Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Assignment
Research Assignment
Semester 3(B)
Morning Shift
Student
Declaration………………………………………………………………………………………...…ii
Acknowledgement……………………………………………………..……………………….……iii
5.1 Findings…………………………………………………………………45
CHAPTER- 6: CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bibliography …………………………………………………………………51
ANNEXURES
Annexure 1………………………………………………………………..…53
LIST OF FIGURES
4.1 Percentage of Responses Received for Question 1 25
This is to certify that the summer training project titled “IMPACT OF THE GOODS AND
SERVICES TAX ON HOUSEHOLD AND REAL ESTATE” is an academic work done by
“SRISHTI SHARMA” submitted in the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the
degree of “Bachelors in Business Administration” from “Rukmini Devi Institute of Advanced
Studies, New Delhi” under my guidance and direction. To the best of my knowledge and belief
the data and information presented by her in the project has not been submitted earlier elsewhere.
Swati Oberoi
Assistant Professor
This to certify that I have completed the project titled “IMPACT OF THE GOODS AND
SERVICES TAX ON HOUSEHOLD AND REAL ESTATE” under the guidance of “SWATI
OBEROI” in the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of “Bachelors
in Business Administration” from “Rukmini Devi Institute of Advanced Studies, New Delhi.”
This is an original work and I have not submitted it earlier elsewhere.
SRISHTI SHARMA
I have taken efforts in this project. However, it would not have been possible without the kind
support and help of my fellow group members. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to all of
them for their hard work and team effort.
I highly appreciate the faculty member, SWATI OBEROI for her guidance and constant
supervision as well as for providing necessary information regarding the research project.
I would also like to express my gratitude towards my parents for their kind co-operation and
encouragement which helped me in the completion of this project.
A special thanks to all those people who spared their valuable time for filling our questionnaires.
Lastly, our course coordinator, DR. SMITA MISHRA needs a special mention for her support
and motivation.
SRISHTI SHARMA
(Morning Shift)
CHAPTER 1
PLAN OF STUDY
1.1 What is GST?
Goods & Services Tax Law in India is a comprehensive, multi-
stage, destination-based tax that will be levied on every value
addition.
In simple words, GST is an indirect tax levied on the supply of goods and
services. GST Law has replaced many indirect tax laws that previously
existed in India.
So, before Goods and Service Tax, the pattern of tax levy was as
follows:
Under the GST regime, tax will be levied at every point of sale.
Now let us try to understand “GST is a comprehensive, multi-
stage, destination-based tax that will be levied on every value
addition.”
Multi-stage
There are multiple change-of-hands an item goes through along its
supply chain : from manufacture to final sale to consumer.
Let us consider the following case:
Goods and Services Tax will be levied on each of these stages, which
makes it a multi-stage tax.
Destination-Based
The tax would accrue to the taxing authority which has
jurisdiction over the place of consumption which is also termed
as place of supply.
1.2 History of GST in India
e. lesser compliances
In most cases, the tax structure under the new regime will be as
follows:
1.4 Benefits
Goods and Services Tax is a win win situation for the entire
country. It brings benefits to all the stakeholders of industry,
government and the consumer. It will lower the cost of goods
and services give a boost to the economy and make the
products and services globally competitive. Gst aims to make
india a common market with common tax rates and procedures
and remove the economic barriers thus paving the pay for an
integrated economy at the national level. By subsuming most
of the central and state taxes into a single tax and by allowing a
set-off of prior – stage taxes for the transactions across the
entire value chain, it would mitigate the ill effects of cascading
improve competitiveness and improve liquidity of the business.
Gst is a destination based tax. It follows a multi-stage collection
mechanism. In this, tax is collected at every stage and the credit
of tax payed at the previous stage is available as a set off at the
next stage of transaction. This shifts the tax incidence closer to
the consumer and benefits the industry through better cash
flows and better working capital management
Goods and Services Tax is largely technology driven. It will
reduce the human interface to a great extent and this would
lead to speedy decisions
Goods and Services Tax will give a major boost to the “make in
India” initiative of the government of India by making goods
and services produced in India competitive in the national as
well as international market. Also all imported goods will be
charged to the integrated tax (IGST) which is equivalent to the
Central GST + State GST. This will bring equality with taxations
on local products.
