Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Capello Esrenesto - City at The Center of The World - Completo
Capello Esrenesto - City at The Center of The World - Completo
Ernesto Capello
IS B N 13: 978-0-8229-6166-6
IS B N 10 : 0-8229-6166-0
C ap ello , Ernesto.
C ity at the center o f the w orld : sp ace, history, and m od ern ity in Q u ito / Ernesto Capello.
p. cm . — (Pitt Latin A m e ric a n studies)
In clu d es bibliographical references an d index.
IS B N -13 : 978-0-8229-6166-6 (pbk. : a lk . paper)
IS B N -10 : 0-8229-6166-0 (pbk. : a lk . paper)
1. Q u ito (Ecuador)— H istory. 2. Q u ito (Ecuador)— P op u latio n . 3. Q uito (Ecuador)—
H istoriograph y— Social asp ects. 4. C ollective m em ory— E c u a d o r— Q uito. 5. Historic
p reservatio n — Ecuador— Q u ito — H istory. 6. Place (Philosophy) I. Title.
F 37 8 1.3.C 3 7 2 0 11
9 86.6’i3 — dc23 2011021269
Contents
List o f Illustrations v ii
Acknowledgm ents ix
Prelude xiii
Postscript 2 11
Notes 219
Selected Bibliography 263
Index 283
Illustrations
G ilb e rt, Paul Deslandes, Jerem y D ro sin , Jordana D y m , L au ren Fichtel, M ary
Ellen Fieweger, M oya Foley, S a lly F ran k lin , Juan G arcía, A ld o G arcía-Guevara,
L a rry G u tm a n , Chris and V ick i H artm a n , Dan H aw orth, B ryen Jordan, A n n a
L a b y k in a , Pepo Lapaz, Je ffre y L e ib , Jason Lowery, Jo h a n n a M aron and N ed
S ch o dek , A b b y M cGowan, Terence M urren, Lara N ielsen, th e O rtm an fam ily,
M ick R itte r, Jerem y Sm erd , L e o Sotom ayor, C lay S te in m a n , M ark Stoler,
Patrick T im m o n s, Julio V argas, L u is Vivanco, A lex Z a k a ra s, and Frank Zelko. I
also w ish to th an k m y fam ily, e sp e cia lly Carol Boland, H azel and Ernie Boland,
N ap o C ap elo , Bernice and E . G . C o n k lin , Carol and A la n Perim eter, Jessica
P erim eter an d A nthony C o c h ra n e , L illia n and Jack Perim eter, and N ancy
S u lliv a n a n d M ichael A p ic e lli. M y grandparents C r is tin a and A lejan d rin o
C ap ello were am ong the th o u san d s o f m idcentury p rovin cial m igrants to Quito,
and th eir m em ory was alw ays a n in spiration . M y sistets, C ristin a and E m ily
C ap ello , h ave been com rades a n d intellectual com batants fo r so m any years,
an d I th a n k them for their e m o tio n a l support and th eir cau stic humor. 1 w ish
to th a n k m y parents, the late Jorge C apello and Kathy B o lan d Capello, for that
fo u n d a tio n a l decision to ra ise th e ir ch ildren b in atio n ally, fo r their love and
encouragem en t, and especially fo r en su rin g that there were alw ays books upon
the table, even in lean times.
F in a lly , I w ish to express m y love, gratitude, and a d m iratio n for Rachel
Perim eter. N ot only did she first suggest that I m ight en jo y exploring Q uito’s
h isto ry, b u t she has also d isc u sse d , read, edited, re-read, an d re-edited every
word o f th e dozens o f papers, articles, and m anuscripts th a t have culm inated in
this b o o k . She has patiently en d u red nightly w riting w oes, clarified convoluted
sy n ta x , a n d know n when to encou rage m y more fa n c ifu l ideas and when to let
th em d issip ate. She is sim ply th e m o st beautiful,' stim u la tin g , and dedicated
person I h ave ever known.
Prelude
echelon o f Q uito’s diplom atic and ad m in istrative corps had gathered n ear the
sm all town o f S a n A n to n io de Pichincha, tw en ty-seven kilom eters n o rth o f
the Ecuadorian ca p ita l. The dusty desert la n d sca p e contrasted sh arp ly w ith
the elegant co attails an d stovepipe hats o f th ese lu m inaries, whose presence
graced a site where eighteenth-century French geographer Charles M a rie d e La
Condam ine had erected a com memorative p y ra m id , destroyed in 1747 b y order
o f the Spanish C row n due to its inclusion o f the French fleur-de-lis. F lan k ed by
m ustachioed French colonel Georges Perrier, actin g president and som etim es
d ictator Federico Paez dedicated a new m o n u m en t, based upon the o rig in a l,
to celebrate the bicentennial o f the original m issio n . Designed by L u is T u fin o ,
m ilitary cartographer and director o f the N atio n al Observatory, the m onu m ent
site would become a to u rist complex know n as the M itad del M undo (m eaning
m iddle or center o f th e world) and a key com po n en t in the developm ent o f a
regional tourist in d u stry trading upon the ca p ita l’s equatorial location.
The previous decade, am ateur photographer G u illerm o Illescas d ocum en ted
th e Chim bacalle tra in station in Q uito’s so u th ern environs (fig. 0.1). O ne o f
h is photographs, m o st lik ely posed, is d o m in a ted b y the outward g aze o f a
hardened indigenous m an who sits on the cu rb w ith bare feet outstretched w hile
he carefully clutches a c ru st o f bread in his rig h t h an d , which is cradled in his
left, as one m ight receive Com m union. The b ro ad brim o f his coarse w h ite h at
shields his eyes, w h ile a rope emerges from h is p onch o to advertise his profession
as a porter. W om en su rrou n d him on either side. The older w om an, p ossib ly
h is wife, and the yo u n g wom an, possibly h is daughter, bow their heads as th ey
reach for items fro m th e gunnysacks at their feet while a young boy in a flo pp y
black hat pleads fo r a m orsel from the girl, p resu m ably his mother. B eh in d the
fam ily stand representatives o f the city’s m otley population— an elderly beggar
w om an hiding u n d e r a crum pled fedora, tw o chalina-clad girls ch attin g over
bags o f produce, an d a light-skinned dandy. T h is last figure completes Illescas’s
critiq ue o f the c ity ’s stagn an t inequality; th e m a n ’s three-piece su it, w a lk in g
stick , cigarette h old er, an d apparent p o m p o sity desperately co n trad ict the
poverty-stricken scene at his feet. He is a sy m b o l o f fashionable m o d e rn ity in
an unchanging society.
The porter and h is fam ily, however, also p articip ate as active agents in the
c ity ’s shifting m o d ern p u lse by virtu e o f th e ir engagem ent with the lo a d in g
and unloading o f tra in cars at a railroad statio n , a little more than a decade
old , which conn ected Q uito to the port o f G u a y a q u il and thus to th e w orld
econom y. The p h o to g ra p h e r’s vision o f h is to ry b elies this d y n a m ism an d
accentuates stagn atio n , a stance contradicted b y the lived experience o f h is
subject (the porter). T h is rhetorical (re)production o f tradition pregnan t w ith
social denunciations itse lf corresponds to tropes advocated not only b y Illescas
but also, increasingly, b y other activists skeptical o f the tenets o f m odern ization
and progress tru m peted by elites and state b u ild ers. Yet the construct itse lf also
exists as sim ulacrum in a city far from the global core.
Prelude / xv
Fig. 0 .1. G uillerm o Ille sc a s, "U n titled " (c. early 1920s). C o u rte sy A rch ivo H istórico, B an co C e n
tral del Ecuador.
operated among v a rio u s elem ents o f society d id not prevent change bu t in stead
w ere essentially g en erative, enabling in d iv id u a ls an d collectives fro m across
sociopolitical h ierarch ies to position th em selves in a global and in c rea sin g ly
local m arketplace w h ere h isto ry could serve as b o th resource and p olitical tool.
B y embracing and p e d d lin g visions o f the city as m u seu m , as phan tasm agoria,
or as allegorical rep o sito ry o f universal C ath o licism , these groups, in stitu tio n s,
fa m ilie s, and c o m m u n itie s defined and created a Q uito respond in g to an d
rooted in a “ historic” identity.
T hese c o n stru ctio n s represented m od ern in ven tio n s, to be sure, b u t not
solely o f the sta te-d rive n form o f n ation alist p o litic a l theater tied to o fficial
p agean try and in ven ted h olidays described b y E ric Hobsbawrfi an d T erence
R an ger, though th ese c e rta in ly played a p a r t.2 In stead , the rein ven tio n s o f
Q u ito ’s colonial p a st rep resen t d ialogical p rocesses involving re-en co un ters
w ith tenets som etim es centuries old or on ly gen eration s rem oved fro m th eir
o rig in . The actors m o st involved in these d isc u rsiv e form ulations p rim a rily
cam e from the city’s trad itio n al elite but also in clu d ed sh iftin g constellations o f
in d ivid u als, fam ilies, m ig ra n ts, and even in d igen ou s com m unities w ell aware
o f the power inherent in controlling history. T h ese salient re-im aginings o f the
c ity ’s past thus d em onstrate not only the role o f tradition as a generating force in
quiteño m odernity b u t a lso the dynam ism and resilience o f an urban p o p u latio n
contending with ra d ica l change.3
T h e series o f lenses I use to exam ine this d ia lo g ical process are d eterm in ed
b y p articular n arrative configurations o f space an d tim e, or what the R u ssia n
c ritic M ik h ail B a k h tin c a lls the chronotope (literally, space-tim e).4 B a k h tin
argues that chronotopes determ ine the scope an d style o f a given literary genre
b y co d ifyin g a m ea n s o f apprehending and m o v in g through space w ith in a
tem poral trajectory. F o r exam ple, classical ad ven tu re m yth s featu re a h ero
traversing m ultiple la n d sca p es w ith little a tten tio n to a realistic ch ro n o lo g y
w h ile folktales depend o n the irruption o f idyllic q uietud e by the carn ivalesqu e
presence o f rogues, fo o ls, or buffoons. He a d d s th at these genres con cretize
social relations by v irtu e o f their repetition, in a m an n er rem iniscent o f M au rice
H albw achs s views o f collective mem ory.5 Like B ak h tin , Halbwachs argu es that
a group fram ed b y sh ared encounters d epends u p o n constant (re)affirm ation
o f their collective m em o ries, languages, and cod es. O nly through reiteration
can the collective con tin u e to exist. This process depends on proxim ity, re g u la r
engagem ent, cod ifiable term inology, com m on locales, and dialogue. M e m o ry
thus becomes spatial a n d tangible in its form u lation but also contingent u p o n a
discursive and d ialo g ical process.
D urin g the fin-de-siglo, Q uito becam e th e site and the b ackd ro p to th e
creation o f a n u m b er o f groups whose a rtic u la tio n as com m u nities h elp ed
determ ine the shape a n d character o f their city, ju st as they were th em selves
constructed by their environm ent. This stu d y addresses the c rystallizatio n o f
six m ajor chronotopes, th a t is, six critical acts o f com prehending, con stru ctin g,
Prelude / xvii
and explaining Q u ito’s u rb an m ilieu that w ould prove to be o f lasting cu ltu ral
and social im port.6 E ach resonates with ancient m ean in g yet crystallized in the
specific historical age associated with the c it y ’s tw entieth-céntury upheaval.
T h e book suggests th a t each chronotope p la c e d the historical experience o f
a p articular group o f in d ivid u a l and collective actors at the center o f a global
m etan arrative.7 T h e selective deploym ent o f th ese collective m yth o lo gies
accentuated the p ow er, econom ic strength , a n d v e rsa tility o f the grou p s in
question, which in clu d e elite H ispanist in te lle c tu a ls, m ilitary cartographers,
the m em bers o f a n in d igen o u s com m une, a n d a fa m ily o f im m igrant Sw iss-
Italian architects. F ro m these various p osition s, each group claim ed the right
to reinvent Q uito’s geograph ic form and h isto ry on its own term s. B y tracing
each chronotope’s o rig in s and reflecting u p on th e ir contem porary resonance,
the book reveals h ow th e plasticity o f h isto ry and m em ory has (re)shaped the
spatial and cultural lan d scap e o f the city to the present day.
M y exploration b e g in s w ith a ch ap ter p ro v id in g a panoram ic v iew o f
Q uito’s fin-de-siglo h is to ry that seeks to locate th is m om ent w ithin the context
o f extended regio n alist discourses. C itizen sh ip (vecindad) in colonial Span ish
A m erica associated lo c a l urban identity w ith belon gin g to a universal corpus
such as the Spanish n ation or the Catholic C h u rc h .8 1 locate the cru cial nature
o f regionalist p o litic s an d poetics in E c u a d o r’s postcolonial h isto ry as an
outgrowth o f th is b ifu rc a te d form ulation o f collective identity. There follows
a broader d iscu ssio n o f the rivalry betw een E c u a d o r’s coastal and A n d ea n
regions in the n in eteen th and early tw entieth cen turies. I particu larly focu s
on the degree to w h ich aspirations toward u n iv e rsa lity colored expressions o f
regional identity th at w ere sim ilar to colonial notions o f citizenship. Extending
the analysis o f K im C la rk , who has argued th a t the Liberal program in Ecu ador
was tinged with m etaph ors equating the coast w ith progress and the A n d es w ith
stagnation, I m a in ta in th at the Liberal R evolu tio n proponents’ concern w ith
positivist narratives necessitated a reh abilitated im age o f Quito as a h isto ric
center.9 The stirrin gs o f nostalgic regionalism as national phenomena m arked
the configurations o f actors, identities, and spaces th at developed in the w ake o f
Liberal reform s.
I subsequently trace th e intellectual a n d p olitical genealogy that gave rise
to fin-de-siglo attem p ts b y discrete segm ents o f quiteño society to lay claim to
the city’s essential id en tity by elaborating u n iversalizin g chronotopes. I locate
the colonial and nineteenth-cen tury p recu rsors o f these totalizing discourses
by following an arch aeological approach th at acknowledges the internal logic o f
each chronotope w h ile underscoring its contingency. The narratives crafted in
the early twentieth cen tu ry deployed and m an ip u lated these earlier fram ew orks
yet should be considered m anipulations an d inventions by specific collectives o f
actors seeking to estab lish footholds o f know ledge, power, or economic vitality
w ith in a rapidly m o d e rn iz in g city. I also h ig h lig h t the traces o f chronotope
form ation and th eir continued sociocultural im port in the contem porary city.
xviii\ Prelude
incorporation w h ile sim ultaneously m an ipu latin g land histories and com m unal
genealogy to su sta in both a m easure o f autonom y and relative in tern al stability.
M y d is c u s sio n o f these p ara lle l ch ron otopical n arratives ch allen ges the
traditional h isto rio grap h y o f Q uito, w h ich has largely considered th is m om ent
as a ly n c h p in in the developm ent o f m od ern class identity. T h e im po rtan t
works o f L u c a s A ch ig and F ern an d o C a rrio n , for instance, b u ild on M anuel
C astells’s in flu e n tia l observation th a t th e m odernization o f u rb a n form and
construction o f m onum ental avenues à la the Cham ps-Elysées in th e fin-de-siglo
Latin A m e ric a n city demarcated zones o f elite hegem ony an d lim ited subaltern
access to th e centers o f power.10 O th ers, including G u illerm o B u stos, M ilton
Luna, and M a n u e l Espinosa A polo, h ave extended this an alysis to questions o f
cultural o r ra c ia l identity, again su b ord in ated to class.“ W h ile m y stu d v does
not contradict these authors’ conclusions th at race and class severely constrained
an in d iv id u a l’s social p o ssib ilities, it d oes suggest th at c o rp o ra te identity
was e xtrem ely flu id and m u ltivocal. A s such, this work has m ore in com m on
with E d u a rd o K in gm an ’s exh a u stive stu d y o f urban h ygien e th a t attem pts
to situate Q u ito ’s spatial alterations betw een i860 and 1940 as ou tgrow ths o f
sh ifting e lite visio n s o f the u rb an polis, in w hich the id en tificatio n o f place
with class is p aram o u n t.12 H ow ever, it also questions the co n tin u e d support
K ingm an d isp la y s for Castells’s b asic presupposition o f collusio n am ong elites
and in te lle c tu a ls hoping to prove th e ir “m odern” cred entials th rou gh urban
p lan n in g.13 I m ain ta in that n o th in g c o u ld be fu rth e r fro m th e tru th , as the
upper class exh ibited a su m m arily am b ivalen t attitude tow ard a m ovem ent that
fu n d am en tally challenged their trad itio n al prerogatives.
T his b o o k a lso seeks to advance a broad er understanding o f th e dialectical
relatio n sh ip betw een “ tradition” a n d “p rogress” in the fo rm a tio n o f Latin
A m erican cities. A lthough early a n a ly sts o f the urban h isto ry o f L atin A m erica,
p articu larly Jorge H ardoy and R ic h a rd M orse, attended to c u ltu ra l resonance
between th e colonial and m odern cities, the question o f the im p act o f cultural
mores did n o t receive substantive critic ism u ntil the late tw en tieth cen tury.14
This situ atio n h as begun to change; scholars such as M auricio Tenorio, M arisol
de la C a d e n a , an d M ark O verm yer-V elâzquez have h igh ligh ted th e economic
and p olitical benefits o f adopting a “ trad itio n alist” urban im a g in a ry .15 M y work
seeks to b u ild up on the insights o f th ese studies b y dem onstrating the degree to
which “ h is to ry ” proved a tradable com m od ity that provided a pliable blueprint
for the co n stru ctio n o f m odern Q u ito. I thus hope to illu m in a te the degree to
which even a q u ain t polis, som etim es thought o f as “ backw ard ” and “ isolated,”
refram ed th e parad igm s o f m od ern ity an d established its righ t to b e considered
not only a g lo b a l capital but, indeed, the city at the center o f th e w orld .16
City at thè Center of thè World
Chapter 1
Fig. 1 .1 . L a s Colonias P rom enade, G u a yaq u il. C ourtesy L ib ra ry o f C o n gress, Prints & Photo
g ra p h s D iv isio n , lot 2779.
Fig. 1 .2 . L a s Penas, G u ayaq u il. C o u rte sy Library o f C ongress, P rin ts & Photographs D ivision,
lot 2779.
in stitu tio n dating to 1651), w h ile the rem aining nin eteen featu re colonial-era
churches.
T ak en as a set, the p ostcard s serve as a panoram ic perfo rm an ce o f regional
stereotyp es. G uayaquil is offered to the m odern to u rist eager to stroll along a
p ro m en ad e w ith lovely y o u n g girls in spring dresses (fig. 1.1) and represented
b y a ga lla n t, im ported fro m im pressionist A rgenteuil, w h o prepares to launch a
yach t at the “ tourist p arad ise ” o f Las Peñas (fig. 1.2). Q u ito, m eanwhile, seem s
The Politics and Poetics o f Regionalism / 3
Fig. 1.3 . San Francisco C onvent, Q u ito . C ourtesy Library o f C on gress, P rin ts & Photographs
D iv is io n , lot 2779.
Fig. 1.4 . Surroundings o f Q uito. C o u rte sy Library o f C ongress, P rin ts & Photographs D ivision,
lo t 2779.
o f the best preserved colonial centers in S o u th Am erica), the rhetoric a lso exhib
its a more d eliberate plan to capitalize on a d en ial o f coevalness.1 T h e postcard
text, presented in both English and S p a n ish on the back o f each c a rd , crystal
lizes this schem atic (table 1.1). G u ayaqu il is fram ed as a favorable bu sin ess zone,
with con tem p orary architecture and c u ltiva te d urban green space, where one
receives the “m o d ern conveniences o f o u r cities” and “ the favorable curren cy
exchange rate . . . at 15 sucres per d o lla r.” T h e m ajesty o f Q uito, on th e other
hand, signifies th e “ land o f h istory and trad ition , land o f ancient a n d colonial
a rt” where one can “see the celebrated churches o f San Francisco, L a C om pañ ía,
La M erced.”
This presentation o f G uayaquil an d Q u ito as the sym bolic, p o litic a l, eco
nomic, and so cial engineers o f region al identities b y no m eans exp ressed the
contem porary or, worse, the h isto rical situ atio n o f E cu ado rian regio n alism .
Instead, it d isp lays a particularly b an al attem p t to profit from conventions that,
by the 1930s, h ad becom e com m onplace in a coun try that had lon g sought to
overcome th e econom ic and political riv a lry o f these two centers. T h ese rivalries
arose in the p olitics and poetics o f region alism from the colonial p erio d into the
The Politics and Poetics o f Regionalism / 5
early tw entieth cen tury. In the com plex relationsh ip between locality, collective
identity, and citizen sh ip , there existed a p rocess whereby a m u ltip o la r colony
dom inated b y th e Q uito m arketplace b ecam e transform ed,- at le ast o fficially,
into a biregion al n ation coalescing aro u n d th e poles o f Quito and G u a y a q u il.
It was this p rocess th at necessitated th e d isp u ta tio n o f Q uito’s p a st an d th at
was itself in fo rm e d b y that com petition to control the city’s fram e. E m b racin g
the identification o f the city with a now m yth olo gized past m ade it possible to
challenge G u a y a q u il’s preeminence as a n atio n al site o f m odernity. In d eed , this
potentiality allow ed Q uito to claim a global signification dating back to the six
teenth cen tu ry— a h istory that could propel the city toward future glories.
conquistas p u rgin g o f M oorish and Jewish p op u latio n s. Sim ilar civic stru ctu res
were instituted in the A m ericas but were so o n altered due to sh iftin g c ircu m
stances— for in sta n ce , residence requ irem ents d im in ish ed in im p o rta n ce in
areas that h ad b e en settled by Europeans fo r o n ly a short time. In stea d , racial
and at times econom ic distinctions between vecinos becam e established, even as
kinship networks continued to link in d ivid u als across regions according to their
com m on origins in Europe.2
The stru c tu ra l im portance o f locating o n e’s belonging in a c o m m u n ity o f
vecinos in a p a rtic u la r city first and extending th at m em bership to one’s place in
a national (Spanish) or universal (Catholic) c o rp u s nevertheless shaped Sp an ish
A m erican considerations o f vecindad. A t tim es, these sentiments becam e m an i
fest in panegyrics establishing what R ich ard K a g an has term ed “com m u n icen -
tric” representations o f urban com m unities. T h e se were expressions o f belong
ing in which in d iv id u a ls and corporations q u a lifie d the particular c h aracteris
tics that denoted m em bership in their c o m m u n ity o f urban dwellers. E xam p les
include patron sa in ts (of which M exico C ity ’s V irg in o f G uadalupe is th e best
known), urban view s featu ring prom inent citiz en s, allegorical lan d scap es, and
illustrations o f lead in g economic enterprises su ch as P otosfs silver m in e s.3 Such
im ages are ancestors o f the peculiar depictions o f Q uito that would b e adopted
and reim agined d u rin g the fin de siglo. T h is is p articu larly true o f th e H isp an
ist ones, w hich d ire c tly referenced the co lo n ial heritage in p rom oting Q u ito’s
hidebound character.
The geography o f a colonial Spanish A m e ric a n city thus established radiat
ing categories o f pow er and belonging accord in g to spatial, racial, an d aesthetic
segregation. W h ile th is ideal pattern was e asily sketched on paper an d zealou sly
guarded in new ly b u ilt centers such as L im a , it w as increasingly d ifficu lt to ad
m inister in areas w ith existing indigenous p o p u latio n s.4
Quito’s h isto ry serves as a case in point. A s a northern Incaic stronghold and
the birthplace o f th e em peror Atahualpa, the A n d ea n citadel o f Q uito attracted
the attention o f conquistadors in the m id st o f the wars o f the Conquest. O ne o f
Pizarro’s origin al p artn ers, Diego de A lm a g ro , established a charter fo r the city
in A ugust 1534 soon a fter decisively defeating A tah u alp a’s lieutenant, R u m iñ a-
hui, near present-day Riobam ba in central E cu ad o r. A lm agro’s envoy, Seb astián
de Benalcázar, entered Quito on Decem ber 6, too late to save its legen d ary trea
sures and the g ran d im perial palaces from th e b laze set by the retreating Incan
arm ies. The con q u istad o r drew the first traza, or central grid, am ong th e ashes
and consecrated th e city to Saint Francis. D espite the m onum ental possibilities
o f developing the great A ñaquito plains to th e no rth , Benalcázar e m u lated his
Incan forebears b y exploitin g the m ilitary advantages o f the steep h ills , deep
ravines, and n arrow approach o f the o rigin al site. A substantial q u an tity o f raw
m aterial for con stru ction also lay am ong the ru in s o f the old city. T h e Fran cis
can m onastery th a t began to rise in 1535, for in stan ce, incorporated th e rem ains
The Politics and Poetics o f Regionalism / 7
o f the great Incaic T em p le o f the Sun, w hich h a d m ade the city the m ost splen
d id in the north ern A n d e s . T h u s, from th e s ta rt, colonial Quito existed as a
hybrid space where v a rio u s elements com peted for predom inance.
The uneven to p ograp h y and existing po p u latio n also altered the spatial and
social m ap o f the new c ity from the Spanish id eal. T he grid m orphed to conform
to the rough terrain a n d w as interrupted in n um erous places by rush ing creeks.
Settlem ent p atterns q u ic k ly abandoned the id eal rad ial structure and instead
adopted a pattern rem in iscen t o f the Incaic up per-h alf/low er-h alf dichotom y.
The parish o f El S ag ra rio replaced the “up per” section that had housed the In ca
nobility, the Tem ple o f th e Su n , and the p alace constructed by A tah u alpa’s fa
ther, Huayna C ap ac. T h ere, the new sym b ols o f Sp an ish power congregated,
including the Fran ciscan m onastery, the cabild o, the cathedral, the parish seat,
and elite residences. T o the east, downhill, la y the u rb an parishes o f S an Sebas
tián and San Bias, region s that were reserved fo r indigenous dwellings and that
had previously h o u se d th e lower strata o f In caic Q uito. Even this socioracial
segregation changed over the course o f the seventeenth century as the city grew
to perhaps as m an y as fift y thousand in h abitan ts d u rin g the height o f colonial
power.5 Indigenous h ou sehold s, for exam ple, b egan to stray westw ard to the
upper slopes o f M o u n t Pichincha in the p arish es o f S an Roque and San ta B ár
bara, drawn b y th e con stru ction o f the F ran cisca n m onastery and its a rtisan
workshops.
A shifting local an d regional economy influ enced these new settlem ent pat
terns. D uring the six te e n th century, econom ic developm ent in the A u d ien cia
o f Quito had been d om in ated by gold m in in g . M ajo r m ines lay at Z a ru m a , in
the contem porary southw estern province o f El O ro, and at A lm agu er, near the
northern city o f P o payán in present-day C olom bia. The Z aru m a m ines petered
out in the 1590s, a n d , w h ile A lm aguer lasted a few years longer, by the tu rn o f
the century the A u d ie n cia was facing a p o ten tially grave economic crisis. T hese
economic pressures to ok on a political d im en sion because creoles resented the
viceregal im position o f an alcabala, or sales ta x , in 1592. T h is crisis led to the
expulsion o f the A u d ien cia president by a rebelliou s cabildo, a move that in tu rn
inspired arm ed intervention by a viceregal m ilitia and the curtailing o f cabildo
autonom y in subsequ en t decades.6
The region slow ly recovered from this crisis a fter the textile sector began to
expand. Local entrepreneu rs embraced the obraje system , in which sweatshops
staffed by indigenous workers produced cheap w oolen goods for sale throughout
the Andean em pire, as far north as Panam a and as far south as Chile. The p io
neers o f this system , su ch as Cham bo-based encomendero (labor grant recipient)
Rodrigo de R ib ad en eira, capitalized on th eir w an in g access to free indigenous
labor to supply th e em erging m arket at the great silver m ines at Potosí, w hich
had become the en gin e not only o f the S p a n ish im perial economy d u rin g the
late sixteenth cen tu ry but would also subsidize the expansion o f European e n
8 \ The Politics and Poetics o f Regionalism
terp rise into the huge A sian m arket o f that era.7 T h e success o f entrepreneurs
like Ribadeneira gave rise to a series o f other obrajes throu gh out the region, p ar
ticu larly near the cities o f L atacu n ga, Quito, and O tavalo.
Q u ito ’s expansion in the seventeenth century w as p a rtly due to regional
d em ographic recovery as w ell as its dual role as an a d m in istrative center an d
as a m arketplace.8 The city’s p lazas drew merchants fro m throughout the A n
dean corridor as well as from th e fertile Chillo and T u m b a c o valleys to the east,
which also were home to im p o rtan t obrajes. A nother increasin gly im portant in
d u stry, the production o f religious art, began to develop sim ultaneously. Q uito
had been established as a bishopric in 1545, it became the seat o f an Audiencia in
1563, an d it soon came to h ou se the regional headqu arters for both the regular
and secu lar clergy. The Fran ciscan s took the lead in tra in in g local artisans d e
voted to producing icons, scu lp tu re, and painting.
T h is process began th rou gh the efforts o f Friar Jo d o co R icke in the 1540s
and continued with the introduction o f a num ber o f scu lptors from Seville and
G ran ad a in the late sixteenth cen tury. These trained a rtisa n s constructed the
largest religious complex in S o u th A m erica, the San Fran cisco monastery. Its
8.6 acres included a convent six patios deep (see fig. 1.3). T h e m ain façade, a
m asterpiece o f Spanish A m erican baroque, emulated Ju a n de Herrera’s m ajestic
fortress o f El Escorial while th e interior incorporated su b tle indigenous m otifs
in gold leaf.9 By the end o f the century, Quito’s artwork b egan to travel— indeed,
the oldest extant A m erican p ain tin g is a portrait o f th ree m ulatto lords from
the E cuadorian port o f E sm erald as painted in 1599 b y th e Q uito m aster A ndrés
Sanchez G allque and sent to M a d rid as a gift for Ph ilip I I .10
T h e “Q uito school” o f polychrom atic sculpture exp lod ed during the seven
teenth century. In addition to th e workshops m ain tain ed b y the Franciscans,
a n u m b e r o f com peting co n ce rn s arose in conn ection w ith the D om inican
m on astery on the city’s southeastern edge. The secu lar clergy and other orders
follow ed, including Jesuits, D o m in ican s, and C arm elite n u n s, among others.
T h eir m yriad churches h elped em ploy num erous a rtisa n s, p articularly at the
Jesu its’ convent (1605-1765), w h ich brought the city great renow n for its extraor
d in a rily opulent gold leaf ad orn m en t o f the nave and th e retablo. The sculpture
itse lf traveled the extent o f th e A u d ien cias ju risd iction an d was soon revered
throughout the empire for its d elicacy and fine d etail."
T h u s, b y the seventeenth cen tury, Quito had not o n ly becom e an economic
and adm inistrative center but h ad also crafted a region ally renowned reputation
as a n artistic haven accentuated b y religiosity— a c ity o f G o d , or even a new
R o m e.12 However, the eighteenth century brought a sta g n a n t economy and a
notorious challenge to the c ity ’s cultured image abroad. T h e latter had arisen
largely due to the Fran co-H ispanic Geodesic M ission (1736—1745), a scientific
voyage to m easure the arc o f th e Q uito m eridian to a n sw er a dispute about the
shape o f the Earth.13 The French academ ician Charles M a rie de L a Condam ine
and the Spaniards Jorge Ju a n an d A ntonio de U lloa su b seq u en tly penned ac
T h e Politics and Poetics o f R egionalism / 9
counts o f th eir travels in the Q uito region. La Condam ine’s acco u n ts o f his cel
ebrated trek d ow n the A m azon p roved an instan t success in E u ro p e, not only
because o f the exotic nature o f th e tro p ica l flora and fau n a h e d escrib ed but
also becau se o f h is vivid em phasis on th e barbaric qualities o f Q u ito natives. He
was p artic u la rly critical o f the ind igen ou s population— w ith w h o m he could not
com m unicate— and also stressed th e g o ry details o f a m urder he h a d witnessed
in a p u b lic p la z a in the southern c ity o f C u en ca.'4 Iron ically, th e geographic
study th at w as to have firm ly p laced Q u ito w ith in the corpu s o f m o d ern cities
thus served to underm ine its claim to a progressive spirit in k eep in g w ith con
tem porary European social attitudes.
L a C o n d am in e ’s critiques represented a m ajor em barrassm ent to the Quito
elite, w ho w ere sim ultaneously u n d ergo in g other troubles due to prolonged eco
nomic w oes occasioned by the severe declin e o f Potosí m in in g . T h e erosion o f
the Potosí m arket m ade Q uito’s obrajes dependent on L im a’s app etite fo r lu xu ry
textiles. M oreover, a cen tu ry-lon g p rocess o f ad m in istrative reorgan ization
collectively k n ow n as the B ourbon R e fo rm s opened up A m e ric a n p orts to non-
Iberian trad e for the first time. T h is restru ctu rin g ham pered Q u ito ’s textile ex
ports as a flo o d o f inexpensive, h igh -grad e French cloth u n d ercu t its product in
the viceregal capital. W hile the cheap woolens that were p roduced in th e north
ern regions o f the A udiencia con tin u ed to be distributed th rou gh ou t the rest o f
the V ice ro y a lty o f New G ran ad a, u n d e r whose ju risdiction th e A u d ien cia had
been p laced in 1739, Quito u n d erw en t a serious slump. A series o f plagues hit
the city in th e 1750s, exacerbating its problem s. When the vicero yalty attem pted
to exp an d th e alcabala on aguardiente— sugarcane liquor— in 1765 follow ing the
d ecim ation o f the im perial trea su ry due to the Seven Years’ W ar, a w idespread
and cro ss-c la ss rebellion broke ou t, w h ich anticipated the better-k n o w n T u
pac A m a r u an d Tupac K atari u p risin g s o f the 1780s. In ad d itio n , the so-called
Rebellion o f the Barrios affected relatio n s between urban officials and the su r
round ing indigenous population.*5
T h u s, as the colonial era w a n e d , Q uitó was entering a p erio d o f pro
found c risis. T h e uncertainty en couraged widespread m igratio n fro m the tor
m ented city. Th ose departing represented a ll classes and races, an d the loss o f
p op ulatio n v irtu a lly froze the c ity in tim e as new construction stagnated over
the next cen tu ry. This m ass m igratio n also affected the su bseq uent grow th o f
regional c o n flicts as Cuenca and th e p o rt o f G uayaquil b o o m ed due to their
em brace o f the capitalist p ossibilities offered by trade deregu lation. Cuenca de
veloped as an im portant center for q u in in e harvesting and m illin e ry production
while G u a y a q u il’s nascent sh ip b u ild in g in d u stry fueled the c ity ’s rise as a major
cacao p o rt. T h e sh ift in econom ic a n d population concentration bred serious
regional com petition between the th ree urban centers over th e n ext century, and
this ten sio n soon becam e in scrib ed in cu ltu ral and p olitical w ars th at d om i
nated the nation’s politics and p oetics during the nineteenth century.
io \ T h e Politics and Poetics o f R egionalism
B y th e late eighteenth cen tu ry, th e econom ic and c u ltu ra l m odel that had
p revailed in colonial Quito h a d fa lle n victim to cen trifu gal pressure. Local crit
ics, how ever, continued to argue fo r im p erial reform rather th a n structural ad
ju stm e n ts designed to m ake th e lo ca l econom y more com petitive. Perhaps the
m ost strid en t voice was that o f quiteño doctor Eugenio E sp ejo , whose m any sa
tirical w ritin g s located the co n tem p o rary crisis w ithin th e scholastic pedagogy
o f th e Je su it population and th e lim ited developm ent o f lo ca l m edicine. The
Q uito cen sors tolerated these w o rks becau se o f im perial ant ip ath y toward the Je
suits, w h o were expelled from th e em pire in 1767, but th ey reacted quickly when
Espejo tu rn e d h is attention to C h a rle s III and José de G á lv e z , m in ister o f the
Indies, in h is polem ical tract Retrato de golilla (Portrait o f a M agistrate). Arrested
in 1788 a n d sent to Bogotá, E spejo an d h is politics becam e rad icalized. On his
retu rn to Q uito, he form ed the p atrio tic society A m igos d el Pais, one o f several
across S o u th A m erica that a gitated fo r greater local au to n om y and the exten
sion o f th e franchise to subaltern grou p s without ch allenging Catholic religious
d o m in a n ce .16 Despite his attention to Q uito’s particular foibles, however, Espejo
c o n tin u ed to conceive o f the crisis as one stem m ing from im p e ria l decadence in
the face o f a global political, p ed ago g ical, and scientific tu rn .
M ean w h ile, regional econom ic tensions increasingly affe cted political rela
tions w ith th e Crow n. G u a y a q u il a n d Cuenca had been n a m ed separate prov
inces o r gobernaciones during the m id-eighteenth century, a designation that gave
th em greater control over in tern al a ffa irs. Despite C u en ca’s larger population,
G u a y a q u il’s risin g cacao trade w ith N ew Spain accelerated its statu s, inspiring a
royal d ecree that gave the V icero yalty o f Peru authority over the p o rt’s economic
a ffa irs. T h e ind ignity o f this m ea su re w as a key reason Q u ito becam e the site
for one o f the first resistance ju n ta s in the afterm ath o f N apoleon’s invasion o f
the Ib eria n Peninsula. Led by th e M arqu es de Selva A legre, Ju a n Pío M ontufar,
the con sp irators behind the ju n ta , proclaim ed on A u gu st 10 ,18 0 9 , deposed the
p residen t o f the A udiencia, C o u n t R u iz de C astilla. T h e ir ca ll to the other ju
risd ictio n s o f the A udiencia to jo in in p roclaim ing independence was met with
am b ivalen ce in Cuenca, G u a y a q u il, and Popayán, however, w hich ensured the
failu re o f th is first movem ent, the incarceration o f the o rig in a l conspirators, and
th eir execu tio n in A ugust 18 10 . A second independence m ovem en t erupted in
Q u ito la te r th at m onth, led b y a n ow d isgru n tled R u iz de C a stilla in alliance
w ith A rch bish op Pedro Cuero y C aiced o. A gain, the region alist divide was made
m a n ife st as G uayaquil and C u en ca rem ained loyalist centers over the next two
years, a situation accentuated b y th e V iceroyalty o f Peru’s fo rm a l annexation o f
G u a ya q u il.
The Politics and Poetics o f Regionalism / 11
m agistrate nam ed G ab riel G arcía Moreno, w h ose extended argum ents in favor
o f greater centralization and bolstering C ath o lic power provided a p oten tial re
sponse to national fragm entation.
A onetime lib e ra l and native o f G u a y a q u il, G arcía Moreno h ad lo n g been
one o f the forem ost advocates for renew ing th e national com m itm en t to the
Catholic Church. H is positions had put h im at loggerheads with the anticlerical
governm ents o f the 1840s, leading to a period o f European exile du ring w h ich he
witnessed the aftereffects o f the 1848 revolutions. A return visit to Fran ce in 1854
solidified hiS’ favorable im pression o f the autocratic regime o f Napoleon III, who
would later be in vited to annex the A nd ean n a tio n b y his conservative ad m irer
at a moment o f p artic u la r despair. García M oren o becam e active in Q u ito’s m u
nicipal politics in 1857 and was also selected to b e rector o f the city’s u niversity.
Upon ascending to the presidency in 1861 he im m ed iately set about q u ellin g the
regional forces th at h ad threatened to split a p a rt the country while en h an cin g
the Catholic credentials o f the nation.
G arcía M oren o’s re fo rm s resurrected m o d ifie d versions o f a n u m b e r o f
structures o f colonial life inflected with a cen tralized autocracy insp ired b y the
French emperor. L ik e U rb ina before him , G a rc ía M oreno turned to the p ro v in
cial authorities to tackle the thorny regional d ivid e s, expanding the n u m b e r o f
provincial ad m in istrators and increasing th e ir influence while erad icatin g the
d istrict system altogether. This policy again served local landholding interests,
particularly in the A n d ea n corridor, which w as gran ted a majority o f p rovin cial
delegations. The m ove also lim ited the pow er o f the three major u rb an centers.
Cuenca was p articu la rly dim inished; its o rig in a l ju risdiction had in clu d ed the
m ost populous areas in the country. H enceforth, the city would be m argin alized
b y a central go vern m en t increasingly d o m in a ted b y the port and th e capital.
Paradoxically, G a rcía M oreno increased th e au tonom y o f local m u n icip alities
in a m anner sim ilar to th e Spanish H absburg im p erial system o f the sixteen th
an d seventeenth cen tu ries. T his move lim ite d th e political m an euverability o f
larger blocs and also supplied an easily m o b ilized national network th at proved
particularly u se fu l in quellin g indigenous op p osition to other new in stitu tio n s,
such as concertaje (labor conscription or debt peonage), an institution th at would
literally work to break dow n regional d ivid es.22
Concertaje not o n ly bolstered the h acien d a system by replacing trib u te but
also fueled national p u blic works projects d esign ed to create a serviceable in
frastructure. The sy ste m ’s indigenous c o n sc rip ts, who often w orked w ith ou t
the benefit o f even h a n d tools, built hundreds o f m iles o f roads in the southern
A ndes that helped integrate the Andean a n d c o astal regions.25 T h eir la b o r also
b u ilt railroad lines in th e coastal lowlands, w h ich soon linked G u a y a q u il w ith
a navigable river system where paddlewheels b e g a n hauling cacao d estin ed for
the world m arket, u sh erin g in a boom th at w o u ld last until the 1920s. P lan s to
expand the railw ay to the A ndean slopes, how ever, rem ained incom plete due to
the harsh m ountainous terrain and m udslide-prone jungles.24
The Politics and Poetics o f Regionalism / 13
Fig. 1.5. A lam eda Park, Q uito (c. 19 0 0 ). C ou rtesy A rchivo H istó rico , Ban co C entral del E cuad or.
the m assive repression o f the d icta to r’s earlier rule. P rovin cial ru le continued to
define national politics and also b egan to play a more im p o rtan t role in tightly
controlling fu n d s for local developm ent projects, in effect restrictin g the relative
autonom y m unicipal authorities h ad enjoyed during the p revio u s generation.
The m ajor cities o f Quito, C u e n ca , and G uayaquil were p artic u la rly affected;
th eir budgets were overseen n ot o n ly by the provincial auth orities but also by
the n ation al congress. A s in the G arcian age, the national trea su ry bankrolled
projects em ploying new tech n olo gies, o f which the m ost im p o rtan t were the
strin gin g o f a telegraph line betw een Q uito and G u ayaquil, the elaboration o f a
relatively efficient postal service, and the provision o f electrical lighting to the
inajor cities.
Im provem ents and exp an sio n in the coastal cacao econom y accom panied
and p artly subsidized these in n ovation s in the national in frastru ctu re. While
the G a rcia n steam ship netw orks had increased local p rod u ction capacity, the
in trod uction o f a new bean th at flourished in the h ith erto u n d erutilized A n
dean footh ills generated soarin g h arvests that catapulted E cu ado r into the posi
tion o f leading global cacao producer from the 1890s to the 19 20s.32 The growing
p ro sp erity did not trickle d ow n to the general population, w ith m ore than 70
percent o f revenue going into th e h an ds o f ten fam ilies. N evertheless, chronic
labor shortages on the coast fu eled a desire to loosen the traditional landed ties
o f ru ra l workers in the sierra. A new regional crisis began to develop in the mid-
1890s due to the reluctance o f sierra landowners to eradicate concertaje. Guaya
q u il again becam e the center o f vigorous opposition, given th at the m ajority o f
the cacao barons resided there an d were linked through trade and fiscal ties to
the new ban k in g sector, w hose credit also helped fu el speculation and further
grow th o f the export sector. T h ese tensions lay at the h eart o f th e cacao indus
tr y ’s em brace o f Eloy A lfa ro ’s revolution in 1895, d espite in itia l reservations
abou t the radical populism o f h is agenda.33
R egional and political tensions also colored the literary flow ering of costum
brismo, a South A m erican ro m an ticism centered on the p o rtrayal o f local color.
