Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Larkin You Know Safety But Not Communication
Larkin You Know Safety But Not Communication
rea 3
Beg in in A e
tion to to mad
d Ins pec r s o n nel are analysis
Risk -Base ontrac
tp e an
ucting fforts to
n c e , and C will be cond r y ’s e
, M a in tena
ti o n te am f th e refine
s o
erator ased Inspec going part
a 3 Op B on
All Are at the Risk- ment as an alitativ
e
th
aware ssured equ
ip
ti n g b oth qu ure and
il
re
of all p process sa
fety. integra od of fa d list of
v e e th o dology the likeliho r it iz e
impr o risk m both a pr io tivity
e c ti o n is a r combining to establish e a d ded ac g
sp s fo , alu in
ased In cesse atically high-v etermin
Risk-B ntitative pro ilure, system k basis. This dology for d on
a fa ris o cti
and qu equence of sing a total eatable meth s and inspe
e c o ns e n t u d , r e p u e n c ie
th ipm nte eq
re equ ocume ction fr
pressu a logical, d tion of inspe other
4% of people can understand an average safety email
provid
es
timum s.
c o m bina
th e r e fi nery’s ction
e
the op y with e Insp e
s /m e thod s in h armon RCM, and th ls and scop
scope t w o r k Z O P , te r v a c h a s
bu HA on in dards,
su
t tr a n sgress s including ed inspecti s ta n g
es no itiativ e mend es an d s Pip in
RBI do n-related in . RBI recom pection cod 570 (Proces ard). RBI
c ti o r a m in s P I- Sta d allowing
n
inspe ment Prog stry
e indu ection Code k Inspection
), A
n a g e a te th input
Ma
a y in valid e s s e l Insp torage Tan g v a luable
in no w (Pressure V API-653 (S ons providin
0 nd ati s.
API-51 n Code), a recommend on resource numbe -
r of
e c ti o e s e p e c ti ld s a
Ins p th
s within ften limited
ins yie spec
e r a te o R B I a nalysis , focused in
o p f lied bilit y ance
ation o tly app ity and relia osts, compli nd
optimiz ns is te n
tiv ec ou
and co produc tenanc turnar
p r e h ensive : increased n and main nd improved
A com s including d inspectio ulations, a
ve ce eg
objecti urces, redu insurance r
n r e s o n d /o r
tio ry a
gulato
with re .
g
plannin
You Send Way Too Much
If employees read all the safety information you sent, refineries would look like this:
Source: O’Reilly
Amount of Information Provided
Source: Chewning
After information overload, employees have more information than they can understand.
The more information you give them, the more time and energy they spend on selecting.
Source: Iastrebova
Fixing it is easy.
Th
e res
to
ft
his
rep
ort
sh
It takes more time and effort to do high-quality communication. ow
sh
Once a commitment is made to communicate better, safety communicators will:
ow
to
do
. choose their topics more carefully (moving “selection” from receivers to senders) thi
. spend considerably more time preparing each piece of communication s.
. and consequently, produce much less of it
4
4% of People Can Understand An Average Safety Email
* **
Sample: U.S. adult average reading level is 7th grade.
1 3 oil refineries; 1 chemical refinery (4 separate companies) For most adults, reading skills decline over time. So, on average,
8 frontline supervisors gave us 3 samples of safety communication an adult’s reading level is 5 grade levels lower than the last grade
randomly selected from their email inboxes he/she actually completed. Adults with reading levels below 5th
24 total pieces of safety communication studied grade rarely use print to get information. Instead they rely on oral
average grade level 15.5 sources (TV/radio, family and friends).
Flesch-Kincaid readability formula
Sources: Aldridge, Brownson
Sources: DuBay, Montondon 16th grade level
grade 16 = 12 years (elementary/high school) + 4 years (university)
4% of U.S. population can understand
Background: A contractor was taking down scaffolding located on top of a fin-fan cooler. The fan
blades were covered by a fence-type cage mesh. Unfortunately this cage mesh was torn in places.
The contractor accidently stepped on the torn mesh, his leg broke through and was cut by the
rotating blades. Later, in hospital, his leg was amputated below the knee.
