Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 42

Comparing Utility

Interconnection Timelines for


Small-Scale Solar PV
Chelsea Barnes – EQ Research, LLC
Solar Focus | Washington, D.C. | Nov. 17, 2015
eq-research.com
The Problem: Waiting for Permission to Operate

• Delays are costly:


• Contribute to high soft costs
• $73.48/month for residential
5 kW system in Maryland
• Customer satisfaction
• Word-of-mouth marketing

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


A Growing Problem

Residential Solar Growth

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Study: Comparing Utility Interconnection Timelines

D.C.

20 installers
13 states and Washington DC
30,088 applications in 2013 (33 utility territories)
57,482 applications in 2014 (34 utility territories)

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Quantifying the Problem: PTO Wait Time
140

120

100

80
# of Days

Median
Lowest Reported
60
Highest Reported

40

20

0
2013 2014

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Quantifying the Problem 2013-2014

2013  2014 2013  2014 2013  2014


68% increase 75% utilities 18% utilities
on average increased decreased PTO
PTO

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Difference in Average PTO from 2013-2014

55

45

35
Number of Days

25

15

-5

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


The Good….

Average # of Days
0 5 10 15 20

CL&P (CT)

National Grid (MA) 2013


2014
JCP&L (NJ)

Central Hudson (NY)

National Grid (NY)

NYSEG (NY)

PG&E (CA)

BGE (MD)

MECO (HI)

PacifiCorp (UT)

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


…and the Rest
Average # of Days
0 15 30 45 60 75

ORU (NY)
2013
PSE&G (NJ)
SDG&E (CA)
2014
SRP (AZ)
TEP (AZ)
NV Power (NV)
SCE (CA)
MID (CA)
NSTAR (MA)
PGE (OR)
Con Ed (NY)
SMUD (CA)
ACE (NJ)
Delmarva (DE)
HECO (HI)
LIPA (NY)
HELCO (HI)
APS (AZ)
PacifiCorp (OR)
WMECO (MA)
Xcel (CO)
LADWP (CA)
Pepco (DC)
Pepco (MD)

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Policy Problems

• 24 of 34 utilities subject to regulated PTO timelines


• 14 out of 24 did not meet those deadlines
• Arizona, Delaware, DC, Maryland – no PTO deadlines
• Policies vary widely
• 5-30 business days
• On-site utility inspection/testing may or may not be
required
• MA only state with penalties for failure to meet PTO
deadlines
• Dispute resolution procedures unavailable or unused

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Problem Areas: Applications

• Paper process it
outdated

• Pre- and post-


construction
approval
unnecessary

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Problem Areas: Communication and Transparency

• Online application system solutions


• Staffing
• Coordination with local jurisdictions

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Preparing for More DG

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Recent Developments

D.C.

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Thank you!
Chelsea Barnes
EQ Research LLC
cbarnes@eq-research.com

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Grid Reliability Denials

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


Quantifying the Problem

• Survey data:
• 50 utility service territories with the most net-
metered residential customers
• 2013 and 2014
• # of applications submitted
• # average PTO waiting period
• # of applications denied due to grid reliability
concerns

EQ Research LLC | www.eq-research.com | info@eq-research.com


MDV-SEIA 2015 Solar Focus Conference

Net Energy Metering and Interconnection Processes

Presented by Inia Burginger, APR


November 17, 2015
Pepco Holdings, Inc. – Our Territory
 Service territory – 8,340 square miles
 Customers served
• Atlantic City Electric – NJ
− 546,000 (electric)
− 9,963 approved interconnections*
• Delmarva Power – DE and MD
− 510,000 (electric)
− 128,000 (natural gas)
− 3,826 approved interconnections*
• Pepco – DC and MD
− 815,000 (electric)
− 7,218 approved interconnections*
 Total population served ~ 5.6 million
• 21,007 interconnections approved*
* As of Oct. 31, 2015

