A.

CLASSROOM AWARD

1. PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT AWARDS FOR KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 3

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 1. List of Performance Awardees for Kindergarten to Grade 3

Descriptive Rating Performance Descriptive Rating Conduct Awards

for the Awards (Skills) - for the Conduct
No. Names of Kindergarten Learners Performance (For Kindergarten Awards (K to Grde (Character Traits)
Awards (For K to Grade 3
only) 3)
Kindergarten only)

Male
Matapat Award,
Budding
1 ACABAL, JAKE L. HAD Mathematician Honest, Responsible Batang Maasahan
Award

2 ONDA, MARLON C. SD Patient Mr. Patience

3 TORREGOSA, FRANK T. SDD Kind Golden Heart Award
4 VIDAL, JULIUS S. SAD Helpful Happy Helper Award
Female
Public Speaker Initiative, Good in Sparkler Award,
1 ABESAMES, FLOR F. HAD Award, Graceful Leadership Little Teacher Award
Dancer award

Awesome Artist Batang Maasahan

2 CATAP, MARY G. HAD Award, Star Reader Responsible Award
Award

3 DIOLA, RHEA D. SD
4 FONTELO, RHONA X. SAD Kind Golden Heart Award

Budding Scientist Batang Magalang

5 ZOILO, MARIETA U. HAD Award Courteous Award
Prerequisite Form:
1. Checklist
Legend:
HAD - Highly Advanced Development
SAD - Slight Advanced Development
AD - Average Development
SD - Slight Delay in Overall Development
SDD - Significant Delay in Overall Development

Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016 - all pupils will be listed.
2. Since kindergarten learners have no numerical grades, teachers are advised to recognize outstanding
achievement of learners based on the different domains and/or learning competencies of the
kindergarten curriculum at the end of every quarter.

3. Since all learners must be given equal opportunity to excel and demonstrate their strengths, an award
may be given to more than one learner.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

_________________________ _________________________
Adviser Principal I

_________________________
Teacher Approved:

_________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
A. CLASSROOM AWARD

2. CONDUCT AWARDS

2.1. CONDUCT AWARDS FOR KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 3

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 1. List of Conduct Awardees for Kindergarten to Grade 3

No. Names of Learners CHARACTER TRAITS Conduct Awards

Male
1 ABIAN, JOSEPH G. ACTIVE EAGER BEAVER AWARD

2 DELIMA, ROLANDO W. CHEERFULNESS CHEERFUL SOUL AWARD

3 DOMINISE, MARK S. TEAM PLAYER TEAM PLAYER AWARD

4 ESTROSOS, ELBERT H. COOPERATION COLLABORATIVE KID AWARD

5 HANDOG, JAMES T. FRIENDLINESS FRIENDLY NEIGHBOR AWARD

6 IGNACIO, RUEL T. GENTLENESS PEACE MAKER AWARD

7 POE, RICARDO Q. HARDWORKING TASK CHAMP AWARD
8 TARUC, LUISITO T. HELPFULNESS HAPPY HELPER AWARD
Female
1 BESAS, CHEILO F. HONESTY MATAPAT AWARD
2 CASAS, LORNA D. INITIATIVE SPARKLER AWARD
3 DUMANON, ELISA F. KINDNESS GOLDEN HEART AWARD
4 FUGOSO, SHERLY C. LEADERSHIP LITTLE TEACHER AWARD
Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016

2. These awards are given to younger learners to affirm their positive traits and
attitudes or to recognize significant improvement in their behavior.

3. Teachers can
choose from, but are not limited to, the character traits listed in Appendix 2.
4. They also have the option to provide creative or unique titles for each award appropriate to their
context and community.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC) Recommending Approval:

_____________________ _____________________
Adviser Principal I

_____________________
Teacher Approved:

_____________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
A. CLASSROOM AWARD

2. CONDUCT AWARDS

2.2. CONDUCT AWARDS FOR GRADES 4 TO 12

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 1. List of Conduct Awardees for Grades 4 to 12

Number of AOs Rating

Names of Grades 4 to from Core Values Descriptive Rating for the
No. Conduct Awards (For Conduct Awards
12 Pupils/Students (Section VI of DepEd Grade 4 to 12)
Order No. 8, s. 2015)

Male
Shows adherence to
1 ABIAN, JOSEPH G. 21/28 ethical principles by Matapat Award
upholding truth

Exercises the rights

and responsibilities of BatangAward
Makabansa
2 DELIMA, ROLANDO W. 22/28
a Filipino

3 DOMINISE, MARK S. 18/28

Sensitive to Batang Magalang

4 ESTROSOS, ELBERT H. 27/28 individual, social and Award
cultural differences

Expresses one's
spiritual beliefs while Batang Magalang
5 HANDOG, JAMES T. 22/28 respecting the Award
spiritual beliefs of
others

6 IGNACIO, RUEL T. 20/28

Sensitive to Batang Magalang

7 POE, RICARDO Q. 21/28 individual, social and Award
cultural differences

Sensitive to Batang Magalang

8 TARUC, LUISITO T. 21/28 individual, social and Award
cultural differences

Female

Sensitive to Batang Magalang

1 BESAS, CHEILO F. 25/28 individual, social and Award
cultural differences
 Cares for the
environment and
utilizes resources
wisely, judiciously,
and economically; Eco-Friendly Award;
2 CASAS, LORNA D. 24/28 Demonstrates
appropriate behavior Ambassador Award
in carrying out
activities in the
school, community,
and country

3 DUMANON, ELISA F. 15/28

Demonstrates
4 FUGOSO, SHERLY C. 27/28 contributions toward Team Player Award
solidarity
Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016
2. Conduct Awards for grades 4 to 12 in each class will be given at the end of the school year. This will be
based on the evaluation of the adviser and subject teachers, using the guidelines stipulated in Section VI
of DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015.
2. Awardees must have consistently and dutifully carried out the core values of the Department as
indicated in the report card.

