Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH 7-11
CH 7-11
CH 7-11
Profit
Maximization
The goal most often used is that the firm maximizes economic
profit.
3
The U.S. corporate profit tax was levied in 1909, four years
before the personal income tax.
Definition of Profits
Definition of Profits
Marginalism
Profits
(a)
0 Output
Profits
0
q1 q* q2 Output
(b) Profits
In Figure 7.1, (TC) is the total cost curve that is drawn consistent with
the discussion in Chapter 6.
11
Profits
(a)
0 Output
Profits
0
q1 q* q2 Output
(b) Profits
As drawn in the figure, profits reach their maximum at the output level q*.
12
Profits
(a)
0 Output
Profits
0
q1 q* q2 Output
(b) Profits
Profits
(a)
0 Output
Profits
0
q1 q* q2 Output
(b) Profits
(a)
0 Output
Profits
0
q1 q* q2 Output
(b) Profits
MR = MC to reach maximum
16
Marginal Revenue
A Numerical Example
Assume the quantity demanded of tape cassettes from a
particular store per week (Q) is related to the price (P) by
Q = 10 - P.
MR = D TR > 0
DQ
21
A Numerical Example
A Numerical Example
If the firm wants to sell four tapes it must reduce the price to
$6.
24
Demand
Casette Tapes
0 1 2 3 4 10
q*
If the firm wants to sell four tapes it must reduce the price to $6.
25
A Numerical Example
• But, to sell the fourth tape, it must reduce its selling price on the
first three tapes from $7 to $6 which reduces revenue by $3,
which is shown in the lightly shaded rectangle.
26
But, to sell the fourth tape, it must reduce its selling price on the first three tapes
from $7 to $6 which reduces revenue by $3, which is shown in the lightly shaded
rectangle.
27
A Numerical Example
Percentage change in Q
eq , P .
Percentage change in P
Percentage change in q
eq , P .
Percentage change in P
29
(0 eq,P > -1), a rise in the price will cause total revenues to
rise.
1
MR P 1
e
q , P
For example, if eq,P < -1 (elastic), this equation shows
that MR is positive.
32
Price
P1
0 q1 Quantity
per week
Marginal Revenue
37
Since the firm has no effect on the price it receives for its
product, the goal of maximizing profits dictates that it should
produce the quantity for which marginal cost equals price.
Price SMC
E SAC
P* = MR
0
q* Quantity
per week
39
P**
SAC
P* = MR E
A
F
P***
P1
0
q1 q*** q* q** Quantity
per week
P**
SAC
P* = MR E
A
F
P***
P1
0
q1 q*** q* q** Quantity
per week
At P* profits are positive since P > SAC, but at a price such as P***, short-
run profits would be negative
41
P**
P* = MR SAC
E
A
F
P***
P1
0
q1 q*** q* q** Quantity
per week
If price just equaled average cost (and marginal cost), short-run profits
equal zero
42
P**
SAC
P* = MR E
A
F
P***
P1
0
q1 q*** q* q** Quantity
per week
P**
P* = MR SAC
E
A
F
P***
P1
0
q1 q*** q* q** Quantity
per week
P**
SAC
P* = MR E
A
F
P***
P1
0
q1 q*** q* q** Quantity
per week
Total profits are given by the area P*EFA which can be calculated by
multiplying profits per unit (P* - A) times the firm’s chosen output level q*.
45
P**
SAC
P* = MR E
A
F
P***
P1
0
q1 q*** q* q** Quantity
per week
For this situation to truly be a maximum profit, the marginal cost curve
must also be be increasing (it would be a profit minimum if the marginal
cost curve was decreasing).
46
For all possible prices, the marginal cost curve shows how
much output the firm should supply.
47
For very low prices, the firm could also produce zero output.
Since fixed costs are incurred whether or not the firm
produces any goods, the decision to produce is based on
short-run variable costs.
48
P q SVC
or, dividing by q,
SVC
P .
q
• The shutdown price is the price below which the firm will
choose to produce no output in the short-run. It is equal to
minimum average variable costs.
Notice, the firm will still produce if P < SAC, so long as it can
cover its fixed costs.
