Journal of Medical Ultrasound (2016) 24, 3e12

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect
Chinese Taipei Society of
Ultrasound in Medicine
journal homepage: www.jmu-online.com

REVIEW ARTICLE

Ultrasonography of Uterine Leiomyomas

Sabrina Q. Rashid 1*, Yi-Hong Chou 2*, Chui-Mei Tiu 2

1
Bangladesh Specialized Hospital, Department of Radiology and Imaging, and University of Science and
Technology Chittagong, Dhaka, Bangladesh, and 2 Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General
Hospital and National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

Received 2 February 2012; accepted 23 December 2015

Available online 20 April 2016

KEYWORDS Abstract Leiomyomas or myomas of the uterus, also known as a fibroid uterus, are the
fibroids, most common tumors of the uterus. They are benign neoplasms of smooth muscle origin with
ultrasound, various degrees of fibrous connective tissue. These tumors can develop in any part of the
variants female genital tract where there is smooth muscle or fibrous tissue, even in the ovary, broad
ligament, and vagina. They need to be differentiated from adenomyosis and intracavitary
polyps. They mostly remain asymptomatic but sometimes they cause significant morbidity.
In such situations, hysterectomy or other surgical intervention is indicated. On ultrasonog-
raphy, most uterine leiomyomas typically appear as well-defined, solid masses. Their echo-
genicity is usually similar to that of the myometrium, but sometimes they are hypoechoic.
They often show some posterior acoustic shadowing. Variants of leiomyomas occur when
they undergo cystic degeneration, hyalinization, or calcification. In such situations, deter-
mining a diagnosis is sometimes difficult. Magnetic resonance imaging can be used in this sit-
uation for an accurate diagnosis.
ª 2016, Elsevier Taiwan LLC and the Chinese Taipei Society of Ultrasound in Medicine. This is
an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction

“The uterus is an organ that should bear something, if not a

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no financial and nonfi-
nancial conflicts of interest to declare.
* Correspondence to: Sabrina Q. Rashid, Bangladesh Specialized
Hospital, 88 DOHS Banani, Dhaka Cantonment, Dhaka 1206,
Bangladesh. Yi-Hong Chou, 201, Department of Radiology, Taipei
Veterans General Hospital and National Yang Ming University,
Section 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
E-mail addresses: drsabrinaq@yahoo.com (S.Q. Rashid),
yhchou7@gmail.com (Y.-H. Chou).
child, then a fibroid”dso goes a saying. It is the most
common tumor of the uterus and all pelvic organs. Uterine
myomas or fibroids occur in 20e50% of women and repre-
sent the most frequent gynecologic tumor [1,2]. They are
more frequent and occur at a younger age in the black
population. Depending on their location and size, they may
or may not be symptomatic [3].
Ultrasonography (USG) is usually the first method used
to examine the female pelvis. Both transabdominal scan
(TAS) and transvaginal scan (TVS) should ideally be

