Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Allocation
Allocation
com
Allocation
management & global
ATP for an advanced
memory manufacturer
Executive Summary
Sales Order Scheduling for an advanced memory manufacturer was performed using the
GATP components of allocation and rules-based availability check. Customer allocations
could be at a monthly or weekly level, which was determined by the MRP type. Allocation
check was performed at two levels i.e. Customer Entity and Customer Sales division.
Certain products such as Solid State Drive (SSD) would have customer allocation and also
the capacity allocation of the assembly line. After the allocation check was successful,
then the ATP was carried out using RBA. Customization was built-in during RBA check to
check the week-wise supply. Standard GATP check results would have multiple schedule
lines for the sales order ATP check. The customer wanted to suppress multiple schedule
lines. A lot of customization was built in ECC and APO to handle this business requirement.
The Customer
The advanced memory manufacturer technology designs and builds some of the world’s
most advanced memory and semiconductor technologies for products from computing,
networking, and server applications, to mobile, embedded, consumer, automotive, and
industrial designs.
CASE STUDY
• ATP model should consist of product and customer allocation, capacity allocation as
well as rules based product substitutions.
• Standard GATP check confirmation results would have multiple schedule lines but the
need was to suppress multiple schedule lines and have only one schedule line per
confirmation.
• Order re-scheduling had to be performed with options for order selection and sorting
of line items.
• Delivery scheduling need not pass through GATP check but would need validation of
the customer requirements and the rules i.e. product substitutions.
• Establish following ATP metrics:
–– On-time delivery performance—confirm to the promised dates
–– Demand and supply match
–– Counter delivery failures due to attributes mismatch
HCL Solution
• SAP APO SNP (Supply Planning)
• SAP ECC (ERP)
• SAP APO DP (Demand Planning)
• Legacy system for in house WIP
• Serus third-party system for subcontractor location WIP
• Available to promise using SAP GATP
CASE STUDY
–– After the allocation check is successful, ATP check is performed using rules based
product substitutions. ATP check has stock, receipts and requirements. Product
with allocation modeling will have the receipts planned from CTM, WIP and in-transit.
Receipts will be ignored for products with weekly allocation models. A custom
application is built in ECC for maintaining rules. This application creates product
substitutions, rules and rule determination records in APO through a rule Job. Rule
identification (Rule-id) is passed to APO through the field catalogue user exit and this
is utilized for identifying the substitutions that are relevant for the customer.
–– Availability check is limited to check supplies by week through a customized solution.
Standard GATP check confirmation results will have multiple schedule lines. The
need is to suppress multiple schedule lines and have only one schedule line per
confirmation. Since there are multiple schedule lines, we create them as individual
line items per schedule line confirmation. This functionality is achieved by enabling
core-modification in ECC.
–– Order rescheduling is performed using GATP BOP component. Customization is built
for order selection and sorting of line items. Back-order processing is performed on
daily basis for confirmed line items. Weekly BOP takes care of sales order lines i.e.
items with and without confirmation.
–– Delivery scheduling does not pass through GATP check in APO. Instead a
customization application is built in ECC which validates the customer requirements
and the rules, i.e. product substitutions.
Judged
Demand Demand
Forecast Allocation
APO DP
Planning
Demand Supply Plan
Feedback
Capacity Allocated
Demand
Allocation
Management
ATP Consumed
Plan ATP
CASE STUDY
• Order back log having the orders with allocation confirmation and also the supply
confirmation
• For large orders, commit updates done via standard back-order processing and native
real-time updates of the sales order via the core interface
• Change in orders does not wipe out the previous confirmation but merely update the
CRD or requested quantity triggering a review process
• Integration with ECC for master and transaction data
• ATP metrics to measure:
–– On-time delivery performance—confirm to original promise dates
–– Demand and supply match
–– Countered delivery failures due to attributes mismatch
Contact: iSCM@hcl.com
Hello there! I am an Ideapreneur. I believe that sustainable business outcomes are driven by relationships nurtured through
values like trust, transparency and flexibility. I respect the contract, but believe in going beyond through collaboration, applied
innovation and new generation partnership models that put your interest above everything else. Right now 100,000 Ideapreneurs
are in a Relationship Beyond the Contract™ with 500 customers in 31 countries. How can I help you?