Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in French Hospitals Between 2001 and 2011: Back To Susceptibility

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

DOI 10.1007/s10096-014-2125-8

ARTICLE

Pseudomonas aeruginosa in French hospitals between 2001


and 2011: back to susceptibility
C. Slekovec & J. Robert & D. Trystram & J. M. Delarbre & A. Merens &
N. van der Mee-Marquet & C. de Gialluly & Y. Costa & J. Caillon & D. Hocquet &
X. Bertrand & on behalf of the ONERBA

Received: 20 January 2014 / Accepted: 10 April 2014


# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Abstract The European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveil- P. aeruginosa antimicrobial drug resistance at six French hos-
lance Network (EARS-Net) reported an increase in the rates pitals over a longer period of time (2001–2011) and with a
of resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antimicrobials constant definition of resistance. After the exclusion of incom-
between 2008 and 2011 in France. This alarming report was plete data and duplicates, we sorted 34,065 isolates into the
based on data collected during the harmonisation of antimicrobial resistance patterns defined by the European Cen-
breakpoints by the European Committee on Antimicrobial tre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The proportion
Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) committee. However, these of isolates with a resistant pattern (non-susceptible to one or two
data were not supported by the findings of other national antimicrobial categories), a multidrug-resistant pattern (non-
surveillance networks. In this study, we assessed the trends in susceptible to three or four antimicrobial categories) or an
extensively drug-resistant pattern (non-susceptible to five or
C. Slekovec : D. Hocquet : X. Bertrand (*) six antimicrobial categories) decreased significantly over time.
Service d’Hygiène Hospitalière, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Logically, the proportion of isolates with a wild-type resistance
Besançon, 3, Boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon Cedex, France pattern has increased significantly over the same period. No
e-mail: xavier.bertrand@univ-fcomte.fr
significant changes in the rates of resistance to cephalosporins
C. Slekovec : D. Hocquet : X. Bertrand and penicillins were observed, whereas carbapenem resistance
UMR 6249 Chrono-Environnement, Université de Franche-Comté, rates increased. By contrast, the proportion of isolates resistant
Besançon, France to fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and monobactams de-
J. Robert : D. Trystram
creased significantly over time. In conclusion, our data do not
Service de Bactériologie-Hygiène, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié confirm the EARS-net data, suggesting instead that antimicro-
Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France bial drug resistance in P. aeruginosa might not have increased
in French hospitals over the last decade.
J. M. Delarbre
Service de Bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier de Mulhouse,
Mulhouse, France
Introduction
A. Merens
Laboratoire de bactériologie, Hôpital d’instruction des armées Bégin, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major cause of infection in
Saint-Mandé, France
hospitalised patients with localised or systemic immune system
N. van der Mee-Marquet : C. de Gialluly defects [1]. Antimicrobial drug resistance in P. aeruginosa is
Laboratoire de bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de driven by the extraordinary capacity of this bacterium to de-
Tours, Tours, France velop resistance to almost any antibiotic, through the selection
Y. Costa of mutations in chromosomal genes and the spread of horizon-
Laboratoire de bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier de Lagny-Marne la tally acquired resistance [2], and it constitutes a growing threat.
vallée, Lagny-sur-Marne, France Indeed, increasing numbers of Ambler class A extended-
spectrum β-lactamases (such as TEM, SHV, PER, GES, VEB
J. Caillon
Laboratoire de bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de and BEL), class B carbapenemases (metallo-β-lactamases such
Nantes, Nantes, France as IMP, VIM, SPM and GIM) and class D extended-spectrum
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

