The document discusses the Hubbard model, which describes electron-electron attraction processes in superconductors using a simplified Hamiltonian. While the Hubbard model only considers on-site electron interactions, the true Coulomb interaction is long-ranged and includes various intersite interaction terms. The model assumes charge neutrality by including a compensating background charge from ions that are not explicitly part of the model. The band term in the Hubbard model can be written using a Bloch representation, and can include different band structures beyond just nearest neighbor interactions as long as the hopping terms are expressed in terms of Wannier operators.
The document discusses the Hubbard model, which describes electron-electron attraction processes in superconductors using a simplified Hamiltonian. While the Hubbard model only considers on-site electron interactions, the true Coulomb interaction is long-ranged and includes various intersite interaction terms. The model assumes charge neutrality by including a compensating background charge from ions that are not explicitly part of the model. The band term in the Hubbard model can be written using a Bloch representation, and can include different band structures beyond just nearest neighbor interactions as long as the hopping terms are expressed in terms of Wannier operators.
The document discusses the Hubbard model, which describes electron-electron attraction processes in superconductors using a simplified Hamiltonian. While the Hubbard model only considers on-site electron interactions, the true Coulomb interaction is long-ranged and includes various intersite interaction terms. The model assumes charge neutrality by including a compensating background charge from ions that are not explicitly part of the model. The band term in the Hubbard model can be written using a Bloch representation, and can include different band structures beyond just nearest neighbor interactions as long as the hopping terms are expressed in terms of Wannier operators.
The document discusses the Hubbard model, which describes electron-electron attraction processes in superconductors using a simplified Hamiltonian. While the Hubbard model only considers on-site electron interactions, the true Coulomb interaction is long-ranged and includes various intersite interaction terms. The model assumes charge neutrality by including a compensating background charge from ions that are not explicitly part of the model. The band term in the Hubbard model can be written using a Bloch representation, and can include different band structures beyond just nearest neighbor interactions as long as the hopping terms are expressed in terms of Wannier operators.
BCS model Hamiltonian) which describes a net electron-electron attrac-
tion due to processes which are not characterized in detail. Following this interpretation, the model is used for the description of certain su- perconductors. In contrast to the Hubbard on-site interaction, the true Coulomb interaction is long-ranged. A realistic Hamiltonian should contain lots of intersite terms. The pair terms12 include, in addition to the di- rect Coulomb and (ferromagnetic) exchange interactions, also Coulomb- assisted hopping processes. We should be aware that the inclusion of these terms can lead to new physics. However, this is not systematically explored yet and therefore we will usually stick to the simple Hubbard model (4.10).A trivial point: we may be worried that if the long-range part of the Coulomb force is “switched on”, the system should explode, because it seem to carry a macroscopic total charge. To avoid such a catastrophy, it is understood that whichever electron number we are con- sidering, charge neutrality is guaranteed by a compensating background charge which comes from ions which are not explicitely described in the model. The band term may be rewritten in its (diagonal) Bloch representa- tion xband = ckfiko (4.16) ku without making the form of r(k) explicit. r(k) is easy to express for the nearest-neighbour tight binding model (4.13)but generally, we may admit any band structure r(k) in the Hubbard model, requiring only that 3tu is expressed in terms of the corresponding Wannier operators. We take it for granted that a tight binding parametrization for the band can be found, even if it may necessitate the inclusion of farther- neighbour hoppings. On the other hand, it was somewhat flimsy to assume that only one band appears in the Bloch representation. One customarily speaks of the oneband (or singleband) Hubbard model and writes %!band either as in (4.13)or as in (4.16). However, recent work on Hubbard models on non-Bravais lattices made us conscious of the fact that what we really mean is the singleorbital Hubbard model in which there is only one Wannier state for each site. For Bravais lattices 12Thnv will be discussed in Sec. 5.3.