The Act of State Doctrine instructs courts to apply the law of a foreign state to acts made by that foreign government within its own territory. To invoke the doctrine, it must be shown that a foreign state acted and that the events took place in the foreign state's territory, with a presumption that the act was legal there. The doctrine emerged from both international reasons like comity between states, and domestic reasons involving the separation of powers between the U.S. judiciary and other branches.
The Act of State Doctrine instructs courts to apply the law of a foreign state to acts made by that foreign government within its own territory. To invoke the doctrine, it must be shown that a foreign state acted and that the events took place in the foreign state's territory, with a presumption that the act was legal there. The doctrine emerged from both international reasons like comity between states, and domestic reasons involving the separation of powers between the U.S. judiciary and other branches.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The Act of State Doctrine instructs courts to apply the law of a foreign state to acts made by that foreign government within its own territory. To invoke the doctrine, it must be shown that a foreign state acted and that the events took place in the foreign state's territory, with a presumption that the act was legal there. The doctrine emerged from both international reasons like comity between states, and domestic reasons involving the separation of powers between the U.S. judiciary and other branches.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
○ Serves as a principle of choice of law, instructing a court to apply the law of a foreign state respecting an act made by the foreign govt in its own territory. § Doesn’t have notion of comity; does not provide jurisdictional immunity ○ To invoke the act of state doctrine you have to show 2 things? § A foreign state was acting § That the events took place in the foreign state § Also a presumption that it was legal in the foreign state ○ How did this emerge? § Int'l reason - like comity; if state is acting within their own laws, we should respect that § Domestic - U.S. can still advocate on behalf of its own citizens, but b/c there's a separation of power, judiciary branch shouldn’t deal with this, but the other 2 branches should