3. They must have obtained a rating of at least 75% “Always Observed” (AO) at the end of the school year
(with at least 21 out of 28 AO rating in the report card).

4. They also must have not been sanctioned with offenses punishable by suspension or higher sanction
within the school year according to the Department’s service manual and child protection policies.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

_____________________ _____________________
Adviser Principal I

_____________________
Teacher Approved:

_____________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
A. CLASSROOM AWARD

2. CONDUCT AWARDS

2.2. CONDUCT AWARDS FOR GRADES 4 TO 12

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 1. List of Character Traits Awardees for Grades 4 to 12

Number of AOs Rating

Names of Grades 4 to from Core Values Descriptive Rating for the
No. Conduct Awards (For Conduct Awards
12 Pupils/Students (Section VI of DepEd Grade 4 to 12)
Order No. 8, s. 2016)
Shows adherence to
1 ABIAN, JOSEPH G. 21/28 ethical principles by Matapat Award
upholding truth

Sensitive to Batang Magalang

2 BESAS, CHEILO F. 25/28 individual, social and Award
cultural differences

Cares for the

environment and
utilizes resources
wisely, judiciously,
and economically; Eco-Friendly Award;
3 CASAS, LORNA D. 24/28 Demonstrates Ambassador Award
appropriate behavior
in carrying out
activities in the
school, community,
and country

Exercises the rights

and responsibilities of BatangAward
Makabansa
4 DELIMA, ROLANDO W. 22/28
a Filipino

Sensitive to Batang Magalang

5 ESTROSOS, ELBERT H. 27/28 individual, social and Award
cultural differences

Demonstrates
6 FUGOSO, SHERLY C. 27/28 contributions toward Team Player Award
soldarity
 Expresses one's
spiritual beliefs while Batang Magalang
7 HANDOG, JAMES T. 22/28 respecting the Award
spiritual beliefs of
others

Sensitive to Batang Magalang

8 POE, RICARDO Q. 21/28 individual, social and Award
cultural differences

Sensitive to Batang Magalang

9 TARUC, LUISITO T. 21/28 individual, social and Award
cultural differences
Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016
2. Conduct Awards for grades 4 to 12 in each class will be given at the end of the school year. This will be
based on the evaluation of the adviser and subject teachers, using the guidelines stipulated in Section VI
of DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015.
2. Awardees must have consistently and dutifully carried out the core values of the Department as
indicated in the report card.
3. They must have obtained a rating of at least 75% “Always Observed” (AO) at the end of the school year
(with at least 21 out of 28 AO rating in the report card).
4. They also must have not been sanctioned with offenses punishable by suspension or higher sanction
within the school year according to the Department’s service manual and child protection policies.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

____________________ ____________________
Adviser Principal I

____________________
Teacher Approved:

____________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
A. CLASSROOM AWARD

3. ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE AWARD (QUARTERLY)

Table 1: Academic Excellence Award

AWARDS BY QUARTER

Third Grading
First Grading

Grading

Grading
Awards

Awards

Awards

Awards
Second
No. Names of Pupils/Students

Fourth
Male

With High With Highest With High

1 Male Student 1 96 98 97 96 With High Honors
Honors Honors Honors

2 Male Student 2 85 90 With Honors 87 84

With High
3 Male Student 3 92 With Honors 96 94 With Honors 92 With Honors
Honors

With Highest With Highest With High

4 Male Student 4 98 98 97 97 With High Honors
Honor Honor Honors

5 Male Student 5 74 79 80 83
 Female

With High With High With Highest

1 Female Student 1 95 96 94 With Honors 99
Honors Honors Honor

2 Female Student 2 82 83 87 89

3 Female Student 3 90 With Honors 93 With Honors 90 With Honors 91 With Honors

With High
4 Female Student 4 91 With Honors 93 With Honors 97 96 With High Honors
Honors
 With Highest With Highest With Highest With Highest
5 Female Student 5 98 98 98 99
Honor Honor Honor Honor
Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016
2. The Award for Academic Excellence within the quarter is given to learners from grades 1 to 12 who have attained an average of at least 90 and passed all
learning areas.
2. Awardees must have consistently and dutifully carried out the core values of the Department as indicated in the report card.
3. The Average Grade per Quarter is reported as a whole number following DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC):

_____________________________ _____________________________ _____________________________

Adviser Teacher Guidance Counselor

Recommending Approval: Approved:

_____________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Principal I OIC, Schools Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

1. ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE AWARD (END OF SCHOOL YEAR)

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 2: List of Candidates for the Academic Excellence Award

AWARDS BY QUARTER
No. Names of Learners Second AVERAGE Academic Honors Award
First Grading Third Grading Fourth Grading
Grading

