Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Icel Riot Matrix 3
Icel Riot Matrix 3
Icel Riot Matrix 3
academic
performance
and
behavior—and
also
how
to
organize
that
C
Curriculum
would
include
scope,
sequencing,
pacing,
materials,
rigor,
format,
relevance
information
to
identify
probable
reasons
why
the
student
groups
are
not
The
environment
is
where
the
instruction
takes
E
place.
Variables
in
the
environment
include
experiencing
academic
or
behavioral
success.
Environment
classroom
expectations,
beliefs/attitudes,
peers,
school
culture,
facilities,
class
size,
The
ICEL/RIOT
matrix
is
not
itself
a
data
collection
instrument.
Instead,
it
is
an
attendance/tardies,
management
The
learner
is
who
is
being
taught.
This
is
the
organizing
framework
that
increases
schools’
confidence
both
in
the
quality
of
last
domain
that
is
considered
and
is
only
the
data
that
they
collect
and
the
findings
that
emerge
from
the
data
(Hosp,
addressed
when
the
curriculum
and
instruction
2006,
May).
The
leftmost
vertical
column
of
the
ICEL/RIOT
table
includes
four
L
Learner
are
found
to
appropriate
and
the
environment
accommodating.
Variables
include
motivation
prerequisite
skills,
organization/study
habits,
key
domains
of
learning
to
be
assessed:
Instruction,
Curriculum,
Environment,
abilities,
impairments,
and
history
of
and
Learner
(ICEL).
A
common
mistake
that
schools
often
make
is
to
assume
instruction.
that
student
learning
problems
exist
primarily
in
the
learner
and
to
underestimate
the
degree
to
which
teacher
instructional
strategies,
curriculum
demands,
and
environmental
influences
impact
the
learner’s
academic
performance.
The
ICEL
elements
ensure
that
a
full
range
of
relevant
explanations
for
student
problems
are
examined.
Potential
Sources
of
Information
The
top
horizontal
row
of
the
ICEL/RIOT
table
includes
four
potential
sources
of
student
information:
Review,
Interview,
Observation,
and
Test
(RIOT).
Schools
should
attempt
to
collect
information
from
a
range
of
sources
to
control
for
potential
bias
from
any
one
source.
R
Review
of
historical
records
and
products
The
power
of
the
ICEL/RIOT
matrix
lies
in
its
use
as
a
cognitive
strategy,
one
that
helps
educators
to
verify
that
they
have
asked
the
right
questions
and
sampled
from
a
sufficiently
I
Interview
of
key
stakeholders
broad
range
of
data
sources
to
increase
the
probability
that
they
will
correctly
understand
the
student’s
presenting
concern(s).
Viewed
in
this
way,
the
matrix
is
not
a
rigid
approach
but
O
Observe
performance
in
real
time
functional
settings
Test
student
through
careful
use
rather
serves
as
a
flexible
framework
for
exploratory
problem-‐solving.
T
of
appropriately
matched
measurement
technologies
Adapted
from
http://www.inghamisd.org/downloads/iisd_se_supportservices/problem_solving_facilitator_guide_11-‐12.pdf
and
http://ncspaonline.com/files/conference2012/cusumano-‐problemsolving/Hypotheses%20and%20Possible%20Targeted%20Strategies%20during%20Problem%20Solving.pdf
Problem-‐Solving
using
the
ICEL/RIOT
Matrix
• Use
of
a
variety
of
practice
• Reinforcement
management/
• Percent
of
time
with
to
meet
the
needs
of
engagement
strategies
direct
instruction,
whole
and
application
activities
the
learners?
