Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Прикази

Kathryn Blair Moore, The ish Mandate” by “stabilizing an image of the architecture
Architecture of the Christian of the Holy Sepulcher as a pure expression of medieval
Holy Land. Reception from Christianity” (p. 296). As accurately presented by Moore,
Late Antiquity through the Krautheimer’s seminal essay of 1942 on the “iconography
Renaissance. In English of medieval architecture”2 set several immensely impor-
tant precedents for how we continue to study architecture
Cambridge: Cambridge of the Holy Land. Krautheimer conceived architectural
University Press, 2017 iconography as a combination of images and texts in the
Cloth. Pp. xviii, 420; 223 studies of architecture and its meaning, and opened a
prolific trend in medieval architectural history in which
black-and-white figures and
forms of buildings may be related to their content, or sym-
32 color plates; bibliography;
bolic meanings. Yet, by insisting on exacting mechanical
index; list of abbreviations; reproduction and visual qualities of architecture, rather
ISBN 9781316488362 than including also spiritual, experiential, and intellectu-
ally active re-creation of religiously significant structures,
Kathryn Blair Moore is an expert of Medieval and Krautheimer’s concept of an architectural copy, also set
Renaissance art and architecture and teaches at Texas State subsequent studies of medieval architecture, in particular,
University, San Marcos. In her groundbreaking book, The in a somewhat negative framework. Krautheimer focused
Architecture of the Christian Holy Land, Moore examines the on the imprecision, inattentiveness to detail, and general
reception of the architecture of the Holy Land within broad inaccuracy of medieval “copies” of the Holy Sepulchre, ul-
religious and political contexts. By complementing excep- timately advocating that the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem
tionally rich textual, visual, archeological, and architectural was a very vague model, no more of one than any other
material about the Holy Land with extensive and impec- medieval building, for important European churches and
cable research on this topic, which she conducted in the baptisteries, hence reducing its significance to the level
Mediterranean, Western Asia, North Africa, Europe, and of a common idea. This critical assessment widely cited
the United States, Moore reveals how actual as well as spir- and used as a methodological tool for studying medi-
itual, intellectual, and virtual pilgrimages to the Holy Land eval architecture ultimately implied that there was a lack
constitute critical mechanisms in the continual contestation, of architects and “true” architecture in the medieval pe-
recreation, and restoration of the Christian Holy Land. riod, which Krautheimer sharply contrasted with the per-
ceived fidelity and accuracy of Renaissance and modern
Moore masterfully demonstrates her major hypoth-
architectural practices. Moore starts from Krautheimer’s
esis that since the fourth century, in the absence of the
macro-context of medieval Christianity and expands into
palpable bodies of Christ and Mary as major figures of detailed and sophisticatedly contextualized case studies,
Christian belief, monumental buildings came to shape the elaborating upon the potentials of architectural iconogra-
sacred topography of the Holy Land and Christian land- phy. In contrast to Krautheimer, however, she highlights
scape that expanded well beyond the physical confines of the role of relics, theology, and affective piety in medieval
the seminal sites associated with the life of Christ, Mary, perception and reception of the architecture in the Holy
and the first Christians. The singular importance of the Land as the embodiment of the active divine presence,
Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem or the Church of the Nativity often abstracted from phenomenal experience and enter-
in Bethlehem cannot be overstated. Yet, instead of writ- ing into cultural memory. Architecture and its material-
ing a traditional, linear history of the lives of these and ity were vital in such an experience and reception of the
other Christian buildings of the Holy Land,1 Moore sets Holy Land. She also sees the ongoing antagonisms be-
these buildings in a religiously and politically charged dy- tween Christianity and Islam as well as between opposing
namic space. She defines this dynamic space by what she Protestant and Catholic understandings of the religious
calls “the generative capacity of language,” (p. xv) imagery, significance and political meanings of the Holy Sepulchre
and actions of appropriation, recreation, and destruction, and related buildings in the Holy Land, including their re-
which characterize the relationships among Judaism, Ro- creations elsewhere, as a sign of continuity and cohesion
man paganism, Catholic and Protestant Christianity, and from the past to present, rather than discontinuity and
various factions of Islam. At the same time, Moore argues incoherency. Moreover, actual architectural accomplish-
that such a dynamic framework impacts both the physical ments and their reception studied across numerous exam-
reality and reception of the actual buildings and sites in ples, geographies, and time spans, reveal that the definite
the Holy Land (p. xv). This innovative approach is bold and discrete divisions between late antique and medieval
from renaissance and modern periods are rather academ-
and highly sophisticated as it follows the significance
ic constructs, further reinforcing the divide by specializa-
and meaning of the architecture in the Holy Land within
tions within the studies of architecture of the Holy Land.
changing religious and political dynamics.
The expansive chronological and geographical ho-
In her engaging book, Moore successfully elaborates
rizons and her expert command of numerous textual and
and shakes the dominant Anglo-Saxon scholarship on the
architecture of the Holy Land as pioneered by Richard visual sources allow Moore to point to pivotal moments
Krautheimer, whose “rehabilitation of the image of Chris- in the European reception of the architecture of the Holy
tian Jerusalem [was] undertaken in the years of the Brit- Land. She starts with the architectural articulation of the
Holy Land under Emperor Constantine in the fourth cen-
1 See, for example, invaluable books such as Denys Pringle, The
Churches of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem: A Corpus [New York: 2 Richard Krautheimer, Introduction to an Iconography of
Cambridge University Press, 1993–2009) or Martin Biddle, The Tomb Medieval Architecture, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes
of Christ (Stroud, UK: Sutton Publishing, 2000 (1999)]. 5 (1942) 1–33. 233
ЗОГРАФ 41 (2017) [227–248]