93 92 91 94 93 With Highest Honors/May Pinakamataas na

1 Castillo, Jeneth Joy Karangalan
92 91 91 69 With Highest Honors/May Pinakamataas na
2 Corvera, Coleen Karangalan
90 90 93 68
3 Cempron, Michael Jhon With High Honors/May Mataas na Karangalan
90 23
4 Baluran, Ailyn Mae With High Honors/May Mataas na Karangalan
5 Canoy, Queency Marie 91 93 46 With Honors/ May Karangalan
6 Cultura, Carlyn Ann 91 23 With Honors/ May Karangalan
7 Capunong, Reymark 90 23 With Honors/ May Karangalan
Chato, Psy 90 23
Dagani, Junlloyd 90 93 46
Dail, Gain Dianne 90 23
Dequit, Lian Alyza 90 23
Dupa, Christian Ray 90 94 46
Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016 Legend: 98-100 With Highest Honors/May Pinakamataas na Karangalan
95-97 With High Honors/May Mataas na Karangalan
90-94 With Honors/ May Karangalan
Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC):

_______________________ _______________________ _______________________

Adviser Teacher Guidance Counselor

Recommending Approval: Approved:

_______________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Principal I OIC, School Division Superintendent
 B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

1. ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE AWARD (END OF SCHOOL YEAR)

Table 1: Academic Performance of Pupils/Students (in alphabetical order by gender)

Final Ratings
No. Names of Learners General Average
First Grading Second Grading Third Grading Fourth Grading
Male
1 Male Learner 1 96 98 97 96 97
2 Male Learnert 2 85 90 87 84 87
3 Male Learner 3 92 96 94 92 94
4 Male Learner 4 98 98 97 97 98
5 Male Learner 5 74 79 80 83 79
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
 0
0
0
0
0
0
Female
1 Female Learner 1 95 96 94 99 96
2 Female Learner 2 82 83 87 89 85
3 Female Learner 3 90 93 90 91 91
4 Female Learner 4 91 93 97 96 94
5 Female Learner 5 98 98 98 99 98
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
 0
0

Prerequisite Forms for Checking: SF No. 1, 2, 3

(Hard and Soft Copies) e-Class Record
Form 138
Form 137
SF No. 5

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC):

__________________________ __________________________ __________________________

Adviser Teacher Guidance Counselor

Recommending Approval:

__________________________
Principal I
Approved:

LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

OIC, School Division Superintendent
A. CLASSROOM AWARD

4. RECOGNITION FOR PERFECT ATTENDANCE

Table 1: List of Candidates for the Recognition for Perfect Attendance

NO. NAMES OF AWARDEES AWARDS QUARTERS

Perfect Attendance Award First Quarter

1 Learner 1
Perfect Attendance Award Third Quarter
Perfect Attendance Award First Quarter
Perfect Attendance Award Second Quarter
2 Learner 2
Perfect Attendance Award Third Quarter
Perfect Attendance Award Fourth Quarter
3 Learner 3 Perfect Attendance Award Second Quarter
Perfect Attendance Award First Quarter
4 Learner 4 Perfect Attendance Award Second Quarter
Perfect Attendance Award Fourth Quarter
5 Learner 5 Perfect Attendance Award Third Quarter
6 Learner 6 Perfect Attendance Award First Quarter
Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016
2. This award is given at the end of every quarter to encourage learners to attend and actively participate in class.
3. Perfect attendance means that a learner must be present in all of his/her classes, and must have no absences for the entire quarter.
4. Learners who are representing the school for various purposes (e.g., in-school or offcampus activities) may also qualify for this award.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC):

_______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________

Adviser Teacher Guidance Counselor
Recommending Approval:

_______________________________
Principal I
Approved:

LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

OIC, School Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

2. LEADERSHIP AWARD

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 1. Leadership Awardees for Grades 6, 10 and 12

1 Has no failing grades in any of the learning areas YES NO

Has not committed any offense punishable by suspension or higher sanction according to the Department’s service
2 YES NO
manual and child protection policies in the current school year.?
3 Is a class officer or an active member/officer of any recognized school club, team, or organization? YES NO

