Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Determination of DYNAMIC Young's Modulus of Concrete at Early Ages by Impact Resonance Test
Determination of DYNAMIC Young's Modulus of Concrete at Early Ages by Impact Resonance Test
t
pp. 11~18 L StructuralEngineering ]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o.
Abstract
-12 K S C E J o u r n a l of Civil E n g i n e e r i n g
Determination of dynamic young's modulus of concrete at early ages by impact resonance test
m i n e d from t h e r e s o n a n t f r e q u e n c y os
Supp?a (Acccler~v:ter)
--
Fr=m=
Transducer
t h e specimen in t h e first mode. Fig. 1
(b) shows a typical f r e q u e n c y - d o m a i n
r e c o r d for t h e u n c o n s t r a i n e d compres-
la~tror~en~
Hammer
sion wave (Kim et al. 1997). T h e
u n c o n s t r a i n e d compression wave veloci-
ty, ~o, of the s p e c i m e n is calculated
from:
v c = f~. ~ (1)
w h e r e fl is t h e first mode r e s o n a n c e
f r e q u e n c y and A is t h e wave l e n g t h of
DyrJamirAnilyzer
Signal
first mode (2 x s p e c i m e n length). Once
t h e u n c o n s t r a i n e d wave velocity is
(a) Schematic diagram of impact resonance test d e t e r m i n e d , the Young's m o d u l u s is
given by
0.04 -
E= p , 2 (2)
c
0.03 -- f l : 8.32 KHz
w h e r e r is the bulk d e n s i t y of t h e
0.02
E specimen.
0.01 It is i m p o r t a n t to n o t e t h a t one
a t t e m p t s to m e a s u r e the u n c o n s t r a i n e d
O.CO
I I I ' I compression velocity (,~) in the IR t e s t
5000 1C(~0 15000 200~
Frequency (Hz) while in the pulse velocity m e a s u r e -
m e n t one m e a s u r e s t h e c o n s t r a i n e d
(b) Typical frequency domain result compression wave velocity (,p), which
is controlled by the c o n s t r a i n e d mo-
dulus, M. The r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n M
Fig. 1. Dynamic Young's Modulus Test Setup a n d E is d e t e r m i n e d as follows, once
t h e Poisson's ratio, u, is obtained:
in t h e specimen. Piezoelectric accet-
e r o m e t e r s (PCB Model 303A12) which 1- u (3)
M = (1+ u) (1-2 u)
can o p e r a t e reliably over wide ampli-
tude a n d f r e q u e n c y ranges, a r e used to 3. Experimental Work
m o n i t o r the response of t h e specimen.
T h e o u t p u t signals from t h e accelerom- E x p e r i m e n t a l work was focused on
eters and i n s t r u m e n t e d h a m m e r are t h e e v a l u a t i o n of t h e d y n a m i c Y o u n ~ s
conditioned and t h e n recorded w i t h a m o d u l u s of concrete at early age using
waveform analyze,'. T h e w a v e f o r m an- t h e i m p a c t r e s o n a n c e method. In this
alyzer has t h e capacity to p e r f o r m d a t a w o r k t h r e e m a i n p a r a m e t e r s were
acquisition a n d signal processing. T h e selected, namely: (1) concrete type -
schematic d i a g r a m of IR s e t u p is shown t h r e e different compressive s t r e n g t h s ,
in Fig. 1. (2) c u r i n g condition w e t a n d air
The Young's modulus, E, is deter- curing, and (3) c u r i n g age - 6 h o u r s to
surface w a s s m o o t h e r t h a n t h a t of p r e s s i v e s t r e n g t h at 7 d a y s w a s a b o u t
c r u s h e d rocks, r e s u l t i n g in w e a k e r 80% o f t h e 2 8 - d a y s t r e n g t h , w h i c h is
aggregate-paste bond strength. The corn- typical for s i l i c a - f u m e concrete.
'7. : , |; T
o
i t! rg
11
r 1
/1/ = t ~J
iJ F -,t r
\/ "
!
c~
IL
2. K; ''I
e~
,
o
V
c=
cl
j
\
t
o
o 20.00
0.00 10.00 10.00
Frlq~g~Cy IIkH2) Frequency (kl-lz)
Fig. 2, Typical Frequency Domain Results Obtained from Specimens Cured in Wet Condition
' ! illi
t iiiiii i~III......iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii(
~0 ..... J....... ..... !......i~
iiii(iiill
ttl
g r = ! oc:
I,-
r162 40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ~ . . . . . . . .
IIJ
>
r, gl
gl
IAI
I I II O
~ 1D 84 O
~ ! i l!ll o
....... i ...... i ............. ~ j J ~ r
i
3200 36o0 4ooo
o i ,~ r
44O0
VELOCITY (m/s)
TIME (hr)
(a) V e l o c i t y vs. C o m p r e s s i v e s t r e n g t h
(a) A i r C u r i n g 80 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N
~ 40
lqllPfi
#
~ !Jil f.L 20 . . . . 9 . . . . : . . . . . ..~; ,.~.;...: . , . .:
o 11i!!i
IQ
0
24
r
DYNAMIC
28
~
YOUNG'S
i
~.
" j
~(&
MODULUS
t I
40
(GPa)
I
44
18- K S C E J o u r n a l of Civil E n g i n e e r i n g