We support renewable energy and partner with our customers to ensure


safe and reliable interconnection of renewable energy into the electric grid

November 17, 2015 2


NEM Application and Call Volumes are Increasing Sharply

PHI
 Applications have nearly
doubled in 2015 compared to
2014
• We expect them to double again
in 2016
– End of federal tax credit
– Aggregated and community net
metering programs
– Leasing programs and grants
– Association forecasts
o MDV-SEIA, SEPA
 Call volumes substantial but
leveling off
• 1,625 in October, down from
1,915 in September and up from
average of 1,436 / month
January-June
As of September 30, 2015
• Inquiries shifting from
application status to billing
questions
November 17, 2015 3
Regulatory Requirements – Guidelines to all PHI Processes
 Interconnection requirements differ substantially state to state,
region to region
 Regulatory requirements PHI follows are similar but different
state to state
• DC – Title 15, Chapter 40 of the D.C. Code of Municipal Regulations for
Small Generator Interconnection Rules (SGIR) and the D.C. Customer Net
Energy Metering Contract (NEM Contract) define Pepco’s application
process
• MD – Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 20.50.09 for Small
Generation Interconnection Standards (SGIS) defines the application
process Pepco follows. COMAR 20.50.10 for Net Metering Authority defines
the qualifications for net energy metering in Maryland
• DE – Title 26 of the Delaware Code, Chapter 10 and corresponding
regulations adopted by the Delaware Public Service Commission define the
net energy metering and interconnection application processes Delmarva
Power follows
• NJ – New Jersey Administrative Code Title 14, Chapter 8, Subchapter 4
defines net energy metering and Subchapter 5 defines the interconnection
application processes Atlantic City Electric follows
 All PHI processes follow these regulatory guidelines very closely

November 17, 2015 4


The NEM and Interconnection Process

Responsible
Steps Actions To Take
Party
1. Research • Research the various types of renewable energy systems available and decide which system • Customer
best fits consumption needs. Renewable energy-generating systems can be sized up to 200%
in Maryland, up to 110% in Delaware, and up to 100% in New Jersey and the District of
Columbia
• Customers should understand their electrical load and energy consumption
2. Select • Interview and select a licensed and reputable installing contractor • Customer

3. Apply • The customer should understand the documentation needed with the interconnection • Customer
agreement (e.g., rebate forms, permit applications, inspection forms)
• The customer applies and submits Part I of our interconnection application and agreement Apply for
along with the application fee and supporting documentation Building Permit
• Applications without supporting documentation will be delayed. The customer can resubmit a
corrected application and documentation
4. Approval • The customer waits for our Approval to Install before installing any renewable generator • Customer
equipment • PHI Utility
• We will provide the customer a written screening result or Approval to Install
5. Install • Begin constructing and installing the renewable generator facility • Customer

6. Inspect • After installation, submit Part II of our interconnection agreement, including a copy of the • Customer
certificate of completion and the inspection certificate
• We will review the customer’s documentation to verify the interconnection application meets • PHI Utility
regulatory requirements
7. Meter • We will install the net-capable meter • PHI Utility
8. Authorization • We will send the customer an Authorization to Operate letter • PHI Utility
9. Operate • Receipt of the authorization letter means the customer can operate the renewable system • Customer

November 17, 2015 5


Application Process Timeline and Checklist
13-25 business days 40 business days 20 business days

~80 business days

Responsible
Steps Actions To Take
Party
1. Research • Research the various types of renewable energy systems available and decide which system best fits • Customer
consumption needs. Renewable energy-generating systems can be sized up to 200% in Maryland, up
to 110% in Delaware, and up to 100% in New Jersey and the District of Columbia
Level 1 Applications • Customers should understand their electrical load and energy consumption

Complete application 2. Select • Interview and select a licensed and reputable installing contractor • Customer
Received to
Acknowledgement 3. Apply • The customer should understand the documentation needed with the interconnection agreement (e.g., • Customer
(3-10 days) rebate forms, permit applications, inspection forms)
• The customer applies and submits Part I of our interconnection application and agreement along with
Apply for
the application fee and supporting documentation
Engineering Review to Building Permit
• Applications without supporting documentation will be delayed. The customer can resubmit a corrected
Approval to Install
application and documentation
(10-15 days)
4. Approval • The customer waits for our Approval to Install before installing any renewable generator equipment • Customer
• We will provide the customer a written screening result or Approval to Install • PHI Utility
Customer Installs
and has Inspected 5. Install • Begin constructing and installing the renewable generator facility • Customer
(avg 40 days)
6. Inspect • After installation, submit Part II of our interconnection agreement, including a copy of the certificate of • Customer
completion and the inspection certificate
• We will review the customer’s documentation to verify the interconnection application meets regulatory • PHI Utility
Application Part II requirements
Received,
Meter Exchange, 7. Meter • We will install the net-capable meter • PHI Utility
Authorization to
Operate 8. Authorization • We will send the customer an Authorization to Operate letter • PHI Utility
(20 days)
9. Operate • Receipt of the authorization letter means the customer can operate the renewable system • Customer