Advisers/Subj
Names of ect Teachers Peer Evaluations
Pupils/Studen CRITERIA FOR LEADERSHIP AWARD Evaluations AVERAGE AVERAGE
ts
T 1 T2 T3 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
TOTAL
Motivational Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; 24 23 24 23.67 16 15 16 14 16 15 16 15 16 14 16 16 15.42 39.08
Peers-16%
Planning and Organizational Skills (40%) 23 22 23 22.67 12 13 14 15 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 16 13.75 36.42
FONTELO, Advisers-24%; Peers-16%
RUBY Y.
Contribution to the School and/or 10 10 9 9.67 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7.83 17.50
Community (20%) Advisers-12%; Peers-8%
57 55 56 56.00 36 36 37 37 36 36 36 36 37 37 40 40 37.00 93.00
Motivational Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; 21 22 22 21.67 16 15 16 14 16 15 16 15 16 14 16 16 15.42 37.08
Peers-16%
Planning and Organizational Skills (40%) 22 21 24 22.33 12 13 14 15 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 16 13.75 36.08
HANDAYAN, Advisers-24%; Peers-16%
JAKE D.
HANDAYAN,
JAKE D.
Contribution to the School and/or 9 9 8 8.67 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7.83 16.50
Community (20%) Advisers-12%; Peers-8%
52 52 54 52.67 36 36 37 37 36 36 36 36 37 37 40 40 37.00 89.67
Motivational Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; 24 23 24 23.67 16 15 16 14 16 15 16 15 16 14 16 16 15.42 39.08
Peers-16%
Planning and Organizational Skills (40%)
FONTELO, 23 22 23 22.67 12 13 14 15 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 16 13.75 36.42
Advisers-24%;
Contribution toPeers-16%
the School and/or
RUBY Y. 10 10 9 9.67 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7.83 17.50
Community (20%) Advisers-12%; Peers-8%
57 55 56 56.00 36 36 37 37 36 36 36 36 37 37 40 40 37.00 93.00
Motivational Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; 24 23 24 23.67 16 15 16 14 16 15 16 15 16 14 16 16 15.42 39.08
Peers-16%
Planning and Organizational Skills (40%)
FONTELO, 23 22 23 22.67 12 13 14 15 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 16 13.75 36.42
Advisers-24%;toPeers-16%
Contribution the School and/or
RUBY Y. 10 10 9 9.67 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7.83 17.50
Community (20%) Advisers-12%; Peers-8%
57 55 56 56.00 36 36 37 37 36 36 36 36 37 37 40 40 37.00 93.00
Motivational Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; 24 23 24 23.67 16 15 16 14 16 15 16 15 16 14 16 16 15.42 39.08
Peers-16%
Planning and Organizational Skills (40%)
FONTELO, 23 22 23 22.67 12 13 14 15 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 16 13.75 36.42
Advisers-24%;
Contribution toPeers-16%
the School and/or
RUBY Y. 10 10 9 9.67 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7.83 17.50
Community (20%) Advisers-12%; Peers-8%
57 55 56 56.00 36 36 37 37 36 36 36 36 37 37 40 40 37.00 93.00
Motivational Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; 24 23 24 23.67 16 15 16 14 16 15 16 15 16 14 16 16 15.42 39.08
Peers-16%
Planning and Organizational Skills (40%)
FONTELO, 23 22 23 22.67 12 13 14 15 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 16 13.75 36.42
Advisers-24%;
Contribution toPeers-16%
the School and/or
RUBY Y. 10 10 9 9.67 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7.83 17.50
Community (20%) Advisers-12%; Peers-8%
57 55 56 56.00 36 36 37 37 36 36 36 36 37 37 40 40 37.00 93.00
Motivational Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; 24 23 24 23.67 16 15 16 14 16 15 16 15 16 14 16 16 15.42 39.08
Peers-16%
Planning and Organizational Skills (40%)
FONTELO, 23 22 23 22.67 12 13 14 15 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 16 13.75 36.42
Advisers-24%;
Contribution toPeers-16%
the School and/or
RUBY Y. 10 10 9 9.67 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7.83 17.50
Community (20%) Advisers-12%; Peers-8%
57 55 56 56.00 36 36 37 37 36 36 36 36 37 37 40 40 37.00 93.00
Motivational Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; 24 23 24 23.67 16 15 16 14 16 15 16 15 16 14 16 16 15.42 39.08
Peers-16%
Planning and Organizational Skills (40%)
FONTELO, 23 22 23 22.67 12 13 14 15 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 16 13.75 36.42
Advisers-24%;toPeers-16%
Contribution the School and/or
RUBY Y. 10 10 9 9.67 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7.83 17.50
Community (20%) Advisers-12%; Peers-8%
57 55 56 56.00 36 36 37 37 36 36 36 36 37 37 40 40 37.00 93.00
Motivational Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; 24 23 24 23.67 16 15 16 14 16 15 16 15 16 14 16 16 15.42 39.08
Peers-16%
Planning and Organizational Skills (40%)
FONTELO, 23 22 23 22.67 12 13 14 15 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 16 13.75 36.42
Advisers-24%;
Contribution toPeers-16%
the School and/or
RUBY Y. 10 10 9 9.67 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7.83 17.50
Community (20%) Advisers-12%; Peers-8%
57 55 56 56.00 36 36 37 37 36 36 36 36 37 37 40 40 37.00 93.00
Motivational Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; 24 23 24 23.67 16 15 16 14 16 15 16 15 16 14 16 16 15.42 39.08
Peers-16%
Planning and Organizational Skills (40%)
FONTELO, 23 22 23 22.67 12 13 14 15 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 16 13.75 36.42
Advisers-24%;
Contribution toPeers-16%
the School and/or
RUBY Y. 10 10 9 9.67 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7.83 17.50
Community (20%) Advisers-12%; Peers-8%
57 55 56 56.00 36 36 37 37 36 36 36 36 37 37 40 40 37.00 93.00
Motivational Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; 24 24 24 24.00 16 15 16 14 16 15 16 15 16 14 16 16 15.42 39.42
Peers-16%
Planning and Organizational Skills (40%)
KATUGAS, 23 23 24 23.33 12 13 14 15 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 16 13.75 37.08
Advisers-24%; Peers-16%
MINA F.
 KATUGAS,
MINA F. Contribution to the School and/or 12 12 12 12.00 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 7.83 19.83
Community (20%) Advisers-12%; Peers-8%
59 59 60 59.33 36 36 37 37 36 36 36 36 37 37 40 40 37.00 96.33
Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC):

_________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________

Adviser Subject Teacher Guidance Counselor

Recommending Approval: Approved:

___________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Principal I OIC, School Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

2. LEADERSHIP AWARD

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 2. Conduct Awardees for Grades 4-12 Consolidation Sheet

Has not committed any
offense punishable by
1 suspension
Has no failingor grades
higher in any of the learning areas?
2 sanction according to the
Department’s service
3 Is a classand
manual officer
childorprotection
an active member/officer of any recognized school club, team, or organization?
policies in the current
school year.?

