Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mangla Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra PDF
Mangla Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra PDF
doc
versus
ORAL JUDGMENT :-
With the consent of both sides, we take up the petition
Page 1 of 8
J.V.Salunke,PA
the lessor and one Mr. Jhaverchand Nemchand Mehta and his
Both these properties, styled as, City Survey No. 1742 and City
16th March, 1989 and after his death, the properties devolved
Page 2 of 8
J.V.Salunke,PA
19th June, 2007, the second respondent called upon the petitioner
on 25th June, 2007. The petitioner only requested that its name
Page 3 of 8
J.V.Salunke,PA
order, the second respondent has not complied with its request
gather and from the annexures to the writ petition is that there is
referred and what one can find is that the Collector purports to
have been a subject matter of lease and obtained from the then
Page 4 of 8
J.V.Salunke,PA
is that the land and the properties would be used for commercial
The Government must also obtain some benefits and in the form
will be recorded.
Page 5 of 8
J.V.Salunke,PA
Page 6 of 8
J.V.Salunke,PA
the present facts and circumstances. The State cannot refuse the
desires to recover some moneys. If the State has any law, rule or
then, reserving that right and the remedy in that behalf, it can
this case. However, this is not the first time that this court is
pronouncement by this court the State has not learnt any lesson
the Property Register Card, but forces it to move this court, then,
Page 8 of 8
J.V.Salunke,PA