Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 44:85–95 (1999)

Movement of Turritella Spermatozoa:


Direction of Propagation and Chirality
of Flagellar Bends
Sumio Ishijima,1* Sanae A. Ishijima,2 and Björn A. Afzelius3
1Biological
Laboratory, Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute
of Technology, O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
2Department of Biology, Japan Women’s University, Mejirodai, Bunkyo-ku,

Tokyo, Japan
3Department of Ultrastructure Research, Wenner-Gren Institute,

University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden

The marine snail, Turritella communis, produces two types of spermatozoa, named
apyrene and eupyrene. Eupyrene spermatozoa are usually paired, but unpaired
ones are involved in fertilization. Movements of these spermatozoa were analyzed
using a video camera with a high-speed shutter. The eupyrene spermatozoa usually
swim with the head foremost but are able to swim flagellum foremost. A reversal of
the direction of their swimming was found to be the result of a change in the
direction of flagellar bend propagation, which changed with calcium concentration.
Reversal of the direction of bend propagation was accompanied by a reversal of
direction of the rotational movement of the spermatozoa around their long axis,
suggesting that the bending waves keep the sense of their three-dimensional form.
The swimming speed of apyrene spermatozoa in natural seawater was about
one-eighth of that of the eupyrene ones and remained almost constant in highly
viscous medium.The swimming speed of conjugated eupyrene spermatozoa was
the same as that of unpaired spermatozoa over a wide viscosity range (⬍3,000 cP).
No advantage of swimming by two spermatozoa could be detected in Turritella
spermatozoa. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 44:85–95, 1999. r 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Key words: bidirectional swimming; conjugated spermatozoa; marine snail; 9 ⴙ 2 axoneme; rotational
movement; sperm dimorphism

INTRODUCTION regulated by intracellular Ca2⫹ concentrations [Holwill


and McGregor, 1976; Baccetti et al., 1989; Ishijima et al.,
Turritella spermatozoa are unusual in that two types
1994]. Furthermore, a reversal of the swimming direction
exist, apyrene and eupyrene spermatozoa, and that the
of the tephritid spermatozoa was accompanied by a
eupyrene ones, which are usually paired, can swim
reversal of rotation of the spermatozoa around the long
backward as well as forward [Afzelius and Dallai, 1983]. axis [Baccetti et al., 1989]; the significance of these
These peculiarities are useful for an understanding of the phenomena, however, remained to be studied.
mechanism generating flagellar bends and of the meaning It has long been known that two types of spermato-
of sperm dimorphism and sperm conjugation. zoa are produced in several phyla (sperm dimorphism),
A change in the swimming direction has been especially Lepidoptera and Gastropoda [Wilson, 1925].
reported in several protozoa and spermatozoa [Holwill
and McGregor, 1976; Afzelius, 1983; Baccetti et al.,
1989; Curtis and Benner, 1991; Ishida et al., 1991; *Correspondence to: Dr. Sumio Ishijima, Biological Laboratory, Fac-
Ishijima et al., 1994]. A reversal of the swimming ulty of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology,
12-1, O-okayama 2-chome, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan.
direction of Crithidia cells and spermatozoa of tephritid E-mail: sishijim@bio.titech.ac.jp
flies and of Myzostomum has been shown to be due to a
change in the direction of bend propagation and to be Received 30 November 1998; accepted 14 July 1999

r 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


86 Ishijima et al.

Fig. 1. Phase-contrast video micrographs of unpaired eupyrene Turritella spermatozoa propagating


bending waves toward the base of the flagellum (A) and toward the tip (B). The time interval between
successive images is 1/30 s (A) and 1/60 s (B). Arrowheads indicate the corresponding bends. Bar ⫽ 30 µm.

TABLE I. Movement Characteristics of Eupyrene Turritella Spermatozoa


Free-swimming
Sperm attached to coverslipa spermb
Direction of bend Amplitude Wavelength Beat frequency Swimming
propagation (µm) (µm) (Hz) speed (µm/s)
Base to tip
Unpaired spermatozoa 7.2 ⫾ 1.7 52.9 ⫾ 4.2 30.0 ⫾ 10.0 144.0 ⫾ 27.2
Paired spermatozoa 7.3 ⫾ 2.2 51.2 ⫾ 2.3 30.0 ⫾ 14.1 169.0 ⫾ 33.4
Tip to base
Unpaired spermatozoa 3.6 ⫾ 1.5 25.6 ⫾ 2.0 8.1 ⫾ 1.7 11.8 ⫾ 5.1
aMean ⫾ S. D. for samples of 23 spermatozoa propagating bends from base to tip from four experiments and of 20
spermatozoa propagating bends from tip to base from five experiments.
bMean ⫾ S. D. for samples of 15 spermatozoa propagating bends from base to tip from four experiments and of 18

spermatozoa propagating bends from tip to base from five experiments.