Under the GST regime, exports will be zero-rated in entirely
unlike the present system where refund of some taxes may not
take place due to fragmented nature of in directed taxes
between the centre and the states. This will boost Indian
exports in the international market thus improving the balance
of payments position. Exporters with clean track record will be
rewarded by getting immediate refund of 90% of their claims
arising on accounts of exports, with in 7 days.
GST is expected to bring buoyancy to the government revenue
by widening the tax base and improving the tax compliance.
GST is likely to improve India’s ranking in the ease of doing
business index and is estimated to increase the GDP growth by
1.5 to 2%
Gst will bring more transparency to indirect tax laws. Since the
whole supply chain will be taxed at every stage with credit of
taxes paid at the previous stages being available for set off at
the next stage of supply, the economics and tax value of
supplies will be easily distinguishable. This will help the
industries to take credit and the govt. to verify correctness of
taxes paid and the consumer to know the exact amount of
taxes paid.
The gst would apply to all goods other than alcoholic liquor for human
consumption and five petroleum products, viz. petroleum, crude,
motor spirit, high speed disel, natural gas and aviation turbine fuel. It
would apply to all services barring a few specified. The gst would
replace the following taxes currently levied and collected by the centre:
a. State VAT
b. Central Sales Tax
c. Luxury Tax
d. Entry Tax
e. Entertainment and Amusement Tax
f. Tax on advertisements
g. Purchase Tax
h. Taxes on lotteries, betting and gambling
i. State Surcharges and Cesses so far as they relate to supply of
goods and services
The list of exempted goods and services would be common for the
centre and the states.
A single indirect tax which covers all goods and services will, in the long
run, increase tax collection by making it easier for retailers and several
other businesses to comply and also moderate overall taxation levels.
That said, it should be remembered that the favorable effects of this
new taxation regime will become evident only within 2-3 years of its
implementation
There are many sectors that are affected after the implementation of
GST but this project only focuses on the two main sectors that are the
household and the industry (real estate).
Your life style bills are likely to go up. For example, be it air travel or
train travel; travelling by premium classes means you pay higher rate of
GST compared to economy classes. Your mobile bill and monthly DTH
bills will get costlier as the rate of GST will take the service tax from
15% to 18%. However, most telecom companies have been pampering
customers with freebies and additional discounts hence the overall
impact may not be really palpable.
Though the goods and services tax (GST) tax structure has been
announced, there is still a lot of conjecture about which tax rate will be
applicable to the real estate and construction industry.
The taxes in the real estate sector increased upto to 12%. However,
the GST rate is not the only important factor. The abatement rules as
applicable under the service tax regime and the input tax credit facility
for developers will determine if the effective tax incidence on real
estate is lower or higher under GST.
The Government has offered some clarity on the abatement rules for
under-construction houses and input tax credit benefits for developers.
That said, rental yields in major cities could certainly moderate if GST is
levied on rental housing. In India, rental yields in housing are quite
modest at around 2-4% on an average. Rents may either hold steady or
decline marginally due to increase in housing stock. However, it is also
true that most investors in the residential sector do not invest for rental
yields but rather for the capital value appreciation, so reduced rental
yields would not independently impact sentiment.
The process used to collect information and data for the purpose of
making business decisions. The methodology may include publications,
research, interviews, surveys, and other research techniques, and could
include both present and historical information.
Sources of
Data
Primary Secondary
Primary Sources of Data:
Primary sources are the first hand evidence left behind by observers all
the time of events. Primary sources originate in the time period that
historians are studying. They vary a great deal. They may include
personal memoirs, government documents, oral histories,
questionnaires, self observation, etc. In primary sources of data, we
have administered questionnaires and few information has been
collected through observation.
3.5 LIMITATIONS
There are mainly two limitations of the project report i.e.
vast population.
Options Frequency
Yes 76
No 1
NO 1
MEAN = ΣX/N
= 76+1/2
=78/2
=39
= (78/2) TH TERM
= 39 TH TERM
= YES
Question 2:- Are you aware about the implication of GST in India?