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmu.2015.12.006
0929-6441/ª 2016, Elsevier Taiwan LLC and the Chinese Taipei Society of Ultrasound in Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC
BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
4 S.Q. Rashid et al.
Figure 1 Submucosal and degenerative myoma on the
transvaginal scan. The mass is indicated by the arrows.
performed. A TAS is very difficult to perform in obese
patients and gives less information. For the diagnosis of
small leiomyomas, TVS is more sensitive; it is also sensi-
tive in detecting leiomyomas when the uterus is retro-
flexed and/or retroverted. A TAS is generally superior to
TVS in diagnosing a fundal myoma; however, TVS occa-
sionally helps to exclude a fundal myoma that was indi-
cated by TAS. In TVS, a large or pedunculated myoma may
lie outside the field of view of a high frequency probe with
short focal length. Ultrasonography is highly operator-
dependent; therefore, in expert hands, the location of the
leiomyomas and 5-mm small fibroids can be detected by
TVS. Leiomyomas of the uterus are common tumors and
previous observations and reports have resulted in well-
recognized diagnostic categories, based on histological or
gross differences [4].
Figure 2 Numerous small intramural leiomyomas (M) on the transvaginal scan.
Symptoms and signs
The symptoms and signs of a leiomyoma depend on its size
and location. Submucosal myomas (Figure 1) may erode
into the endometrial cavity and cause irregular or heavy
bleeding, which may lead to anemia. Fertility may be
affected by submucosal or intramural leiomyomas (Figures
2 and 3), which by their location may inhibit sperm
transport down the tube and prevent adequate implanta-
tion or cause recurrent miscarriages. Large cervical leio-
myomas (Figure 3) can prevent normal vaginal deliveries.
Large leiomyomas can cause symptoms by pressure effect
on adjacent organs such as the bladder (Figure 4), bowel,
and ligaments of the pelvis. They may cause dysmenor-
rhea, dysuria, and constipation. Low back pain may be
because of pressure on pelvic ligaments or the lumbar
plexus. Acute pelvic pain may be caused by torsion or
necrosis of a previously asymptomatic leiomyoma. They
may be pedunculated and present as a separate pelvic
mass. Cervical leiomyomas may pedunculate into the
endocervical canal, where ulceration and hemorrhage are
common [3].
Location
A fibroid uterus is more correctly called a leiomyoma
because it arises from the smooth muscle of the uterine
wall. A leiomyoma is actually a mass of smooth muscle
proliferation in a whorled spherical configuration. They are
encapsulated by a pseudocapsule and separate easily from
the surrounding myometrium [3]. Leiomyomas also may
occur in extrauterine sites such as the fallopian tube, cer-
vix, vagina (Figure 5), or ligaments of the pelvis. However,
they are most common in the uterus.
Ultrasonography of Uterine Leiomyomas
Figure 3 An intramural leiomyoma (large arrows) and a large cervical leiomyoma (myo, small arrow) on the transvaginal scan.
Leiomyomas that occur in the uterine wall can be
submucosal, intramural, or subserosal (i.e., adjacent to
the endometrium) and can develop in the muscle layer or
just beneath the serosa. The tumor can also pedunculate
with a stalk connecting the uterus (Figures 6,7). Submu-
cosal leiomyomas are usually clearly visible and separate
from the endometrium on a TVS, but can be difficult to
differentiate from polyps (Figure 8). Hysterosonography is
a technique in which sterile saline is instilled into the
uterine cavity via a transcervical catheter while per-
forming a TVS. This method allows better visualization of
the endometrium and is more accurate than the tradi-
tional TVS in detecting submucosal leiomyomas and in
differentiating them from polyps [5].
Ultrasonography
Since the late 1970s, clinical ultrasonography has been the
“gold standard” of uterine imaging. The advent of TVS in
Figure 4 A longitudinal transabdominal scan of a largecervical
leiomyoma (arrows), which resulted in the patient’s inability to
empty the urinary bladder. U Z uterus; UB Z urinary bladder.
5
the 1980s solidified this position by providing a closer and
more accurate ultrasound (US) appraisal of the uterus.
Since the 1990s, improvements in computed tomography
(CT) and hysterosalphingography (HSG), and rapid de-
velopments in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have
allowed these modalities to complement the traditional
sonographic evaluation [4].
Leiomyomas or fibroids of the uterus are common neo-
plasms and most are the conventional type and therefore easy
to diagnose. Throughout the years, several histological sub-
types have been described. Their importance is largely
because of their resemblance in one or more aspects to leio-
myosarcoma and the obvious potential for misdiagnosis [4].
Most uterine leiomyomas appear as well-defined solid
masses. Their echogenicity is usually similar to the myo-
metrium, but sometimes the echogenicity is hypoechoic.
The tumors cause the uterus to become bulky or may
change the uterine contour and make it irregular (Figure 3).
Uterine leiomyomas often show some posterior acoustic
shadowing (Figure 3); this finding is more prominent in fi-
broids that have calcification (Figure 9).
Leiomyomas with cystic degeneration may have a com-
plex appearance (Figure 1). Color Doppler US typically
shows circumferential vascularity [6]; however, leiomyo-
mas that are necrotic or have undergone torsion will show a
lack of blood flow [7]. Transvaginal color Doppler US can be
used to study uterine blood flow and leiomyoma arterial
supply. The color Doppler US depiction of uterine vascu-
larity depends on several factors such as the sensitivity of
the scanner and the age and parity of the patient. In non-
medically suppressed women of childbearing age, myo-
metrial vessels and spiral vessels within the endometrium
during the luteal phase are present. Postmenopausal
women typically have a relatively hypovascular myome-
trium and endometrium [6]. Blood flow impedance
[expressed as the resistance index (RI)], pulsatility index
(PI), and blood velocity can be calculated. Increased blood
velocity and decreased RI and PI in both uterine arteries
occur in patients with uterine leiomyomas. The same
technique has been used to study blood flow in the main
6 S.Q. Rashid et al.