Price SMC
P1
0
Quantity
per week
52
Unlike the physician, the patient must pay the medical bills.
56
Incentive Contracts
This would return to the original case and result in *, B*.
Incentive Contracts
Perfect
Competition
2
Timing of a Supply Response
3
Pricing in the Very Short Run
4
FIGURE 8.1: Pricing in the Very
Short Run
0 Q* Quantity
per week
5
Pricing in the Very Short Run
6
FIGURE 8.1: Shifts in Demand with
Price as a Rationing Device
0 Q* Quantity
per week
7
FIGURE 8.1: Pricing in the Very
Short Run
P1
D’
0 Q* Quantity
per week
8
FIGURE 8.1: Pricing in the Very
Short Run
Price
S In the short run, P goes up
because there is only firm
P2
produces the good at Q*
P1
D’
0 Q* Quantity
per week
9
Short-Run Supply
10
Construction of a Short-Run Supply
Curve
11
FIGURE 8.2: Short-Run Market
Supply Curve
SA
12
FIGURE 8.2: Short-Run Market
Supply Curve
SA SB
SA SB S
The market supply curve is the horizontal sum of the two firms are every
price.
Q1 equals the sum of q1A and q1B.
SA SB S
The market equilibrium where the market demand curve D and the
short-run supply curve S intersect at a price of P1 and quantity Q1
SAC
P1
D
d
SAC
P2
D’
P1 d’
D
d
17
Functions of the Equilibrium Price
18
Interaction of Many Individuals and Firms
Determine market price in the Short Run
Given the price, utility maximizing individuals will decide how much of their
limited incomes to spend
• At price P1 the total quantity demanded is Q1.
• No other price brings about the balance of quantity demanded and
quantity supplied.
FIGURE 8.3:
Price SMC Price S Price
SAC
P2
D’
P1 d’
D
d
If the typical person’s demand for the good increases from d to d’, the
entire market demand curve will shift to D’ as shown in figure 8.3.
SAC
P2
D’
P1 d’
D
d
20
Interaction of Many Individuals and Firms
Determine market price in the Short Run
SAC
P2
D’
P1 d’
D
d
21
Interaction of Many Individuals and Firms
Determine market price in the Short Run
SAC
P2
D’
P1 d’
D
d
22
Interaction of Many Individuals and Firms
Determine market price in the Short Run
SAC
P2
D’
P1 d’
D
d
23
Interaction of Many Individuals and Firms
Determine market price in the Short Run
SAC
P2
D’
P1 d’
D
d
24
Shifts in Demand Curves
25
Shifts in Demand Curves
26
Shifts in Supply Curves
27
Table 8.1: Reasons for a Shift in a
Demand or Supply Curve
Demand Supply
29
Short-Run Supply Elasticity
30
Shits in Supply Curves and the Importance of
the Shape of the Demand Curve
31
Effect of a Shift in the Short-Run Supply
Curve on the Shape of the Demand Curve
FIGURE 8.4
Price Price
S
S
D P
P
Quantity Q Quantity
0 Q per week 0
per week
(a) Elastic Demand (b) Inelastic Demand
32
Effect of a Shift in the Short-Run Supply
Curve on the Shape of the Demand Curve
Price S’ Price
S S’
S
P’
P’
D P
P
0 Q’ Q Quantity 0 Q’ Q Quantity
per week per week
(a) Elastic Demand (b) Inelastic Demand
D
Quantity Quantity
per week per week
0 Q’ Q 0 Q’ Q
(a) Elastic Demand (b) Inelastic Demand
Figure 8.5
S
Price Price
P’ S
P P
D D
0 Q Quantity 0 Q Quantity
per week per week
Price S Price
P’ S
P’
P P
D’
D’
D D
Quantity 0 Quantity
0 Q Q’ Q Q’
per week per week
(a) Inelastic Supply (b) Elastic Supply
37
A Numerical Illustration
38
FIGURE 8.6: Demand and Supply
Curves for Cassette Tapes
Pric
e
S
1
0 Demand : Q 10 P [8.2]
Supply : Q P 2 [8.3]
6
D
0 4 1
39 0 Tapes
per
FIGURE 8.6: Demand and Supply
Curves for Cassette Tapes
Pric
e Since the supply curve intersects
the vertical axis at P = 2, this is the
S
1
shutdown price.
