Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Personal Hygiene * Tinea

110 100,0% 0 0,0% 110 100,0%
Kruris

Personal Hygiene * Tinea Kruris Crosstabulation

Tinea Kruris

Negatif Tinea Positif Tinea

Kruris Kruris Total

Personal Hygiene Buruk Count 25 14 39

% within Personal Hygiene 64,1% 35,9% 100,0%

% within Tinea Kruris 26,3% 93,3% 35,5%

% of Total 22,7% 12,7% 35,5%

Baik Count 70 1 71

% within Personal Hygiene 98,6% 1,4% 100,0%

% within Tinea Kruris 73,7% 6,7% 64,5%

% of Total 63,6% 0,9% 64,5%

Total Count 95 15 110

% within Personal Hygiene 86,4% 13,6% 100,0%

% within Tinea Kruris 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 86,4% 13,6% 100,0%

 Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value Df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 25,425a 1 ,000

Continuity Correctionb 22,581 1 ,000
Likelihood Ratio 26,196 1 ,000
Fisher's Exact Test ,000 ,000
Linear-by-Linear Association 25,194 1 ,000
N of Valid Cases 110

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,32.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Personal

,026 ,003 ,204
Hygiene (Buruk / Baik)
For cohort Tinea Kruris =
,650 ,513 ,824
Negatif Tinea Kruris
For cohort Tinea Kruris =
25,487 3,481 186,600
Positif Tinea Kruris
N of Valid Cases 110