This phenomenon has attracted many investigators, and Creed, 1962; Biggers and DeLamater, 1965; Phillips, 1972;
light and electron microscopic studies have been carried Temple-Smith and Bedford, 1980; Taggart et al., 1993], the
out on the morphology of the apyrene and the eupyrene snail family Turritella [Afzelius and Dallai, 1983], the primi-
spermatozoa and their spermatogenesis [Koike and Nishi- tive apterygote insect group Thysanura [Dallai and Afzelius,
waki, 1980; Braidotti and Ferraguti, 1982]. The eupyrene 1984], dytiscid water beetles [Dallai and Afzelius, 1985,
spermatozoa are known to be essential for fertilization 1987], and the diplopod myriapods [Reger and Fitzgerald,
[Kennedy and Keegan, 1992], but the function of the 1979]. These studies suggest the pairing is an adaptation for a
apyrene spermatozoa remains obscure. more effective swimming capacity, although many other
Conjugated spermatozoa have been described from suggestions as to the function of the conjugated spermatozoa
four or five animal groups; American marsupials [Biggers and have been offered [Afzelius and Dallai, 1987].
Movement of Turritella Spermatozoa 87

Fig. 3. A eupyrene Turritella spermatozoon swimming in a relatively


deep suspension. Micrographs of a spermatozoon swimming in a
circular path close to a coverslip when an observer views the cell from
above. Because the beating plane is parallel to the optical axis,
segments of the sperm flagellum are in focus. The time interval
between successive images is 1/30 s. Arrowheads indicate the corre-
sponding bends. Bar ⫽ 30 µm.

TABLE II. Percentage of Spermatozoa With Flagellar Waves


Propagating Proximally*
Medium % n
Standard solution ⫹ 0.3 mM EGTA 0 30
Standard solution ⫹ 0.1 mM EGTA 16 37
Standard solution ⫹ 1 mM CaCl2 88 32
Fig. 2. The time-course of flagellar movement of an unpaired eupyrene
Standard solution ⫹ 3 mM CaCl2 100a 29
Turritella spermatozoon. Bar ⫽ 30 µm. See text for details.
*Standard solution consists of Ca-free seawater (470 mM NaCl, 10
mM KCl, 54 mM MgSO4 , and 10 mM Tri-HCl, pH 8.2) and 20 µM
The purpose of this study was to investigate in detail the calcium ionophore A23187.
aSpermatozoa ceased their movement within one minute.
observation by one of us (B.A.A.). The movements of
Turritella spermatozoa, not only the eupyrene spermatozoa
but also the apyrene spermatozoa, were recorded by means of
a charged-coupled device (CCD) video camera with a high- these results, it is argued that the rotation of spermatozoa
speed shutter. Movement characteristics of conjugated eupy- around their long axis is related to the chirality of the bending
rene spermatozoa were compared with those of unpaired waves.
spermatozoa. Effects of free calcium ions and of viscosity
variations on these movements were also examined. The
MATERIALS AND METHODS
results obtained suggest that changes in the calcium concentra-
tion affect the direction of bend propagation, which in turn Turritella communis Lamarck snails were collected
determines the swimming direction of the spermatozoa. From near the Kristineberg Marine Biological Station, Fiske-
88 Ishijima et al.

Fig. 4. Phase-contrast video micrographs of the rotational movement of Turritella spermatozoa observed
along the sperm axis. Spermatozoa propagating bending waves distally roll counterclockwise when viewed
from the head (A), whereas spermatozoa propagating bending waves proximally roll clockwise (B). The
time interval between successive images is 1/60 s (A) and 1/2 s (B). Arrows indicate the direction of the
beating planes determined from the parts of the flagellum in focus. Bar ⫽ 10 µm.

