Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Culture of Ban
Culture of Ban
www.visionias.in
Culture of Ban
Table of Content
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 2
2. Pros and cons of banning ....................................................................................................................................... 2
3. Problems with banning ........................................................................................................................................... 2
4. Recent incidents of banning in India ...................................................................................................................... 3
5. Beef ban in Maharashtra ........................................................................................................................................ 4
5.1. Arguments in Favor of the Ban ........................................................................................................................ 4
5.2. Arguments against the Ban ............................................................................................................................. 4
6. Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................................. 4
In recent times, banning has become a solution to end all the problems or issues faced by people of a certain
group, instead of putting things to debate, bans are imposed. Ideas labelled as erotic, or threatening ethnicity, or
even public purpose get banned easily. Any comment or imagined insult to a caste group leads to violence or
ostracism.
Banning culture of India is not a recent phenomenon eg. Salman Rushdie’s Satanic verses was banned in the year
1988 due to protest by Islamic fundamentalists. Recently, there has a tendency to ban more and more. But
banning has not resulted in the resolution of controversies; rather it has led to closing of minds. Also, banning
leads to deviance from debate as an effective way to resolve conflicts.
This ‘culture of banning’ is odd for a society like India which boasts of diversities in language, religion, and
politics. The culture of banning goes against ‘tolerance’ which has been seen as synonymous with the Indian
society at several points in history.
)
m
19(2) of the Constitution enables the legislature to impose certain restrictions on freedom of speech and
co
expression due to the following reasons:
l.
ai
gm
security of the State,
friendly relations with foreign States, @
53
public order,
63
gh
contempt of court,
ps
(s
defamation,
sh
Bans are mostly imposed under the above mentioned provisions. Banning in itself is not wrong, but banning in
rS
Recently in India, banning has been taken either in haste, or under populist pressure, without adequate debate
is
al
of the matter. Many argue that most bans are India is due to vague reasons (example ban of 857 porn sites by
on
rs
the government). Also, banning can have a multi-dimensional impact, which is not adequately studied. (Example
pe
the beef ban in Maharashtra has affected the Dalits and Muslims economically, but these are not taken into
s
ti
consideration).
en
m
cu
Further, bans are imposed by citing Article 19(2) but the justification is not valid always. Rather, the article is
do
used in a loose sense to justify the ban. Example ban of the documentary ‘India’s daughter’.
is
Th
Some bans like the ban on child pornography, is justified, but many cannot be justified. Bans are sometimes
necessary, but the reason for imposition of ban and the way in which they are imposed are more important.
)
m
co
earlier this year as it reintroduced the Maharashtra Animal Preservation (Amendment) Bill after 19 years.
l.
ai
Anyone found in possession of beef can be sent to jail for five years or fined Rs 10,000
gm
Ban on cuss words in Bollywood by CBFC @
53
Ban on film Dirty Politics in Bihar by Patna High Court citing reasons of objectionable scenes in the movie.
63
gh
Later the court had to lift the ban as CBFC had already approved the movie
in
ps
Ban on release of documentary India’s daughter in India- Government of India initially argued that the
(s
documentary showed India in poor light and then claimed that the filmmaker had not obtained the required
ash
ak
permissions. Nonetheless, BBC went on to air the documentary. The ban has just added to the curiosity and
Pr
Ban on parties in Karnataka with foreign invitees unless its under police supervision
ha
rS
Wendy Doniger’s book, The Hindus: An Alternative History, was withdrawn from the shelves by her publisher
fo
NGOs: Greenpeace Ministry of Home Affairs froze Green Peace funds and suspended its licence to receive
al
on
foreign funds citing discrepancies in their accounts. They also deplaned one of its activists, Priya Pillai, in a
rs
pe
Maggi- Based on the finding of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), state governments
en
m
across the country have banned Maggi instant noodles, a Nestle India product, after finding that lead and
cu
do
MSG were beyond the permissible limit. But Bombay High court has put a stay on the ban and samples have
is
Ban of 857 porn sites by the government (has been revoked now)
Ban of the book by ex-Pakistan Foreign Secretary
Ban of Ghulam Ali concert in Mumbai
Movie ‘Unfreedom’ was banned in India for its "content" of a "different kind"- it had scenes depicting same
sex love.
)
m
co
State does not have a right to impose a certain food culture in any form on people.
l.
ai
It will hamper the cattle economy. There will be no one who will nurture buffalo, cows or bulls, which are
gm
neither useful for meat nor agricultural purposes.
@
Nothing is done about imported beef. There are many restaurants that use Angus beef from USA and
53
63
Australia.
gh
in
The ban has been imposed, without taking care of the alternative employment of people involved in the beef
ps
industry. Also, the groups most affected by the ban are Dalits and Muslims, which has given the entire issue a
(s
sh
6. Conclusion
s
ha
rS
The ban culture silences dissent, marginality, creativity, and eccentricity. In fact ban becomes a majoritarian
fo
weapon of rectifying history. It often makes little difference whether one is banning history, beef or a battle
ed
is
against development. The openness of democracy is challenged by the closures of majoritarianism and the
al
on
weapons of state; the majority, the officially correct are many. Voice disappears through censorship, erasure,
rs
In fact the ban culture threatens democracy and diversity in India. The new battle is between correctness and
en
m
majoritarianism on one side and democracy and the openness of creativity on the other.
cu
do
The President of India had recently said: “Pluralism and tolerance have held together for ages this civilization of
is
Th
many languages, races, religions, with diverse anthropological features.” Hence, we need to respect the
pluralism and tolerance that is present in India. We should work together to nurture this pluralism, and use this
diversity as a strength.