Is 1904 1961 (Presumptive SBC)

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

TABLE 2.

2 PRESUMPTIVE SAFE BEARING CAPACITY ( IS: 1904-1961 )


Note 1. Compactness or loosenEss of non-cohesive matenais may be determined by driving a
wooden picket of dimension 5cm x 5 cm x lOcm with a sharp point. The picket shall be
pushed vertically into the soil by full weight of a person and if the penetration of the picket
exceeds 20 cm, the loose state shall be asaumed to exist.

Note 2. No generalised values for presumptive safe bearing capacities can be given for these
types of soils. In such area, adequate site investigation shall be carried out and expert advice
shall be sought.

Note 3. Peat may occur in a very soft spongy condition or may be quite firm and compact.
While ultimate bearing capacity may be high in the compact cases very large consolidation
settlements occur even under small presures and the movements continue for decades.

Note 4. The strength of made-up ground depends on the nature of the material, its depth and
age, and the method used for consolidating it.

Note 5. The presumptive safe bearing values may be increased by an amount equal to weight
of the material (virgin soil) removed from above the bearing level, that is, the base of the
foundation.

Note 6. For non-coheisve soils, the presumptive safe bearing values shall be reduced by 50
percent if the water table is above or near the bearing surface of the soil. If the water table is
below tje bearing surface of the soil at a distance at least equal to the width of the foundation,
no such reduction shall apply. For intermediate depths of the water table, proportional
reduction of presumptive safe bearing value may be made.
TABLE 2.2 PRESUMPTIVE SAFE BEARING CAPACITY ( IS: 1904-1961 )
Builder's Engineer
 Home
 Posts RSS
 Comments RSS

DESIGN OF FOUNDATIONS - PRESUMPTIVE BEARING CAPACITY


VALUES FROM CODES.

For the design of foundations of lightly loaded structures and for a preliminary design of any
structure the presumptive safe bearing capacity may be used. The presumptive safe bearing
capacities of various types of soils are given in Table 2.2.

TABLE 2.2 PRESUMPTIVE SAFE BEARING CAPACITY ( IS: 1904-1961 )


Note 1. Compactness or loosenEss of non-cohesive matenais may be determined by driving a
wooden picket of dimension 5cm x 5 cm x lOcm with a sharp point. The picket shall be
pushed vertically into the soil by full weight of a person and if the penetration of the picket
exceeds 20 cm, the loose state shall be asaumed to exist.

Note 2. No generalised values for presumptive safe bearing capacities can be given for these
types of soils. In such area, adequate site investigation shall be carried out and expert advice
shall be sought.

Note 3. Peat may occur in a very soft spongy condition or may be quite firm and compact.
While ultimate bearing capacity may be high in the compact cases very large consolidation
settlements occur even under small presures and the movements continue for decades.

Note 4. The strength of made-up ground depends on the nature of the material, its depth and
age, and the method used for consolidating it.

Note 5. The presumptive safe bearing values may be increased by an amount equal to weight
of the material (virgin soil) removed from above the bearing level, that is, the base of the
foundation.

Note 6. For non-coheisve soils, the presumptive safe bearing values shall be reduced by 50
percent if the water table is above or near the bearing surface of the soil. If the water table is
below tje bearing surface of the soil at a distance at least equal to the width of the foundation,
no such reduction shall apply. For intermediate depths of the water table, proportional
reduction of presumptive safe bearing value may be made.
Categories: FOUNDATIONS

Related Post:

FOUNDATIONS

 Manufactured Foundation Drainage System Installation.


 MANUFACTURED FOUNDATION DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
 Prefabricated Foundation Drainage System Installation
 PREFABRICATED FOUNDATION AND SOIL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
 Design Example: Holed balanced foundation.
 Design Example: Trapezoidal balanced foundation.
 Design Example: Cantilever Balanced Foundation.
 Design Example: Rectangular Balanced Foundation.
 Balanced foundations (rectangular, cantilever, trapezoidal and holed) Design.
 Design Example: Tied Portal Frame Base.

0 comentarios:

Post a Comment

Newer Post » « Older Post Home

Search

Buscar:

Feed
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Labels
FOUNDATIONS (134) STRUCTURES (63) PILES (61) WATERPROOFING (58) SOILS
(47) FOOTINGS (30) SITE EXPLORATION (30) BUILDING (29) PAD FOUNDATIONS
(18) STRIP FOUNDATIONS (18) CONCRETE (15) RAFT FOUNDATIONS (14)
DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIONS (13) RETAINING WALLS (10) EXCAVATIONS (9)
SURFACE SPREAD FOUNDATIONS (9) DRILLED SHAFTS (6) MAT FOUNDATIONS
(5) SHEET PILE (5) WALLS (5) SLABS (4) SLIP CIRCLES AND UNDERPINNING (4)
STRUCTURAL DESIGN (4) STEEL (3) BULKHEADS (2) FLOOR (2) MASONRY (2)
ROOF (2) STONE (2) COLUMNS (1) DOORS (1) PIPES (1) TIMBER (1) TIMBER PILES
(1) VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION STRUCTURES (1) WINDOWS (1) WOOD
CONSTRUCTION (1)
Powered by Blogger.

Entradas populares
 COMPONENTS OF A BUILDING: Sub-structure and Super-structure.

