Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter Ii - Case Study at Omv Petrom S.A.: Price/Earnings Ratio Method
Chapter Ii - Case Study at Omv Petrom S.A.: Price/Earnings Ratio Method
OMV Petrom is a Romanian oil company, the largest corporation in Romania, which,
according to “Ziarul Financiar” has a 2013 market value around RON 5,708 mn. Also, Petrom
represents the largest gas and oil producer in Eastern Europe with activities in the business
segments of Exploration and Production, Refining and Petrochemicals, Marketing, Gas and
Energy.
Regarding to the valuation process, this case study is assessing Petrom’s business
using the following three valuation methods:
1
Result interpretation:
If Petrom’s stocks are trading at 0.4441 RON/stock and the earnings per share for
most recent 12-month period is 0.0851 RON, then Petrom’s stock has a P-E ratio of 5 (adjusted);
with other words, the purchaser of the stock is paying 5 RON for every RON of earnings.
Earnings per share is the basic measure of a company’s performance from an ordinary
shareholder’s point of view. It is the amount of profit , in cents, attributable to each ordinary
share.
If this P-E ratio is compared to the P-E ratio of the industry the company is in:
Petrom OMV current P-E ratio Oil/Gas Industry (Integrated) P-E ratio
5.22 > (1*) 10.97
, results that either the stock is undervalued, or the company’s earnings are thought to be in
decline.
Investors are willing to buy shares in the company at 5.22 times last year’s earnings
compared with the previous year’s position when they were willing to pay 5.18 times the
earnings. This increase may be because the company is expected to grow as much as in the
previous year. The industry average PE increased year-on-year from 10.21 to 10.97, which may
suggest that this company is expected to generate greater growth or carries more risk than the
industry average.
“In terms of tools and techniques, Petrom follows the best international practices in
risk management and uses stochastic quantitative models to measure the potential loss associated
with the company’s risk portofolio under a 95% confidence level and a three-year horizon.
All risks are analysed based on their causes, consequences, historical trends, volatilities and cash
flow potential impact.” (2*)
(2*) (Petrom’s 2013 Integrated risk management system report).
Business risk free rate(3*) = 1− Confidence level associated with company’s risk portofolio
2
= 1− 0.95 = 0.05 = 5% ;
(3*) “What is the free-risk rate? A Search for the basic Building Block”, Aswath Damodaran,
Stern School of Business, New York University, December 2008).
The discount rate captures the business risk and represents the required rate of
return to make a business worthile, as an investment decision.
[Discount Rate > Business Risk Rate] ↔[11% > 5%]
assuming a 11% real return rate for fund providers in order to compensate inflation;
The real rate and money rate returns are linked by the formula (5*):
r = money rate;
1+𝑖
1+ r = ; where : h = inflation ;
1+ℎ
i = real rate;
1+i 1+𝑖
1+ 11%= ↔1.11= ↔ 1+ i=1.11×1.0479 ↔ i=0.1631↔i=16.31%
1+0.479 1.0479
3
Discounted Cash Flow method:
1/1.1631 = 0.859;
For Petrom, this income approach valuation tool determines the value of the business
based on its ability to generate desired economic benefits for the owners;
Furthermore, for achieving this 4-years-NPV result, mn. RON 22,130 ,the largest
contribution was provided by the 2013-real-cash-flows , which represents 36.36 % of the NPV,
including the influence of the last 4 years inflation.
4
Cash Flow evolution related to the investment
policy in the last 4 years
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
2010 2011 2012 2013
C.F. from operating
4,630 6,442 7,185 8,048
activities
investments 4,863 4,803 4,930 5,303
In other words, this positive NPV is an indication of the surplus funds available to the
investor now as a result of continuing the investment policy.
Overall, this valuation tool shows a desirable NPV, which can be understood as a
positive outcome if the investment appraisal is related to the outflows that Petrom is generating;
and , excepting the 2010 financial year, for the last years the cash flow from operating activities
exceeded the company’s investments – which reflects the importance of establishing the
investment policy by taking into account the business stream of future economic benefits
discounted to their present value.
The 3-rd valuation method is a mixed tool which involves the determination of fair
value of all assets and liabilities adjusted with the current value of the working capital business
in order to assess the importance of the covering the short-term obligations.
5
Petrom’s Working Capital adjusted (+/-) with asset accumulation policy:
mn. RON
Result interpretation:
The third valuation tool reflects the influence of off-balance sheet assets and
liabilities over the Petrom’s working capital in 2013 financial year.
Positive Working Capital, (mn. 320 RON), means the fact that the business
currently is able to pay-off its short-term liabilities with its current assets; Petrom’s currently
6.19 % financial excess of the operating liquidity available to business can be a signal that the
company might be able to expand its operations in the near future.
Total investments for Petrom in 201 are represented by mn. 5,303 RON even
the actual debt that the investor owes (mn. 237 RON) will be offsetted by the positive effect of
the assets accumulation policy which can be cash assets or real property.
6
A review over the customer contract made by a farm-out agreement between
Petrom and Repsol (a global integrated energy company) reveals the best example of real
property asset accumulation which is represented by a € 50 mn. investment in the next two years.