Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spe 36163 JPT
Spe 36163 JPT
Distinguished
Author Series
Summary proved operations, pinpointing which of the fixes may have contrib-
Beam pumping is the most used, on-land artificial-lift method for uted the most to the actual "solution" of the problem is difficult.
petroleum production applications and has been since oil was dis- However, when we report the solution to management and/or at con-
ferences, the tendency is to select the one new idea that was tried and
covered. Applications cover the full gamut of well types, including
give it most of the, and often the entire, credit. Although there are
oil, water, and gas at depths from shallow to very deep, producing
times when the new idea deserves the accolade, the true reason for
rates and volumes from low to high, viscous oil production, and de-
the solution frequently is from making the correct changes in funda-
watering-gas and coalbed-methane wells. Although beam pumping
mental engineering and operating practices.
has become the "standard" lift method for on-land wells, the best en- A similar situation exists when a problematic well or field is
gineering and operating practices still need to be followed to ensure switched from one type of lift to another. Typically, the comparison
cost-effective return on investment. When these best practices are of operations is from a "sick" operation with poor practices to a "well"
not followed, continued operating problems, equipment failures, situation where the new method has been properly designed and
low efficiencies, and high operating costs often result. This paper installed. Dramatic improvements in such factors as production effi-
presents some of the typical beam-pump engineering and operating ciencies, reduced failures, and lower overhead and operating costs are
practices that should be considered to obtain the most cost-effective normally reported when the comparison is made. However, the way
operation over the life of the installation. Additionally, recent indus- to make the correct comparison in appropriate situations is to ensure
try developments that are related to these practices are discussed. that both systems are optimized and that the fundamental, best prac-
tices are used for both operations during a specific life cycle.
Introduction This paper presents typical problems often encountered when
The selection of any artificial-lift method for an application depends beam pumping is used for lifting well fluids. The fundamental engi-
on a variety of parameters that must be considered over the full life neering and best operating practices that should be considered as part
cycle of the installation to select the "best" lift choice. Ref. I dis- of optimum, cost-effective operations are presented. All lift methods
cusses the selection procedure and parameters. This paper continues are being improved continuously, and beam pumping is not an excep-
tion. Recent improvements in beam pumping also are highlighted.
the discussion of the beam-pumping method that should be regarded
as the standard lift technique and the first consideration for any on-
Discussion
land production operation.
Beam pumping has the advantage of having wide exposure and A few fundamental operating concerns have been found to plague
its operation being known by many pcople :around the world. Al- troubled beam-pumping operations. When these problems are ana-
though this method has many benefits and practical applications, it lyzed and proper engineering and operating practices are applied,
should not be used for all producing operations. The practical oper- they usually are solved without the need for special equipment. This
ating range for beam pumping depends on many factors. There are section discusses some typical beam-pumping problems and pos-
sible solutions. These are reviewed in the order from the bottom of
some operating situations where an alternative lift method is being
the hole to the surface. Additionally, many other papers may discuss
considered because beam pumps are having too many problems. On
some of these aspects, such as Ref. 2. These papers also should be
closer examination, what is often found is that the correct beam-
consulted to see whether specific producing conditions change this
pump technology and best practices have not been used properly.
general discussion and these recommendations.
Typically, many changes are made to fix a problem and may in-
clude trying something new. Although this usually results in im- Downhole Gas Separation. Proper downhole gas separation is an
excellent place to make dramatic improvements in operating beam-
Copyright 1996 Society of Petroleum Engineers
pumped wells. 3 Critical to an installation is the size of the casing and
This paper is SPE 36163. Distinguished Author Series articles are general. descriptive rep· tubing that will be used. This is important because the annular space
resentations that summarize the state of the art in an area of technology by describing recent
developments for readers who are not specialists in the topics discussed. Written by individu-
between these strings of pipe is the best available downhole, verti-
als recognized as experts in the area, these articles provide key references to more definitive cal-gravity gas separator.
work and present specific details only to illustrate the technology. Purpose: to inform the gen- Engineering principles for downhole gas separation can be ob-
eral readership of recent advances in various areas of petroleum engineering. A softbound
anthology. SPE Distinguished Author Series: Dec. 1981·Dec. 1983. is available from SPE's
tained from proper surface separation practices. American Petro-
Book Order Dept. leum Inst. (API) Spec. 12J4 gives sizing or capacity formulas for
SEATING CUP
COUPLING. 5-16-_
COLLAR
STRAINER NIPPtE _SLOTS_IN.x _IN.
