Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 16 views

    In The United States Court of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit: Filed

    Uploaded by

    GAIN Coalition
    This document is a judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the case of Atchafalaya Basinkeeper et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al (Case No. 18-30257). The Fifth Circuit vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Fifth Circuit's opinion. One of the circuit judges dissented from the judgment. Costs on appeal were ordered to be paid by the plaintiffs-appellees.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    In The United States Court of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit: Filed

    Uploaded by

    GAIN Coalition
    16 views2 pages
    This document is a judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the case of Atchafalaya Basinkeeper et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al (Case No. 18-30257). The Fifth Circuit vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Fifth Circuit's opinion. One of the circuit judges dissented from the judgment. Costs on appeal were ordered to be paid by the plaintiffs-appellees.

    Original Description:

    Judgment 7-6-18

    Original Title

    Judgment 7-6-18

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the case of Atchafalaya Basinkeeper et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al (Case No. 18-30257). The Fifth Circuit vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Fifth Circuit's opinion. One of the circuit judges dissented from the judgment. Costs on appeal were ordered to be paid by the plaintiffs-appellees.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    16 views2 pages

    In The United States Court of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit: Filed

    Uploaded by

    GAIN Coalition
    This document is a judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the case of Atchafalaya Basinkeeper et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al (Case No. 18-30257). The Fifth Circuit vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Fifth Circuit's opinion. One of the circuit judges dissented from the judgment. Costs on appeal were ordered to be paid by the plaintiffs-appellees.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Case: 18-30257 Document: 00514544176 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/06/2018

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    _______________________ United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit

    FILED
    No. 18-30257 July 6, 2018
    _______________________
    D.C. Docket No. 3:18-CV-23 Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk

    ATCHAFALAYA BASINKEEPER; LOUISIANA CRAWFISH PRODUCERS


    ASSOCIATION-WEST; GULF RESTORATION NETWORK;
    WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE; SIERRA CLUB, and its Delta Chapter,

    Plaintiffs - Appellees

    v.

    UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,

    Defendant - Appellant

    BAYOU BRIDGE PIPELINE, L.L.C.; STUPP BROTHERS,


    INCORPORATED, doing business as Stupp Corporation,

    Intervenor Defendants - Appellants

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the


    Middle District of Louisiana

    Before REAVLEY, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

    JUDGMENT

    This cause was considered on the record on appeal and was argued by
    counsel.

    It is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court is


    vacated, and the cause is remanded to the District Court for further
    proceedings in accordance with the opinion of this Court.
    Case: 18-30257 Document: 00514544176 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/06/2018

    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs-appellees pay to appellants


    the costs on appeal to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court.

    REAVLEY, Circuit Judge, dissents

    You might also like