C o n servatives such as Ju a n L eón M era provided id ealized im ages o f serrano
gen tility in works like Cumandd, a novel featuring a love sto ry between the scion
o f a land ow ning fam ily and a v irg in a l A m azonian In d ian .34 Fray Solano (José
M od esto Espinosa) expanded the genre with his lam p ooning feuilletons depict
ing Q uito’s provincial quietude and the ironic hum or o f its inhabitants, for the
first tim e identified as sal quiteña.” Costumbrismo also em erged as an important
in flu en ce on the plastic a rts o f the late nineteenth cen tu ry. T h e two prim ary
a rtis ts to em brace this m ovem en t, quiteños Joaquín P in to an d José A gustín
G u errero , highlighted their politics in their watercolors d ep ictin g daily life in
the capital. The conservative P in to celebrated images o f street vendors, festivals,
an d indigenous dancers w hile the liberal Guerrero foregrounded the m isery o f
indigenous conditions in a m an n er rem iniscent o f M anuel Fuentes’s depictions
o f p o ve rty in Lim a.36
i6 \ T he Politics and Poetics o f R egion alism
tion since it w ould give th em the op p ortu nity to increase their pool o f labor. The
subaltern arm y A lfa r o com m anded caused even m ore havoc in C u en ca, where
the socially con servative elite actively resisted th e uprising. In 'a b a n d o n in g its
traditional alliance w ith Guayaquil and m o v in g m ore conclusively into Q u ito’s
orbit, Cuenca effectively ended the trip artite region al scheme th at h a d d o m i
nated the politics o f the nineteenth cen tu ry.4* D espite this deepening p o la riz a
tion, the liberal a rm y rap id ly defeated the d iscred ited Progressive governm ent
and entered the cap ital in December 1895 w ith a m an date for change.42
There were tw o m a in com ponents to th e lib e ra l m odernization p rog ram
that shifted the re g io n a l power structure. T h e first sought to c u rb th e pow er
o f the Catholic C h u rch , whose alliance w ith A n d e a n landowners h ad bolstered
their political d o m in a n ce through m ost o f th e nineteenth cen tury. A lth o u g h
continued pockets o f conservative resistance h am p ered A lfa ro ’s ab ility to in tro
duce secularizing re fo rm s in his first te rm , th e vo lu n tary exile o f th e m ajo rity
o f the episcopacy lim ited the C hurch’s a b ility to m ount a serious ch allen ge to
the governm ent. B y 19 0 0 , the Vatican h a d d ecid ed on a pragm atic course and
thus endorsed B ishop Federico González S u á re z ’s condem nation o f a p lan n ed
invasion o f co n servative forces m assing in C o lom b ia. Open strife d im in ish e d ,
but jockeying over control o f social fu n ctio n s continued under A lfa ro ’s actively
anticlerical successor, Leonidas Plaza. T h e y e a r 19 0 0 saw the in stitu tio n o f a
civil registry, follow ed b y civil m arriage tw o years later and the d eclaration o f
freedom o f w orship in 1904. The state c o n fiscated clerical lands th at sam e year,
though for the n ext fo u r years it allowed th e C h u rch to keep rental incom e. In
1906, the V atican countered the land con fiscatio n s by nam ing G o n zález Suárez
to the archbishopric o f Quito. His m oderate p olitics and national rep u tation a l
lowed him to advance policies designed to lim it the .state’s an ticlericalism , such
as rebuilding an episcopacy decim ated b y e x ile an d death during th e p reviou s
ten years.45
Creating a n atio n al economic in fra stru c tu re form ed the second p illa r o f the
Liberal program . O ne o f the key aspects o f th is endeavor involved th e m igra
tion o f the un tapp ed labor pool o f the A n d e s to the cacao plantations. Concertaje
rem ained the m ajo r obstacle to planters’ lo n g tim e desire to access th a t labor,
and it was therefore repeatedly attacked in th e Liberal press. A b ill c a llin g for
its eradication w as introduced in C o n gress in 1899; however, the lan d h o ld in g
classes m an aged to block its passage u n til 19 18. Thereafter, m ig ra tio n to the
coast boom ed. B y 1950, 4 1 percent o f th e n a tio n a l population resided in th e lit
toral as opposed to ju st 15 percent in 1840 a n d 30 percent in 1909.44
The m ost im p o rta n t initiative, how ever, w as the building o f a railw ay lin k
age between the capital and the m ain p ort. A s A lfa ro ’s signature w ork, th e costly
and controversial ra il venture tran sfo rm ed th e co u n try’s spatial d y n a m ic. In
terregional cargo shipm ents increased d ra m a tic a lly after the ra ilw a y ’s com ple
tion in 1908 as a n integrated national m a rk e t developed for the first tim e, w ith
agricultural staples traveling down the m o u n ta in s and im ported com m od ities
18 \ The Politics and Poetics o f Regionalism
flowing into th e h igh lan d s. Internal tra n sp o rta tio n o f a g ric u ltu ra l products
increased fro m a n an n u al average o f 2 7,511 tons in 1910 to 158,272 in 1942. Ship
ments o f lu m b er a n d m anufactured g o o d s also increased d ra m a tic a lly while
those o f livesto ck an d m inerals d ou b led .45 T h ese figures represented a m arked
change fro m th e nineteenth century, w h en the central h ighland d is tr ic t’s m ain
customer w as C olom bia and the litto ral’s need for grains and o th er staples was
fed largely b y b o th Colom bia and P eru .46
The co n stru ctio n o f the railroad tra n sfo rm e d Ecuadorian regio n alism more
profoundly th a n an y other effort since th e d ays o f García M oreno. Perhaps its
most salient im p a c t was to exclude C u e n ca from benefiting fro m th e increased
com m erce b y a vo id in g the city’s orbit altogether. The route p la n n in g for the
railway effectively m arginalized the c ity an d accelerated an in crea sin g ly bipo
lar constitution o f the national econom y.47 Liberals rhetorically p roclaim ed the
railway to be a “redem ptive work,” as K im C la rk has put it, arg u in g th at decades
o f stagnation w o u ld be wiped away w ith a chug and a whistle. T h is argum ent
u sually featu red regionalist m etaphors th a t equated the A n d es w ith in su lar
ity, clerical le th a rg y , and stagnation w h ile the coast was presented as vibrant,
mobile, and progressive. The railroad, b y op en in g isolated pockets o f the Andes
to the w ider w o rld , w ould thus redeem th e nation and force it to em brace the
progress o f the tw entieth century.4®
A s the lo n gtim e stronghold o f the C o n servative Party, the c ity o f Q uito, with
its m yriad ch urch es, legions o f indigenous laborers, and p rovin cial reputation,
was also a rip e target for the liberal estab lish m en t. Critics su ch ’ a s Cuencan-
born jo u rn a list M an u el J. Calle and Ju a n M ontalvo’s erstw hile asso ciate, R o
berto A n d ra d e, penned a flu rry o f essays and novels that ech oed Jose A gu stin
Guerrero’s rib a ld castigation o f the c ity ’s in su larity. A lfaro h im s e lf m ade the
transform ation o f Q uito a personal g o a l, freein g governm ent fu n d s fo r public
works projects. T h ese included a new m arketp lace m odeled o n L es H ailes in
Paris and a n atio n al exposition. C o n stru ctio n was paralleled b y in creased offer
ings in secu lar education, beginning w ith the 1897 establishm ent o f the Instituto
Nacional M ejia, a secondary school th at b y the 1920s had com e to riv a l the Jesuit
Colegio de S a n G abriel as the forem ost education al institution in the country.
Am ong its grad u ates were major figures o f the literary renaissance o f the 1920s
and 1930s such as G onzalo Escudero, Jorge Carrera A ndrade, H u m b erto Salva
dor, and Jorge Ic a z a .49 Another key in stitu tio n was the Escuela d e B ellas A rtes,
founded in 19 0 4 , which provided the tra in in g for m any o f th e a rtists, such as
Cam ilo Egas, w ho cam e to redefine indigenista painting, as well as traditionalists
like the p o rtraitist Victor Mideros.
The first p h ase o f the Liberal R evolution devolved into a pow er struggle be
tween L eon id as Plaza and Eloy A lfaro . It cam e to an end in 19 12 , w ith A lfa ro ’s
death and m a rty rd o m . Although the V iejo Luchador rem ained p o p u la r as late
as 1910 due to h is bold march to the so u th ern border to defend a g a in st a possible
Peruvian in vasio n , h is attempt to in stall h im se lf as dictator the n e x t year met
The Politics and Poetics o f Regionalism / 19
struck first, however, as Jacinto Jijó n led a failed coup attem p t w ith support
from the C entro Ecuatoriano del O brero Católico (C E D O C ). Jijón then went
into exile in Colom bia, and a grou p o f le ftist intellectuals led b y the econom ist
Luis N. D illon agitated against th e c o rru p t adm inistration and its close ties with
G u a y a q u i l ’s Banco Com ercial y A g ric o la , the state’s largest creditor. M agazines
from across the political sp e c tru m , su ch as the m ilitary review El abanderado
and the socialist La antorcha, join ed in criticizing the governm ent. In Ju ly 1925, a
group o f d isaffected arm y lieu tenants allied w ith D illon’s le ftist supporters and
overthrew the governm ent.“
The Ju lia n Revolution in sta lle d E c u a d o r’s first go vern m en t w ith socialist
tendencies. However, once in pow er, th e tenientes abandoned th eir calls for social
reform and instead resorted to regio n alist politics, placing the b lam e for the cur
rent crisis squarely on the shoulders o f the Guayaquil b an k in g aristocracy. T his
rhetorical castigation deepened u n d e r the governm ent o f th e lib e ra ls’ hand-
picked president, Dr. Isidro A yo ra, a fo rm er m ayor o f Q uito. A yora’s p rio ritiz
ing o f fiscal reform led him to in vite th e “m oney doctor,” A m e ric an econom ist
Edwin Kem m erer, to visit in 1926. K em m erer advocated estab lish in g a central
bank, lead in g Q uito and G u a y a q u il’s elites to wrangle over th e location o f this
institution the following year. A lth o u g h the economist favored establishing the
ban k ’s h eadquarters in the capital, a larger subsidiary was sim u ltan eou sly built
in the p o rt city to calm local je a lo u sie s.62 Ayora’s go vern m en t also adopted a
progressive new constitution in 1928 th at was the first in L a tin A m e rica to grant
women the right to vote. These re fo rm s, however, could not overcom e the Great
Depression. A m id more social u n rest, A yora fell in 1931.
Despite ongoing attem pts to p ap er over national social tensions b y evoking
regionalist pretensions, the 1930s saw increasing m ilitan cy fro m bo th the L e ft
and the R ig h t as well as concom itant clashes w ith the state. T h e m ost critical
conflagration involved the m ilita ry an d the Falangist-inspired C om pactación
Obrera N acion al (CON) in A u g u s t 1932 over the p resid en tial succession to
Ayora. T h e C O N supported the ca n d id a c y o f N eptali B o n ifa z , a conservative
and form er president o f the B anco C en tral who, though legally elected, turned
out to be ineligible for the p residency because he had been b o rn in Peru. A fte r
weeks o f dem onstrations b y b o th sides, several m ilita ry sq u ad ro n s fro m the
greater Q uito area engaged C O N brigad es, igniting the ca p ita l’s bloodiest battle
since independence, a four-day sk irm ish known as the G u e rra de los Cuatro
Días. Elections held the follow ing ye ar confirm ed the gro w in g im po rtan ce o f
labor w hen pop ulist candidate José M a ría Velasco Ibarra, a h ig h ly skilled ora
tor, w on h is first term . He w o uld b e elected to the p residen cy five tim es over
the next three decades, though he m an aged to serve a fu ll term on ly twice. L a
bor w as n o t the only sector o f so cie ty becom ing m ore m ilita n t, however. The
younger intelligentsia increasingly joined the ranks o f the S o cia list P arty in the
afterm ath o f the Julian Revolution. M a n y o f these progressive intellectuals en-
22 \ T h e Politics and Poetics o f Regionalism
In ad dition to this m o u n tin g chaos, the 1920s also saw the explosion o f p op
u la rly consum ed nostalgic co lu m n s, stories, theater, a n d a rt em ulating the cos
tumbrista portraits o f the n in eteen th century. These ch ron icles o f “ traditional”
w ays w ere particularly p o p u la r in Q uito and G u a y a q u il, the cities undergoing
the greatest change during th ese years. One school e m u lated the tradición, a cos
tumbrista variation developed b y P eru vian historian a n d critic Ricardo Palm a in
the 18 70 s that consists o f a vig n e tte depicting a c o lo rfu l asp ect o f the national
p ast, o ften tinged with irony an d satire.64 The genealogist C ristó bal Gangotena y
Jijón cra fte d scores o f Q uito ch ron icles whose picaresque fria rs and w ily gentle
m en recalled the sal quiteña elab orated b y José M od esto E spinosa a generation
earlier. G u a ya q u il’s great cronistas (chroniclers), M o d e sto C havez Franco and
G a b riel Pino Roca, on the o th e r h an d , substituted h eroic soldiers saving the
p o rt fro m pirates by day a n d sed u cin g young girls b y n igh t. A n o th er school
em b raced the rogues o f society, highlighted b y the p o r t ’s José A ntonio C a m
p os, w ho published under th e confrontation al p seu d o n ym o f Jack the Ripper. A
som ew hat stifFer embrace o f c o lo rfu l deviants appeared in th e guided city tours
o f Q u ito ’s A lejandro A n d ra d e C o ello , art critic an d literatu re professor at the
In stitu to Nacional Mejia, w ho jo in ed the cronista fra y in th e m id -i930s.65
It is am ong these rhetorical constructions o f the old c ity that the postcards
w ith w hich we began this ch ap ter tru ly belong. A s su ch, th e y form part o f an on
go in g tradition attem pting to develop a sense o f region al distinctiveness datin g
to th e colonial period but th a t h a d com e to the forefro n t in the late nineteenth
cen tury. W hile these tensions h a d themselves sparked extensive strife, economic
riv a lry , and political d ysfu n ction , the growing class d iv isio n o f a sh ifting society
m ad e affirm in g regional sp e c ific ity a nostalgic, w h im sic a l, and apolitical en
terp rise. In the case o f G u a y a q u il, th is desire was a lo n g in g for the world’s larg
est cacao port, a place peopled b y elegant bankers, a p lace o f rom antic m oonlit
stro lls and prosperity. In the ca se o f Quito, it was a desire fo r the certainty o f the
c ity o f vecinos safely rem oved fro m the indigenous rabble th at labored for them ,
fo r a city o f priests whose exh o rtatio n s to their flock con sisted o f gently m ocking
th e lo ca l boor who discovered th e im age o f the V irgin M a ry in the lard rem ains
on h is em panada, as described in one o f Gangotena’s fab les. In short, this desire
w as a nostalgic constitution o f regionalism that h a d little resem blance to the
h isto ric a l record but that h ad g ain ed credence am id th e ch ao s o f the present.
T h is book is not about a series o f postcards but in stea d about the evolution
o f th is specific form o f n o sta lgic regionalism . W hile th e M in istry o f Tou rism
T h e Politics and Poetics o f Regionalism / 23
Chapter 2
24
M apping the Center o f the World / 25
their incorporation o f sy m b o ls, the eliding or inclu sion o f populations, and the
creation o f focal points b y the highlighting o f sp ecific aspects o f the p h ysical
landscape.1 Denis W ood a n d John Fels, am ong oth ers, have extended H arley ’s
analysis by highlighting th e subjectivity o f the carto grap h ic projection itse lf,
m ost recently arguing th a t m ap s m ay best be u n d ersto od as a series o f “p ro p o si
tions” rather than as m irro rs o f reality.2 Sim ilarly, Jo h n Pickles has elucidated a
variety o f approaches to u n d erstan d in g what he term s the “cartographic ga z e,”
that is to say, the set o f p ractices and techniques th at together brand m aps w ith
the authenticity o f scien ce and the veneer o f o b je ctiv ity .3 These recon sid era
tions o f mapping p ractices h ave given rise to an ever-grow ing num ber o f s tu d
ies docum enting how m a p s have served the go als o f colonial states an d c o m
m ercial interests th rou gh th e territorialization o f space, that is, the process o f
naturalizing the claim s o f states and businesses to control space without regard
for the contours o f th e la n d sc a p e or the interests o f its inhabitants. C r a ftin g
this “ G o d ’s-eye view,” h ow ever, can no longer be considered a process b ereft o f
contestation from the su bjects o f the cartographic gaze. A s Raym ond C raib h a s
argued with regard to nineteen th-century M exico, state attem pts to locate a n d
cartographically d elin ea te “ fu gitive land scap es” b o th articu lated h egem on ic
power relations and d em o n strated the lim its o f state dom ination over o u tly in g
populations that engaged in a selective dialogue w ith national cartographers in
order to defend and artic u la te local interests subject to elision through m ap p in g
processes.4
The constitution o f u rb an m aps bears a general resem blance to the n ation al,
im perial, or colonial p rocesses o f territorialization described above. H ow ever,
given the particular im p o rta n ce o f the city as a m ark e r o f citizenship in S p a n ish
A m erica, urban -yiews sh o u ld also be considered an expression o f w hat R ic h
ard Kagan has term ed th e “com m unicentric” id eal. A s such, urban m ap s n ot
on ly act as a tool fo r u se in im plem enting cru d e exploitation and control o ver
territory but also express a m ore subtle articu latio n o f collective identity (what
Kagan terms civitas or civic-com m un al identity) th a t can at tim es be d ivorced
from cartographic a ccu ra c y (urbs or constructed space).5
The m aps o f Q u ito d iscu ssed below d en om in ate p articu lar elite c o n stitu
tions o f the city’s ch aracter. A review o f th eir com m u n icen tric im agery h elps
illustrate the com plexity o f the hegemonic project involved in the representation
and production o f Q uito space. Despite a general consensus as to the legitim acy
o f cartography as a d ire c t topographic reflection , Q uito m aps also sh ow case
sh ifting and conflicting considerations o f social legitim acy and visions o f co m
m unity. O f p articu lar im p o rtan ce is the alteration o f the dom inant city view ,
from one characterized b y in su lar religiosity to th a t o f a tourist d estination at
the center o f the w o rld , w ith a m onum ental colo n ial core, sophisticated n o rth
ern districts, and b o u n tifu l environs.
This process in tersected w ith two colonial discourses that evoked the c it y ’s
universality. The first o f these stem m ed from a m illen aria n vision id e n tify in g
26 \ Mapping the Center o f the World
th e city as a new R o m e th at w ould lead the contin en tal crusade to convert in d ig
enous peoples to th e C atholic faith. The second touted Q uito’s secular role as the
site o f the eighteenth-century Fran co-Spanish G eodesic M ission th at set ou t to
m easure the arc o f th e equatorial m eridian. E ach o f these allegorical a n d in h er
en tly cosm opolitan v ista s cam e to be e n sh rin e d cartograp h ically w h ile b ein g
refram ed for the m o d ern consum er. Elided in these representations were th e in
digenous population s, h aciend as, and sm all tow ns o f the rural periph ery, w hich
was now reconsidered as a periurban space open for chalets o f the elite, factories,
or tourist-friendly d a y trip s. Q uito cartographers thus helped consolidate state
a n d com m ercial in terests in the developm ent o f the city’s environs w h ile also
c ra ftin g a m oral ju stific a tio n for its im perial expan sio n through ch orograp h ic
im ages. A s such, th ey served as brokers betw een the state and the bu sin ess com
m unity, a role cem ented in the 1930s w ith the cen tralizing o f cartograph ic p rac
tices w ithin the S ervic io Geográfico M ilitar. T h is specialized corps o f engineers,
cartographers, an d geographers reified an d m ass-produced the to p o grap h ical
m ythologies o f Q uito-sp ace developed over the previous h a lf century.
There was th u s a process o f in stitu tio n a liz a tio n , co m m o d ificatio n , an d
codification o f the c ity ’s cartographic lexicon fro m the colonial p eriod th rou gh
the 1940s. In this gen ealo gy o f Q uito’s cartograp h ic production, the intersection
betw een colonial d iscou rses, technological inn ovation , state-driven c o m m em o
ration, and m ilita ry professionalism is o f cen tral concern. The m aps p rod u ced
in the nam e o f these vectors celebrated the c ity ’s equatorial position an d p resti
gious contributions to w orld science, p articu la rly a fter a second French geodesic
m ission, the s ta ff o f w h ich visited Ecuador b etw een 1901 and 1906. T h ese tropes
com bined under th e chronotope m arkin g th e c ity as the mitad del mundo, th e
center o f the world.
for exam ple, maps p rod uced for this survey often incorporated native glyp h s
or featured distended geo g rap h y incom m ensurate w ith European p ractices.6
T h e subsequent im po sition o f planar geography an d the “C o d ’s-eye view ” o f
orthogonal projections h ave been interpreted in recent scholarship as a d irect
assault on native cosm ographies by a nascent im p e ria l pow er.7 Sim ply p u t, the
deploying o f cartography’s potent scientific gaze served as a m eans o f ju stifica
tion for the self-appointed civilizin g mission o f the Iberian power.
W hile world m aps p ro vid ed an extensive argu m en t for European centrality,
an am biguity pervaded the u rb an views, which alternately reified and subverted
th is im plicit geopolitical hierarchy. On the one h a n d , the developm ent o f the
orthogonal city plan and th e im position o f a m onotonous grid upon preexisting
cities bolstered claim s o f W estern scientific superiority. A s often as not, h ow
ever, the city view incorporated iconography d em onstrating its com m unal ch ar
acter, thus opening the p ossib ility o f a distinctly creole sensibility interrogating
the preeminence o f the E u ro p ean core.
T h is situation p artly developed from the p arad oxical constitution o f u rb an
collective identities as em blem atic o f micro- and m acrop atrio tism im plied in
vecindad. Local identities b egan to coalesce over the course o f the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries, a n d , w hile not excluding sim u ltan eo u s p articipation
w ith in the Spanish E m p ire, th ey began to ch allen ge exclusive identification
w ith one’s peninsular o rig in s. T h is sense o f uniqueness intensified du ring the
seventeenth century, p a rtic u la rly with the increasing presence o f p en in su lar
im m igrants and the subsequent rise o f what D avid B rading has called creole p a
triotism .® The articulation o f this distinctly A m erican consciousness developed
slowly and depended on the elaboration o f ritu als an d im ages that p erform ed
an d bolstered a sense o f com m u n al distinctiveness.
M aps and urban view s constituted some o f the m ost visible m eans o f il
lustrating a city’s civic valu es in both Spain and in S p an ish A m erica, yet, by
the seventeenth century, im perial policy had forbidden their elaboration due to
security issues after raid s on Spanish A m erican cities b y pirates and com peting
European powers. The constitu tion o f allegorical im ages standing in for cho-
rographic representations o f urban landscapes grew in the wake o f the ban on
city maps in 1632. The seventeenth century thus saw the expansion o f sym bolic
visu a l culture often fo cu sed on M arian cults and O ld W orld allusions designed
to identify local civitas. M exico City, for instance, not on ly becam e identified
w ith the Virgin o f G u a d a lu p e but was also construed as a new Jerusalem . L im a,
proclaim ed “ la ciudad de los Reyes” by Pizarro u p on its foun d in g, was sim ilarly
conceived as a Western p arad ise, a new Eden, b y its secu lar and clerical p op u la
tion alike.’
Like its fellow A m e ric a n capitals, Quito also ad op ted an Old World refer
ent to highlight its central role in the form ation o f a m illen arian world, in this
case the holy center o f R o m e. The label appears to h ave originated follow ing
the discovery o f the A m a z o n b y Francisco de O rellan a in 1541 on an expedition
28 \ M apping the Center o f the World
that d eparted from Quito and provided justification for considering the city as
the startin g point for a new crusade. T h e subsequent con stitu tion o f Quito as a
pilgrim age site bolstered this contention and led to the developm ent o f no fewer
than three m ajor M arian cults b y the end o f the seventeenth cen tu ry, o f which
the nearby V irgin o f Guápulo and the V irg in o f El Quinche are the best known.
Moreover, the city garnered a reputation for m iracles, in clu d in g the celebrated
seventeenth-century “ divine” intervention to save the city fro m p lagu e at the
request o f a young m artyr, M arian a de Jesu s.1“
A s C arm en Fernández-Salvador h as argued, these cu lts in sp ired attempts
by the c it y ’s Jesuit and Fran ciscan com m u n ities to brand th e c ity as a new
Rome, fro m which continental conversion w ould em anate.” Fo r instance, one
seventeenth-century Jesuit, Pedro de M ercado, devoted his acco u n t o f the city
alm ost exclusively to the “m iracles” p erform ed by its in h a b ita n ts, im plying a
contrast betw een their “saintly” lives and the vice-ridden lives o f the rest o f the
province’s inhabitants.12 Quito’s Fran ciscan m onastery provides an im age-laden
example o f the process o f relocating R om e to the slopes o f Pich inch a.
Fernández-Salvador notes the presence o f two sets o f d ep iction s o f Rom an
pilgrim age sites that follow the seq u ential order recom m ended in seventeenth-
century Italian guidebooks. She posits the existence o f a v irtu a l to u r o f the his
toric capital o f Christendom organized b y the liturgical calend ar, an d she bases
this theory on the series o f m urals fo u n d in the church choir and in the adjoining
Cantuña chapel, named for a w ell-to-do seventeenth-century indigen ous black
sm ith who was active in the local cu lt o f the H oly Cross (V eracruz) and who,
legend holds, m ade a pact with the d evil b y offering him the lost treasure o f the
Inca A tah u alp a to complete the chapel in a day.13 This circuit b e g in s w ith Saint
John the B ap tist, representative o f the Lateran Basilica w ith in th e city walls o f
Rome. R ath er than proceed according to the city’s geography, the next stops
are the basilicas o f Saints Peter and Paul, outside the historic w a lls bu t next up
on the litu rgical calendar. The n ext three paintings continue th is trajectory by
depicting O ur Lady o f La A ntigu a (referencing the basilica o f S an ta M aria Mag-
giore) an d then Saints Lawrence and Sebastian. Finally, in th e m ost elaborate
work in b o th the chapel and the m ain choir stands Saint H elen, an im age that
likely references the Church o f the H oly Cross in Jerusalem b ecau se its relics
were brough t to Rome by Em peror C o n stan tin e’s m other, H elen. Fernández-
Salvador reads the emphasis on the H oly Cross within C a n tu ñ a ’s chapel as an
expression o f the devotion o f the indigenous cofradía, or lay brotherhood, that
met w ith in its walls. Like Rome in the previous m illennium , th e A n d ea n citadel
would inherit the task o f spreading C h ristian doctrine to a new continent.14
D u rin g the eighteenth century, th e conceit o f Q uito’s m essia n ic character
was reborn due to its role in the developm ent o f the secular religion o f geograph
ical science. A s the need for cartograph ic secrecy receded, an adherence to En
lightenm ent principles helped p ersu ad e Philip V o f Spain to p articipate in the
Franco-Spanish Geodesic M ission to m easure the arc o f the equ ato rial meridian
M apping the Center o f the W orld / 29
Fig. 2.1. C harles M aried e La Conclam ine, d e ta il o f Plan de Quito (1751). C o u rtesy L ib ra ry o f Congress.
which identifies the city as Q uito a n d provides its coordinates in reference to the
Parisian m erid ian . The cartouche a lso includes a detailed im age o f tw o couples,
one E u ro p ean and one indigenous, w h o stan d on either sid e o f an enorm ous
globe, w h ich the white male is sh ow in g to h is partner. S u rro u n d in g the figures
are exotic equatorial flora, in clu d in g ca cti, pineapples, and p a lm frond s (atop
the cartouche). Taken together, the im ages present a vision o f a c u ltu re about to
emerge fro m its prim itive existence, in d eed , to become literally th e center o f the
globe, th rough the potency o f Eu ro p ean science. The m ap’s to p o n y m y furthers
the exotification o f Quito, subtly erasin g the previous two cen tu ries o f colonial
rule.'6 T h u s, the Panecillo, a sm all h ill on the city’s southern edge, is identified
by its p re-C olum bian title o f Y avirac w h ile the A lam ed a p astu res in the north
ern environs o f the city are id entified as the site o f the battle betw een Gonzalo
Pizarro a n d Viceroy Blasco N unez V ela in 1546.
If L a C o n d am in e presents a noble b ut p rim itive Quito, Ju a n an d U lloa’s map
(fig. 2.2) em phasizes the strength o f th e Spanish monarchy an d fu rth e rs the case
for their perso n al prominence w ith in the scientific expedition. A s in the earlier
work, b y L a Condam ine, the arc o f th e m erid ian in the Spanish m ap travels from
lower le ft to upper right, ending in a cartouche id en tifyin g th e p la n o f Quito,
complete w ith its location vis-à-vis th e Paris m eridian. The Ib eria n s break with
La C o n d am in e b y foregrounding the c ity ’s built environm ent, w h ich interrupts
the m erid ian ’s progress until it em erges in the “vacant” cou n trysid e on the upper
31
32 \ M apping the Center o f the World
righ t. Here it encounters an oth er cartouche, one th at deem phasizes the pastoral
land scape present in the Fren ch m an ’s iconography, in stead presenting a sim ple
scroll decorated only w ith th e royal lion echoed b y th e n earb y presence o f the
A la m e d a , identified as “potrero del Rey." Sim ilarly, th e w o rk ’s toponym y lim its
references to nature, with the exception o f the P an ecillo— once again identified
b y its Iberian nam e— and in stead foregrounds the c ity ’s religious association b y
h igh ligh tin g Catholic la n d m a rk s. In a list o f fifty-tw o p u b lic buildings, a ll bu t
ten are sacred structures, in clu d in g churches, chapels, p arish seats, and nunner
ies. T h e few secular bu ild in gs collectively em phasize m u n icip a l authority, but
am o n g them are two h ouses w here the scientists con d u cted m easurem ents o f
the Q uito m eridian. A s su ch , the m ap ultim ately m erges traditional sym bols o f
religiosity and power w ith a new sense o f the city’s scientific_prominence.
T h e Franco-Spanish exp ed itio n ultim ately had little im pact on the produc
tion o f local cartography, p a rtly as a result o f Pedro V icente M aldonado’s dem ise
sh ortly after his arrival in Europe. However, it placed th e city and Audiencia o f
Q uito at the center o f an in tern ation al coterie o f ex p e rts and intellectuals in a
w ay that has rarely, if ever, b een duplicated. La C o n d a m in e ’s colorful d escrip
tion o f h is exploits brought no to riety even as he d ism isse d the land as fu n d a
m en tally backward. W hile th e nationalist Jesuit Ju a n d e Velasco expressed h is
d issatisfactio n with La C o n d a m in e ’s condem nation o f Q u ito ’s barbaric in d ig
enous inhabitants, the region ’s international p rom in en ce grew as a result. Its
equ atorial associations exp an d ed following the celebrated travels o f natu ralist
A lex a n d e r von H um boldt, w hose Personal Narrative o f Travels of the Equinoctial
Regions o f the New Continent during Years 1799-1804, p u b lish ed in French, G e r
m a n , E nglish , and Span ish over the first decades o f th e nineteenth century,
firm ly cemented Quito’s glo b al reputation as a fascin a tin g tropical landscape.17
W hen the province joined B o liv ar’s G ran Colom bia in 18 24 , enterprising lead
ers hoping for quick in tern ation al recognition ren am ed th e Quito departm ent
E cu a d o r a fter its geographic location, a decision th a t m ay also have reflected
G u a y a q u il’s developing au to n om ist spirit. The ap p ellatio n stuck following the
separation o f the Quito, G u a y a q u il, and Cuenca d ep artm en ts from the C olom
b ian republic in 1830 and h as rem ained the name o f the nation ever since.18
T h e cult o f the G eodesic m ission continued to d evelo p in the afterm ath o f
independence. Indeed, the nascent Rocafuerte go vern m en t celebrated the 1836
cen tennial o f La C ondam ine’s arrival b y rebuilding th e v e ry pyram id at O yam -
baro th at had caused such consternation a century earlier, th is tim e without the
o ffen d in g fleur-de-lis at its apex. W hile budgetary co n strain ts continued to re
tard the development o f n ation al cartographic p rod u ction , this effort bespeaks
th e im portance the event h a d acquired in the local a n d national im agination
o f a co u n try seeking to d efin e its character. U ltim ately, however, it w ould be
th e un iversalizin g doctrine o f a city o f God that d ro ve th e expansion o f local
cartograph ic production d u rin g the García Moreno ad m in istration.
Mapping the Center o f the World / 33
G a rcía M oreno came to pow er in 1858 in the wake o f a flare-u p o f the peren
nial b o rd er conflict between E c u a d o r and Peru. The b o u n d a ry d ispu te origi
nated in th e transfer o f the A u d ie n cia o f Quito in 1739 to th e ju risd ictio n o f the
newly created Viceroyalty o f N ew G ran ad a. The subsequent sh u fflin g o f Quito
(and esp ecially the prosperous p o rt o f G uayaquil, with its su b stan tial custom s
duties) in betw een the two vice ro y a ltie s led to repeated co n flic ts and co n fu
sion over righ tfu l territorial sovereignty. In 1828, the new republics o f Peru and
G ran C olom bia (of which E cu ad o r w as still a part) clashed in a viciou s war that
ended w ith Colom bian victo ry at th e Battle o f Tarqui in 1829. T h ree separate
agreem ents were negotiated betw een 1829 and 1832, yet, in the 1850s, the dispute
emerged again when Ecuador w as try in g to transfer ow nership o f disputed ter
ritory to settle its debts to B ritish an d U .S . interests. The resu ltin g 1858 skirm ish
contributed to the national d estab ilization that gave rise to G a rcía M oreno’s ad
m inistration in 1861.
T h e new president quickly set ou t to expand the national educational system
in allian ce w ith clerical in stru cto rs, actions that built on h is fo rm er career as
rector o f the U niversity o f Q u ito. T h e m ajority o f h is energies w ent into the
form ation o f ru ral schools designed to help incorporate isolated regions into the
national b o d y politic. T echnical edu cation, though, w as a seco n d ary interest.
G arcía M oreno sponsored the fo rm a tio n o f the E scuela de A rte s y Oficios in
Q uito for artisan al training, alo n g w ith a tuition-free p olytech n ic designed to
accelerate the growth o f scientific a c tiv ity in the nation. A s w ith m an y o f his
other endeavors, this venture w as m an aged by Jesuit re c ru its im ported from
Europe, the first o f whom reached Q uito in A ugust 1870. T h e a rriv a l o f the Je
suits coincided with the resu m ption o f negotiations betw een E cu ad o r and Peru,
which m ade the study o f cartograp h ic drafting and geodesic su rveyin g a grow
ing im perative. Although the u n iversity was forced to close its doors tem porarily
after G arcía M oreno’s assassination in 1875, it had a direct im pact on the growth
of fu tu re cartographic stu d ies.19
Perhaps the m ost im portant contributor was the Jesu it m ath em atician Juan
M enten, best known for his later role as director o f Q uito’s observatory, whose
bu ild in g in the heart o f the A la m e d a he also designed. A t the polytech nic, M en
ten w as responsible for courses in geodesy, m athem atics, a n d d raftin g . By 1875,
the p riest and his students h ad com pleted enough local m easu rem en ts to com
pile the first m ap o f Q uito since th e colonial era to em ploy u p d ated m easure
m ents. M enten’s projection not on ly sought to docum ent the slight grow th that
the city h ad undergone over the p reviou s century but also challenged the tradi
tional h orizon tal orientation o f Q u ito m aps, using a ve rtic a l orientation with
34 \ M apping the Center o f the W orld
no rth at the top o f the view . T h is norm alizing o f E u ro p ean m apping conven
tions continued in the subsequent efforts o f M enten’s colleague, Teodoro Wolf.
A geologist o f G erm an o rig in , W o lf’s career at the p o lytech n ic ended prem a
turely due to a scandal in 1874 over his teaching o f D a rw in ia n evolution. Despite
the nationalist overtures o f th is pedagogy given the im po rtan ce o f D arwin’s visit
to the Ecuadorian G alapagos Isla n d s to his theories, W o lf w as branded a pro
ponent o f a heretical theory a n d ultim ately defrocked. G a rcia M oreno, loath to
lose a technician o f W olf’s sk ill, rehired the form er p riest to com plete a national
chorographic survey u p d atin g the eighteenth-century stu d ies o f M aldonado,
La C ondam ine, and Ju an a n d U lloa. W olf soon com piled a p lan o f G uayaquil,
conducted extensive studies o f th e southern coastal p la in s, an d began a national
survey to support Ecuador’s case in the ongoing territorial conflict with Peru, a
project he completed in 1892. L ik e M enten, W olf also ch astised local practices
as out o f touch with European scientific norm s; for in stan ce, he criticized m ost
Ecuadorian m aps because th e y featured the Q uito m erid ia n as the longitudi
nal reference rather than th e P a ris or Greenwich m erid ia n s then in vogue in
Europe.20
M enten’s and W o lf’s la stin g contributions as bro kers o f cartographic m o
dernity can best be seen in th e career o f one o f their stud en ts, the civil engineer
and architect J. G ualberto Pérez. Pérez was h im se lf fro m a hum ble fam ily and
benefited from a governm ent scholarship w hile at th e p olytech n ic. There, he
excelled at drafting until th e school closed in 1876; he th en com pleted his sec
ondary studies at the Jesuit in stitu tio n ; San G abriel, g rad u a tin g in 1882.21 Pérez
then attended Quito’s u n iversity follow ing the in au gu ration in 1883 o f a science
facu lty ru n by form er p olytech n ic students, and he grad u ated with a degree in
civil engineering in 1887. H e so o n secured a position as a m unicipal engineer,
beginning a long-standing relationsh ip w ith the city governm ent that would in
clude several architectural an d cartographical projects. O ne o f the first was the
com pletion o f a cadastral m ap th a t Pérez had begun d ra ftin g in 1885 while still
at Q uito’s university. T his m ap w ould becom e the p rim a ry im age o f the city for
the next two decades (fig. 2.3).22
Pérez’s 1888 cadastral m ap re-im agines earlier tropes in a view consciously
m eant to be m ass produced. T h e c ru x o f the m ap ’s rh eto rical im agery hinges
upon a m erger o f the clích éd visio n o f Q uito’s C ath o lic id en tity with an em
phasis on strict scientific accu racy. U nlike M enten, Pérez retu rn s to the colo
nial convention o f placing P ich in ch a at the top o f the m a p — the first o f several
choices that recall Juan an d U llo a , whose em phasis on th e c ity ’s religiosity is
also echoed in the list o f p u b lic b u ild in gs and m on u m en ts. O f the eighty-five
structures on the map h igh lighted in dark red in a style introduced by M enten’s
1875 p lan , sixty-five have a religiou s affiliation; they in clu d e churches, schools,
and parish seats. Unlike his predecessors, however, Pérez d etails the plans o f in
dividu al homes throughout th e city, a cadastral convention in keeping with one
o f the m ap’s stated goals. He a lso includes the elaborate gard en s o f the Alam eda
M apping the Center o f the World / 35
Fig. 2.3. ]. G u a lb e rto Pérez, Plano de Quito con los planos de todas sus casas por ]. Gualberto Pérez
(1888). C o u rte sy Biblioteca Ecuatorian a “A u re lio Espinosa Pólit," Q uito.
and the p ath s and fountains o f p la z a s such as those o f Santo D om ingo and the
Plaza G rand e, thus conveying a sen se o f the lived experience o f the city’s public
and leisure spaces.
A lth o u gh the m ap was p robably not origin ally com m issioned by the m u
nicipal coun cil, as Pérez was still a n g lin g for the term s o f his p aym ent when he
presented h is d raft to the council in 1887, it was indelibly m arked b y its potential
for ad m in istrative functionality. For exam ple, street nam es are clearly labeled
on every b lo ck , facilitating cross-referencing. M oreover, the to tal num ber o f
houses on each street appears in a list n ext to that o f public bu ild in gs. Plotted
empty lots on the eastern edges o f th e city transform the m ap into a working
cadastre th at the m unicipality co u ld u se to track ongoing grow th and to fa
cilitate taxation . The outlying areas rem ain nam eless, identified on ly by their
proxim ity to larger avenues, su ch as “ C alle N E de la C arrera de G u ayaqu il,”
which ru n s near A lam eda Park betw een C alles G uayaquil an d V argas. The
inclusion o f these barely traced a rteries reifies the m u n icip ality’s territorial de
signs u p o n its o u tlyin g c o m m u n itie s, illu strated m ost c le a rly b y Pérez’s
appending o f a blank sheaf o f p ap ers on which to record fu rth e r construction.
The fu tu re is clear: soon the c ity w o u ld expand into the “v a c a n t” environs,
rolling over its haciendas and ind igen ou s com m unities. The m ap would shape
the territo ry.23
Pérez con strued his m ap as Q u ito ’s first cartographic com m od ity. When
36 \ Mapping the Center o f the World
presenting the work to the council, he a rticu la te d a well-tuned sales pitch high
lighting not only its administrative uses b u t a lso the difficulties he experienced
during the d raftin g process. He p articu la rly em phasized the tu m u ltu o u s na
ture o f the cadastral measurements due to “ th e opposition o f m ost h ousehold
ers who did not allow me to take the n e c e ssa ry m easurem ents” as w ell as the
considerable am ount o f time he com m itted to the project. He argu ed that these
travails justified a fee o f twelve hundred sucres for the com pletion o f the work,
a figure he characterized as modest com pared to the three thousand sucres that
W olf had received three years earlier for h is less detailed m ap o f G u a y a q u il.24
These argum ents resonated with the m u n icip a l council, which n ot o n ly agreed
to pay his fee but also presented him w ith a gold m edal for his “p atrio tic ” ser
vice, an action that sym bolically conjoined th e cartographer an d th e cabildo
as co-producers o f the map.25 This allian ce w as furth er cem ented w ith the one
hundred reproductions produced by E rh ard Frères, a Parisian firm th at had
previously produced several M exican an d A rgentine maps. A g a in , th e cabildo
highlighted its authorial role by in co rp oratin g a notation in d icatin g th at the
idea for the project and its scope o rigin ated w ith the council. U p o n a rriv a l in
October 1889, the copies o f the map were d istrib uted for display in offices and
classrooms as the public face o f the c ity .26 W hen Teodoro W o lf su bseq u en tly
reproduced this m ap alongside his own o f G u ayaq u il in his 1892 geograph y text,
the map rhetorically reached the pinnacle o f its power in a work fu n d e d b y the
national government.
The repeated utterance o f authorial ow nership over a map establish es legiti
mate claim to the image and, through the im age, to the dom ination o f the land
scape it describes. The case o f Pérez’s m ap dem onstrates an attem pt b y a young
engineer to inscribe his own authority as a cartographer w h ile a lso serving
the interests o f a m unicipality eager to consolid ate its control over its outlying
regions. The regular replication o f this ren d erin g in subsequent d ecad es illus
trates the degree to which the fusion o f religiou s, civic, and scientific authority
resonated as the prim ary qualities o f Q u ito late into the nin eteen th century.