CRITERIA FOR LEADERSHIP AWARD

Names of Pupils/
Planning and Organizational Contribution to the School TOTAL
Students Motivational Skills (40%) Skills (40%) Advisers-24%; and/or Community (20%)
Advisers-24%; Peers-16% Peers-16% Advisers-12%; Peers-8%

KATUGAS, MINA F. 39.417 37.083 19.833 96

FONTELO, RUBY Y. 39.080 36.420 17.500 93
HANDAYAN, JAKE D. 37.083 36.083 16.500 90
0
0
0
0
 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

______________________________ ______________________________
Adviser Principal I

______________________________
 Teacher Approved:

______________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

3. AWARD FOR OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE IN SPECIFIC DISCIPLINES

3.1. ATHLETICS

School: Dagundong Elementary School

Grade Level: Grade 6
Section: Gabriela
Teacher: Mrs. Rosario Manhilot
Award: Athlete of the Year
Learning Area: Physical Education

Table 1.Criteria for awards for outstanding performance in ATHLETICS

Advisers/Subject Teachers Evaluations (Total of 10 Teachers)

Names of CRITERIA FOR AWARDS FOR

Pupils/ OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE IN
Students ATHLETICS POINTS (100 points PERCENTAGE POINTS
each category)

Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 98 20% 19.60
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if 100 5% 5.00
Skill in the Discipline - 40% applicable)
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
AWIT, RUSTOM d. Winnings and awards ) 100 20% 20.00
D.
Teachers 100 10% 10.00
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20%
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser )
AWIT, RUSTOM
D.
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20%
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00

Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)

100% 98.600
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 98 20% 19.60
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if
Skill in the Discipline - 40% 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
AWIT, RUSTOM
D. d. Winnings and awards ) 100 20% 20.00

Attitude toward the Discipline - 20% Teachers 100 10% 10.00

(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00
Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
200% 98.600
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 98 20% 19.60
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if
Skill in the Discipline - 40% 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
AWIT, RUSTOM d. Winnings and awards ) 100 20% 20.00
D.
Teachers 100 10% 10.00
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20%
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00

Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
 300% 98.600
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 98 20% 19.60
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if
Skill in the Discipline - 40% 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
AWIT, RUSTOM
D. d. Winnings and awards ) 100 20% 20.00
Teachers 100 10% 10.00
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20%
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00

Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
400% 98.600
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 98 20% 19.60
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if
Skill in the Discipline - 40% 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
AWIT, RUSTOM d. Winnings and awards ) 100 20% 20.00
D.
Teachers 100 10% 10.00
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20%
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00

Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
500% 98.600
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 98 20% 19.60
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
 Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if
Skill in the Discipline - 40% applicable) 100 5% 5.00

Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00

AWIT, RUSTOM d. Winnings and awards ) 100 20% 20.00
D.
Teachers 100 10% 10.00
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20%
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00

Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
600% 98.600
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 98 20% 19.60
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects,
etc., if applicable) 90 10% 9.00

Membership in a club/team (if

Skill in the Discipline - 40% 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
AWIT, RUSTOM
D. d. Winnings and awards ) 100 20% 20.00
Teachers 100 10% 10.00
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20%
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00
Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
700% 98.600
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 95 20% 19.00
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)

Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00

etc., if applicable)

Membership in a club/team (if

Skill in the Discipline - 40% 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00

BATULAN, REX
N.
 Skill in the Discipline - 40%

BATULAN, REX Winnings and awards 80 20% 16.00

N. Teachers 100 10% 10.00
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20%
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00

Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)

3500% 94.000
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 95 20% 19.00
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Skill in the Discipline - 40%
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
BATULAN, REX Winnings and awards 80 20% 16.00
N.
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20% Teachers 100 10% 10.00
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00
Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
6900% 94.000
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 95 20% 19.00
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Skill in the Discipline - 40%
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
BATULAN, REX
N. Winnings and awards 80 20% 16.00

Attitude toward the Discipline - 20% Teachers 100 10% 10.00

(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00
 N.

Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
13600% 94.000
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 95 20% 19.00
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Skill in the Discipline - 40%
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
BATULAN, REX Winnings and awards 80 20% 16.00
N.
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20% Teachers 100 10% 10.00
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00
Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
26900% 94.000
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 95 20% 19.00
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Skill in the Discipline - 40%
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
BATULAN, REX Winnings and awards 80 20% 16.00
N.
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20% Teachers 100 10% 10.00
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00
Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
53400% 94.000
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 95 20% 19.00
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Skill in the Discipline - 40%

BATULAN, REX
N.
 Skill in the Discipline - 40%
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
BATULAN, REX Winnings and awards 80 20% 16.00
N.
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20% Teachers 100 10% 10.00
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00
Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
106300% 94.000
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 95 20% 19.00
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Skill in the Discipline - 40%
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
BATULAN, REX Winnings and awards 80 20% 16.00
N.
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20% Teachers 100 10% 10.00
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 100 10% 10.00
Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 100 20% 20.00
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)
212000% 94.000

Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 90 20% 18.00
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)
Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00
etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if 100 5% 5.00
Skill in the Discipline - 40% applicable)
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
CACULBA, Winnings and awards 80 20% 16.00
BRYAN M.
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20% Teachers 80 10% 8.00
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 80 10% 8.00
 BRYAN M.

Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 98 20% 19.60
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)

423300% 88.600

Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in the learning area or average of the final 90 20% 18.00
grades in subjects specifically related to the award)

Output (oral or written work, projects, 90 10% 9.00

etc., if applicable)
Membership in a club/team (if
Skill in the Discipline - 40% 100 5% 5.00
applicable)
Class or school representation 100 5% 5.00
DUGAYON, Winnings and awards 80 20% 16.00
MELCHOR
Teachers 90 10% 9.00
Attitude toward the Discipline - 20%
(a. Peer evaluation (if applicable) b.
Commendation from coach/adviser ) Peers 80 10% 8.00

Contribution to the School related to the Discipline - 20% (In any of the
following: a. Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance in school’s various functions 98 20% 19.60
and events c. Products d. Projects e. Volunteer work)

423400% 89.600

For winning, participation and awards:

WINS POINTS PARTICIPATION POINTS
National Awards 100 National Participation 100
Regional awards 80 Regional Participation 80
Division Awards 60 Division Participation 60
School Awards 50 School Participation 50

Note:

1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016

2. Given to recognized learners in Grades 6, 10, and 12 who have exhibited exemplary skills and achievement in specific disciplines - Athletics, Arts (e.g, visual, media, music, or performing
arts), Communication Arts, Mathematics, Science, Social Sciences, and Technical-Vocational Education (Tech-Voc).

