Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Building Employee Retention
Building Employee Retention
Building Employee Retention
A Crash Course
for Building
Employee
Retention
Building Employee
Retention in Your
Company
A Crash Course for Building Employee Retention 2
In the face of a growing talent shortage, few companies can afford 6 // The Talent War Ceasefire Is
to ignore strategies for employee retention. But how can we create Over (and What That Means
a magnetic and sticky culture that not only attracts candidates to to You)
us, but helps us hang on to the great talent we already have? We
need answers. A look at the current state of
employee retention and how you can
This collection of some of our most popular blog posts will offer prepare for the looming talent war.
you some constructive advice and actionable pointers on how you
can reduce voluntary turnover and build a culture of retention. 9 // Why Managers Fail To
Recognize Employee
Contributions
Leigh Branham, author of 7 Hidden
Reasons Employees Leave shares
strategies for helping managers
to be more successful in keeping
employees happy.
“Inconceivable!”
That’s one of my favorite lines from the classic
movie, The Princess Bride, and I have to admit it’s
been running through my mind a lot over the past
few weeks, as we’ve been trying to calculate the
astronomical cost of employee turnover.
The source of my astonishment was the Every way we sliced the numbers, even with
creation of an infographic for our new exceedingly conservative (i.e., ridiculously
paper that shows the incredible costs low) per-person costs resulted in a shocking
of turnover. (It’s called 5 Reasons You expense associated with high turnover. The
Need Strategic Recognition). One might totals dwarfed the cost of even the most
think that an infographic like this would robust recognition program. Programs
Even exceedingly conservative per-person be simple, but it turns out, as anyone that hit industry benchmarks and cost 2%
costs resulted in a shocking expense knows who has really tried to do it… the of payroll spend wouldn’t hold a candle to
associated with high turnover. The totals cost of turnover is not an easy number to how much employee turnover is costing
dwarfed the cost of even the most robust calculate. We spent literally hours talking companies. And when you consider
over the numbers and calculations to make that those programs can boost retention
recognition program.
sure that the end result would reflect up to 31%, the business case for
reality for our customers. recognition is astounding.
co n ti n u e d >
A Crash Course for Building Employee Retention 4
3 4 5
Here’s the final product:
Average Annual Cost to Replace Annual Loss of Talent
Salaries (@75% of salary) (@11% turnover)
1 2
Company with
10,000 Employees
Entry 770
people $17.3MM
Level $30K $22.5K
70%
Mid-
mgmt $52.5K
220
people
$11.6MM
$70K
20%
$41.3MM
in bottom line turnover costs
1 Company Size: Our customers tend to range in size from 1,000 to 350,000 employees, therefore we figured 10,000 employees was a reasonable number.
2 Breakdown: Since many companies seem to break down at a 70/20/10% level, in terms of manager/employee ratio, we thought this was a safe bet for our ACME Average Company.
3 A
verage Salaries: We had a look at the Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers and did some averaging and generalizing and arrived
at a conservative estimate of a $30/70/150K breakdown for salaries.
4 C
ost to Replace: Here’s where it starts to get more complex. In our paper we noted that SHRM has estimated the cost to replace an employee at $3,500, which was the lowest estimate of 17
organizations surveyed, but we agree with experts who suggest that the cost to replace really does vary by role. Still, the cost to replace even a minimum wage employee, when you factor in time lost,
training time, interviewing and advertising investment, etc. is significant. It goes up exponentially when an exhaustive talent search is needed. In the end the estimate we thought captured the most
nuance was a chart published by the Jack Phillips ROI Institute. To save over-complication we averaged the costs into a 75% of annual salary turnover cost.
5 Annual Turnover %: While the US Labor Bureau reports average turnover costs at 38%, we thought that was a little excessive for our example. In their recent study of workplace psychology,
the American Psychology Association estimated turnover at the very best companies to be 11%. We thought that most companies would find the high cost at even a low 11% to be illuminating, co n ti n u e d >
so we chose that number.