Despite appearing more than a decade a fte r the end o f Garcia M oren o’s rule, the
Pérez map crystallized the Garcian p arad igm . The relevance o f th is fram ework
declined soon thereafter as a new public sphere and visual culture cam e to local
prominence.
nate these sym bols to a w id e audience. Som e were o ld er im ages recon figu red
for modern tim es, such as th e réintroduction o f th e French tricolore d u rin g th e
Third Republic. O thers w ere brand new yet attem p ted to adbrn them selves in
the trappings and weight o f the historical past, su ch as the adoption o f h ig h la n d
dress by some m em bers o f the British nobility. T h ese ubiquitou s new sy m b o ls
produced a legible cascad e o f allegorical im agery th a t its e lf inspired a sim p li
fied view o f national id en tity, one that om itted th e p articip ation o f those w h o
existed outside these m y th sca p e s.27 These in c re a sin g ly com m od ified im ages
appeared on a d izzyin g v a rie ty o f cerem onial a n d fu n c tio n a l goods, in clu d in g
m aps and urban view s. From route m aps to ro ad atlases to tourist guides, th e
niim ber o f com m ercially available m aps increased exponen tially, often in c o rp o
rating new graphic sym b o ls illustrating national m etaph ors. The m ap was th u s
re-imagined as a m ass-p ro d u ced com m odity, co n su m e d b y tourists and lo c a ls
alike, that reified pow er relations while encouraging th e developm ent o f specific
industrial, com m ercial, o r to u rist econom ies.28
Ecuadorian visu a l c u ltu re engaged these in tern ation al tropes, reconfigu rin g
and re-im agining th em in d ialogue with local con d itio n s and power relatio n s.
The desire for a p rim o rd ial, authentic, and ro m an ticized folk so prom in ent in
European nationalist im a g e ry produced a local co n u n d ru m due to the perceived
degradation o f the E c u a d o ria n indigenous p o p u latio n . A s in Peru or M ex ico ,
the Ecuadorian state solved th is problem b y ig n o rin g th e contem porary s itu
ation o f indigenous com m u n ities while em bracing p re-C o lu m b ian c u ltu res in
the abstract.29 T h is e ffo rt involved the production o f lau d atory portraits o f th e
Incaic sovereign A ta h u a lp a and his lieutenant R u m iñ a h u i, personages d o u
bly removed from con tem p orary indigenous peoples as a result o f th eir In caic
(Peruvian) roots. A s im ila r object o f fascin ation w as fo u n d in con tem p orary
A m azonian tribes o n ly recen tly “encountered” b y c ivilizatio n . The exam p les
o f Juan León M era’s no vel Cum andá and the co n tro versial inclusion o f A m a
zonian nudes at the 1889 U n iversal E xposition in P aris initiated a fasc in a tio n
with the visual pom p o f an idealized indigeneity. T h ese im ages were c a re fu lly
disassociated from the laborers o f the h ighland h acien d as or cacao p lan tatio n s,
characters portrayed as “ degenerate” in lettered circles. In stead, nostalgic m a
quettes and photographs o f the Incaic ru ins o f In gapirca were duly d isp layed
at the nation’s p avilion at M a d rid ’s Exposición H ispan o -A m erican o in 1892, as
was a life-size sculpture o f an A m azonian S h u a r w arrio r (a tribe better k n o w n
at the time as the Jívaros).30 A t the 1893 C o lu m bian E xh ibition in Chicago, th ese
‘heroic” icons gave way to the weavers o f the con tem p orary O tavalo tribe, w h ose
industrious” entrepreneu rship proved an excep tio n to the ru le o f in d igen ou s
barbarism , as Brooke L arso n has eloquently noted.31
The intersection o f th is nationally p roduced v is u a l cu ltu re w ith in te rn a
tionally accessible geograph ic and cartographic iconography also began in C h i
cago. On the occasion o f the 1893 exhibition, a co n so rtiu m o f G u ayaqu il-b ased
bankers tied to the d a ily D iario de Avisos collab orated w ith the governm ent to
38 \ M apping the C enter o f the World
to make the case again st Peru. A n abridged version was bankrolled in 1905 b y an
o r g a n iz a t io n called the J u n t a Patriótica N acio n al (JPN), which c o u n t e d liberals,
c o n s e r v a t i v e s , a n d several clerics— in clu d in g b oth Vacas G alin d o an d Federico
González Suárez, then bishop o f Ibarra— am o n g its m em bership. E ach o f these
p u b lic a t io n s argu ed for a “Greater E cu a d o r” th at bordered B razil an d whose ter
ritory included the headwaters o f the A m a z o n . W hen outright h ostilities broke
out in A pril 19 10 , the junta quickly circu lated a separate pam phlet th at included
six maps viv id ly illustratin g the relevant colonial and n in eteenth-century trea
ties. Am ong these view s was one arg u in g th a t Peru considered E c u a d o r’s ter
ritory to end ju st o ff the eastern edge o f th e A n d ean spine. T h is cla im proved
particularly effective in rallying the E c u a d o ria n populace to A lfa r o ’s side, and
the map was rep rin ted in various new spapers across the country.36
A longside th is collaboration w ith th e C h u rch , the m ilita ry an d civilia n s
cooperated in th e form ation o f a p u re ly sec u la r b o d y called th e So cied ad
Geográfica de Q uito (SGQ ) that in clu d ed prom inent m ilitary officers such as
the president’s brother, Olmedo A lfa ro , as w ell as G u alberto Pérez and L u is
Tufiño, d irecto r o f the N ational O b servato ry in Q uito’s A la m e d a P ark. T he
group successfully lobbied the governm ent fo r fu n d in g in M arch 19 10 an d was
charged thenceforth with expanding lo ca l cartographic study in su pp ort o f na
tional security. G u alb erto Pérez q u ick ly engaged in a survey o f the southern
regions under d ispute while the body advocated splitting the vast O riente prov
ince into two d istricts in order to better a d m in iste r the A m azo n ian region. The
group also em braced the stock liberal m easu re o f creating a civil registry.37 M ost
importantly, th ey called for the inaugu ration o f a m ilitary geographic corps or
ganized along the French model so as to create a national topographic m ap. A s
articulated b y L u is T u fiñ o in a letter to th e M in istry o f Public W orks, which
was later circu lated as a pam phlet, th is co rp s w ould lead team s o f u n iversity
students into th e field to conduct th e n e cessa ry surveys, thus e n h an cin g the
students’ p ractical knowledge while acceleratin g the m apping process. T u fiñ o
argued that such a move would not o n ly help national defense bu t w o u ld also
increase the p otential for tourism and international investm ent.38
Tufiño’s p am ph let proved to be a b lu ep rin t for the future developm ent o f a
geographic corps, yet the endeavor h ad to b e postponed after A lfa ro le ft office
in August 19 11. However, the SG Q p ro ved m ore successful in ch allen gin g the
clerical vision o f Q uito as a sacred city b y cem enting its own secu lar m arkers in
key locations w ith in the city. This p rocess b egan when A lfa ro bequ eath ed the
group the fo rm er Japanese pavilion fro m the 1909 National E xp o sition (held to
commemorate th e centennial o f E cu a d o rian independence) to u se as a p erm a
nent headquarters. The exposition h ad h elp ed develop the old D o m in ican horse
pastures (know n as the Recoleta) into a fash ion able park ringed b y “m od ern ”
structures such as the building in qu estion. A m ore significant event, however,
occurred when Archbishop González S u árez approved the razing o f a p yram id al
observation station erected by the G eod esic M ission on the P an ecillo w ith the
42 \ M ap p in g the Center o f the W orld
Fig. 2.5. P au l Loiseau-R ousseau, G eodesic M on u m en t, A lam ed a Park, Q u ito . Photograph by the
author.
centuries earlier, an A n d e a n condor was perched w ith a globe upon its w in gs, an
image that cemented th e capital and nation’s em brace o f its planetary centrality.
As the monument w ent up in A lam eda P ark , th e Sociedad G eografica laid
claim to its third sig n ifica n t site w ithin the c ity in u n d er two years, w ith the
first being its inh abiting o f the Japanese p a v ilio n an d the second, its su ccess
fu l attempt to take con tro l o f the Panecillo. E ach o f these sites existed w ith in
an inhabited sym bolic landscape. A lam ed a Park and the Recoleta each la y on
the outskirts of town n ear the largest swaths o f new construction in th e m od
ernizing city. The S G Q th us inserted itself in to m od ernizin g territory, a n act
underscoring the need to p lan for colonizing th e environ s o f the T u ru b a m b a
and Anaquito plains. T h e uproar over the p y ra m id on the Panecillo not on ly
linked the society w ith th e Liberal assault on th e C h u rch but also allow ed it to
claim a site whose p an o ram ic view o f the capital h a d eclipsed the eastern view
from Itchimbia as the m ost “accurate” point o f reference, given the su itab ility o f
its position for surveyin g the southern plains an d its proxim ity to an orth ogonal
projection.
The first urban m ap created by a m em ber o f th e SG Q makes this civ iliz in g
and expansionist gaze exp licit. The work in q u estio n , G ualberto Perez’s Quito
actual y del porvenir, presents a utopian design intended to guide the c ity ’s fu tu re
development. The b lu e p rin t is based on a re g u la r grid frequently in terru p ted
with broad diagonal avenues ending at circu lar p la z a s in a m anner rem iniscent
of Haussmann’s plan fo r P aris, likely from the influ ence o f contacts w ith in the
French mission (fig. 2.6). However, Perez avoids H au ssm an n ’s incisions o n the
traditional city by en sh rin in g the built environm ent at the center o f the fu tu re
city. An unaltered versio n o f his cadastral m ap (the original m ap had recen tly
been updated to includ e new construction, at th e behest o f the m u n icip ality)
thus is the basis for th e c ap ital’s core: the Q u ito “ del porvenir” begins o n ly in
the outer environs. N o su ch consideration for preservation , however, is g iven to
existing communities o n the northern and sou th ern plains. These are colonized
by the grid in a m an ner rem iniscent o f the “ fro n tie r expansion” that M a u ricio
Tenorio Trillo has id en tified for Porfirian M exico C ity.40 A s in M exico, Perez’s
proposed suburbanization o f Quito shifted new developm ent away fro m a pre
served center and flatten ed outlying h acien d as a n d In dian villages, a ll in the
name of an ill-defined “ del porvenir” that em bo d ied a set o f practices id en tified
with the legitimation o f the orthogonal gaze an d the com m em oration o f Q u ito ’s
place within a pantheon o f capitals.
Perez’s design d id not im m ediately com e to fru itio n , although one cou ld
argue that it anticipated th e dom inant o rien tatio n o f the Plan R e g u la d o r de
Quito drawn up in 19 4 2 b y G uillerm o Jones O d rio zo la. O f m ore im m ed ia te
importance was its e x p a n sio n o f the audience fo r cartographic treatm en ts o f
urban development. T h e m ap circulated widely, app earin g in major new spapers
across the country an d w hetting the public’s ap p etite for a com m ercial strain o f
cartographic imaging.
Mapping the Center o f the World / 45
which the city adopted as its official stan d ard . From the start, th e c ity council
saw the m ap not on ly as an education al to ol, as in 1888, but also as a possibly
marketable com m odity, and it ordered red u ced wall-size copies in F e b ru a ry .48
As with the various m aps o f Q uito, b e gin n in g with that o f L a C o n d am in e,
one of the c ru cial features o f the H errera-R ivaden eira m ap (figs. 2.8 an d 2.9)
is the establishm ent o f authorial le g itim acy . The title o f the m ap provides a
summary o f its history, identifying not o n ly the general who ordered the m ap
but also his intention to donate it to th e m u n icip ality precisely fo r th e purpose
of celebrating the centennial. G eneral D o n R afael A lm eida’s sign a tu re figures
prominently beneath the title, flan k ed b y the autographs o f the tw o cartogra
phers. A second claim to legitim ation lies to the left o f the title, in th e fo rm o f a
reproduction o f the m unicipal ordinance th an k in g the EM G for its fine w o rk.49
The im age o f the ordinance appears as i f etched on an ancient scroll, a nos
talgic evocation echoing the clim ate o f h isto ricism o f the 1922 celebrations that
was also m an ifested in the production o f a com m em orative vo lu m e pen ned by
Isaac Barrera o f the National A cad em y o f H istory, as well as tertulias or sem i
nars dedicated to discussing the city’s h isto ry, essay com petitions, an d newspa
per articles on the independence w ars.50 R h etorically, the m ap’s a u th o rity thus
results specifically from this appreciation o f the city’s glorious p a st alon g with
the author’s technical prowess. In d ivid u a l claim to authorial legitim acy, how
ever, has receded in the face o f increasing institutional (military) authority.
Chorographic details incorporate not o n ly the built environm en t b ut also
engage m unicipal planning designs in a com m unicentric statem ent th at again
reinforces class, spatial, and racial d iv isio n s. A color-coded schem e delim its
the city’s p arochial divisions. A s w ith earlier m aps, the southern w orking-class
and mixed: race d istricts o f La M agd alen a and Chim bacalle are n ot presented
as fully developed parts o f the city, an d o n ly the m ain streets are h ighlighted.
In the north, however, the area o f S a n ta P risca parish that w as targeted for
transformation into the upscale M a ris c a l Su cre suburb is p resen ted as i f a l
ready com pleted, w ith fu ll colorization in d ark green. Its street ou tlin es belie
this designation, as they are identified b y dotted lines representing th eir status
as planned rather than completed co n stru ctio n . The district th u s represents a
paradoxical d u a lity as a “ fu lly u rb an ” area as yet unbuilt. Its sta tu s as p art o f
Quito’s aristocratic civitas starkly contrasts w ith the obscuring o f w orking-class
and rural d istricts. However, this in clu sio n w as not extended to th e entirety o f
the Benalcazar parroquia (civil parish); its outer edges received th e sam e color
ization as the southern .parishes, in a gestu re sim ilar to the rep resentation o f
chozas in the 19 21 census map.
As with p rio r m aps, featured b u ild in g s also provide great in sig h t into the
image’s com m unicentric values. To b e g in w ith , abstract lines replace bu ild in g
plans throughout, w ith the exception o f p u b lic buildings colored red. There is
no table listing all the structures, bu t a n a ly sis reveals the furth er d im in ish m en t
of religious m arkers and a corresponding grow th in markers o f c iv il adm in istra-
49
Fig. 2.8. Luis Herrera and Ezequiel Rivadeneira, mid-range detail of Plano de la ciudad de Quito levantado por orden del Sr. G en era l Don Rafael A lm eid a , S., Jefe del E .M .G ., y obse
quiado al Ilustre Concejo M u n icip a l de Quito en H om enaje al C entenario de la Batalla de Pichincha (1922). This view shows the scroll used to document municipal acceptance of the
map. Courtesy Biblioteca Ecuatoriana “Aurelio Espinosa Pólit,” Quito.
5°
M apping the Center o f the World / 51
tion. One o f the m ost in terestin g facets o f the m ap, however, is the inclusion
o f n u m e r o u s private b u ild in g s, shaded in gray, w h ich collectively declare the
actualization o f in d u strial a n d residential districts even i f they are still und er
construction. To the sou th , fo r instance, nascent in d u stry appears represented
b y the El Retiro m ill and a textile plant. To the n o rth , th is im age is m irrored
b y well-known elite ch alets su ch as Francisco D u r in i’s V illa Trento and V illa
Trieste as well as La C ircasian a , the residence o f con servative politician Jacinto
jijón y Caam año. The sp a tia l dynam ics o f the city’s subsequent zoning divisions
into a southern in d u strial b e lt and the northern su b u rb s are therefore an tici
pated by the m ap’s iconography.
This m ap also b ecam e th e object o f the th ird o f th e E M G ’s com m em ora
tive commodities when p oster-sized , red-tinted reproductions appeared in local
bookstores and new sstands th at M ay. These reprints incorporated a thick b o r
der highlighting local b u sin esses, following the lead o f H igley and Holguin Bal-
cázar’s embrace o f the m ap as advertising space. U n lik e the edition given to the
m unicipality and other in stitu tio n s, this version d id not feature the m unicipal
ordinance and the extended title sum m arizing the m ap ’s history. Instead, it h ad
the simple title “ Plano de la C iu d ad de Quito en el C en ten ario de la Batalla de
Pichincha.” Public b u ild in gs appear as on the earlier version, but this time there
was an accompanying list th at would m ake them e asily identifiable to a tourist
or business traveler. T h is em p h asis on legibility, com bined w ith a smaller size—
the reprint was app roxim ately one-third the size o f th e earlier m ap— increased
their accessibility and p racticality.
The commercial success o f the H errera-Rivadeneira m ap marked the great
est level o f m ilitary carto grap h ic preeminence to th is p oint; however, its p ro
duction would expand e x p o n en tially over the rest o f th e decade. The a rrival
later in 1922 o f an Italian m ilita ry m ission, invited to h elp Ecuador m odernize
its arm ed forces in respon se to a sim ilar French a d v iso ry trip to Peru, accel
erated this process. T h e Ita lia n com m anders encouraged the developm ent o f
m ilitary engineering an d p ersu ad ed President José L u is Tam ayo to inaugurate
a course in topographical stu d ies under the auspices o f Lieutenant Colonel L u is
T. Paz y M iño, who w ould subsequently rise to prom inence as an adm inistrator
and cartographic h isto ria n .5* O ther Italian initiatives in cluded courses on the
study o f cartography, geodesy, and topography th at led to extensive surveyin g
o f border regions. T h ro u gh th e political turm oil o f the m i d - i 9 2 0 S , calls for a
national atlas became com m onplace both in the m ilita ry and in the press. One
o f President Isidro A yora’s first decrees upon com ing to pow er following the Ju
lian Revolution ordered th at such a m ap be created u n d e r the auspices o f m an y
o f those involved in carto grap h ic studies over the p ast decades, including Paz
y M iño, Luis Tufiño, E zeq u iel Rivadeneira, and th e Italian colonel Giácom o
Rocca. Extensive cartographic training took place in 1927 as efforts intensified to
form the special corps th at T u fiñ o had first called for in 19 11. On A pril u , 1928,
Ayora finally inaugurated th e Servicio Geográfico M ilita r (SGM ), which w ould
52 \ M apping the Center o f the World
One o f the first o f the new m aps w as an oth er plan o f Q uito, com pleted in
1932 S4 Once a g a in , the m ilitary chose to u n veil and present the fin ish ed work
to the m unicip ality on a national holiday, A u g u st 10 (Independence Day). T he
map represents th e first conspicuous a ttem p t to provide a fu ll to p o grap h ical
description o f th e city. Earlier m aps h a d tend ed to end contour lin es at th e edge
of the constructed area, which had th e e ffect o f m aking m ou n tain s lik e P ich
incha, Itchim bia, an d the Panecillo ap p ear as sm all rises that su d d en ly ended.
The S G M ’s m ap , however, weaves to p o g rap h ic a l lines in betw een th e m ajor
constructed areas and preserves the la n d sc a p e ’s irregularity. T h is approach ac
centuates the d iffic u lty that con stru ctin g th e city m ust have p resented, as can
be seen very clearly b y exam ining th e alteration between p eaks an d flatten ed
city blocks in areas like El Tejar, for exam p le. The contour lines, how ever, also
bespeak the con tin ued presence o f an elite vision o f the city due to selective in
terruptions alortg upscale areas such as the M a risca l while con tinuing u nbroken
through the w orking-class housing d istric ts north o f El Tejar.
A sim ilar u n d erstan d in g o f Q uito’s socio spatial divisions app eared in the
national atlas com pleted later that y ear. O n a page dedicated to th e c a p ita l,
the SG M chose n ot to include the en tire c ity b u t to elim inate th e now solid ly
working-class d istric ts o f La M a g d ale n a an d C h im bacalle ju st sou th o f the
Panecillo w hile includin g the northern A ñ a q u ito plains. T h is decision not only
symbolically la id claim to the northern environs but also presented a p articu la r
constitution o f the city’s public im age as form ed b y its colonial core, the upscale
residential n o rth , and a landscape u n sp o ile d b y in d u strial p ro d u ctio n . T he
decision to re tu rn to the colonial c u sto m o f u sin g the Q uito m erid ia n as the
main coordinate o f the graticule rein forced th is identification o f th e c ity w ith
its Spanish, w h ite, and elite past. It a lso su pp orted a growing m ovem ent b y the
local and n ation al governm ent to encourage day trips to the n orth .
As noted earlier, state propaganda d esign atin g Q uito as a c ity o f strik in g
colonial churches h ad been in vo gu e sin ce at least the days o f th e Ecuador in
Chicago com m em orative volume an d w as echoed in the various m ap s produced
through the early 1920s. The governm ent b egan to target a foreign audience o f
business lead ers an d leisure travelers as e arly as 1923, when it b e g a n to edit a
publication title d El Ecuador Comercial. T h e m agazine focused on th e p otential
for international investm ent but also featu red portraits and panoram ic view s o f
the country’s m ajor attractions, b e g in n in g w ith the capital and th en p roceed
ing through th e other major cities a n d m onu m ents. R estaurants, d ep artm en t
stores, bookstores, and other establish m ents purchased ad vertising space in the
magazine, o fte n includin g p hotographs o f th eir proxim ity to the c ity ’s m ajor
plazas or colo n ial architectural m on u m en ts. In the late 1920s, A yo ra’s go vern
ment produced targeted publications su ch as Ecuador: Revista de Propaganda y
Turismo, w h ich w as targeted to a V en ezu elan audience and overseen b y th e d ip
lomatic m ission in Bolivar’s hom eland. T h e serial included statistical in fo rm a
tion on the n atio n ’s economic prod u ction w h ile also featuring vign ettes, p ictu r
54 \ M apping the Center o f the World
Fig. 2.10. Froilán H olgu in Balcazar, Plano indicador de Quito (1935). C ourtesy Library o f C ongress.
on the Panecillo. Besides establishing the n eed for a m onum ent in Q uito itself,
the parties hoped to restore the pyram id o f O yam baro, which had been bu ilt ac
cording to La C o n d am in e’s original designs (fig. 2.11) the century before but that
had since fallen into disrepair. Moreover, th e y hoped to build a second replica
at Caraburo, a site near the town o f San A n to n io de Pichincha, tw enty kilom e
ters north o f Q uito, near the Equator.58 T h is latter pyram id represents the first
significant attem pt to create an equatorial d estination on the city’s ou tskirts.
The anniversary provided an op p ortu nity to certify Ecuador’s identification
with the geographic advances o f both the first and second m issions. A bicenten
nial steering com m ittee was formed in N ovem ber 1935 and consisted o f govern
ment and cu ltu ral functionaries, representatives from the Servicio G eogrâfico
Militar, and several m em bers o f the C o m ité France-Am érique, an organ o f the
French foreign service that sought to in crease ties between A m erican nations
and France. P resid in g over the com m ittee w as art historian José G ab riel N a
varro, who strongly em braced Ecuador’s S p a n ish cultural heritage. T h e events
the group plann ed for M ay 1936 included an assortm ent o f galas, lectures, and
pageants, with p rim a ry events occurring in b o th Q uito and R iobam ba, birth-
56 \ Mapping the Center o f the World
Fig. 2 .11. Charles Marie de L a C on dam in e, Plan Profil et Elévation des deux Pyramides. C o u rtesy
Library o f Congress.
C o rp o ra c ió n de Fomento
HOTEL CORDILLERA
TA C O R P O R A C IO N D E F O M E N T O D E L EL PREFERIDO
ECUADOR,
está ayudando al desenvolvim iento
Agrícola, Industrial y POR EL T U R IS M O
Turístico del País.
F U N C IO N A EN Q U IT O D ir e c c ió n : B flT flN
C a s illa N ó m . 2 8 - 1 6
Fig. 2 .12 . Servicio G eográfico M ilitar, d e ta il (photograph o f m onum ent, low er left) from Plano de
la ciudad de Quito (A pril 1946). C o u rte sy B ib lioteca Ecuatoriana “A u relio E sp in o sa Pólit,” Q uito.
advertisem ents. The la tte r cater to the intern ation al lu x u ry traveler and in clud e
airlin es, travel agencies, an d lu x u ry hotels su ch a s the C olón M ajestic. L o c a l
travel needs are also rep resen ted , w ith ads fo r M ic h e lin tires, car rental co m
p an ies, banks, m u seu m s, th e national railw ay com pan y, and Luigi R ota’s rad io
an d electronics store.
In keeping w ith th e gro w in g association o f site-sp ecific photography w ith
cartograph ic p roduction, th e im ages in these tw o row s o f photos and ad vertise
m ents define a com m u n icen tric identity that com bin es various tropes developed
over the previous several centuries. The first o f th ese identifies Q uito’s religious
m issio n a ry im pulse, s y m b o liz e d b y a p hotograp h o f the c ity ’s cathedral. T h e
second concerns its c o sm o p o litan ism , as represented b y a shot o f the recen tly
erected statue o f S im ó n B olívar, a national sy m b o l despite h is Venezuelan o ri
g in . T h e third, in v o lvin g p o i traits o f the n earb y m o u n ta in s o f Ilin iza a n d El
A lta r, for the first tim e in corporates a coun tryside w hose “ barbaric” indigen ous
p op u latio n s had been su c c e ssfu lly tam ed and elid ed . L ast, bu t not least, is the
1936 m onum ent raised at S a n A ntonio de P ic h in ch a (see fig. 2.12). Flan k ed b y
advertisem ents for h o tels, a travel agency, an d e ven a developm ent b a n k , the
m on um en t in this p ro d u c tio n crystallized th e ch ron otope o f the c ity ’s g lo b al
cen trality that had b een d evelopin g for centuries yet w h ich could now be d efin ed
th rou gh a shorthand id e n tify in g a specific locale: th e site now know n as mitad
del mundo.
Hispanismo
Site, Heritage, Memory
The city of Quito is a precious jewel and spiritual fountain, a witness o f the
linkages between Ecuador and the renewal o f Latin culture. Quito, without
Gothic art, born for the future, must never let itself be defrauded by pressing
modernity and must conserve for posterity the purity in which Latin America
was formed and the spirit in which it was born.
Julio [Giulio] A ristide Sartorio, 1934
61
62 \ H ispanism o
The rh eto rical association o f Q uito w ith Spain sim ultaneously d rew upon
a tw entieth-century global m ovem ent k n o w n as H ispanism , w h ich identified
a common c u ltu ra l raza between S p a in a n d its form er colonies; ad heren ts of
Hispanism b elieved that la raza's spiritu al p u rity would redeem th e w o rld from
its current m aterialistic m orass.2 By conceiving the city as a sp iritu a l, adm inis
trative, and a rtistic center grounded in its Sp an ish heritage, E cu ad o rian hispani
stas attem pted to situate the city’s h isto ry on the world stage, p a rtic u la rly with
respect to its g lo rio u s artwork. The m ovem ent also sought to tra n sce n d local
political d ifferences through a u n ify in g rhetoric that m ight supersede the tradi
tional liberal-conservative and class d ivides. T hese political and so c ia l divisions
were especially sh arp durin g the econom ic and political crisis o f th e interwar
years, an era th a t coincided with the greatest expansion o f the m y th o f Quito’s
Hispanic ch aracter. D u rin g this tim e, Q u ito ’s H ispanists built u p o n an intel
lectual legacy w ith roots in the colonial p erio d but that found its m o d ern for
mulation in th e h istorical and religious p hilosop h y o f the city’s arch bish op , Fed
erico G onzález Suárez. W orking with the institu tion al support o f th e National
Academy o f H istory, González Suárez’s stud en ts put aside regional an d political
debates to ad van ce a scholarly vision o f Q u ito and Ecuador firm ly grounded
in its colonial h eritage. In so doing, th ey n o t on ly sought to h eal th e wounds
of the Liberal R evolu tio n but also attem p ted to lim it the active e x p a n sio n o f
the socialist an d indigenist m ovem ents. Q u ito, as the local sy m b o l p a r excel
lence o f S p a n ish cu ltu re, becam e th eir can vas and their m u seu m , a c ity to b e
revered and celebrated because o f its redem ptive qualities. By reh abilitatin g the
city center, id e n tify in g and protecting its architectu ral m arvels, a n d elaborating
a complex w eb o f Spanish cultural iconography, the city’s H ispan ists invented a
tradition o f a w h itened and legible S p an ish city th at, paradoxically, contrasted
with its social re a lity as a burgeoning m estizo and indigenous space as the elite
fled to chalets a n d v illa s on the ou tskirts.3
tim e to time, particularly in 1846, when it was revealed th at Q ueen M aria C ris
tin a had been plotting w ith fo rm e r Ecuadorian p residen t Ju a n José Flores to
reestablish a monarchy in the A n d ea n republic.10 T h ese tensions briefly paled in
light o f the imminent threat p osed by the United States, whose trium ph in the
1846—1848 war with M exico in sp ire d a newfound sen se o f H ispanoam erican-
ism voiced at the second tran sreg io n al congress in L im a .“ However, antipathy
resum ed following Spain’s 1864 invasion o f Peru’s C h in ch a Islands in an attempt
to restrict British access to th e lucrative Peruvian gu an o trade. The incursion led
to a display o f hemispheric so lid a rity by the nations o f S p a n ish Am erica, which
broke o ff relations with S p ain as a bloc in order to su p p o rt Peru.
Nevertheless, the 1860s a lso saw progress in c u ltu ra l d ialogu e through the
efforts o f institutions like th e R e a l Academ ia Española de la Lengua. Following
extensive restructuring in 1858, the once exclusively p e n in su la r organization
began offering corresponding m em berships to S p a n ish A m e rican intellectu
a ls.12 Although the A rgentine D om ingo Sarm iento fa m o u sly refused m em ber
ship, six prominent in tellectu als, including P eru vian Felip e Pardo A liaga and
M exicans Bernardo Couto a n d Joaq u ín Pesado, h a d Join ed b y 1865.13 In 1871,
the Real Academ ia moved to th aw relations, iced b y th e C h inch a invasion, by
callin g for corresponding n a tio n a l chapters in the fo rm e r colonies— the first
tim e that Am erican linguists h a d been treated as cu ltu ra l equ als by the mother
country. The overture soon b o re fru it as first C olom bia an d then Ecuador em
braced the initiative, follow ed b y the other republics o ver the next several de
cades.14 A fter 1885, the Real A cad em ia’s efforts received su p p o rt from the Unión
Iberoamericana, an organization seeking greater com m ercial and cultural unity
and headed by Iberian sen ator an d form er Cuban in ten d an t M ariano Cancio
V illaa m il. A s a consortium o f lib eral persuasion, th e gro u p advocated open
ing up trade barriers betw een S p a in and its colonies. W h ile its more fan cifu l
notions, such as the call fo r a new transatlantic state, w ere doom ed to failure,
it succeeded in fostering c lo ser ties with the form er colonies. For exam ple, its
m em bership successfully lobbied for the participation o f m ost A m erican states
in the 1892 M adrid H istorical A m erican Exposition celebrating the quadricen-
tennial o f Columbus’s vo yage.15
These Iberian appeals fo r transnational political an d cu ltu ral structures co
incided with calls for n ation al regeneration in the w ake o f decades o f civil war.
These considerations built u p o n a m etanarrative celebrating an eternal Spain
whose civilizing force had tran sfo rm ed the world. H ow ever, Spain’s own region-
a list divisions and a general su spicion o f M ad rid ’s c en tralizin g tendencies led
m an y to espouse a hybrid n atio n alism building upon m ed ieval notions o f vecin
dad in which each province or kingdom o f Spain had a stak e in national identity.
Barcelona-based conservatives lik e M anuel M ila y Fontanels or Joaquin Rubio,
for instance, sought the roots o f Spain ’s glory in its lo ca l custom s, particularly
the vibrancy o f Catalan C ath o lic ism .16 These precepts w ere taken up by one o f
H ispanism o / 65
the most in flu en tial figures o f late n in eteen th -cen tu ry S p a n ish letters, M a r
celino M enéndez Pelayo, whose H istoria de los heterodoxos españoles (1880—188?)
la u d e d Spain ’s divinely inspired role a s lead er o f the eternal,' n a tu ra l, and C ath
olic spirit w h ile also underscoring th e heterodox com m unity th a t m ad e up its
people. O ther fervent believers in th e p o ssib ility o f Spanish regeneration fol
lo w e d a p o litically liberal line in w h ich C atholicism was replaced b y n atu re as a
unifying force. Intellectuals such as L eop old o A la s (Clarín) or Fern an d o del Rio
m o v e d away fro m the Church to em brace the teachings o f G e rm a n philosopher
Karl Krause regarding nature’s fu n d a m e n ta l spirituality. S im ila rly , the h isto
rian Rafael A lta m ira noted the p o ssib ility o f science reflecting n a tio n a l reality
but held that local personality a n im a te d th e national body.
The lo c a list strain in these a p p e a ls to a higher c o n cep tu alizatio n o f the
Spanish people helped build a b rid ge to th e A m erican rep u b lics a n d to th eir
reconsideration as vibran t p artners w h o cou ld regenerate the fo rm e r m other
country. Figures such as M enéndez P elayo delved into Sp an ish A m e ric a n p o
etry, even ed itin g an anthology o f A m e ric a n works, while A lta m ira p ublicly
extolled the energy that cultural re u n io n w ith the Spanish A m e ric a n republics
could offer an aging peninsula. T h ese ideas o f global redem ption b u ilt upon the
founding m ythologies o f Iberian c o n q u e st as w ell as the stark app reciation o f
economic d isaster represented by S p a in ’s loss o f its last colonies in 1898.
The “ desastre del 98,” as the S p a n ish -A m erica n -C u b a n w ar w as kn ow n on
the p en in sula, also propelled S p a n ish A m e ric a n intellectuals to declare their
solidarity w ith Spain. A t tim es, th is p o sitio n m anifested in v iru le n t antipathy
to the colossus o f the north, as in N ic a ra g u a n Rubén D ario’s fa m o u s w arnings
to Theodore Roosevelt about the sp e c te r o f “a thousand cu b s o f th e Spanish
lion” to the south. Perhaps m ost in flu e n tia l w as U ruguayan José E n riq u e R o d ó ’s
m onumental essay Ariel (1900), w h ich p rovid ed an intellectual d efen se o f anti-
Am ericanism by contrasting the s p iritu a l v ita lity o f p an -H isp an ic you th with
the m aterial decadence o f the U nited States. Ariel becam e a rapid international
best-seller, as p op u lar on the p en in su la as in the A m ericas. In te lle ctu al giants
like M iguel de U nam uno or R afael A lta m ira echoed Rodó b y a llo w in g th at pen
insular regeneration would come th ro u gh collaboration with the vib ra n cy across
the ocean. A lta m ira ’s extensive p raise o f the book led to its em brace across the
political sp ectru m , by intellectuals as v a ried as the aging liberal C la rín and the
conservative A ntonio Goicoechea.17 O ver th e next two decades, A rie lism o and
pan-H ispanism becam e increasingly im p o rtan t m ovem ents across th e region,
and they w ould begin to determ ine state cu ltu ral policies in the 1920s.
The m ovem ent grew more p ervasive. In Spain , the P rim o de R iv era d icta
torship adopted a H ispanist p olicy fo c u se d on developing a role as a cultu ral
leader o f th e H ispanic world. A n n u a l celebrations o f C o lu m b u s’s d iscovery,
now renam ed “ D ía de la R aza,” p la y e d a large role in th is end eavor. Populist
governments in Spanish A m erica a lso em braced the holiday, w h ile sim ultan e
66 \ H ispanism o
“Transcending” Regionalism
Spain’s attem pts to overcome its region alist divisions through an appeal to a
hybrid trans-A tlantic cultu ral com m unity h ad a strong resonance in E cu ado r
ian politics. The regionally biased strife o f the nineteenth century had exposed
severe divisions alon g ideological, cu ltu ra l, and geographical lines. N ostalgia
for the colonial p eriod found early adherents am ong conservative p olitician s
and clerics, o f w h ich form er president Ju a n José Flores is a vivid exam ple. A s
mentioned earlier, h is disillusion with the state o f the nation after h is exile in
the 1840s led h im to em brace the idea th at on ly a m onarchy could restore the
republic to som e m od icum o f stability. A fte r visitin g the courts o f Europe, he
found a sym pathetic ear in Spanish queen M a ria C ristin a, who flirted w ith the
idea of outfitting an expeditionary force to retake the form er A ndean province.
Out of desperation following the 1859 civil war, even G arcia Moreno, whose p er
sonal antipathy toward all things Spanish w as well know n, invited N apoleon III
to make Ecuador a G allic protectorate. W hen that failed, he installed a neocolo-
r.ial regime built upon the old pillars o f church and landowner.
To nurture th is alliance, Garcia M oreno held his nose and approved the fo r
mation of a local chapter o f the Real A cad em ia Española de la Lengua (R A E )
in 1874. This action paved the way for d iplom atic rapprochement, bolstered his
support'with conservatives, and expanded cu ltu ral ties between the two cou n
tries. The Q uito chapter o f the R A E w orked to reestablish form al diplom atic
ties over the next decade, a goal achieved in Feb ru ary 1885, which was earlier
than most o f E cu ad o r’s neighbors were able to accom plish that feat. The group
also provided a local forum for H ispanophilic cultural events, including public
discussion o f lin g u istics and readings o f cu rren t and classical literature. Two
of the R A E ’s m em bers, Julio Castro and th e am ateu r historian Pedro Ferm ín
Cevallos, expan d ed the reach o f its activities when they founded the Q uito
chapter o f U nión Iberoam ericana in 1885. L o c a l chapters in G uayaquil and the
southern city o f M achala followed. In 1889, the group inaugurated a newspaper
that published laud atory portrayals o f Sp an ish culture and called for a H ispanic
trade com m union.25 Despite the group’s obvious energy and initial enthusiasm
from the public, financial difficulties resulted in the newspaper’s early dem ise,
though the center continued its activity.
The grow th o f H ispanophilia soon p erm eated liberal ranks as regard for
the nation’s S p an ish heritage expanded. Even Ju a n M ontalvo, staunch op p o
nent of Spain’s colonial occupation o f C u b a , began to underscore the vita lity
of the Spanish spirit and the heroic deeds o f the conquistadors in his later w rit
ings. This reverence for the rigor and independence o f the Spanish spirit was
most vividly depicted in his posthum ously published Capítulos que se olvidaron
68 \ Hispanismo
his essay, González Suárez seeks an end to this m uddle b y ad van cin g Catholi
cism as a path to national u n ity, notin g that even the m ost rab id ly anticlerical
m e m b e r s o f the Radical Liberal P arty were closet Catholics. He also exhorts the
bishops and priests o f the lan d to disengage from the p olitical squabbles o f the
day to accelerate this process o f u n ification .36
The intellectual roots o f th e p leas m ade in this 1908 essay are varied and
deep There is a clear resonance w ith the calls for national an d transnational re
generation typical o f the H ispan ist vernacular. A n additional influence, which
w o u ld prove a bridge to the new generation, was the endorsem ent o f Catholic
social action advocated by Pope Leo X III in his encyclical Rerum Novarum, a
text'thát González Suárez regu larly cited in sermons and w ritin gs. These ideas
i n s p i r e d a short-lived attem pt to fo rm a Catholic workers’ organization led by a
k r a i tailor, M anuel Sotom ayor y L u n a, and a num ber o f students at the Colegio
San G abriel, Quito’s premier Jesu it secondary school. A lth o u gh the Centro Ob
rero Católico devolved into squ abbling between the organization’s membership
of artisan al laborers and elite, largely conservative teenagers, the experim ent
s e r v e d to cement a friendship betw een González Suárez an d som e o f the coun
try’s fu tu re intellectual leaders, in clud in g the im portant figu res Jacinto Jijón
y Caam año and Julio Tobar D on oso.37 The architects o f a restored Conserva
tive Party in the 1920s that also bu ilt alliances with labor, these tw o individuals
would be am ong the leaders in c ra ftin g a consideration o f local and national
identity that stem m ed directly fro m G onzález Suárez’s th eory o f history.
G onzález Suárez began to prom ulgate his conception o f E cu ad o r’s Hispanic
roots w ith Jijón and other yo u n g in tellectu als at tertulias, or literary salons,
concerning historical and archaeological studies that he b egan hosting in 1908.
The following year, in part to draw Jijón’s m ind away fro m the recent death of
his m other, the archbishop fo rm a liz ed the group as the S o cied ad Ecuatoriana
de Estudios Históricos A m erican o s (SEE H A ). The m em bership also included
the art historian José G abriel N avarro, Jijón’s cousin and genealogist Cristóbal
Gangotena y Jijón, and C arlos M an u el L arrea. Though m ostly o f conservative
political orientation, with G angotena’s m oderate liberalism tem pered by his ob
session w ith aristocratic lineage, the group sought to avoid p artisan historical
writing in deference to their m entor, who circulated his m ethodological treatise
among h is charges. M ore m oderate liberals joined in 1915 w ith the addition o f
Celiano M onge and a literary critic from O tavalo nam ed Isaac Barrera, best
known for his enthusiasm for avant-garde literature and for h is well-regarded bi
ography o f liberal founding fath er Vicente Rocafuerte. W hen G onzález Suárez
died in 1917, Jijón took the helm and expanded the society’s activities to include
the publication o f a bulletin he ban krolled . Their self-proclaim ed professional
ism, based largely on a penchant for extensive citation and th eir contention that
previous work was m ired in legend and hyperbole, received n ational acclaim.
Their reputation as the prem ier school o f historical research encouraged Con
gress to declare them the N ational A cadem y o f H istory (A cadem ia Nacional de
72 \ H ispanism o
H isto riad or A N H ) in 1920, ju st in tim e for the cen ten n ial festivities marking
G uayaquil and Quito’s liberation fro m Spain, events th at invited extemporane
ous p an e g yrics to national greatn ess. T h is prestigious title as a national acad
emy p rovid ed a platform from w h ich to m ake their osten sibly impartial view of
Ecuador’s Spanish and Catholic roots the official national saga.’8
Perhaps the defining work o f th is era is a Jijón essay published in 1919 that
challenges the eighteenth-century claim s o f Jesuit Ju a n d e Velasco concerning
the existence o f a pre-Incaic K in gd o m o f Quito. Follow ing th e earlier writings of
G onzález Suárez, Jijón disputes the notion o f an autochthonous, proto-national
p olity o r econom ic confederation. He dism isses V elasco fo r having based his
claim s on oral legend rather th a n on archaeological evid ence.-Jijón also critiques
a contem porary study by Paul R iv et (who had hosted th e precocious youngster a
few years earlier in Paris) rep ortin g th at bronze tools h ad been in use prior to the
arrival o f the Incas, another con troversial statement h in tin g at the possibility of
a c iviliz in g im pulse among the “ b arb aric” Ecuadorian indigenes.
T h e obvious politicization o f Jijón ’s article drew com plain ts from the Left—
p a rtic u la rly from the pen o f th e L oja socialist Pío Ja ra m illo Alvarado, whose
polem ical El indio ecuatoriano in sp ire d futu re indigenist w ritings.’5The ongoing
controversy propelled Jijón to th e forefront o f the C onservative Party, for which
he stood as presidential candidate in 1924. His loss in th is disputed election ledto
a failed coup attempt, a short exile in Colom bia, and h is official distancing from
the A N H . In the afterm ath o f the Ju lia n Revolution, Jijó n returned to Ecuador
as the undisputed leader o f the C onservative Party. T h e platform he engineered
from th is position gave rise to a tw o-volum e id eolo gical treatise titled Política
conservadora (1929). Besides d elin eatin g the p arty’s p osition s on economic and
social m atters, the text presented a historical account o f th e formulation of na
tion al identity arguing that the C onquest and C h ristia n devotion transformed
the A m e ric an continent and b ro u gh t its aboriginal inhabitants into the cradle
o f civ iliz a tio n .40 Jijón view ed Q u ito as the epicenter o f th is civilizing Catholic
nation because o f its ability to evolve beyond its p rovin cialism by becoming an
a rtistic and spiritual fou n tain h ead for the rest o f the H ispanic world during the
seventeenth century.41
Jijó n ’s articulation o f Q u ito’s u n iqu e cultural m erits deployed a trope that
o rigin ated with González S u árez b ut was largely p o p u larized by his former col
leagues in the National A cad em y o f History. Jijón’s fello w conservative, Julio To
bar D onoso, for instance, w rote a series o f essays d escribin g the Catholic sensi
b ility o f the Ecuadorian nation along with biographical sketches of outstanding
m em bers o f the colonial creole elite .42 Isaac Barrera suspended his modernist
lean in gs to contribute a p a n e g y ric to Q uito’s eighteenth-century cultural de
velopm ent. Published in h onor o f the centennial o f th e Battle of Pichincha, this
vo lu m e recounted the celebratory events and d ocu m en ted the beautification
m easures pursued by the Ju n ta d el Centenario, an independent committee that
B arrera le d .43 He also included a n extended ru m in atio n on the artistic glory of
Hispanismo / 73
the city’s colonial m o n u m en ts— the churches an d p alaces that Barrera claim ed
o v e r s h a d o w e d its m od ern façade. Perhaps the m o st ardent H ispanophile w as Ji-
Fig- 3 .1. T he fa ç ad e o f S an Francisco in Q uito a llu d e s to th e towers o f Sp ain ’s P atio de los Reyes
at El Escorial. C o u rte s y L ib ra ry o f Congress, P rin ts & Photographs D ivision, lo t 2779.