3. The academic rating that will be considered for this reward would be the student's final rating in the respective subjects: Athlete of the Year (Physical Education), Arts (Music, Arts, or
Contemporary Philippine Arts from the Regions for SHS), Communication Arts (Filipino, English or other foreign language subjects and related learning areas in SHS specific to the work),
Science (Science for Grades 6 and 10 or average rating for the two core Science subjects in SHS), Mathematics (Mathematics for Grades 6 and 10 or the average rating for the core
Mathematics subjects in SHS), Social Sciences (Araling Panlipunan for the Grades 6 and 10, or the average rating for the core Social Science subjects Personal Development/ Pansariling
Kaunlaran and Understanding Culture, Society, and Politics), and Technical-Vocational Education (TLE for Grades 6 and 10, or the average rating for the specialized areas.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

__________________________________ __________________________________

Adviser Principal I

__________________________________

Teacher Approved:

__________________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC):

JULIUS PHILLIP Q. CAESAR RODNEY S. MANLANGIT

Adviser Guidance Counselor

Recommending Approval:

LEONARDO D. VINCISLAO
Principal I

LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

OIC, School Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

3. AWARD FOR OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE IN SPECIFIC DISCIPLINES

3.1. ATHLETICS

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 2. Outstanding Performance Awardees for Grades 4-12 Consolidation Sheet

Has not committed any
offense punishable by
1 suspension
Has no failingor grades
higher in any of the learning areas?
2 sanction according to the
Department’s service
3 Is a classand
manual officer
childorprotection
an active member/officer of any recognized school club, team, or organization?
policies in the current
school year.?

CRITERIA FOR OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE IN ATHLETICS

Skills in the Discipline

Contribution to the School related
Names of Pupils/
Academic Rating - 20% (Final grade in Attitude toward the Discipline - to the Discipline - 20% (In any of TOTAL
Students the learning area or average of the final 20% (a. Peer evaluation (if the following: a.
grades in subjects specifically related to Output (oral or Membership applicable) b. Commendation Tutorials/Coaching b. Performance
written work, in a club/team Class or school Winnings and in school’s various functions and
the award) from coach/adviser )
projects, etc., (if applicable) representation awards ) events c. Products d. Projects e.
if applicable) Volunteer work)

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

BATULAN, REX N. 19.000 9.000 5.000 5.000 16.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 94
DUGAYON, MELCHOR
T. 18.000 9.000 5.000 5.000 16.000 9.000 8.000 19.600 90

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95
AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95
 AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

AWIT, RUSTOM D. 15.600 9.000 5.000 5.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 20.000 95

Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016

2. Given to recognized learners in Grades 6, 10, and 12 who have exhibited exemplary skills and achievement in specific disciplines - Athletics, Arts (e.g, visual,
media, music, or performing arts), Communication Arts, Mathematics, Science, Social Sciences, and Technical-Vocational Education (Tech-Voc).

3. The academic rating that will be considered for this reward would be the student's final rating in the respective subjects: Athlete of the Year (Physical
Education), Arts (Music, Arts, or Contemporary Philippine Arts from the Regions for SHS), Communication Arts (Filipino, English or other foreign language
subjects and related learning areas in SHS specific to the work), Science (Science for Grades 6 and 10 or average rating for the two core Science subjects in SHS),
Mathematics (Mathematics for Grades 6 and 10 or the average rating for the core Mathematics subjects in SHS), Social Sciences (Araling Panlipunan for the
Grades 6 and 10, or the average rating for the core Social Science subjects Personal Development/ Pansariling Kaunlaran and Understanding Culture, Society,
and Politics), and Technical-Vocational Education (TLE for Grades 6 and 10, or the average rating for the specialized areas.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

__________________________________ __________________________________
Adviser Principal I

__________________________________
Teacher Approved:

__________________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

4. AWARD FOR WORK IMMERSION

School:
Grade Level: Grade 12
Section:
Teacher:

Table 1. List of Work Immersion Awardees

No. Names of Grade 12 Students Work Immersion Awards

Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016
2. Award for Work Immersion is specific to Senior High School (SHS) tracks.

3. This award may be given to grade 12 graduating students who have exemplified outstanding
performance based on the terms of reference or engagement set by the school and evaluation of the
direct supervisor and subject teacher.