November 17, 2015 6


Application Completions –
Compliance with Regulatory Metrics

Part I Applications Processed Within Regulated Timelines

Atlantic City
Pepco Delmarva Power
Electric
DC MD DE MD NJ

2011 81% 183 84% 329 54% 183 61% 107 29% 1,673

2012 100% 367 99% 511 97% 227 99% 160 88% 1,314

2013 99% 418 95% 814 99% 385 94% 188 97% 1,629

2014 89% 534 92% 2,143 97% 783 97% 425 97% 2,737

2015
97% 1,110 97% 4,900 80% 1,280 84% 940 81% 6,270
Forecast

November 17, 2015 7


GPC/NEM Process Improvements Since July 2015
 Established PHI Steering Committee to examine end-to-end
interconnection processes impacting GPC, Billing, Engineering, and
Meter Operations
 Realigned existing GPC Applications team into process groups
• Increases accountability within the teams and allows for teams to work across
jurisdictions to meet regulatory timeframes
 Implemented enhanced phone tree for calls into GPC to direct customers
to team handling their application; issues pertaining to billing are
forwarded to NEM Billing experts
• (1) Application Status and General Inquiries, (2) Meter Exchange, (3)
Permission to Operate, (4) Billing Inquiries
• Phone calls now answered live 10 a.m.-4 p.m.
 Hired 4 new GPC account coordinators to process applications; started in
September
 Shifted resources internally to meet increased application volume
 Added technology
• WMIS-based online application processing and tracking system launched
internally in late September to better coordinate applications with GPC,
Engineering, Meter Operations and Billing departments

November 17, 2015 8


Planned NEM Process Improvements
 NEM Online Application System –
early 2016 – benefits:
• Improves the accuracy and speed of
the NEM application process
• Features auto-data validation,
pull-down lists, and online signature
and fee payment
• Provides accurate and timely
compliance reports, plus business
reporting tools
• Improves the customer experience
and meets regulatory requirements
 Green Button Standard to provide customer usage data
• Enables MyAccount download functionality for customers
• Enables solar contractors access to replica of existing Third-Party
Supplier Portal
 Post Acceptable Inverters List on GPC websites

November 17, 2015 9


NEM Process Changes Being Evaluated
 Move meter exchange earlier in the process
 Implement over-the-air meter reprogramming
• Eliminate truck rolls for meter exchanges
 Simplify application forms and processes as part of the Working
Groups
 Clarify process for handling unauthorized installations

November 17, 2015 10


Use GPC Websites as Business Resources
www.pepco.com/gpc www.delmarva.com/gpc
www.atlanticcityelectric.com/gpc

 Interconnection Application and


Agreement Forms
 Printable Informational PDFs
• Application Checklist
• FAQ
• Unauthorized Interconnections
 Links to Applicable Regulations,
Rules, Tariffs, and Guidelines
 Restricted Circuit Maps
 Community Net Metering
 Aggregated Net Metering
 Renewable News and Useful Links
 Frequently Asked Questions

ALL FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED

November 17, 2015 11


NEM and Interconnections Customer Educational Materials

Request brochures
from
NEMEducation@
pepcoholdings.com

All PDFs can be printed


from
Pepco.com/gpc
Delmarva.com/gpc
AtlanticCityElectric.com/gpc

November 17, 2015 12


Restricted Circuit Maps
 Popular interactive tool
 Type in premise address
 Red – interconnection not
available
 Orange – interconnection
available for systems
up to 50 kW
 Yellow – interconnection
available for systems
up to 250 kW
 Interconnection may be
accommodated with system
upgrade at developer’s or
customer’s expense

November 17, 2015 13


Sign Up for Face-to-Face Meetings
 Especially helpful if you:
• Have incomplete applications returned to you
– We’ll review your actual returned applications and provide helpful hints
• Want to understand the application process better
 Best for your system size estimators and staff who complete
interconnection applications
 One meeting per company
• Invite as many staff as you’d like, including call-ins
 Meet at your business location in our service territory
• Or at any PHI business location
 Sign up today at our Informational Table
• Or email NEMEducation@pepcoholdings.com

November 17, 2015 14


NEM and Interconnections Webcasts
 Rotate among utilities
 Two per week (excluding holiday weeks)
• Mondays at noon
• Thursdays at 3 p.m.
 Register at:
• pepco.com/nemeducation
• delmarva.com/nemeducation
• atlanticcityelectric.com/nemeducation