Fig 3.2. In addition to the b ell tow ers, elem ents from the en try w ay o f the western façade o f the
royal monastery o f El Escorial in S p a in , shown here, appear in Q u ito ’s San Francisco. C ourtesy
Library o f Congress, Prints & P hotograph s Division, lot 7736.
Legend, which originated in th e work o f Las Casas and concerned the m erciless
Iberian conquistadors. T h e D om inican fria r’s castigatio n s had long inspired
Anglo-Saxon antipathy to S p a in while Spanish A m e ric a n intellectuals saw
Las Casas as an early ad vocate o f im perial reform . H owever, as C hristopher
Schmidt-Nowara has dem onstrated, figures like C u b an José Antonio Saco and
Honduran Carlos G utiérrez referenced Las C asas not on ly to dem and social
reforms but also to assert th e generosity o f a Spanish civilizin g m ission based
on conversion and fratern ity between Spain and the A m ericas. While jingoistic
nationalists continued to v iew Las Casas as a traitor, som e intellectuals such
as conservative Antonio M a ría Fabé and M adrid philosopher Em ilio C astelar
began to propose a co u n tervailin g “ White Legend” alon g these lines.51 M enén-
dez Pelayo helped p op u larize this approach, which b egan to grow increasingly
bellicose after 1898. T h is version o f the argum ent was m ost succinctly expressed
in Julián Juderías y Lo yo t’s 19 14 work, Leyenda negra y ¡a verdad histórica, w hich
held that Spain’s devotion to religion and art m ade it the greatest civilizing force
the world had ever know n.
Navarro embraced th is strid ent version o f the W hite Legend and elevated
Quito as a symbolic p illar o f the defense. For exam ple, he delivered a speech in
1929 suggesting that Q uito, w ith its “splendid ed ifices, convents and churches
of rare m agnificence, p a in tin g s and statues, form id ab le am ounts o f civil and
religious furnishings, jew els w ith delicate silverw ork, etc. . . . was a m ute w it
ness advocating [in S p a in ’s d efense].”52 The follow in g year he extended this
76 \ Hispanismo
Travelers w h o visit Quito today d u rin g the m onth o f D ecem ber can e x p e ri
ence the elaborate festivities held to celebrate the city's fou nd in g. W in e, beer,
and aguardiente flow in abundance as revelers in Spanish costu m e g a ily cavort
across the city in open-air buses called chivas w hile singing th e c ity ’s anthem s.
Until b u llfigh tin g’s abolition this year, m atad o rs from across the w orld w ould
descend on the capital for a w eeklong series o f corridas, where th e y were m et
b y performative protests by defenders o f a n im a l and indigenous righ ts seeking
VA Xl( IIV'I.
o r g a .n o
Fig* 3-3- Cover, Gaceta M unicipal 19:77 (August 2 8 ,19 3 4 ). C ou rtesy A rchivo H istórico M etropoli
tano, Quito.
friar, and a design contest to produce colo n ial architecture “using m odern c o n
struction techniques.”6’
Perhaps the m ost im pressive element o f the centennial, however, concerned
the sheer am ount o f m aterial published to com m em orate the an n iversary .
It ranged from special issues o f literary jo u rn a ls to the six-section edition o f
the Quito daily, El Comercio, to collections o f historical essays b y schoolchil
dren. The m u n icip ality, however, ou tp aced th e others in its celebratory zeal.
8o \ Hispanismo
For exam ple, it in itiated a series o f reprints o f h isto ric docum ents th a t contin
ues today. The first fo u r volum es appeared in 1934 and reproduced th e “ Libro
Verde,” which con tain ed the earliest records o f th e city cabildo.64 Besides these
collectors’ item s, th e Gaceta Municipal p rin ted com m em orative ed ition s for the
A ugust and D ecem ber anniversaries in w h ich th e H ispanist bias o f th e m unici
p al council, th en led b y Jijón, can be e asily n o ted . The cover o f b o th editions
for instance, replaced the m agazine’s earlier m in im a list form at w ith a baroque
design, fram ed b y an ornate border, w ith th e c ity ’s coat o f arm s su rrou n d ed by
inset portraits o f A lm a g ro and B enalcázar. A n im age o f Francisco P izarro at
the bottom edge com pletes this tribute to Q u ito ’s Spanish heritage, w hich was
retained over the n ext tw o decades before th e m u n icip ality suspended publica
tion o f the gazette altogether (fig. 3.3). T h e con ten t o f the two vo lu m es, one for
the August a n n iv ersa ry and one for the D ecem b er anniversary, also exhibits a
strong desire to id e n tify the city with its S p a n ish heritage.
The A ugust issu e focuses exclusively on th e c ity ’s colonial p ast.65 It includes
essays on Jodoco R ick e, the first m inutes recorded b y the colonial cabild o, and
González Suárez’s account o f his research trip to Seville. T ributes to th e con
quistadors b y p ro m in en t intellectuals su ch as literary h istorian Isaac Barrera,
the conservative essayist Rem igio Crespo T o ral, and the director o f th e National
Library, Zo ila U garte de Landivar, round ou t th e volum e.
The illustrations and photographs in clu d ed throughout con firm the empha
sis on the c ity’s colo n ial m onum ents and S p a n ish heritage.66 A p ic to ria l essay
on San Francisco b e g in s w ith a rep rod u ction o f a 1785 p aintin g d ep ictin g the
c ity ’s first F ran cisc a n fria r, Jodoco R ick e, b a p tiz in g an indigenous fa m ily in
an evocative reference to N avarro’s ad vocacy o f th e W hite Legend. Portraits of
the church’s celebrated architecture follow , in clu d in g both a street-level image
o f the oft-photographed m ain façade and a som ew hat more u n u su a l overhead
shot o f the c irc u la r stairw ell o ff the p laza. T h e n ext im age, w hich d ep icts the
yet-to-be-erected statu e o f González S u árez, fu rth e rs the square’s identification
with the heroism o f the city’s H ispanist in telligen tsia. Sim ilar spotlights on the
architecture o f th e nearby churches o f L a M erced and Santo D o m in go come
next. The photographs conclude with p o rtra its o f the m onarchs who ru led from
Iberia during Q u ito’s colonial era, from C h a rle s V to Ferdinand V I I .67
While the Gaceta Municipal from A u g u s t 1934 em phasized the colo n ial era,
the December issue attem pted to draw a brid ge between that past an d the mod
ern present. T h is e ffo rt began with the in tro d u cto ry rem arks, in w h ich the editor
notes his intention to evaluate whether th e c ity h a d advanced fa r enou gh over
its four hundred years. The issue includes a m u ltitu d e o f essays, photographs,
paintings, and oth er item s that attem pt to referen ce the past bu t a lso elevate
the present. The ju xtap o sition can seem stran ge, such as the in terru p tion o f an
essay about the fa m o u s colonial painter M ig u e l de Santiago w ith photographs
o f recently erected w orker housing in th e B a rrio Obrero, on the so u th ern edge
Hispanism o / 81
Despite the m erits o f h is analysis, Bustos m ista k en ly argues that the celebra
tion s o f 1934 represented a n isolated com m em oration w ith m inim al connection
to contem porary celebrations o f Decem ber 6.73 O ver the next two decades, the
H isp a n ist m em bership o f th e N ational A cadem y o f H isto ry and the conserva
tive leadership o f the m u n ic ip a lity system atically cod ified their interpretation
o f th e c ity ’s role as the rep o sito ry o f the Spanish center o f national identity even
as th e celebrations d ro p p e d fro m the pu blic con scio usn ess. T h is system atic
e ffo rt started in the late 19 30 s as the council b e g a n to hold an an n u al “sesión
solemne" to com m em orate th e founding. The c u lt to B enalcázar’s m em ory ac
com pan ied this ritu al, b e g in n in g with Jijón’s p u blicatio n o f the first volum e of
h is exhaustive (and u n fin ish ed ) biography in 1936.74 In Novem ber 1942, the city
in au g u rated a special d ecoration nam ed the O rden de H onor de Caballeros de
Q u ito Sebastián de B en alcázar, which was given a n n u a lly to citizens who had
contributed in an o u tstan d in g m anner to the c ity ’s developm ent in the previous
year.75 In 1949, the city u n ve ile d a statue in B en a lc á za r’s likeness in front o f an
eighteenth-century n eoclassical structure bu ilt on the site where the conquista
d o r’s ow n house had once sto o d , w ith the jo u rn a list, diplom at, and hispanista
G o n z alo Zaldum bide presen tin g the introductory rem arks at the unveiling.76 In
subseq uent years, th is so -c a lle d C asa de B en alcázar w ould becom e a p ilg rim
age site for local H isp a n ists, and today it houses th e In stituto E cu atoriana de
C u ltu ra H ispánica as w ell as a m useum o f c o lo n ia l sculpture.77 By 1959, the
identification o f Q uito w ith th is recently invented h o lid ay had become so strong
th a t the afternoon n ew sp ap er Últimas Noticias p u b lish ed a call for the entire
c ity to celebrate the a n n iv e rsa ry , which it d id , w ith riotou s m errym ak in g in
th e streets.78 The p o p u lar celebrations that ensu ed never abandoned the stately
em brace o f a H ispanic sen sib ility, as evidenced b y the yearly bullfights, Iberian
garb , and political strife th a t continue to m ark the holiday in its present form .
T h e vision o f Q u ito’s centro as a livin g m u se u m prom ulgated by N avarro,
Jijó n , and others garn ered exten sive in stitu tio n al su p p ort. The postcards d is
c u sse d in chapter 1 an d m ap s from chapter 2 represent some o f the earliest ef
fo rts b y the national g o vern m en t to apply this id ea b u t certain ly not the last,
as th e m ovem ent to p rom ote the city’s tourist p oten tial continued. By 1938, the
fo reig n press had so in te rn a liz e d Q uito’s S p a n ish identity that the New York
World-Telegram presented a photograph o f the P laza de la Independencia h igh
ligh tin g the cathedral (fig. 3.4), w ith San Fran cisco’s towers in the background,
a n d an accom panying cap tion encouraging A m e rican tourists to experience this
“c o lo rfu l” city where “ th e cam era virtu ally shows a bit o f Spain transplanted in
Q u ito .”79 Two years later, th e priests o f San Fran cisco emerged from the cloister
H ispanism o / 83
Fig. 3.4. “ Bit o f Sp ain in South A m erica," New York World Telegram. C o u rtesy Library o f C on
gress, Prints & Photographs D ivision, N Y W T S
In September 1895, the d ay a fter his victorious e n try into Q uito, the new p resi
dent, Eloy A lfaro, pen n ed a letter to Carlos Freile, th e new ly appointed govern or
of Pichincha, bem oaning the capital’s lack o f b asic services. Bristlin g at the c ity ’s
underdevelopment, he declared his im m ediate inten tion to authorize up to fifty
thousand sucres for the construction o f a cen tral m arket. T he Viejo L u ch ad o r
also pledged future fu n d in g for other badly need ed public works, argu in g th at
“ this capital has been q uite bad ly m aintain ed.” ' T h e bluster o f this c o m m u n i
qué, intended to d iscredit the Progressive go vern m en ts o f the previous decade,
obscured A lfaro’s e q u a lly im portant com m itm ent to b u ild in g an allian ce w ith
the municipal council. Each prom ised reform h a d been requested yearly b y the
city council during the previous decade on ly to b e refu sed by a state b ereft o f
funds. In offering to su p p o rt the realization o f th ese reform s, A lfa ro h op ed to
establish a loyal follow in g am ong m em bers o f th e local governm ent o f a c ity
long known as a conservative bastion.
The cabildo benefited from the patronage o f th e Liberal state, but th is a lli
ance did not last. The pressures and potential p ro fits occasioned b y the ca p ita l’s
growing population, exp an d in g real estate m ark e t, and developing sociospatial
85
k
86 \ Governance and the Sovereign C abildo
cessitated the negotiation o f an identity and politics com m ensurate with Q uito’s
simultaneous status as “c a p ita l” and “second city.” In th is regard, Quito ought
to be considered a relatively u n iqu e specimen am ong Latin A m erican capitals.
Unlike Mexico City, B u en o s A ires, or Lim a, the E cu ad o rian m etropolis never
had hegemonic prim acy. In d eed , its particular b ra n d o f tradable historicity can
be more fruitfully com pared to the positioning com m on to secondary centers
whose economic and p o litic a l im port has largely fad e d , for exam ple, Cuzco or
Oaxaca.4 These cities, h ow ever, never experienced the sim ultaneous responsi
bilities and opportunities th a t accompanied the status o f national capital, w hich
provided greater state im p e tu s for sustaining local developm ent.
Several factors affected the success o f this b alan cin g act, including the rela
tionship between the c ity a n d national governm ents, access to and control over
planning funds, and, p erh ap s m ost im portantly, the ab ility to articulate the m u
nicipal council’s dual n atu re as a bastion o f both m od ern ity and heritage. These
three factors had a collective im pact on the process o f urban planning du ring
three distinctive epochs. D u rin g the late nineteenth century, Progressive local
governments strained a g a in st both state-im posed b u d getary lim its as well as an
internal ambivalence as to th e value o f “progress” in the isolated Andean polis.
A fter 1895, the Liberal R evolu tio n ’s sustained m odernization program affected
the relationship between c ity and state. Despite the great advances fostered b y
collaboration between th e tw o levels o f governm ent, the state utilized public
works to accentuate its o w n prestige at the expense o f urban autonomy. B y the
late 1910s, this nepotistic system had bankrupted the city council and led to the
inauguration o f an in d ep en d en t but congressionally brokered planning com
mission that crippled u rb a n self-governance. D u rin g the late 1920s and 1930s, a
moment in which a w eak n ation al government suffered from the ill effects o f the
Great Depression, m u n icip a l governm ents sought to restore their control over
planning. This struggle cam e to fruition under a series o f activist m unicipali
ties dominated by a resu rgen t Conservative P arty th at deployed a selective re-
imagining o f the city’s colo n ial history and fom ented fears o f unregulated real
estate speculation to ju s t if y a paternalist reorganization o f urban space u nd er
their control. The cro w n in g event in this program , the adoption of Jones O drio-
zola’s master plan in 19 42, codified a new sociospatial and political order in the
city that would dom inate Q u ito’s subsequent tw entieth-century story.
The empire that S p a in b u ilt in the A m ericas lin k ed a series o f urban out
posts ruling over vast ru r a l holdings, the su rv iv a l o f which depended on the
stability o f the m un icip al governm ent, or cabildo. T he conquistadors were the
initial members o f the cab ild o, but m em bership soon expanded to include m a
jor landowners and entrepreneu rs. Cabildos th us fu nctioned as key cogs in the
88 \ Governance and the Sovereign Cabildo
b u ild in g an d passed on the requ est for congressional app ro val. T he legislature,
how ever, balked at the expropriation o f the lots su rroun d in g th e tin y square, de
layin g approval for two years u n til the m unicipality was ch arged w ith raising the
n ecessary m onies.15 Given its in a b ility to levy a direct ta x o r sell unwanted prop
erty, th e coun cil had few options oth er than taxing the ven d o rs who regularly
gath ered before the San Fran cisco church, a m easure th a t h a d first been raised
in 1887 b u t abandoned because th e lack o f fixed stalls in the m arket would make
regu latio n d ifficu lt.16 The idea gathered renewed traction follow in g congressio
n al ap p ro val o f the m arket in 1890, eventually resulting in a m odified proposal
that respond ed to the problem o f im plem entation. The new m easure called for
b u ild in g a series o f kiosks to house th e larger m erchants in th e inform al markets
fo u n d in Plaza Bolivar (a new n am e fo r the plaza in fron t o f S an Francisco) and
P laza M ejia on the eastern edge o f tow n. These would b e rented out for up to a
tw o -year period w ith the p o ssib ility for fu ture renewal, w ith the proceeds ear
m ark e d toward the eventual p u rch ase o f the private hom es su rrou nd ing Santa
C la ra .17 Vendors, however, b a lk e d at occupying these k io sk s, w hich ultim ately
led th e m u n icip a lity to attem p t to entice them to agree to perm anent stalls
b y o ffe rin g a m onth free o f ren t an d taxes.'8 Once th ey b e g a n to be occupied,
fu rth e r conflicts arose in 1894, w hen a local meat m erchant tried to bypass the
m u n ic ip a lity b y building his ow n k iosk , arguing that he w as th u s exem pt from
rents o r taxes. The city m agistrate w anted the rest o f the co u n cil to declare this
k io sk a th reat to public hygiene, b u t the group’s w o rry th a t th is w ould neces
sitate o u tlaw in g all meat sales in public plazas led th em to reject h is petition.19
S u b a lte rn resistance to these effo rts to restructure com m ercial space also
took ad van tage o f traditional conceptions o f social an d sp a tia l order designed
to a p p e a l to conservatives on th e cou n cil. A clear e xam p le o f th is process can
be seen in an 1892 case involving soap m akers from the low -incom e San Roque
neigh borh ood on the southw estern edge o f the city. W om en d om inated the field,
c o o k in g the rank m ixture on the patios o f their houses. S o o n a fter the m unici
p a lity p assed a law relegating th e in d u stry (and the sm ell) to the outskirts of
to w n , a num ber o f San Roque jaboneras sent a firm re fu sa l to obey an ordinance
they considered tantam ount to the destruction o f their livelih o od . They couched
th eir cla im in both spatial and h isto rical term s. A lleg in g th a t the industry had
been critica l to the local econom y since the days o f Q ueen Isabella o f Spain, they
cited tw o objections to the p roposed transfer. First, th ey argu ed that the law did
not exp ressly call fo r the rem oval o f all soap m an u facto ries b u t only for those
w i t h i n th e recinto (enclosure) o f th e city, w hich they d e fin e d as m eaning “ the
c ity cen te r itself.” Since San R o q u e lay on the sou th w estern edge o f the city,
th ey a rg u e d that m oving the w orksh op s was u n n ecessary. Second, they cited
the e x trem e difficulty o f tran sp o rtin g their operations, n o tin g that their heavy
k ettles necessitated sedentary con d itions, unlike candle m an u fa ctu re.20
T h e m unicip ality categorically dism issed the second argu m en t proffered by
th e jaboneras as an example o f retrograde underdevelopm ent. T h e precise spatial
Governance and the Sovereign C abildo / 91
Francisco Andrade M arin-— a prom inent law yer a n d moderate liberal w h o had
challenged the cou n cil’s leth argy for years— C o n gress finally released the funds
in 1888, pending a d etailed study regarding im plem entation. The project proved
to be a more d ifficult ven tu re than o rigin ally exp ected as the council divided
sharply over the scale o f the tram network. A g a in , the key issue concerned the
relationship o f the c ity to its hinterland. M a n y cou n cil m em bers h op ed that
the trains would not b e lim ited to urban p arish es an d could therefore serve to
integrate commerce at th e coun ty level. T h en th e coun cil attorney, Ju lio Paz
y M iño, charged th at tra in s that traversed o n ly th e c ity ’s 174 hectares w ould
be m erely recreational vehicles, given the ease o f navigating the city on foot.
His arguments included a convoluted d iscu ssion on the etym ology o f th e word
tranvía, which he considered to m ean a road (via) th at knows no lim its (trans).
A ndrade M arin and others, however, noted th at th e original authorization had
specifically called fo r ferrocarriles urbanos, w h ich necessitated re strictin g the
trains to the country’s u rb an zone, an argum ent th at persuaded his fellow coun
cil m em bers.23
A s with other p rojects, the tram s were e v e n tu a lly cut due to fin a n cin g is
sues— one o f the reasons m an y viewed m od ern ization with disdain. T h e roots
o f this fiscal crisis lay in A nd rad e M arin’s taste fo r expensive projects as w ell as
in the ongoing national political strife. A fte r years o f challenging the co u n cil’s
lethargy, he finally succeeded in securing election on ly after offering a virtu a l
bribe in which he p rom ised to donate a parcel o f la n d he owned behind the ca
bildo headquarters to b u ild a sm all plaza. T h e active m odernization agenda
he followed led to the initiation o f tram ways, electrical lighting, and th e cattle
bypass road as well as th e cobblestone paving o f cen tral streets and substan tial
repairs on the d ecayin g aboveground sew ers.24 H owever, a sim ultaneous eco
nomic slide led to the contraction o f governm ent fu n d s, fiscal decline, an d the
coun cil’s rejection o f A n d ra d e M arin ’s bid fo r reappointm ent as p resident in
December 1889.25 The go vern m en t’s failure to rep ay a ten-thousand-sucre ad
vance that had been u sed to suppress an in su rrectio n the year before aggravated
the crisis and led to th e revocation o f alm ost eigh t thousand sucres’ w o rth of
expenditures budgeted fo r the marketplace, tra m s, debts, and public ligh tin g.26
A gain, the coun cil responded to this fu rth e r erosion o f its p la n n in g pre
rogatives with com p rom ise m easures, w hich can b e seen m ost clearly in the
drawn-out saga to im prove nocturnal lighting. B o th the council and th e C o n
gress viewed the city’s continued use o f candlelight as unbefitting a nineteenth-
century capital and th u s authorized an illu m in a tio n property tax in 1883, with
lots levied at on e-th ou san d th their value. T h is le v y (unsurprisingly) proved
insufficient to raise the fu n d s necessary to in stall th e centralized gas or electric
system the m unicipality h ad in m ind. Fu rth erm ore, Congress granted exclusive
development rights to th e expensive V in u esa-O n tan ed a firm , thus exclu d in g
bidders from less costly ou tfits.27 A n interim solu tio n suggested by local entre
preneur Pedro M anuel Pérez Quiñonez and su p p o rted vocally by council m em
Governance and the Sovereign Cabildo / 93
tion o f the lightbulb in 1879 a n d th e opening o f the first cen tral pow er stations
in London and New York in 1882 inspired m any coun cil m em bers.30 The m ost
aggressive push cam e in late 1888, w hen a com m ission h ead ed b y then—vice
president Andrade M arin serio u sly reviewed V in u esa-O n tan ed a’s proposal for
illum inating the blocks su rro u n d in g the Plaza de la In dependencia w ith twenty-
two electric bulbs. The com m issio n ’s report, which recom m end ed adopting the
measure in order to bring Q u ito to the forefront o f global technological m oder
nity, sparked a tense d iscu ssio n . D u rin g the debate, A n d ra d e M a rin squared
off with Narváez, who interrogated the u tility o f the new tech nology given that
not even Paris had adopted electric lighting. A s he pu t it, “ O u r tow n is poor and
does not need to be bothered b y su ch lu xu riou s con tribu tion s. Later, when the
invention is perfected, it w ill co m e to ou r land on its o w n , w ith ou t ou r h aving
to th ru st ourselves into co n je ctu re s.” 3"
N arváez’s call for p atience an d opposition to ad o p tin g an as yet untested
technology articulated a w id esp read concern am ong m em bers o f not only the
council but also the legislature. G iven the city and state’s lim ited m eans, w hat
was the h arm in waiting u n til m ore am bitious cities abro ad h ad perfected the
new invention? A ndrade M a r in ’s enthusiasm could n ot overcom e this p rag
matic objection— so he backed d ow n . However, he attem pted to save face before
agreeing to the proposed alte rn a tive — m ore Dietz lam p s-—b y noting that the
number o f bulbs from the V in uesa-O ntaned a proposal w o u ld not allow for the
city wide illum ination that he h op ed Q uito would soon enjoy.32
The institution o f k erosen e ligh tin g, while fo re sta llin g electricity, h ad a
broader impact due to a su b seq u en t challenge to congressional control over u r
ban taxation policies, perhaps th e greatest lim itation on an y m odernization p ro
gram. Instead o f retaining the fla t tax on property slated fo r illu m ination, the
m unicipality had long ad vocated a variable levy based on th e length o f a b u ild
ing s street frontage. Follow in g the city’s refusal to p ay b ack its ten-thousand-
sucre loan in 1889, Congress offered an olive branch b y agreeing in principle to
this m easure. It took another tw o years o f frequent h a ra n g u in g and the return
o f Andrade M arfn to the co u n cil presidency for this ch ange to be im plem ented.
Nevertheless, the ensuing system dem onstrated an increasing sense o f the u til
94 \ Governance and the Sovereign Cabildo
ity o f urban security an d th e need for the local a n d national public to share the
fin a n cia l burden o f m o d e rn iz in g the capital.
However, this new ta x system also revealed th e continuation o f the trad i
tio n a l radial construction o f social power. U nlike the m easure to eradicate soap
m an u factu re, the duties th at p aid for public ligh tin g were set on a sliding scale,
w ith the highest levels (eight centavos per meter) in th e eight blocks surrounding
th e Plaza Grande and th e low est (two centavos) o n th e ou tskirts o f tow n.33 The
proceeds went to p u rch asin g ever m ore Dietz la m p s, the placem ent o f w hich ra
d iated outward from the cen tral plaza. Finally, in 1894, the council could boast
th a t the entire city’s d im can d leligh t had been rep laced w ith a warm kerosene
glow .34
T he process o f im p le m en tin g the new lig h tin g system dem onstrated the
ob stacles that needed to be overcom e to achieve su stain ed progress in an era
o f bud getary constraints. T h e biggest barrier con cern ed the lim its set fo rth by
th e central governm ent, b u t e q u ally im portant w as th e am bivalence regarding
m o d ern ization itself. A lth o u g h im provisation a n d com prom ise allow ed for
som e advances, m ajor p rog ram m atic alterations sta lle d without state support.
T h is dynam ic sh ifted w ith th e advent o f the 1895 L iberal Revolution b u t was
n ot fun d am en tally tra n sfo rm e d . T he increased su p p o rt for local developm ent
projects initiated b y E loy A lfa ro an d Leonidas P la z a allow ed for the realization
o f m ajor projects th at h a d been considered, d eb ated , and quashed d u rin g the
Progressive era. H owever, th e m u nicipality co n tin u ed to depend on the central
governm ent, w ith m ajor ad vances only o ccu rrin g d u rin g m om ents o f height
en ed state concern ab ou t th e shape o f the n a tio n a l cap ital. T h is included the
im m ed iate afterm ath o f the 1895 revolution, w h en th e new governm ent sought
to legitim ate its auth ority, as w ell as during th e 19 09 and 1922 celebrations o f
th e centennials o f the d eclaration o f independence an d liberation from Spain,
respectively.
Liberal Spending
ort for local autonomy. Rather, the Liberal era perpetuated political partisan
s h ip e v e n as Liberals sought to d istu rb the historic regional bases o f the C on
s e r v a t i v e and Progressive parties. A s K im Clark has noted, new initiatives such
as t h e national railroad were p roclaim ed as redemptive w orks th at would rescue
t h e nation from decades o f stagnation , corruption, and inefficiency.36 The city
g o v e r n m e n t w holeheartedly em braced its role in this stru g g le , adopting the
m o t t o “Querer es poder" (Desire enables).37 W hile it would tak e longer for major
reforms such as the building o f the m arketplace, the new cabild o rapidly com
p le t e d a series o f sym bolic gestures underscoring its com m itm en t to progress
and the transform ation o f society. One o f the first actions w as the relaunch
ing o f El Municipio, the co u n cil’s w eekly that had been in terru p ted during the
battles o f 1895- A num ber o f changes to the publication p roclaim ed a symbolic
s h i f t , including a banner read in g “ Nueva Era” that appeared beneath the title,
the addition o f page num bers, and the resetting o f issue n u m b ers.38 Another act
concerned new landscaping fo r the dam aged gardens o f the Plaza de la Indepen
dencia, which a local newspaper h ad term ed “un potrero gratis" (a free horse pas
ture).39 The council also encouraged private citizens to actively engage the new
era through in-kind donations to rebuild civil society, an im provised measure
calculated to spur support fo r the new government. Those w ho did so included
form er council engineer and cartographer Gualberto Pérez, who completed his
embellishment o f the Plaza Sucre, begun in 1893, f ° r free, and local elite Juana
Naranjo, who donated extra p ipin g to carry water from A la m e d a P ark’s foun
tain to homes nearby.40
The new cabildo also sought to m atch its rhetoric w ith m ore substantive re
form s, particularly with regard to m odernizing the city’s in frastru ctu re. These
program s largely echoed the desires o f m unicipal governm en ts controlled by
the Progressive Party in the 1880s— after all, the city’s needs h ad not changed.
Not surprisingly, given A lfa ro ’s early endorsement o f the proposed marketplace
structure, the council began w ith that long-desired project. T h e first step in
volved securing an additional hundred-thousand-sucre loan to match A lfaro’s
pledge and to fund a second m arket on the city’s north sid e.4* Advertisem ents
calling for designs appeared in El Municipio beginning in late 1895, and a special
com m ission began reviewing the proposals the following A p r il.42 By September,
the fin alists had been selected and presented to President A lfa ro , who worked
with the com m ission to select the design presented by a recen tly arrived Ger
m an ém igré nam ed Francisco Sch m idt. Sch m idt’s attractiveness as a candidate
stem m ed from not only h is im peccable credentials but also h is recent partner
ship w ith Gualberto Pérez, w hose pro bono labor on the P laza Sucre was fresh
in the m inds o f the council m em bers.43 The loans were approved in February, a
contract w ith Schmidt and Pérez signed in A pril, and b y M a y 2 ,18 9 7, construc
tion had finally began on a project first approved fourteen years earlier.
T h e new cabildo m eant fo r the proposed structure to be quite imposing. Its
outer m asonry walls took up an entire city block and su pported a vaulted glass-
96 \ Governance and the Sovereign Cabildo
pavem ent in the central p arts o f the city by 1919. Both the drainage and p av in g
projects were com pleted b y 1922.46
The im provem ents in urban in frastru ctu re altered the pace o f quiteno life ,
a ffo r d e d the possibility fo r growing suburbanization, and form alized system s o f
public commerce by elim in atin g the need fo r c a su a l m arkets and water ca rriers.
These changes have led num erous analysts to con sider the Liberal R evolu tio n a
transformative m om ent in the city’s history. T h is an alysis, however, d ow n plays
the continuity betw een the alterations o f this era and the intentions o f th e P ro
g r e s s iv e m unicipalities o f the 1880s and 18 90 s. S eve ra l m ajor players fro m th e
P ro g r e s s iv e period, in d eed , returned to service soon a fter the revolutionary tr i
umph. These included staunch m odernizers lik e A n d rad e M arin , who retu rn ed
to his ro le as m u n icip al attorney in early 1896 an d later reclaim ed the co u n cil
presidency, as well as m ore cautious bureaucrats, such as Juan Jose N arvaez and
Domingo Gangotena.
The stability in cou n cil m em bership across tim e paralleled continuity in so-
ciospatial outlook, at least through 1910. A s in p revio u s decades, poorer regions
of the urban p eriphery, such as El Tejar, on th e u p p er slopes o f P ich in ch a, the
mostly indigenous settlem ents south o f the Q u eb rad a Jerusalen, an d th e s till
developing m ixed-incom e housing east o f San to D om ingo, received scan t atten
tion. Instead, m od ern izin g reform s tended to b e restricted to central streets and
plazas along the trad ition al centers o f power. For instan ce, an 1897 law re q u irin g
the installation o f g u tters was restricted to th e forty-tw o blocks su rro u n d in g
the Plaza de la In dependencia, a zone d em arcatin g the old colonial c ity center
of churches and elite residences, and to a single a rtery leading northw ard fro m
the Sucre Theater alon g Carrera Guayaquil th a t presaged subsequent su b u rb an
development along the sam e route.47 Projects u n d ertak en by the m u n ic ip a lity ’s
briqada ambulante, or m obile workers, paved th o se sam e areas with cobblestone
and instituted a cen tralized street-sweeping p ro g ram fun d ed with a ta x sim ila r
to the street frontage le v y used for kerosene ligh tin g a decade earlier.48 T h e sam e
rationale lay behind th e m ap o f the electric arc ligh tin g instituted in 19 0 0 —19 0 1,
which divided the city into four sections, each ch arged according to its p ro x im
ity to the Plaza de la Independencia.49
Nevertheless, the grow ing population in th e c ity ’s environs m ade a s h ift in
administrative ord er necessary. O f p a rtic u la r im po rtan ce were the e m e rgin g
suburbs along C arrera G uayaquil to the n orth a n d near the Recoleta, th e fo rm er
horse pasture affixed to a solitary convent on th e c ity ’s southeast. T hese valu ab le
Belle Epoque chalets on the city’s outskirts necessitated a sh ift from th e rad ial
orientation o f urb an services and property ta x codes. The possibility o f m a k in g
this change was first raised in 1904 in a short-lived contract with local d eveloper
Luis Felipe Carbo to b u ild urban trams. A lth o u g h the agreement fell a p a rt the
following year because C arbo had underestim ated the costs, the cou n cil fo r the
first time agreed th at an y urban system w o u ld be incom plete w ithout p u sh in g
98 \ Governance and the Sovereign Cabildo
into the osten sibly ru ral parishes o f C h im b acalle on the south and S an ta Prisca
to the north, w here m uch o f the new c o n stru ctio n was located.50 T h e advent of
Ciudadela L a rre a , the first planned c o m m u n ity erected in Santa P risc a , intensi
fied debates abou t extending m odern services to the parish. In 19 0 6 , as a result
o f these d iscu ssio n s, the parish was ch osen to receive can alization fo r potable
water along w ith th e rest o f the urban g rid .5'
The southern environs o f the city b egan to receive greater state a n d m unici
pal attention aro u n d the same tim e, largely becau se o f outbreaks o f typh oid fe
ver and bubonic plagu e in isolated pockets on the coast. The cou n cil authorized
several m easures designed to m inim ize sa n ita ry risks, including con tin u ed at
tem pts to restrict com m ercial ventures, su ch as outlawing m ilk ve n d in g in the
central d istricts. A num ber o f these efforts, inclu d in g a move to d ep u tize the po
lice as a tem p o rary street-sweeping force, targeted im poverished neighborhoods
on the south side.52 T h e m ost im portant issu e, however, concerned the fate o f the
Quebrada Je ru salen , the last o f the creeks th at had once crisscrossed the Quito
valley. Its deep ravin e ran along the P an ecillo and had for centuries d ivid ed the
indigenous to w n sh ip s o f La M agd alena a n d C h im bacalle fro m th e southern
reaches o f th e c ity and had also served as an in form al d u m p in g gro u n d . For
the health-conscious council, the gorge th u s represented a cesspool o f stagnant
water, refuse, an d excrem ent that desperately needed clearing.55
However, as w ith other public service ventures o f the early tw entieth century,
the successful d ra in in g o f the Q uebrada Je ru sa len depended on th e w h im s of
the national governm ent. The state h a d m an d ated the need to p rovid e a drain
age canal as early as 1899 as part o f its p rogram to beautify Q uito, d o in g so upon
the recom m en dation o f m unicipal h ealth inspectors. C ontinu ed conservative
uprisings in 19 0 0 as well as a split betw een A lfa ro and his successor, Leonidas
Plaza, delayed th e securing o f con gressional fu n d in g until 19 02. D espite Presi
dent Plaza’s strong backing, it took three m ore years for the fu n d s to be freed.
The ap p ro val o f fu n d in g in 1905 stem m ed p artly from th e sta te ’s preoc
cupation w ith the plague scare along w ith the continual a d vo ca cy .o f Francisco
A ndrade M a rin , who had returned to th e council presidency th e p revio u s year.
W hile strongly prom oting the im portance o f the work due to p u b lic h ealth con
cerns, A n d rad e M a rin also stressed its im plications for the c ity ’s m odernization
agenda and th e potential benefits for sec u rin g foreign investm ent in the capital.
He diverted fu n d s earm arked for o th er projects toward the c a n a l’s com ple
tion, such as m on ies rem aining a fter th e com pletion o f the rin g road bypass
for cattle b o u n d fo r the slaughterhouse.54 H is energetic supp ort fo r th e project
continued a fte r h is appointm ent as in sp ecto r general o f h ealth a n d hygiene in
1908, the sam e year in which the plagu e spread to Guayaquil a n d A la u s i, a criti
cal transfer p o in t on the nearly com pleted G uayaquil-Q uito railw ay.55 Besides
m aking progress on Jerusalen drainage, A n d rad e M arin took a d van tage o f the
public h ealth fears to conclude a series o f other sanitary ad van ces, including
the o rgan ization o f wastewater collectio n in the centro, p avin g th e centro with
Governance and the Sovereign Cabildo / 99
Salesian priest named Juan B au tista M inghetti, who h ad d rafted it for the Pro
gressive governm ent prior to leavin g for exile in 1895, an d D u rin i m odified that
design on ly slightly. N evertheless, its execution u nd erscored the Liberal ability
to efficiently complete projects where others had failed (thus echoing their cho
sen m otto , “Querer es poder”).
T h is m onum ental sem io lo gy, in which Liberal p ro g re ss contrasted w ith
sta g n a n t (Conservative) co lo n iality, also influenced th e decision to locate the
Exposición Nacional in the R ecoleta. Although the sq u are lay at the center o f a
developing modern neighborhood and near the C h im b acalle station, it had pre
v io u sly housed the D om inican ord er’s stables. The state’s transform ation o f the
old potrero into a finely lan d scap ed park was a triu m ph o f Liberal antielerical-
ism , fu rth e r underscored b y th e renam ing o f the square as Parque R ocafuerte,
a fte r th e first great hero o f nin eteenth-century E c u a d o ria n liberalism . The
lan d scap in g began with the su rro u n d in g streets, w hich w ere leveled and paved
to provid e easy access for the n ation al and foreign notables attending the exposi
tion. T h ese dignitaries w ould reach the pavilions b y stro llin g through sculpted
gard en s, one o f which featu red an artificial w aterfall. T h e largest pavilion was
the P alace o f the E xpo sition , w h ich housed the E c u a d o ria n , Peru vian , and
French exhibits. Fram ing the sou th ern entry to the p a r k , th e palace was an elon
gated neoclassical structure w ith two wings and, risin g in the m iddle, a dom ed
tower th at featured a patriotic icon at its pinnacle— th e fly in g condor from the
n ation al coat o f arms. To th e n o rth and east o f the p alace were pavilions erected
b y oth er nations, including th e U nited States, C h ile, Ja p a n , Spain , Colom bia,
and Italy. The governm ent a lso constructed a fine a rts p av ilio n , a m usic kiosk,
and a concert café. The last piece w as one o f the h igh lig h ts o f the fair because o f
its elaborate art nouveau d esig n s.6*
T h is sym bolic landscape n ot on ly cemented L ib e ra l design s on the capital
but a lso heralded a shift in the c ity ’s sociospatial order alo n g a north-south axis.
For exam ple, a January 1910 ord inance that reorganized street cleaning proce
d ures d ivided the city into tw o adm inistrative zones fo r th e first tim e, one for
the north ern h a lf and one fo r thé south.6* A num ber o f decisions to incorporate
the im m ediate environs into the u rb an Jurisdiction follow ed th is break from the
trad ition al radial organization o f the capital. The first o f these decisions was to
in clu d e the hitherto rural p arish es o f A lfaro (C h im b a çalle ’s new nam e, given
the fo rm er president’s en th u siasm for the railroad), L a M agd alen a, and Santa
P risca for a special tax on chicherías passed in late D ecem ber 1909.63 A more im
p o rta n t m easure followed in Ja n u a ry 1910, when the fin a l contract for tram con
stru ctio n with A m erican b u sin essm an E. Hope N o rto n called for the building
o f a cityw id e rail network th at w ould ru n from the C h im b a calle station to the
new A ven id a Colón in the h ea rt o f “ru ral” Santa P ris c a .64 Finally, in February
19 10 , the three parishes were fo rm a lly incorporated in to th e city.65 Santa Prisca’s
p eriu rb an and rural expanses, however, were reorganized as a ru ral parish, and,
Governance and the Sovereign C abildo / 101
the c ity ’s north eastern environs. Tw o years later, the A n glo -F ren ch Syndicate
and th e governm ent reached a n acco rd on the com pan y’s p la n to develop the
region ju st n orth o f the Ejido, in b etw een Avenida 18 de septiem bre and Avenida
M a ria n o A g u ile ra , to form the B a rrio del Centenario.69 U n d er the term s o f the
con tract, th e B ritish firm w o u ld n o t o n ly establish a street p attern but also be
in ch arge o f installing a w orking sew er system and p rep arin g the neighborhood
to receive e xistin g m unicipal se rv ic e s.70 These successes led the national gov
ern m en t to a m p lify the ju n ta’s p ow ers to allow it to exp ro p riate lands, dictate
re g u la tio n s concerning urb an aesth e tics, im pose fines fo r violation s o f these
rules, a n d approve plans for a n y n ew construction.7' E ach o f these had histori
cally been the responsibility o f th e m unicipality, w hich, w eakened by its fiscal
m ism an agem en t, made little fu s s over the changes.
T h e m ost impressive project com pleted b y the Ju n ta d el Centenario was the
in fillin g o f the Quebrada Je ru sa lén , w hich had continued to be used as a dum p
ing g ro u n d despite the in tro d u ctio n o f sewerage in 1908 a n d som e decorative
fa c e lifts (m ostly the addition o f n eoclassical lintels) on n earb y buildings. The
p roject in volved filling the g u lly w ith hundreds o f to n s o f d irt brought in by
tru ck , d u m p e d b y m echanical sh ovel, and spread b y m a n u a l labor— an epic
effort th at took several years to com plete. The clam orous process fascinated the
c ity ’s residents, m an y of w hom congregated to gaze at p rogress in action. On at
least one occasion, however, a n on loo ker ventured too close to one o f the mon
ster m ach in es, which accidentally d ra g g e d h im to his d eath in the depths below.
T h u s con secrated b y technology, sw eat, and blood, th e com pleted boulevard
over the once stagnant creek represented the greatest triu m p h o f local engineer
ing to th is point.
T h e new thoroughfare con sisted o f two lanes for v e h icu la r traffic interrupted
by a n e x p a n sive m edian th a t se rv e d as a prom enade. R o w s o f trees flanked
the d iv id e r, w hich led u p h ill tow ard a graceful colu m n designed b y Francisco
D u rin i a n d dedicated to the u n k n o w n heroes o f 1822. T h e statue allegorically
lin k e d th e Battle o f Pichincha to th e recent cataclysm o f W orld W ar I, which
h ad spaw n ed W estm inster A b b e y ’s “ U nknow n W arrior” m em orial in 1920 and
the A rc de Triom ph e’s fam ed “ T o m b o f the U nkn ow n S o ld ier” the following
year. It a lso dialogued w ith th e p illa r D u rin i’s fath er L o ren zo had erected in
the P la z a de la Independencia a d ecad e earlier. A s in the p rio r work, a defiant
cond or w ith wings outstretched gazed to the east tow ard a defeated foe. Rather
th a n th e im perial Spanish lio n , the vanquished in th is case was the erstwhile
creek— a hideous environm ental eyesore.