bäckskil, Sweden, in the summers of 1990 and 1996. Ca2⫹ on the sperm movement, CaCl2 or [ethylene-
Snails having a total length of 2.3–3.0 cm were used. bis(oxyethylenenitrilo)]tetraacetic acid [EGTA] was added
Spermatozoa were obtained by micropipettes from the to a standard solution, which consists of Ca-free artificial
gonad after removing the shell. To prepare the unpaired seawater and 20 µM calcium ionophore A23187 (ICN
eupyrene spermatozoa, the conjugated spermatozoa were Biomedicals, Inc., Aurora, OH). A stock solution of 10
separated by pipetting several times. The movements of mM calcium ionophore A23187 was prepared in dimethyl
the sperm and their flagella were observed in natural sulfoxide (E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and stored at
seawater, artificial seawater consisting of 470 mM NaCl, 4°C. The presence of dimethyl sulfoxide did not change
10 mM KCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 54 mM MgSO4, and 10 mM the movement characteristics of the spermatozoa.
Tris-HCl, pH 8.2, and artificial seawater with the viscosi- For examination and recording of sperm movement,
ties of 110, 230, 780, and 3,000 cP, which were increased samples were transferred onto a glass slide beneath a
with methylcellulose (viscosity of 2% aqueous solution: raised coverslip (0.18 mm depth). In the experiments
4,000 cP, Tokyo Kasei Kogyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo). The examining the rotational movement of the spermatozoa
viscosity of artificial seawater with methylcellulose was around their long axis, samples were placed into a
measured by a falling ball viscometer [Ishijima et al., 0.30-mm-deep observation chamber and covered with a
1986] at 18°C. In experiments examining the effect of coverslip precoated with 0.5% agar and dried [Ishijima et
Movement of Turritella Spermatozoa 89

al., 1992]. This treatment with agar increased the number


of spermatozoa attached vertically to the coverslip and
did not change the rolling direction and the rotation
frequency of the spermatozoa (data not shown). The
movements of Turritella sperm and their flagella were
recorded using a Leitz Dialux 22 microscope equipped
with a phase-contrast condenser, objectives (Neofluor
40/0.75), and 12.5⫻ eyepieces, or a Leitz Laborlux S
microscope with a phase-contrast condenser, objectives
(EF 40/0.65 and 25/0.50), and 10⫻ eyepieces. Images
were recorded on VHS 1⁄2-inch cassette videotape with a
Panasonic CCD video camera with a shutter of 1/500 s
(WV-BD 400, Matsushita Communication Industrial Co.,
Ltd., Yokohama). For preparation of the figures, images
on the video monitor were photographed with a frozen Fig. 5. Relationship between the swimming speed and the viscosity of
field using Fuji Neopan F 35-mm film. Observations and the medium. Each point represents the average of 11 to 27 spermato-
recording were made at 17–20°C. zoa. The vertical bars are standard deviations. The lines are weighted
The movements of the sperm and their flagella were least square regression lines with a slope of ⫺0.35 for paired (䊉) and
⫺0.33 for unpaired (䊊) spermatozoa.
analyzed by methods previously described [Ishijima et
al., 1994]. The direction of sperm rotation around its
longitudinal axis was determined from the direction of zoa that had flagellar waves propagating proximally often
rotation of flagellar images [Ishijima et al., 1992]. recovered the flagellar waves of large amplitude and of
high beat frequency and changed the direction of wave
RESULTS propagation. Addition of 10 mM caffeine or 8-bromoad-
enosine 3’:5’-cyclic monophosphate (Sigma Chemical
Bidirectional Propagation of Flagellar Waves of Co., St. Louis, MO) to the sperm suspensions prolonged
Eupyrene Spermatozoa in Natural Seawater the movement of the distally propagating waves and
In natural seawater, both forward and backward restored the active movement of sperm flagella that had
swimming spermatozoa were seen in a microscopic field. propagated proximally. Therefore, three types of sperm
All spermatozoa (more than 100 spermatozoa) that propa- flagella could be seen in the field of viewing: (1) flagella
gated the flagellar waves from the base of the flagellum to propagating large bending waves distally; (2) flagella
the tip swam with the head foremost, whereas all propagating short bending waves proximally; and (3)
spermatozoa (more than 100 spermatozoa) that propa- flagella propagating waves simultaneously in two direc-
gated the waves from the tip to the base swam with the tions with the distally propagating waves in the proximal
flagellum foremost. These spermatozoa exhibited one region of a flagellum and the proximally propagating
characteristic feature: the distal end of the flagella hardly ones in the distal region. The propagation velocity of the
exhibited transverse movement while the sperm flagella bending waves was not always the same in a flagellum;
beat (Fig. 1). Movement characteristics of these two types the propagation velocity of distally propagating waves in
were, however, quite different; spermatozoa swimming the distal region was faster than that in the proximal
with the head foremost moved fast and had flagellar region.
waves of large amplitude and high beat frequency, When the eupyrene spermatozoa were swimming in
compared with spermatozoa swimming with the flagel- a deep observation chamber, they moved in spiral paths.
lum foremost (Table I and Fig. 1). Spermatozoa that came in contact with the coverslip or
Turritella spermatozoa changed their swimming the slide glass moved almost in circles. Their beating
direction by a spontaneous reversal of bend propagation. plane was curved and perpendicular to the glass surface
Generally, the spermatozoa kept propagating distally the (Fig. 3). A curved beating plane was also noticed in
flagellar waves for approximately 10 min (Fig. 2A). The spermatozoa sticking to the glass surface by the head; the
proximally propagating flagellar waves appeared first in entire length of a sperm flagellum was not completely in
the tip region of the flagella, then gradually extended focus (Fig. 1). The flagellar waves were fairly symmetri-
toward the base of the flagellum (Fig. 2B and C), and cal with a constant amplitude over the entire flagellum
finally covered the whole flagellum (Fig. 2D) by approxi- when viewed from the direction perpendicular to the
mately 5 min. Usually the proximally propagating waves beating plane.
kept beating for more than 10 min. The sequence of these No significant difference in the movement character-
changes in flagellar waves was not so exact; the spermato- istics (amplitude, wavelength, and beat frequency of
90 Ishijima et al.