Options Frequency
Yes 68
No 10
YES 68
NO 10
MEAN = ΣX/N
= 68+10/2
= 78/2
= 39
MEDIAN = (N/2) TH TERM
= (78/2) TH TERM
= 39 TH TERM
= yes
Household 35
Real estate 38
Real estate 38
Option 3 1
MEAN = ΣX/N
= 35+38+1/3
= 74/3
= 24.66
= (74/2) TH TERM
= 37 TH TERM
= real estate
Yes 26
No 17
May be 34
YES 26
NO 17
MAYBE 34
MEAN = ΣX/N
= 26+17+34/3
= 77/3
= 25.66
= (77+1/2) TH TERM
= 39 TH TERM
= may be
Question 5:-According to you the gap between the rich and the poor
has ________ ?
Options Frequency
Increase 55
Decrease 21
Decrease 21
MEAN = ΣX/N
= 55+21/2
= 76/2
= 38
= (76/2) TH TERM
= 38 TH TERM
= increase
Yes 34
No 22
Maybe 20
Table 4.6 Frequency of Responses Received for Question 6
INTERPRETATION
YES 34
NO 22
MAYBE 20
MEAN = ΣX/N
= 34+22+20/3
= 76/3
= 25.3
= (76/2) TH TERM
= 38 TH TERM
= yes
Options Frequency
Yes 54
No 10
May be 12
INTERPRETATION
YES 54
NO 10
MAYBE 12
MEAN = ΣX/N
= 54+10+12/3
= 76/3
= 25.33
= (76/2) TH TERM
= 38 TH TERM
= yes
Yes 45
No 28
INTERPRETATION
YES 45
NO 28
MEAN = ΣX/N
= 45+28/2
= 73/2
= 36. 5
MEDIAN = (N+1/2) TH TERM
= (73+1/2) TH TERM
= 37 TH TERM
= yes
Question 9:- The tax system is all about balance between minimizing
compliance costs and maximizing revenue.
Options Frequency
Strongly disagree 8
Disagree 12
Neutral 29
Agree 18
Strongly agree 6
INTERPRETATION
DISAGREE 12
NEUTRAL 29
AGREE 18
STRONGLY AGREE 6
MEAN = ΣX/N
= 8+12+29+18+6/5
= 73/5
= 14.6
= (73+1/2) TH TERM
= 37TH TERM
= neutral
MODE = Since neutral more than strongly disagre, disagree, agree and strongly
agre
Strongly disagree 8
Disagree 8
Neutral 30
Agree 24
Strongly agree 4
INTERPRETATION
AGREE 8
NUTERAL 30
DISAGREE 24
SRONGLY DISAGREE 4
MEAN = ΣX/N
= 8+8+30+24+4
= 74/5
=14.8
= (74/2) TH TERM
= 37 TH TERM
= AGREE
AGREE 37
NUTERAL 30
DISAGREE 4
SRONGLY DISAGREE 6
MEAN = ΣX/N
= 13+37+30+4+6/3
= 90/3
= 30
= (90/2) TH TERM
= 45 TH TERM
=neutral
1. Around 98.7% of the people are aware about the Goods and Services Tax, whereas
there are still 1.3% of people who are unaware of it.
2. Around 88.2% of the people are aware of the implementation of the Goods and
Services Tax in India, whereas 11.8% of people are still not aware about it’s
implementation.
3. Around 52.1% people believe that the real estate (industry) sector is adversely
affected by the Goods and Services Tax, where as 47.9% of people believe that the
household sector is adversely affected by the Goods and Services Tax.
4. There are around 32.9% of people who think that the implementation of the Goods
and Services Tax is beneficial, whereas there are 22.4% of people who think that
implementation of the Goods and Services Tax is not beneficial. Also there are
44.7% of people who r not sure whether the implementation of the Goods and
Services Tax is beneficial or not.
5. After the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax 72.4% of people believe
that the gap between the rich and the poor has increased, whereas there are 27.6%
of people who think that the Goods and Services Tax has decreased the gap
between the rich and the poor.
6. There are 44.7% of people who believe that the Goods and Services Tax has
impacted on their spending behavior on household items.