A Crash Course for Building Employee Retention 5
Then it was all over but the calculating. We When you do the numbers this way—
determined that if you had 10K employees substituting real metrics for our
@ those given annual salaries, with a estimates—for your company, even in
cost to replace at 75% of salary, at an 11% the most conservative manner possible, I
turnover rate, your annual loss would equal think you’ll be really surprised what talent
$X, and in this case $X is a whopping loss is costing you, even before you factor
$41.3 million. in the intangibles. When you consider
that strategic recognition can boost
If that number seems impossibly high, and those retention numbers dramatically,
your company has new recruits beating it’s amazing there are any companies out
down the doors so you spend little on re- there without programs. Yet according
cruitment, note that even if everyone in the to the latest Mood Tracker survey, 46%
company made entry level wages and cost of employees don’t feel they are being
only $3,500 to replace, the turnover would recognized effectively.
still run you $3 million annually. You can
see why I was blown away. I think somebody needs to send those
companies our infographic!
And that is just what we are seeing. In other According to a 2012 report by the McKinsey
words, if the economic recession offered Global Institute, employers will face a 13%
an armistice in the War for Talent— that shortage of highly skilled workers by 2020
ceasefire is rapidly coming to an end. –that is 38-40 million fewer skilled workers
than needed. In developing economies,
Of course, employment numbers are the shortage of educated workers could
Employees worry less for their job security, only a small part of the story. The War for be nearly 45 million workers. Conversely,
and top talent begins to poke out of the Talent is exactly that: a competition among we will see an 11% oversupply of unskilled
foxhole and look around for opportunities. employers for the most skilled talent workers around the globe. And according to
available. There’s a reason it isn’t called World at Work, at least 72% of companies
the War for Employees. That’s because worldwide have already admitted that
there is a growing shortage of highly- finding skilled workers is a major problem.
skilled workers, which is independent of
unemployment among less skilled workers.
co n ti n u e d >
A Crash Course for Building Employee Retention 7
This begs the question: “This begs the 1. Build Your HR Brand 2. Hire for the Right Fit
question: How can you ensure that you are Your company may have a great brand, but Just because the market is tough doesn’t
able to hire and then retain all the skilled do you have a great HR brand? Are people mean you should be desperate or lower
and qualified workers you need, in the attracted to your culture and dying to be your standards. Hiring people who fit
face of fierce competition? Well, it helps part of it? Maintaining an HR brand is more your culture means they’ll be both more
to consider what skilled employees are than simply tacking recruitment ads onto productive and more likely to stick around.
looking for:” your corporate brand. It is about projecting
a positive reputation and communicating 3. Magnetize and
• Competitive Base Salary Manage Your Culture
that image of your company to current
• Job Security employees and the prospective employee The single best thing you can do to retain
• Career Advancement & Growth pool. People have always been willing to eat top employees is to create a culture that
• A Convenient Work Location at McDonalds, and employee satisfaction they don’t want to leave. The top 100 Best
has always been high. But not many companies to work for see 3% or fewer
• Learning & Development
Opportunities people wanted to work at a place where of their employees leave voluntarily. Find
the term “McJob” was coined. When the ways to create a great culture that reflects
• Flexibility
company started to manage its HR brand, values that your employees can relate to.
• Great Company Culture it jumped to #8 on the list of the Best Then find ways to measure and manage
• Robust Benefits Multinational Companies to Work For. And that culture.
in 2011, when McDonald’s sought to hire
In light of that, here are some tactics you 62,000 new workers, more than 1 million
might employ in 2013 to differentiate your people applied. Neglect your HR brand at
company and attract the talent you need. your peril.
After 20 years of researching the drivers of Yet, sadly, about four out of every five • They believe they are too busy to
employee engagement, I have concluded employee contributions go unrecognized, take the time. This is usually a failure of
that the mother lode of motivation come according to at least one study. These the culture that has either overloaded their
from what I call the C-A-R Cycle management errors of omission are managers as doers rather than delegators
costly missed opportunities to pump or, has somehow communicated to
• Giving employees a Challenge
up engagement levels. So, it seems only managers that recognizing employees is
• Having them Achieve logical to try and understand why so many not an essential part of their job.