Fig. 6. Typical bending waves of unpaired


eupyrene Turritella spermatozoa swimming in
media of increased viscosity. A: 110 cP. B:
230 cP. C: 3,000 cP. Bar ⫽ 30 µm.

flagellar waves and swimming speed of spermatozoa) of their flagellar waves [Taylor, 1952; Gray, 1962;
could be detected between paired and unpaired spermato- Ishijima et al., 1992]. Therefore, valuable information on
zoa (Table I). the three-dimensional geometry of flagellar waves will be
obtained from the parameters of the rotational movement
Effects of Calcium Ion on the Propagating of spermatozoa; for example, knowledge of the direction
Direction of Flagellar Waves of sperm rotation gives us the sense of the three-
To elucidate the factor influencing the direction of dimensional geometry in flagellar waves. To examine
flagellar wave propagation, the effects of calcium ion on whether or not the conformational change of flagellar
the propagation direction of flagellar waves were exam- waves of spermatozoa is caused by changing the propaga-
ined by altering the concentration of CaCl2 or EGTA in tion direction of bending waves, the rotational movement
the presence of 20 µM calcium ionophore A23187. A of spermatozoa around their axis was examined using
decrease in EGTA and an increase in CaCl2 in the unpaired eupyrene spermatozoa in standard solution
standard solution increased the percentage of the sperma- containing either 0.3 mM EGTA or 1 mM CaCl2. In the
tozoa propagating flagellar waves proximally (Table II). former solution, all spermatozoa had distally propagating
The parameters of flagellar waves propagating proxi- flagellar waves, whereas in the latter solution almost all
mally in the standard solution did not differ essentially spermatozoa had proximally propagating flagellar waves
from that in natural seawater (data not shown) except for (Table II).
the duration of motility, which rapidly decreased with All spermatozoa (n ⫽ 58) propagating bending
high calcium concentrations. waves from the base of the flagellum to the tip rotated
counterclockwise, as viewed from the head to the tail
Rotational Movement of an Unpaired Eupyrene (Fig. 4A). The average rotation frequency was 10.1 ⫾ 3.1
Spermatozoon Around Its Axis Hz (n ⫽ 15). On the other hand, all spermatozoa (n ⫽ 22)
The rotational movement of spermatozoa around propagating bending waves from the tip to the base
their long axis is due to the three-dimensional geometry rotated clockwise with the rotation frequency of 1.2 ⫾
Movement of Turritella Spermatozoa 91

Fig. 7. Phase-contrast video micrographs of paired eupyrene spermatozoa beating in natural seawater (A)
and in viscous seawater of 110 cP (B). The time interval between successive images is 1/60 s. Arrowheads
indicate the corresponding bends. Bar ⫽ 30 µm.

0.49 Hz (n ⫽ 12) (Fig. 4B). These results show that the to the one-third power of the viscosity (Fig. 5). No
chirality of flagellar waves does not change when the significant difference in the swimming speed could be
direction of wave propagation along the sperm flagella detected between paired and unpaired spermatozoa in
changes. seawater or in the four viscous seawaters. Typical flagel-
lar waves of unpaired spermatozoa in viscous seawaters
Effects of Viscosity on Eupyrene Sperm and Their are shown in Figure 6.
Flagellar Movements It is well known that two individual flagella beat
Turritella communis has internal fertilization; there- synchronously with one another even though they do not
fore, their spermatozoa will have to swim in fairly have physical contact with one another, as spirochetes
viscous medium in situ. To investigate the meaning of also do [Gray, 1928; Taylor, 1952]. To test the synchroni-
pairing of spermatozoa and the change in the movements zation in the paired eupyrene Turritella spermatozoa, the
of spermatozoa and their flagella in viscous medium, the flagellar movements were examined in seawater and the
sperm and their flagellar movements were examined in four viscous seawaters. In natural seawater, the two
viscous seawaters of 110, 230, 500, and 3,000 cP. The spermatozoa in a pair beat with different phases (Fig. 7A),
swimming speed was found to be inversely proportional whereas in the seawater with viscosities over 110 cP,
92 Ishijima et al.

swimming in natural seawater. Some fragments moved


proximally (Fig. 9A), but most moved distally (Fig. 9B).
The movements of flagellar fragments were less active
than that of whole flagella.