7. There are 28.9% of people who believe that the Goods and Services Tax has not
impacted on their spending behavior on household items
8. There are 26.3% of people who do not know whether the Goods and Services Tax
has impacted on their spending behavior on household item or not.
9. Around 71.1% of people think that the state governments should offer a subsidy on
items, if there is an unreasonable spike in their prices.
10. Around 13.2% of people think that the state governments should not offer a
subsidy on items, if there is an unreasonable spike in their prices.
11. Around 15.8% of people are not sure whether the state governments should offer a
subsidy or not on items, if there is an unreasonable spike in their prices.
12. Around 61.6% of people believe that the home loans have become expensive
subsequent to the kicking in of GST.
13. Around 38.4% of people believe that the home loans have not become expensive
subsequent to the kicking in of GST.
14. Around 11% of people strongly disagree that the tax system is all about balance
between minimizing compliance costs and maximizing revenue.
15. Around 16.4% people disagree the tax system is all about balance between
minimizing compliance costs and maximizing revenue.
16. Around 39.7% of people are neutral that the tax system is all about balance
between minimizing compliance costs and maximizing revenue.
17. Around 24.7% of people agree that the tax system is all about balance between
minimizing compliance costs and maximizing revenue.
18. Around 8.2% of people strongly agree that the tax system is all about balance
between minimizing compliance costs and maximizing revenue.
19. Around 10.8% of people strongly disagree that the Current taxation system for
goods and service in our state made in the tax design and administration the
systems at both central and state levels remain complex.
20. Around 10.8% of people disagree that the Current taxation system for goods and
service in our state made in the tax design and administration the systems at both
central and state levels remain complex.
21. Around 40.5% of people are neutral that the Current taxation system for goods and
service in our state made in the tax design and administration the systems at both
central and state levels remain complex.
22. Around 32.4% of people agree that the Current taxation system for goods and
service in our state made in the tax design and administration the systems at both
central and state levels remain complex.
Around 5.4% of people strongly agree that the Current taxation system for goods and
service in our state made in the tax design and administration the systems at both
central and state levels remain complex.
5.2 Suggestions
Multiple state wise registrations will be a major hurdle for service providers who operate in
multiple states or all India basis.
Procedures proposed for registration and returns are complex, cumbersome and regressive.
Provision of classification, valuation supply etc also go against the principle of ease of doing
business.
Department should not have power to refuse registration which will adversely affect the
business men. Grant of registration must be made obligatory as is at present.
Multiple registrations of same person in different states should be done away with. The
concept of centralized registration should be provided for. Further, it should be mandated to
provide in return, the details of all locations from which supply of goods / services is made by
him.
Threshold limit for registration should be common for entire country. Presently it is proposed
Rs. 4 lakh for North East and Rs. 9 lakh for others. Alternatively, there should be a sunset clause
for this, (say 2 years).
Definition of aggregate turnover is suitably amended so as to exclude the value of exempt and
non-taxable supplies from aggregate turnover to make it meaningful and objective. Otherwise
the purpose of exemption / threshold will be defeated.
Definition of supply should be ‘comprehensive’ and not inclusive. It is defined as ‘supply
includes’ rather than supply means….’ This will add to litigation. The supply of capital goods
(whether to own depot or to the customer) be kept outside the purview of GST , and only the
leasing / renting / transfer of right to use the asset be subject to tax.
Inter-state activities should exclude activities of same person. These activities are unnecessary
under the GST law, unworkable and will be tantamount to creating inter-state fiscal frontiers,
impeding free flow of goods and / services within the common market of India.
The definition of manufacturer should be delinked from Central Excise Act and an elaborate
definition of the term ‘manufacture’ be provided to avoid litigation and interpretational issues.
Threshold exemption limit should be kept at least at Rs. 25 lakh for services and Rs. 2 crore for
goods as anybody with lower limit can always voluntarily get registered. Also, small and
medium entities may find it difficult to maintain electronic records and wish to avoid
unnecessary inspections / litigations from the tax Department.