oxacillinases (ES-OXA) are being reported in clinical strains of routine microbiology methods. Antimicrobial drug suscepti-
P. aeruginosa of various geographic origins [3–8]. The cross- bility was determined using the agar diffusion method, ac-
resistance to multiple antibiotic families can also occur in the cording to the recommendations of the Antibiogram Commit-
absence of foreign gene acquisition, after the mutation of tee of the French Microbiology Society (CA-SFM) [12].
regulators of broad-specificity multidrug efflux systems. Mul- Inhibition zone diameters were extracted retrospectively from
tidrug resistance in P. aeruginosa makes it both difficult and laboratory databases for 12 antimicrobial drugs grouped into
expensive to treat infections, and can increase morbidity and seven antimicrobial drug categories according to ECDC rec-
mortality [1]. The surveillance of antibiotic resistance trends in ommendations [13]: aminoglycosides (gentamicin,
this pathogen is therefore crucial. The 2011 European Antimi- tobramycin, amikacin), carbapenems (imipenem,
crobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) report meropenem), cephalosporins (ceftazidime, cefepime),
indicated that, despite the high proportions of resistance ob- fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin), penicillins (ticarcillin–
served in European P. aeruginosa isolates in 2011, the overall clavulanic acid, piperacillin–tazobactam), monobactam
situation was stable, with few countries reporting a significant (aztreonam) and colistin. As determination of colistin resis-
trend towards an increase or decrease in resistance [9]. This tance using the disk diffusion method is not relevant [14], we
report indicated that, between 2008 and 2011, resistance rates did not take into account the data for colistin resistance.
in France significantly increased for all the antimicrobial agents Annual numbers of patient-days were collected for each hos-
under surveillance: ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, cipro- pital, other than Tours Hospital for 2001–2005 (owing to
floxacin, aminoglycosides and carbapenems, and combined missing data), for the calculation of incidence density rates.
resistance. These data were collected during the harmonisation
of breakpoints by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Data analysis
Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) committee [10]. The EARS-
Net data were obtained from three French networks of the Isolates were classified as susceptible or non-susceptible to the
ONERBA (French observatory of the epidemiology of bacte- panel of antipseudomonal compounds. We applied 2013
rial resistance to antibiotics). However, the trend towards EUCAST guidelines [10] for the interpretation of inhibition
higher resistance was not supported by the data for the other zone diameters for all antipseudomonal agents, except for
surveillance networks of the ONERBA, which reported overall aztreonam, for which CA-SFM breakpoints were used [12].
stability [11]. For antimicrobial drug categories for which more than one
We therefore hypothesised that the discrepancies between agent was tested (e.g. imipenem and meropenem for the
the time trends observed by the EARS-Net and by most of the carbapenem category), susceptibility to the least effective
other ONERBA networks were probably linked to changes in compound was used to classify the entire category. Isolates
the definitions of resistance, which were not taken into ac- were then sorted into four antimicrobial resistance patterns,
count in the trend analysis. We therefore evaluated time trends according to ECDC recommendations [13]. Wild-type isolates
in the antimicrobial drug resistance of P. aeruginosa, within a (WT) were susceptible to all agents; resistant (R) isolates were
sample of French hospitals, over a longer period of time non-susceptible to one or two categories of antimicrobial
(2001–2011), using a constant definition of resistance based drugs; multidrug-resistant isolates (MDR) were non-
on current breakpoints [10]. susceptible to three or four categories of antimicrobial drugs
and extensively drug-resistant isolates (XDR) were non-
susceptible to five or six categories of antimicrobial drugs.
Materials and methods Duplicates were defined on the basis of patient identity, iso-
lation time and antimicrobial resistance pattern. We retained
Study setting only one isolate per pattern, per patient and per year. We
determined the proportion of non-susceptible isolates for each
Six French hospitals collaborating with ONERBA participat- antimicrobial class and the crude incidence of antimicrobial
ed in this study: three university-affiliated hospitals resistance drug patterns per 1,000 patient-days. A subanalysis
(Besançon, Paris-La Pitié-Salpétrière, Tours), two general was performed with isolates obtained from blood cultures.
hospitals (Lagny-sur-Marne and Mulhouse) and one hospital
of the Military Health Service (Saint-Mandé). Five of the six Statistical analysis
hospitals provided data for the EARS-Net survey.
We used non-parametric Spearman rank tests to analyse the
Collection of data trends in terms of proportions. The rho (ρ) value (Spearman’s
rank correlation coefficient) obtained in this test lies between
All P. aeruginosa isolates were obtained from clinical speci- −1 and +1. Values close to −1 or +1 indicate a negative or a
mens (screening specimens excluded) and identified by positive correlation respectively. Values close to 0 indicate an
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