DISCUSSION
Bidirectional Swimming of Eupyrene Spermatozoa
Turritella spermatozoa can move forward and back-
ward. The bidirectional swimming seems to be a general
characteristic of the snail spermatozoa because the eupy-
rene spermatozoa of the mud creeper (Terebralia palus-
tris) and the black snail (Semisulcospira bensoni) also
showed bidirectional swimming (Ishijima and Furukawa,
unpublished observations). There are basic differences in
the movement parameters between waves propagating
toward the tip of the flagella and those moving toward the
base, as shown in Table I and Figure 1. The distally
propagating waves were more effective than the proxi-
mally propagating ones: the swimming speed of sperma-
tozoa with distally propagating waves was more than 12
times that of spermatozoa with proximally propagating
Fig. 8. Phase-contrast video micrographs of the flagellar movement of waves, and the distally propagating waves generally
apyrene spermatozoa. A spermatozoon swims in natural seawater (A) preceded the proximally propagating ones in the time
and in viscous seawater of 3,000 cP (B). Bar ⫽ 30 µm. course of the flagellar movement of eupyrene spermato-
zoa, even though the reverse transition occasionally
paired spermatozoa were aggregated and beat in union happened. Thus, it is unlikely that backward swimming in
(Fig. 7B). Turritella spermatozoa plays an important role. The
presence of calcium ion increased the percentage of
Movements of Apyrene Spermatozoa spermatozoa with the proximally propagating waves and
It has been suggested that the apyrene spermatozoa seemed to inhibit the distally propagating waves; thereby,
may aid in the transport of the eupyrene spermatozoa due the proximally propagating waves were able to appear on
to their greater motility [Friedländer and Gitay, 1972]. the sperm flagella. This interpretation seems to be sup-
Apyrene spermatozoa from Turritella were hence re- ported by several findings. Caffeine or 8-bromoadenosine
corded with respect to their movement in natural seawater 3’:5’-cyclic monophosphate, both of which activate the
or the seawaters with different viscosities. An apyrene sperm motility [Mann and Lutwak-Mann, 1981], pro-
Turritella spermatozoon consists of a head (without a longed the duration of flagellar movement of distally
nucleus) and eight or more flagella (8.6 ⫾ 1.7, propagating waves and restored the active movement of
mean ⫾ S.D., n ⫽ 12). One of these flagella is longer sperm flagella that had proximally propagated bending
(0.23 ⫾ 0.11 mm, n ⫽ 11) than the others (0.04 ⫾ 0.02 waves. Only at unusually high concentrations of calcium
mm, n ⫽ 11). The average swimming speed of the did all the spermatozoa exhibit the proximally propagat-
apyrene spermatozoa was 19.3 µm/s (S.D. ⫽ 12.0, n ⫽ 18) ing waves. Turritella spermatozoa can move backward as
in natural seawater and 11.2 µm/s (S.D. ⫽ 4.1, n ⫽ 20) in well as forward like some other spermatozoa and many
the 3,000 cP seawater. The swimming speed of the protozoa [Holwill and McGregor, 1976; Baccetti et al.,
apyrene spermatozoa in natural seawater was rather 1989; Ishijima et al., 1994]. Crithidia cells and tephritid
slower than that of the eupyrene spermatozoa but was and Myzostomum spermatozoa, in which the backward
almost the same as that in the 3,000 cP seawater. Many swimming is usual, abruptly change their swimming
flagella beat independently in natural seawater (Fig. 8A), direction, but such a rapid change in swimming direction
whereas they beat in union in the 3,000-cP seawater (Fig. 8B). could not be detected in Turritella spermatozoa, although
spermatozoa with proximally propagating waves restored
Movements of Distal Tail Fragments of Eupyrene the flagellar waves propagating distally within a short
Spermatozoa time. Thus, the role of a change in the swimming
An unexpected finding in this study was that of the direction of Turritella spermatozoa seems to differ from
distal tail fragments of the eupyrene sperm flagella that of these cells.
Movement of Turritella Spermatozoa 93

Fig. 9. Phase-contrast video micrographs of distal fragments of unpaired eupyrene spermatozoa. A


fragment that moves toward the base of the flagellum (A) and one toward the tip (B). The swimming speed
of the flagellar fragment (with a total length of 51.4 µm) was 6.6 µm/s in A and that of the flagellar fragment
(the total length of 67.5 µm) was 3.9 µm/s in B. Amplitude of the flagellar fragment in B was 2.5 µm; beat
frequency, 4.6 Hz; and wavelength, 25.2 µm. The time interval between successive images is 2 s. Bar ⫽ 30 µm.

