Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Benzoic acid – a new

additive for swine


by J. Broz and C. Paulus, DSM Nutritional Products Ltd, Animal Nu

B
enzoic acid and its salts have been intestine. Addition of benzoic acid to the
used for many years as preservative culture medium resulted in a dose
agents by the food industry, but in dependent decrease in the rate of popu-
some countries also as silage additives, lation change. All the doses tested fully
mainly due to their strong efficacy controlled coliform bacteria.
against various fungi and yeasts. This study clearly confirmed that ben-
In 2003, benzoic acid has been app- zoic acid was superior to the other
roved in the European Union as a feed organic acids when considering the bac-
additive for growing-finishing pigs at the tericidal effect in both stomach and
inclusion levels of 0.5-1.0% and includ- small intestinal contents.
ed into group M, acidity regulators. These results are confirming the results
Previous and current research revealed found in vivo by Maribo et al. (2000) – a
some surprising and very useful proper- study in piglets revealed a marked reduc-
ties of this organic acid, which may tion in the density and activity of the gas-
result in its application for multiple pur- tro-intestinal bacteria. Due to its limited
poses. The objective of this contribution
is to describe key properties of benzoic Organic Coliform Lactic acid
acid and to review some recent experi- acid bacteria bacteria
mental findings. (100 mM) (h-1) (h-1)
Dissociation of benzoic acid is strongly
pH dependent and in its undissociated Control 1.16 0.23
form it exhibits various antibacterial and Fumaric acid 1.39 -0.19
antifungal activities. Rahn and Conn Lactic acid 0.69 0.06
(1944) reported that the antimicrobial Propionic acid 0.07 0.18
effect of benzoic acid was nearly 100 Butyric acid -0.06 0.08
times as efficient in strongly acid solu- Formic acid -0.13 0.11
tions as in neutral ones. Benzoic acid -0.69 -0.19
The spectrum of activity includes
Table 2. Specific bacterial growth or death
mainly enterobacteria, Bacillus spp. and
rate in response to various organic acids
micrococci, but also various fungi and in swine small intestinal content at pH 5.5
yeasts. Its inhibitory action on yeasts and (according to Knarreborg et al., 2002).
fungi is the background for a long term
use of benzoic acid as the food preserva- solubility in water, absorption of benzoic
tive. In vitro antibacterial activity of ben- acid is much delayed when compared to
zoic acid is shown in Table 1. other organic acids. After the absorption,
Recently, Knarreborg et al. (2002) com- benzoic acid is metabolised in the liver
pared the antimicrobial effects of six dif- and converted into hippuric acid via
ferent organic acids (formic, propionic, conjugation with the amino acid glycine.
butyric, lactic, benzoic and fumaric acid) Increased excretion of hippuric acid
in swine stomach content (pH 4.5) and results in the direct acidification of swine
in small intestinal content (pH 5.5), using urine, which seems to be dose depen-
a specially developed in vitro methodol- dent.
ogy (see Table 2 and Table 3). Some years ago, den Brok et al. (1999)
Benzoic acid revealed a strong bacteri- monitored urinary pH, ammonia emis-
cidal effect on both coliform and lactic sion and performance of growing-finish-
acid bacteria in the swine stomach con- ing pigs after dietary addition of a
tent and in the digesta from the small mixture of organic acids and salts, con-
sisting mainly of benzoic acid. The study
Table 1. Antibacterial activity of benzoic was conducted during three fattening
acid in vitro (adapted from Lueck, 1980). periods, involving two identical housing
Micro-organism pH MIC (ppm) compartments (six pens per compart-
ment, containing 66 pigs).
Pseudomonas 6.0 200-480
All pigs per compartment were fed
Micrococcus 5.5-5.6 50-100
either control or acidified feed and after
Streptococcus 5.2-5.6 200-400
each experimental period the treatments
Lactobacillus 4.3-6.0 300-1800
were changed over. The experimental
E. coli 5.2-5.6 50-120
grower and finisher diets were supple-
Bacillus cereus 6.3 500
mented with 0.7 and 1.4% of benzoic