0
D
0 4 1 Tapes
40 0 per week
FIGURE 8.6: Demand and Supply
Curves for Cassette Tapes
7
As shown in Figure 8.6, the new
6 equilibrium price is $7 where the
5 quantity demanded and supplied of
tapes is 5.
2
D D’
0 3 4 5 6 10 12 Tapes
per week
41
FIGURE 8.6: Demand and Supply
Curves for Cassette Tapes
Price
New Demand Curve
Q 12 P [8.4]
$12
S
10
7
6
5
Demand : Q 10 P [8.2]
Old Demand Curve
D D’
0 3 4 5 6 10 12 Tapes
per week
42
FIGURE 8.6: Demand and Supply
Curves for Cassette Tapes
Price
• After the increase in demand,
$12
S
there is an excess demand for
10 tapes at the old equilibrium price of
$6.
D D’
0 3 4 5 6 10 12 Tapes
per week
43
TABLE 8.2: Supply and Demand Equilibrium in the
Market for Cassette Tapes
Supply Demand
Case 1 Case 2
Q=P-2 Q = 10 – P q = 12 – P
Quantity Supplied Quantity Demanded Quantity Demanded
Price (Tapes per Week) (Tapes per Week) (Tapes per Week)
$10 8 0 2
9 7 1 3
8 6 2 4
7 5 3 5
6 4 4 6
5 3 5 7
4 2 6 8
3 1 7 9
2 0 8 10
1 0 9 11
0 0 10 12
45
Equilibrium Conditions
46
Profit Maximization
47
Entry and Exit
48
Entry and Exit
49
Long-Run Equilibrium
50
Long-Run Equilibrium
51
FIGURE 8.7: Long-Run Equilibrium for a Perfectly
Competitive Constant Market: Cost Case
Price Price
MC S
AC
P1 = MC = min AC
0 q1 Output Q1 Quantity
0
per week
(a) Typical Firm (b) Total Market
Price Price
MC S
AC
P1 = MC = min AC
0 q1 Output Q1 Quantity
0
per week
(a) Typical Firm (b) Total Market
Price Price
MC S
AC
P1 = MC = min AC
0 q1 Output Q1 Quantity
0
per week
(a) Typical Firm (b) Total Market
Figure 8.7 (b) shows that market where the market demand and
supply curves are D and S, respectively, and equilibrium price is P1.
54
FIGURE 8.7: Long-Run Equilibrium for a Perfectly
Competitive Constant Market: Cost Case
Price Price
MC S
AC
P2
P1
D’
D
Price Price
MC S
AC
P2
P1
D’
D
Price Price
MC S
AC
S’
P2
P1 LS
0 q1 q2 Output Q 1 Q2 Q3 Quantity
0
(a) Typical Firm per week
(b) Total Market
Positive economic profits cause new firms to enter the market until
economic profits again equal zero.
57
Long-Run Supply: The Constant
Cost Case
59
FIGURE 8.7: A Shift in Demand
Price Price
MC S
AC
S’
P2
P1 LS
0 q1 q2 Output Q 1 Q2 Q3 Quantity
0
(a) Typical Firm per week
(b) Total Market
Since costs do no increase with entry, the typical firm’s costs curves
do not change.
60
FIGURE 8.7: Long-Run Equilibrium for a Perfectly
Competitive Constant Market: Cost Case
Price Price
P2
P1 LS
0 q1 q2 Output Q 1 Q2 Q3 Quantity
0
(a) Typical Firm per week
(b) Total Market
MC S
AC
S’
P2
P1 LS
0 q1 q2 Output Q 1 Q2 Q3 Quantity
0
(a) Typical Firm per week
(b) Total Market
Price Price
MC S
AC
S’
P2
P LS
1
Price Price
MC S
AC
S’
P2
P LS
1
The long-run supply curve is horizontal at the low point of the firms
64 long-run average total cost curves.