Composition Scheme is meant for small taxable persons like neighborhood stores who does not
keep record of their turnover and does not issue invoices. No facility is given to them in case
they are expected to keep their turnover record. Also, the rate of tax should be percentage of
their taxable supplies (inputs), the record of which exists in electronic ledger. Linking of rates
with total turnover will distort the total scheme.
Composition threshold should be not below Rs. one crore. Disallowing composition benefit to
the persons who affect any interstate supply of goods and / or services shall work against the
interest of small assesses as there might be a possibility that in aggregate turnover of Rs. 50
lakhs only a small amount constitute inter-state supply of goods or services which will deny him
of the benefit of composition scheme.
Valuation rules are too cumbersome so as to even prescribe valuation of services without
consideration.
Transaction value of goods and services should factor the ‘discounts’. There should be no tax on
free supplies.
In GST system, it is expected that the figures submitted for GST returns will be validated with
figures submitted to Income tax. Given the fact that the sale and provision of services is one of
the factors for charging of tax, the taxable figures in GST will be far different than figures in
accounts or in income tax. A system needs to be built so that the figures in other data base
could be used for validation of figures in GST.
The concept of granting input tax credits based on the matching concept of uploading data and
filing of valid returns by the supplier of such taxable person will most certainly lead to
innumerable amount of litigations on account of a few unscrupulous dealers.
Input tax credit should not be denied to real estate sector and allowed to works contracts only.
Guidelines for valuation of land should be made clear and transparent. Also, non-subsuming of
stamp duty in GST should be reconsidered.
Reversal of input tax credit used for goods and / or services used for personal or private
consumption should be allowed.
Concept of TCS to be done away with as it proves to be detrimental to small suppliers and leads
to blockage of funds in TCS.
Rate of interest on delay in payment of refunds by the Government should be kept at par with
the provisions relating to interest payable on delay in payment of taxes by the tax payer.
Requirement of double payment of taxes be eliminated. Further, the refund / adjustment
procedure for such cases be made fast-tracked, simple and quick.
Government should not hurry implementation of GST from April, 2017. There is lot of ground
work to be done. The most important is awareness, education, training and trial runs. 1 st April
2017 is not that sacrosanct but introduction of a perfect law at the right time is more
important. Country can wait for a strong and robust GST law for some more time.
Chapter-6
Conclusion
This Research Project shows the impact of the Goods and Services Tax on household and the
real estate sector, it also shows what the people think or believe by the implementation of the
Goods and Services Tax. Although the true impact of the goods and Services Tax will be shown
after 2-3 years of it’s implementation.
As we started doing survey, it came to our notice that around 98.7% of the people are aware
about the Goods and Services Tax, whereas there are still 1.3% of people who are unaware of it
from which round 88.2% of the people are aware of the implementation of the Goods and
Services Tax in India, whereas 11.8% of people are still not aware about it’s implementation
Frequency of 38 people i.e. 52.1% of population believes that the real estate (industry) sector is
adversely affected by the Goods and Services Tax, where as the frequency of 35 people i.e.
47.9% of people believe that the household sector is adversely affected by the Goods and
Services Tax.
Then there were few people who believed that the implementation of the Goods and Services
Tax is not beneficial.
Also, 72.4% of people believes that the gap between the rich and the poor has increased after the
implementation of the Goods and Services Tax.
There are 44.7% of people who feel that the Goods and Services Tax has impacted on their
spending behavior on household items.
Most of the people think that the state governments should offer a subsidy on items, if there is an
unreasonable spike in their prices.
61.6% of people believe that the home loans became expensive subsequent to the kicking in of
Goods and Services Tax.
39.7% of the people were neutral to the statement that the tax system is all about balance
between minimizing compliance costs and maximizing revenue.
40.5% of people were again neutral to the statement that the current taxation system for goods
and service in our state made in the tax design and administration the systems at both central and
state levels remain complex.
Hence it is concluded that people are getting aware day by day of the Goods and Services Tax,
also that most of the people feel that the real estate sector is more adversely effected by the
Goods and Services Tax than the household sector and that majority of people believe that the
Goods and Services Tax is beneficial.
BIBLOGRAPHY
1. www.cbec.gov.in
2. www.google.com
3. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com
ANNEXURE
Name: ______
Email address: ________
Age: _________
Gender:_______