• Allowable
repetition
for
mastery/
group
instruction,
• Pace
and
presentation
of
new
content
understanding
practice
time,
Consider:
differentiated
instruction,
• Block
of
time
allotted
per
• Who
is
providing
the
supplemental/
• instructional
intensive
instruction
etc.
techniques
subject
• Use
of
supportive
technology
• How
teachers
gain/
• presentation
style
maintain
student
• Student/group
performance
compared
to
• clarity
of
peers
attention
instruction
Individual
• Patterns
of
performance
errors/
behavior
• Academic
engaged
time
• questioning
• Instructional
decision
• Transitions
• Setting(s)
where
behavior
is
problematic
• feedback
technique
making
regarding
• Large
group
instruction
• Significance
of
academic,
speech,
social,
• cooperative
placement
of
the
student
• Small
group
instruction
task
or
motor
difficulties
learning
• in
groups
• Independent
work
time
• Onset
and
duration
of
problem
• use
of
graphic
• Use
of
progress
• Group
work
time
• Consistency
from
day
to
day,
subject
to
organizers
monitoring
• Teachers
use
of
positive
subject
• instructional
Communication
of
reinforcement,
student-‐
• Interference
with
personal,
interpersonal,
conversations
expectations
and
criteria
teacher
interaction
and
academic
adjustment
• development
of
for
success
quality/quantity,
(use
of
• Performance
using
different
modes
of
academic
• Differentiated
Instruction
direct
observation
expression
(e.g.
verbal,
written,
language/
• Direct
instruction
with
protocols)
kinesthetic)
vocabulary
explanations
and
cues
• Time
on
task
• Teacher
perceptions/hypotheses
• Use
of
a
variety
of
practice
• External
supports
regarding
why
the
student
is
unable
to
and
application
activities
necessary
to
sustain
demonstrate
the
desired
behaviors-‐
• Pace
and
presentation
of
engagement
academic
and/or
behavioral
new
content
• Philosophical
orientation
of
curriculum
(e.g.
whole
language,
phonics)
• Expectations
of
district
for
pacing/coverage
of
curriculum
Problem-‐Solving
using
the
ICEL/RIOT
Matrix
Domain
Variables
Review
Interview
Observe
Test
Curriculum
refers
to
Group/System
Curriculum
selected
Stakeholders
about:
• Peer
group
response
to
Readability/
level
of
text
what
is
taught.
• Presence
of
Core
• scientific
researched
• Core
curriculum
curricular
demands
books
and
other
resources
Scope
and
sequence
Curriculum
based
• Support
curricula
used
for
supplemental
• Target
student
group
would
be
included
• implemented
with
and
intensive
instruction
response
to
curricular
Readability
• Universal
behavior
here
as
well
as
pacing
integrity
• Supplemental
teaching
materials
demands
level/difficulties
of
tests
expectations/PBIS
within
and
between
• integration
of
• Expanded
core
curriculum
(e.g.
• Variety
of
practice
• Staff
training
in
curriculum
Curriculum
topics.
supplemental
and
community
skills,
study
skills)
opportunities
“Things
to
Look
For”
and
• Percentage
of
students
at
intensive
curriculum,
as
• Flexibility
for
teacher
to
modify
curriculum
• Allowance
for
peer
sharing/
“Ask
About”
benchmark/meeting
Is
curriculum
appropriate
• Use
of
data-‐based
decision
making
mentoring
during
work
grade
level
expectations
appropriate
for
• Philosophical
orientation
of
curriculum
time
• Long-‐range
direction
for
student?
Scope
and
sequence
of
(e.g.
whole
language,
phonics,
direct
• Student/peer
response
to
instruction
textbooks
and
other
instruction)
curricular
materials
Consider:
• Alignment
to
standards
resources
• Expectations
of
district
for
pacing
• Types
of
student
• sequencing
of
• Instructional
/coverage
of
curriculum
performance
options:
how
philosophy/approaches
objectives
Permanent
products
• Content/outcomes
of
course
are
students
expected
to
• Instructional
materials
• teaching
methods
(e.g.
books,
worksheets,
• Modifications
of
benchmarks
made
for
demonstrate
the
• materials
provided
• Stated
outcomes
for
the
curriculum
guides)
students
skill/standards?
