Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Data 1 FT1 (LPM) FT2 (LPM) VH (m3/s) VC (m3/s) H (KG/S) C (KG/S) U (kW/m3.K)

    Uploaded by

    Aeyrul Khairul
    4 views1 page
    This document contains data from two experiments that tested different flow rates of hot (FT1) and cold (FT2) fluids through a heat exchanger. In the first experiment (Data 1), flow rates of hot and cold fluids were varied between 2-10 LPM and efficiency ranged from 14.4-8.38% as flow rates increased. In the second experiment (Data 2), the cold fluid flow rate was held at 10 LPM while the hot fluid rate was varied, resulting in higher maximum heat transfer rates but lower efficiencies ranging from 5.25-2.58% compared to the first experiment.

    Original Description:

    kjshx

    Original Title

    Concentric H.E Result

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains data from two experiments that tested different flow rates of hot (FT1) and cold (FT2) fluids through a heat exchanger. In the first experiment (Data 1), flow rates of hot and cold fluids were varied between 2-10 LPM and efficiency ranged from 14.4-8.38% as flow rates increased. In the second experiment (Data 2), the cold fluid flow rate was held at 10 LPM while the hot fluid rate was varied, resulting in higher maximum heat transfer rates but lower efficiencies ranging from 5.25-2.58% compared to the first experiment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    4 views1 page

    Data 1 FT1 (LPM) FT2 (LPM) VH (m3/s) VC (m3/s) H (KG/S) C (KG/S) U (kW/m3.K)

    Uploaded by

    Aeyrul Khairul
    This document contains data from two experiments that tested different flow rates of hot (FT1) and cold (FT2) fluids through a heat exchanger. In the first experiment (Data 1), flow rates of hot and cold fluids were varied between 2-10 LPM and efficiency ranged from 14.4-8.38% as flow rates increased. In the second experiment (Data 2), the cold fluid flow rate was held at 10 LPM while the hot fluid rate was varied, resulting in higher maximum heat transfer rates but lower efficiencies ranging from 5.25-2.58% compared to the first experiment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    DATA 1

    FT1 FT2 VH VC ṁH ṁC Cmin (kJ/ qH q max Efficiency ΔTm U


    (LPM) (LPM) (m3/s) (m3/s) (kg/s) (kg/s) K.s) (kW) (kW) (%) (K) (kW/m3.K)
    −4 −4
    10 2 1.66710 0.33310 0.1647 0.0329 0.1375 0.3443 2.393 14.4 14.59 0.3522

    −4 −4
    10 4 1.66710 0.66710 0.1647 0.0659 0.2754 0.4132 4.930 8.38 16.41 0.3758

    −4 −4
    10 6 1.66710 1.010 0.1647 0.0988 0.4129 0.5509 7.680 7.17 17.58 0.4677

    −4 −4
    10 8 1.66710 1.33310 0.1647 0.1317 0.5504 0.5509 10.51 5.24 18.24 0.4508

    −4 −4
    10 10 1.66710 1.66710 0.1647 0.1647 0.6883 0.5509 11.84 4.65 17.14 0.4797

    DATA 2
    FT1 FT2 VH VC ṁH ṁC Cmin (kJ/ qH q max Efficiency ΔTm U
    (LPM) (LPM) (m3/s) (m3/s) (kg/s) (kg/s) K.s) (kW) (kW) (%) (K) (kW/m3.K)
    −4 −4
    2 10 0.33310 1.66710 0.0329 0.1647 0.6883 0.3301 12.80 2.58 17.06 0.2888
    −4 −4
    4 10 0.66710 1.66710 0.0659 0.1647 0.6883 0.6613 12.60 5.25 16.81 0.5872
    −4 −4
    6 10 1.010 1.66710 0.0988 0.1647 0.6883 0.6609 12.66 5.22 17.22 0.5728
    −4 −4
    8 10 1.33310 1.66710 0.1317 0.1647 0.6883 0.5506 12.46 4.42 17.18 0.4783
    −4 −4
    10 10 1.66710 1.66710 0.1647 0.1647 0.6883 0.4820 12.11 3.98 16.79 0.4285

    You might also like