FIGURE 8.7: Long-Run Supply Curve
Price Price
MC S
AC
S’
P2
P LS
1
P1 P1
Output Quantity
Output Q1 per week
q1 q2 0 q3 0
0
(a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market
This case is shown in Figure 8.8, where the initial equilibrium price is P1
with the typical firm producing q1 with total output Q1.
67 • Economic profits are zero.
FIGURE 8.8: Increasing Costs Result in a
Positively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve
Price Price
Price D’ S
MC D
AC
P2 MC P2
AC
P1 P1 2
Quantity
Output Output per week
0 q1 q2 0 q3 0 Q1 Q2 Q3
(a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market
Quantity
Output Output per week
0 q1 q2 0 q3 0 Q1 Q2 Q3
(a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market
Price
Price Price D’ S S’
MC D
AC LS
P2 MC P2
AC
P3 P3
P1 P1 2
0 q1 q2 0 q3 0 Q1 Q2 Q3
(a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market
Price
Price Price D’ S S’
MC D
AC LS
P2 MC P2
AC
P3 P3
P1 P1 2
71
Long-Run Supply Elasticity
72
TABLE 8.3: Estimated Long-Run Supply
Elasticities
73
The Decreasing Cost Case
74
The Decreasing Cost Case
75
FIGURE 8.9: Decreasing Costs Result in a
Negatively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve
Price Price S
Price
D
P2 MC
AC
MC
P1 AC P1 2
P2 MC P2
AC
MC
P1 AC P1 2
Price Price S
Price D’
D
P2 MC P2
AC MC
P1 AC P1 2
Quantity
Output Output per week
0 q1 q2 0 0 Q1 Q2
(a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market
Entry drives down costs for the typical firm, as shown in Figure 8.9 (b).
78
FIGURE 8.9: Decreasing Costs Result in a
Negatively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve
Price D’ S
Price Price
D
P2 MC P2
AC S’
MC
P1 AC P1 2
P3 P3
LS
q1 q2 Output 0 q3 Output 0 Q2 Q3
0 Q1
Quantity
(a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market
P2 MC P2
AC S’
MC
P1 AC P1 2
P3 P3
LS
0 q1 q2 Output 0 q3 Output 0 Q1 Q2 Q3
(a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market Quantity
81
APPLICATION 8.4: How Do Network
Externalities Affect Supply Curves?
Telecommunications
– Most of the gains in developed countries have been
realized, but remain for less developed.
Computer Software
– As adoption grows, lower learning costs for users.
83
Infant Industries
84
Chapter 9
Applying the
Competitive
Model
2
FIGURE 9.1: Competitive Equilibrium
and Consumer/Producer Surplus
Price
A
S
In Figure 9.1, the
equilibrium price and
quantity are P* & Q*
P* E
The demand curve, D,
shows what people are
willing to pay for the good.
D
B
Price
A
S
Price
A
S
Consumers
P* E
expenditures for Q*
are given by the
area P*EQ*0
D
B
0 Q* Quantity
5 per period
FIGURE 9.1: Competitive Equilibrium and
Consumer/Producer Surplus
Price
A S
Consumers receive a
“surplus” (total value
P* E less what they pay)
equal to the area AEP*,
which is shaded gray in
Fig 9.1.
D
B
0 Q* Quantity
6 per period
Producer Surplus
7
Producer Surplus
8
FIGURE 9.1: Competitive Equilibrium and
Consumer/Producer Surplus
Price
A
S
At the equilibrium
shown in Figure 9.1,
P* E producers receive
total revenue equal to
the area P*EQ*0.
