TUGAS 2

SI-5161 MANAJEMEN INFRASTRUKTUR

DOSEN PENGASUH :
IR. REINI D. WIRAHADIKUSUMAH, PH.D.

DISUSUN OLEH:

NAMA : Rr. Nur Ratri P.D

NIM : 25015040

FAKULTAS TEKNIK SIPIL DAN LINGKUNGAN

PROGRAM MAGISTER TEKNIK SIPIL
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG
2015
 The case represents that there are two alternative project strategies and LCCA is needed to make a
deterministic approach because each alternative have the same level of performance or benefit. The
discount rate is 4 percent and a 35-year analysis period is used.

Here is the expenditure stream diagram, showing activities, costs, and timing based on the determine
activity timing :

Alternative A,

Initial Rehabilitation 1 RSL

Construction (20-year service life) (if applicable)

$ 30 billion
$ 11 billion

$ 26 billion
$ 15 billion

0 12 35
20 28
$ 3.75 billion

$ 7.5 billion
Alternative B,

Initial Rehabilitation 1 Rehabilitation 2 Rehabilitation 3 RSL

Construction (8-year service life) (8-year service life) (8-year service life) (if applicable)

$ 28 biillion
$ 8 biillion

$ 10 biillion

$ 20 biillion
$ 6 biillion $ 6biillion
$ 16 biillion $ 6 biillion

0 12 20 28 35

$0.75billion
Note :
$37.5 billion
= agency costs

= user costs
Moreover, we can represents the line chart above in this table,

Table 1. Estimate Cost (Agency and User)

Atlernative A Activities Alternative B Activities

Year Constant Dollar Constant Dollar Constant Dollar Constant Dollar
Agency Costs User Costs Agency Costs Costs
0 $26,000,000 $11,000,000 $20,000,000 $8,000,000
12 $6,000,000 $10,000,000
20 $15,000,000 $30,000,000 $6,000,000 $16,000,000
28 $6,000,000 $28,000,000
35 $(3,750,000) $(7,500,000) $(750,000) $(3,500,000)

Then the PV (present value) is calculated for each of the agency and user costs by using this formula,

1
𝑃𝑉 = 𝐹𝑉 ×
(1 + 𝑟)

And to obtained the discount factor (DF) for each year we can use this formula,

1
𝐷𝐹 =
(1 + 𝑟)

So that,

𝑃𝑉 = 𝐹𝑉 × 𝐷𝐹

Constant Agency Cost on 20-year = $15,000,000 (FV) and the discount rate is 4 percent,

1
𝐷𝐹 =
(1 + 𝑟)

𝐷𝐹 = = 0.4564 ,
( . )

Then,

𝑃𝑉 = $15,000,000 × 0.4564

𝑃𝑉 = $6,845,804

It also applied to all costs that are expenditured after 0-year.

So we can make it on this table,

Table 2. Compute Life-Cycle Costs

Atlernative A Activities Alternative B Activities

Constant Constant Constant
Discount Factor Constant
Year Dollar Agency Dollar User Dollar Agency
Dollar Costs
Costs Costs Costs
0 1.000 $26,000,000 $11,000,000 $20,000,000 $8,000,000
12 0.6246 $3,747,582 $6,245,970
20 0.4564 $6,845,804 $13,691,608 $2,738,322 $7.302,191
28 0.3335 $2,000,865 $9,337,369
35 0.2534 $(905,308) $(1,900,616) $(190,062) $(886,954)
Total Costs (PV) $31,895,496 $22,790,992 $28,296,707 $29,998,576

Based on the table above, we can analyze that Alternative B has the higher combined agency and user
cost than Alternative A.