_ _ IN. NOM. L.P.
MUD ANCHOR
°O~-1~5--~~~~~~--~7b.----'~OO~--7.'2~,--~I*~~~ld75~--2~OO
PUMP INTAKE PRESSURE, PSIA
\....-'+-1I----IORANGE PEEL
I
I
I
Fig. 1-Gas/water separation capacity for selected casing! I
tubing annulus. I
I
I
surface oil and gas separators that can be applied downhole. Fig. 1 I
shows an application of the velocity formula to different casing/tub- ORANGE PEEL OR
1.0. PLUG
ing combinations. The capacity of the vertical separator for these se-
lected annuli to separate gas efficiently at a given pump-intake pres-
sure ranges from =25 to >400 McflD. CASING 1.0.
This type of analysis should be made for a specific field installa- "I
_ - ' - _ - ' -_ _ _ _ _ _
IN_._...;.p./;.,UGGEO BACK DEPTH
tion with the necessary casing and tubing size(s), downhole temper-
ature, specific gravities for water and gas, and the pump-intake pip-
ing and configuration to make the required production. This has Fig. 2-General arrangement for natural gas anchor.
direct implications when drilling and completing a well. Although
money can be saved by use of small casing, this may not always re- Rod-Pump Selection. The downhole rod pump (either insert or tub-
sult in a savings because the small casing may lead to long-term op- ing) has to be properly engineered and operated to obtain a mini-
erating problems, decreased production rates, possible loss in re- mum of 2, and up to a possible 5, years of operating life. McCaffer-
serves, and increased producing costs if the pump has to handle ty5 recently reported one engineering concept tied to the pump
excessive amounts of gas or water. handling gas that is a basic check to make sure that the pump's maxi-
Selecting the right size tubulars is the first step in proper downhole
mum available compression ratio is greater than the required com-
gas separation. Next is to make sure that the separator is properly
pression ratio for the installation. Because of the extra gas that has
placed in the well. To do this, a natural gas anchor should be properly
to be handled by the pump, poor efficiencies, operating problems as
designed and installed. Fig. 2 shows a schematic of a natural gas an-
the fluid level is pumped down, and the possibility of gas locking all
chor. A lot of attention has been paid to poor-boy or other gas anchors
increase when this basic check is not done.
with very little discussion of a natural gas anchor. Because proper de-
One of the main findings of his paper was that the waste space from
sign is more involved and critical for a poor-boy-anchor operation,
manufacturers varied for the same type pump. As part of a Conoco
greater emphasis is placed on the poor-boy anchor, implying that this
is the anchor to use. However, as a rule of thumb, a poor-boy gas an- internal convergence effort, additional work was done to compare the
chor reduces the capacity of downhole separation by about 30% more waste space of five different pumps from six different manufacturers.