D
B
0 Q* Quantity
9
FIGURE 9.1: Competitive Equilibrium and
Consumer/Producer Surplus
Price
A
S
0 Q* Quantity
10
FIGURE 9.1: Competitive Equilibrium and
Consumer/Producer Surplus
Price
A
S
Thus, producer
surplus the the area
P* E P*EB shaded in
green in Figure 9.1
D
B
0 Q* Quantity
11
Short-Run Producer Surplus
12
Short-Run Producer Surplus
13
Long-Run Producer Surplus
14
Long-Run Producer Surplus
15
Ricardian Rent
17
Ricardian Rent
18
FIGURE 9.2 (d): The Market
Price
P* E
Q* Q per
period
19
FIGURE 9.2 (a): Low-Cost Farm
Price
MC
AC
P*
q* q per
period
20
FIGURE 9.2 (b): Medium-Cost Farm
Price MC
AC
P*
q* q per
period
21
FIGURE 9.2 (c): Marginal Farm
Price
MC AC
P*
q* q per
period
22
FIGURE 9.2: Ricardian Rent
Price Price
MC AC
MC AC
P* P*
q* q per q* q per
period period
(a) Low-Cost Farm (b) Medium-Cost Farm
Price Price
MC AC
S
P* P* E
D
B
q* q per Q* Q per
period period
(c) Marginal Farm (d) The Market
23
Ricardian Rent
24
Economic Efficiency
25
FIGURE 9.1: Competitive Equilibrium and
Consumer/Producer Surplus
Price
A
S
In Figure 9.1, an
P1 F output level of Q1
results in a loss of
P* E surplus equal to
P2
the area FEG
G
D
B
0 Q1 Q* Quantity
26 per period
FIGURE 9.1: Competitive Equilibrium and
Consumer/Producer Surplus
Price
A
S
F Consumers would be
P1
willing to pay P1 for a
P* E good that producers
are willing to produce
P2
G
for P2, so mutually
beneficial transactions
D exist.
B
0 Q1 Q* Quantity
27 per period
APPLICATION 9.1: Does Buying Things
on the Internet Improve Welfare?
28
APPLICATION 9.1: Does Buying Things
on the Internet Improve Welfare?
29
APPLICATION 9.1: Does Buying Things
on the Internet Improve Welfare?
Retailers as Infomediaries
– The role for retailing “middlemen” on the internet is
to provide information to the consumer.
Internet automobile sellers provide comparative information
about the features of cars and point to dealers with the best
price.
Internet airline services search for the lowest price or most
convenient departure.
30
A Numerical Example
Demand : Q 10 P
Supply : Q P 2
31
FIGURE 9.3: Efficiency in Tape Sales
Price
10
The market
6 E equilibrium is P* = $6
and Q* = 4.
1 2 3 4 5 Tapes
32 per period
FIGURE 9.3: Efficiency in Tape Sales
Price
10
The equilibrium is
shown as point E
6 E in Figure 9.3.
1 2 3 4 5 Tapes
33 per period
FIGURE 9.3: Efficiency in Tape Sales
Price
10
1 2 3 4 5 Tapes
34 per period
FIGURE 9.3: Efficiency in Tape Sales
Price
10
Producers also
6 E gain a producer
surplus of $8 at
point E
D
1 2 3 4 5 Tapes
35 per period
FIGURE 9.3: Efficiency in Tape Sales
Price
10
Total consumer
6 E and producer
surplus is $16.