Eupyrene Turritella spermatozoa swam almost in beating plane has also been described for the spermatozoa
circles when moving freely near a coverslip, as sea urchin of the humpbacked fly [Curtis and Benner, 1991].
spermatozoa also do [Ishijima and Hamaguchi, 1992].
However, the circular rotation of Turritella spermatozoa Direction of Wave Propagation and Chirality of
is due to the bending of the beating plane of flagellar Flagellar Waves
waves (Fig. 3), rather than to an asymmetry of the The eupyrene Turritella spermatozoa reversed the
flagellar waves (a difference in curvature between the direction of their swimming as a result of a change in the
principal and reverse bends) as seen in other spermato- direction of bend propagation, this direction apparently
zoa, including those of sea urchins and mammals. Be- being regulated by calcium ions. When the spermatozoa
cause the beating plane of Turritella spermatozoa is in the were viewed from head to tail, a reversal of direction of
direction perpendicular to the line connecting the central the bend propagation accompanied the reversal of the
microtubules [Afzelius and Dallai, 1983] as the others do, sperm rotating around their long axis. Baccetti et al.
the bending of the beating plane in the Turritella sperma- [1989] reported the same findings in spermatozoa of
tozoa is perhaps caused by a mechanism that is different tephritid flies; thus their flagellar waves, which propagate
from that of other spermatozoa. The bending of the from the tip of the flagellum toward the head, induce the
94 Ishijima et al.

sperm to rotate clockwise with respect to the advance-


ment direction, whereas flagellar waves that propagate
from the head toward the tail tip induce the sperm to
rotate clockwise with respect to the advancement direc-
tion as well. These findings in the spermatozoa of both
tephritid flies and Turritella snails suggest that the sense
of the three-dimensional flagellar waves of these sperma-
tozoa does not change when the direction of bend
propagation changes (Fig. 10). This response to calcium
ions differs from that of sea urchin spermatozoa; these do
not change the propagation direction along the flagella by
altering the calcium ion concentration, but they change the
sense of flagellar waves [Ishijima and Hamaguchi, 1993].
These differences in the response to calcium ions
between sea urchin and Turritella spermatozoa can be
explained by a different behavior of active sliding be-
tween the doublet microtubules. The rotational move-
ment of spermatozoa around their long axis is due to the
three-dimensional movement of their flagella, and the
direction of sperm rotation is determined by the sense of
their three-dimensional geometry [Gray, 1962; Ishijima
and Hamaguchi, 1993]. The three-dimensional flagellar Fig. 10. Hypothetical diagram explaining the rotational direction of
waves are generated by localized active sliding between the spermatozoa and the propagation direction of their bending waves.
doublet microtubules transmitting around the flagellar Two flagella (open and dotted) with a phase difference of about a
quarter cycle are shown. Distally propagated bending waves of a
circumference as well as propagating along the flagellum left-handed helix rotate a spermatozoon counterclockwise (curved
[Ishijima and Hamaguchi, 1993]. The two propagation arrow) when viewed from the head because the direction of rotation of
directions, around the flagellum and along it, in response the spermatozoon is opposite to that (arrow) of the angular movement
to Ca2⫹ differ between sea urchin and Turritella sperma- of segments of the flagellum (A), whereas proximally propagated
tozoa. In sea urchin spermatozoa, transmitting the local- bending waves of the same sense rotate a spermatozoon clockwise (B).
The flagellar waves are tentatively illustrated as flattened helices
ized active sliding between doublet microtubules around because there is no detailed information on it.
the flagellum in an alternative direction changes the
chirality of the three-dimensional bending waves. On the
other hand, in Turritella spermatozoa, the propagation of Conjugated Spermatozoa
a localized sliding along the flagella will change the There was little difference in the movement charac-
direction of propagation of the bending waves. In sea teristics between the paired and the unpaired eupyrene
urchin spermatozoa, changing the propagation direction Turritella spermatozoa in either normal or viscous seawa-
around the flagella seems to be easier than that along the ter (Table I and Fig. 5). This finding differs from the
flagella, whereas in Turritella spermatozoa, the reverse is previous reports on cooperative swimming in the Ameri-
found, possibly because of mechanical conditions at the can opossum in which two spermatozoa are more forceful
distal region of the sperm flagellum. The doublet microtu- in their swimming than are single spermatozoa [Biggers
bules may, for instance, attach to the plasma membrane and Creed, 1962; Moore and Taggart, 1995]. This may be
[Afzelius and Dallai, 1983], maybe as an adaptation to due to a difference in the orientation of the two conju-
enable the spermatozoa to change the direction of bend gated spermatozoa in Turritella and in the opossum. In
propagation along rather than around the flagellum the Turritella spermatozoa, the two spermatozoa in a pair
[Machin, 1958; Kaneda, 1965]. The finding that distal frag- face the same direction [Afzelius and Dallai, 1983],
ments of the eupyrene sperm flagella could swim both whereas in the American opossum the two spermatozoa
forward and backward may support this idea because face each other [Temple-Smith and Bedford, 1980; Tag-
such fragments usually cannot move in other spermato- gart, et al., 1993]. A difference in the sperm alignment is
zoa [Okuno and Hiramoto, 1976; Woolley and Bozkurt, also observed in the beating pattern of paired spermato-
1995]. The important feature in the flagellar movement of zoa; the paired Turritella spermatozoa beat with a phase
Turritella spermatozoa in which the distal end of the difference that is less than a quarter cycle, whereas the
flagella hardly showed transverse movement also implies paired opossum spermatozoa beat with a phase difference
that active sliding between the doublet microtubules is of approximately half a cycle [compare Fig. 7 in the
inhibited at the distal end of the Turritella sperm flagella. present paper with fig. 12 in Phillips, 1972, or fig. 3 in
Movement of Turritella Spermatozoa 95