4. The awardee(s) must have received high efficiency rating for their diligence and consistency in
performing their duties and responsibilities throughout the immersion program.
5. Only those learners who have received an outstanding academic rating in the Work Immersion subject
(at least 90%) shall be awarded. This rating in the report card consists of the learner’s performance and/or
output during the Work Immersion.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

__________________________________ __________________________________
Adviser Principal I

__________________________________
Teacher Approved:

__________________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

5. AWARD FOR RESEARCH OR INNOVATION

School:
Grade Level: Grade 12
Section:
Teacher:

Table 1. Research criteria and weights

Names of
Grade 12 Criteria Weight Rate
Students
Research Grade 20% 15
Output
Usefulness/ Significance of Research 35% 32
Roel Go
Rigor 30% 27
Research Presentation 15% 15
TOTAL 89
Research Grade 20% 15
Output
Usefulness/ Significance of Research 35% 32
Roel Go
Rigor 30% 27
Research Presentation 15% 15
TOTAL 89
Research Grade 20% 15
Output
Usefulness/ Significance of Research 35% 32
Roel Go
Rigor 30% 27
Research Presentation 15% 15
TOTAL 89
Research Grade 20% 15
Output
Usefulness/ Significance of Research 35% 32
Roel Go
Rigor 30% 27
Research Presentation 15% 15
TOTAL 89
Research Grade 20% 15
Output
Usefulness/ Significance of Research 35% 32
Roel Go
Rigor 30% 27
Research Presentation 15% 15
TOTAL 89
Research Grade 20% 15
Output
Usefulness/ Significance of Research 35% 32
Roel Go
Rigor 30% 27
Research Presentation 15% 15
 Roel Go

TOTAL 89
Research Grade 20% 20
Output
Randy Usefulness/Significance of Research 35% 33
Obligar Rigor 30% 29
Research Presentation 15% 14
TOTAL 96
Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016
2. Recipients of this award are only those Grade 12 learners, pairs, or group of not more
than 4 members who have led the planning and execution of a research or innovation to
advance the potential applications of technology, or research whose findings can be used
to drive better efficiency and productivity as well as to improve the lives of the people in
the school and/or community.

3. Only those learners who have received at least 90% of the criteria above shall be
awarded.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

______________________________________ ______________________________________
Adviser Principal I

______________________________________
Teacher Approved:

______________________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

5. AWARD FOR RESEARCH OR INNOVATION

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 2. Research Awardees for Grade 12 - Consolidation Sheet

CRITERIA FOR RESEARCH AWARD

Output
Names of Pupils/ TOTAL
Students Research Research
Grade Usefulness/ Presentation
Significance of Rigor
Research

Randy Obligar Rate 0.00 32.00 27.00 59.00

Randy Obligar 15.00 32.00 27.00 15.00 89.00
Randy Obligar 0.00 27.00 15.00 89.00 131.00
Randy Obligar 32.00 15.00 89.00 20.00 156.00
Randy Obligar 27.00 89.00 20.00 0.00 136.00
Randy Obligar 15.00 32.00 27.00 15.00 89.00
Randy Obligar 0.00 27.00 15.00 89.00 131.00
Randy Obligar 32.00 15.00 89.00 20.00 156.00
Randy Obligar 27.00 89.00 20.00 0.00 136.00
Randy Obligar 15.00 20.00 0.00 33.00 68.00
Randy Obligar 89.00 0.00 33.00 29.00 151.00
Randy Obligar 20.00 33.00 29.00 14.00 96.00

Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016

2. Recipients of this award are only those Grade 12 learners, pairs, or

group of not more than 4 members who have led the planning and
execution of a research or innovation to advance the potential
applications of technology, or research whose findings can be used to
drive better efficiency and productivity as well as to improve the lives of
the people in the school and/or community.

3. Only those learners who have received at least 90% of the criteria
above shall be awarded.
Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

_________________________ _________________________
Adviser Principal I

_________________________
Teacher Approved:

_________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

5. AWARD FOR RESEARCH OR INNOVATION

School:
Grade Level: Grade 12
Section:
Teacher:

Table 2. Innovation criteria and weights

Names of
Grade 12 Criteria Weight Rate
Students
Output
a. Originality or novelty of the product or 15% 15
service

b. Relevance, applicability, replicability,

sustainability and/or usefulness to the school 25% 23
and/or larger community

c. Cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and/or 20% 19

practicality
Nanette d. Environmentally safe 10% 10
Tuquib Delivery of Pfesentation
a. Clarity of the product development
process and the innovative features shown 10% 9
during presentation
b. Acceptability of the innovation to the 5% 5
target beneficiaries
Study or Research
a. Research basis of the service or 15% 15
product
TOTAL 96
Output
a. Originality or novelty of the product or 15% 15
service

b. Relevance, applicability, replicability,

sustainability and/or usefulness to the school 25% 23
and/or larger community

c. Cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and/or 20% 19

practicality
Nanette d. Environmentally safe 10% 10
Tuquib Delivery of Pfesentation
a. Clarity of the product development
process and the innovative features shown 10% 9
during presentation
Tuquib

b. Acceptability of the innovation to the 5% 5

target beneficiaries
Study or Research
a. Research basis of the service or 15% 15
product
TOTAL 96
Output
a. Originality or novelty of the product or 15% 15
service

b. Relevance, applicability, replicability,

sustainability and/or usefulness to the school 25% 23
and/or larger community

c. Cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and/or 20% 19

practicality
Nanette d. Environmentally safe 10% 10
Tuquib Delivery of Pfesentation
a. Clarity of the product development
process and the innovative features shown 10% 9
during presentation
b. Acceptability of the innovation to the 5% 5
target beneficiaries
Study or Research
a. Research basis of the service or 15% 15
product
TOTAL 96
Output
a. Originality or novelty of the product or 15% 15
service

b. Relevance, applicability, replicability,

sustainability and/or usefulness to the school 25% 23
and/or larger community

c. Cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and/or 20% 19

practicality
Nanette d. Environmentally safe 10% 10
Tuquib Delivery of Pfesentation
a. Clarity of the product development
process and the innovative features shown 10% 9
during presentation
b. Acceptability of the innovation to the 5% 5
target beneficiaries
Study or Research
a. Research basis of the service or 15% 15
product
TOTAL 96
Output
 a. Originality or novelty of the product or 15% 15
service