D
1 2 3 4 5 Tapes
36 per period
FIGURE 9.3: Efficiency in Tape Sales
Price
10
If price stays at $6
6 E but output falls to
3, total surplus
(CS + PS) falls to
D
$15
2
38
A Numerical Example
39
Tax Incidence
40
FIGURE 9.5: Effect of the Imposition of a Specific Tax
on a Perfectly Competitive Constant Cost Industry
Price Price S’
S
SMC MC P4
AC P3
P1 LS
P2
Tax D
D’
0 q2 q 1 Output 0 Q3 Q2 Q1 Quantity
per week
(a) Typical Firm (b) The Market
41
Tax Incidence
42
Short-Run Tax Incidence
43
Long-Run Tax Incidence
45
FIGURE 9.6: Tax Incidence in an
Increasing Cost Industry
Price LS
A
P3
P1 B E1
P2
E2
Tax
D
D’
Q2 Q1 Quantity
46 per period
FIGURE 9.6: Long-Run Incidence with
Increasing Costs
Price LS
D
D’
Quantity
Q2 Q1
47
FIGURE 9.6: Long-Run Incidence with
Increasing Costs
Price LS
D
D’
Quantity
Q2 Q1
48
Long-Run Incidence with
Increasing Costs
49
Incidence and Elasticity
50
Taxation and Efficiency
51
FIGURE 9.6: Taxation and Efficiency
Price LS
D
D’
Quantity
Q2 Q1
52
FIGURE 9.6:Taxation and Efficiency
Price LS
D
D’
Quantity
Q2 Q1
53
Taxation and Efficiency
54
A Numerical Illustration
55
A Numerical Illustration
Demand : Q 10 ( P t )
Q 10 ( P 2) 8 P
56
A Numerical Illustration
57
Transactions Costs
58
Transactions Costs
59
Appendix to
Chapter 9
General
Equilibrium
2
General Equilibrium Model
3
Perfectly Competitive Price System
4
Perfectly Competitive Price System
5
Efficient Markets
Efficient Consumption: MRS = price ratio
Efficient Production:
MRTS = price ratio of inputs
7
Fundamental Theorem of Welfare
Economics
A perfectly competitive price system will bring about an
economically efficient allocation of resources.
Nothing is wasted
8
Efficiency in Output Mix
9
Prices, Efficiency, and Laissez-
Faire Economics
10
Prices, Efficiency, and Laissez-
Faire Economics
11
APPLICATION 9A.1: Modern Resistance
to Trade
12
APPLICATION 9A.1: Adjustment Costs
13
Why Markets Fail to Achieve
Economic Efficiency
Imperfect competition
Externalities
Public goods
Imperfect information
14
Imperfect Competition
15
Externalities
16
Externalities
17
Public Goods
18
Public Goods
19
Imperfect Information
20
Efficiency and Equity
21
Equity and Competitive Markets
22
Pareto Efficient Allocation
23
Chapter 10
Monopoly
2
Causes of Monopoly
3
Technical Barriers to Entry
4
Technical Barriers to Entry
5
Legal Barriers to Entry
P > MC
8
FIGURE 10.1: Profit Maximization and Price
Determination in a Monopoly Market
MC
Price
AC QC is the profit
PM
E maximizing output
level in Fig 10.1
A PC = min AC
PC
MR
0 QM Quantity
QC
9
FIGURE 10.1: Profit Maximization and Price
Determination in a Monopoly Market
MC
Price
AC QC is the profit
PM
E maximizing output
level in Fig 10.1
A PC = min AC
PC
MR
0 QM Quantity
QC
10
FIGURE 10.1: Profit Maximization and Price
Determination in a Monopoly Market
MC
Price
AC
Profits are
E maximized when
PM
MR = MC
A
PC
MR
0 QM Quantity
QC
11
FIGURE 10.1: Profit Maximization and Price
Determination in a Monopoly Market
MC
Price
AC
Given output level
E QC, the firm
PM
chooses PC on the
demand curve
A because that is
PC
what consumers
D are willing to pay
for PC.
MR
0 QM Quantity
QC
12
FIGURE 10.1: Profit Maximization and Price
Determination in a Monopoly Market
MC
Price
AC
With a fixed
E market demand
PM
curve, the supply
“curve” for a
A monopoly is the
PC
one point where
D MR = MC
MR
0 QM Quantity
QC
13
FIGURE 10.1: Profit Maximization and Price
Determination in a Monopoly Market
MC
Price
AC
At QM, output
E produced is even
PM
less than the
output provided
A by perfect
PC
competition,
D
QM < QC
MR
0 QM Quantity
QC
14
FIGURE 10.1: Profit Maximization and Price
Determination in a Monopoly Market
MC
Price
AC
The monopolist’s
E profits is given by
PM
the area PMEAPC
Monopoly
profits A
PC
MR
0 QM Quantity
QC
15
Monopoly ProfitsBB
16
Monopoly Rents
Profitability
– Monopoly power is the ability to raise
price above marginal cost.
– Profits are the difference between price and
average cost.