Moore and Taggart, 1995]. The difference in orientation Gray J. 1962. Flagellar propulsion. In Bishop DW, editor. Spermato-
of the two spermatozoa may induce different responses to zoan motility. Washington, DC: American Association for the
Advancement of Science. p 1–12.
the viscosity; the paired Turritella spermatozoa beat in Holwill MEJ, McGregor JL. 1976. Effects of calcium on flagellar
union in highly viscous seawaters, whereas the paired movement in the trypanosome Crithidia oncopelti. J Exp Biol
opossum spermatozoa beat independently in a medium of 65:229–242.
approximately the same viscosity [Moore and Taggart, 1995]. Ishida S, Yamashita Y, Teshirogi W. 1991. Analytical studies of the
The two flagella of paired Turritella spermatozoa ultrastructure and movement of the spermatozoa of freshwater
triclads. Hydrobiologia 227:95–104.
did not beat in phase in natural seawater, in contrast to the Ishijima S. 1992. Methods for analyzing sperm motility. In Mohri H,
situation of closely adjacent sea urchin spermatozoa. This Morisawa M, Hoshi M, editors. Spermatology. Tokyo: Univer-
is probably due to the accessory fibers of Turritella sity of Tokyo Press. p 212–224 (in Japanese).
spermatozoa. In fact, spermatozoa of the American Ishijima S, Hamaguchi Y. 1992. Relationship between direction of
opossum also did not beat in phase [Phillips, 1972; Moore rolling and yawing of golden hamster and sea urchin spermato-
zoa. Cell Struct Funct 17:319–323.
and Taggart, 1995] and neither do adjacent mammalian Ishijima S, Hamaguchi Y. 1993. Calcium ion regulation of chirality of
spermatozoa [Ishijima, 1992], although large-scale wavy beating flagellum of reactivated sea urchin spermatozoa. Bio-
motions can be seen in a dense sperm suspension of bull phys J 65:1445–1448.
or ram spermatozoa [Rothschild, 1949; Mann and Lutwak- Ishijima S, Oshio S, Mohri H. 1986. Flagellar movement of human
Mann, 1981; Ishijima, 1992]. spermatozoa. Gamete Res 13:185–197.
Ishijima S, Hamaguchi MS, Naruse M, Ishijima SA, Hamaguchi Y.
1992. Rotational movement of a spermatozoon around its long
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS axis. J Exp Biol 163:15–31.
Ishijima S, Ishijima SA, Afzelius B. 1994. Movement of Myzostomum
We thank the director, Prof. J.-O. Strömberg, and spermatozoa: calcium ion regulation of swimming direction.
the staff of the Kristineberg Marine Biological Station, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 28:135–142.
Fiskebäckskil, Sweden, where this work was carried out, Kaneda Y. 1965. Movement of sperm tail of frog. J Fac Sci Univ Tokyo,
Sec.IV, 10:427–440.
for their generous hospitality. We also thank Dr. Y. Kennedy JJ, Keegan BF. 1992. The encapsular developmental se-
Hamaguchi for his active interest and advice. quence of the mesogastropod Turritella communis (Gastropoda:
Triitellidae). J Mar Biol Ass UK 72:783–805.
REFERENCES Koike K, Nishiwaki S. 1980. The ultrastructure of dimorphic spermato-
zoa in two species of the Strombidae (Gastropoda: Prosobra-
Afzelius BA. 1983. The spermatozoon of Myzostomum cirriferum chia). Venus 38:259–275.
(Annelida, Myzostomida). J Ultrastruct Res 83:58–68. Machin KE. 1958. Wave propagation along flagella. J Exp Biol