= 0.944, p<0.001
WT

= -0.874, p<0.001
R

= -0.916, p=0.001
MDR
= -0.601 p=0.039
XDR

Fig. 1 Trends in the proportions (%) of the different antibiotic resistance resistance pattern, solid grey line resistant (R) pattern, dashed black line
patterns defined by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and multidrug-resistant (MDR) pattern, solid black line extensively drug-
Control (ECDC) for P. aeruginosa isolated at six French hospitals be- resistant (XDR) pattern. The ρ value is Spearman’s rank correlation
tween 2001 and 2011 (n=34,065). Dashed grey line wild-type (WT) coefficient

absence of correlation. We used a negative binomial regres- were from blood cultures) were considered for analysis
sion test to analyse trends in incidence. The regression coef- (2,763 to 3,382 isolates per year).
ficient (b) obtained expresses the expected change in the The proportion of isolates that showed R, MDR and XDR
logarithm of the expected number of counts of the response resistance patterns decreased significantly over time (Fig. 1).
variable for a one-unit change in the predictive variable. By contrast, the proportion of isolates with a WT resistance
Probability of 0.05 or below was considered significant. All pattern increased significantly over time. The trends of the
statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 10.0 incidence of resistance patterns confirmed the trends of the
software (Stata, College Station, TX, USA). proportions (Fig. 2). However, incidence trends of the MDR
and XDR patterns did not reach the threshold for statistical
significance. Of note, the global incidence of P. aeruginosa
Results infections per 1,000 patient-days was stable during the survey
(Spearman’s ρ=0.004, p=0.189). Identical trends were ob-
We analysed the resistance data for 58,810 P. aeruginosa served for bloodstream isolates of P. aeruginosa (data not
isolates collected during the 11-year surveillance period at shown).
the six participating hospitals. After the exclusion of incom- The proportions of isolates resistant to fluoroquinolones,
plete data and duplicates, 34,065 isolates (2,404 of which aminoglycosides and monobactams decreased significantly

b = 0.038, p<0.001

WT

b = -0.019, p=0.001

b = -0.011, p=0.063
MDR
b = -0.023, p=0.077
XDR

Fig. 2 Trends in the crude incidence (per 1,000 patient-days) of the solid grey line resistant (R) pattern, dashed black line multidrug-resistant
different antibiotic resistance patterns defined by the ECDC for (MDR) pattern, solid black line extensively drug-resistant (XDR) pattern.
P. aeruginosa isolates from six French hospitals between 2001 and The regression coefficient (b) was calculated in the negative binomial
2011 (n=34,065). Dashed grey line wild-type (WT) resistance pattern, regression test
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

Fig. 3 Trends in the antibiotic


resistance (%) of the different
antibiotics for P. aeruginosa
isolated at six French hospitals
between 2001 and 2011 (n=
34,065). Form the top to the
bottom (proportion in 2011): thin
solid grey line monobactam
resistance proportion, dashed
grey line fluoroquinolone
resistance proportion, dotted
black line carbapenem resistance
proportion, bold solid black line
penicillin resistance proportion,
bold solid grey line
aminoglycoside resistance
proportion, dashed black line
cephalosporin resistance
proportion