18
FIGURE 10.2: Monopoly Profits Depend on the Relationship
between the Demand and Average Cost Curves
Price Price
MC AC
MC AC
PM
PM= min AC
AC
D
D
MR MR
0 QM Quantity 0 QM Quantity
per week per week
(a) Monopoly with Large Profits (b) Zero-Profit Monopoly
19
What’s Wrong with Monopoly?
21
What’s Wrong with Monopoly
22
Distortion of Resource Allocation
23
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and
Distributional Effects of Monopoly
D MR
Price The competitive output
level (QC in Figure 10.3)
is produced at price PC.
PM B
E
PC MC ( =AC)
A
24 0 QC
QM Quantity per week
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and
Distributional Effects of Monopoly
D MR
Price
At perfect competition,
the consumer surplus is
PM B DEPC.
E
PC MC ( =AC)
A
25 0 QC
QM Quantity per week
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and
Distributional Effects of Monopoly
Price D
MR
A monopolist produces
at QM where marginal
revenue equals
PM B
marginal cost.
MC ( =AC)
A
26 0
QM Quantity
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and
Distributional Effects of Monopoly
D MR
Price The restriction in
output (QM - QC) is a
measure of the harm
PM B
done by a monopoly
E
PC MC ( =AC)
A
27 0 QC
QM Quantity per week
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and
Distributional Effects of Monopoly
D MR
Price Consumer surplus is
reduced by the area
DBPM.
PM B
E
PC MC ( =AC)
A
28 0 QC
QM Quantity per week
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and
Distributional Effects of Monopoly
Price
D MR
The loss of consumer
surplus is BEA which is
often called the
PM B
deadweight loss from
monopoly.
E
PC MC ( =AC)
A
29 0 QC
QM Quantity per week
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and
Distributional Effects of Monopoly
Price
D MR
Monopoly profits equal
the area PMBAPC
PM B
E
PC MC ( =AC)
A
30 0 QC
QM Quantity per week
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and
Distributional Effects of Monopoly
PM B
It does not necessarily
represent a loss of
social welfare.
E
PC MC ( =AC)
A
31 0 QC
QM Quantity per week
Distributional Effects
32
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and
Distributional Effects of Monopoly
Price D
MR
P** B
Transfer
from
consumers
to firm
E
P* MC ( =AC)
A
33 0
Q** Q* Quantity per week
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and
Distributional Effects of Monopoly
Price D MR
P** B
Transfer
from
consumers Deadweight
to firm loss
E
P* MC ( =AC)
A Value of
transferred
inputs
34 0
Q** Q* Quantity per week
Monopolists’ Costs
35
Monopolists’ Costs
36
A Numerical Illustration of
Deadweight Loss
MC = AC = 3.
Find PC and PM
Find QC and QM
What is CSC and CSM
How much is the DWL?
37
TABLE 10.1: Effects of Monopolization on
the Market for Cassette Tapes
39
FIGURE 10.4: Targets for Price
Discrimination
Price D
MR
B
P**
E MC ( =AC)
P*
A
40 0 Q** Q* Quantity
per week
Perfect Price Discrimination
41
FIGURE 10.4: Perfect Price
Discrimination
Price
MC ( =AC)
P* A E
D
MR
42 0 Q** Q* Quantity
per week
FIGURE 10.4: Perfect Price
Discrimination
Price
PMAX MR
If the firm charges at the
maximum price, PMAX, all
consumer surplus (area
B P*DE) would be monopoly
P**
profit.