than that of a properly designed and installed natural gas anchor. Table 1 presents this comparison for pumps sized according to API
There are operational considerations when a natural gas anchor Spec. llAX. 6 These waste spaces are mainly the result of the unre-
is used. The main requirement is that the rat hole be deep enough to stricted specifications for cage design. The lost volumes and their ef-
run the pump-intake piping about 15 ft below the lower most active fect on compression ratio must be considered. Even a new pump may
perforation. And, if the well produces sand or if the producing zone not be able to handle the gas as the fluid level is decreased during pro-
is an open hole that could cave in and stick the tubing, setting the duction if this is not done. These potential problems increase as the
tubing below the pay zone will probably not be practical. Under pump-setting depth is increased. On the basis of current work, an API
these conditions, a properly designed and built poor-boy gas anchor Committee 1, Subcommittee II task group, is investigating the need
is recommended for low- to moderate-production wells. A packer- and requirements to standardize cage dimensions. Remember, how-
type gas anchor for higher-rate wells may be used if the separation ever, that the ability of a pump (even one with a high compression ra-
capacity of the poor-boy type is exceeded. Regardless of which an- tio) to handle gas will be decreased if it is installed with improper
chor is used, the pump will have to pump the gas if the amount of spacing. Additionally, the fluid level effect on downhole, net plunger
gas is greater than the capacity of the anchor. stroke length may change enough to require res pacing the pump as
TABLE 1-WASTE SPACE COMPARISONS FOR DESIGNATED PUMPS FROM DIFFERENT MANUFACTURERS IN in.3
API Pump DeSignation Manufacturer A Manufacturer B Manufacturer C Manufacturer D Manufacturer E Manufacturer F
25-150-RWAC-16-5 5.03 5.53 6.00 5.63 5.77 7.70
20-125-RWBC-12-3 4.07 4.00 4.87 4.68 4.65 5.53
25-175-RHBC-24-6-2 8.12 9.72 12.59 9.82 9.98 13.72
25-225-THC-15-5 23.19 20.37 27.56 37.76 29.57 29.17
20-106-RWAC-12-3 3.47 2.49 2.73 2.77 3.14 4.07
0 1600 1/
o 320
in in
N N
'C 'C
)(
1400 e/O•65 )( 280 WdO•65"
Z
)(
=Pt/ z = P
a. ~
III III
)( 1200 )( 240
:8
,.. :8
,..
,.. ,..
c::i 1000 c::i
~
"
D.
Q
BAD DESIGN! ~
Q'<; re" 200 (j
...: DECREASE PD
oQ ...: BAD DESIGN! ~
Z
w 800 z DECREASE P ~
~o. ~ 160
:E
w We/O•B5 = Pp w
j 600 j Wc/0.B5 = Po
D.
III ~ 120
C BAD 0 SIGN!
400
C
D. INt REASE P D.
:E BAD DESIGN I
:::l
D.
~
D.
80 INCREASE Po
200 7~
40 f
l7~lf.
200 400 600 800 1000 ~/r
1
WELL CAPACITY, BID
40 80 120 160 200 240
WELL CAPACITY, BID
Fig. 3-Recommended relationship for pump displacement and
well capacity for efficient operation with time clocks and/or
pumpoff controllers. Fig. 4-Expanded relationship for lower-volume wells for
acceptable pump-displacement design.
the fluid level in a well is pumped down, especially in gaseous wells.
In fact, most installations should have the pump spaced out close to divided by 0.85 to 0.65 [(We/0.85);:?; PD;:?; (WclO.65»). Fig. 4 shows
the bottom after the well stabilizes. an expanded range for lower-volume wells. As changes in well capac-
The task group also is completing a significant revision to the ity occur over the production life of the field, the pump displacement
specification for sucker-rod pumps. New dimensional tolerances, needs to be re-evaluated periodically to ensure that it is still within the
larger-diameter pumps, improved quality and requirements for recommended range. Changes in pump displacement may require re-
checking tolerances, and standardized materials with appropriate design of the entire subsurface assembly, changing just the pump,
marking requirements are being included in the new document. This and/or changing the pumping speed and/or stroke length.
work is being done partly to meet the quality and auditability re- Note that following this design rule will result in a pump displace-
quirements necessary for the API Monogram program and partly to ment greater than the well capacity. This is necessary to allow for
make this a world-class specification as part of the new effort to con- pump wear and to achieve an acceptable run life while retaining the
vert API specifications into international specifications by the IntI. ability to produce all the necessary fluid down to the required pump-
Organization for Standardization (ISO). The new API edition of this intake pressure for the inflow performance relationship established
specification is expected to be available by the end of 1996. for the well. Thus, some type of well controller/time clock will still
Other improvements in downhole rod-pump technology have be needed. Although technology continues to improve and costs con-
been completed by an API task group developing pump-setting- tinue to decrease, a complete life-cycle cost comparison of the capital
depth capabilities,?,8 This technology is a new check to determine expenditure, personnel requirements, and operating costs for all types
the potential failure modes for a pump and to put in appropriate safe- of well-control systems needs to be performed for proper selection of
ty factors for the operating environment. This improved technology the optimum well controller for a beam-pump installation.
will help to obtain longer pump runs with fewer problems.