Figure 5 (A) Longitudinal and transverse transabdominal scans of a leiomyoma (mass) on the vaginal wall. (B) Longitudinal and
transverse transvaginal scans also show leiomyoma (the arrows indicate the mass) on the vaginal wall. UB Z urinary bladder.

arteries supplying identifiable leiomyomas. Diastolic flow in
these arteries is always present and increased in compari-
son to uterine artery blood flow. The difference in uterine
artery blood flow between patients with leiomyomas and
healthy volunteers is statistically significant and may have
predictable value in growth rate evaluation of a benign
uterine mass [8]. It may be that detecting hypervascularity
in combination with other sonographic findings can identify
undetermined uterine smooth muscle tumors that will
require additional diagnostic evaluation before treatment.
Combined gray-scale and color Doppler US may help
distinguish a uterine leiomyosarcoma from a leiomyoma [9].
A high vascularity score yielded high sensitivity (100%) but a
low positive predictive value (PPV; 19%). Considering only
the presence of marked central vascularity achieved a
sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 96% with a 44% PPV.

Figure 6 Longitudinal and transverse transabdominal scans show a subserosal leiomyoma (arrow) on the fundus. UB Z urinary
bladder.
Ultrasonography of Uterine Leiomyomas
Figure 7 Pedunculated leiomyomas. (A) The tumor (arrow) has
a thin stalk (arrowhead) connecting it to the uterine fundus
(longitudinal TAS image). (B) The TAS image shows a leiomyoma
7
Adding the diameter  8 cm or the characteristics of a
single myometrial tumor to the presence of central vascu-
larity, the PPV and K index improved (PPV, 60%; K index,
59%). When the diameter was  8 cm, marked central
vascularity and presence of cystic degeneration were
considered together for the diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma.
The sensitivity decreased (50%), but specificity (99%), PPV
(57%), and the K index (56%) remained largely unchanged.
Diffuse leiomyomatosis is among the many variants of
uterine leiomyoma with an unusual growth pattern that has
been described [10]. This tumor, however, is characterized
by uterine enlargement that is symmetric, the result of
innumerable leiomyomatous nodules throughout the
myometrium.
Another morphologic variant of leiomyoma is intrave-
nous leiomyomatosis [11]; In this variant, the leiomyoma is
within vascular spaces that lie outside a leiomyoma, which
are often grossly visible. A newer relatively rare variant,
the cotyledonoid leiomyoma [12], has been the subject of
several recent case reports [13,14]. This entity is named
because of its dramatic placenta-like gross appearance,
which belies its otherwise benign nature. Leiomyomas of
the uterus are often accompanied by degenerative changes
such as hyalinization, myxoid change, and calcification
[15].
Edema within these tumors is also another type of
degenerative process which, when less severe, is often
referred to as hydropic change [16] or hydropic degenera-
tion [17]. Cyst formation can be an exaggeration of this
process, and is associated with increasing amounts of
edematous fluid in some tumors. Cystic change itself is a
recognized degenerative phenomenon [4].
Most variant leiomyomas have been reported in patients
in the latter phase of their reproductive life or in the
perimenopausal period. They are entirely benign and the
patient’s prognosis is good [4].
Most uterine leiomyomas are benign, although some
uterine leiomyosarcomas may arise from a subset of leio-
myomas [18]. Only approximately 0.23e0.7% of apparently
benign uterine leiomyomas are actually leiomyosarcomas,
based on pathological examination [19,20].
Large leiomyomas can occasionally obstruct the ureters
and cause secondary hydronephrosis. Therefore, an US ex-
amination should include the urinary tract whenever a large
pelvic mass is identified. The diagnosis of uterine leio-
myomas on US is usually reasonably straightforward,
although focal adenomyosis can mimic a leiomyoma and a
pedunculated uterine leiomyoma can sometimes be
mistaken for an adnexal mass [21] (Figure 7A). When there
is doubt about the origin of a pelvic mass at US, further
evaluation with MRI should be performed.
Three-dimensional US (3D US) is a more recently devel-
oped technique. The 3D technique can be available for
(arrow) with a relatively thick stalk (arrowheads) connecting it to
the uterine fundus. (C) The TVS and (D) CT scan of a pedunculated
calcific leiomyoma (arrow). Another small leiomyoma is visible
(cursors). The patient also has ascites due to peritoneal dialysis.
CT Z computed tomography; TAS Z transabdominal scan;
TVS Z transvaginal scan; UT Z uterus.
8 S.Q. Rashid et al.