MC ( =AC)
P* A E
D
MR
43 0 Q** Q* Quantity
per week
Perfect Price Discrimination
45
Quantity Discounts:
46
FIGURE 10.4i: Quantity Discount
Price
MC ( =AC)
P* A E
D
MR
47 0 Q** Q* Quantity
per week
FIGURE 10.4i: Quantity Discount
Price
PMAX MR
Different prices for different
markets/ consumers
Market 1
B Selective Price Discrimination
P**
Market 2
MC ( =AC)
P* A E
D
MR
48 0 Q** Q* Quantity
per week
FIGURE 10.4: Perfect Price
Discrimination
Price
PMAX MR
B
P**
MC ( =AC)
P* A E
D
MR
49 0 Q** Q* Quantity
per week
Two-Part Tariffs
51
FIGURE 10.5: Separated Markets Raise the
Possibility of Price Discrimination
Price
P1
P2
MC1
D1 D2
MR1 MR2
Q1* 0 Q2*
Quantity in market 1 Quantity in market 2
52
FIGURE 10.5: Separated Markets Raise the
Possibility of Price Discrimination
Price
P1
P2
MC1
D1 D2
MR1 MR2
Q1* 0 Q2*
Quantity in market 1 Quantity in market 2
53
FIGURE 10.5: Separated Markets Raise the
Possibility of Price Discrimination
Price
P1
P2
MC1
D1 D2
MR1 MR2
Q1* 0 Q2*
Quantity in market 1 Quantity in market 2
Price
P1
P2
MC1
D1 D2
MR1 MR2
Q1* 0 Q2*
Quantity in market 1 Quantity in market 2
56
Chapter 11
Imperfect
Competition
2
Pricing of Homogeneous Goods
4
Quasi-Competitive Model
5
FIGURE 11.1: Pricing under
Imperfect Competition
Price
C
P MC
C
MR
0 Q Quantity
6 C per week
Cartel Model
7
FIGURE 11.1: Pricing under
Imperfect Competition
Price
Assuming marginal costs are constant
and equal across firms, the cartel
output is point M (the monopoly
P M
M output) in Figure 11.1
P A
A
C
P MC The plan would
C
require a certain
output by each firm
D and how to share
the monopoly profits
MR
0 Q Q Q Quantity
M A C
8 per week
Cartel Model
9
Cartel Model
10
The Cournot ModelBB
11
The Cournot Model
12
FIGURE 11.2: Spring Monopolist’s
Output Choice
Price
120
60
MR D
Output
13 0 60 120
per week
Duopoly Model
Q q A qB 120 P
Assuming q B is fixed, A' s demand curve is
q A (120 qB ) P.
14
Duopoly Model
120 q B
qA . [11.4]
2
15
Duopoly Model
16
FIGURE 11.3: Cournot Reaction
Functions in a Duopoly Market
120
Output of
firm B(qB)
Firm A’s reactions
Output of
17 0 60 120
firm A(qA)
Duopoly Model
120 q A
qB [11.5]
2
18
FIGURE 11.3: Cournot Reaction
Functions in a Duopoly Market
120
Output of
firm B(qB) Firm B’s reactions
60
Equilibrium
Firm A’s reactions
Output of
19 0 60 120 firm A(qA)
Cournot Equilibrium
20
FIGURE 11.3: Cournot Reaction
Functions in a Duopoly Market
120
Output of
firm B(qB) Firm A’s reactions
60
Equilibrium
40 Firm B’s reactions
Output of
21 0 40 60 120
firm A(qA)
Cournot Equilibrium
22
Price Leadership Model
23
FIGURE 11.4: Formal Model of Price
Leadership Model
Price
SC
Quantity D
per week
24 0
FIGURE 11.4: Formal Model of Price
Leadership Model
Price
SC
Quantity D
per week
25 0
FIGURE 11.4: Formal Model of Price
Leadership Model
Price
SC
Quantity D
per week
26 0
FIGURE 11.4: Formal Model of Price
Leadership Model
Price
SC
0 Quantity
27 per week
FIGURE 11.4: Formal Model of Price
Leadership Model
Price
SC
P1: small firms will all
produce the Q demanded
0 Quantity
28 per week
FIGURE 11.4: Formal Model of Price
Leadership Model
Price
SC
0 Quantity
29 per week
FIGURE 11.4: Formal Model of Price
Leadership Model
Price
SC
0 Q Q Q Quantity
30 C L T per week
FIGURE 11.4: Formal Model of Price
Leadership Model
Price
SC
0 Q Q Q Quantity
31 C L T per week
Product Differentiation: Market
Definition and Firms Choices
32
Product Differentiation: Market
Equilibrium
34
Monopolistic Competition
35
Monopolistic Competition
36
Sustainability of Monopolistic
Competition
37
Barriers to Entry
38