over time, whereas the proportion of isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin were updated in 2010. The EARS-Net data
carbapenems increased, and those of isolates resistant to pen- showed an increase in the proportion of isolates non-
icillins and cephalosporins remain stable (Fig. 3). susceptible to ceftazidime from 8 % in 2008 to 17 % in
2009. Our results suggest that this increase might be more
likely to reflect a change in the breakpoints used to define
Discussion susceptibility than a real change in P. aeruginosa antimicro-
bial drug resistance rates. Moreover, caution is required more
Our data for trends in resistance to fluoroquinolones, amino- generally when considering the trends reported by the EARS-
glycosides and monobactams are consistent with the reported Net. For instance, although “trend figures” indicated an in-
decrease in resistance to fluoroquinolone and gentamicin in crease in resistance to fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and
Canada [15], the USA [16] and Europe [17]. The decline in combined resistance, an asterisk was used to indicate “signif-
resistance to fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides between icant trends in the overall data that were not supported by data
2001 and 2011 presumably resulted from a decrease in the use from laboratories consistently reporting for all 4 years”.
of these compounds observed during this period in French In contrast to these discrepancies, the increase in the pro-
hospitals [18], but we did not collect data on the antimicrobial portion of isolates resistant to carbapenems that we observed
consumption of the six participating hospitals to confirm this between 2001 and 2011 is consistent with that reported by the
hypothesis. EARS-Net. This concordance probably reflects the lack of
However, our data are not consistent with those of the change in the breakpoints used to interpret EARS-net data for
EARS-Net for all antimicrobial classes, with the exception carbapenems. The growing proportion of isolates displaying
of carbapenems. This Europe-wide surveillance network re- carbapenem resistance undoubtedly reflects the increase in
ported increasing proportions of P. aeruginosa isolates resis- carbapenem use in French hospitals during this period [18].
tant to all the antimicrobial agents tested (ceftazidime, Our study is undoubtedly less representative than the
piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, aminoglycosides and French nationwide EARS-Net survey. However, we had the
carbapenems) and increasing proportions of isolates with advantage of collecting raw resistance data and we were able
combined resistance, between 2008 and 2011, in France [9]. apply the same criteria for their interpretation throughout the
In the 2011 report, the EARS-Net coordinators pointed out period concerned. Moreover, we included approximately
“that the use of microbiological breakpoints may change over 3,000 non-duplicate isolates per year, whereas the EARS-net
time, when breakpoint protocols are updated or changed. As surveillance included about 1,000 isolates per year.
data on quantitative measures (i.e. zone diameters in disk In conclusion, our study suggests that, with the exception
diffusion tests or MIC values) are not provided by all partic- of carbapenem resistance, resistance of P. aeruginosa to anti-
ipating laboratories, only the reported S, I, and R results are microbial drugs is generally decreasing. This observation
considered for the analyses”. The criteria defining susceptibil- contrasts with the large number of reports of the occurrence
ity to ceftazidime and cefepime in the French recommenda- [19–22] or international spread of multidrug-resistant
tions were updated in 2008 and those for susceptibility to P. aeruginosa, producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