tury and then studies in great detail the consequences of tions that staged the Holy Land as a Christian posses-
the First Crusade, the emergence of the Franciscan Cus- sion” (p. 297). She successfully presents equally important
tody of the Holy Land, and the anti-Islamic crusade move- verbal descriptions, pilgrimage guides, and other textual
ments of the Renaissance. Following the introduction (pp. and culturally defined media that recurrently preceded an
1–19), these critical periods constitute four major parts of actual pilgrimage and experience of the Holy Land. The
the book: “The Symbolization of Holy Land Architecture” most recent developments in the digital humanities seem-
(pp. 21–62); “Triumphal Restoration and Re-Creation in ingly follow the same mechanisms and tensions between
the Crusades” (pp. 63–116); “The Franciscan Custody of the imaginary and real. Hence, in the virtual realms of
the Holy Land” (pp. 117–167); and “Imagined Pilgrimages cyberspace, Franciscans continue their tradition of re-cre-
and Crusades in the Renaissance” (pp. 169–284). Each sec- ating an imagined experience of the Holy Land through
tion of the book is internally subdivided into four shorter virtual tours crafted to embody the experience of moving
thematic chapters, with brief introductions and conclu- through the Christian buildings and sites, memorializing
sions. Such an organization of the material allows the read- the movement of Christ and his followers, while at the
er either to read the book chronologically or to contemplate same time mediating these experiences through believ-
each part individually and in an order that follows personal ably reconstructed buildings that “together construct an
interests within this huge topic of Holy Land architecture. apparently continuous Catholic territory” (p. 297). On the
Along with an impressive bibliography, the rich and dili- extreme opposite, as Moore successfully demonstrates,
gently analyzed material in each chapter constitutes a treas- evangelical Christian virtual reconstructions often appro-
ure trove of information for further studies. priate the Jewish past and eradicate the Islamic present,
Even if only highlighted in the epilogue (pp. 285– while the conceptualization of cyberspace as egalitarian
298), the Protestant Reformation and related, more re- and homogenous, free of any embodied information and
cent events in the last two centuries are especially impor- perception, paradoxically adheres to the Protestant long-
tant for the historiography and scholarship on the topic. ing for an empirically verifiable Holy Land.
Moore juxtaposes the Jesuit missions in the Americas and Brilliantly researched and intelligently presented,
Protestant activities that persistently question the verac- elegantly written and generously illustrated with many
ity, historicity, and sacred status of the sites in the Holy photographs done by the author herself, The Architec-
Land. By refocusing interest from specific buildings and ture of the Christian Holy Land is a superb contribution
embodied experience of the faithful to the broader and to the growing studies of sacred space and religious ar-
less palpable natural landscape of the Holy Land exam- chitecture. Moore’s book examines sacred architecture
ined through presumably objective scientific geography, in the Holy Land not only from a historical perspective
as well as exacting textual and linguistic analysis of se- but also ingeniously points to the opposing but pervasive
lected references from either the Bible or ancient history, mechanisms of their reception that continue up to pre-
the scholarship within the Protestant idioms customarily sent. Highly recommended for advanced students and in-
dismisses medieval sources as implausible and simulta- terdisciplinary scholars of sacred architecture, this excel-
neously implies objective realism of the Renaissance and lent book should also command the attention of anyone
modern representations of the religious architecture in the interested in “the potential for architecture to shape the
Holy Land. Moore explains that paintings, prints, photo- experience of divine presence” (p. 284).
graphs, or architectural recreations of the architecture of
Jelena Bogdanović, Iowa State University
the Holy Land “often depended on previous representa-

234

You might also like