T h e m onum ents to heroic sa crifice did not end at the su m m it o f the grand
avenue b u t also m ade an ap p earan ce ju st above, at th e C im a de la Libertad on
P ich in ch a , where Sucre’s forces h a d engaged the S p a n ish a cen tury earlier. At
th is site, the ju nta erected a v a s t ob elisk , follow ing p la n s d raw n up by Sucre’s
v ic to rio u s b u t cash-bereft re g im e n t. T he m onolith fo llo w e d the nineteenth-
c e n tu ry design in m inute d e ta il, in clu d in g plaques d ed ica tin g the structure to
Governance and the Sovereign C abildo / 103
B o lív a r and to the vanquish ing troops.72 M o st conspicuously, at the base they
included a special decoration honoring C a p ta in A bdón Calderón, a hero o f lo
cal mythology. W ounded m ultiple tim es in the battle, Calderón perished days
later at the San Ju a n de Dios Hospital, possibly o f complications from dysentery.
S e r e ’s praise o f th e young officer in a letter to his grieving m other, however,
transformed the m em ory o f this fiery E c u a d o ria n patriot into the s tu ff o f leg
end Retelling h is tale h ad become a staple in Q uito’s anniversary celebrations
in the nineteenth cen tu ry and was cod ified into popular form in a ch ild ren ’s
b o o k of historical legends penned in 1906 b y Liberal Journalist M an uel J. Calle.
Calle’s m elodram atic story, in which the w o un d ed captain races ahead o f the
c h a r g i n g arm y w ith his sword clam ped firm ly in his teeth before a cannonball
takes his legs, w ould have been the best k n ow n version o f the tale in 1922, as it is
today.7’ As a sym b ol o f regional valor, C ald erón was unrivaled and thus received
his position o f honor.
The Junta del C entenarios successful rehabilitation o f the city led Congress
in October 1922 to appoint the junta m em bers to head a perm anent plann ing
commission. T h e new Ju n ta de Em bellecim ien to de Quito acted as a shadow
government. Its responsibilities consisted o f augm enting Q uito’s com m em o
rative statuary w ith a m ajor m onum ent to Sim ón Bolívar while continuing its
labors in beautification and planning. In ad ditio n to its earlier powers, the new
junta earned the right to charge a fee for app ro vin g new construction blueprints
and to levy a lim ited am ount o f ind epend ent taxes, h a lf o f w hich w ould be
turned over to the concejo for day-to-day op eration s.74 In effect, this decision
signaled the end o f the alliance between the m u nicipality and the state that had
characterized the first tw o decades o f the tw entieth century. H enceforth, the
two institutions w ould rem ain at loggerheads, w ith the council once again in
a defensive role, as it h ad been in the late nineteenth century. Som ew hat para
doxically, however, the later restoration o f m u nicip al privileges w ould com e as
a result of sustained action by those con servative and moderate reform ers who
had cut their teeth as members o f the Ju n ta del Centenario. A s m em bers o f the
establishment, figures such as Jacinto Jijón y C aam año and G ustavo M ortensen
sought to reestablish local control over Q u ito ’s development during the 1930s.
tion and the subsequent trium ph o f the 1925 Ju lia n Revolution, which brought
an end to unm itigated Liberal hegemony th ro u g h a m ilitary revolution loosely
tied to a socialist agen d a. Perhaps the m ost im p o rtan t reform ist m easu re was
the introduction o f a graduated income ta x a im ed at decreasing the pow er of
A n d ean landow ners an d coastal bankers. A s a sign o f the new g o vern m en t’s
com m itm ent to so c ia l change, salaried w o rkers w ith annual incom es under
twenty-four h undred sucres, such as day laborers, transportation w orkers, and
dom estics, were exem pt from this new t a x .75
Equally im po rtan t efforts at reform , th o u gh , were attempts to c u rta il waste
fu l governm ent sp e n d in g and trim the n u m b e r o f autonom ous p u b lic works
projects. The new governm ent identified the p o p u la r Junta de Em bellecim iento
as an example o f L ib e ra l excess and su sp en d ed its efforts in Sep tem b er 1925.
T h is move led to an u p roar in the local press b u t little else. A s early as N ovem
ber, planning fu n ctio n s such as expropriation righ ts and oversight o f construc
tion blueprints h a d b een returned to the d o m a in o f the concejo. 76 R a th e r than
an altruistic act fo r m u n icip al benefit, the s h ift, together with decrees central
izin g fundraising, ad van ced state d om ination o f the planning process. B y the
end o f the year, m u n icip a l levies on new b u ild in g s, public spectacles, billiards,
telephones, public ligh tin g, and the sale an d slau ghter o f cattle had b een eradi
cated. In their stead cam e a series o f new, c en tra lly controlled p ro p erty taxes,
registration fees (for exam ple, for autom obile registration), m u n icip al service
duties, and entertainm ent and lu xu ry ta x e s .77 In addition, the national govern
m ent prom ised to p rovid e a yearly dispersal o f fu n d s for public beautification,
which for Quito m ean t an additional one m illio n sucres per year, a su m th at the
governm ent began to distribute in 19 26 .78
Ironically, th is new regim en o f expan ded state control was put into place by
Isidro Ayora, a p rom in en t Quito physician a n d form er council president who
was nam ed acting president o f the country follow in g the restoration o f civilian
rule in February 1926.79 A native o f Loja, A yo ra first cam e to Quito in 1897, in the
wake o f the L iberal R evolution, to study m ed icin e at the university. He followed
th is program w ith ad vanced degrees fro m B e rlin and Dresden, re tu rn in g to
Quito in 1910 to h ead the state’s new m atern ity hosp ital before in au gu ratin g his
own m edical p ractice the following year. A y o ra ’s shim m ering m o d ern ist clinic
on the city’s o u tsk irts catered to the w ell-to-do and elevated his local prestige.
H is election to th e m u n icip al council in 1918 an d subsequent service paralleled
the decline o f its lo c a l control, though as c o u n cil president from 1924 to 1925
he did push th rou gh th e expansion o f d ra in a g e an d sewerage service to hith
erto m arginalized neighborhoods— progressive m easures that endeared h im to
the revolutionary ju n ta . Once in power, h e in stitu ted policies th at com bined
social liberalization (e.g., the extension o f th e fran ch ise to wom en in 1928, be
fore any other L a tin A m erican governm ent d id so) w ith centralized fiscal poli
cies. His program led to the form ation o f th e C en tral Bank on the Kem m erer
m odel, which h ad a lread y been put in place in C olom bia, and was also evident
Governance and the Sovereign Cabildo / 105
hand in its cam p aign for m u nicip al autonom y. Two events in p a rtic u la r dem
onstrate th e p a r ty ’s growing power. T h e first concerned the restrictio n s placed
on m unicip al fundraising in the 1929 legal code, which the co u n cil sidestepped
in early 1934 b y securing a loan fo r S /.32 0 ,0 0 0 from the B anco d el Pichincha.
M in d fu l o f public opinion and crip p le d b y its now chronic in stab ility, the state
turned a b lin d eye. Sim ilarly, C o n g re ss avoided a p otential co n fro n tation in
October 1935 concerning the c o u n c il’s com m itm ent to sellin g th e new houses
directly to workers. This policy c o n flicted directly with A rticle 17 o f the munici
pal code, w h ich called for city p rop erties to be sold at public au ction . A s in 1934,
the state q u ick ly approved Jijón’s requ est th at an exception be m ad e .93
The city governm ent then tu rn ed its eye squarely on the q u estion o f real es
tate developm ent in the burgeoning n o rth ern suburbs and its lu crative business
potential. T h e 1929 code had requ ired m u n icip al approval o f a n y new construc
tion in the city, but private firm s an d entrepreneurs regularly ignored this provi
sion. The c ity had attempted to en fo rce the regulations in 19 31 b y challenging
a plan th at local m ogul D am ian M ira n d a h ad drawn to co n stru ct a new neigh
borhood over the grounds o f the old Jo ck e y Club o ff A venida C o ló n , ju st a few
blocks d ow n from Jacinto Jijón’s residen ce. The council alleged th a t M iranda’s
expansive developm ent required h im to la y down urban in fra stru c tu re , such as
water pipes an d drainage canals, a n d it issued an order to th at effect. Miranda
ignored th eir order, however, and fo u g h t the case to the S u prem e C o u rt, argu
ing that th e tasks required o f h im w ere m unicipal resp o n sib ilities.94 The high
court agreed w ith this ch aracterizatio n , noting that the c ity governm ent was
not auth orized to require in d ivid u a ls to update urban in fra stru c tu re but only
to approve aboveground b lu ep rin ts.95 A lth o u gh incensed w ith a decision that
d im in ish ed the degree to which th e co u n cil could set the co u rse o f the city’s
developm ent, it was forced to com ply.96
Jijón a n d h is successors C a rlo s A n d ra d e M arin and G u s ta v o Mortensen
began a stead y cam paign to e xp an d p u b lic support for m u n icip a l control over
planning in order to combat this fo rm o f evasion by business in 1934. Mortensen,
who w as also the rector o f the U n iv ersid ad Central, organized a series o f pub
lic lectures on urban revitalization b y national and in tern atio n al experts, dis
courses re p rin ted in the Gaceta M u nicipal and El Comercio. T h e gazette also
reprinted w ell-know n treatises on p la n n in g m easures, in c lu d in g w ritings by
Peruvian architect Em ilio H arth-T erre and Chilean engineer D an iel Zam udio’s
work on m od ern urbanism .97 T h ese articles were often deployed strategically, as
in the case o f J. Benitez’s su m m ary o f zoning laws and m o d ern p lan n in g from
H aussm ann to Le Corbusier, w hich app eared in January 1938.98 T h e piece argued
that local control over urban developm ent allowed for san itary a n d harmonious
developm ent, and new council p resid en t Carlos A ndrade M a rin cited it when
he petitioned reform ist dictator G e n e ra l A lberto Enriquez in 1938 to approve a
new m aster plan to rectify the scattered nature o f the ca p ita l’s grow th over the
previous quarter-century. T his fra m e o f reference helped p ersu ad e Enriquez, as
Governance and the Sovereign Cabildo / 109
controlled local developm ent projects; however, in p ractice, the state continued
to dom inate the allocation o f fu n d in g and to d eterm in e the pace o f reform. At
m om ents o f intense interest in showcasing the cap ital, such as during the cen
ten n ials o f 1909 and 1922 or d u rin g the public health c rise s o f 1905, the national
governm ent loosened the p u rse strings for a v a riety o f m od ern izin g ventures.
O th erw ise, the m ain interest appears to have been la rg e ly in lim ited symbolic
gestures (such as the co n stru ctio n o f the indoor m arketp lace) that echoed the
d istin c t lack o f attention to in frastru ctu re that ch aracterized the nineteenth-
cen tu ry state.
T h is dynam ic sh ifted sligh tly w ith the state’s b a n k ro llin g o f the Junta del
C entenario (later the Ju n ta de Em bellecim iento de la C iudad ), which can truly
be considered Quito’s first relatively independent p la n n in g com m ission. How
ever, as noted above, this b o d y itself represented th e m o st strident government
attem pt to curtail the pow er o f city governm ent, op eratin g as a shadow cabildo
w ith the right to determ ine th e shape o f the city, p ass new legislation, and im
p ose its own taxes. It sh ou ld th us com e as little su rp rise that Isidro Ayora, for
m er council president, ra p id ly elim inated the b o d y as red u nd an t excess. But
th e new governm ent’s ad op tio n o f the 1929 m u n icip al cod e, which detailed the
specific responsibilities o f the city governm ent, u n d e rc u t its control over alter
nate policies and u ltim ately increased its dependence on state funding. When
th is budget was later erad icated , the door opened fo r th e alternative proposed
b y the Conservative-dom inated council o f 1934 an d its subsequent crusade to
restore urban autonomy.
A t this point, it b eh ooves us to recall the im p o rta n c e the Conservatives
p laced on taking control o ver the Q uito coun cil in 19 34 , particu larly the spe
cial role played by Jacinto Jijón. T h is was the first tim e Jijón stood for local of
fice, but it was not his first experience with city p la n n in g ; he had been working
w ith the Junta de E m b ellecim ien to since its in ceptio n , even acting as its head
in 1923. T h is experience d ecid ed ly influenced th e C o n servative platform and
w o uld also have attuned h im to the m obilizing p o w er o f public commemora
tio n . The subsequent p u b lic cam p aign to not o n ly erect substantive public
h o u sin g but also refram e th e city, and its cabildo, a s th e instigator o f national
identity ought to be seen as a necessary first step in a tta in in g national political
power. W hile Jijón h im se lf retreated from active p o litic a l life in the next several
years, he furthered the in tellectu al justification fo r th is conception of the capital
b y p enning the m ultivolu m e biography o f Q uito’s S p a n ish founder, Sebastián
de Benalcázar. Sim u ltaneously, figures like G u sta v o M ortensen built a bridge
between the cabildo and an educated public versed in th e virtu es o f urban plan
nin g. T h is network strengthened the city governm ent, which capitalized on the
state’s ongoing struggles to refashion Quito’s p la n n in g organization, restore its
b u d g e t, and move tow ard th e adoption o f th e Jo n es O driozola plan. These
resu lts came at the exp en se o f b oth private e n te rp rise and the national state,
w h ich had been eclipsed b y the m unicipal cou n cil as th e d riving force behind
Governance and the Sovereign C abildo / 113
Fig. 5 .1. Pasaje R o y al, Q u ito (early 1920s). C ou rtesy A rc h iv o H istórico, Banco C en tra l d el Ecuador.
plaza Grande, the heart o f th e colonial city and hom e to state and city bureau
crats Customers strolled on a m osaic constructed o f N o rth A m erican ceram ic
tile en route to the central la n d in g , which boasted gard ens, a m arble fountain,
and a kitschy m ural o f V en u s aligh tin g upon a veran d a in the Italian cou n try
side The doors nestled in th e delicate colonnades were th em selves elegant con
fections crafted from lu x u r y w ood s prepared in D u r in i’s ow n workshop and
outlined in shim m ering cop per trim . The display cases an d counters inside the
shops echoed this décor, w h ile the lighting fixtu res featu red stripped copper
reminiscent o f the Secessionist stirrings that had in vaded V ien n a, Prague, and
Turin over the previous decade. These stores boasted im po rted fashions, haber
dashery, and eyeglasses straigh t from H am burg and L on don. A fte r a busy after
noon shopping, businessm en, socialites, or dandies could relax b y sam pling the
Gallic delicacies of the Pasaje R o y al restaurant (whose m en u w as even printed in
French) or taking in an evening o f theater, dance, or cin em a at the Teatro Eden.1
Some even went so far as to relocate to the building’s spacious apartm ents on the
third floor while the city’s b est firm s rented berths dow n the hall.
One o f those com panies w as that o f the b u ild in g arch itect h im self, whose
offices overlooked V enezuela Street from the central archw ay. Like his gran di
ose structure, Francisco D u rin i Câceres profited from an au ra o f consum m ate
modernity. Along with h is fath er, Lorenzo, and brother Pedro, D u rin i built the
largest architectural concern in the capital at least p a rtia lly based upon their
ability to promote a worldly im age o f European ga lla n try coupled w ith exquisite
technical expertise. This p erso n a afforded the D u rin is th eir first com m issions;
however, the firm ’s lasting p ow er rested upon Fran cisco ’s ab ility to integrate
him self and his architecture into the cultural sphere o f h is adopted home. The
Pasaje Royal epitomizes these tw o characteristics: not o n ly did it afford elites
an opportunity to p erform cosm op olitanism a lo italiano b u t it also reflected
Francisco’s personal ties, as th e site belonged to the Palacios fam ily, who h ap
pened to be the architect’s in-law s. Later works con tinued to reap the rewards
of personal connections but a lso introduced a search for an A n d ean vernacular
modernism. This transition reflected Francisco’s d eveloping hybridity, which
advanced without elim inating h is Old World élan. A s su ch, the D urin i oeuvre
can be viewed as an attem pt to lin k an ecum enical p erso n al h isto ry w ith the
spirit o f national renewal th a t su ffu sed Q uito’s political an d cu ltu ral landscape
in the early twentieth century.
The D urini firm ’s b u sin ess practices m irrored th is aesthetic developm ent,
which can be seen th ro u gh a n an alysis o f its corresp on d en ce, w orkbooks,
sketches, drafts, and the fir m ’s library. These d ocu m en ts have on ly recently
been donated to the M useo de la Ciudad in Q uito b y Fran cisco D u rin i’s ch il
dren, and this study is the first to utilize them . T h e y d em on strate both the
tenuous nature o f arch itecture as enterprise as w ell as the m ultiple strategies
the Durinis employed to overcom e the difficulties o f b u ild in g in a peripheral
Along with the firm ’s u rb an e im age and the p rin cip al architects’ constant
u8 \ The Durini C osm opolis
refinem ent o f their tech nique, three other factors proved invaluable in produc
ing a vibrant firm . T h e first concerned the aforem entioned drive to perm eate the
inner sanctum o f th e quiteño upper class. E ach o f the three D urinis diligently
cultivated relationships w ith m em bers o f the c ity ’s upper classes, both socially
an d aesthetically. Seco n d , they persistently sou gh t to develop local sources for
the fine woodwork, m eta ls, and m arble scu lp tu re ad orn ing their structures in
order to elim inate th eir reliance on foreign artisan s, a strategy that allow ed them
to significantly u n d ercu t their com petition. Perhaps m ost im portant, however,
was their w illin gn ess to experim ent so as to f u lfill the w him s o f an eccentric
elite with at times exotic tastes.
T his analysis o f the firm ’s successful cu ltu ral integration efforts focuses first
on the elements o f m im esis and hybridity in colo n ial and nineteenth-century
Ecuadorian architecture. It also homes in on th e D u rin i fam ily’s developm ent of
a cosm opolitan ve rn a cu la r architecture. T he sto ry begins w ith two brothers, Lo
renzo and Francisco D u rin i V asalli, who im m igrated to Costa R ica fro m their
native Switzerland, where Lorenzo had b efrien d ed exiled Ecuadorian politician
Leonidas Plaza d u rin g the 1890s. Seduced b y P laza’s offer o f patronage, Lorenzo
m igrated to Q uito in 1904. Plaza’s com m issions largely evaporated a fter Loren
zo’s arrival, leading to the form ation o f a new com p an y with his sons, Pedro and
Francisco D urini C áceres. Lorenzo died p rem aturely, in 1906, likely due in part
to exhaustion and overw ork, but the business practices o f his new firm and the
im portance that the p erform ance o f cosm op olitan ism played, both personally
and professionally, in its success is worthy of-study. Francisco’s developm ent of
an A ndean vern acu lar m odernism unified h is p ersonal heritage and historicist
training, and h is h a n d lin g o f Italian stile floreale, the c ity ’s colonial palate, and
the universal aspirations o f his clientele are o f p artic u la r interest.
ous seat o f th e A udiencia president, follow ing the split from G ra n Colom bia in
1830. C h ange cam e about suddenly in 1868, when a devastating earthquake left
m any b u ild in gs badly dam aged an d destroyed the towers o f th e S an Francisco
church.9 President Gabriel G arcia M oren o, whose penchant fo r pu blic works has
been noted, took advantage o f th is situation and not only fu n n e le d state funds
into the reconstruction o f the ch urch b u t also took steps to d evelop a local in
frastructure for m odern construction an d design. A s such, h is adm inistration’s
efforts ought to be considered both an im portation o f European know-how and
the establishm ent o f a local cadre o f train ed architects and a rtisa n s heralding
the expansion o f m odern historicist construction in the last th ird o f the century.
One o f the first steps in the e ffo rt w as the establishm ent o f the Polytech
nic U niversity in 1870. Its Jesuit professors not only revolutionized cartography
but also taught d raftin g and a rch itectu ral design. Juan M en te n ’s im pact was
particularly instrum ental given h is role as chief architect fo r the National Ob
servatory, the first built in South A m e ric a. Garcia M oreno in vited not only the
university’s Jesuit professors but oth er European architects, in clu d in g English
m an T h o m as Reed and the G e rm an Francisco Schm idt, to p articip ate in state
projects. R eed , though a transient, produced several m on u m en tal works in the
early 1870s, including the panopticon prison , the garden path s o f A lam ed a Park,
and the im posing stone La Paz B rid ge crossing the M a ch á n g a ra R iver at the
city’s so u th ern entry.10 Schm idt, w ho began his stay in Q uito b y erecting the Es
cuela de A rte s y Oficios, an artisan school ru n by the C atholic C h u rch , became
one o f the critical figures o f quiteño construction over the n e x t several decades,
eventually joining forces with the engineer, architect, and carto grap h er Gual-
berto Pérez in one o f the city’s m o st im portant arch itectu ral concerns o f the
fin-de-siglo. Sch m id t’s historicist roots are reflected not on ly in the Romanesque
o f the E scu ela de A rtes y O ficios (and its incorporation o f G o th ic arches) but
also in h is choice o f a neoclassical ethos for the Teatro N acion al Sucre, perhaps
his m ost im portant project o f this period . Begun in 1879, yet not com pleted until
the centennial o f independence fro m Spain in 1922, the w o rk ’s m ain entry incor
porated the original arches o f the slaughterhouse that had p revio u sly dominated
the square.11
A lth o u gh both Reed and S ch m id t offered classes at the Polytech nic Univer
sity, arch itectural studies and m on u m en tal construction stagn ated during the
Progressive era as the national go vern m en t moved away fro m u rb an revitaliza
tion. T h e few changes to the c ity ’s architectural landscape ca m e in the form of
m od ernizin g face-lifts for the agin g structures o f the colo n ial city center. Few
and far betw een, they nevertheless preoccupied the m u n icip ality, which passed
an early zoning law (as part o f an 18 90 ordinance) seeking to encourage regular
ity am ong new and extant buildings b y preserving horizontal continuity, requir
ing w hitew ashed or painted façad es in sensible colors, an d ro u n d ed corners.11
A ttem pts to create new m onum ents d id occur, notably when a statue o f Marshal
The Durini Cosm opolis / 121
Fig. 5.2. Lorenzo D u rin i, S a n José N ational Theater, stairw ell (1897). C ourtesy D urini C ollec
tion. Museo de la C iu d a d , Q uito.
position bred sustained c o n flict w ith the director o f p u b lic w orks, Nicolás Cha
va rria , who ultimately resigned fro m his post, the first o f th ree such resignations
over the next two years. In 18 95, the exasperated a d m in istratio n finally looked
abroad, inviting Italian engineer R u y Cristóforo M o lin a ri to repair the damage.
T h e D urini brothers to ok advantage o f this pow er v a c u u m to increase their
profile. The firm had been en gaged w ith the project sin ce 1890, when portions
o f Francisco the Elder’s design h a d been incorporated in to th e initial Italianate
p roposal. D urini H erm anos secu red a subcontract in 1893 to provide stairwells
for the m ain foyer o f th e'theater (fig. 5.2), but, w ith ou t a cen tral overseer on the
p roject, Lorenzo’s role ste a d ily increased. These new responsibilities included
b u ild in g dressing rooms an d p rovid in g ever more s ta tu a ry (including one piece
that h ad originally been d estin e d for a private m au so leu m and accidentally got
w rap ped into the budget). B y th e tim e M olinari a rriv e d , Lorenzo had become
de facto director o f the project a n d was hoping to b e able to continue working
on th e interior. Indeed, th e D u rin is subm itted a p ro p o sa l to finalize their ef
forts; however, their insisten ce on continuing paym ents to Italian vendors when
p rod ucts h ad yet to be received poisoned the public to th e ir case. The contract
u ltim ately went to M o lin ari’s m ore established firm , b u t the D urinis had suc
c essfu lly raised their n ation al p rofile.'8
A n o th er by-product w as th e grow ing attention th at Loren zo D urini received
from a fellow mason and p ro m in en t Ecuadorian e x ile, G eneral Leonidas Plaza
G utierrez. Plaza was a m em b er o f Eloy A lfaro’s R a d ic a l L iberal Party who had
left Ecuador for exile in S a n José in 1884 after a failed u p risin g . His fascination
w ith Lorenzo’s statuary led to conversations concerning va st public projects, in
clu d in g a m agisterial Legislative Palace, that he h o p ed to erect when he finally
retu rn ed to Ecuador. W hen P la z a received news o f th e L ib e ra l Revolution in late
1895 and returned to h is h o m ela n d , Lorenzo and F ran cisco D u rin i expected to
soon follow their friend to tra n sfo rm the A ndean cap ital.
T h is large-scale project lan gu ish ed during the first years o f the Liberal R ev
olu tion, however, due to c o n tin u in g political strife in E cu a d o r and a growing
r ift betw een Plaza and E lo y A lfa r o over the speed w ith w hich the separation
o f church and state sh ould b e instituted. Plaza’s v ic to r y in the 1901 presiden
tial elections not only accelerated the passage o f a n ticle rical laws but also led to
h is extended patronage o f th e a rts. Besides estab lish in g th e E B A and recruit
ing the conservative acad em icist Giácom o R ad iconcin i to h ead its architectural
p rog ram , Plaza hoped to m a k e a dram atic m ark on th e capital by keeping his
pledge to Lorenzo D urini. P la z a soon invited him to su b m it blueprints for a vast
new Legislative Palace.
Loren zo’s blueprints, w h ic h were completed b y P la z a ’s inaugural in 1902,
m et R ad icon cin i’s preconditions by virtue o f his stric t adherence to neoclassical
id io m w hile also bowing to P la z a ’s desire for a m o n u m e n t to secular society.
H owever, the split in L iberal ra n k s m eant that sec u rin g congressional approval
w o uld take tim e, regardless o f th e design’s m erit. P la z a opted to introduce his
The Durini Cosm opolis / 125
Fig. 5.3. Com m em orative photo o f th e P laza de la Independencia o n the occasion o f the 1906
d ed ication o f the m onum ent. C o u rtesy D u rin i Collection, M u seo d e la C iu d a d , Quito.
that he could not afford.24 In d eed , b y the end o f the m on th , he considered mov
ing to L im a to work near his fath er since no opportunities h ad yet opened up in
Q u ito .25
A grow in g rift with Fran cisco the Elder, who h ad yet to fin d an American
p a rtn e r fo r the waterworks, exacerbated the situation. A n g r y confrontations
betw een the siblings ended w ith Fran cisco storm ing ou t o f L oren zo s house dur
ing one o f h is periodic visits to Q u ito and em barking fo r C o sta R ica, vowing to
d issolve the partnership.26 T h ese challenges finally in sp ired Lorenzo to enact a
p la n he h ad long contem plated, one that involved fo rm in g a partnership with
h is son s to com pete for the scan t com m issions available in h is adopted home.
T h is idea appears to have o c c u rre d to h im as early as Ju ly 19 0 3, when he ex
h orted Pedro to quickly liquidate the com pany in San José an d join him in Quito
as soon as possible.27 Pedro’s b u sin ess background w o u ld provide welcome re
lie f fro m the d aily grind for Loren zo, yet the key to th e endeavor concerned his
older son, Francisco M an uel, w ho w as then a student at the Instituto Técnico
di M ila n o . A s Lorenzo explain ed in a letter to his fath er that October, forming
the com p an y would allow “ M an u elito ,” who was m ak in g rapid progress through
h is p rogram in M ilan, to su p p lem en t his income w ith side projects and gain
valuable experience as both a d ra fte r and as a liaison w ith Lorenzo s Italian con
ta cts.28 Unspoken was the sim ple consideration that th e m ove would drastically
The Durini C osm opolis / 127
Fig. 5.4. D etail o f com m em orative photo o f the P iaza de !a Independencia fro m the centennial
celebrations o f 19 0 9 . C ou rtesy D u rin i C ollection , M u seo d e la C iu dad, Q uito.
the monument’s sy m m e try despite its fig u ra l em phasis on the east. T h e shift
also amplified the piece’s cultural specificity b y incorporating a repeatin g global
motif along the base’s perim eter, thus both rein forcin g the balance betw een the
monument and the p laza and also trading u p o n the nation’s and the c ity ’s equa
torial associations. T h e global m otif was rep eated at the apex, where it served as
a base for the w inged V ictory herself. Both o f these elements m ight h ave been
Lorenzo’s suggestion, given the recent a rriv a l o f the second French Geodesic
Mission, which had reintroduced the idea o f th e c ity ’s global cen trality into the
national public sphere.
Given the conceptual strength o f F ran cisco M an u el’s final d esign fo r the
project, Lorenzo persuaded him to visit Q u ito to present the plans in the name
of L. Durini & H ijos, the new com pany he h op ed would replace th e disinte
grating Durini H erm an o s. Francisco m ad e the trip from M ila n , m a k in g a
strong pitch to a closed-door session o f the m u n icip a l council in M a rc h 1904.
Surprisingly, given the inclusion o f prop osals b y the likes o f Frédéric-A uguste
Bartholdi, fam ed d esigner o f New Y ork ’s S ta tu e o f Liberty, D u r in i’s scheme
emerged victorious, p artly as a result o f its m oderate price tag.29 A n o th er im por
tant facet appears to have been the burgeoning frien d sh ip between Pedro D urini
and the young entrepreneur Genaro L arrea, w h o recently had taken th e reins of
the committee in charge o f the project. A co n tract followed in M ay, w h ich ap
peared to secure the first lin k in a num ber o f fu tu re endeavors.30
The new com pany proved to be m ore su c c essfu l than D u rin i H erm anos,
partly because o f Plaza’s continued support b u t also because o f a sym b iotic busi
ness model. Despite w orsening stomach illn e ss, Lorenzo operated as th e chief
sales representative, given his contacts in th e u p p er echelon o f the governm ent.
For example, in 1905, he secured congressional support for his d esign s for the
new Legislative Palace and also a new c o m m issio n to erect a sm a ll m u n icip al
market on the north side o f the city, in the S a n B ias neighborhood. T h ese works
were accentuated b y Francisco M an u el’s fin ish in g touches, sent fro m M ilan ,
where he had returned to continue his stu d ies. There, he acted as a lia iso n with
local artisans, p urch ased lu xu ry m aterials su ch as marble and iron elem ents,
and continued to refine h is drafting tech n iq u es. For exam ple, he collaborated
with Froli on the revision o f the design for th e interior o f the Legislative Palace
that was finally accepted b y the Congress, in th e process accentuating ornam en
tal elements to take advantage o f the sc u lp to r’s idiom . Back in Q u ito , Pedro
provided logistical su pp ort for the co o rd in atio n o f m aterial tra n sp o rt w ithin
the country and courted influential young peo ple, involving them as a resource
for the design team . A case in point can be seen in an expedition he o rgan ized to
hunt an Andean condor w ith the objective o f em balm ing it to send to A d riático
Froli, who had a poor grasp o f the physiognom y o f the bird. A lth ou gh no condor
was found, the expedition helped cement P ed ro’s local contacts an d reputation
as a sporting aficionado, which would later p rove advantageous.3'
But the spirit o f collaboration could not h elp the firm contend w ith the grave
T h e D urini Cosmopolis / 129
Lorenzo’s death presented a m ajor challenge for th e D u rin i firm . Faced w ith
the prospect o f d im in ish in g retu rn s, given the tigh t arch itectu ral m arket, the
brothers spent the next several years attem pting to d iv e rsify operations, w ith
mixed results. Pedro, who h a d lon g been charged w ith coordinating the firm ’s
finances, attempted to d evelo p a store specializin g in lu x u ry and im po rted
goods, particularly sp o rtin g accessories. A lthough h is contacts am ong the cap i
tal’s playboys did not ga rn er enough income for th is endeavor to succeed, th ey
did bring him several com m ission s for m ausoleum s, w h ich proved a relatively
profitable but enervating ven tu re, ultim ately abandoned.
Francisco continued to stress the technical e x p e rtise he h ad gained in M i
lan when wooing clients, b u t, u n lik e his brother, he sou gh t local, hybrid m ean s
of nourishing his business. T h is involved deepening h is relationships w ith the
municipality, the national governm ent, and the elite, w hose ranks he u n equ ivo
cally joined following h is 19 08 m arriage to Rosa Palacios. He also developed an
130 \ The Durini C osm opolis
a r t i s a n a l w o rk sh o p t o p r o d u c e le sse r - g ra d e s t a t u a r y a n d w o od w ork in o r d e r to
c u r b th e c o s ts a s s o c i a t e d w ith th e h ig h ly t r a n s n a t i o n a l o p e r a tio n t h a t L o re n z o
h a d fa v o re d . E v e n tu a lly t h e s e d e c isio n s w o u ld l e a d t o s h i f t s in h is a r c h ite c tu ra l
s e n s ib ilit y , w h ich d e v e l o p e d a h y p h e n a te d A n d e a n - I t a l i a n v e r n a c u la r . T h e
t e c h n iq u e s th a t e a c h o f t h e D u r in is d e p lo y e d t o s c r a p e to g e th e r c o m m is s io n s
in a t ig h t m a r k e t t h u s b u i l t u p o n c u ltiv a te d p e r s o n a s a s c o s m o p o lit a n a r tis ts
a n d te c h n ic ia n s. A D u r i n i s t r u c t u r e re p re se n te d m o r e t h a n a b u ild in g — it rep
r e s e n te d a w ay o f life d e f in e d b y a m o d e r n s e n s ib ilit y t h a t w a s c o n s tr u c te d w ith
m o d e r n te c h n iq u e s.
Pedro D urini, in p a rtic u la r, tended a rep u tatio n as a detached cosm opolite
w ith a flair for ad ven tu re th at dovetailed w ith h is com m ercial interests in im
p o rtin g lu xu ry goods. A s a you th o f sixteen he h a d le ft C osta Rica to develop an
im p o rt store in G u a te m a la , w h ich su m m arily fa ile d . Undeterred, as the century
d aw n ed he traveled to H am b u rg — then one o f th e w o rld 's largest p o rts, with
sh ipp in g com panies tra d in g w ith South A m e ric a, A fr ic a , and A sia— to perfect
h is business acum en. H e stu d ied at its u n iversity, took advantage o f the city’s
sp o rtin g culture, and p erfected his linguistic sk ills (he could com petently speak
a n d w rite French, G e rm a n , Italian , Spanish, a n d English ). He also appears to
h ave engaged w ith th e a rch itectu ral inn ovation s develo pin g am ong th e Wag
n e r school in V ien n a a n d w as m ost likely th e so u rce o f a series o f m agazines
on th is work that u ltim a te ly found their way in to Fran cisco D u rin i’s p rivate li
brary. Upon his retu rn to S an José in 1902, Pedro su ccessfu lly acted as business
m an ag er for the fa m ily firm w h ile also d ab b lin g in ready-m ade construction
m aterials purchased fro m Europe and the U n ited States.55 H is sm all inventory
o f m arble and iron o rn a m e n ts, paint, and w o o d w o rk in g tools followed h im to
E c u a d o r in early 19 0 5, a n d th ey becam e the b a sis fo r a'store that w as soon an
im p o rtan t side venture fo r the firm .’6 A s early a s S ep tem b er 1905, L . D u rin i &
H ijos was filling orders fo r extensive interior rem od elin g. A particularly adven
tu rous client, M igu el P áez, decided to outfit h is en tire hom e, including a dining
ro o m , various sittin g ro o m s, and a m usic ro o m (w ith piano). Páez picked the
desired items out o f a c a ta lo g featuring the p ro d u cts o f distributors as far-flung
as Paris, H am burg, an d N ew York but that were d eliverable w ithin a scan t seven
m onths.37
T h e store operated la rge ly as a sideline fo r P ed ro, who appears to have de
voted m ost o f his tim e to sp o rt and leisure. T h ese activities, however, expanded
h is social contacts a n d e v e n tu a lly led to h is first independent com m issions.
Soo n after arriving in Q u ito, he helped organize a n d fou n d the Polo C lu b at the
H ippodrom e in the c ity ’s north ern environs. T h e re , he and his fellow playboys,
in clu d in g his brother F ran cisco , in co n gru ou sly d em o n strated E u ropean flair
w ith overly long polo m a lle ts ill suited for u se w ith m in u scu le A n d ean horses
(fig. 5.5). Pedro also fen ced , h ik ed , and, in A p ril 19 0 7, founded the A n d es Tennis
C lu b , which today is th e old est country club in th e city.38
The D urini Cosmopolis / 131
pig. 5.5. Pedro D u rin i, one o f the fo u n d ers o f the Polo Club at the H ipp od rom e, w ith his long
European m allet and m inuscule A n d e a n polo pony. Courtesy D u rin i C ollection , M useo de la
Ciudad, Quito.
Pedro D urini’s style appears to have endeared him to the quiteno upper crust
and made him one o f the risin g stars o f a widespread m ovem ent geared toward
adopting a sophisticated c u ltu re o f leisure. The new leisure class provided a
source o f amusement and a n a tu ra l clientele for the lavish m ausoleum s Pedro
designed. The earliest and the best know n o f these projects cam e to him through
his debonair colleague G enaro L arrea, whose im portant role in the realization
of the independence m onum ent has already been noted. A fte r Larrea’s father,
Teodoro, perished while visitin g C an nes in 1905, the you ng m an persuaded his
mother, Teresa Valdivieso, to h ire Pedro to build a fin a l resting place in San
Diego cemetery, home to the rem ain s o f Quito’s best fam ilies.39
Pedro had already established his credentials as a producer o f m ausoleums
when, following his fath er’s illn e ss, he completed anoth er S an Diego resting
place that Lorenzo had d esign ed fo r the Palacios fam ily. Pedro now worked
diligently on the Larrea com m ission in the hope that he w ould be able to set
up an independent operation sp ecializin g in these elaborate m onum ents. He
presented more than a th ousan d draw ings to M rs. L arrea, who proved to be a
particularly finicky patron. S h e fin ally chose a p articu larly lovely plan featur
ing a winged angel resting b y a cross, her head propped up b y her left arm , her
132 \ The D urini Cosmopolis
Fig. 5.6. P ed ro D u rin i, Larrea M ausoleum (1908). C ourtesy D u rin i C o llectio n , M u seo d e la
C iudad, Q uito.
the mausoleum project com pleted earlier th a n o rig in a lly planned, Pedro b egan
to p a n ic . He thus exh o rted Francisco to en ergize C ap u rro while also cau tion in g
the s c u lp to r to tak e p artic u la r care with th is piece, given the' recent a rriv a l in
Q u ito of his form er riv a l, Carlo Libero V alen te, w hom Pedro feared w o u ld tr y
to t a r n is h C apurro’s local reputation. M ore d isa stro u s news followed w hen one
of the angel’s w in gs broke o ff during packing— luckily, the dam age w as m inor.
A lt h o u g h it took u n til the following A p ril fo r th e th irty-five crates h o ld in g the
w o rk to reach G u a y a q u il, they arrived sa fe ly in Q uito by M ay 1908 an d were
quickly assem bled.41
Pedro’s d ifficulties m anaging the w him s o f h is patrons and designers illu m i
nate several o f the obstacles that needed to be overcom e in order to su ccessfu lly
manage the type o f transnational operation th e D u rin is ran. C h ief am o n g these
w e re the frequent h in d ran ces to the sh ipp in g o f b u ild in g m aterials, sta tu ary ,
ornament, ironw ork, an d so forth. W hile th ese often stem m ed fro m u n a v o id
able transportation problem s, they resulted in p rod u ction delays. T o fo restall
impatient clients lik e the Larreas, the com p an y took precautionary m easu res to
avoid defaulting on th eir contracts or ru n n in g over budget. These p recau tio n ary
practices began d u rin g Lorenzo’s era as a re su lt o f the problem s that h ad cost
Durini Herm anos th e com m ission on th e N a tio n a l Theater but b ecam e co d i
fied when it appeared th at his frequent collaborator, A driático Froli, w o u ld not
be able to com plete h is work on the in d epen d en ce m onum ent on tim e. W ith
Pedro’s help, Lorenzo com piled a copybook rep rod u cin g the entire series o f co n
tracts and correspondence w ith the scu lptor in preparation for p o ssib ly su in g
him for breach o f contract, which was u ltim a tely unnecessary in that in sta n ce .42
A more problem atic situation developed w ith regard to C apurro, F ran cisco ’s
intimate friend fro m h is days studying in M ila n . T h e two had first collaborated
on a monument to th e poet, Juan M ontalvo, in the central A ndean c ity o f A m -
bato. The design featu red a bronze statue o f th e liberal w riter atop a p ed e sta l,
quill in hand, w ith a m arble Apollo secretively crouchin g over h is ly re below
so as to share h is in tim ate knowledge on ly w ith the genius h im se lf.43 E ven at
this early stage, a m ild conflict developed as C a p u rro ’s paym ents w ere delayed
during the 1908 fisca l crisis. The friends co n tin u ed to collaborate over the n ext
three years un til C a p u rro subm itted his o w n design for a m onum ent th at w as
to be erected in L a ta cu n ga to honor a d eceased philanth rop ist n am ed V icente
León. The fact th at th e design was subm itted th rou gh the E cuadorian co n su l in
Genoa, Leonidas P allares A rteta, whom F ran cisco h ad introduced to C ap u rro ,
compounded h is sense o f betrayal. Fran cisco th u s q uickly drafted h is ow n d e
sign, along w ith a n extensive letter to the h e a d o f the com m ittee e x p la in in g
his philosophy as an architect. The c u ltivatio n o f the client worked; F ran cisco
was granted the com m ission . However, the b reach w ith Capurro delayed oth er
projects until an ad eq u ate replacement w as fo u n d the follow ing y e a r (1912) in
another Italian, R ica rd o B. Espinosa.44
Francisco’s r e s p o n s e to th is on going d iffic u lt y b u ilt u p o n a s o lu tio n h is f a
134 \ The D urini Cosmopolis
ther had in itiated soon after arrivin g in Q uito, which was to d ev elo p h is own
workshop. A t first, this enterprise w as dedicated to w oodw orking, w ith a focus
on furniture m ak in g , but it u ltim ately developed into a m ore ro u n d ed enter
prise. Francisco’s developm ent o f th is w o rksh op was facilitated b y the growing
availability o f trained m asons and a rtisa n s who studied at the E scu ela de Artes
y Oficios. Som e o f these individuals becam e long-term collaborators, such as the
stonecutter Pedro Condor, who w o u ld becom e best know n fo r h is w ork in the
1920s on the C ircu lo M ilitar, a social fa c ility bankrolled by the a rm e d forces and
featuring an orn ate stone façade and in terio r décor with A n d ean m o tifs, such as
the repeated im age o f a condor, evoking the national coat o f a rm s.45 T h ese skilled
workers contributed greatly to d im in ish in g the reliance on fo reign artisan s ex
cept for the m ost delicate o f tasks. M oreover, D urin i took advan tage o f his own
technical sk ills as an engineer to lim it h is expenditures. He h a d acqu ired this
technical know ledge during his stu d ies in M ila n , where the In stitu to Tecnico
represented th e on ly institution in Ita ly w here one could sim u ltan eo u sly learn
the craft o f the designer and that o f th e capomaestro, or m aster bu ild er. This
multifaceted exp ertise allowed Fran cisco to build a reputation as a n engineer as
well as an arch itect, which expanded h is opportunities in the A n d e a n citadel.46
One o f th e m ost im portant clients Fran cisco courted as an e n gin eer was the
Quito m un icip ality, which respected h is talents as a result o f h is efforts with
the colum n to independence but w h ich still harbored some resen tm en t toward
the fam ily fo llo w in g the w aterw orks debacle. The city go ve rn m en t hoped to
beautify Q uito fo r the 1909 cen ten n ial an d as a result engaged in a number
o f im provem ents to the local in fra stru c tu re an d recreational space. Francisco
D u rin i’s M ila n e se experience w o rkin g w ith iron helped p ersu a d e the m unici
pality to hire L. D u rin i & Hijos to b u ild m onum ental gates en closin g the Plaza
de la Independencia as part o f the p a r k ’s reconstruction in 19 0 5. Follow ing his
father’s d eath , Fran cisco took the le ad o n th is project and a lso persu ad ed the
body to gran t h im and his brother o th er sm all jobs, such as le velin g the streets
around the p la z a and quickly b u ild in g a m odest m arketplace in th e northern
neighborhood o f S an Bias. Francisco com pleted the latter ahead o f schedule and
under budget as a result o f a successfu l negotiation o f a 50 percent reduction in
the transportation costs o f m aterials fro m G u ayaqu il to Q uito.47
These m in o r contracts began to p ay o ff in Novem ber 1906, w h en Francisco
was hired as a consultant to ascertain the possibility o f renovating th e municipal
headquarters. In his report, D u rin i arg u e d that any attem pt to sim p ly provide
a m odernizing facelift would fail b ecau se the w alls could not su p p o rt an addi
tional story an d because the proportions o f the façade were u n b a la n ced and did
not follow “el estilo queostenta” (the style it purports). A s such, he recommended
razing the C a sa M un icipal, e x p ro p ria tin g som e adjacent la n d , a n d im m edi
ately in itiatin g a contest to design a n appropriate venue for th e au gu st body.
