This document discusses the connection between LSDA calculations and model Hamiltonian approaches for describing transition metals and alloys. It notes that while LSDA can accurately describe many properties of ferromagnetic transition metals, it is unclear how to account for band ferromagnetism from the simple Hubbard model. The document suggests that extending the Hubbard model, such as to include many bands or farther neighbor hopping, may allow the Hubbard model to qualitatively capture features seen in LSDA descriptions of iron. Determining the appropriate model to derive from Coulomb interactions will help understand the driving forces behind ordering in transition metals.
This document discusses the connection between LSDA calculations and model Hamiltonian approaches for describing transition metals and alloys. It notes that while LSDA can accurately describe many properties of ferromagnetic transition metals, it is unclear how to account for band ferromagnetism from the simple Hubbard model. The document suggests that extending the Hubbard model, such as to include many bands or farther neighbor hopping, may allow the Hubbard model to qualitatively capture features seen in LSDA descriptions of iron. Determining the appropriate model to derive from Coulomb interactions will help understand the driving forces behind ordering in transition metals.
This document discusses the connection between LSDA calculations and model Hamiltonian approaches for describing transition metals and alloys. It notes that while LSDA can accurately describe many properties of ferromagnetic transition metals, it is unclear how to account for band ferromagnetism from the simple Hubbard model. The document suggests that extending the Hubbard model, such as to include many bands or farther neighbor hopping, may allow the Hubbard model to qualitatively capture features seen in LSDA descriptions of iron. Determining the appropriate model to derive from Coulomb interactions will help understand the driving forces behind ordering in transition metals.
‘electron glue’ is such a complex many-body system that it cannot be
usefully parametrized” [144] - not, if we are so ambitious as to require a unified description of low- and high-energy phenomena, ranging from O.OleV to 100eV. Though the above statement does not exclude the possibility of find- ing a relatively simple low-energy effective Hamiltonian, the fact remains that it is quite difficult to establish the relationship between an LSDA calculation, and the study of a model Hamiltonian with a small local basis, and a few interaction parameters. Let us recall that the Hubbard model was constructed with a single local orbital, and a single inter- action parameter! One studies such, admittedly oversimplified, models in the hope that they allow the identification of the “driving force” of certain types of ordering. The approach is useful only if we have some reason to believe that, after including many more terms into the Hamil- tonian, it becomes realistic enough to describe a system, but the nature of ordering is still basically the same as in the simple model. Assum- ing that this is the case, the understanding gained by working with the simple model is of great value. The problem of the connection between LSDA and Hubbard-model physics has been brought into the focus of attention by the reviving controversy about itinerant ferromagnetism. LSDA has been able to describe many properties of the ferromagnetic iron group elements in impressive detail (Sec. 7.7.4). On the other hand, it is not clear how to account for band ferromagnetism starting from the Hubbard model (Ch. 8). Thus the question can be posed: which is the simplest lattice fermion model which would have the same qualitative features as the LSDA description of iron? We return to a detailed discussion of this question in Ch. 8. There are indications that even the one-band Hubbard model is capable of ferromagnetic ordering in a physically reasonable parameter range if we “fine-tune” the kinetic energy by choosing certain non-bipartite lattices or/and farther-neighbour hopping. Another relevant extension is to degenerate models37, or to many-band models. Time will show which should be derived from the underlying Coulomb force. LSDA has no adjustable interaction parameters. 37These allow to bring into play the intraatomic exhange (responsible for Hund’s