The document provides information about Project I, a semester-long mechanical engineering design project at IIT Kanpur. It outlines the project evaluation schedule, with three evaluations to assess project ideas, detailed design/analysis, and final drawings. It describes the goals of each evaluation and allocation of credits. Guidelines are provided for the conceptual design presentation at the first evaluation. Financial constraints and available resources are also mentioned. The document introduces the Project Evaluation Committee and what they will assess. Students are instructed to maintain a signed log book documenting their work.
The document provides information about Project I, a semester-long mechanical engineering design project at IIT Kanpur. It outlines the project evaluation schedule, with three evaluations to assess project ideas, detailed design/analysis, and final drawings. It describes the goals of each evaluation and allocation of credits. Guidelines are provided for the conceptual design presentation at the first evaluation. Financial constraints and available resources are also mentioned. The document introduces the Project Evaluation Committee and what they will assess. Students are instructed to maintain a signed log book documenting their work.
The document provides information about Project I, a semester-long mechanical engineering design project at IIT Kanpur. It outlines the project evaluation schedule, with three evaluations to assess project ideas, detailed design/analysis, and final drawings. It describes the goals of each evaluation and allocation of credits. Guidelines are provided for the conceptual design presentation at the first evaluation. Financial constraints and available resources are also mentioned. The document introduces the Project Evaluation Committee and what they will assess. Students are instructed to maintain a signed log book documenting their work.
The document provides information about Project I, a semester-long mechanical engineering design project at IIT Kanpur. It outlines the project evaluation schedule, with three evaluations to assess project ideas, detailed design/analysis, and final drawings. It describes the goals of each evaluation and allocation of credits. Guidelines are provided for the conceptual design presentation at the first evaluation. Financial constraints and available resources are also mentioned. The document introduces the Project Evaluation Committee and what they will assess. Students are instructed to maintain a signed log book documenting their work.
August 3, 2018 ME 451A: PROJECT-I Preamble The course description, as given in the 'Courses of Study' bulletin of the Institute is as follows: ME 451A: Project I (0-0-6-0-4) Project work involving the analysis, synthesis, material/component selection and detailed design of a mechanical system including the preparation of working drawings. The system may be integrated with electronic, electrical, hydraulic and other systems. Projects may be selected by students from any of the four streams: Thermal Sciences and Fluid Mechanics, Solid Mechanics and Design, Manufacturing Science, and Robotics. (The second semester’s work, Project-II, will consist of the fabrication of the system designed during the first semester). Therefore, as you can see, the B.Tech. Project that you are going to do during this academic year is actually the climax of the entire B.Tech. program that you have gone through and going through at IIT Kanpur. Our department and Institute encourage the students by giving a “Jayesh Memorial Award” for the best B.Tech. project which provides a fair amount of cash prize along with the certificates. There are few more very prestigious awards from the institute for the best B.Tech. project. Tentative Project Evaluation Schedule Evaluation 1: 25th August, 2018, Saturday, 9:30 AM onwards Objective: Present the project ideas to the Committee (PEC) Students should present several ideas (at least two)
Evaluation 3: 10th November (Saturday) and 11th November 2018 (Sunday)
From 9:30 AM onwards Objective: Detailed final engineering drawings
All the above evaluations will take place in the ME conference room, FB-364
Submission of Drawings to Central Workshop : 16th November 2018 (Friday)
The division of credit for the first semester’s work will be as under: 15 for Evaluation 1 30 for Evaluation 2 35 for Evaluation 3 20 to be awarded by the project adviser The first evaluation is primarily for the purpose of clearly presenting the project ideas to the Project Evaluation Committee (PEC). The second evaluation will look at the detailed design and analysis. The third evaluation amounts to the submission of the semester’s work; this submission will be in the form of the final assembly and parts drawings and the project report. The First Evaluation Each group will have a maximum of 6 minutes to present its project proposal. An additional 4 minutes will be given for discussion. The presentation will be through slides/power point. It is important that the presentation be planned with care and rehearsed. Presentation is expected to be coherent, brief and articulated. The idea is to make everything absolutely clear to the Committee --- the problem, as well as its solution --- within the six minutes. Neat sketches and diagrams, preferably pictorial, will be helpful. The outline of the presentation will take the following form: Name of the Project Problem Statement Description of the Conceptual Solution(s) Statement regarding what will be achieved or demonstrated in the end (at the time of the second evaluation, the Committee will demand specifications of the goals of the project). A conceptual design consists of a presentation of the solution concept; it leaves out the details of this solution. For example, if a fast rapid transit system is to be designed and compressed air levitation is the solution concept, the conceptual design at the first level will probably show the train with its air bearing pads and the track. Just how the pads are going to be made or deployed, the air flow paths, the dimensions of the pads, the capacity of the compressors, will not be included in this presentation. The presentation of conceptual designs is greatly enhanced by pictorial (3-D) diagrams rather than orthographic views. In a conceptual design, one designs the idea, not the hardware. The Committee will assess the merits of the proposal in the context of its feasibility, its content in terms of the amount of design/analysis that will be needed for its success, and the anticipated degree of difficulty in the execution of the project within the constraints of time, the capabilities of the Central Workshop, and finances. Financial Constraint At present, the Department subsidises each project to the tune of Rs. 6000 for purchases. By purchases we mean those items and services that are not available inside the Institute and must be bought from outside agencies. Steel, aluminium, brass stocks are normally issued from the Central Workshop depending on their availability. Likewise, electric motors and other items of hardware are often obtained on loan from one lab or another (also, students are encouraged to salvage parts from old projects). Machining time, likewise, is not charged to this subsidy. Casting and complex welding jobs often have to be taken out and have to be paid for; likewise, rolling element bearings or some other item of hardware may have to be bought. Projects sponsored by outside agencies or supported by funds from the Adviser’s projects are also welcome. Project Evaluation Committee The Committee will consist of the following members: 1. Dr. Sounak K. Choudhury (Convener) 2. Dr. P.S. Ghoshdastidar 3. Dr. Nachiketa Tiwari 4. Dr. Jishnu Bhattacharya 5. Representatives from Central Workshop
What the Committee will look for
In addition to evaluating the project, the Committee will pay attention to such details as Clarity in respect of the goals of the proposed project Execution in respect of the design and the presentation of the design Seriousness of purpose and the effort put in Students should maintain a log book for this course. All ideas, analysis, calculations, and sketches should be recorded in this log book, as should records of meetings with the Adviser. At the end of each meeting with the Adviser, the students should obtain his signature, with date, on the relevant page of the log book. The log book should be presented at each evaluation. All the evaluations are OPEN TO ALL OF YOU.