The budget w o u ld be substantial: S /.12 0 ,0 0 0 . Although there w a s in itially some
resistance to h is suggestions, an im p assio n ed speech by the procurador sindico
The Durini Cosmopolis / 135
Beyond Historicism
W hen the D urinis a rriv e d in Ecuador, they faced m a n y com m ercial chal
lenges— difficulties that th e y w ere able to overcom e b y con vin cin g clients of
the q u a lity o f their technical tra in in g and by cultivatin g an air o f m odern cos
m opolitanism . They also h a d the advantage o f being able to insert themselves
seam lessly into the m ain stre a m o f Ecuadorian arch itecto n ic circles by virtue
o f th eir facility within the a cad e m icist style then in vo g u e in the capital. The
p o p u larity o f this academ icist style was partly due to th e prevalence o f positiv
ist p hilosop h y w ithin state circles as well as to the presence and influence of
G iacom o Radiconcini in the E scu ela de Bellas A rtes. L oren zo’s extensive expe
rience working within h isto ric ist traditions h ad served th e D u rin is well in this
regard, as did Francisco’s tra in in g in M ilan, a city w ell kn ow n for its conserva
tive architectural clim ate. H ow ever, by the early 19 10 s, Fran cisco had begun to
alter h is tectonic language to tak e m ore advantage o f th e possibilities o f modern
con stru ction techniques, in c lu d in g the use o f pou red concrete and an altered
fo rm a l language that b e g a n to be influenced by a rt n ou veau elem ents. These
changes would be incorporated into the Pasaje R o yal a n d developed further in
h is m ature eclectic works, p a rtic u la rly in com m ercial b u ild in gs such as the Cir-
cu lo M ilita r and the B anco d el Pichincha h ead q u arters alon g with the m any
residential villas that dotted th e M ariscal and other p a rts o f the old city.
A lth o u gh Francisco D u r in i never fu lly abandoned the form al language of
European historicism, these later structures m arked h is increased desire to form
a seam less integration w ith e x istin g buildings in th e case o f those in the centro
and a grow ing interest in ever m ore elaborate and im agin ative ornam entation in
the new villas. This g rad u a l change was partly a resu lt o f h is personal interests
but largely developed fro m h is deepening involvem ent w ith in the social circles
o f h is adopted hom eland. O ver the next two decades, therefore, D u rin i emerged
as a practitioner o f what o u gh t to be considered a h yph en ated architecture that
incorporated his roots in E u ro p ean historicism an d sen sitivity to the whim s of
h is new compatriots and clientele.
T h e projects that L o ren zo D u rin i had arranged fo r h is sons had ru n their
course b y 1912, a year th at m u st have been traum atic fo r Francisco due to not
o n ly Pedro’s death but a lso th e recent alienation o f P ietro Capurro. Francisco
em erged from this crisis w ith help from the P alacios fa m ily , who acceded to
h is request to build on th e ir la n d a m assive shopping arcade, the Pasaje Royal.
T h e piece was indebted to th e great nineteenth-century passages and in particu
la r responded to M ilan ’s G a lle r ia Vittorio E m anuele II, w ith which Francisco
w o u ld have been quite fa m ilia r from his school days. A t the sam e tim e, however,
its scale and approach to orn a m e n t m arked a great d ep artu re from Francisco s
The Durini C osm opolis / 137
earlier h isto ric ist work. It was b y fa r the largest com m ercial establish m en t in
the city, w ith dozens o f stores, a theater, restaurants, and cafes— a p lace to see
and be seen. For a tim e, the Pasaje w as Q u ito’s tallest b u ild in g , w ith its four
stories ou tstrip p in g the horizontality o f a city whose p roxim ity to several fault
lines still lim its its potential for a ve rtic a l cityscape. In addition, it incorporated
aspects o f contem p orary m ovem ents in its use o f art nouveau’s decorative lan
guage in the floral designs affixed to th e entrance archway and first-floor lintels
along with the use o f Secessionist-inspired display cases and ligh tin g fixtu res in
the interior.
The m ove from a conventional h isto ric ism toward an eclectic approach ref
erencing the early m odernist m ovem ents probably had been brew in g for som e
time but b een delayed by the need to fu lfill Lorenzo’s c o m m issio n s. Pedro
Durini m ay h ave been an early sou rce o f interest in the revo lu tio n ary form al
language o f th e Jugendstil, as h is stu d ie s in H am burg (1899—1902) coincided
with the m o ve m en t’s beginnings, a n d he w as m ost likely th e p ro cu rer o f the
several early issues o f Der Architect th a t b ecam e part o f the D u rin i library. These
journals featu red a variety o f designs fro m the W agner school, in clu d in g works
by Josef H o ffm a n n and Joze Plecnik a m o n g others. By the tim e o f h is a rrival in
Milan the follow in g year, Francisco w o u ld have been well aware o f the inn ova
tions occurring in Europe.
Moreover, he cam e to the L o m b ard m etropolis im m ediately a fte r th e 1902
Turin exposition o f decorative art, w h ich established the Italian presence o f art
nouveau, k n ow n locally as stile floreale o r stile Liberte. A lthough it is u n lik e ly that
he experienced the exhibit firsthand, he w o u ld surely have b een exp o sed to its
repercussions w ith in the M ilanese a rc h ite c tu ra l establishm ent and b een fa
miliar with the vangu ard production th a t figures such as R aim o n d o D ’A ronco,
Joseph O lbrich, and Charles R ennie M ack in to sh unveiled th at year. He w ould
certainly have experienced the M ila n e se experim entation o f G iu sepp e Som m a-
ruga’s Palazzo Gastiglione (1901—1903), w ith its flam boyant th ree-d im ensional
floral decor.52 O ver the next several y e ars, Francisco appears to have continued
reading abou t th e new style in m a g a z in e s such as L’Edilisia M oderna an d to
have secured th e com m em orative issu e o f L’A rchittetura Italiana d ed icated to
the 1911 w o rld ’s fair in Turin. He a lso p rocu red a copy o f E m erich Fellin ger’s
Das moderne Zim m er (1907), which fea tu re d Secessionist fu rn itu re and interior
decoration an d w hich could be show n to clients w ishing to p arta k e o f the m ost
contemporary innovations.53
D urin i’s venture into a hybrid b len d o f his.toricism and th e stirrin g s o f a
modernist aesthetic reflected these in flu e n ces, introduced a new fo rm a l la n
guage into the city, and established h im as an independent voice exp an d in g the
possibilities o f local architecture beyon d th e academ icism o f the E scu ela de Bel
las Artes. The m unicipal council m em bers, w ith whom D urini still enjoyed close
contacts, reified this position by presen tin g h im w ith an award in 1915— the re-
138 \ T h e Durini Cosmopolis
Fig. 5.7. Fran cisco D urin i, C írcu lo M ilita r under con struction (1920s). Note also the pilaster
a d o rn m e n t on the crum bling co lo n ial next door. C ourtesy D u rin i C o llectio n , M useo de la
C iu d a d , Q uito.
cen tly approved Premio al O rn ato . T he popularity o f h is arcade as a nexus for the
p erfo rm an ce o f m odernity a lso persuaded other patro n s to place new projects in
h is h a n d s. T h e earliest con tract cam e from the C írcu lo M ilitar, a social club or
g a n iz e d in 1916 by officers fro m the arm ed forces. President A lfred o Baquerizo
M oren o granted the group the exclusive use o f an e xistin g structure to develop
as a gatherin g space, a p ro ject th at the group’s d irecto r, G eneral Moisés Oliva,
o p ted to grant to Francisco D u rin i. A s in his 1906 negotiation s with the munici
p a l co u n cil, the architect m ain ta in ed that the e xtan t stru ctu re would be unable
to b ear the load o f a third sto ry. T h is tim e, the b u ild in g w as prom ptly razed to the
g ro u n d — a reflection o f the g ro w th in his reputation over the intervening decade.
The Durini C osm opolis / 139
Although th e plans for the new stru ctu re were approved in 1917, it took u n
til 1926 for th e b u ild in g to open for p u blic functions, while fin al touches were
implemented as late as 1936. The re su ltin g facility was the m ost d ram atic ex
pression o f leisu re space in Quito and soon becam e a favorite spot not on ly for
the m ilitary b u t also for private galas a n d state balls. The ground floor boasted
spacious reception h alls and a fine restau ran t while amenities such as a library
and guest ro om s were to be found on th e second story.
The C írcu lo M ilita r (fig. 5.7) represented the first o f D u rin i’s structures to
extensively featu re regional m aterials a n d the craftsm anship o f local artisan s;
it was a strategy th at anticipated the incorporation o f autochthonous m ateri
als by architects lik e M exico’s Juan O ’G o rm an in his search for an alternative
modernism d u rin g the 1930s.54 Its façad e evoked the city’s colonial architecture
through the incorporation o f andesite, a light-gray stone used extensively in La
Compañía an d in the central nave o f S a n Francisco but which h ad fallen into
disuse until a new q u arry in L atacu n ga w as inaugurated in the early tw enti
eth century. D u rin i had already experim en ted with this stone in the base for a
statue o f A n to n io José de Sucre that s till sits before the Santo D om ingo m on
astery, and he chose it for its relationship to the city’s m onum ents. W hile the
main thrust o f the façade thus referenced the past, its tectonic and decorative
elements addressed the present and fu tu re. The fram e as well as the ro o f incor
porated the first local usage o f reinforced concrete, which was left untreated on
the roof. The lintels and capitals o f the second floor included three-dim ensional
floral ornam entation typical o f stile floreale w hile the m ain iron-and-glass door
was based on a design by Joseph Trier, a fu rn itu re m an ufacturer then residing
in Darmstadt, hom e o f the fam ed Ju gen d stil colony and Technical University.55
This door, however, was not an elaborate im port, as would have been the case
only a few years earlier, but was instead the product o f local sculptors Segundo
Ortiz and M anuel A yala, who also cast th e letters identifying the b u ild in g above
the central arch and the bronze condors on the interior stairw ells. T h e latter, a
late addition to the plan, expanded the b u ild in g’s stylistic m elange b y evoking
art deco’s geom etric abstraction. T he lu sh interior palate in golds and browns
accentuated the bronze ornam entation w h ile an iron-and-glass cu po la provided
a dance o f natural light typical o f a D u rin i structure.
This m erger o f autochthonous m a te ria ls and nationalist sym b olog y with
a dynamic eclecticism incorporating a rt d e co an d stile floreale m o tifs also per-
meated D u rin i’s other major com m ercial structure from this era— the Banco
del Pichincha headquarters (fig. 5.8). Fo u n d ed in 1906, the bank h ad been wait
ing to build a central location for som e years and had co n d u cte d p relim in ary
% talks with D u rin i a s early as 1916. U ltim ately, regional com petition w ith the
Fig. 5.8. F ra n c isc o D u rin i, Banco del P ic h in c h a (1920s). C ou rtesy D u rin i C o lle c tio n , M useo de
la C iudad, Q u ito .
which w ere dom inated by a c u rv e d stairw ell in gran ite, m arble, and
in te rio rs ,
an d esite. The vast low er level com prised te lle rs’ windows fram ed in iron, again
the workmanship o f local artisans, while th e second floor com prised offices and
meeting spaces. A s in 1916, the com pletion o f the building and its re sp e c tfu l at
titude toward the venerable Jesuit church, L a C om pañía, won the c ity ’s highest
architectural p rize u p on its completion in 19 24 .56
These prom inent accolades expanded D u r in i’s visibility at precisely the m o
ment in which p rivate com m issions b e g a n to balloon as a resu lt o f th e c ity ’s
northward push in th e 1920s and 1930s. D u r in i q uickly engaged the new m arket,
completing two Italian ate villas, the T re n to an d the Trieste, b y 19 22, correctly
gauging the sh ift in dem and. His p rom inence was accentuated b y h is ties to the
military and m u n icip ality; these two stru c tu re s appeared as beacons o f m od er
nity on the Battle o f Pichincha com m em orative m ap elaborated b y these groups.
The lower prices associated with D u r in i’s m atu re structures as a resu lt o f his
growing use o f lo c a l m aterials and c ra fts m e n (many o f whom w o rk ed in h is
woodworking studios) also attracted clients desiring to advertise th eir sop h isti
cation at home as w ell as at entrepots lik e th e Pasaje Royal.57
Stylistically, D u r in i’s villas corresp on d ed to a trend in Ita lia n dom estic
construction tow ard a greater emphasis on th e vernacular; this tren d coexisted
with futurism a n d the decorative novecento m ovem ent during th e 19 20s. W hile
his colleagues in Ita ly based their stru ctu res on local vernacular fo rm s, D u rin i
continued to em u late European m odels even as he adopted the p rin cip le o f u ti
lizing local m ate ria ls and skills. He w as n ot alone in this practice, w h ich has
given some critics cause to decry the a rch itectu ral developm ent o f areas such
as the Ciudadela M a risca l Sucre as an exercise in the im portation o f styles w ith
little grounding in local custom s or in d igen o u s form s. In the 19 40 s, A m e rican
travel and c h ild re n ’s w riter Ludwig B em elm a n s lam basted the neigh borh ood
as the product o f “a pastrycook o f an arch itect who . . . has c a re fu lly assem bled
everything that is bad and aw ful.” 58 The m ore recent evaluations o f figu res such
as Manuel E sp in o sa Apolo, Paul A g u ila r, or Eduardo K in gm an have also la
mented the lack o f authenticity within th e neighborhood as a result o f its separa
tion from the “ in d igen ous” culture.
But these ch arges sim plify the point b e h in d the visu al lan gu age an d ad op
tion o f the foreign vern acular by “p astry c o o k s” such as Francisco D u rin i. H is
buildings, w h ich included Italianate v illa s , Basque cottages, French chateaus,
and even an A n d a lu sia n Arabesque p alace, corresponded to a p a rtic u la r vision
of the search for origin s that fram ed Q u ito’s en try to m odernity and dovetailed
with the coveted visio n o f cosm opolitanism as both playfully exotic an d dem on
strably rooted— q ualities that D urini em b o d ied both personally an d aestheti
cally. His gro u n d in g in M editerranean vern acu lar, coupled w ith the m alleab il
ity o f his stylistic em brace, afforded clien ts th e ability to transpose th eir desire
for the “cu ltu ral transvestism ” o f cosm o-m o d ern ity without le av in g h om e or
142 \ T h e D urini Cosmopolis
Fig. 5.9 . F ran c isc o D u rin i, G em m a D u rin i H ouse (1940s). Photograph b y the author.
Fig. 5.10. F ran cisco D u rin i, V illa V illagom ez, 1932 (restoration, 2007). Photograph by the
author.
in the early 19 40 s (fig. 5.9). A n orien talist sensibility, first explored in the m in a
rets of the B an co del Pichincha, echoed not on ly D ’Aronco’s Istanbul-influenced
stilefloreale b u t also the A ndalusian v illa s in D u rin i’s stock catalog. T h is flavor
dominated a 19 30s design for a b u llrin g bu t was most d ram atically realized in
the V illa V illag o m ez (fig. 5.10), a testam en t to A n d alu sian styles featu rin g a
144 \ T he Durini Cosmopolis
wide v a rie ty o f mosaic tiles, in tricate woodwork in the sta irw e lls and lighting
fixtures, and an extraordinary a rra y o f playful natural ligh tin g com ing in from
the glass roof. This was perhaps th e pinnacle o f D u rin i’s experim entation and
the best expression o f the desire fo r localizing a cosm opolitan vernacular. The
project once again garnered h im th e m unicipal Prem io al O rn ato in 1932.62
M ore recently, the Villa V illagom ez has earned the contem p t o f Paul A gui
lar in h is comprehensive su rve y o f quiteño architecture. A s an exam ple o f the
“gran desconcierto” (great disorder) o f the eclectic 1930s, A g u ila r m aintain s, a
p rofoun d dissonance lies in a con tem p orary assertion in E l Comercio that the
stru ctu re reflects architecture th a t w as “verdaderamente nuestro" (truly ours).6’
H owever, the claim that an A ra b e sq u e chalet truly represented an autochtho
nous E cu ad o rian spirit squares w ith the local elites’ am b ition s to showcase their
own cosm opolitanism while seek in g their origins in a d ista n t European past. In
realizing th is work, which reflected ow ner Jorge V illagom ez’s recall o f a journey
to A n d a lu cía , D urini produced fan ta sy , thus serving as a n enabler buoyed by
his ow n hybrid eclecticism. Su ch w as h is stock in trade.
fu l A tla se s— exquisitely cra fte d stone figures th at once gu ard ed the entrance to
th e B anco de Prestam os, an oth er o f D u rin i’s 1920s com m ercial establishm ents.
T o day, they hold aloft a n im age o f Ecuador’s eq u a to rial position and greet the
th o u san d s o f revelers w h o p o u r into the Estadio O lim p ico A tahualpa, the great
fo rtre ss where E cu ad o r’s n atio n al football team h a s secured its recent ru n s to
th e W orld Cup and an en d u rin g cosm opolitan aren a fo r th e d isplay o f local c u l
tu re on a global stage.
Chapter 6
A Phantasmagoric Dystopia
Eloy A lfa ro ’s 1895 arrival in Q u ito as leader o f the triu m p h an t Liberal Revolu
tion inspired the relocation o f scores o f partisan jo u rn alists, intellectuals, and
politicians clam oring to b u ild a new society. The m igrants included a young sat
irist from Cuenca nam ed M an u el J. C alle, known for his lam p oonin g portraits
of conservative ideologues.1 U p o n the appearance o f C a lle s m agazine, Revista
de Quito, in the A ndean citadel, however, the publication tu rn ed its attention to
the b an al provinciality o f C a lle ’s adopted home. His chronicles challenged the
cherished notion o f Q uito’s tradition alist image by describing it as a veneer for
an outm oded way o f life at od d s w ith the dem ands o f m od ern ity and progress.
Calle’s caustic pen rendered quiteños gullible fools ignorant o f the outside world,
as stated in an 1898 colum n ab ou t a swindling m atador w ho persuaded the su
perintendent o f police to establish an im prom ptu b u llrin g, where the vagabond
never appeared. Instead, the c it y ’s bum bling citizens p iled into the m akeshift
clearing to try to fight the b u lls them selves, with “un cholo de los nuestros" (one
of our m estizos) receiving w a rm accolades and a broken arm fo r his troubles.
As C alle p ut it, Quito rem ain ed “el país de los chinos" (the lan d o f Chinam en),
14 7
148 \ A Phantasmagoric Dystopia
ots saw a d eterm ined band attacking the h ou se o f the president o f th e Audiencia
and van d alizin g the local prison. C ityw id e carou sing spread, as crow d s publicly
pronounced th eir faith in the Franciscan fria rs, their antipathy to th e peninsu
la r A udiencia leadersh ip, and their p rid e in the barrio o f San R o q u e. T h e dis
turbances cam e to an end only when a rm ed soldiers dispersed the crow ds along
the deep ravines o f the aptly named Q u eb rada Jerusalén.
The m ille n n ia l fervor inspired b y Ib áñ ez C u evas’s inversion o f the tradi
tional im age o f Q uito as a new Rom e slum bered after this incident b u t w ould be
periodically reconfigured by reform ist m ovem ents. In 1771, for exam p le, Jesuit
M ario C icala d ecried Q uito’s ram pant gam b lin g and theft, w hich h a d reduced
the city to p o ve rty and m isery so egregious it h ad led to dem ographic collapse.6
N o less a p ersonage th an the fam ous p h ysician Eugenio Espejo fre q u e n tly sati
rized the c ity ’s m iserable health con d itio n s and its m istreatm ent o f the poor
and indigenous in pasquinades, essays, p lays, and sermons while advocating for
autonom y or even independence.7 Even the great nineteenth-century champion
o f Q uito’s artisto cratic landow ning class, G abriel Garcia M oreno, got his start
as the reform ist rector o f the city’s u n iversity and dedicated h im s e lf to purging
its hidebound professoriat.
However, th is tenet failed to take root, perhaps as a result o f th e particular
relationship betw een Q uito and its im m ed iate indigenous h in terlan d . Instead,
it took the fa ll o f the G arcian autocracy to develop its reconceptualization. Para
doxically, th is revam pin g emerged in th e w ritin gs o f G arcia M o ren o ’s staunch
ally, Juan León M era. Although know n p rim a rily in his age as a p oet— indeed,
he authored th e lyrics to Ecuador’s n ation al anthem — Mera is best remembered
today for h is rom antic novel Cumandá (1879). T h is m elodram atic piece has often
been hailed as the first Ecuadorian n a tio n a l epic; however, its im po rtan ce for
the p h an tasm agorical chronotope stem s fro m its perennial d econstru ction by
radical auth ors seeking to inform an altern ative national im age paradoxically
indebted to M era’s own interrogation o f urb an civility.
W ritten a ft e r G arcia M oreno’s a ssa ssin a tio n , M era’s novel featu res the
doomed love sto ry o f a white A ndean nam ed Carlos and the b e a u tifu l A m azo
nian p rincess C u m an d á. The p air first encounter each other fo llo w in g a deci
sion by C a rlo s’s father, Orozco, to fo u n d a m issionary station in th e Amazon.
T heir m u tu al attraction n o tw ith stan d in g, they are soon sep arated when Cu-
m an d á’s fath er travels downriver to p ledge h is allegiance to the violen t Jívaro
chief Y ah u arm aq u i. Carlos saves C u m a n d á from m arriage to Y ah u arm aq u i but
cannot u ltim ately defend her from the headhunters, a tragedy com pounded by
the m elodram atic revelation that she is in fact his sister, k id n a p p ed years ear
lier. The trad ition al scholarship on the novel highlights the them es o f incest and
racial tension in the book while u n d ersco rin g the lyricism o f M era ’s depiction
o f the A m a z o n ia n rainforest. Recent w ork by Ricardo Padrón an d Fernando
B alseca, h ow ever, em phasizes the re g io n a l cartography at th e cen ter o f the
A Phantasm agoric Dystopia / 151
ev en a lovin g rom ance with C o n su elo G ó m ez, the comely d au gh ter o f a fellow
highlander who lost his m oney and la n d s in the stock m arket. T h e ir happiness
is short-lived, as a rival suitor assassin ates C onsu elos father arid a sn ake bites
R a m i r e z , w ho re-encounters L u cian o w hen rushed to find m ed ical treatm ent
in G uayaquil. Luciano confesses to h is role in M ariana’s d ish on o r d u rin g this
e n c o u n t e r , w h ich inspires Salvad o r’s fin a l realization that h is fr ie n d ’s betrayal
pales before the crush in g codes o f quiteño society.
Both o f these novels displayed m elodram atic tendencies; how ever, th ey also
argued for the Liberal m odernization program ,-as would befit p a rty stalw arts
like A nd rad e an d M artinez. H owever, th e split in the L iberal P a rty follow ing
Plaza’s ascend ancy to the presidency in 1902 drove a wedge into the h eart o f the
movement. A lfa ro ’s coup in 1906 encouraged a brief alliance betw een conserva
tives and placistas, who backed u p risin g s in Cuenca and Loja. T h ese u n lik ely
bedfellows broke ranks in 1907 due to ideological differences an d placista sy m
pathy for the A lfa ro governm ent’s stron g m anagem ent o f p u blic h ealth crises
that year, in clu d in g the outbreak o f bu b o n ic plague and typ h oid on the coast.19
These tu rbu len t tim es fueled a tu rn toward radical p olitical and aesthetic
alternatives am ong students seeking to transcend the obsessive p olem ics o f the
previous gen eratio n s.20 C o n servative seco n d ary students lik e Ja cin to Jijón y
Caamaño an d Ju lio Tobar Donoso, m entored by Archbishop G o n zález Suárez
under the aegis o f the Sociedad E c u a to ria n a de Estudios H istó rico s A m e rica
nos, founded the Centro Católico de O breros as early as 1906 in a bid to build
alliances w ith th e grow ing w orkers’ m ovem en t.21 Socialist-inclin ed U niversity
of Quito stu d en ts sim ultaneously d eveloped ties with the a rtis a n a l Socied ad
Artística e In d u stria l de Pich in ch a (S A IP ), whose leaders stro n g ly endorsed
Plaza’s secu la rist agenda. Bolstered b y deepening anarchist a c tiv ity in G u aya- .
quil, scores o f students and artisan s m arched across Quito on A p r il 2 5 ,19 0 7 , to
challenge the legitim acy o f A lfa ro ’s new governm ent. In a h arb in g er o f a cen
tury o f con flict between the state and th e U niversidad Central,-the m ilita ry met
the m archers in a bloody confrontation th at left three students d ead an d scores
more w ound ed .22
These conflagrations alienated the m o st innovative w riters o f th is era. D is
affected b y w h at C ath y Jrade term s th e “sp iritu al and aesthetic v a c u u m ” left
by declining cap italism and the rise o f p ositivist hegem ony, th ese detractors
sought to tran scen d vitriolic polem ic th rough modernismo, a S p an ish A m erican
aesthetic re v iv a list m ovem ent p erso n ifie d b y José M a rti an d R u b é n D a río .2’
These poets ow ed their public p latfo rm to an im poverished scion o f the O tavalo
creole class n am ed Isaac Barrera, w ho parlayed a scholarship to Q u ito’s conser
vative C olegio de S an Gabriel into a career as essayist. One o f h is pieces, an El
Comercio colu m n published in 1910, p rovid ed a genealogy o f modernismo and also
cemented h is career. His passionate d efen se o f experim ental w ritin g endeared
him to a cadre o f w ealthy creole p oets w hose patronage facilitated th e publica
tion o f a review titled Letras (1912—1914). T h is m agazine published the first verses
154 \ A Phantasm agoric D ysto p ia
o f f i g u r e s lik e A r t u r o B o r ja , H u m b e r t o F ie rr o , E r n e s t o N o b o a y C a a m a ñ o , a n d
M e d a r d o A n g e l S ilv a — a r t i s t s w h o e v o k e d V e r la in e , P o e , B a u d e l a i r e , a n d R i m
b a u d , a l o n g w ith D a r io a n d M a r t i . P o e t r y t u r n e d t o p r a c t i c e a s m e l a n c h o li c
a f t e r n o o n s a t t h e A lc o c e r t a v e r n s o a k e d w ith b e e r a n d a g u a r d ie n t e b l e d in t o e v e
n i n g s a t t h e s w a n k y C lu b P i c h i n c h a . U ltim a t e ly , t h e i r a b u s e o f e t h e r a n d m o r
p h i n e a c c e le r a t e d a s e r ie s o f e a r l y d e m i s e s t h a t h a v e le d t o t h i s g r o u p ’s m o n i k e r
a s t h e gen eració n decap itada . T h i s m e l a n c h o l i a is p e r h a p s b e s t c o m m u n i c a t e d b y
E r n e s t o N o b o a y C a a m a ñ o ’s “ H a s t i o ” ( T e d iu m ):
D e s p it e t h e i r im p lic it c a s t i g a t i o n o f Q u i t o ’s l a n d s c a p e , N o b o a a n d h is fe llo w
“ d e c a p i t a t e d ” p o e t s l o c a t e d t h e s e n t i m e n t o f p a r a ly s i s a n d a p o r i a a s a c o n t i n u a l
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f m o d e r n l i f e w it h o n l y a m i n i m a l s p a t i a l r e f e r e n t . H o w e v e r,
th e lo n e n o v e l a s s o c i a t e d w it h t h i s m o v e m e n t , J o s é R a f a e l B u s t a m a n t e s P a ra
m a ta r el gu san o (1913), e v o k e s a n d s u b v e r t s t h e p o s i t i v i s t p a r a d i g m s e s t a b l i s h e d
b y M e r a , A n d r a d e , a n d M a r t i n e z t o c r e a t e a c a r t o g r a p h y o f d eca p ita d o e n n u i.
P u b l i s h e d s e r ia lly in L etras, t h e w o r k r e v i s i t s th e c o n s t r i c t i v e id y llic p a r a d i g m o f
th e l i b e r a l n o v e ls o f th e t u r n o f t h e c e n t u r y y e t e c h o e s t h e m o d e rn ista i m a g e o f
t h e c i t y a s a c a g e o f le c h e r y a n d d e b a u c h e r y .25 U n li k e i t s d e p i c t i o n in p r e v io u s
E c u a d o r i a n n o v e ls, th e c o u n t r y s i d e , i n B u s t a m a n t e ’s v ie w , h a d l o s t i t s r e d e m p
tiv e p o t e n t i a l a n d i n s t e a d h a d b e g u n t o c o n f o r m t o t h e i n c a p a c i t a t i n g p a r a ly s is
o f t h e e n c r o a c h in g m o d e r n c ity .
B u s t a m a n t e r e a liz e s t h i s c r i t i q u e t h r o u g h s p a t i a l l y c h a r g e d n a r r a t i v e s in t e r
r o g a t i n g t h e r e la tio n s h ip b e t w e e n t h e m e t r o p o li s a n d i t s h i n t e r l a n d . T h e f ir s t
n a r r a t i v e c o n c e r n s a lo v e t r i a n g l e b e tw e e n a r c h e t y p e s — t h e u r b a n e lite (Jo rg e ),
t h e p o o r y o u th (R o b e r t o ), a n d t h e s i m p l e c o u n t r y g i r l ( I n é s ) — t h a t c o n t r a s t s
u r b a n d e c a d e n c e w ith p a s t o r a l p u r i t y . In a c i r c u i t o u s a n d p r e d i c t a b l e p lo t , th e
t i m i d R o b e r t o f a lls fo r I n é s , w h o is in t u r n s e d u c e d b y w e a l t h y J o r g e ’s v ita lity .
H e r f ir s t lo v e r le a r n s o f h e r b e t r a y a l f r o m a n e ig h b o r a n d t h e n f a l l s i n t o a c y c le
o f d r i n k a n d d e s p e r a tio n t h a t e v e n t u a l l y le a d s to h i s d i s s o l u t i o n : h e b e c o m e s a
b e g g a r liv in g in th e i r o n ic a lly t i t l e d Q u e b r a d a J e r u s a l é n , t h e p o l l u t e d r a v in e o n
t h e s o u t h e r n e d g e o f t h e c ity .
R o b e r t o a t t e m p t s t o e s c a p e Q u i t o ’s c lu tc h e s t h r o u g h a s e r i e s o f m o v e s f r o m
o n e d w e llin g t o a n o t h e r — d w e l l i n g s t h a t p a r a ll e l h i s m e n t a l s t a t e , d o c u m e n t
t h e c i t y ’s m o d e r n iz in g p a t h , a n d r e v e a l t h e c l a s s b i a s e s o f m u n i c i p a l a n d s t a t e
p l a n n i n g m e a s u r e s .26 A s a c h i l d , h e a n d h i s m o t h e r , R o s a , liv e in a c r u m b l i n g
c o l o n i a l in s q u a lid S a n M a r c o s . S o o n a f t e r h e m e e t s J o r g e a n d I n é s , R o s a m o v e s
to a m o d e r n h o m e w ith a g a r d e n in t h e b u r g e o n in g m i d d l e - c l a s s n e ig h b o r h o o d
A Phantasmagoric Dystopia / 155
The s h ifty and solitary alley rises, hides and disappears into the austere h ill, flee
ing from the m istreatment it h as suffered as it exits the city to becom e a heap o f
dung a n d rubbish. A tired and repu gnant corridor between the cem etery and two
or three low and melancholic huts that are h a lf paved with uneven cobblestones
riddled w ith soapy water flowing from the nearby homes and h a lf in d irt, weeds,
trash a n d excrem ent. And there w e see a m an, a ghost, a specter that sleeps and
dream s, grum bles and babbles, scratches his fleas and lice, sitting on the thresh
old o f a closed door. For such a street, such a m an .27
Like the alley, Roberto has been co n su m ed by his fellow m an , a hopeless ghost
of his fo rm e r self, trapped in a d esp erate cycle o f filth and ru b b ish . A m an de
filed by h is environm ent.
B u stam an te, unlike his lib e ra l forebears, interrogates the p o sitiv ist para
digm b y d ep lo y in g signs o f progress as signifiers o f internal d isru p tio n at key
points in th e novel. One m otive d em onstrating this effort concerns the changing
standards in public nocturnal ligh tin g. For instance, while trad itio n al candle-lit
streets are rem arked in early p assages in the book, Roberto’s en cou n ter w ith a
lurid kerosene lam p occurs just a fte r he discovers the potential lia iso n between
Ines and Jorge. Sim ilarly, it is b y th e ligh t o f the new electric streetlam ps years
later that he glim pses her betrayal. A second exam ple can be seen in the m eta
phor o f m od ernization’s vacuity. T h is them e dom inates the closin g pages o f the
book, w hen the old beggar R o b erto h app en s upon his ch ild h o o d hom e in San
Marcos. L ik e so m uch o f Quito, it h as received a m odernizing fa c e -lift that con
ceals a com pletely unchanged interior. T he anciano (old m an) collapses before
the realization th at his happiest m em ories are o f a despicable h ovel th at betrays
the un scath ed idyll, despite his lifelo n g turm oil and steady d estru ctio n .
This com bination o f the liberal im age o f Quito as backw ater w ith a critique
of m od ernization’s uneven reach is b o th the cause and result o f B u stam an te’s
essentially nostalgic understanding o f the contemporary world. Y e t th is is not a
nostalgia th a t seeks to restore a p ast w orld but instead uses R o b e rto ’s search to
comment u p o n the uneven results o f progress. Indeed, B u stam an te’s interroga
1
156 \ A Phantasmagoric Dystopia
tion notes more th an the decadence o f m od ern ity. H is protagonist’s tru e flaw is
his idealism , identified as an anachronism in contem p orary quiteño society, for
Roberto is no vecino o f th is dystopic city or o f th e m odern world.
Bustam ante’s d esp airin g condem nation, w h ile reflective o f the broad er mo
dernista antipathy to p o sitivist m odels, a lso an ticip ated two fu tu re trends
in literary portraiture o f the capital. T he first, largely restricted to th e 1920s,
w o uld explore a h ed o n istic and su rrealist c ity sc a p e rooted in th e grotesque
descriptions o f R o b erto ’s fin al days. T his critiq u e originated w ith in a cadre of
vangu ardists asso ciated w ith two reviews— Caricatura (1919—1922) a n d Hélice
(1926)— that echoed an d reconsidered the D a d a ist and surrealist tren d s then
in vogue in Europe. A u th o rs such as A lb erto C o lo m a Silva, Pablo Palacio, and
H um berto Salvador cra fte d a vision o f a b a n a l c ity oscillating betw een its per
p etual insularity and a desire for cosm opolitan centrality, a representation sup
ported by the disjo in ted structure o f their w ritin g s. T he work o f the latter two
w riters dovetailed w ith intense social c ritic ism , a characteristic ty p ic a l o f the
indigenista and so cialist critiques o f E cu ad o rian social relations o f the 1930s.
Vanguard Dreams
Antonio Cam pos in G u ayaq u il, in Gangotena’s Q uito, the ram bunctious antics
c o m e to a close, order is resto red, and the idyll e n d u re s.29 For exam ple, in “ L a
virgen de la em panada,” G an go ten a relates the story o f a colonial official w ith a
mania for the occult who discovers an image o f the V irg in M a ry in a spot o f lard
on the wrapper o f his em p anad a one m orning. His a m u se d neighbors encourage
his devotion to the m iracle— w hich is placed in a venerated u rn — until fin ally a
prankster burns the rotting parchm ent and restores order.30
Whereas Gangotena firm ly located the idyllic c ity in the colonial past, the
guided tours com piled by h is liberal colleague A leja n d ro A n d rad e Coello and
published regularly in El Comercio as “Cronicas de Q u ito ” offer a w indow onto
the past from the perspective o f the contem porary city. In these vignettes, A n
drade ambulates through th e old center until a “ch an ce” encounter with a site o f
memory initiates a digression to docum ent the h isto rical im portance o f m on u
mental churches, to recite a co lo rfu l legend, or to explore a personal m em ory.
These reminiscences becom e m ore com m on in his later colu m n s, as do a series
of ludic characters from “ the old Quito, gone and never to retu rn .” 31 A s in G a n
gotena’s writings, these ro g u e s—-a one-man band, a b lin d aguador (water c a r
rier) who answered insults in verse, a cross-dressing m estizo who deceived th e
city’s well-to-do into en tru stin g their daughters to h is care— not only decorate a
bleak landscape but also provid e an essential social fu n ctio n b y helping the city
to overcome regret w ith laughter.33
One o f the crucial elem ents o f these chronicles con cerns their setting, w hich
focuses on the picturesque neighborhoods o f the colo n ial center. Public spaces
such as the Plaza San F ran cisco and the Plaza de la In dependencia app ear as
markers o f heroism and c ivility , while streets such as th e in fam o u s La R o n d a,
home o f m any n in eteen th -cen tu ry poets, becom e th o se enchanting, “ b a d ly
paved streets, narrow and d a rk , but rich in m em o ries.” 53 U n lik e in B arrera’s
holistic centennial essay, these chronicles purge the new er d istricts that serve
as foils to the worthy stru ctu res o f the centro. T h u s, arch itectu re and tradition
form a unified front again st m odernization. In deed, in A n d ra d e ’s account o f
Quito’s colonial churches, he even im agines the u n sp eak ab le pains o f previous
generations (“recondito dolor de nuestros abuelos” ) w itn essin g the d isap p ear
ance o f the artistic relics o f ancient Quito.34
W hereas the Liberal cau se h ad at one time garn ered the support o f Q u ito’s
radical fringe, these stale n o stalgic pieces fru strated a new generation o f van -
guardists who considered Q u ito ’s sanctification to b e an absurdity. T h eir c r i
tique found expression in an expand ing culture o f indepen dently produced liter
ary m agazines. A s H um berto R obles has argued, these new reviews represented
a national phenomenon b u t were particularly active in Q uito, Loja, C uenca, an d
Guayaquil due to the universities in those areas. In Q uito, the Escuela de B ellas
Artes also proved an incub ator for avant-garde art stu d ents inspired b y the b irth
of m odernist trends in Europe, the United States, an d , increasingly, M exico. Far
158 \ A Phantasmagoric Dystopia
Je . CH /To^l da V
er) Vlftvdi vq/Tbt-K,
Fig. 6.1. G uillerm o Latorre, “ N uestros historiógrafos. Sr. de G an gotena de C ristóbal de Jijó n
de— ExC ónsul en V lad ivo sto k ,” Caricatura 2:57 (F eb ru ary 2 9 ,19 2 0 ). C ourtesy Banco C e n tra l del
Ecuador.
from simply com m unicating foreign m ovem ents, however, these collectives de
veloped a critical art, caricature, and satire th at interrogated the ongoing liberal
hegemony with an increasingly radical van gu ard ist position.”
The first o f these new collectives coalesced aro u n d a satirical review nam ed
Caricatura, which was founded by art students in 1918 and would prove p op u lar
enough with the c ity ’s progressive fringe to ap p ear m onthly for the n ext three
years. Its popularity stem m ed not only from its attention to reporting cu rren t
literary and artistic trends but also its lam p oo n in g o f local notables, as in G u ill-
A Phantasm agoric Dystopia / 159
e r m c Latorre’s portrait o f C ristó b a l Gangotena (fig. 6 .1) .36 Besides these carica
tures, the m agazine inclu d ed a series o f incisive parodies b y A lb e rto Colom a
Silva, an art student at th e E scu e la de Bellas A rtes who w o u ld prove a direct
in flu e n c e on future iterations o f the phantasm agorical chronotope.
C olom a’s p rim ary literary contribution to the m agazine consisted o f a col
um n titled “Crónicas de Q u ito,” w ritten under the p seu d onym R am iro de Sylva,
that appeared before he w on a scholarship to study p ainting in France and Spain
in 1920.37 These chronicles tu rn th e universal ethos into an in tern al critique as
Don R am iro lam poons the pretension s o f an isolated A n d e a n h am let despite
its un iversal desires. C o lo m a’s in au g u ral colum n, for in stan ce, features Don
Ram iro’s doomed search fo r am u sem ent in a fu nd am en tally m undan e cityscape
considered poetic by in su ffe ra b le rom antics unaw are o f contem p orary condi
tions. In deed, Colom a's a lter ego encounters a preening hombre de talento (an
intellectual or bohem ian), w h ose pom posity brings a ch uckle to the chronicler
as he realizes that the m an ’s risib le visage is as absurd as h is ow n.1* In a later
colum n, Don R am iro explores th e city streets searching fo r som e newsworthy
scandal, perhaps a crim e. In ste a d , he finds little o f note, o n ly p riests gesticu
lating w ith their cigarettes, a fittin g at the tailor’s, and a frie n d ’s car splashing
through a pothole. A t hom e, faced w ith the blank page, he lam ents the need to
invent the grotesque in order to sa tisfy his own and the p u b lic’s yearn ing for the
sensational.” S im ilar jo c u la rity appears in a piece u n d er th e bylin e o f Henry
Nick (most likely also Colom a) th at scoffs at the Junta del C entenario s attempts
to fill in potholes b y em p h asizin g the potent sunshine o f the S h y ri capital that
dries the pooled rainwater b e tter th an any paving efforts c o u ld .40
C olom a and h is Caricatura collaborators largely avoided explicit political
posturing. The traum a o f th e 1 9 2 2 G uayaquil m assacre and the trium phant 1925
Julian Revolution, however, recast the struggle over Q uito’s idyllic landscape as
part o f a national and in tern atio n al class conflict. A fte r C o lom a m oved to Eu
rope to stud y painting, a new collective sought an appropriate response. Led by
essayist R aúl A ndrade and indigenista painter Cam ilo Egas, the cohort included
Caricatura veterans Carlos A n d ra d e (Kanela) and G u ille rm o Latorre, the poet
Gonzalo Escudero, and a y o u n g law student recently arrived fro m Loja named
Pablo Palacio, who would becom e one o f the foremost E cu ad o rian authors o f the
twentieth century.41
Propelled b y Egas, the collective began publishing a new review nam ed Hé
lice in 1926. The publication engaged the implosion launched b y T ristan Tzara’s
Dadaist proclam ations bu t, in stea d o f abandoning art altogether, sought to find
a new fo rm al language to c ritiq u e the European fascin ation w ith exotic indi-
geneity that Egas had b egu n e x p lo rin g during an earlier sojou rn in the City of
Light.42 A s Escudero put it in th e opening editorial to the first issue, “We under
stand th at the A rt is the a lc h e m y o f the im probability, becau se i f the A rt was
true, the artistic expression w o u ld not exist.” Modernismo w as dead; instead,
i6o \ A Phantasmagoric Dystopia
Fig. 6.2. G u illerm o L atorre, cover for Pablo P ala cio ’s novel Debora (1927). C o u rte sy L ib ra ry o f
Congress.
humor that d ro ve R abelais, in Palacio, glu tto n y loom s ever present an d there
are only “c h e e rfu l deaths.”'17
Palacio’s su rre a list abstraction reached its pinnacle in his cu bistic 1927 novel
Debora, which incorporates greater attention to social conditions in flected b y his
burgeoning investm en t in socialism .48 T h e novel presents a fragm en ted account
of a day in the life o f a superfluous m an k n o w n only as the Teniente, or Lieu ten
ant. The book d em an d s a new form al conception o f the city as it satirizes the
nostalgic c ircu its o f an Andrade C oello or Gangotena. Instead o f rom antic tales
of yore, the T en ien te’s stroll reveals a vicio u s landscape where progress is under
attack by the e xcu ses o f the reactionary gemebundos (howlers). T h ere is n o point
i 62 \ A Phantasmagoric D ystopia
Fig. 6.3. K an ela. back cover art fo r D ébora. C ou rtesy Library o f C o n g re ss.
to su c h rom anticism , co n sid e rin g the te rrify in g state o f the poor. And even
w h en m em ory does in tru d e, it is o f a dystopic m om en t, fa r rem oved from the
p ictu resq u e and frivolous, th a t causes the Teniente to retreat into his dreams.