and in the coronal, transverse, and sagittal planes

Figure 8 The transvaginal scan shows a polyp (arrows) in the
endometrial canal and multiple intramural leiomyomas (M).
transabdominal or transvaginal scans. Three-dimensional
US can provide a multiplanar display of the anatomy of the
uterus. The uterus is displayed in the standard orientation,
(Figure 10). What is coronal on the 2D display is actually
transverse to the uterus. The actual coronal plane on 3D
(i.e., the C-plane) is coronal to the uterus, not to the fe-
male pelvis. In the 3D display of the uterus, the plane of
acquisition is usually provided in addition to the multi-
planar display in the 3D presentation. The US operator
needs to rotate the volume to see the standard plane [i.e.,
transverse, sagittal, and coronal (C-plane)]. The display
varies, depending on equipment and operator preference.
Sagittal acquisition is generally superior to coronal acqui-
sition. If the uterus is too large to get into one volume with
the sagittal plane, the transverse plane can be used. Three-
dimensional TVS is generally superior to 3D TAS [22]. Breath
holding can improve data acquisition. During scanning, the
orientation issue is very important, and the identification of
the cervix and the right and left side is needed. Three-
dimensional US is very good for volume measurement of
uterine leiomyomas and vascularity assessment by using
vascularity index or vascularity volume display [23]
(Figure 11). In addition to the multiplanar mode, the vol-
ume data may be also utilized for a multislice mode,
rendered display mode, thick slice mode, or other modes