course
of
study
• difficulty
• Readability
of
textbook
and
other
• presentation
Benchmarks/
Standards
resources
• length
• Individual
• Prerequisite
skills/prior
understanding
• format
• Accommodations
needed
for
success
• relevance
• Supplementary
instruction
• Allowable
repetition
for
• Interventions
mastery/understanding
• Access
to
instruction
• Technology
integration
(time,
attention,
behavior,
• Cultural
competency/relevance
of
the
attendance)
curricular
content
to
student
• Instructional
materials
demographics
• Arrangement
of
the
content/instruction
Problem-‐Solving
using
the
ICEL/RIOT
Matrix
The
family/community
• Resources
to
support
• Student
attendance
record
Parents
about:
• Community
Activities
NOTE:
Direct
environment
is
where
learning
• Parent/guardian
• Sleep
habits
• Club/Sports
Activities
assessments
may
student
spends
time
• Parent
involvement
participation
in
school
• Nutrition/eating
habits
• Peer
interactions
not
be
available
for
outside
of
the
including
talking
to
open
house,
parent
• Homework
space/time
allocation
• Adult-‐student
this
Domain
Family/Community
Problem-‐Solving
using
the
ICEL/RIOT
Matrix
Problem-‐Solving
using
the
ICEL/RIOT
Matrix
Domain
Variables
Review
Interview
Observe
Test
The
learner
is
who
is
• Student’s
current
•Product
vs.
peer
product
Student
about:
• Student’s
learning
style
•“Things
to
Look
For”
and
being
taught.
knowledge,
or
‘prior
• Cumulative
file/
records
• Self-‐perceived
strengths/talents
match
for
instruction
“Ask
About”
knowledge’
• Health
records,
including
• Self-‐perceived
challenges
• Use
of
supportive
•Standardized
academic
This
is
the
last
• Academic
performance
vision
and
hearing
• Ideas
about
what
s/he
needs
technology
assessments
domain
that
is
data
• Teacher’s
grade
book
• Personal
adjustment
• Target
behavior,
• Cognitive
assessments
considered
and
is
Learner
• Attendance
record
• Assignment
notebook
• Beliefs,
self-‐determination
antecedents,
conditions,
• Preference/
interest
only
addressed
when
• Social/behavioral
• Previous
interventions
if
• Peer
group/friends
consequences
inventories
the
curriculum
and
instruction
are
found
performance
data
available
• Mentoring
opportunities
• Dimensions
and
nature
of
• Motivation
scales
to
be
appropriate
and
• Student’s
skills
and
• Patterns
of
performance,
• Club
involvement
the
problem
• Personal
adjustment
&
the
environment
is
motivation
including
attendance,
• Community
Involvement
• Student/group
transitions
behavior
rating
scales
accommodating.
• Curriculum
and
retention,
and
moves
• Home
responsibility
• Large
group
instruction
• Progress
monitoring
instruction
are
• Error
analysis
of
permanent
• Goals
and
aspirations
• Small
group
instruction
• Response
to
Variables
include
appropriate
product
• Independent
work
time
interventions
motivation,
• Student’s
‘ability’,
race,
• Response
to
interventions
Parents
about:
group
work
time
• FBA
-‐
nature
and
prerequisite
skills,
gender
or
family
history
as
reflected
by
systematic
• Health
issues
impacting
learning
• Time
on
task
dimensions
of
behavior
organization/study
progress
monitoring
• Orthopedic
or
neurological
issues
• External
supports
(frequency,
duration,
habits,
abilities,
• Behavior
history
• Hearing/vision
checks
necessary
to
sustain
latency,
intensity),
impairments,
and
• Perceptions
on
learning,
behavior,
engagement
including
anecdotal
notes
history
of
instruction.
speech,
or
motor
difficulties
• Processing
directions
• Physical
fitness
• Family
engagement
in
school
activities
• Cultural
factors
• Physical
health
(e.g.,
homework
support)
• Access
barriers
• Social
emotional
well-‐
• Interactions
being
• Student
effort
checklist