted by a landlord (a written reply would be ok if no time spare):
I am a landlord … and I am trying my best to support my tenants, but as I am sure you appreciate
this is not easy. Could I ask if the reported financial support is available for landlords or tenants or
both, and how we can claim for this support? Also my flats are very different in size is the financial
support per property, or per resident?
On relevant questions, written responses from the panel should be sent to:-
babccglasgow@gmail.com, garnethill.cc@gmail.com, gdrg2018@gmail.com, ssicb@outlook.com
and posted on the Garnethill Displaced Residents Facebook page.
Sgt. McAllister (Police Scotland):
• Comments around security.
• Crime prevention survey provided recommendations. As a result site security was increased.
• There have been a couple of minor breaches, not resulting in any break-ins, and
nothing criminal since the Campus Bar incident.
• Regarding the Fire: Fire service is leading, Police Scotland are assisting investigation.
• Nothing to suggest criminal actvity yet.
• Residents and businesses are urged to supply footage or information to 101 or the
officers at Douglas St.
• In response to a comment that 10 people had breached security on Saturday, he advised he
would follow up.
Raymond Barlow (Building Control, GCC), with comments from Alan Horn:
• Comments around security: where cordon has been breached, they have fixed it and will
continue to work with police.
• There is on-site security, with line-of-sight, and mobile CCTV, plus wardens.
• Comments around physical works: start-date Monday 2nd July.
• Works commencing with South elevation, as this is highest risk section.
• Proceeding to East and West elevations, which will be looked at.
• Contractor must re-assess as they go, an iterative process.
• More information will come as they progress.
• Can not as-yet take the risk of any public access.
• In response to a question, the East elevation has moved ~6”.
• A Member of the Public complained about their enquiry having received no follow-up from
Building Control / Brian Tierney.
• In response to a question, Muriel Gray was alowed access when the Fire Service had control
of the site.
• Since GCC has had control, there has been uniformly NO ACCESS except to the
surveyors/demolition contractor.
• The damage to GSoA was a lot worse than hoped.
• If security staff are walking in danger areas, this is not acceptable.
• Access is not even possible with Police or Fire Service accompanying.
• A question was raised regarding speed of demolition – would it be archaeological /
preservatory or as rapid as possible?
• Finials would be lifted off, but the rest “put-in” (demolished) into to the structure.
• Alan Horn (GSoA) stepped in:- For the avoidance of all doubt, the intention is to
facilitate the downtaking a.s.a.p. This is the quickest & safest way.
• Raymond Barlow commented on Sauchiehall St.: looked at hoarding to open footpath,
being thought about, but due to danger of collapse can’t give a date yet.
There was an interjection from a member of the public regarding how an Avenues Project contractor
broke planning guidelines, dug a trench and disappeared. Is this money to reopen the street as
opposed to the Mackintosh? Susan Aitken responded that it was for the street, not the site.
Adrian Nairn (Garnethill Displaced Residents Group), plus some other residents:
• 17 days later, we are still waiting for a timeframe.
• Good coverage in the press.
• GBP3,000 is some good news.
• People still not getting what they need.
Private residents commented that:
• Initial responses from Councillors largely paid attention to the GSoA, not residents.
• No support over 17 days, and this is the first meeting at which we’ve had GCC officers.
• Residents have not been included in communications.
• Residents should be updated and included in all relevant discussions.
• Residents need to know news before the press knows!
• One resident was worried about losing her job, and needed a letter explaining her
circumstances from GCC.
• Distressed about not having access to personal posessions, and worried about security.