This document provides a grading rubric for assessing student responses across five levels - from one (lowest) to five (highest). It evaluates responses based on their use of sources, details, structure, analysis and grammar. A one-level response uses no sources, includes errors and lacks relevant information. A two-level response cites some sources but relies on quotes or copying. A three-level response incorporates sources that support and contradict its arguments. Higher levels demonstrate wider knowledge, source use, context, and grammatical proficiency. Scores correspond to grades, with five being the highest grade.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document provides a grading rubric for assessing student responses across five levels - from one (lowest) to five (highest). It evaluates responses based on their use of sources, details, structure, analysis and grammar. A one-level response uses no sources, includes errors and lacks relevant information. A two-level response cites some sources but relies on quotes or copying. A three-level response incorporates sources that support and contradict its arguments. Higher levels demonstrate wider knowledge, source use, context, and grammatical proficiency. Scores correspond to grades, with five being the highest grade.
This document provides a grading rubric for assessing student responses across five levels - from one (lowest) to five (highest). It evaluates responses based on their use of sources, details, structure, analysis and grammar. A one-level response uses no sources, includes errors and lacks relevant information. A two-level response cites some sources but relies on quotes or copying. A three-level response incorporates sources that support and contradict its arguments. Higher levels demonstrate wider knowledge, source use, context, and grammatical proficiency. Scores correspond to grades, with five being the highest grade.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document provides a grading rubric for assessing student responses across five levels - from one (lowest) to five (highest). It evaluates responses based on their use of sources, details, structure, analysis and grammar. A one-level response uses no sources, includes errors and lacks relevant information. A two-level response cites some sources but relies on quotes or copying. A three-level response incorporates sources that support and contradict its arguments. Higher levels demonstrate wider knowledge, source use, context, and grammatical proficiency. Scores correspond to grades, with five being the highest grade.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
No reference to source Simple quotes to Selects sources that Uses a wide range of Refers to sources material. support answer OR large support and contradict relevant source material regularly and uses them copied sections of other interpretations. to evaluate the to substantiate own peoples ideas. reliability of arguments. interpretations. No relevant information Answer uses one or two Answer uses a Answer makes use of a Detailed subject or many factual errors. events, dates or names combination of events, range of wider knowledge is deplyed to add detail. policies, dates and knowledge to help place within answers in a way (Sentences or short personalities to provide events in context. No that clearly places paragraphs). Possibly detail. Possibly some factual errors. events into context. several factual errors. Factual errors. This answer recognises Student offers a simple Structured answer that Student recognises a Student knows how one cause and describes paragraph description of recognises a wide range range of factors, events link together, it. In comparative several causes. For of causes. The student evaluates them and shows this clearly and answers it will offer comparative answers it attempts to evaluate draws conclusions about recognises the varying descriptions of both may offer several these factors. the events based on his/ levels of significance of events. similarities and/ or herevaluation and causes and differences. provided evidence. consequences. Simple sentences, Structured sentences. Paragraphs are Paragraphs link together Well structured, spelling mistakes, Some spelling mistakes. structured. There are effectively. There are no analytical response that grammatical errors are Grammatical devices are few spelling mistakes in spelling mistakes in this makes use of a range of frequent. limited to full stops and the work. The student answer. Grammatical grammatical devices. No commas. makes use of a range of devices have been used spelling or punctuation appropriate grammatical appropriately. mistakes. devices – quotation marks etc. Totally irrelevant. Misses the point in large Drifts from the focus of Focussed, but lacks A clear, well focussed sections of the answer. the question. clarity in some places. response. Total>>>