The Natl. Assn. of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) IntI. has also Sinker Bars. Sinker bars are heavy, weighted bars; used polished
been improving the materials selection technology of downhole rod rods; or larger diameter than normally required sucker rods placed
pumps. A dramatic improvement of the 1976 edition of metallic ma- directly above the pump. Some controversy still exists in the indus-
terials for rod pumps has bcen completed. 9 Although only sand and tryon the need or advantage of these bars. Sinker bars help to open
H2S production were addressed previously, the new edition expands the rod-pump traveling valve because a portion of the pressure re-
on the actual limits of these parameters, addresses C02 and chloride quired to open the traveling valve on the downstroke must be ob-
environments, and provides more complete coverage of the tained from the weight of the sucker-rod string pushing down on the
associated materials for the main pump parts. top of the plunger. This places the lower portion of the sucker-rod
One typical operating problem related to the design and selection string in compression. Rod buckling may result unless properly
of pumps is having a pump displacement much greater than the well sized and centralized sinker bars are used above the pump to supply
capacity. When this occurs, the well can be greatly overpumped and the necessary additional weight. Also, the rod-string buckle may not
experience bad fluid pounds. This results in a decrease in pump effi- necessarily decrease the life of the rod string as much as it increases
ciency and a dramatic increase in operating costs. Additional oper- friction load and downhole wear of the rods, coupling, and tubing.
ating problems, such as scale, also can develop. These problems can Use of sinker bars has numerous advantages. One operating ad-
lead to other failures, such as in the lower portion of the rod string vantage is that they minimize rod buckling by keeping tension on
from excessive compression or buckling, connection failures, and the sucker-rod string. They help the pump plunger to stay in the cen-
even surface-equipment failures. ter of the barrel and can increase the minimum polished-rod load.
Figs. 3 and 4 graphically show a rule of thumb for proper selection These advantages may result in decreased polished-rod horsepower,
of the pump displacement. Fig. 3 shows the acceptable design for decreased low tubing leaks, and possible increased production from
pump displacement, PD, to be within the range of well capacity, We, greater downhole stroke length. The overall advantage of sinker
40000
II--tI. I I I CW,
35000 35000 ~ Max. CBT = 1,300,000 In-Ibm
~- ,./'"' ./
~ 30000 E 30000
S
~ ::::-- .-II'
;;ii'_
~
1 25000
..."g Max. CST = 1,300,000 In-Ibm
-
125000
... ' \ C"CW
20000 -g 20000 -
a: a:
:! 15000 ] 15000
.!!
;e 10000 .!
n/ ~ :. 10000
5000 S- ~
o V \, 5000
0
V ~
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Polished Rod Position
(a) (a) Polished Rod PoslUan
35000
II\..
....... ..........
40000
--.... T T r I
....... .-....- L
-
35000
~ 30000
~ 30000
~ .... Max. CBT • 1,300,000 In.lbm "1
1 25000 ~
.... 125000
1
a:
20000 ...
~ 20000
:!
.
15000
Max. CST • 1,300,000 In·lbm a:
~ ] 15000
- ra-
:. 10000
cr-- ~ ~
~
---
10000
5000 D"""" i"-'"
V I\, 5000
'"'
a ./
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 a
Po.lshed Rod PoslUon a 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
(b) (b) Polished Rod PoslUon
1
....
'3
a:
:!
~
25000
20000
15000
:. 10000
~ 30000
125000
1
...
a:
20000
r-- - --- '"
I
cr-- o(J'"
r- ] 15000
.!!
;e
~
5000 10000
{c)
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Polished Rod POilUon
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
0
./
a 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1