:
cluded
tions in
orrec tive Ac Asset
nded C tion for f risk
me descrip oordination o
Recom
commu
n ic a te th e jo
to inclu
b
d e , “t h e c
Average safety communication
ate and ce Planners system
1. Upd tenan th e job.” to Work it the
a in r
Field /M
t re le v an t fo
v is e d Permit , to v is
men e re legate
assess effect th er, or his de
ediate su
e n t w ith imm authoriser/is ertificate.
m W ce C
2. Imple uires the PT ts to
which
req
e b e fo re issu
ing the
clearan
q u a lit
k asse
y of ris equate risk
ssmen
4% of adults can understand
worksit itor the d rectify inad
to mon n
rocess to address a
p le m ent a p s te p s
3. Im ia ti on ace
include ents.
rem e d
hold fa
ce-to-f
ortance
of Grade level: 16
m ders to force the imp additional
as s e s s
c to r te a m le a
to re in re a n y Words: 209
ntra ams nsu e of
and co ne in their te rocedure to e ck when scop
. O p e rations e v e ry o ti o n p o rk P a rk P a ck
4 ith pa ra W o
sions w ork Pack pre ; to revise the bs require a W understand
discus th e W lu d ed t a ll jo o ld e rs
g in c th a e h
followin ssments are point all stak
se rce the ensure
risk as nges; to reinfo lexity and to b .
c h a o m p g a jo
work their c trollin trained
, in
less of ith con
to be re odolog
y to
regard associated w esters essment meth duct a
e ri s k s re q u
th c to r P TW ri s k a ss w to c on
nd con
tra ned d ho n of
finery a y’s defi ired an n identificatio
ompan is requ o sk
5. All re ce with the c rstand what la c e d f th e ri
an de to be p ke-up o
accord at all fully un ular emphasis it and the ma
th rt ic v is
ensure ssment. Pa a site
se eed for
risk as easure, the n
tr o l m
con am.
ment te
assess
68% of adults can understand 2. The person signing the clearance certificate will also inspect
the work site.
Grade level: 5
Words: 91 3. Somebody should think of a way to spot bad risk assessments.
Safety communication at refineries is bad. Sometimes it’s worse than bad. Some,
we believe, is meant to intimidate. Some communication is meant to separate
people: the supposedly “smart” people, who possess this impenetrable vocabulary,
from supervisors and frontline employees who don’t.
Grade level: 6 They will give each piece of equipment a risk number.
Words: 127
This risk number comes from two estimates.
#1 Chances this piece of equipment will fail.
15 grade levels lower than the original #2 How big a disaster that failure would cause.
Imagine a refinery that pumps in crude from tankers and then, at the other end, pumps out crude to
terminals. That’s how many safety professionals work.
Safety professionals receive communication from the outside (e.g. API, OSHA, CSB) then pump
out the exact same communication to refinery supervisors. This is wrong. If communication
arrives on the desk of a safety professional, it should leave better than it arrived.
Why internal inspections didn’t find the gutter forming in the floor.
In 1991, the tank was inspected inside but the gutter disappeared.
Of course, crude was removed for the 1991 internal inspection.
Without the weight of the crude, the floor sprung back into shape.
And, the gutter disappeared.
When the tank was refilled, the gutter returned.
Water collected again and the corrosion continued.
We are not talking about throwing in a bunch of pictures to illustrate points in the text. No. We
are talking about hand drawing one simple diagram that captures the major points you are trying
to communicate.
Sending all this text is convenient for safety professionals but hell for frontline supervisors.
ion Trauma
thostatic In tolerance/Suspens
“Now this safety bulletin is on Safety Bulletin: Or
symptoms: light-
Orthostatic Intolerance.” d by the following adache,
ance is characterize usea, dizziness, he
Orthostatic intoler tre mu lousne ss, fat igu e, na
est
lpit atio ns, fro m fall arr
headedness, pa longed suspension
Can you guys in the back read , and fainting. Pro can result in seriou
s
sweating, weakness sta tic into ler an ce which, in turn,
this? No? Well, ah, let me try to s can cau se ort ho
sys tem
potentially, death.
