Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sae Technical Paper Series: Takao Yokoyama, Yoshiyuki Hayashi, Katsuyuki Osako and Yoshimi Komatsu
Sae Technical Paper Series: Takao Yokoyama, Yoshiyuki Hayashi, Katsuyuki Osako and Yoshimi Komatsu
Sae Technical Paper Series: Takao Yokoyama, Yoshiyuki Hayashi, Katsuyuki Osako and Yoshimi Komatsu
SAE TECHNICAL
PAPER SERIES
Reprinted From: CI and SI Power Cylinder Systems and Power Boost Technology
(SP-1964)
400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001 U.S.A. Tel: (724) 776-4841 Fax: (724) 776-5760 Web: www.sae.org
The Engineering Meetings Board has approved this paper for publication. It has successfully completed
SAE’s peer review process under the supervision of the session organizer. This process requires a
minimum of three (3) reviews by industry experts.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise,
without the prior written permission of SAE.
SAE Permissions
400 Commonwealth Drive
Warrendale, PA 15096-0001-USA
Email: permissions@sae.org
Tel: 724-772-4028
Fax: 724-772-4891
ISSN 0148-7191
Copyright © 2005 SAE International
Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of SAE.
The author is solely responsible for the content of the paper. A process is available by which discussions
will be printed with the paper if it is published in SAE Transactions.
Persons wishing to submit papers to be considered for presentation or publication by SAE should send the
manuscript or a 300 word abstract to Secretary, Engineering Meetings Board, SAE.
Printed in USA
2005-01-1855
Measurement [Hz]
㪥㪸㫋㫌㫉㪸㫃㩷㪽㫉㪼㫈㫌㪼㫅㪺㫐㩷㩿㪤㪼㪸㫊㫌㫉㪼㪻㩷㪀㩷㪲㪟㫑㪴
㪈㪋㪇㪇㪇
㪈㫊㫋
㪉㫅㪻
㪈㪉㪇㪇㪇
㪊㫉㪻
㪋㫋㪿
㪈㪇㪇㪇㪇
㪌㫋㪿
㪍㫋㪿
㪏㪇㪇㪇 㪎㫋㪿
㪏㫋㪿
㪍㪇㪇㪇 ♽㪋
㪋㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪇㪇㪇
㪇
㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪇 㪋㪇㪇㪇 㪍㪇㪇㪇 㪏㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪇㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪉㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪋㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪍㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪏㪇㪇㪇
Simulation [Hz]
㪥㪸㫋㫌㫉㪸㫃㩷㪽㫉㪼㫈㫌㪼㫅㪺㫐㩷㩿㪝㪜㪤㪀㩷㪲㪟㫑㪴
㪈㪉㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪈㪇㪇㪇
㪌 㫋㪿 㩿㪍 㪥 㪛 㪀
[Hz]
㪈㪇㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪌㪟
㪐㪇㪇㪇 㪋 㫋㪿
Frequency
ᝄേᢙ㪲㪟㫑㪴
㪏㪇㪇㪇
㪊 㫉㪻 㩿 㪍 㪥 㪛 㪀
㪎㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪇㪟
㪍㪇㪇㪇
㪉㫅㪻
㪌㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪇㪇㪇
㪈㫊㫋
㪌㪟
㪊㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪇㪇㪇
㪇
㪇 㪌㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪇㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪌㪇㪇㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪇㪇 㪉㪌㪇㪇㪇 㪊㪇㪇㪇㪇 㪊㪌㪇㪇㪇 㪋㪇㪇㪇㪇
Rotational
䉨
speed
࿁ ォ ᢙ 㪲 㫉㫇 㫄 㪴
䊔
[rpm]
✢ ࿑ 㩿㕒 ᱛ ᤨ ታ ᷹ 㪀 Fig.5 Relative stress
Fig.2 Campbell diagram (no rotating) (Blade 5th mode, Disk nodal 6(no-rotating))
㪈㪅㪇
MEASUREMENT RESULTS
㪇㪅㪐
㪇㪅㪏
The results for the blade 2nd mode with maximum
ᱜⷙൻ䈚䈢⋧ኻᔕജ䈱ᦨᄢ୯
㪇㪅㪎
nozzle angle, as indicated in Fig. 9, show that the disc
㪪㫋㫉㪼㫊㫊㩷
㪇㪅㪍
coupled vibration mode has an influence on the
㪇㪅㪌
measured stress. Given that the relationship between
㪇㪅㪋
the blade geometrical arrangement and the disc mode
㪇㪅㪊
arrangement changed over the course of two
measurements. No.6 blade has maximum stress at 1st
㪇㪅㪉
㪇㪅㪈
measurement, but No.2 blade has maximum stress at
2nd measurement. This means that a shift of disc
㪇㪅㪇
㪇 㪈 㪉 㪊 㪋 㪌 㪍 㪎 㪏 㪐 㪈㪇 㪈㪈 㪈㪉 㪈㪊 㪈㪋 㪈㪌
㪙㫃㪸㪻㪼㩷㪥㫆㪅㩷
⠢⇟ภ
vibratory mode arrangement occurred during the
Fig.6 Relative stress with disk coupling measurements. In light of this possibility that the disc
measurement test.㩷㩷 coupled vibration mode is rearranged with each
measurement, the necessity for simultaneous
measurement at multiple points becomes apparent. It
MEASUREMENT
should be noted, however, that there were cases in
which rearrangement did not occur, such as in the 3rd
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
mode.