Afzelius BA, Dallai R. 1983. The paired spermatozoa of the marine 35:796–806.
snail, Turritella communis Lamarck (Mollusca, Mesogas- Mann T, Lutwak-Mann C. 1981. Male reproductive function and
tropoda). J Ultrastruct Res 85:311–319. semen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Afzelius BA, Dallai R. 1987. Conjugated spermatozoa. In: Mohri H, Moore HDM, Taggart DA. 1995. Sperm pairing in the opossum
editor. New horizons in sperm cell research. Tokyo: Japan increases the efficiency of sperm movement in a viscous
Scientific Societies Press/New York: Gordon and Breach Sci- environment. Biol Reprod 52:947–953.
ence Publishers, p 349–355. Okuno M, Hiramoto Y. 1976. Mechanical stimulation of starfish sperm
Baccetti B, Gibbons BH, Gibbons IR. 1989. Bidirectional swimming in flagella. J Exp Biol 65:401–413.
spermatozoa of Tephritid flies. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol Phillips DM. 1972. Comparative analysis of mammalian sperm motil-
21:619–625. ity. J Cell Biol 53:561–573.
Biggers JD, Creed RFS. 1962. Conjugate spermatozoa of the North Reger JF, Fitzgerald ME. 1979. The fine structure of membrane
American opossum. Nature 196:1112–1113. complexes in spermatozoa of the millipede, Spirobolus sp., as
Biggers JD, DeLamater ED. 1965. Marsupial spermatozoa pairing in seen by thin-section and freeze-fracture techniques. J Ultra-
the epididymis of American forms. Nature 208:402–404. struct Res 67:95–108.
Braidotti P, Ferraguti M. 1982. Two sperm types in the spermatozeug- Rothschild Lord 1949. Measurement of sperm activity before artificial
mata of Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Oligochaeta). J Morphol insemination. Nature 163:358.
171:123–136. Taggart DA, Johnson JL, O’Brien HP, Moore HDM. 1993. Why do
Curtis SK, Benner DB. 1991. Movement of spermatozoa of Megaselia spermatozoa of American marsupials form pairs? A clue from the
scalaris (Diptera:Brachycera:Cyclorrhapha:Phoridae) in artifi- analysis of sperm-pairing in the epididymis of the grey short-tailed
cial and natural fluids. J Morphol 210:85–99. opossum, Monodelphis domestica. Anat Rec 236:465–478.
Dallai R, Afzelius BA. 1984. Paired spermatozoa in Thermobia Taylor G. 1952. The action of waving cylindrical tails in propelling
(Insecta, Thysanura). J Ultrastruct Res 86:67–74. microscopic organisms. Proc R Soc London Ser A 211:225–239.
Dallai R, Afzelius BA. 1985. Membrane specializations in the paired Temple-Smith PD, Bedford JM. 1980. Sperm maturation and the
spermatozoa of dytiscid water beetles. Tissue Cell 17:561–572. formation of sperm pairs in the epididymis of the opossum,
Dallai R, Afzelius BA. 1987. Sperm ultrastructure in the water beetles Didelphis virginiana. J Exptl Zool 214:161–171.
(Insecta, Coleoptera). Boll Zool 4:301–306. Wilson EB. 1925. The cell in development and heredity. New York:
Friedländer M, Gitay H. 1972. The fate of the normal-anucleated MacMillan Inc.
spermatozoa in inseminated females of the silk worm Bombyx Woolley DM, Bozkurt HH. 1995. The distal sperm flagellum: its
mori. J Morphol 138:121–130. potential for motility after separation from the basal structures. J
Gray J. 1928. Ciliary movement. London: Cambridge University Press. Exp Biol 198:1469–1481.

You might also like