talk about it. physical injury, or
w one cause is
tic intolerance sho by death
causes of orthosta ousness, followed
Research into the vic e lea din g to un con sci
sus pen-
Ah, this thing, orthostatic suspension in a fall arr est de
risk associated wit
h pro lon ge d
intolerance, is something you utes. To reduce the plans to prevent
in less than 30 min uld imp lem en t
tems, employers sho signs and sympto
ms,
can get from your safety sion in fall arrest sys static intolerance
ge d sus pe nsi on s, identifying ortho as po ssi ble .
prolon t as quick ly
harness, and well, it can kill you. cue and treatmen
and performing res n to lose
obile and were see
vol un tee rs we re suspended imm is life thr eatening
I’m not exactly sure how this In tests, health y
utes. Such suspensi
on
not
as little as five min that casualties are
happens. consciousness in ed . Aft er res cue it is ess en tial
gro un d. The
is ne ed ding on the
and urgent rescue rescue or when lan s
flat at an y tim e either during the p the m in a sitt ing position with leg
laid kee
I know if you get it, you can die. t ma na ge me nt of the casualty is to min imu m of 20 min utes, even if
correc chest for a s can harm
or pulled up to the st-rescue procedure
And you get it from your safety either straight out ilur e to follow these po
sci ou s. Fa
harness, but I’m pretty sure they are uncon death.
sometimes lead to
we’re still suppose to use safety the casualties and a
olved with work at
tems, and others inv
harnesses. use rs of pe rso na l fall protection sys
cau tion s tha t mig ht need to be taken
All ing pre
aware of the follow
height, should be being in a suspend
ed position.
ua lty ater the
Look, I’m sorry, I don’t really in the eve nt of a cas
is sus pe nd ed wit hout moving, the gre
ge r a cas ua lty
1. The lon
understand this very well.
Supervisor
But we are asking you: Who is at fault here? The supervisor, or the safety
professional who emailed this page to all the supervisors at his refinery.
His legs are full of too much “blue” blood. Don’t lay him flat.
If all that blood, with no oxgyen in it, Keep him propped up in a sitting position.
suddenly pours into this heart, it could kill No lying down for at least 20 minutes.
him. Give his heart time to adjust.
Source: Adapted from Seddon
His legs are full of too much “blue” blood. Don’t lie him down. Keep him propped up.
If all that blood, with no oxgyen in it, suddenly In a sitting position.
pours into this heart, it could kill him. No lying down for at least 30 minutes.
Give his heart time to adjust.
Source: Adapted from Seddon
Normally, when you stand up, gravity pulls your blood down
into your legs. This is OK, because your legs help the heart
Every time you use your legs, your leg muscles tighten, this
tightening pushes against the veins and blood is squeezed
back toward the heart.
If something goes wrong (the legs are not helping) the body
has a solution: fainting. This is why soldiers standing still in
formation (not using their legs) faint. Fainting flops the body
down on the ground making it easier for the heart to pump
depth than the picture. This enables supervisors to speak
with more authority and confidence.
without help from the legs.
Even after rescue, the victim can still die. The person’s legs
are now full of blood. The blood has no oxygen in it. If that
no-oxygen blood immediately gushes back into the heart, the
heart can go into shock and stop beating. This is why the victim
3.5 inch line width
Lots of white space
451/2002
Existing Information.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2002/crr02451.pdf
“Simple Text” is the background Normally, when you stand up, gravity pulls your blood
information enabling your down into your legs. This is OK, because when your legs
supervisors to confidently move they help pump the blood back up again.
discuss the topic in their safety
meetings. Every time you use your legs, your leg muscles tighten,
this tightening pushes against the veins and blood is
Simple Text
your legs are not helping your heart pump blood.
Normally, when you stand up, gravity pulls your blood down
into your legs. This is OK, because your legs help the heart
squeezed back toward the heart.
pump the blood back up.
Every time you use your legs, your leg muscles tighten, this
tightening pushes against the veins and blood is squeezed
back toward the heart.
If something goes wrong (the legs are not helping) the body
Even after rescue, the victim can still die. The person’s legs
are now full of blood. The blood has no oxygen in it. If that
no-oxygen blood immediately gushes back into the heart, the
heart can go into shock and stop beating. This is why the victim
easier for your heart to pump without help from the legs.
legs at all.