T h e first edition o f Débora p aired Palacio’s h a llu c in a to ry prose with prints
b y h is com rades from Hélice, G u ille rm o Latorre an d K a n e la , which introduced
th e T e n ie n te s Janus-faced w o rld . T h e cover featured L a to rre’s vision (fig. 6.2),
w h ich centers on the d ise m b o d ie d m ilitary figure w h o se face nuzzles into a
w o m a n ’s thigh, just below h er n aked buttocks. Slices o f the c ity form his coat,
fro m L a Ronda’s picturesque hom es to the m ountains above. O ther images from
th e sto ry shuffle about h im , in clu d in g money, stam p s, b o ots, and the number
57, h is address. On the back cover is Kanela’s interpretation o f the story (fig. 6.3).
N o w the Teniente appears as th e m arionette G u ig n o l, a p o p u lar nineteenth-
c e n tu ry French puppet sh ow an d also the to ngue-in-ch eek nam esake for the
A Phantasmagoric D ystopia / 163
fore a lon g flight o f steps that trig g ers a m em ory o f the d oo r above; it opens onto
a room o f filth and muck where h e once satisfied his ca rn a l lu st, and all the while
he is reflectin g on the trap th at th e scene represents for the children he hears in
the n e x t room , as from the s lu m s com e only thieves an d prostitutes. With this
m em ory, h is paralysis d isap p ears, he retu rns hom e, he w rap s h is m ind around
the e arlier seduction o f his la n d la d y ’s daughter, who m ay or m ay not be preg
n an t, an d finally begins a d re a m o f frustrated love.54 T h e novel abruptly ends.
Debora s radical reth inkin g o f th e colonial cityscape recalls the frustrations
o f R o b erto ’s search to escape Q u ito ’s confines in B u stam an te’s Para matar el gu-
sano, ye t it painstakingly avoid s lettin g the reader id e n tify w ith the cause o f the
protagonist. Indeed, there is n o la stin g cause, rom antic im p u lse, or even desire;
the T en ien te’s supposed m u se n ever appears, and one encounters his thoughts
m erely as a m eans to survive a contam inated environm ent. T h is is no nihilistic
representation per se, as P alacio situ ates the source o f th is con flict in the social
relatio n s represented by the n ig h tm arish tour throu gh th e centro— a stance in
con cert w ith his burgeoning s o c ia list philosophy. He w o u ld later expand this
con sideration in his last n o ve l, V ida del ahorcado (1932), w h ich condem ns the
bo u rgeois im pulse by tracing th e tentacles o f its violence again st hum anity and
natu re. A trial o f the bou rgeois b y the violated forest, n atu re itself, fram es the
co n flic t even as it foreshadow s th e possibility o f recon ciliatio n in an alternate
social web.55
A com plem ent to P a la cio s p essim ism can be foun d in the sim ilarly fantasti
cal experim ents o f his so cia list colleague, H um berto Salvad or. Born in Guaya
q u il in 1909, Salvador m igrated to Q uito following the loss o f h is parents when
he w as a young child. He s tu d ie d literature at the M ejia , where he also began
w ritin g fiction strongly in flu e n ced b y the French “m aestro s” such as Stendhal,
F lau b ert, Gide, and B alzac.56 H is first stories appeared in 1925 in Claridad, the
sem i-official magazine o f th e Ju lia n governm ent, and w ere follow ed by contri
b u tio n s to the radical student review L lamaradda a fter he b egan studying law at
th e U niversidad Central in 1927. M od ern dram a, p a rtic u la rly Pirandello’s Six
Characters in Search of an A u thor (1921), both in sp ired h is production o f prize-
w in n in g plays, published as fa r afield as A rgentina, and a lso heavily influenced
the stories collected in Ajedrez a n d h is novel En la ciudad he perdido una novela
(both published in 1929). E x p a n d in g Palacios earlier c ritiq u e, Salvador’s writ
in gs illu strate a frenetic a n d fragm en ted Q uito d o m in a ted b y pulsating en
cou n ters between m o d e rn ity ’s recklessn ess and the fru s tra tin g endurance of
tradition .
H is early works— he w o u ld later try his hand at so cia l realism — represent
th e first local acceptance o f th e paradoxical im pulses o f m od ern life. A n obses
sion w ith psychological d e v ia n c e tinged w ith clin ical c u rio sity pervades these
pieces, a scenario that W ilfrid o C o rra l has linked to S a lv a d o r’s own studies in
F reu d ia n theory.57 A tale lik e “ E l am ante de las m a n o s,” fo r instance, recalls
P a la cio ’s “ El antropofago,” g iv e n its eventual d evolu tion in to a ritualistic de
A Phantasmagoric D ystopia / 165
vouring o f a lover’s hands. Salvador, how ever, painstakingly recreates the steps
of this deterioration into m adness, avo id in g the dependence on the su d den rev
elation ty p ic a l o f Palacio’s narrative. T h e potential in tru sion o f in sa n ity into
a quotidian m om en t appears again in “ L a navaja,” in w hich a n arrator, bored
with the m u n d an e discussions in the barbershop, d aydream s th at h is barber
metamorphoses into a homicidal m an iac. T h is fantasy appears lu d icro u s (“¡C a
ramba! ¿Realidad? N o; ilusión”), but it is also addictive.58 The b o h em ian narrator
follows the th ough t to its finish— a h a llu cin a tio n o f his own d eath — attracted
by a horror laced w ith uncertainty.
Salvador, m oreover, attributes a m o d e rn sen sibility to te ch n o lo g y th at
ruptures the veneer o f tradition and q u ietu d e that obscures the stiflin g forces
of capitalism . T h e barber’s clock in “ L a n avaja,” for instance, belongs to a con
sortium o f contem porary timepieces sen sitive to the avant-garde’s d isg u st with
a Fordist m en ta lity: “ They do not resign them selves to the v u lg a rity o f being
exact.”59 In “ L a s linternas de los autos,” th e c ity ’s nightlife is d escribed fro m the
perspective o f a c a r’s headlights, those “ojos de la noche” that ob serve d epravity
under darkn ess, fro m prostitution to th e ft and m urder. A s w itn ess sim u ltan e
ously to bourgeois excess and m od ern ity’s “escenarios movibles” (m ovable stages)
life has no secrets for the “sabia linterna” (wise lantern).
The trope o f lucid personification re tu rn s in Salvador’s b est-know n treat
ment o f the fan ta stica l city, his 1929 novel En la ciudad he perdido una novela. In
this work, w hich focuses on a fictional a u th o r’s attem pt to create characters that
refuse his auto cratic m inistrations, Q u ito ’s neighborhoods, salo n s, cin em as,
and tram lines app ear as archetypal p erso n alities, which he term s subpersonajes.
For Salvador’s narrator, these “su b ch aracters” conspire w ith th e city to o b fu s
cate the spaces identified with m ain p layers such as the refined Jo se fin a and
the nihilist C arlo s, a process that hides th ese characters’ in d ivid u ality fro m the
authorial h unt. Salvad or’s narrator lam en ts this situation in h is d escription o f
his elusive m use, V ictoria: “I’ll begin b y locatin g her. L ocatin g a perso n in the
classic city o f S a n Francisco de Q uito proves m ore difficult, even, th an d ivin in g
a friend’s card s d u rin g a high-stakes gam e o f chance. She escapes. In order to
catch up, one m u st desperately ru n th ro u gh the streets. Fortunately, the paved
roads are less p a in fu l than the sid ew alk ; however, when one reaches cobble
stones the ch ase becom es dolorous. You m u st quit. The ch aracter th us escapes
and not even th e D evil could find her.” 60 In this passage, Salvad o r deconstru cts
several o f the u su a l visions o f idyllic Q u ito, which obscures its ch aracters by
virtue o f its ow n evasive yet classic ch aracter. Jaundiced reality in tru d es for the
pursuer as he traipses across the city streets, where the a sp h a lt’s y ie ld provides
pyrrhic relief for an author encum bered b y a rigid cobblestone not even the devil
himself could weather.
The quest is com pulsive, and so th e author searches fo r V ic to ria ’s hom e,
turning now to the popular neighborhood o f El Tejar, lam en tab ly yet another
barrio lleno de piedras” (barrio fu ll o f stones) on Pichincha’s u p p e r slopes. In
i66 \ A Phantasmagoric D ystopia
a spo t riddled in legend an d m em ory, Salvador retreats for an instant into the
lo yal transcription o f an old-fashioned chronicler. H ow ever, he rejects the a n o
d yn e for m alicious w itches, a widow possessed b y a d ev il, and a m ultitu d e o f
d w arfs whose spirits on ly recen tly capitulated to th e assau lt o f electricity that
app eared w ith the suddenness o f an Apache’s attack in an A m erican w estern .61
A n d yet tradition holds fa st, h eld tightly by “casas coloniales, madres del pecado”
(colonial houses, m others o f sin), including the n eighborhood church, “ la se
ñora del barrio,” under w hose shadow the locals d rin k flavors o f the past such as
aguardiente and chicha de jora (corn beer).
A fte r El Tejar, the pace accelerates. The resurgent ghosts shield V ictoria on
h er w ay to a salon, then d isap p ear as she leaps into a n automobile speeding to
w ard the Edén cinem a, w here the slapstick film s o f C h arlie Chaplin and B uster
K eaton regale the fa ith fu l crow d. Inside the theater, we encounter the rom antic
m alcontent Carlos, w h om V icto ria cannot stan d , a n d so she vanishes again ,
g ivin g way to a new m use: th e wealthy Josefina. A resident o f one o f the lu x u ri
ou s chalets on the n o rth ern edges o f town, Josefin a gives the author even m ore
troub le since she never w a lk s anywhere, on ly ta k in g tram s and autom obiles
speeding past the A la m e d a and Ejido parks on her w a y to the im pressionist can
vas o f her garden. Even h er m an sion, in its gran d opulence where the w indow s
are “ fram es for the cu bist nu d e o f voluptuousness” scoffs at the lowly a rtist.62
A s the novel contin ues its episodic m ean d erin g through a crowd o f new
ch aracters and subch aracters, the author even tu ally com es to realize the fu til
ity o f his attem pt at com prehensive knowledge. Q u ito cannot be understood
through a single character, a single building, a single neighborhood. The capsule
o f the chronicle thus is revealed as presum ptuous, fo r on ly in the collection o f
fragm en ts can one brin g the city to light. The realizatio n is stark but prom ising
fo r the vanguard, who alon e understands this reality :
Q uito’s attack on his novel thus stems from its v e ry character as a m odern city:
a schizophrenic land scap e w hose essence cannot b e know n except by pastiche.
T h e city thus hid w ith in its paradox a P ira n d e llia n character th w artin g at
tem pts to know its natu re yet offering up tan talizin g glim pses o f clearly defined
in d ivid u al neighborhoods, w hose very clarity is a lso illusory. Such a d efinition
rup tu red the conventional view o f Quito as a site e a sily illum ined by the insight
A Phantasmagoric Dystopia / 167
Salvad o r’s and Palacios su rrealistic w ritings raised the ire o f their fellow So
cialist P arty m em bers. A critical m om ent came in 1930, w hen a group o f writers
from G u ayaq u il published Los que se van, a collection o f tales highlighting the
b ru tality o f life in the rolling h ills o f the coastal plateau. T h e b o o k ’s coauthors,
D em etrio A guilera M alta, Jo a q u in G allegos Lara, and E n riqu e G il G ilbert, fol
lowed u p its publication w ith c a lls for a socially conscious n ation al literature.
G allegos Lara, in particular, em braced the task o f exalting socialism in a series
o f essays published in 1931 an d 1932 that form ulated a com prehensive critique
o f recent avant-garde activity as a nativist extension o f bourgeois mentality. He
singled out Salvador’s En la ciudad he perdido una novela as a trite exam ple of for
m alism , instead advocating a literature featuring the n ation ’s ru ral and urban
poor. M anifestos abounded in th e leftist press as editorial pages clam ored to an
swer G alleg o s’s challenge, w ith even the “ decadent” Salvad o r tu rn in g his back
on his previous w ork.64 T h is en ergy in fu sed the intellectual elite and propelled
a literary renaissance that yie ld ed som e o f Ecuador’s best-know n fiction o f the
tw entieth century, includin g Jorge Icaza’s indigenista novel Huasipungo (1934),
José de la C u a d ra s forerun n er to m agical realism , Los Sangurim as (1934), and
Dem etrio A gu ilera M alta’s Don Goyo (1933). Their heroes included the oppressed
Indian, the verbose and violent montubio (literally, a resident o f the A ndean foot
hills; figuratively, a country b u m p k in ), and the colloquial A fro-E cu ad o rian .
T h ese novels drew upon a len gth y intellectual h istory reaching back to Juan
León M era but were m ost im m ed ia tely influenced by Loja attorney Pío Jara
m illo A lva ra d o ’s exploration o f pre-C olum bian history. Ja ra m illo ’s El indio ecu
atoriano (1922) sim ultaneously laud ed a noble indigenous tradition going back to
the legen dary pre-Incaic K in gd o m o f Q uito while arguing for a contemporary
alliance between indigenous com m u n ities and the S o cia list Party. Jaram illo’s
writings helped accelerate ru ra l p olitical activism and a lso fostered literary ex
ploration o f these ideas, b egin n in g w ith Fernando Chaves’s Plata y bronce (1927),
whose em phasis on the corru p tio n o f priests and hacendados presaged the onset
of social realism .65 M ost expon ents o f this new indigenismo located their writings
in the countryside in order to dem onstrate the exploitative relations o f a no lon
ger vacuou s hinterland. T h is is not to say, however, that the city disappears from
the social realist novel. Indeed, Federico Chalupa has com m ented on the import
o f the capital as the space “associated with the white elite” in no less a work than
Icaza’s Huasipungo, a scathing rebuke o f life on an A n d ean hacienda and gener
ally regarded as the forem ost exam ple o f the indigenist m ovem ent. It is in Quito,
i68 \ A Phantasmagoric D ystopia
however, that Don A lfonso Pereira brokers a deal w ith th e grin go M r. Chappy
to b u ild a highway through a n indigenous co m m u n ity’s sm a ll plots know n as
huasipungos. It is the city’s scan dalm on gers whom Pereira flees upon learning o f
his daughter’s illegitimate pregnancy. A n d from Q uito com es the regim ent that
suppresses an indigenous in su rrectio n in the work's clim ac tic scene.66
The framework developed b y Icaza and his colleagues echoed the vitupera
tive castigation o f the city ty p ic a l o f the polem ical w ritin g at the tu rn o f the
tw entieth century as well as o f contem porary so cio lo g ical an d psychological
thought. Particularly in flu e n tia l in the E cu ado rian c o n te x t were José Carlos
M ariátegu i’s agrarian so c ia lism , w ith its em phasis on th e u rb an origins o f ru
ral poverty, along with the re fo rm ist pedagogy o f th e M ex ic an revolutionary
governm ent.67 While Hélice h a d prom ulgated R ivera’s w ork in 1926 to general
indifference, the visit o f M e x ic a n educator M oisés S á e n z in 1931, as p art o f a
regional tour designed to in vestigate the conditions o f S o u th A m erican indig
enous groups, proved m ore in flu e n tial. Sáenz’s co n tacts w ith figures like Jara-
m illo A lvarado and Chaves in flu en ced his encyclopedic Sobre el indio ecuatoriano
(1933); its treatment of the h a rd sh ip s o f rural life e x p a n d ed Jaram illo’s research
and foreshadowed the advent o f social realist literatu re.68 S áen z’s call for a more
responsible pedagogy an d a com prehensive sociological stu d y o f the plight of
the Ecuadorian Indian en couraged fu rth er academ ic stu d y. O f particular rel
evance for the social realist n o vel were the studies o f u rb a n and periurban pov
erty conducted in the suburbios b y Dr. Pablo A rtu ro S u árez o f the Universidad
C entral in the early 1930s. S u á re z ’s subsequent sta tistic a l an d qualitative por
trait o f these slums published in 1934 provided a w ealth o f inform ation m ined
by authors such as Icaza and H u m berto Salvador as th e y created a denunciatory
urban literature.69
The second integral elem en t o f works such as Ic a z a ’s En las calles (1935) and
Salvad or’s socialist fiction w as the incorporation o f a Freu d ian concern with
sexual deviance. For both au th o rs, this inflection in th e ir work stem m ed par
tially from their university stu d ies; Icaza had at one tim e b een a m edical student
before turning to the theater, w h ile Salvador’s th esis, “ E squem a sexu al” (Uni
versidad Central, 1933), represen ted the first com preh en sive Spanish-language
survey o f the role o f se x u a lity in contem porary p sy ch o lo g ica l theory.70 Salva
dor’s studies o f Freud, Ju ng, an d Soviet theorist A le x a n d ra Kollontai formed the
basis for his portrayal o f the so cial origins o f sexual tran sgression in subsequent
novels.71 These referents a lso h ea vily influenced Ic a z a , p articu la rly in his early
dram a, which emphasized th e cau sal relationship b etw een environm ent, sexual
repression, and perversion.
Icaza’s plays turn upon a sense o f m oral am b iguity stem m in g from the social
conditions in which his ch aracters exist— conditions in w hich violence results
from environmental con d itio n s rather than a p erso n ’s existen tial choices. For
exam ple, “ Como ellos q u ieren ” (1930) exam ines the w a rp in g o f the lust felt by
Lucrecia, a young provin cial girl studying in Q uito, w h o se liaisons with a poor
A Phantasmagoric D ystopia / 169
lover are c u rta ile d b y her father’s fa m ily . Besotted by n eu rasth en ia and an ac
companying h ysteric disorder, she bites h er uncle’s cheek and attem pts to stran
gle her cousin before choosing the “ in d epen d en t” life o f a prostitute.72 Sim ilarly,
“¿Cuál es?” featu res an oedipal crisis as tw o brothers (Hijo 1 an d H ijo 2) fantasize
about k illin g th e ir philandering d ru n k o f a father whose exploits have caused
their m other to contract a venereal disease. W hen he is finally m urdered, neither
brother is c e rta in who inflicted the fa ta l k n ife wound, even as the m em bers o f
the com m un ity (and their mother) rem ain certain it was H ijo 1 becau se he had
publicly railed against the patriarch— yet another score for the quiteño gossips.7’
Icaza p a r tia lly abandons the a m b ig u ity o f these early e xp erim en ts in the
societal in d ictm en t o f Huasipungo, w here sex stands revealed as an abusive curse
besotting th e indigen ous wom en o f th e C uchitam bo h acien d a. A cen tral se
quence delineates the social origins o f these conflicts by tracing the adventures
of Don A lfo n s o Pereira. A fter being aw akened from slum ber b y the shouts o f
his workers attem p ting to save the crip p le A ndres Chiliquinga fro m stam peding
cattle, Pereira rapes Chiliquinga’s w ife C u n sh i, who is acting as wet nurse to his
son. She is su m m a rily returned to C h iliq u in g a ’s choza the fo llo w in g day, lead
ing the crip p le to wonder what m ay h ave occurred. Cunshi n ever sp eak s— after
all, her attack er was the boss, who cou ld do what he w ould in h is d om in ion .”
Pereira’s lech ero u s escapades contin ue th e next evening in d ru n k e n cavorting
with the p arish priest. Their carou sing ends with first Pereira and then the cleric
consorting w ith the housekeeper, Ju a n a , who tellingly echoes C u n s h i’s exculpa
tion o f the m aster w ithin a m oral com pass. A s she puts it (in an internal m on o
logue), sex w ith Pereira represents o n ly a potential sin whereas, “w ith the priest,
it wasn’t a sin .” Nevertheless, when h er youngest son observes her retu rn to her
quarters, ad ju stin g her blouse, his g aze fills her with the deepest sham e.74
The violence against women presages the escalation o f Pereira’s oppression,
which u ltim ately leads to a futile in su rrectio n among the In dian s o f C uchitam bo
that is suppressed by'soldiers arrivin g fro m the capital. T h is event foreshadow s
the central co n flicts o f Icaza’s next novel, En las callesP Like its predecessor, this
work features a dom ineering hacendado— Don Luis A nton io U rrestes— whose
political an d econom ic power strad d les the urban and ru ra l realm s. T h e pro
tagonists are tw o cholos, or m estizos, n a m ed Ram ón Landeta and José M an uel
Játiva, who flee th e ham let o f C h a g u a rp a ta after Urrestes encroaches on their
water rights. T h e novel follows th eir jo u rn e y to Quito, where th ey jo in the toil
ing m asses, L a n d eta as a porter at a fa c to ry owned, ironically, b y U rrestes, and
Játiva as a p olice officer. W hile Icaza dem arcates the transform ative experiences
each suffers, th e n o vel’s clim actic recou n tin g o f a riot reveals a n enveloping and
tragic social structure.
Icaza’s treatm en t o f Landeta’s accu ltu ration to the facto ry evokes h is early
drama as w ell as the liberal idyll. T h e cholo quickly gains th e tru st o f h is su
periors for h is fa ith fu l service. In th e factory, he also m eets th e h ard w orkin g
and com ely C la u d in a , who supports h er d ru nken father. In a nod to th e them e
170 \ A Phantasm agoric Dystopia
o f pastoral lib eratio n in m an y early lib eral novels, the two frequ en t th e nearby
eucalyptus forests, whose lum ber feeds th e sm okestacks; these lia iso n s lead to
C laudina’s p re g n a n cy and a confrontation w ith h er father. A lth o u gh she is able
to w ithstand h er fath er s inebriated w ra th , the couple’s joy ends w h en m anage
m ent forbids a u n ion ization drive, which lead s C laudina to join h er coworkers in
storm ing the facto ry. Landeta, still g u a rd in g the gates, lets her an d a few others
inside, and th en th e police confront the assem b led crowd. He attem p ts to sneak
them out the b a c k d oo r near a putrid k n o ll reeking o f urine an d feces guarded
by a lone police officer. The guard hesitates w hen attacked b y L a n d e ta b u t then
drives a bayonet in to the cholo’s breast. O n ly then does Landeta re a liz e that his
killer was none oth er than his form er co m p an io n , José M anuel Já tiva.
Játiva’s k illin g o f his compadre d em arcates the fragm entation o f the city and
underscores a n earlier appeal made by th e strik ers to the police c itin g th eir com
m on m estizo a n c e stry — "cholos mismo son !” T h is appeal also rein forces Icaza’s
treatment o f Já tiv a ’s schizophrenic altern ation between his identities as the cholo
from C h agu arp ata and policía número 12 0 . It is the cop who k ills L a n d e ta , but it
was Játiva w hose trigger finger hesitated w h en h is friend had ju st em erged from
the factory. T h e k eeper o f the peace sm ash es the butt o f his rifle in to th e head
o f a pregnant In d ia n as h is troop su p p resses a ru ral u prising, b u t it is Játiva
who recognizes h er glassy eyes as those o f h is w ife following h er execu tion by
Urrestes’s m in io n s for poaching corn. F in ally , it is policía número 12 0 w h o stands
next to policía número 132 as the latter c o llap ses, shouting, “ M e jo d ie ro n estos
carajos,” as th e y attem pt to control a cro w d protesting a rigged electio n . But it
is Játiva who tak es u p the call for s o lid a rity between police an d w o rkers until
another an o n ym o u s soldier finally cru sh es th e head o f the “escandaloso policía."76
The a n g u ish o f Játiva’s and L an d eta’s experiences develops a m acrospatial
argum ent lin k in g the city and the cou n trysid e. In it, the city no lon ger appears
to be the exploiter o f the countryside, as in Huasipungo, but in stead fu n ctio n s as
one part in an overarching system o f exp loitation . Other elem ents o f the novel
that help develop this leveling o f difference between the urban an d ru ra l realms
can be seen in U rrestes’s constant p resen ce in both spheres an d th e riot that
closes the novel itself. Evoking the c arn age o f the Guerra de los C u a tro Días of
1932— the b lo o d y street battle that resu lted fro m the d isqu alification o f the fas
cist presidential cand id ate Neptali B o n ifa z fo r having been b o rn in P eru — the
combat occurs as a result o f a disputed election between U rrestes an d another
hacendado, S o la n o del C astillo.77 The tw o spare no expense, ro u n d in g up able
Indians and cholos from their h aciend as to force an arm ed co n fro n ta tio n . Já
tiva’s eventual awareness o f the extent o f th is m anipulation m atters little, for the
struggle m ust continue, and even U rrestes and Solano are only p la y in g bit parts
in a dram a o f system ic brutality.
Icaza a lso tack les the physical e m b o d im en t o f the exploitative n ation al dy
nam ic on a m icro sp a tia l level. Early in th e novel, for exam ple, th e contingent
from C h a g u a rp a ta encounters the m assive Presidential Palace (“m á s g r a n d e que
A Phantasmagoric Dystopia / 171
la casa de la hacienda,” or larger than the haciend a house) before bedding dow n
in Santo Dom ingo P laza, the evocative description o f which is worth quotin g at
length:
A t 10 p m , m o r e o r le s s , a t a t t e r e d s c ro u n g e r a r r i v e d , s c r a t c h e d h is g r o in ,
h e a d , a n d lo u s e - r id d e n a r m p it s b e fo re r in g in g s o m e m e d a ls — s a in ts , v i r g i n s ,
cro sse s— as w e ll a s a fe w a m u le t s d a n g lin g o f f h i s c h e s t , a n d th e n , in b e tw e e n
c u rse s a n d s p e c ia l p r a y e r s , h e c u r le d u p in to a b a ll o f r a g s o n th e g r o u n d . A b it
la te r a b lin d m a n a c c o m p a n ie d b y a sh o e less b o y a p p e a r e d a n d d id th e s a m e .
L a te r th e re c a m e a n I n d ia n — a p u b lic p o r te r in d i s g r a c e — “A n y o n e c a n . A n y o n e .
E v e n t h e n a tiv e . . . ” t h o u g h t t h e tro u p e o f v i ll a g e r s , d r a g g in g th e m s e lv e s s lo w ly
to w a rd th e m is e r a b le c o v e r in g o ffe re d b y th e p o r t ic o . It w a s a w in d y a n d c o ld
n ig h t, b u t n o w o r s e t h a n t h e h o v e ls o f th e a lp in e m o o r s . L u c k ily , th e y w ere
a lr e a d y a c c u s t o m e d .7®
The distinction betw een the palace’s lu xu riou s h a lls and the cold stone o f the
plaza recreates the so c ia l m ap o f the city. T he colon ial center no longer serves
a nostalgic role but in stea d dem arcates cen turies o f exploitation. The squ alid
living quarters o f th e u rb an and rural poor, fro m C h aguarp ata to La T ola to
Chimbacalle, each con tain the same bare floors an d lack o f amenities. For Icaza,
this is the heart o f th e city, a point underscored b y h is strikin g choice to avoid
the private sphere o f th e w ealthy, who only ap p ear in public sites such as the
government palace, offices, and Urrestes’s factory.
Icaza’s dystopic visio n rests on a spatial account o f power evoking the liberal
dyll infused with a n indigenist-inflected attention to subaltern actors. A sim i
lar frame dom inates th e social realism o f H u m berto Salvador’s three socialist
novels o f the 1930s— Cam arada (1933), Trabajadores (1935), and Noviembre (1939).
Despite Gallegos L a ra ’s challenge, Salvador m ain ta in s the surreal landscapes,
Fragmented narratives, an d an obsession w ith psychological traum a and sexual
deviance that ch aracterized h is earlier works. O ther elem ents include the sp o
radic inflection o f an indigenista m ysticism th at recalls M ariátegu i’s project to
develop a distin ctly A n d e a n socialism and a tend en cy to universalize Q u ito’s
particularities that lin k s Salvad o r to the syn ech d och al chronotopical trends
explored throughout th is book.79
Each o f S alvad o r’s so cialist novels explores a p articu la r dim ension o f this
iconoclastic aesthetic. T h e first o f the three, Cam arada, features interlocking
episodes that develop a fragm ented montage that sh ifts through time and space,
providing only a con cep tu al m ap to anchor the reader.80 T h is conceptual tool
is provided by S alv ad o r’s fascination with b oth M a rx ism and sexual psych ol
ogy, which had been th e subject o f his thesis, “ E squem a sexu al.” Camarada thus
provides episodic accounts o f the violence o f bourgeois sexual transgression that
iltim ately contrast w ith w orking-class fidelity an d m odesty.
Most o f the novel cen ters on traumatic encounters that a young bureaucrat
172 \ A Phantasmagoric D ystopia
the need to tak e care o f her fa m ily .85 T h eir continued fin a n c ia l erosion forces
a sh ift fro m a m oderately c o m fo rta b le apartm ent in th e cen tral n eigh bor
hood o f L a M erced to tiny ro om s in L a C hilena— what S alv ad o r refers to as
“the last h u m an nest o f the c ity ”— follow ing Gálvez’s loss o f h is pen sio n .86
W h ile th e lack o f freedom to travel where one w ants or, conversely, being
forced to m ove to less costly q u arte rs are exam ples o f how p o verty lim its p o
tential in ad u lt lives, the city slow ly opens up to the yo u n g G o n zalo G álvez, a
narrator w hose name we learn o n ly in the closing pages o f th e novel. G o n zalo s
journeys at the behest of his fa m ily introduce him to the class divides at society’s
core.87 T h is knowledge is c o m m u n icated via three jo u rn eys across the valley,
which illu m in a te the urban flu id ity characteristic o f S alv ad o r’s earlier work and
reveal a M a rx ist framework. T h e first o f these journeys is at the behest o f Gon-
zalo’s au n t, Teresa, who sends h im to visit the elite chalets near A ven id a Colón,
where the b o y travels to beg for new clothes from the reputably generous Señor
Pérez. G o n z alo longingly gazes at th e trolley passing by, w ish in g th at he did
not need to trudge across the e x p a n se o f the city, on ly to fin d th at the refined
dandy aw aiting him at journ ey’s en d h as no interest in h is su p p lication s.88 T he
second is a b u s trip to Chim bacalle, where his father is about to bo ard the train
for Baños. A n urchin lacking the fare is ru n over by a ch au ffeu r an xio u s to press
on. Fin ally, on a second trip to th e north ern chalets, th is tim e near the Parque
de M ayo (today’s Ejido Park), G o n z alo tries to collect p aym en t for a dress Teresa
had m ade fo r a debutante. In th e gard en at the custom er’s hom e, he m eets a girl
his own age whose doll rem inds h im o f his neighbor B eatriz, w ho cries at night
for lack o f foo d. Although the girl is touched by his tale, h er fath er lets loose his
dogs to d rive away a boy he con siders a truant, thus im ped in g G o n z a lo s ability
to collect the much-needed fu n d s.
G o n z a lo ’s journeys— c o lle c tin g th e paym ent fo r T eresa, c a rin g for h is
father-— reveal the nature o f th e city. It is a divided but in tertw in ed space, as
Salvador m akes clear in an evocative passage that occurs ju st before G onzalo’s
encounter w ith the young girl:
My life was an irony— how ironic that a starved and ragged boy could enter
homes saturated with luxurious comforts.
It was a sensational discovery— next to the destitute Quito I knew existed
another Quito— that of the powerful.
These were two distinct cities that life’s great sarcasm arranged close by. Two
contradictory cities that were nevertheless interwoven, the one fused in the other.89
For G o n zalo , despite his tender age, th e city that had fru strated Salvad o r’s va n
guard n arrato r a few years earlier h a s bared its essential p arad o x in which the
interdependence o f poverty an d w ealth is obvious. A s S alvad o r m akes clear, this
knowledge com es with a price, as th e innocence o f youth is overw helm ed by the
jaded irony o f adolescence.
174 \ A Phantasmagoric Dystopia
gotena to ascend the political ladder. A n d rad e’s p rim ary skill is his sycophancy,
w hereas M a rta em ploys her lo o k s, though o f course w ith o u t sacrificing her
“h on or.” Salvad or contrasts th e ir ab ility to navigate Q u ito ’s'c o rru p t intrigue
with th e honorable designs o f th e socialist bureaucrat H ernán N avarro and his
frien d Jaim e, who strive to resist the repressive Dictador, w hose qualifications
are lim ited to trading w isecracks w ith soldiers in the Plaza de la Independencia.
W hile A lb erto and M arta rise to the top o f their professions, Jaim e and Hernán
su ffer fro m the widening abuses o f the despot and his h en ch m an , H err Heller,
the G erm an -b o rn ch ief o f police ru m ored to have trained w ith the Gestapo. The
city slow ly descends into a reign o f terror, worsened by a failed m ilitary insur
rection th at leads to the death o f a you ng poet nam ed Jorge A g u irre , whose only
crim e w as to clim b the barricades in search o f an ode.
T h e tw o-year presidency o f th e engineer Federico Páez, who rode a 1935
m ilita ry coup to power, p rovid ed the p rim ary inspiration fo r Salvad or’s novel
Noviembre. Despite some in itial legislation sym pathetic to w orkers and the in
digenous populations, Páez’s in a b ility to restrain the tu m u lt o f the Great De
pression delegitim ated his autocratic rule. The press, esp ecially the leftist daily
El Día, increasingly waged a w ar o f words that led the C alderón regim ent to stage
an in su rrectio n in Novem ber 1936, which indeed featured the death o f a poet—
the guam bra (child) Z am b ran o— on whom Salvador’s id ealistic Jorge Aguirre
was b ased . A ccording to the A m e ric a n traveler A lbert F ran k lin , Zam brano’s
death “gave transcendence” to the insurrection and proved a galvanizin g force
for the deepening opposition.95 Páez turned increasingly auth oritarian in ensu
ing m onths and indeed nam ed a N azi sym pathizer to head the Q uito police.96
The exp an sio n o f state terror u ltim a tely led the m ilitary to w ithdraw its su p
port fo r the governm ent. In O ctober, the m inister o f defense, A lb erto Enriquez,
forced Páez’s resignation an d in stalled an interim governm ent callin g for a “re
new al” o f the progressive sp irit.97
Noviem bres denouem ent loo sely follow s this narrative w h ile introducing
fan tastical and m ystical elem en ts that Salvador deploys as sym b ols o f Quito’s
innate sp irit. These sym bols b e g in to m ake their appearan ce w ith the poet’s
death, when Jorge A g u irre ’s lon e shot inspires a cavalcade o f b ullets, accom
panied by a chorus o f “ D ow n w ith intelligence and long live d eath !”— words
that h ad been fam ously spoken by Falangist general M illá n A stra y to rebut the
criticism o f the great Spanish essayist and poet M iguel de U n am u n o at the U ni
versity o f Salam an ca in 1936.98 Salvad o r fram es the city’s en su in g carnage as a
crucifixion delivering a crow n o f thorns to the Andean cap ital.99 T h is Christian
image explodes into a surrealist ode follow ing the battle, d u rin g which the fear
fu l q uiet haunts the young a c tiv ist H ernán. He collapses w h ile watching the
D ictador distribute m in isterial assignm ents and h allu cin ates th at the leader
gaily passes plates o f bones an d m orsels o f raw meat to a crow d o f yapping and
snarling dogs whose m ouths in term itten tly resemble those o f h u m ans. He col
lapses before this delusion, w h ich evokes the R abelaisian grotesqu e that had
176 \ A Phantasmagoric Dystopia
fascinated the 1920s avant-garde while also an ticip atin g the fam ous conclusion
o f O rw ell’s Animal Farm , in w hich it is im possible to differentiate betw een th e
revolutionary pigs an d the capitalist m en.100
The novel’s final p ages develop an im age o f Q u ito as a p hantasm agorical
skeleton populated b y “gh osts appearing as liv in g m en as they have lost th e
qualities that bring m a n k in d praise.” ’01 A g a in , H ern án hallucinates, th is tim e
seeing a visit by the d ea d poet, Jorge A gu irre, w ho com pares his m artyrd o m to
the attack on genius a n d creativity in fascist E u ro p e. A g u irre ’s words aw aken
anonym ous hordes o f gh osts who clam or for the execution o f governm ent tr a i
tors and call for the A n d e s them selves to aw aken, w hich they do. First M o u n t
Pichincha opens its a rm s, follow ed b y its siblin gs C him borazo, Cayam be, an d
El A ltar, sending a sh u dd er through the earth an d presaging the arrival a rebo rn
A tahualpa, who d elivers a speech claim ing A m e ric a fo r the workers o f the w orld
and calling for the re su rrectio n o f the ancient sp irit o f the city, slum berin g a ll
th is time. A t this clim ac tic m om ent, H ernán aw akes to find his friend Ja im e
telling him that it is a ll over. The m ilitary has d ep osed the Dictador and placed
a new progressive govern m ent in his place. T he c ity and nation are finally fre e .102
W ithin the generic con stitutions o f the novel o f th e phantasm agorical d y s
topia, Noviembre provides the first attem pt to reh abilitate the city’s image v ia the
seism ic intrusion o f a p rim o rd ial past ru p tu rin g h isto rica l colonialism to create
a new future that is b o th local and universal. T h e n o ve l’s d izzying conclusion
introduces an indigenista m etaphor that, for a ll its potency, is fram ed as the h a l
lucination o f a starvin g m an hop efu l for the fu tu re bu t certainly not in h is righ t
m in d — as evidenced b y h is earlier vision o f the tran sm u tatio n o f potential m in
isters into howling dogs. T h is vision recalls the tria l o f h um an ity from P a la cio s
Vida del ahorcado but serves a different point— th a t o f rehabilitating the sou l o f
a city long slum bering yet poten tially ripe for ch an ge and renewal.103 A s su ch ,
it can be compared to th e progressive spirit o f th e liberal idyll despite its ironic
sensibility. A fter all, w h ile anim ate m ountains an d dead Incas do not b u ild the
society.of the future, H ern án awakes from h is o w n d ream s to gaze upon a city
bathed in resplendent su n ligh t, a sight that is “a sym p h on y o f light and color . . .
beau tifu l, ardent, an d vo lu p tu ou s.” 104 The id y ll h a s fin a lly been tran sgressed
and transformed.
In the early tw entieth century, the historic Ib eria n evocation o f the c iv iliz
ing force o f urb an ity encountered a new lineage o f denunciations and c a stig a
tions o f city life. T h e p o ten tial liberation offered b y ru ral clim es d id ap p e ar
alongside this critique; however, the authors p ro cla im in g the barbarism o f city
life were not pastoral no stalgists. The urban is laced w ith the rural and h ea vily
A Phantasm agoric Dystopia / 177
178 \ A P h a n ta s m a g o r ic D y s t o p ia
tw een the city and its h interland . However, th is observation belies the direct
engagement with the u rb an economy by in d igen ou s com m unities. M oreover, it
also obscures the degree to which indigenous com m u n ities— in p articu lar the
com m une o f Santa C la ra de San M illan— th em selves m anipulated history, and
especially genealogy, as insiders aware o f the leverage o f historicity w ith in the
city’s m odernizing present.
Chapter 7
In Ju ly 1940, a group o f ind igen ou s comuneros from the tow n o f Santa Clara de
San M illán on Q uito’s ou tskirts petitioned Ecuador’s m in ister o f social welfare
to form an alternate cabildo. T h is com m uniqué criticized the current leader
ship, charging that the b o d y constituted an elite oligarchy, or gamonal, a term
u su ally reserved for lan d ed an d agroexport oligarchy. T h e petition claim ed
fu rth er that the cabildo m em bers had grown w ealthy throu gh their m an ip u
lation o f the com m u n ity’s com m on lands. O f p a rtic u la r concern to the p eti
tioners were urban properties that lay in the town’s n o rth ern environs, which
they charged the cabildo h ad distributed among them selves. In conclusion, the
comuneros alleged that those w ho were unable to gain the favor o f the cabildo for
access, such as the elderly or th e deaf, were forced to beg in order to survive.'
Pedro Pablo T u m ip am b a and Francisco T u m ip am b a , scions o f a leadin g
clan, presented the p etition. T h ese two brothers h ad long hoped to join the ca-
bildo’s m em bership, only to be thwarted by their father, long-standing legal rep
resentative José Federico T u m ip am b a, who claim ed th ey were still too young.
Earlier attem pts to appeal h is decision, both to the cabild o and the m in istry,
had ended in failure, p recipitatin g this new strategy o f petitioning with su p
179
i8o \ Santa Clara de San Millán
port fro m th e m arginalized factio n s, a tactic that sought to exp loit fissures in
the comuna.2 For the im poverished a n d elderly, the p astu res an d plots o f the
traditional com m unal lands represented sustainability fo r an cestral practices
besieged b y th e expanding city. For lo ca l entrepreneur F elician o S im b añ a, on
the other h a n d , common lands p ro vid ed a resource for the gro w in g network of
rental properties; he was thus tra d in g on the very forces o f ch ange that threat
ened h is fellow com m unity m em bers. N ation al politics also played a part. As
Pedro Pablo and Francisco T u m ip am b a w ould have well k n o w n , the M inistry
o f Social W elfare was dom inated b y so cialist intellectuals in clin ed to support a
crusade again st a gamonal,3
W hereas h is sons had adopted th e language o f class exploitation in their bid
to form an alternate cabildo, José Fed erico T um ipam ba issu ed a response that
deployed decades o f experience c ra ftin g land histories a n d lo ca l genealogies.
In his response, he defended a set o f statutes drafted in 19 10 th at guaranteed
the c o m m u n ity’s autonomy despite th e official prohibition o f collective land
holdings in th e m id-nineteenth c en tu ry . These th irty-year-o ld codes afforded
the elder Tum ip am ba a m eans o f ch allen gin g the alternate c a b ild o s legitimacy,
p articu larly a fter his brother-in-law, José Gabriel C o llah u aso, jo in ed its ranks.
Because C o llah u aso had been b o rn in the town o f S an golq u i in Q u ito’s south
eastern en viron s, Tum ipam ba co u ld cla im that his p articip atio n in the body
contradicted a requirement that c ab ild o m em bership be h ered itary. T h is argu
ment not o n ly conveniently d isregard ed C ollahuaso’s lon gtim e role as cabildo
president bu t also inherently ch allen ged the juridical p rim a cy o f the 1937 Ley de
C o m un as, w hich carried no such genealogical requirem ents fo r m em bership.
Such a stip u lation , however, did e x ist in Santa C lara’s earlier regu lation s and
had also been debated at the con gression al level on v a rio u s occasions during
the 1920s an d 1930s.4 T um ipam ba’s m an ipulation o f p arallel legal codes, along
with a second argum ent he m ade regard in g procedural irregu larities in the con
stitution o f the alternate cabildo, u ltim a tely prevailed. S oo n after, however, he
reached an arrangem ent with h is so n s, who finally achieved th eir desire to join
the traditional governing council, h a v in g aptly dem onstrated precocious politi
cal power.5
The 1940 conflict in Santa C la ra dem arcates several p o litic a l forces at play
w ithin th is indigenous com m un ity d u rin g the early tw entieth cen tury. These
include generational clashes, econom ic opportunism , an d th e m an ipu lation of
local h isto ries and genealogies w h en d ealin g with both state an d internal con
flicts. E ach o f these phenomena la y intertw ined w ithin three h isto rical threads.