Figure 9 (A) Leiomyoma (arrows) with calcific changes presents as bright spots within the mass on the transvaginal scan. (B)
Transabdominal scan of curvilinear calcification in the periphery of a leiomyoma (arrows) in a pregnant female. F Z fetus.
Ultrasonography of Uterine Leiomyomas
Figure 10 A leiomyoma (arrows) on three-dimensional (3D)
ultrasonography presents as a hypoechoic mass in the cervical
region (TAS). (A) The original raw image on the sagittal scan.
(B) The 3D image. TAS Z transabdominal scan.
(e.g., invert mode). In patients with a distorted endome-
trium on 2D US, 3D hysterosonography may readily
demonstrate submucosal leiomyomas, help distinguish a
pseudopolyp or an endometrial polyp, and allow for accu-
rate assessment of intrauterine abnormalities [23,24].
Hysterosonography is an important addition to TVS in the
accurate delineation of submucosal and intracavitary leio-
myomas [25]. A 3D TVS can be combined with saline
instillation into the uterine cavity to complement diag-
nostic hysteroscopy for the assessment of a submucosal
leiomyoma. There is a good overall agreement between
diagnostic hysteroscopy and TVS in the diagnosis of sub-
mucosal leiomyomas and in the assessment of myometrial
extension of fibroids [25,26]. Three-dimensional saline
contrast sonohysterography may provide even more infor-
mation than conventional 3-D TVS in this aspect [27].
Computed tomography
CT is not the choice for the characterization of pelvic
masses. A CT scan is limited by the similar signal attenua-
tion by uterine fibroids and the normal myometrium.
Uterine fibroids are often seen incidentally on CT scans that
are performed for other reasons. The typical finding is a
bulky, irregular uterus or a mass in continuity within or with
9
the uterus. Calcification in the fibroids can be detected by a
CT scan. Degenerated fibroids may appear complex and
contain areas of fluid attenuation. Calcification occurs in
approximately 4% of fibroids [28], and is typically dense and
amorphous. However, calcification can also be confined to
the periphery (Figure 8) of the fibroid when it is believed to
be secondary to thrombosed veins from previous red
degeneration [28]. Furthermore CT scan can demonstrate
secondary changes of the uterine fibroids such as degen-
eration, necrosis, and sacromatous transformation [29].
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred method
for accurately characterizing pelvic masses. It is more
sensitive than US in identifying uterine fibroids [30], it does
not involve the use of ionizing radiation, and it can
demonstrate the zones of the uterus very well. Submucosal,
intramural, and subserosal fibroids are well demonstrated,
and very small fibroids and cervical fibroids can be detected
by MRI. MRI sequences should include axial and sagittal T1W
and T2W images. Compared to the myometrium, non-
degenerated fibroids appear as well-defined low-signal in-
tensity masses on T2W images and as isointense on T1W
images [31].
Hysterosalpingography and sonohysterography
Hysterosalpingography (HSG) remains an important radio-
logic procedure in the investigation of infertility and is a
commonly performed examination because of recent ad-
vances in reproductive medicine. Hysterosalpingography
can demonstrate the morphology of the uterine cavity, the
lumen, and the patency of the fallopian tubes. Because of
the increased demand for HSG, physicians should be
familiar with the HSG technique and the interpretation of
HSG images.
After administering a radiopaque contrast medium
through the cervical canal, the uterine cavity, and the
patency of the fallopian tubes can be evaluated. A properly
performed HSG can detect the contour of the uterine cavity
and the width of the cervical canal. Further contrast me-
dium injection will outline the cornua isthmic and ampul-
lary portions of the tubes, and will show the degree of
spillage [32,33]. Most leiomyomas are diagnosed by TAS,
whereas submucosal leiomyomas are imaged as smooth
filling defects in the uterine cavity. Differential diagnosis of
a leiomyoma must include endometrial polyps or a possible
pregnancy. Small intramural leiomyomas do not distort the
endometrial cavity and are not visualized on HSG. Submu-
cosal leiomyomas can provoke smooth filling defects,
smooth muscle repression, or obstruction of the fallopian
tubes only if they are in the lateral walls of the uterus [32].
Distinguishing a submucous myoma from an endometrial
polyp is very important. Intracavitary fibroids tend to be
larger than the polyps, and homogeneous hyperechoic
masses in the uterine cavity observed by sonohysterography
(SHG) are highly suggestive of endometrial polyps [34],
Other studies using B-mode sonography suggest that a
hyperechoic polypoid lesion in the uterine cavity is char-
acteristic of an endometrial polyp. By contrast, the
10 S.Q. Rashid et al.

myometrial echogenicity of uterine fibroids tends to vary

(e.g., hypoechoic, isoechoic, hyperechoic, or mixed),
which may depend on the size and nature of the fibroid.
Thus, SHG may enhance the echogenicity in these intra-
cavitary masses of the uterus. A published study showed
homogeneous hyperechoic polypoid masses occur signifi-
cantly in patients with endometrial polyps. Another study
using SHG also demonstrated that most submucosal fibroids
were hypoechoic. Therefore, homogeneous hyperechoic
masses in the uterine cavity on SHG are highly suggestive of
endometrial polyps [35,36].