Vibration stress measurements were carried out for the
Fig. 10(a) presents the changes in stress with vibration
above-noted radial turbine. Blade strain was measured
mode. As a general trend, vibration stress increases
using a sprayed strain gauge so as to withstand high
with the mode number for the blade. This indicates that
temperatures and the high centrifugal field. We
stresses corresponding to turbine load. Looking at
estimated the stress from measured strain. In this paper,
changes in stress with nozzle angle, as indicated in Fig.
the stresses were normalized by a reference value. In
10(b), reduced nozzle angle leads to higher vibration
considering the case of ND=6 disc coupling, it is
stress in 4th and 5th modes, and substantial influence is
necessary to simultaneously measure blade stress for
considered to be sustained from the nozzle wake. On
four blades. Accordingly, a four point simultaneous
telemeter system with an induction power supply was
utilized for measurement, with the gauge attachment 1 4
positions as indicated in Fig. 7. In order to facilitate 8
accurate measurement of the stress generated in the 䌎䌯.4
vibration modes being observed, the attachment
positions were determined from the results of analysis Splayed
and scanning measurement. Strain gauge signals were strain gage No.1
transmitted via a lead through a hole along the rotational
axis, connected to a non-contact transmitter (Fig. 8) on
the low-temperature compressor side.
OPERATING METHOD
No.8
The turbine was driven by compressed air at
temperature of 420K. In the case of a VG turbo, the No.11
nozzle angle is variable and vibration differs according to
the nozzle angle. The VG nozzle angle was given three Fig.7 Measured blades and gage positions
settings in terms of the nozzle o/p angle: 9.3, 12.3, and
18.2 degrees. Vibration stress was measured at the
resonance points between 1st and 5th modes extant in
the operating range.
Vibratory Stress䇭[-]
2.5 9.3
Stress
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
㪇 㪈 㪉 㪊 㪋 㪌 㪍 㪎 㪏 㪐 㪈㪇 㪈㪈 㪈㪉 㪈㪊 㪈㪋 㪈㪌 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
Blade No. Mode
(a) Vibratory mode difference
(a) First measurement Blade vibratory mode
4.0
1st
3.5 2nd
3.0 3rd
Vibratory stress䇭[-]
2.5 4th
5th
Stress
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
㪇 㪈 㪉 㪊 㪋 㪌 㪍 㪎 㪏 㪐 㪈㪇 㪈㪈 㪈㪉 㪈㪊 㪈㪋 㪈㪌 Max 18.2 12.3 9.3
Blade No. Nozzle vane angle [deg]
(b) Second measurement (b) Nozzle vane angle difference
Fig.9 Prediction of disk vibration mode Fig.10 Measurement result of Blade
vibratory stress
the other hand, while the stress values are high for the was set three times of blade axis length to stabilize the
unreduced maximum nozzle angle, this is due to the fact calculations.
that the nozzle trailing edge and the blade approach
each other and the wake diffusion distance becomes Because nozzle wake diffusion depends substantially on
shorter when the nozzle has a wide angle. the grid, identical topology was used for each nozzle
angle to reduce grid influence. Also, the density of the
BLADE ANALYSIS time series analysis data used for vibration analysis was
set at 30 points per pitch.
EXCITATION FORCE ANALYSIS
FLOW FORCE COMPARISON
Unsteady numerical simulation of internal flow of nozzles
and blades was conducted, and excitation force was The blade inlet flow force ( U Wu Cr), calculated from the
calculated from the static pressure distribution on the
flow analysis results, is shown in Fig. 11. The time-
blade surface [7]. In order to reduce simulation cost, the
averaged value of fluctuation and the amplitude were
analysis domain was not whole of turbine. A total of five
calculated from the time series data. From Fig. 11(a), it
cases were analyzed for nozzle angle, so as to verify the
can be seen that the average value increases as the
stress estimation accuracy with respect to the blade
blade vibration mode becomes higher. This is due to the
vibration mode. The analysis domain was set for three
fact that rotational speed increases with higher modes,
nozzle pitches and two blade pitches in order to make
and the blade load becomes greater. In lower modes,
the width of analysis closer together. Also, so as to avoid
the fact that the value of the suction surface is inverted
the influence of the cyclic boundaries, the vibration
is because the flow at the blade inlet tends toward the
analysis data was assembled from the center of the flow
pressure surface, and in this case it can be observed
path.
that the mode of excitation differs from other modes.