(mostly metallo-β-lactamase) [8, 23]. These emerging mech- 10. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
(EUCAST 2013). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and
anisms did not begin to affect the antimicrobial drug resistance
zone diameters. Version 3.0. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/
of P. aeruginosa in France until 2011, but careful monitoring media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/Breakpoint_table_
of resistance trends is required. Furthermore, antibiotic man- v_31.pdf
agement policies focusing on carbapenem use should be im- 11. Observatoire National de l’Epidémiologie de la Résistance
Bactérienne aux Antibiotiques. http://www.onerba.org/
plemented in French hospitals, particularly in the face of
12. Comité de l’antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie.
recent increases in the incidence of multidrug-resistant Recommandations 2012. www.sfm-microbiologie.org/UserFiles/file/
Enterobacteriaceae. CASFM/CASFM_2012.pdf
13. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME,
Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B,
Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of Paterson DL, Rice LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber
interest. JT, Monnet DL (2012) Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant
and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for
interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol
Infect 18:268–281
References 14. Gales AC, Reis AO, Jones RN (2001) Contemporary assessment of
antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for polymyxin B and
colistin: review of available interpretative criteria and quality control
1. Kerr KG, Snelling AM (2009) Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a formida- guidelines. J Clin Microbiol 39:183–190
ble and ever-present adversary. J Hosp Infect 73:338–344 15. Lagace-Wiens PR, Adam HJ, Low DE, Blondeau JM, Baxter MR,
2. Livermore DM (2002) Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resis- Denisuik AJ, Nichol KA, Walkty A, Karlowsky JA, Mulvey MR,
tance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: our worst nightmare? Clin Infect Hoban DJ, Zhanel GG (2013) Trends in antibiotic resistance over
Dis 34:634–640 time among pathogens from Canadian hospitals: results of the
3. Hocquet D, Plesiat P, Dehecq B, Mariotte P, Talon D, Bertrand X CANWARD study 2007–11. J Antimicrob Chemother 68 [Suppl
(2010) Nationwide investigation of extended-spectrum beta- 1]:i23–i29
lactamases, metallo-beta-lactamases, and extended-spectrum 16. Master RN, Clark RB, Karlowsky JA, Ramirez J, Bordon JM (2011)
oxacillinases produced by ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas Analysis of resistance, cross-resistance and antimicrobial combina-
aeruginosa strains in France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54: tions for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from 1997 to 2009. Int J
3512–3515 Antimicrob Agents 38:291–295
4. Cholley P, Thouverez M, Hocquet D, van der Mee-Marquet N, Talon 17. Bertrand X, Dowzicky MJ (2012) Antimicrobial susceptibility
D, Bertrand X (2011) Most multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas among gram-negative isolates collected from intensive care units
aeruginosa isolates from hospitals in eastern France belong to a in North America, Europe, the Asia-Pacific Rim, Latin America,
few clonal types. J Clin Microbiol 49:2578–2583 the Middle East, and Africa between 2004 and 2009 as part of
5. Milan O, Debroize L, Bertrand X, Plesiat P, Valentin AS, Quentin R, the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial. Clin Ther 34:
Van der Mee-Marquet N (2013) Difficult-to-detect carbapenem- 124–137
resistant IMP13-producing P. aeruginosa: experience feedback 18. Cavalié P (2012) Trends in antibiotic use in France in 2000–2010.
concerning a cluster of urinary tract infections at a surgical clinic in Bull Epidemiol Hebd (Paris) 42–43:480–483
France. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2(1):12 19. Cornaglia G, Giamarellou H, Rossolini GM (2011) Metallo-beta-
6. Giske CG, Libisch B, Colinon C, Scoulica E, Pagani L, Fuzi M, lactamases: a last frontier for beta-lactams? Lancet Infect Dis 11:
Kronvall G, Rossolini GM (2006) Establishing clonal relationships 381–393
between VIM-1-like metallo-beta-lactamase-producing 20. Fournier D, Richardot C, Muller E, Robert-Nicoud M, Llanes C,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from four European countries by Plesiat P, Jeannot K (2013) Complexity of resistance mechanisms to
multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol 44:4309–4315 imipenem in intensive care unit strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
7. Koh TH, Khoo CT, Tan TT, Arshad MA, Ang LP, Lau LJ, Hsu LY, J Antimicrob Chemother 68:1772–1780
Ooi EE (2010) Multilocus sequence types of carbapenem-resistant 21. Ranellou K, Kadlec K, Poulou A, Voulgari E, Vrioni G, Schwarz S,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Singapore carrying metallo-beta- Tsakris A (2012) Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates of
lactamase genes, including the novel bla(IMP-26) gene. J Clin the international clonal complex 11 carrying the blaPER-1 extended-
Microbiol 48:2563–2564 spectrum beta-lactamase gene in Greece. J Antimicrob Chemother
8. Edelstein MV, Skleenova EN, Shevchenko OV, D’Souza JW, 67:357–361
Tapalski DV, Azizov IS, Sukhorukova MV, Pavlukov RA, Kozlov 22. Pournaras S, Kock R, Mossialos D, Mellmann A, Sakellaris V,
RS, Toleman MA, Walsh TR (2013) Spread of extensively resistant Stathopoulos C, Friedrich AW, Tsakris A (2013) Detection of a
VIM-2-positive ST235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Belarus, phylogenetically distinct IMP-type metallo-beta-lactamase, IMP-
Kazakhstan, and Russia: a longitudinal epidemiological and clinical 35, in a CC235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the Dutch-
study. Lancet Infect Dis 13:867–876 German border region (Euregio). J Antimicrob Chemother 68:
9. Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe: Annual Report of 1271–1276
the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network 23. Santella G, Pollini S, Docquier JD, Mereuta AI, Gutkind G, Rossolini
(EARS-Net) 2011. http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/ GM, Radice M (2010) Intercontinental dissemination of IMP-13-
publications/antimicrobial-resistance-surveillance-europe-2011.pdf, producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa belonging in sequence type
Stockholm: European Centres for Disease Control 621. J Clin Microbiol 48:4342–4343

You might also like