International Journal of Hydropower and Dams. Vol. 4, No. 2, Pp. 126-138

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Ghrib, F., Léger, P., Tinawi, R., Lupien, R., Veilleux, M. (1997) Seismic safety evaluation of gravity dams.

International Journal of Hydropower and Dams. Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 126-138.


Hall, J.F. 1988. The dynamic and earthquake behaviour of concrete dams: review of experimental
behaviour and observational evidence. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 2,
pp. 58-117.
International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD). (1986) Earthquake analysis for dams, ICOLD Bulletin
52, Paris.
Kreuzer, H. (2000) The use of risk analysis to support dam Safety decisions and Management.
Proceedings ICOLD 20th Congress Beijing, China, Gr. Q.76, p.769-834.
McCann, M. W., Franzini, J. B., Kavazanjian, E. and Shah, H. C. (1985) Preliminary safety evaluation of
existang dams, Volume I, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Depertment of Civil
Engineering, Stanford University, Report No. 69.
Melchers, R. E. (1999) Structural reliability analysis and prediction, Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers) (2000) Evaluation and comparison of stability analysis and uplift
criteria for concrete gravity dams by three federal agencies. Engineering Research and Development
Center – Information Technology Laboratory. Report ERDC/ITL TR-00-1, Washington, D.C.
(document from the web: http://www.wes.army.mil/ITL/itlpubl.html)
USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers) (1995) Engineering and design: Gravity dam design. Report EM
1110-2-2000, Washington, D.C.
USBR (United States Bureau of Reclamation) (1987) Design of small dams. Denver, Colorado.
1
CADAM USER'S INTERFACE

· File management, modelling analysis options;


· Graphical display, output results, link with spreadsheets.

2
DAM MODEL

· Geometry, added masses, material properties, lift joints.

3
STATIC LOADING CONDITIONS

4 5 6
BASIC CONDITIONS UPLIFT PRESSURES FLOOD

· Reservoir elevation; · Dam safety guidelines; · Floating debris;


· Ice, silt; · Drainage efficiency. · Overtopping.
· Post-tensioning;
· User defined forces.

SEISMIC
NO
LOADS?

YES

7
SEISMIC LOADING CONDITIONS

8 9
PSEUDO-STATIC PSEUDO-DYNAMIC

· Analysis input data. · Analysis input data.

10
CRACKING OPTIONS

· Initiation / propagation criteria;


· Effect of cracking on uplift pressures
(static, flood, seismic, post-seismic).

11
LOAD COMBINATIONS
(Static, Flood, Seismic & Post-seismic)
13
OUTPUTS
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
12
LOOP · Printed reports;
(Static, Flood, Seismic & Post-seismic)
· Graphical display;
· ASCII files.

PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS
14 15
INCREMENTAL LOAD ANALYSIS
(Monte-Carlo simulations)
· Static, flood, seismic.
· Definition of a probability density function;
· static, flood, seismic.

Figure 1. CADAM overall organization.

You might also like