Carats of Mineral yn etic Cen coe ap tau 2) wy Cours Js appellate dsc, circuit ¥ £ reniduet Proacgiad (LoS tote 4) AER inal prerogatives) eegiduas gums (ha-4 Rade ‘HY re Grictin at CA (MOA 4s DOT d Oxy Of Wmbndemen!) bes . . FA igh — Roadie dncwe ataeds net Alird sh pYnci a ee Sp at nl Pt 7 tes ine aitcrure ay ox 4 judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980 4 BP. Big. 129 FRA 691 Frye Oalerell Hunadidlaeh fas 384 ap re CA 4. RA 8369 (Fatty Cours Actof Manila vs, Judge Cuerdo, Febraary 4, 2014 Sut Twitdnin Joxysded Twitticina claus: iganbayan, 762 SCRA 663 wer and Pnergy Co. Ine, ‘Nueva Fea, 759 SCRA 180 760 SCRA 65: Be Regalus Dev. Inc vs, De la Cruz, 781 SCRA 607 (1/25/2016) ett Tuition TLRULES 1105 A. Actions: Commencement (Sections 3 and 5, Rel) 1. Alday vs. FGU Insurance, 350 SCRA 2. Koren Technologies vs. Lerma, 542 SCRA 3. Mereado vs. CA, $69 SCRA 7. Gipa vs. Soutiem Luzon Instiute, 726 SCRA, 6/18/2014 8. Reyes vs. Pople, 763 SCRA 226 (2015) More on docket fees: 1. 785 SCRA 1 2, 805 SCRA 436 3. 807 SCRA 204 BB, One suit for one action (Sec. 3, R-2)Oliver —390 SCRA 263 De la Cruz ~ 464 SCRA S91 6. Carabeo vs. Dingco, 647 SCRA 200 7. Del 757 SCRA 160 Q015), 783 SCRA 87 (2015) 1, Pacific Consultants international Asia vs, Schonfeld, SIGSCRA 2. Bisco vs. Countryside Rural Bank ~ S15 SCRA 106 3. BPH Savings Bank vs. Sps. Yujuico, 763 SCRA 486 E, Summary Procedure vs. Small Claims suit ther basic characersties os MIL RULES 6-9 ‘A. Kinds of Pleadings (R-6) Complaint and Answer (S-3,4, R-6) ‘Defenses: Negative and A irmative ($5, R-6) Cau ms: Compulsory and Permissive (8-6, R-6) RO) Alba vs. Malapajo, 780 SCRA, Lim Teck Chuan vs. Uy, 752 8 ‘Metrobank vs. CPR Promotions, 760 SCRA 59 ‘Dabon, 795 SCRA 1 vv Sandiganbayan, 406 SCRA 190 Sugar Comp. ws. Alon, 533 SCRA 283. Benguet Exploration Ine. vs CA. 4. Asien Const Dov Cory. v8.8. SSBSCRA Ade nd Spent Plaines 10) Kinds of Amendments (5-2, 4, Remington Industrial Sales Corp. 5 Palileo vs. Planters Dev. Bank, 738 SCRA 6. Heirs of Numerisno Miranda vs. Mirand, 200 SCRAInd. & Com, Corp., vs Tas- 326 SCRA 9. Fortune Life Insurance Co. vs. COA, 748 SCRA 286 9, Ong vs. Co, 752 SCRAM2 (2/2 12, Guy vs. Gucott, 780 SCRA 579 (ln. 13, 2016) G. Voluntary Appeatance (S-20) 1. Sunrise Garden Corp. vs, CA 771 SCRA 616 VL RULES 15-19 Reequiremsents Omnibus Motion (6-8)5, Anonuevo ws, Intestate Estate of Jeandoni, 636 SCRA. 6, Femandez vs. CA, 691 SCRA 167 7, Rodriguez vs. CA, 698 SCRA 352 8, People vs, Perez, 397 SCRA VIL. RULES 231932 ‘A. Modes of Discovery (R-23 10 29) ». Officers to take depositions ¢ Deposition upon waitin exemR28) ery (R29) Tne. vs, Reyes, 225 SCRA 622 (1995) STP SCRA. 6. Afufugenci vs. Metro Bank, 715 SCRA 399, February 5, 2014 7. isin vs. Sandiganbayan, 633 SCRA 8 People Busta, 697 SCRA 41, 9. Meiroban: vs, Sandoval, To Repbleve Hs of Eeriqu Oil, 692 SCRA 64s Ends of Aad en 1, Marano vs, Pryce Gases Inc., 255 SCRA 56 12, Phil. Health Ins. Corp. vs, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, 774 SCRA VIM RULES 33-36 2: Bemando vs. CA, 278 SCRA 782 3. Radiowealth Finance Co. vs. Del Rosario, 335 SCRA 288. 4, Cabador {GM Motor Trading Corporation, 771 SCRA 360 'B. Judgment on the Pleadings (R-34)SCRA 481 THE REMEDIES AGAINST FINAL JUDGMENTS 1X RULE37 + New Trial or Ree + Effects of 2 Grant oF Denial 6,7,8) 1, Mendezona vs Ozamis~ 376 SCRA 482 762. SCRA 523 " 1s, Rumbaua, 596 SCRA 15 vs, People, 77% SCRA 435 (1/1101 le vs. Li ka Kim, 429 SCRA 169, X. RULES 4010 45, A. Appeal from MTC to RIC Perfection of Appeal (S ) Abjeals from order of dismissal (S-8) B. Appeal ftom RTC to CA (Refi) Modes of Appeal . Appeais om CTA # QUA CA (R43) Contents of Petition (6-6) ‘Action on Petition (8-8) Effect of Appeat( , Ordinary Appealed Cas ‘Appellanis Brief (S-7) ‘Requirements ($-7)Mua. of Toa, 763 SCRA 349 326 = Preliminary Injunction (§-5) 1. The Prov. Govt of An 2. Thomasites Center for = Contents ($-4) ~ Bite 1. Diona vs, Balague, 688 SCRA 22 2. Santoe-ws. Santos, 737 SCRA 637 5. Lasala vs. National Food Authority, 767 SCRA 430 4. Manguba vs, MorgasSeva, 775 SCRA 312 5. Sibal vs. Buguel, 778 SCRASIT (1/11/16)upton vs equity of redemption 2. Who may redeem 2. Examination of obligor of ju 43. Appointment of receiver (S-4 4 Sale of ascertainable interest (8-42) 3, Judgment: principal vs surety ($-46) 5. Bffet of Jument (8-47) 1Linzem 2. in personam 3.resjudicatn K. Rifect of foreign judgment ($-48) Cases: Bates vs Batis — 374 SCRA 340 Fajardo vs. Quitalig, 400 SCRA 25 ‘Sanios vs. Commission on Fleetions, 399 SCRA 611 CRC vs, Magwin Marketing Corp, 402 SCRA 92 ity of Higan vs. Principal Mgnt Gr., 407 SCRA 554 Villauel vs, Femando, 412 SCRA 54 Moria vs, Bagagnan, 415 SCRA 624nan ve, CA, 417 SCRA 415 1: Dev, Comp, ~ $12 SCRA 269 12 ve, Felix ~ 508 SCRA 357 Fu 19, 7100 SCRA 68 15. RRC vs, Sera, 701 SCRA 124 16. City of Cebu vs, Dedama, 689 SCRA $47 17. PSALM vs, Maualad Homes, ne, 87 SCRA287 il is tereria? 13St03 XIV, RULES 48-56 ‘Dismissal of Appeal (R-S0) ‘Grounds (8-1); "Material date” rule