Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intelletual Property by Gordon v. Smith.
Intelletual Property by Gordon v. Smith.
by
CHALOEA BEYAM
Lecturer , School of Law
University of Zambia
303820367W
f' f/fJ^t{.>.&u c,7'/^y^
Bahais ,
_
3 S®^^®. 6 8 8 iji gg.bj a
- . -
^
- ^:
^
The status of refugees in Zambia is governed by
(
control )Act of 1970 * The two international Conventions
1969 .
on 2
4 September 1969 »
O.
r A.
IJ Conventions .
refugees "sur place ". These are persons who may normally
U Convention .Thls
of a refugee which is contained in the 0» A .
Convention accords refugee status to :
allude to the O.
A.U Convention 's additional definitions of
above , is misconceived .
, For persons entitled to diplomatic
U»N and 0« A .
U Conventions on the status of refugees is
the Refugee (
Control )Act is silent automatic application
0« A .
U Conventions .
Zimbabwe 's Refugees Act of -1985 and. Tanzania 's
U.
H and O^A .
U Conventions . Both acts state , as one of
Control )Act
1)of the Refugee (
Minister , Section 5(
as refugees ,
. Pursuant to this provision , refugee status
basis when
into Zambia to seek refuge and on individual
political
individual persons arrive into Zambia to seek
22
asylum ,
Those who seek political asylum on individual
Refugees (
TINITGR )as an advisor , and the Senior Passport and
within 7 days,
. As a result , fatal consequences have ensued -
seeking refuge ,,
as a security risk ,
in Zambia.
, For example , Zimbabwe 's Refugee Act provides
PQ
unlawful entry into or unlawful presence within Zimbabwe -
by establishing an i addition to an
ad. hoc Committee , n
conviction Control )
is not consistent with the Refugee (
sentence of imprisonment ,
(
Control )Act to duplicate the Minister of Home Affairs '
Act
Control )
refugees as contained in the Zambian Refugee (
varies in scope with that containedin the U M ,,
40
Under the Act refugees
. .Convention
Or<
restricted to problematic issues the legsl status of
fi
refugees in Zambian law. The differences "between
refugees .
tion
Attention
amen815Tc3.470926distr
two pieces of legislation is not itself adequate in order
Control )
is not surprising . In relative terms , the Refugee (
was held between 24th and 26the January 1985 « la. spite
16. See 0
' » 7> of the Act .
, Art 1,
17 . See Art 1(C ) (D) (E) (F) of the U.N. Convention
"
parags /!- and 5 of bhe O.A .U. Gonvention «
considered
1
8. These are persons who have committed acts
nI tact
as crimes -under conventional ciciminal law*
ever- persons who may have committed acts contrary
to the purposes of the UN and the OATJ ni Zambia are
legally eligi ble for refugee status ,
•19, See Ss 5 and 12 of Zimbabwe ' s Refugees Act and
S50 ) of Tanzania * s draft Act .
)
20 . See Ss4 and 5 of the Refugee (Control Act
57-