Surviving the fall is not the only danger
Hanging in the harness is dangerous too
how hard your heart tries, it can’t get your blood back up
moving his legs
to your brain; you faint, and after a while, die. His legs are full of too much “blue” blood.
If all that blood, with no oxgyen in it, suddenly
pours into this heart, it could kill him.
Don’t lay him down. Keep him propped up.
In a sitting position.
Source: Adapted from Seddon
Even after rescue, the victim can still die. The person’s
legs are now full of blood. The blood has no oxygen in it.
If all that no-oxygen blood immediately gushes back into
the heart, the heart can go into shock and stop beating.
This is why the victim must be kept upright during and
after the rescue.
Drawing one picture to describe a complex process is too difficult. A process has several steps so it takes several
pictures to describe. This example shows simple hand-drawn pictures explaining condensation-induced waterhammer.
Waterhammers are potentially dangerous shock waves that can happen when steam is mixed with a liquid.
Why does your safety communication always sound like a submission to the
Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics?
ating um
Oper r
o f Safe wdown D Snap out of it.
w lo
Revie in the B
ls
Leve f the bility
are o ta
a r e all aw unpredic der Turn your back and walk away from these goofy
We a n d s u n
bilit y flo w
varia rocarbon h heat an this
d attempts to sound smart.
y d
of h ions of h ig
q u e nt to
it nse at
cond res. Co sential th m
pres
su
, it is es
o w n dru Communicate with your supervisors and frontline
tion wd at
varia in the blo margin th ive employees as if you were a human. A real person.
t
levels in a safe e of reac ted
ta
main a full ran unexpe
g c Not a pretend scientist or academic.
s ld
allow res shou ise.
su r
mea gencies a
contin
You can’t draw like a professional. Good. You don’t want professional drawings.
Professional illustrations and photographs increase attention (more people look at it)
but not comprehension.
Professional drawings and photographs deliver too much detail. This details
becomes noise distracting the reader from the main point.
source: Houts
To maximize comprehension make your drawings crude and simple.
Here is what it takes to improve your safety communication by more than 100%:
Few things in communication research are known with certainty, here is one of them:
Adding crude drawings to text brings huge increases in comprehension. source: Paivio
For example, Professor Richard Mayer, University of California, added these five
drawings to a 600-word college-textbook explanation of lightning. The result?
Students’ test scores jumped by 113%.
Ice crystals
Freezing level
Upward-moving
Warm moist air leader
Wind gusts
1. Warm moist air rises, 2. Raindrops and ice 3. Negatively charged 4. Two leaders meet, 5. Positively charged
water vapor condenses crystals drag air particles fall to bottom negatively charged particles from the
and forms cloud. downward. of cloud. particles rush from ground rush upward
cloud to ground. along the same path.
Don’t let some fear of drawing you picked up as a 10-year-old stop you from
dramatically improving your safety communication.
You are not ready for advanced communication. Refineries need to master the basics first.
Mastering the basics means safety messages with three layers: picture, simple text, and
then technical documents. (See page 11). However, here is a taste of three advanced
communication techniques.
1. Fear Appeals Fear appeals can change behavior and refineries are the perfect place to use them.
Fear appeals, however, require a balance: the amount of fear must equal the ease of the solution.
If you deliver a high fear-appeal message without an easy-to-do solution, people reduce the fear by
suppressing the message (”I don’t believe it“ ”never happen to me” “that’s exaggerated”).
This is why years of terrifying anti-smoking ads failed. Smokers (70% of whom had already tried
and failed to quit) did not see an easy solution–so they reduced their fear by suppressing the
message. For this same reason fear appeals are not used for losing weight.
On the other hand, fear appeals work well in car safety (seat belts), dental care (flossing), AIDS
(condoms) because you can reduce the fear by doing the relatively easy solution.
If what happened on your inside Refineries are perfect for fear appeals because there are plenty of reasons to be afraid and many
happened on your outside of the solutions are easy to do.
would you still smoke?
This ad did not work. Sources: Keller, Witte
A good communication campaign inserts your safety message into the collective:
Choose one topic relevant across the refinery: new permit system, evacuation procedures.
Logo: prepare something clever capturing the major theme of the campaign.
Big-bang launch flooding the refinery with: pins, coffee mugs, hats, and posters.