November 17, 2015 15


Green Power Connection Contacts

 Read additional FAQs on the NEM and Interconnections websites


 Sign up for a face-to-face meeting
 Attend our NEM and Interconnections webcasts
 Contact us

www.pepco.com/gpc
gpc-south@pepco.com
(202) 872-3419

www.delmarva.com/gpc
www.atlanticcityelectric.com/gpc
gpc-north@pepcoholdings.com
(866) 634-5571

November 17, 2015 16


Interconnection Process
Improvements
SOLAR FOCUS 2015
Interconnection Process Improvements
Total system interconnection requests have been growing in many states, but growth patterns
differ
◦ Maryland: Exponential growth past 18 months, particularly in residential
◦ DC: Steady installation rate in both commercial and residential
◦ New Jersey: Moderate growth in residential, slow down in commercial

Many utility and developer interconnection processes are a function of volume


◦ Given the rapid increase, how can developers and utilities ensure that the system doesn’t get bogged
down with the volume?

What technology and process improvements can be made to increase throughput?


◦ Throwing more resources at an non-optimized process doesn’t always help
◦ Think of both physical process and back-office process

2
MD Installs (MW)
140

120

Rapid Growth in 100

Maryland

Total MW DC Installed
80
Maryland is experiencing exponential
growth in its solar deployment,
particularly in the residential sector
60
• Summer 2012: 1.1 MW / month

• Summer 2015: 8.9 MW / month


40

20

0
1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011 1/1/2012 1/1/2013 1/1/2014 1/1/2015
All data from PJM-GATS, retrieved 11/16/15
< 20 kW 20 kW - 2 MW > 2 MW

3
MD Installs (Systems)
18,000

16,000

14,000

Rapid Growth in
Maryland
12,000

Ttoal Systems Installed


10,000
While the total MW installed is
balanced between residential,
commercial, and utility scale, the total 8,000
number of systems is highly
concentrated in the residential sector
6,000

• Summer 2012: 180 res / month


4,000
• Summer 2015: 1,020 res / month

2,000

0
1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011 1/1/2012 1/1/2013 1/1/2014 1/1/2015

< 20 kW 20 kW - 2 MW > 2 MW

4
DC Installs (MW)
9

Steady Growth
in DC
6

Total MW DC Installed
5
Consistent growth in both residential
and commercial sectors, with growth
continuing at a linear pace 4

0
1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011 1/1/2012 1/1/2013 1/1/2014 1/1/2015

< 20 kW 20 kW - 2 MW

5
DC Installs (Systems)
1,800

1,600

1,400

Steady Growth 1,200

in DC

Ttoal Systems Installed


1,000
DC installs have not transitioned to
exponential growth, but have
remained steady for the past several 800
years

600

• Summer 2012: 33 res / month


• Summer 2015: 39 res / month 400

200

0
1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011 1/1/2012 1/1/2013 1/1/2014 1/1/2015

< 20 kW 20 kW - 2 MW

6
NJ Installs (MW)
800

700

NJ Scale from
600

Commercial 500

Total MW DC Installed
NJ total installed capacity is much
larger than MD (1,400 MW vs 350 400

MW), but most of the installs are in


the commercial and utility sector
300
However, growth in the commercial
sector has slowed substantially in past
few years, and while the residential 200
sector has grown, it has not reached
the recent rate of MD installations
100

0
1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011 1/1/2012 1/1/2013 1/1/2014 1/1/2015

< 20 kW 20 kW - 2 MW > 2 MW

7
NJ Installs (Systems)
35,000

30,000

NJ Scale from 25,000

Commercial

Ttoal Systems Installed


20,000
Commercial installs have slowed
substantially from 2012, while
residential grows at a steady pace
15,000

• Summer 2011: 86 com / month


10,000
• Summer 2015: 11 com / month

• Summer 2012: 464 res / month 5,000

• Summer 2015: 605 res / month


0
1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011 1/1/2012 1/1/2013 1/1/2014 1/1/2015

< 20 kW 20 kW - 2 MW > 2 MW

8
MD vs. NJ Residential Installs
1200

1000

800

MD vs. NJ

Systems Installed per Month


MD’s rate of installation has surpassed
NJ’s on an absolute basis, and 600

currently sits at 250% of NJ on a per


capita basis

Nearly all the increase has come in the 400


past 18 months

200

0
1/1/2011 1/1/2012 1/1/2013 1/1/2014 1/1/2015

NJ Res MD Res

You might also like