Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Motion
Motion
__________________________________________
)
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. 1:18-cv-1375 RDM
)
RYAN ZINKE, in his official capacity as )
Secretary of the U.S. Department of the )
Interior, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
Defendants respectfully request a stay of proceedings in this case until January 31, 2019.
1. On April 9, 2018, Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity submitted a notice of intent
to sue to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for its alleged failure to timely designate
critical habitat for the spring pygmy sunfish, which was listed as a threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) on October 2, 2013. FWS responded by letter dated June 4,
2018, in which it indicated its intent to complete the critical habitat designation by January 31,
2019. The letter also stated that new information on a discovery of the sunfish in a new area
would require reopening of the proposed critical habitat designation for public comment.
2. On June 11, 2018, Plaintiff filed its complaint, alleging Defendants violated the ESA
and/or the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by missing the statutory deadline to designate
critical habitat for the spring pygmy sunfish. ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 50-54.
Case 1:18-cv-01375-RDM Document 8 Filed 08/24/18 Page 2 of 3
3. FWS is in the process of completing the critical habitat designation, and expects to
submit the final designation to the Office of the Federal Register by January 31, 2019.
4. FWS will promptly notify Plaintiff and the Court when FWS submits the final critical
5. If this action is stayed pursuant to this motion, this stay will expire upon FWS’s
submission to the Federal Register of the critical habitat designation, or on February 1, 2019,
whichever is sooner.
6. Upon FWS’s submission to the Office of the Federal Register of the final critical
habitat designation, the Parties will confer and, within 14 days, will file a joint status report
7. If FWS learns that it is unable to submit the final critical habitat designation by
January 31, 2019, Defendants’ counsel will promptly confer with Plaintiff’s counsel.
8. Counsel for Defendants has conferred with counsel for Plaintiff regarding this motion,
and counsel for Plaintiff has stated that Plaintiff does not oppose this motion.
For these reasons, Defendants request the Court stay all proceedings in this case to allow
FWS to complete the final critical habitat designation by January 31, 2019, and avoid expending
the Parties’ or the Court’s resources with potentially unnecessary filings. Landis v. North
American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 255 (1936) (“[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the
power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the cases on its docket with economy
of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.”).
JEFFREY H. WOOD
2
Case 1:18-cv-01375-RDM Document 8 Filed 08/24/18 Page 3 of 3