Knowledge booklet for everyone: 10 to 15 pages explaining the new safety procedures.
After one week, employees take a 20-question test on the material in the booklet.
Substitute teachers, usually from a specialist temp. agency, arrive at your refinery.
These teachers randomly select employees for testing, then administer and score the tests.
These teachers aggregate anonymous individual scores into a refinery score.
The refinery must reach 80% correct answers or a re-test is scheduled for the next week.
A well-executed communication campaign embeds your safety message into the entire refinery.
3. Improved Channel Your safety communication does not show a good understanding of communication
channels. Especially what each channel does best:
Selection
Web: best for searching–locating small pieces of information within large data sets.
Paper: best for comprehending–understanding new, long, and complicated ideas.
Face to face: best for overcoming employee resistance to change.
Web pages are not best for comprehension because the mind is busy juggling two
tasks: navigation and understanding. This is supported by research showing the more
links on a Web page, the lower the comprehension. Paper is superior to Web for
Web comprehension because there is no navigation, all mental resources can be devoted to
best for search Face to Face understanding.
best for change
Finally, mediated information (print and electronic) is good for creating awareness but
not best for behavior change. Face-to-face communication with a supervisor is about
ten times more powerful than mediated information for changing employee behavior.
Paper
Sources: Hailey, Larkin
best for comprehension
Aldridge, Michael D.: “Writing and Designing Readable Patient Education Materials,”
Nephrology Nursing Journal, vol. 31, no. 4, July/August 2004, p. 373-377.
Brownson, Kenneth: “Literacy: A Problem that Managers Must Handle,” Hospital Materiel
Management Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 1, August 1998, p. 37-47.
Chewning, Eugene G. Jr. and Adrian M. Harrell: “The Effect of Information Load on
Decision Makers’ Cue Utilization Levels and Decision Quality in a Financial Distress
Decision Task,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 15, no. 6, 1990, p. 527-542.
David, Prabu: "News Concreteness and Visual-Verbal Association: Do News Pictures Narrow
the Recall Gap Between Concrete and Abstract News?" Human Communication Research,
vol. 25, no. 2, December 1998, p. 180-201.
DuBay, William H.: “The Basics of Plain Language,” Impact Information: Plain Language
Services, Costa Mesa, CA, 2005, available online: http://www.impact-information.com.
Federal Public Service: Employment, Labour and Social Dialogue (UK): “Safety Alert:
Rupture of an (Atmospheric) Crude Oil Storage Tank,” Document No.: CRC/ONG/013-E,
Version: 1, November 2006 p. 1-12.
Hailey, David E. Jr. and Christine Hailey: “Hypermedia, Multimedia, and Reader Cognition:
An Empirical Study,” Technical Communication, Third Quarter, 1998, p. 330-342.
Houts, Peter S.; Cecilia C. Doak; Leonard G. Doak; Matthew J. Loscalzo: “The Role of
Pictures in Improving Health Communication: A Review of Research on Attention,
Comprehension, Recall, and Adherence,” Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 61, 2006,
p.173-190.
Keller, Punam A. and Lauren G. Block: "Increasing the Persuasiveness of Fear Appeals: The
Effect of Arousal and Elaboration," Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 22, no. 4, March
1996, p. 448-459.
Larkin, TJ and Sandar Larkin: “Communicating Big Change: Using Small Communication,”
Larkin Communication Consulting, 2006, available as a free download from:
www.Larkin.Biz.
Mayer, Richard E., William Bove, Alexandra Bryman, Rebecca Mars, and Lene Tapangco:
"When Less is More: Meaningful Learning From Visual and Verbal Summaries of Science
Textbook Lessons," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 88, no. 1, 1996, p. 64-73.
Montondon, Lucille G. and Treba L. Marsh: “How Readable are Those Financial Reports,”
The Journal of Government Financial Management, vol. 54, no. 1, Spring 2005, p. 52-56.
Seddon, Paul: Harness Suspension: Review and Evaluation of Existing Information, Contract
Research Report, 451/2002, Prepared for the Health and Safety Executive, 2002.
Witte, Kim and Mike Allen: "A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective
Public Health Campaigns," Health Education & Behavior, vol. 27, no. 5, October 2000, p.
591-615.