Rare types

Diffuse leiomyomatosis is a rare condition that consists of

diffuse involvement of the myometrium by innumerable
small leiomyomas, which result in symmetrical enlarge-
ment of the uterus. They are histologically benign, although
there may be dissemination through the peritoneal cavity
or occasionally metastasis to distant organs [28].
Lipoleiomyomas are rare fat-containing leiomyomas
with a reported prevalence of 0.005e0.2% [37]. They are
detected in 0.03e0.2% of hysterectomy specimens [38].
Lipoleiomyomas are benign and present with the same
symptoms as uterine leiomyomas. The most likely cause
may be fatty metamorphosis of the smooth muscle cells of a
leiomyoma [25,39]. An intensely hyperechoic, avascular
uterine mass is most often a fat-containing mass and is
virtually diagnostic of a lipomatous uterine tumor or lip-
oleiomyoma [40] (Figure 12). If pedunculated, they can be
mistaken on imaging for ovarian dermoids. As leiomyomas
enlarge, they can outgrow their blood supply and result in
various types of degeneration (e.g., hyaline, cystic, myx-
oid, or red degeneration) and dystrophic calcification [41].
Cystic degeneration, which occurs in w4% of leiomyomas,
may be an extreme sequelae of edema [42]. Fibroids typi-
cally have a characteristic ultrasonographic appearance,
although cystic degenerating fibroids can have variable
patterns and pose diagnostic challenges [43], especially
when a fibroid is an usually large cystic mass (Figure 13) or a
pedunculated leiomyoma masquerading as an adnexal
mass. Pedunculated leiomyomas should be considered in
the differential diagnosis of a multilocular and predomi-
nantly cystic adnexal mass.

Differential diagnosis

Leiomyosarcomas are malignant tumors of the uterus. They

may occasionally arise from a preexisting fibroid but usually
occur de novo [18]. The patient classically presents with a
pelvic mass that has had a recent or rapid increase in size
[19]. They are typically large, heterogeneous masses

conventional transabdominal scan image shows a hypoechoic

mass in the uterine body (arrows). (B) Based on 3D US volu-
metry, the tumor volume is 217.51 cm3. (C) Tumor vascularity
on 3D US obtained by power Doppler US. The right lower image
Figure 11 The tumor volume, tumor vascularity, and
shows 3D power Doppler angiography. (D) The vascularity index
vascularity index in a leiomyoma (arrows), assessed by using
(VI) of the leiomyoma is 2.994 (flow index Z 26.251, vascu-
three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D US). (A) The
larization flow index Z 0.786).
Ultrasonography of Uterine Leiomyomas 11

Figure 12 An intensely hyperechoic uterine mass (large ar-

rows) on the transvaginal scan is a fat-containing mass (i.e., a
lipoleiomyoma). Another submucosal leiomyoma is present
(small arrows) and associated with the distortion of the
endometrial echoes (arrowheads).

containing areas of hemorrhage. They usually have more ill-

defined, irregular margins, compared to benign uterine
leiomyomas [16]. Combined gray-scale and color Doppler
US may help distinguish uterine leiomyosarcoma from
leiomyoma [9].
Adenomyosis is the ectopic endometrial tissue within the
myometrium. The US findings are relatively nonspecific.
Sonographic features used in the diagnosis of adenomyosis
consisted of two factors or more of the following: a mottled
inhomogeneous myometrial texture, globular uterine
enlargement, uterine wall thickening, small cystic spaces
Figure 13 Cystic fibroid. (A) The sagittal scan of the lower
within the myometrium, and a “shaggy” indistinct endo-
abdomen shows a large nearly completely cystic fibroid uterus
metrial stripe. A MRI scan may be helpful because leio-
(arrows) that measures 12 cm  10 cm and mimics a huge
myomas tend to be round, well-defined, encapsulated
gestational sac. It is in the body of the uterus of an unmarried
masses. Adenomyosis is a poorly demarcated or diffuse area
25-year-old woman with regular but very heavy periods and
without distinct margins or shape [44].
dysmenorrhea. (B) The transverse scan shows a solid compo-
Endometrial polyps typically appear as pedunculated
nent, 57 mm thick (arrows), that resembles placental tissue on
endometrial masses and will usually demonstrate an intact
one side of the cystic fibroid uterus. CX Z uterine cervix;
overlying endometrial stripe. For differentiation from a
U Z uterus; UB Z urinary bladder.
submucosal leiomyomas, HSG can be used.
A pedunculated subserosal leiomyoma can sometimes be
mistaken for an ovarian tumor. At times, a correct diagnosis Acknowledgments
is determined only at the time of surgery.
Myometrial contractions can be mistaken for uterine fi-
The authors would like to thank Ms. Chih-Ping Chiu, senior
broids. However, the contractions are transient, and
research assistant, for her excellent assistance in the
therefore the masses will disappear on subsequent scans.
preparation of this article.