32 International Pig Topics — Volume 20 Number 7


w feed ishing pigs in a separate compartment in
order to investigate possible influence on
performance. The used grower and fin-
isher diets were formulated to contain 17
and 15% crude protein, respectively.
This trial consisted of three subsequent
periods, each involving both treatments
(control and acidified diets), assigned to
utrition and Health, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. a total of nine replicates with 11 pigs each.
The results indicated some beneficial
effects of experimental diets on growth
acid in grower and finisher. The mean performance, which were reflected in a
urinary pH in pigs during the growing numerically increased daily weight gain
period was significantly reduced from (+1.9%) and a significant improvement
7.50 to 5.69. In the finishing period, the of feed conversion from 2.72 to 2.64 (see
feeding of acidified diets resulted again Table 4). In 2004, a comparative growth
in a significant decrease of the mean uri- trial was conducted at the Catholic
nary pH from 7.48 to 5.02. University Leuven in order to evaluate
These acidification effects were also the effects of dietary addition of benzoic
visible in the pig slurry. During the fin- acid (VevoVitall) on performance of
ishing period, the mean pH of the top growing-finishing pigs.
layer of slurry was significantly reduced A three phase feeding system was used
by 0.78, from 7.82 to 7.04. and the diets were formulated to contain
18.0, 16.3 and 15.0% crude protein,
Dose Coliform Lactic acid respectively. The results of this growth
(mM) bacteria (h-1) bacteria (h-1) trial are summarised in Table 5.
Dietary addition of benzoic acid (0.5%)
0 -0.25 0.69
resulted in a numerical increase of mean
12.5 -0.33 0.53
daily weight gain (+5.5%) and a remark-
25 -0.58 0.37
able and significant improvement of feed
50 -0.99 -0.05
conversion from 2.82 to 2.59.
100 -1.73 -0.18
The results of both growth trials clearly
200 <-7.00 <-7.00
confirmed that dietary addition of ben-
Table 3. Specific bacterial growth or death zoic acid has a potential to enhance the
rate at various doses of benzoic acid in
swine stomach content at pH 4.5 (accord- Treatment A B
ing to Knarreborg et al., 2002).
Benzoic acid (%) 0 0.5
Number of pigs 46 47
It is well known that a reduction in the
Initial weight (kg) 24.8 22.8
pH value of swine slurry results in a
Final weight (kg) 103.8 105.5
reduced ammonia emission. This phe-
Daily wt. gain (g) 693 731
nomenon was confirmed by the experi-
Daily feed int. (kg) 1.96 1.89
mental data, but the effects on NH3
FCR 2.82 2.59*
emission were more variable among the
experimental periods, being mainly *Significant difference versus control (P<0.05)
affected by season. The mean reduction
Table 5. Effects of benzoic acid (VevoVit-
of calculated ammonia emission all) at 0.5% on performance of growing-
(kg/pig/year) reached 28, 50 and 13%, in finishing pigs (adapted from Paulus et al.,
periods 1, 2 and 3, respectively. 2004).
In parallel to their study evaluating the
effect of acidified diets on ammonia performance of pigs, in particular the
emission, den Brok et al. (1999) also car- efficiency of feed conversion.
ried out a growth trial with growing-fin- Benzoic acid has been approved as a
Table 4. Performance of growing-finish- new feed additive for growing-finishing
ing pigs fed with control and acidified pigs. Due to its antibacterial activity in
diets (adapted from den Brok et al., 1999). the gut and specific metabolism, this
organic acid reveals multiple beneficial
Treatment Control Acidified effects. Dietary supplementation results
diets dietsa in a decrease of urinary pH, accompa-
Number of pigs 99 99 nied by a reduction in ammonia emis-
Initial weight (kg) 26.1 26.2 sion and improved growth performance,
Final weight (kg) 107.4 108.2 in particular with regard to feed conver-
Daily wt. gain (g) 723 737 sion efficiency.
Daily feed int. (kg) 1.97 1.95 Therefore, benzoic acid appears to be
FCR 2.72 2.64* an easy and cost effective mean to
a
Grower and finisher diets contained 0.7 reduce ammonia emission in pig houses
and 1.4% benzoic acid, respectively and in the environment. ■
*
Significant difference versus control (P<0.05) References are available
from the authors on request.

International Pig Topics — Volume 20 Number 7 33

You might also like