• Making sure they are managers fail to recognize. After reading
promptly Recognized more than 100,000 verbatim comments • They actually have the time, but
from surveys submitted in Best-Places- are not paying enough attention to the
to-Work competitions, I’ve identified 13 employee’s performance to notice the
reasons managers fall short when it comes contribution. Many managers are simply
to recognizing their people—each of which more task-focused than people-focused,
is understandable, but unacceptable: and have their heads down looking at
their to-do lists.
co n ti n u e d >
A Crash Course for Building Employee Retention 10
• They believe “if you don’t hear from • They are unsure about how best to • They are concerned that if they give
me, it means you’re doing a good job.” I’ve recognize, so they do nothing. This is easy special recognition to some, others will
personally heard this one from more than enough to understand; people tend not to feel unfairly overlooked. Employees usually
one manager. It’s an abdication of manager do things when they’re not exactly sure on know who deserves to be recognized and
responsibility in the guise of giving the how to do them. But this one is also the who doesn’t. The mistake some managers
employee autonomy. And managers easiest to correct—by training managers make is praising the team as a whole when
should bear in mind what the renowned in the basic principles and how-to’s of it was really one individual that carried the
psychologist William James once said: effective recognition. ball, or singling out one person when it
“The deepest principal in human nature is was a team accomplishment.
the craving to be appreciated.” • They never received much praise
or recognition themselves, so they • They harbor a fundamental
• They believe “employees shouldn’t aren’t inclined to give it to others. Again, disrespect for some types of work or
expect me to pat them on the back understandable but not excusable. In fact, workers. I once heard a manager say
all the time for just doing their jobs … many managers who practice recognition “A monkey could do that job.” I’ve also
their paycheck should be enough.” most effectively do so because they know noticed a tendency to devalue employees
This perspective is quite common and what it’s like not to be recognized. in support departments in companies that
reveals a basic misunderstanding of are otherwise sales-or expertise-driven.
human psychology. On the contrary, the • They believe employees will think This is clearly a massive mistake; all jobs
pats on the back should be reserved for they are phony and insincere if they and contributions are worthy of respect.
acknowledging extra effort, not “for just suddenly start praising them. It’s OK for a
doing their jobs.” manager to tell their direct reports they’ve
decided to start doling out praise when it’s
merited. The key is to notice and praise a
specific above-and-beyond contribution
and describe how much it meant to the
business, not just go around patting
people on the back and saying “you’re
doing a great job.”
co n ti n u e d >
A Crash Course for Building Employee Retention 11
• They believe employees know they’re • They don’t know enough about the I do not advocate giving more recognition
replaceable and shouldn’t expect to receive employees’ jobs to distinguish between than people deserve. Those whose
special treatment. This one is endemic to average and superior performance. expectation of recognition exceeds the
the current economy. Too many leaders are I’ve heard this one many times from value they bring should receive the strong
counting on a poor job market to motivate employees in describing their managers, dose of reality they need—in the form of
employee loyalty. Are we really motivated often in technical organizations. Managers direct, fact-based feedback.
by “You should feel lucky to have a job”? who can’t make distinctions between
average and superior performance Questions to consider: Which of the
• They don’t believe they should among their direct reports should not be above reasons, if any, do you believe
have to pay employees above market for managing them. are justifiable? Which do you believe
sustained high performance or provide present the biggest obstacles to employee
bonuses for special achievements. The fact There you have it—a baker’s dozen engagement? What should companies
is only about a third of employees believe reasons. Having presented and discussed do to address the beliefs inherent in
their pay is linked to their performance. these at length with hundreds of these reasons?
The best employers pay a premium for managers, I realize that many will remain
high performance. firm in their resistance to “giving too much Leigh Branham is Founder and Principal
recognition” to employees whom they see of Keeping the People, Inc., which helps
• They believe the employees they as “already too entitled,” or part of the companies analyze the root causes of
recognize will respond by asking for a raise. “trophy generation who got trophies for employee disengagement and turnover, then
Some employees will indeed ask for raises, just participating and expect more of the develop strategies for becoming better places
but that is a question that every manager same at work.” Yet, when I ask audiences to work. He is the author of The 7 Hidden
should expect and be prepared to discuss. of all ages “How many of you get too much Reasons Employees Leave and Re-Engage:
recognition?,” not a hand goes up–ever. How America’s Best Places to Work Inspire
Extra Effort in Extraordinary Times.
co n ti n u e d >
A Crash Course for Building Employee Retention 13
co n ti n u e d >
A Crash Course for Building Employee Retention 14