Conclusion
References
Leiomyomas are the most common tumors of the uterus and
pelvis. They are benign but can cause significant morbidity.
They may be detected incidentally when performing ul-
trasonography for other reasons and are usually easily
recognizable. However, degenerate fibroids can have an
unusual echotexture. Knowledge of the various appear-
ances of fibroids enables an accurate diagnosis and proper
treatment. They are mostly diagnosed by ultrasonography;
however, MRI can be more accurate.
[1] Clarke-Pearson DL, Dawood MY. Benign diseases of the uterus:
leiomyomas, adenomyosis, hyperplasia and polyps. In: Clarke-
Pearson DL, Dawood MY, editors. Green’s gynecology essen-
tials of clinical practice. Boston (MA): Little Brown and Co;
1990.
[2] Entman SS. Uterine leiomyoma and adenomyosis. In:
Jones HW, Wentz AC, Burnett LS, editors. Novak’s textbook of
gynecology. 11th ed. Baltimore, MD, USA: Williams and Wil-
kins; 1988. p. 443.
12
[3] Hall DB, Yoder IC. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterus. In:
Callen PW, editor. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gyne-
cology. 3rd ed. India: WB Saunders Co; 1997. p. 603.
[4] Coard K, Plummer J. Massive multilocular cystic leiomyoma of
the uterus: an extreme example of hydropic degeneration.
South Med J 2007;100:309e12.
[5] Cicinelli E, Romano F, Anastasio PS, et al. Transabdominal
sonohysteroscopy, transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy
in the evaluation of submucous fibroids. Obstet Gynecol 1995;
85:42e7.
[6] Fleischer AC. Color Doppler sonography of uterine disorders.
Ultrasound Q 2003;19:179e89.
[7] Roy C, Bierry G, El Ghali S, et al. Acute torsion of uterine
leiomyoma: CT features. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:120e3.
[8] Kurjak A, Kupesic-Urek S, Miric D. The assessment of benign
uterine tumor vascularization by transvaginal color Doppler.
Ultrasound Med Biol 1992;18:645e9.
[9] Exacoustos C, Romanini ME, Amadio A, et al. Can gray-scale
and color Doppler sonography differentiate between uterine
leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma? J Clin Ultrasound 2007;35:
449e57.
[10] Clement PB, Young RH. Diffuse leiomyomatosis of the uterus:
a report of four cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1987;6:322e30.
[11] Norris HJ, Parmley T. Mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. V.
Intravenous leiomyomatosis. A clinical and pathologic study of
14 cases. Cancer 1975;36:2164e78.
[12] Roth LM, Reed RJ, Sternberg WH. Cotyledonoid dissecting
leiomyoma of the uterus. The Sternberg tumor. Am J Surg
Pathol 1996;20:1455e61.
[13] Kim MJ, Park YK, Cho JH. Cotyledonoid dissecting leiomyoma
of the uterus: a case report and review of the literature. J
Korean Med Sci 2002;17:840e4.
[14] Cheuk W, Chan JK, Liu JY. Cotyledonoid leiomyoma: a benign
uterine tumor with alarming gross appearance. Arch Pathol
Lab Med 2002;126:210e3.
[15] Zaloudek C, Hendrickson MR. Mesenchymal tumors of the
uterus. In: Kurman RJ, editor. Blaustein’s pathology of the
female genital tract. 5th ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2002.
p. 561e615.
[16] Hendrickson MR, Kemson RL. Surgical pathology of the uterine
corpus. In: Bennington J, editor. Major problems in pathology.
Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders; 1980. p. 473e84.
[17] Clement PB, Young RH, Scully RE. Diffuse, perinodular, and
other patterns of hydropic degeneration within and adjacent
to uterine leiomyomas. Problems in differential diagnosis. Am
J Surg Pathol 1992;16:26e32.
[18] Walker CL, Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids: the elephant in the
room. Science 2005;308:1589e92.
[19] Parker WH, FuYS Berek JS. Uterine sarcoma in patients
operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing
leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:414e8.
[20] Leibsohn S, d’Ablaing G, Mishell DR, et al. Leiomyosarcoma in
a series of hysterectomies performed for presumed uterine
leiomyomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:968e74. discus-
sion, 974e976.