Also, from Figs. 11(b) and (c), the amplitude increases
In the conditions used for the present analysis, the as the mode becomes higher, and it was found that the
rotational component at the outlet is large due to the absolute value of the amplitude increases roughly
high U/C0. Problems such as reverse flow occur when exponentially.
rotation largely remains through the outlet boundary,
making the calculations unstable. The outlet boundary
Fig. 12 indicates the results for varied nozzle angle in pressure distribution on the blade surface. The
blade 3rd mode. When the angle is small, the flow force amplitude recedes from the leading edge towards the
of the suction surface reverses, and the absolute value trailing edge, indicating that the leading edge side is
increases. As with the case of lower modes as noted strongly excited. Also, given that the amplitude first
above, the cause of this is the tendency of the flow recedes but then increases in the vicinity of 1/3 of the
towards the pressure surface side. Thus, when the flow direction from the inlet, it is considered that the
nozzle angle is small, only the suction surface side is pressure fluctuation has a nodal in the direction of flow.
strongly excited. Because the canceling force from the
opposite direction is weak when only one side is excited, ANALYSIS RESULTS
the excitation force is considered to increase. The
results obtained from flow analysis (Large fluctuation of Fig. 14 shows a comparison of simulated stress V x
flow force in high mode, Large fluctuation of flow force with measurement. Good results are obtained for blade
with a small nozzle angle) were found to agree with the 3rd mode and a nozzle angle of 12.3 degrees, with error
stress tendencies as actually measured. Vibration of 4.3%. However, the error became quite large at
analysis is conducted from the flow analysis results, with 83.6% for 5th mode and an angle of 12.3 degrees. Fig.
quantitative evaluation. 14 has also a comparison of V mises, for a nozzle angle
of 12.3 degrees. The simulated stress of 5th mode is
Fig. 13 presents the nozzle wake frequency composition near V mises of measurement. As the stress direction on
amplitude and phase differential as derived from the the blade surface became complex in the 5th mode, it is
㪍㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪍㪇㪇㪇 Pres. Pres.
㪋㪇㪇㪇
Average䇭[N/m2]
Mid. Mid.
Average [N/m2]
㪈㪉㪇㪇㪇
Suc. 㪉㪇㪇㪇 Suc.
㪏㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪇㪇㪇 㪇
㪇 㪄㪉㪇㪇㪇
㪄㪋㪇㪇㪇 㪄㪋㪇㪇㪇
㪇 㪈 㪉 㪊 㪋 㪌 㪍 㪍 㪏 㪈㪇 㪈㪉 㪈㪋 㪈㪍
Mode Nozzle vane angle䇭[deg]
(a) Time average (a) Time average
㪇㪅㪊㪇 㪇㪅㪌㪇
Pres. 㪧㫉㪼㫊㪅
㪇㪅㪉㪌 㪇㪅㪋㪇 㪤㫀㪻㪅
Mid.
Amplitude [-]
Amplitude [-]
㪇㪅㪇㪇 㪇㪅㪇㪇
㪇 㪈 㪉 㪊 㪋 㪌 㪍 㪍 㪏 㪈㪇 㪈㪉 㪈㪋 㪈㪍
㪤㫆㪻㪼 Nozzle vane angle䇭[deg]
(b) Relative amplitude
DRelativeCORNKVWFG
㪈㪋㪇㪇 㪈㪍㪇
Pres. Pres.
㪈㪉㪇㪇
Mid. Mid.
Amplitude [N/m2]
Amplitude[N/m2]
㪈㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪉㪇
Suc. Suc.
㪏㪇㪇
㪏㪇
㪍㪇㪇
㪋㪇㪇
㪋㪇
㪉㪇㪇
㪇 㪇
㪇 㪈 㪉 㪊 㪋 㪌 㪍 㪍 㪏 㪈㪇 㪈㪉 㪈㪋 㪈㪍
㪤㫆㪻㪼 Nozzle vane angle䇭 [deg]
(c) Amplitude (c) Amplitude
Fig.11 Numerical simulation results Fig.12 Numerical simulation results
with mode difference with nozzle vane angle difference
Shroud Shroud
Amplitude[Pa]
Phase [deg]