A building has two basic parts: (i) Substructure or foundations, and (ii)
Superstructure. Sub-structure or Foundation is the lower p...

Design Example 3: Reinforced Strip Foundation.

The load-bearing wall of a single-storey building is to be supported on a wide


reinforced strip foundation. A site investigation has revea...

Example: Pile cap design.

A pile cap is required to transfer the load from a 400 mm × 400 mm column to four
600 mm diameter piles, as shown in Fig. 14.30 . Pile caps...

BORING METHODS - SITE EXPLORATION.

The following are the various boring methods commonly used: (i) Auger boring. (ii)
Auger and shell boring. (iii) Wash boring. (iv) Percus...

FOUNDATIONS FOR BLACK COTTON SOILS.


Black cotton soils and oher expansive soils have typical characteristics of shrinkage
and swelling due to moisture movement through them. Du...

TIMBERING OF TRENCHES - SOILS.

When the depth of trench is large, or when the sub-soil is loose, the sides of the trench
may cave in. The problem can be solved by adopting...

Design Example 5: Pad base – axial load plus bending moment (small eccentricity).

A column pad base is subject to an axial load of 200 kN (dead) plus 300 kN
(imposed), and a bending moment of 40 kNm. To suit site constrai...

 Driven Piles: Advantages and Disadvantages.

Piles may be of timber, steel or concrete. When the piles are of concrete, they are to
be precast. They may be driven either vertically or...

LIVE LOADS IN A BUILDING: on floors, on roofs.

Live loads, also called as super-imposed loads, consisi of moving or variable loads,
due to people or occupants, their furniture, temporary ...

TYPES OF FOUNDATIONS: Shallow foundation, Deep Foundations.

Foundations may be broadly classified under two heads: (a) Shallow Foundations (b)
Deep Foundations. According to Terzaghi, a foundat...

Blogs de Interés:
Seguidores
Archivo del blog
 ► 2016 (1)

 ► 2015 (11)

 ► 2014 (29)

 ► 2013 (158)

 ▼ 2012 (304)
o ► December (121)
o ► November (134)
o ▼ October (49)
 EXCAVATIONS IN GROUND WITH SUB-SOIL WATER.
 TIMBERING OF TRENCHES - SOILS.
 EXCAVATION AND TIMBERING OF FOUNDATION.
 SETTING OUT FOUNDATION TRENCHES.
 CAUSES OF FAILURES OF FOUNDATIONS AND REMEDIAL
MEA...
 METHODS OF IMPROVING SAFE BEARING PRESSURE OF
SOIL...
 SETTLEMENT OF FOUNDATIONS.
 DESIGN OF FOUNDATIONS - PRESUMPTIVE BEARING
CAPACI...
 Dutch cone test - SITE EXPLORATION.
 Standard Penetration Test - SITE EXPLORATION.
 PENETRATION TESTS - SITE EXPLORATION.
 Limitations of plate load test - FOUNDATION SITE E...
 PLATE LOAD: Safe bearing pressure on permissible s...
 PLATE LOAD: Test procedure - FOUNDATION SITE EXPLO...
 PLATE LOAD TEST - FOUNDATION SITE EXPLORATION.
 ANALYTICAL METHODS - FOUNDATIONS SITE
EXPLORATION....
 BEARING CAPACITY OF SOILS - SITE EXPLORATION.
 SOIL SAMPLES AND SAMPLERS - FOUNDATIONS SITE
EXPLO...
 CHOICE OF EXPLORATION METHOD - FOUNDATIONS.
 GEOPHYSIAL METHODS - SITE EXPLORATION.
 SUB-SURFACE SOUNDINGS - SITE EXPLORATION.
 BORING METHODS - SITE EXPLORATION.
 OPEN EXCAVATION (OPEN TRIAL PITS) - SITE EXPLORATI...
 METHODS OF SITE EXPLORATION.
 SITE INVESTIGATION AND SUBSOIL EXPLORATION: Design...
 DEEP FOUNDATIONS: Well Foundations (or caissons).
 DEEP FOUNDATIONS: Pier Foundation (drilled caisson...
 DEEP FOUNDATIONS: Pile Foundation.
 SHALLOW FOUNDATION - Mat Foundation (Raft Foundati...
 SHALLOW FOUNDATION - Strap Footings.
 SHALLOW FOUNDATION - Combined Footings: Rectagular...
 SHALLOW FOUNDATION - Spread Footings: Single footi...
 TYPES OF FOUNDATIONS: Shallow foundation, Deep Fou...
 Essential Requirements of a Good Foundation.
 Functions of Foundations.
 Foundations of Buildings and Structures: Introduct...
 WIND LOADS IN A BUILDING.
 LIVE LOADS IN A BUILDING: on floors, on roofs.
 DEAD LOADS IN A BUILDING.
 DESIGN LOADS IN A BUILDING.
 Building Finishes.
 Building Components: Vertical Transportation Struc...
 Doors, Windows and other Openings
 Building Components: Roof structures.
 Building Components: Floor Structures.
 Building Components: Masonry units: walls, columns...
 Building Components: Foundations.
 COMPONENTS OF A BUILDING: Sub-structure and Super-...
 TYPES OF BUILDINGS.

Builder's Engineer | Based on the Design by Tricks-Collection | Unlimited Entertainment like


TV Shows and Movies collections

You might also like