[21] Weinreb JC, Barkoff ND, Megibow A, et al. The value of MR
imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic
masses when sonography is indeterminate. AJR Am J Roent-
genol 1990;154:295e9.
[22] Coyne L, Jayaprakasan K, Raine-Fenning N. 3D ultrasound in
gynecology and reproductive medicine. Womens Health (Lond
Engl) 2008;4:501e16.
[23] Makris N, Kalmantis K, Skartados N, et al. Three-dimensional
hysterosonography versus hysteroscopy for the detection of
S.Q. Rashid et al.
intracavitary uterine abnormalities. Int J Gynaecol Obstet
2007;97:6e9.
[24] Muniz CJ, Fleischer AC, Donnelly EF, et al. Three-dimensional
color Doppler sonography and uterine artery arteriography of
fibroids. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:129e33.
[25] Salim R, Lee C, Davies A, et al. A comparative study of three-
dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography and diagnostic
hysteroscopy for the classification of submucous fibroids. Hum
Reprod 2005;20:253e7.
[26] Sylvestre C, Child TJ, Tulandi T, et al. A prospective study to
evaluate the efficacy of two and three dimensional sonohys-
terography in women with intrauterine lesions. Fertil Steril
2003;79:1222e5.
[27] Mavrelos D, Naftalin J, Hoo W, et al. Preoperative assessment
of submucous fibroids by three-dimensional saline contrast
sonohysterography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:350e4.
[28] Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I, et al. Unusual appearances of
uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histo-
pathologic backgrounds. Radiographics 1999;19:S131e5.
[29] Becker E, Lev-Toaff AS, Kaufman EP, et al. The added value of
transvaginal sonohysterography over transvaginal sonography
alone in women with known or suspected leiomyoma. J Ul-
trasound Med 2002;21:237e47.
[30] Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, et al. Accuracy of magnetic
resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the
diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas. Am
J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:409e15.
[31] Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. CT and MRI of uterine sar-
comas and their mimickers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:
1369e74.
[32] Simpson Jr WL, Beitia LG, Mester J. Hysterosalpingography: a
reemerging study. Radiographics 2006;26:419e31.
[33] Eng CW, Tang PH, Ong CL. Hysterosalpingography: current
applications. Singapore Med J 2007;48:368e73.
[34] Tamura-Sadamori R, Emoto M, Naganuma Y, et al. The sono-
hysterographic difference in submucosal uterine fibroids and
endometrial polyps treated by hysteroscopic surgery. J Ul-
trasound Med 2007;26:941e6.
[35] Lane BF, Wong-You-Cheong JJ. Imaging of endometrial pa-
thology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52:57e72.
[36] Yang T, Pandya A, Marcal L, et al. Sonohysterography: prin-
ciples, technique and role in diagnosis of endometrial pa-
thology. World J Radiol 2013;5:81e7.
[37] Maebayashi T, Imai K, Takekawa Y, et al. Radiologic features
of uterine lipoleiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:
162e5.
[38] Avritscher R, Iyer RB, Ro J, et al. Lipoleiomyoma of the uterus.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:856.
[39] Prieto A, Crespo C, Pardo A, et al. Uterine lipoleiomyomas: US
and CT findings. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:655e7.
[40] Dhillon GS, Datta V, Voci S. Uterine lipoleiomyoma. Ultrasound
Q 2011;27:133e4.
[41] Prayson RA, Hart WR. Pathologic considerations of uterine
smooth muscle tumors. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995;
22:637e57.
[42] Mayer DP, Shipilov V. Ultrasonography and magnetic reso-
nance imaging of uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North
Am 1995;22:667e725.
[43] Aydin C, Eris S, Yalçin Y, et al. A giant cystic leiomyoma
mimicking an ovarian malignancy. Int J Surg Case Rep 2013;4:
1010e2.
[44] Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, et al. Enlarged uterus: differ-
entiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR im-
aging. Radiology 1989;171:531e4.