b. Relevance, applicability, replicability,

sustainability and/or usefulness to the school 25% 23
and/or larger community

c. Cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and/or 20% 19

practicality
Nanette d. Environmentally safe 10% 10
Tuquib Delivery of Pfesentation
a. Clarity of the product development
process and the innovative features shown 10% 9
during presentation
b. Acceptability of the innovation to the 5% 5
target beneficiaries
Study or Research
a. Research basis of the service or 15% 15
product
TOTAL 96
Output
a. Originality or novelty of the product or 15% 13
service

b. Relevance, applicability, replicability,

sustainability and/or usefulness to the school 25% 23
and/or larger community

c. Cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and/or 20% 18

practicality
d. Environmentally safe 10% 9
Delivery of Pfesentation
Melchor
Babeda a. Clarity of the product development
process and the innovative features shown 10% 7
during presentation
b. Acceptability of the innovation to the 5% 5
target beneficiaries
Study or Research

a. Research basis of the service or 15% 14

product

TOTAL 89
Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016
 2. Recipients of this award are only those Grade 12 learners, pairs, or group of not more
than 4 members who have led the planning and execution of a research or innovation to
advance the potential applications of technology, or research whose findings can be used
to drive better efficiency and productivity as well as to improve the lives of the people in
the school and/or community.

3. Only those learners who have received at least 90% of the criteria above shall be
awarded.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

__________________________________ __________________________________
Adviser Principal I

__________________________________
Teacher Approved:

__________________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

5. AWARD FOR RESEARCH OR INNOVATION

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 2. Innovation Awardees for Grades 12 - Consolidation Sheet

Output Delivery of Pfesentation Study or Research

Names of Grade a. Clarity of the

12 Innovation b. Relevance, product development TOTAL
Awardees a. Originality or applicability, replicability, c. Cost-effectiveness, b. Acceptability of the
d. Environmentally process and the innovation to the target thea.service
Research basis of
novelty of the product or sustainability and/or efficiency, and/or safe innovative features or product
service usefulness to the school practicality beneficiaries
shown during
and/or larger community presentation

Nanette
Tuquib 15 23 19 10 9 5 15 96.00
Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

______________________________ ______________________________
Adviser Principal I

______________________________
Teacher Approved:

______________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

5. AWARD FOR CLUB OR ORGANIZATION ACHIEVEMENT

School:
Grade Level: Grade 12
Section:
Teacher:

Table 2. Innovation criteria and weights

Names of
Grade 12 Criteria Weight Rate
Students
Club/ Organization Performance 50% 40
Kapisanan ng Exemplary Output 30% 24
Makatang
Pilipino Contribution to the School or Community 20% 19
(KaMaPi)
TOTAL 83
Club/ Organization Performance 50% 45
Exemplary Output 30% 27
English Club
Contribution to the School or Community 20% 20

TOTAL 92
Club/ Organization Performance 50% 48
Exemplary Output 30% 28
English Club
Contribution to the School or Community 20% 19

95
Club/ Organization Performance 50% 48
Exemplary Output 30% 28
Tud-um
Contribution to the School or Community 20% 19

TOTAL 95
Club/ Organization Performance 50% 48
Exemplary Output 30% 28
English Club
Contribution to the School or Community 20% 19

95
Club/ Organization Performance 50% 48
Exemplary Output 30% 28
Tud-um
Contribution to the School or Community 20% 19

TOTAL 95

Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016
2. Given only to a duly recognized club or organization that has created positive impacts on the school
and/or community it serves through the implementation of all its planned projects and activities,
provided strong support to the implementation of the school activities and attainment of the school's
objectives, and taken great strides to help its members develop their potentials.
3. Only those clubs or organizations that have received at least 90% of the criteria above.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

________________________________ ________________________________
Adviser Principal I

________________________________
Teacher Approved:

________________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
B. GRADE-LEVEL AWARDS

5. AWARD FOR CLUB OR ORGANIZATION ACHIEVEMENT

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 2. Research Awardees for Grade 12 - Consolidation Sheet

CRITERIA FOR RESEARCH AWARD

Names of
Pupils/ TOTAL
Students Club/ Organization Contribution to the School or
Exemplary Output
Performance Community

Tud-um 48.00 28.00 19.00 95.00

English Club 45.00 27.00 20.00 92.00

0.00

0.00

0.00
 0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00
0.00
Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016
2. Given only to a duly recognized club or organization that has created positive impacts on the school and/or community it serves
through the implementation of all its planned projects and activities, provided strong support to the implementation of the school
activities and attainment of the school's objectives, and taken great strides to help its members develop their potentials.
3. Only those clubs or organizations that have received at least 90% of the criteria above.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

__________________________________ __________________________________
Adviser Principal I

__________________________________
Teacher Approved:

__________________________________ LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent
C. SPECIAL RECOGNITION

School:
Grade Level:
Section:
Teacher:

Table 1. List of Special Recognition Awardees

No. Names of Awardees Special Recognitions

Note:
1. Based on DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2016
2. Learners who have represented and/or won in competitions at the district, division, regional, national,
or international levels will be recognized.
3. These awardees have demonstrated their exemplary performance in academics, athletics, and the
arts, and/or represented the school in DepEd-recognized activities.

Prepared by the Awards Committee (AC): Recommending Approval:

____________________________________
Adviser Principal I

Teacher Approved:

LORENZO O. MACASOCOL, Ph.D., CESE

Guidance Counselor OIC, School Division Superintendent