T h e first thread concerns th e c ritic a l contestation b etw een the state, the
landow ning elite, and indigenous com m unities over control o f autonom ous eji
dos (com m on pastures) in the tow n’s environs. The origins o f th is strife lay in the
colonial era but intensified p erio d ic a lly during the n in eteenth cen tury. Santa
Clara offered consistent challenges to these m achinations, o ften u sin g a strategy
Santa Clara de San M illân / 181
free trade p olicies pushed increasing num bers o f tribute-paying In dian s into the
hacienda syste m , especially into the w ealth y Jesuit concerns in the C h illo and
Añaquito v a lle y s.16 These originarios conspired with large landow ners to person
ally deliver b u lk goods into the city an d th u s evade duties. Gateras also saw their
business gro w as sm aller proprietors an d urb an farm ers cultivating sm all plots
known as solares tu rned to them to avoid arousing A udiencia su sp icio n s.17 A n
act establish ing a C row n m onopoly over the production o f aguardiente in 1746,
ostensibly to fu n d construction o f a new royal palace, exacerbated th is situa
tion. R u ra l elites nurtured ties w ith local tax-farm ers (who collected taxes for
the Crown b u t were not employed b y the Crown directly) to avoid levies on the
drink’s p rod u ction while sm aller producers supplied the in fo rm al distilleries
installed beside the San Bias slaughterhouse on the northern edge o f the city.18
The new m easures also inspired tw o m ajor urban riots that underscore the
informal lin k ages between entrepreneurs and originario com m unities. T he first
was the aforem ention ed 1747 su b altern protest sparked by the a rriva l o f Lim a
com m issary G regorio Ibáñez C u evas. Besides sym bolically bran d in g Q uito as a
place o f enslavem en t, like Egypt was fo r the Hebrews o f the Bible, the protesters’
retreat to the utop ian Franciscan sa n c tu a ry o f San Diego likely succeeded pre
cisely becau se the originario tow nsh ip o f La M agdalena, ju st beyond the lim its
of San R o q u e p arish , sm uggled fo o d stu ffs to the rebels, again dem onstrating
the strong ties between the city and its environs. The second conflict developed
during the ad m in istration o f V iceroy Pedro M essia de la Cerda, who took office
in 1760 at the height o f the Seven Years’ W ar (1756—1763).19 Stru ck b y the fact that
Quito’s revenues represented a th ird o f those collected in the viceregal capital o f
Bogotá despite its sim ilar population, M essia de la Cerda im posed direct control
of the alcabala and the aguardiente m onopoly in M arch 1764.20 A year later, local
viceregal representative Juan D iaz d e H errera instituted the reform s.
The tra n sitio n to state co n tro l o f the m onopoly proceed ed relatively
smoothly, largely due to Diaz de H errera’s successful lobbying o f elite producers.
Active resistance erupted in late M ay, however, when he attem pted to reform the
alcabala an d require the registration o f solares in San Roque and S an Sebastián,
each being an eth nically m ixed p o p u lar parish with strong ties to the C hillo and
Turubam ba valleys. W ild rum ors circu lated in both city and corregimiento that
this reform w ould im pose a radical new order elim inating ejidos, trebling tribute
rates, and ta x in g newborns. On the evening o f M ay 22, a largely plebeian crowd
congregated in the Santa Barbara p laza and demolished the custom s house in
protest.21 N eith er the cabildo nor th e elite answered the A u d ien cias calls to sup
press the rio t, so it was several chaotic d ays before local Jesuits fin ally negotiated
a settlem ent suspen d in g the refo rm s and granting the rioters im m u n ity from
prosecution.
A n u n e a sy ca lm fell over the c ity for the next few weeks, u n til Ju ne 23, on
the eve o f th e festivities for the feast o f San Juan Bautista, w hich coincided with
the sem ian n u al arrival o f thousands o f corregimiento Indians to pay their tribu-
188 \ Santa Clara de San M illán
Fíg. 7.1. M ap o f Rosasp am ba, C atalo m a, an d L o m agorda. C ou rtesy A rch ivo N acion al de Histo
ria, Q uito.
m ore th an th irty witnesses called b y the com m u n ity’s defender, Pablo Antonio
Salazar, also provided insight into the im portance the properties played in the
m aintenance o f Santa C lara’s econom ic independence. N eighbors and business
associates from as far afield as M ach ach i, a good d ay’s jo u rn ey b y m ule train,
cam e to testify. Their statem ents portrayed a relatively prosperous and intercon
nected population whose tim ber and agricu ltu ral enterprises form ed an integral
p art o f the regional economy.
Faced w ith the prospect o f rejecting the legitim acy o f lan d titles or denigrat
ing a local m arket force, Superior C o u rt judge Pedro Ferm ín C evallos— found
ing m em ber o f the Liberal P arty and a w ell-know n h isto rian — postponed his
decision b y arguing that the references to variou s lan d m ark s, stream s, peaks,
and roads crisscrossing the upper slopes o f Pichincha rem ained im precise. He
therefore ordered a new m easurem ent o f the lan d s in q uestion in order to es
tablish th eir relation to the del M azo h acien d a and the tow n o f San ta Clara de
San M illá n . The resulting m ap (fig. 7.1) not on ly acquainted the judge with the
som ewhat remote area under d iscu ssion bu t also provided del M a zo ’s attorney,
R am ó n D elgado, a spatial argu m en t b y h igh ligh tin g the distan ce between the
properties on the upper slopes o f Pichincha and the In dian town along the royal
road. D elgado’s contention th at indigenous com m u n al lan d s w o u ld have been
contiguous to settlem ents reflected contem porary considerations m ore th an co
lon ial precedence. N evertheless, th is interpretation satisfied F erm ín Cevallos
on the question o f ownership, w hich w as awarded to Ju an a del M azo. However,
Santa Clara de San M illan / 189
the judge also m ain tain ed the state’s patronage o f indigen ous com m un ities by
r e a ffir m in g the comuna’s u s u fru c t rights as an econom ic necessity.
A s in 1835, th is arrangem ent suited neither party, w hich led to a th ird h ear
ing at the Suprem e C o u rt b e g in n in g in Ju ly 1857. B oth D elgado an d S ala z a r
p r e s e n t e d ra d ic a lly d ifferen t argu m en tation in th is new ch am ber. D elgad o’s
dismissive tone disappeared, replaced b y a respectfu l series o f depositions seek
ing to discredit th e ind igen ou s claim fo r u s u fru c t righ ts. For exam ple, w hen
discussing a 1769 b ill o f sale, D elgado now em ph asized th at the h acien d a en
joyed the yearly lab o r o f five In d ian s fro m San ta C lara de S an M illa n , an o b
ligation th at designated a trib u ta ry relationship rather th a n the c o m m u n ity ’s
ownership o f the p ro p e rty .42 M oreover, he argu ed th at the case represented a
national im perative given th at the co m m u n ity’s attem pt to supersede the legal
title would establish a precedent that w ould denigrate the institu tion o f private
property nationwide. S ala z a r ro u n d ly criticized D elgado’s argum en ts as ju st so
much flow ery lan guage, b u t h is ow n am ou nted to little m ore th a n a series o f
expositions regarding the “m iserable” state o f h is clients, a traditional argu m ent
designed to appeal to the p atern alist w h im s o f the state.43
T his argu m en t m ay w ell have w orked; however, the passage o f the decree
elim inating trib u te on O ctober 30 , 1857, ended the p rim a ry ju stifica tio n for
indigenous collective land ow nersh ip. T h e ju stices, who h ad h eard fin a l arg u
ments earlier th at m on th , p ostp on ed a decision u n til the follow in g M a rch , a
hiatus d u rin g w hich th ey appear to have ru m in ated on the im plications o f the
new statute.44 T h eir fin al sentence sidestepped the issue b y upholding the previ
ous judgm ents in a vague op in ion th at su m m a rily ignored cru cial d etails such
as whether u s u fr u c t righ ts w o u ld continue to be enjoyed an d the n u m b er o f
days the comuna w ould have to serve del M azo . Even a fter S ala z a r attem pted
to c la rify these m atters, the cou rt re fu se d to answer, argu in g th at these were
new issues not d iscussed d u rin g the trial. W hile this poin t denoted the delicate
future o f com m u n al lan d h o ld in g, it u ltim ately benefited San ta C lara de S an
M illan, w hich enjoyed continued u su fru c t rights to the properties. Indeed, the
group accelerated its lu m b er trade to such a degree th at del M a zo ’s son-in-law,
M anuel Chiriboga, w ould com plain to the court anew a decade later. D espite his
m yriad attem pts to label the com m u n ity as a cancer fru stratin g “progress,” the
m atter was again su m m a rily d ism issed .45
Santa C lara’s tussle w ith del M azo illu m inates the am bivalent status o f in
digenous collective properties. U ltim ately, neither the comuna nor the hacendado
was able to consolidate u n ita ry control over the lands in question despite a forty-
year struggle. T h is failu re resulted from the coexistence o f con flictin g notions
o f prop erty und er a flu id legal code where precedent w as con sisten tly ignored
in legislation yet applied in the courtroom . A s Santa C lara’s denizens appear to
have well understood, the recourse to colonial-era tactics such as the u nd erscor
ing o f cu sto m ary usage an d necessity continued to be clear ju stifications fo r the
m aintenance o f u su fru c t rights even when titles were not held.
190 \ Santa Clara de San M illán
T he case also illustrates the im po rtan t role p layed b y access to the central
state apparatus. The co m m u n ity’s rapid m ove to exploit the propitious circum
stances engendered b y the 1854 L ey de Indígenas suggests the existence o f a feed
back loop less developed in m ore isolated areas. W hereas San ta C lara managed
to consolidate u su fru c t righ ts, ru ra l areas across the cou n try suffered a steady
erosion in the num ber o f sim ilar plots due to the encroachm ent o f the growing
h aciend a system . T h is was p artic u la rly the case in areas su ch as Chimborazo,
where hacendados system atically carved up indigenous lands du ring the 1860s by
exploiting not on ly intra-ethnic conflicts bu t also the p otential to legally divest
collective land hold ings established the previous decade. By 18 71, tensions had
developed to such an extent th at an insu rrection o f perhaps ten thousand souls
erupted u n d er the leadership o f Fernando D aq u ilem a o f Y aru qu ies in an ulti
m ately fru itless gesture th at encouraged m ilitarizatio n o f the state presence.46
Violence d id not erupt on the D aqu ilem a scale in other areas o f the country;
however, h eavily indigenous zones like C o to paxi and Im babura also saw their
share o f localized clashes. The Q uito region, however, rem ained quiet. A s in the
late colonial period, the city’s p roxim ity to pow er and the subsequent empower
m ent o f the indigenous com m unities on its p eriph ery m ay have h ad a hand in
this situation.
w hose theories h ad spread throughout L atin A m erica during the latter th ird o f
the nineteenth century. O n the other h an d, they bolstered the state’s argum ent
r e g a r d in g the necessity o f continued patronage o f indigenous populations m ired
in perm anent indebtedness th rou gh concertaje. A s they h ad fifty years earlier,
L ib e r a ls argued th at this condition la id bare the im m orality o f the hacienda,
a n d they again called for the d ism a n tlin g o f the peonage system . N um erous
s c h o la r s have noted th at th is p latfo rm was intended to relocate indigenous la
bor to coastal cacao p lantation s.48 However, until the eradication o f concertaje in
X919, there were only m in im a l changes in everyday relations betw een the state,
rural indigenous com m unities, and hacendados.
Liberals lam ented this situation, but their internal squabbles postponed any
action u n til after A lfa ro ’s death in 19 12. A new indigenous code, passed in 1913,
promulgated the patern alist spirit o f nineteenth-century liberalism b y reaffirm
ing protection for collective lan d ow nersh ip w hile stipulating th at the “q u asi
contract o f com m u n ity” necessitated liaisin g w ith the state. The code inspired
vitriolic responses. In an essay in the law review Revista Forense, for exam ple,
Loja attorney D ario Palacios argu ed that the code resurrected an institu tion
that had been eradicated b y piecem eal legislation passed in the last th ird o f the
nineteenth century. Palacios’s critique resonated in a series o f condem nations
of the status quo b y liberal law m akers and bureaucrats.49 One o f the m ore ada
mant cam e from geographer N icolás M artínez, who had ju st begu n overseeing a
railroad com m ission w orking to lin k A m bato w ith the A m azo n ian interior. His
ensuing 1916 m onograph on the province o f T u n gu rah u a’s indigenous pop u la
tions reconsidered the u su a l Liberal defense o f the self-reliance and freedom ex
perienced b y these com m unities. Instead, he slam m ed the ferocity and separat
ism that h ad m et h is crew’s attem pts to survey comunero lands and advocated in
creased regulation.50 The 1919 passage o f the law outlawing concertaje encouraged
congressional deputy V ictor M an u el Peñaherrero to introduce a b ill redefining
com m unal ow nership as a contract w ith m in im a l h ered itary protections and
well-established bureaucratic oversight. The stage was set for a system ic debate
concerning the future o f these properties. It was a debate that h ad em erged in
concert w ith the flourish in g o f indigenismo during the 1920s and 1930s.
E cu ad o rian indigenismo in corporated both aesthetics and politics, w ith its
proponents attem pting to negotiate a space for alternatives to Eurocentric para
digm s. A s in M exico or Peru, the m ovem ent largely involved leftist intellectuals
whose idealization o f p re-C o lu m b ian life m erged with a push for social egali
tarianism and the creation o f a transn ation al “ Indoam erica” as a counterweight
to the capitalist world. A s d iscu ssed earlier, Jorge Icaza, Fernando Chávez, and
H um berto Salvad or tran slated th is th eory into an em phatic condem nation o f
the hacienda and its ow ners— the w hite urban elite. T his fram ew ork echoed the
political th eory o f the rad ical liberal Pío Jaram illo Alvarado, who considered the
com m une a potential corrective to the greed o f the landow ning class.5'
In his early w ritings, inclu d in g the influential El indio ecuatoriano, Jaram illo
192 \ Santa Clara de San M illán
and proto-fascist street gangs in Quito. L ocal in stitutions attem pted to fill the
void; however, m in im a l changes occurred in the everyd ay governance o f rural
indigenous populations. T h is situation changed only u nd er the dictatorship of
Federico Páez, the engineer whose ad m in istration operated w ith leftist support
bu t becam e increasingly autocratic.
One o f Páez’s progressive decrees, delivered on Ju ly 30 ,19 37, fo rm ally recon
stituted legal com m u n al lan d u nd er the aegis o f the M in isterio de Previsión
S ocial. N ew comunas established h a d to m eet several criteria, such as a m ini
m u m population o f fifty persons, a five-m em ber cabildo to govern the comuna,
regu lar m inutes, elections, an d an inventory o f collective goods. T he law codi
fied supp ort for com m on possession o f p rop erty i f it h ad been in possession of
the co m m u n ity for th irty years— a p rovision th at protected h acien d a lands
from expropriation or challenge. The law thus th eoretically offered a potential
response to ru ral unrest b y bolstering indigenous landow nership w ithout undo
ing the status quo. M oreover, the law ’s stipu lation that cabildos could purchase
or divest com m on lands encouraged greater m arket engagem ent w hile the need
to gather the support o f both the m em bership and the m in istry potentially lim
ited intercom m un al clashes. Finally, the statute called for the “ betterm ent" of
the group’s m oral, intellectual, and m aterial situation.59
W hile the new legislation called for the establishm ent o f comunas by the end
o f 1937, only tw enty-five h ad been constitu ted b y 1938, leading to an extension of
the deadline. Ten tim es that num ber appeared in the follow ing year, prim arily
in the A n d ea n provinces o f C him borazo and C o to p axi, where there was a long
h isto ry o f com m u n al action . P ich in ch a, d espite bo th the extensive activism
o f com m unities in C ayam b e and its p ro xim ity to the capital, lagged behind.
Becker h as speculated that the activist past o f indigen ous groups in Cayambe
m oderated their enthusiasm for the new regulations, w hich th ey interpreted as
m ed d lin g b y the M in isterio de Previsión So cial. Econom ic realities also ham
pered those com m unities that in itially adopted the comuna structure. Absentee
ism from comuna m eetings in A zcásu bi A lto in the southern p a rt o f the canton,
for instan ce, increased due to the m in is try ’s insistence on children attending
d istan t state schools in keeping w ith the law ’s encouragem ent o f local cultural
progress. T h is p osition ignored econom ic reality, w h ich m ade the extended
journey to these schools a practical im possibility. W ith no fu n d s or pedagogical
train in g available for a local school, en th usiasm for the new regulations waned
during the 1940s and afterw ard .60
Tight finances lim ited the reach o f comunas in the Cayam be region, but Kim
C lark h as recently argued th at the greater op p ortu nities offered b y proxim ity
to the Q uito m arketplace fueled a desire for com m on lands in its environs. She
p articu la rly cites the exam ple o f peasants tied to the Tolóntag hacienda in the
p arish o f Pintag to the east o f the capital. B egin n in g in 1934, the resident hua-
sipungueros h ad challen ged leaseholder José Ignacio Izu rieta fo r access to the
Santa Clara de San M illan / 195
hacienda’s lan d s, an d th ey garn ered support from the p op u list president Jose
M aria Velasco Ib arra u n til his ouster in A u g u st 1935. L an d invasions follow ed
in 1936, and , in the 1940s, huasipunqueros petitioned that th eir com m ittee be
recognized as the council for an autonom ous comuna. The petition stalled in the
m inistry as a result o f the tech n ical im plau sibility o f such a m ove; as a group
of peasants legally tied to a h acien d a, the group was ineligible for such status.
Inexplicably, at som e point in the su m m er o f 1944, the m inister authorized its
form ation, ostensibly due to repeated petitioning. A lthough this m ay have been
a clerical error— and was decried as su ch in internal com m unications— Clark
posits that the decision m ay have been tied to Velasco Ibarra’s retu rn to power
in the so-called G lorious R evolution o f M ay 1944. She therefore high lights the
benefits o f selective engagem ent w ith the paternalist state, in which loyalty to a
particular caudillo provided real political and economic gain s.61
A lth ough both C lark and Becker note the im portance o f local dynam ics and
the regional political economy, neither system atically engages the im portance o f
proxim ity to the capital. G iven P in tag’s location not far from Quito, on the edge
of the C h illo V alley— a lon gtim e source o f produce for the Q uito m arket— the
huasipunquero desire to gain control over productive lands suggests their consid
eration o f u rb an tradin g possibilities. Indeed, the prosperity that the peasants
of Tolontag enjoyed b y 1945 likely em erged from a decade o f v irtu a l control over
profitable lands th at enabled b oth sustainable agriculture and the m arketing o f
their surplus.
Such activities h ad a long h isto ry w ith in the c ity ’s environs, as previously
noted. T h e tw en tieth -cen tu ry exp an sio n o f Q uito, however, b o th challenged
traditional m odes o f production an d offered alternate and often lucrative eco
nomic possibilities. San ta C lara de S an M illa n was one o f the first populations
to establish comuna status, an d its decision to do so in 1938 bu ilt u p on decades
of entrepreneurial a ctiv ity engaging the new opportunities afforded b y the ex
panding city. T h is type o f risk-taking activity was balanced by the secu rity a f
forded b y th eir com m on lan d s. The co m m u n ity’s support for E loy A lfa ro and
his lax p olicy on com m u n al holdings du rin g h is struggle w ith Leonidas Plaza
had paid dividends b y 19 11, at which point Santa C lara received official recogni
tion as a sem i-autonom ous collective and likely regained its holdings on the u p
per reaches o f Pich inch a.62 The leadership o f the com m unity zealously guarded
its auth o rity over these properties despite frequent attem pts b y d isgru n tled
m em bers to profit b y the n ebu lou s state o f collective lands. The state’s new
regulations in 1938 thus represented a chance to form ally regulate these internal
conflicts, and the cabildo thus em braced these new laws. The cabildo selectively
embraced econom ic d iversification w hile m aintain ing strict control over both
collective p rop erty and in tern al political hegemony. For both these endeavors,
controlling the public status o f historic narratives was critical and helped create
a subaltern chronotope o f u rb an indigenous autonomy.
ig6 \ Santa Clara de San M illán
Santa C lara em erged fro m the nin eteenth cen tu ry as one o f the wealthier
indigenous com m u nities in the Q uito area. Its p rim a ry econom ic activities
continued to be lum ber, an im al h u sbandry, an d som e artisan al production—
p articu larly carpentry, as a result o f the fine hardw oods on P ich in ch as forested
slopes. A few enterprising souls ow ned sm all shops specializing in dried goods
and farm in g equipm ent. T hese b u sinesses congregated along the Carretera
del N orte— later renam ed C arrera 18 de septiem bre an d now A ven id a 10 de
agosto— which rem ained the p rim a ry artery lin k in g Q uito w ith the breadbas
ket o f the A ñ aqu ito plains. The shops catered to laborers from the haciendas of
L a G ranja and E l Batán an d indigenous m erchants fro m north ern areas such
as R um ip am ba, Zám b iza, or C otocollao. Som e such custom ers stayed at the
room s rented out b y Nicolás Concham bay, a respected elder w hose hom e served
as an in form al com m unity center. Friends, acquaintances, an d especially kin
folk fro m across A ñaquito gathered frequ ently to gossip, receive m essages, con
duct business, or even await trial.
A cross the Carretera del N orte fro m C oncham bay’s house stood an im pos
ing neoclassical m ansion, a h arbinger o f change kn ow n as L a Circasiana. The
b u ild in g belonged to M an u el Jijón, a doctor, artisto crat, and entrepreneur re
sponsible for in stallin g Q uito’s first electric w orks, in 1894. Som ew hat w him si
cally nam ed for his w ife’s Eastern European roots, the house provided a weekend
and sum m er residence where the elegant couple an d their youn g son, Jacinto,
could escape the bustle o f the city. The novelty o f their presence inspired elabo
rate welcom ing festivals fro m the indigenous com m unity, including celebratory
arches in an echo o f colonial deference.63 H owever, th e Jijóns also pioneered a
w ider expanse o f nouveau riche sum m er soujourns in Santa C lara’s backyard
follow in g the 1908 com pletion o f the G u a y a q u il-Q u ito ra ilro a d .64 Sporting
events follow ed at a rud e track denoted the H ippodrom e, located about a k ilo
m eter east o f the Jijón house along the still un paved A venida Colón. Patrons of
its horse races and polo and tennis m atches in clud ed the fashionable dandies
o f Q uito such as the D u rin i brothers an d th eir frie n d G enaro L arrea. Others
rented autom obiles for d ay excursions along the d u sty cou n try roads, oblivious
to existing indigenous com m unities.
N ext cam e suburbanization projects b y local and foreign speculators who
sought to cash in on the grow in g fascination w ith the bucolic lifestyle. The Lar
rea fa m ily again took the lead b y convertin g a g ric u ltu ra l lan d w est o f A la m
eda Park into the C iudad ela L arrea in 1906. W ith the com pletion o f a city wide
tram lin e in 1914 that ended at the A ven id a C olón, however, the possibility o f a
grander suburb in the hitherto ru ra l enclave becam e m ore attractive. B y 1917, the
A nglo-French Syndicate h a d purchased a w ide tract o f land no rth o f the Larrea
Santa Clara de San M illán / 197
d eed for the entire p rop erty i f he d id not receive the am oun t due im m ediately.
Needless to say, Freile rap id ly raised the rem ain in g fu n d s so as not to lose his
estate.68 T h e other two cases concerned lu x u ry item s th at also figured in the
perform ance o f prosperity, nam ely, Freile’s tailored suits an d the garage for his
autom obile. W hile he qu ickly paid the garage fees, it took m ore th an tw o years
for h im to honor h is debts to h is tailor, A lejan d ro R eyes. W hen Freile finally
m ade his paym ents, it was once again because Reyes threatened to im pound the
salon fu rn itu re p rou d ly displayed at the Q u inta, an u nthinkab le affrontery to
h is m ise-en-scène.69
W h ile Freile h on ored the debts on h is m ortgage and the relatively high-
profile obligations to society figures, he was less considerate when entering into
contracts w ith subaltern actors also seeking to engage the real estate m arket.
One such exam ple w as Ju lio M en a, a sm all-tim e m erchant who rented a tienda
(store or a sort o f apartm ent) from H ercilia G arcia at the corner o f 18 de septiem
bre and Colón. In D ecem ber 1920, M ena entered into an ill-considered contract
w ith Freile in w hich he offered fifty sucres to purchase a load o f gravel sitting on
the patio at the Freile fam ily hom e on Plaza San Francisco, presum ably m ateri
als le ft over fro m the constru ction o f M iraflores. H aving given a ten-sucre de
posit, M ena bought a cart the follow ing Ja n u a ry from Lu is de Toro o f Latacunga
and transported alm ost all o f the stones to the north. However, Freile soon took
M en a to cou rt, as the latter h ad le ft the sm aller stones on the patio and had
not p aid for the rem aind er o f the load b y Ja n u a ry 19 .7° M ena then paid Freile
and carted o ff the rest o f the gravel, but he could not afford the cou rt costs with
w hich he was subsequently saddled. T h is sh ortfall led h im to default on his cart
paym ents, w hich prom pted de Toro to sue h im the follow ing M arch.71 A s Mena
tried to re c tify this m atter, he fell beh ind on rent, w hich led his lan d lad y to start
eviction proceedings in O ctober 19 22.7a A lth o u gh he appears to have been able to
weather the storm th at year, the m atter was not com pletely resolved u n til 1925,
w hen the la n d lad y fin a lly received the la st o f h er rent p aym ents, w ith Mena
once again sadd led w ith cou rt costs. He w as in effect the victim o f a volatile
m arketplace.73
A m ore su ccessfu l m odel can be seen am ong the San ta C lara com m unity,
w hich m an ip u lated its properties to best take advantage o f private and public
p lan n in g schem es. One o f the first and m ost successful attem pts to do so came
at the intiative o f a carpenter nam ed José Federico T u m ip am ba. Know n locally
as Federico, T u m ip am b a dom inated the com m une’s affairs a fter being named
its legal representative in 19 11, though h is father and then his brother-in-law of
ficially served as cabildo presidents u n til the 1940s.74 One o f T u m ip am b a’s first
projects involved the grow ing m arket for San ta C lara lum ber due to increased
construction north o f the city. He hoped to expan d access to the com m unities'
forests on P ich in ch a to m eet this dem and, b ut to do so w ould require build
ing a new road, w hich the com m u n ity could not afford. In 1917, T um ipam ba
therefore approached Enrique C h iriboga, heir to the neighboring Pambachupa
Santa Clara de San M illán / 199
hacienda, whose ancestors had attem pted to elim inate the com m unity's right to
their properties on Pichincha. A fte r m onths o f discussion and m ultiple drafts
o f a contract, the indigen ous “vecinos de Benalcdzar” signed an agreem ent w ith
Chiriboga to b u ild a toll road, the profits o f w hich w ould be shared equ ally b e
tween bo th parties. U nder th is contract, the hacendado p rovided all o f the land
that w ould be developed, thus securing the integrity o f the com m u n ity’s hold
ings, w hile the In dian s w ould provide the labor. Strikingly, the contract also
included a clause acknow ledging th at the foreseen m unicipal expropriation o f
the road w ould term inate the deal, an extrem ely prescient m easure given that
the road led into what is still an underdeveloped sector o f the m ountain west o f
Avenida V argas, to d ay’s A venida A m erica.75
Comuneros who c a re fu lly tracked m u nicip al policies also were able to find
new possibilities for in d ivid u a l investm ent. For instance, in 1925, several co
muneros, in clud in g N icolás T ip an to cta and Feliciano Sim bañ a, divested th em
selves o f titled properties at the edge o f the L a G ranja hacienda near the R um i-
pam ba R iver in anticipation o f a crackdow n by the Ju nta de Em bellecim iento
de la C iu dad on the com m on practice o f m aintaining grazing plots in what was
technically street frontage.76 Sim b añ a invested his proceeds in a new lot, closer
to A venida Colón, where he b egan to bu ild a house in the late 1920s. U pon com
pleting a rude stru ctu re in 1931, Sim b añ a leased the bu ild ing to a m an nam ed
G uillerm o Jaram illo for five years, w ith the first tw o years’ rent (552 sucres) de
livered in advance. The last three years w ould then be paid at a reduced rate de
term ined by how m an y im provem ents Jaram illo undertook during the interim .
Two years later, Sim b añ a prom ptly evicted Jaram illo, despite the latter’s h aving
paneled, papered, and w hitew ashed fou r room s, fixed several w alls, b u ilt a new
brick room , an d painted the exterior. Jaram illo sued for breach o f contract, yet
the judge foun d that Sim b añ a h ad the right to evict his tenant, stipulating that
the cost o f m aterials be refu nd ed . In other words, Sim baña m anaged to receive
two years’ rent an d su b stan tial im provem ents on his property at cost w ithout
h aving to p ay fo r labor. He prom ptly leased the house again, at a su bstan tially
higher rate.77
The comuneros’ divestitu re o f lan d parcels in 1925 requ ired d iscip lin ed ac
tions. T h eir carefu l strategy bears the im print o f Federico T u m ip am b a, whose
efforts as de facto head o f the com m u nity were intended to foster a collectivist
spirit while advancing the co m m u n ity’s economic growth. The toll road exploit
in 1917 advanced th is objective, as d id T u m ip am b a’s later organization o f two
“ bandas de soplo,” or w in d ensem bles, that represented Santa C lara de S an M il
lán w hen p layin g at cityw id e festivities, or peñas. T u m ip am b a eschewed the
in fo rm al arrangem ent th at such groups u su a lly adopted and instead operated
these bands as legally bo u n d societies w ith contractual statutes. These included
severe p u nish m ents for anyone who le ft the com pany. One who d id leave was
Julio Jaram illo, no relation to the fam ous Julio Jaram illo who was a pasillo singer
from G u ayaqu il. W hen the ban d m em ber Jaram illo contracted a lung ailm ent
200 \ Santa Clara de San M illán
rented the property. The case therefore suggests that com m u n ity m em bership
and u s u fr u c t rights rem ain ed pliable privileges m eted out b y the cabildo, at
tim es ju stifie d b y m an ip u latio n o f the ve ry state actors on its doorstep. T h is
situation can be even m ore clearly dem onstrated throu gh another case played
out between 1927 and 1930.
A s in the T ip an to cta-T ip án com plain t, the k ey issue in th is co n flic t con
cerned the sale o f com m u n al p rop erties, in this case a lot th at form ed p a rt o f the
C atalom a territory th at h ad once b een under the control o f the C h irib o ga fam
ily o f the Pam bach upa h aciend a. H owever, th is p articu la r d ispu te em broiled
various m em bers o f the T u m ip am b a fa m ily an d culm inated in a failed attem pt
b y the coun cil to deploy a fabricated h isto ry o f land use to resolve the th o rn y
conflict betw een Federico and h is uncle, José A n ton io T u m ip am b a. T h e con
flict concerned a fallow plot controlled b y A ntonio T u m ip am b a, who h a d filed
a questionable su it for entitlem ent in 1926. T h e follow ing M a rch he sold the
plot fo r five h u n d red sucres to Pedro C am ach o, an em ployee o f th e L egación
A m e ric a n a .83 N o im m ediate steps were taken to counter th is m ove. H owever,
when Federico’s cousin Fran cisco T u m ip am b a sold an adjacent plot the follow
ing M arch , the cabildo sprang into action to stop a dom ino effect.
In tern al politics m a y have in flu en ced this extended delay. A n to n io T u m i-
pam ba’s brother Ju a n — Federico’s fath er— was still president o f the comuna in
1927 an d probably discou raged legal proceedings. Ju a n ’s death th at sam e year,
however, caused a pow er vacu u m th at rem ained u n filled u n til José G ab riel Col-
lahuaso, Federico T u m ip am b a ’s brother-in-law , was n am ed president in 1928,
despite h is lack o f hereditary m em bership in the comuna. T u m ip am b a rem ain ed
as procurador b u t w o u ld ever a fte r be referred to as San ta C la ra ’s h ead o r jefe.
Francisco T u m ip am b a’s sale o f com m on lands w ould therefore have b een seen
as the first real test o f the new pow er stru ctu re and w as tak en as su ch b y the
cabildo. A t an em ergency m eeting on A p ril 26,19 28 , the cabildo resolved to p eti
tion the M in istry o f S ocial W elfare to bar in d ivid u al comuneros fro m sellin g the
co m m u n ity’s p rop erty (essentially presaging the 1937 L e y de C om un as) w hile
also dem an d in g restitution for the tw o lots in question.
The letters cra fte d b y C o llah u aso an d T u m ip am b a clearly express fear o f
com m unal chaos w hile a rticu la tin g a specific conceit regarding th e h isto ricity
o f the violation. C o llah u aso’s cover letter focuses on the illegality o f the actions,
noting th a t the seizure o f the A iñ a plot violated the first three articles o f San ta
Clara’s statutes, a statem ent ob viou sly intended to reify bo th the v a lid ity o f the
docum ents as w ell as the status o f the collective h oldings. In a tellin g phrase,
C ollah uaso high lights A n ton io T u m ip am b a ’s neglect o f “ the sacred righ ts left
by our ab origin al ancestors to conserve ou r lan d s as p roperty o f each an d every
one o f the comuneros.” 14 T h is clause not on ly alludes to trad ition al fram ew orks
o f legitim acy b y referencing lon g-stan d in g precedent bu t also h igh lig h ts the
stakes involved regard in g in d iv id u a l an d collective lan d ow n ersh ip . Federico
T u m ip am ba’s m ore elaborate letter echoes sim ilar com m onplaces. For instan ce,
202 \ Santa Clara de San M illán
he notes that the lands have been held “ desde tiempo immemorial" (trom tim e im
m em orial), a com m on phrase found in scores o f colonial and ninteenth-century
petitions, while he also challenges A n ton io and Fran cisco T u m ip am b a’s honor
(“con estudiada m alafé,” w ith deliberate b ad faith). He continues to alert the m in
ister o f the dangers o f not actin g, p redicting “com plete anarchy and disorder,"
which w ould occur as a result o f the fact th at “other u n su spectin g comuneros will
follow the d isloyal p ath the sales have w rought.” 85
The cabildo then sent copies o f the m en’s letters to E l Comercio, w hich p u b
lished them on A p ril 29, 1928.86 T h is strategy traded u p on the ongoing fear of
a w idespread indigenous rebellion w ith in city lim its. D ating back to the 1765
Rebellion o f the B arrios, the fear o f m ajor un rest h ad becom e m ore pronouncd
w ith the recent lan d invasions across C ayam b e and other p arts o f the Andean
corridor. In w hat m igh t be considered a p erfo rm ative m ove seeking to parlay
these concerns into su pp ort for their p osition , the cabildo follow ed the letters
w ith ritu a listic violence o f its ow n. C o llah u aso, T u m ip am b a , an d the rest of
the cabildo converged on Pedro Cam acho, who h ad sped up the m ountain aftei
reading the notice in El Comercio, and in fo rm ed h im th at lan d he h ad boughl
was com m unal property. A fte r advising h im to leave, they uprooted his alfalfa
crop.87
C am ach o’s conn ections at the L egación A m e ric an a enabled h im to hire
an accom plished law yer n am ed A lejand ro C ueva. C u eva’s b rie f on h is client’s
b e h a lf argu ed that the title C am ach o held tru m p ed any claim b y the abstrad
com m une. A review o f n in eteenth-century legislation, p articu larly focusing or
the civil codes o f 1873 and 1877, m aintain ed th at com m on landholding h ad beer
outlawed. C u eva also took p ain s to directly assau lt the legitim acy o f the com
m une itself, noting th at the statute’s assertion o f the in d ivisibility o f its property
directly countered the constitu tion’s protection for private property. A s such, hi
m aintain ed that Santa C lara could only be considered a fiction and even deniec
th at A n ton io T u m ip am b a h ad ever belonged to the in stitu tio n . A s should be
clear, this reasonin g follow ed the sam e lin e elaborated b o th b y D om ingo de
M azo and Enrique C h irib o ga in their m id-nin eteen th -cen tury attem pt to take
control o f Catalom a and Rosaspam ba and b y the stan d ard contem porary libera
argum ents d etailed above.
The com m une responded b y p rod u cin g statu tes w hose approval b y Elo)
A lfa ro clearly dem arcated th eir cred en tials. Sym p ath etic ears in the m inis
try, p articu la rly those S o cia list P arty m em bers alread y collaborating w ith in
digenous p op u latio n s elsew here, called for an in sp ection to v e rify the exten
o f the la n d u n d er dispute. T he subsequent report fro m the Teniente Politice
h igh lighted the con tigu ity o f b o th parcels w ith San ta C lara’s lan d and callee
for supp orting the com m u n e’s petition. A n ton io T u m ip am b a was ordered te
retu rn the fu n d s he h ad received fro m C am ach o and place the lan d back inte
the hands o f the cabildo.
The comunas strategy o f sim ultaneous legal action, the m an ipulation o f thi
Santa Clara de San M illán / 203
public press, and ritu alistic violence therefore appear to have worked, allowing
the com m un ity to regain control over the property. G iven their lack o f tru st in
A ntonio T u m ip am b a , the cou n cil m em bers opted to hand the p rop erty over
to Luis T u m ip am b a, another o f Federico’s nephews. Two years later, A n ton io
T u m ip am b a retaliated b y p etition ing the M in isterio de Previsión Social to re
tu rn the la n d to h is control an d in the process properly reinstate h im w ith in
the com m unity. In h is requ est fo r adjudication, he m aintain ed th at Federico
T um ip am ba operated as a tyran t, pu nish ing h im for the honest m istake he had
m ade two years earlier as a result o f ignorance o f the law. M oreover, he accused
Luis T u m ip am b a o f h a vin g b rib ed Federico b y p ayin g tw enty-two sucres for
u su fru ct righ ts.88
Rather th an resort to colonial precedent or affirm their status as indigenes
needing the patronage o f the state, Federico Tu m ip am ba and José G abriel C ol
lahu aso presented them selves in their defense as law -abiding citizens follow
ing the w ill o f an autonom ous coun cil operating w ith the fu ll knowledge o f the
m inistry. Federico p articu la rly sought to d im in ish his ow n role in the alterca
tion so as to counteract the charges o f nepotism levied b y his uncle. He noted
that each step taken against both sellers in 1928 had been ordered by the cabildo
with the fu ll knowledge o f the m in istry. W hen pressed on the issue o f whether
José A ntonio h ad been ousted fro m the com m unity, Federico swore that he had
m erely in form ed his uncle about a verbal order from then-m inister Pedro Pablo
Egüez Baquerizo. C o llah u aso echoed these precepts in his statem ent while also
in form in g the new lab o r com issary, A lb erto B atallas, th at L u is T u m ip am b a
had m erely been p ayin g h is p ro p erty taxes. U pon being subpoenaed to clear
the m atter, Luis T u m ip am b a confirm ed th at he h ad inherited the plot after the
death o f h is father, also called Ju a n de Dios T u m ip am b a, in 19 12. He also of
fered an elaborate h isto ry o f the la n d ’s use, stating that first he h ad farm ed it for
four years befóte renting the parcel to Federico T u m ip am ba for the next four. In
1920, he claim ed to have let the lot to José A ntonio Tu m ip am b a for twelve years
and h ad received it back when the com m unity h ad taken charge o f the land after
ousting Pedro C am ach o two years earlier.89
A s w ould later be con firm ed b y Federico, this story was a com plete fabrica
tion and appeared as such to B atallas as well. N ot only was there no earlier m en
tion o f L uis T u m ip am b a as the la n d ’s owner but the plausibility o f C ollah u aso’s
explanation for the tw enty-tw o-sucre paym ent m ade little sense given the com
m u n ity’s earlier ta x obligations. In 1927, for instan ce, Santa C lara’s prop erty
taxes totaled n in ety-six sucres on lands valued at tw enty-four thousand sucres,
alm o st fifty tim es C am ach o ’s purchase price o f five h u nd red su cres.90 B atal
las thus sid ed w ith A n to n io T u m ip am b a and decried Federico T u m ip am b a’s
autocratic ru le w hile recom m ending h is censure for the “simulacro democrático”
enveloping S an ta C lara. Faced w ith the possibility o f fu rth er erosion o f the com
m u n ity’s territory, Federico approached h is uncle to negotiate a private solu
tion. U nder th is accord, th e p rop erty w ould be d ivided into three p arts: one
204 \ Santa Clara de San M illán
for A ntonio T um ipam ba, one for the cabildo (adm inistered, naturally, b y Fed
erico Tum ipam ba), and one fo r L u is T u m ip am b a. T hree weeks later, Antonio
signed an agreem ent that prom ised h im control over the parcel “ h asta cuando
dios [tenga] queja alguna” (until G o d com plains). Significantly, the right to sell
the property rem ained rescinded and C atalom a’s in violability rem ained secure.
Federico’s prestige, however, h ad taken a hit, an d his activities appear to have
been curtailed over the next several years while less affluent com m oners sought
out B atallas’s help w ith their ow n inheritance issues.91
The new legislation introduced in 1937, however, strengthened the cabildos
political position. Its p rim a ry responsibilities rem ain ed the ad m in istration of
com m on p rop erty but now u n d er m uch m ore fo rm a l gu idelin es. T he council
com prised five m em bers in th e tra d itio n ally bureaucratic p osts o f president,
vice president, secretary, treasurer, and legal representative. These w ould be
elected an n u ally at a D ecem ber gathering o f the general m em bership during
which census rolls would also be generated. M on th ly contributions from m em
bers paid for the m eetings o f the cabildo, w hich was then charged w ith planning
investm ents and divesting lands, i f desired, w hile encouraging the “m oral, intel
lectual, and m aterial benefit o f the com m un ity,” a som ew hat nebulous charge
harkening back to the nin eteenth-century hacendados paternal responsibilities
for h is indigenous charges.92 T hese m eetings were private, and w hile, techni
cally, the public could add item s to th e agenda, the requisite su pp ort o f one-
third o f the cabildo’s constituents proved d ifficu lt to gather in practice.93
The strength en ed cabild o o f S a n ta C la ra de S a n M illá n m ain ta in ed a
p rogram o f intensified in fra s tr u c tu r a l d evelopm en t over th e n e x t decade.
New challenges appeared w ith the B anco del P ich in ch as developm ent o f the
bordering sector o f the Pam bach upa h acien d a into the C iu d ad ela Pichincha,
a project th at led to an extended law suit concerning water rights. R isin g land
values again sparked interest in private divestm ent o f land and in tern al political
challenges, issues that u n d erlay the 1940 constitu tion o f an alternate cabildo
spearheaded by Federico T u m ip am b a ’s two sons, as d iscu ssed earlier. These
conflicts, which potentially threatened the san ctity o f the com m u n ity given the
regional strength o f the fin an cial in stitu tio n and the problem o f legitim ation,
once again led the cabildo to deploy a m ultipronged strategy involving entrepre
neurial savvy, intensive p oliticking, and an attention to fixin g the narrative of
com m unity history. I have already m entioned Federico T u m ip am ba’s backroom
deal w ith h is sons to increase their political p articipation in the cabildo; sim ilar
attention to coalition b u ild in g appears to have cu rtailed the co n flict w ith the
bank as well. In this case, the im petus m ay have been a rad ical sh ift in national
politics. The trium ph o f the G lorious R evolution in M ay 1944 brought populist
leader José M aría Velasco Ibarra back to pow er in Ecuador w ith the support of
num erous indigenous polities incorporated u n d er the Federación Ecuatoriana
de Indios (FEI). T h is situation presented San ta C lara w ith a d ilem m a because
the new president’s brother, Pedro Velasco Ib arra, h ad overseen the Banco del
Santa Clara de San M illán / 205
pichincha during th eir recent con flicts over water rights. Federico T u m ip am b a,
who had taken over as cabildo president du ring the 1940s, responded b y sending
a congratulatory letter to the new governm ent and extend ing an in vitatio n to
the ban k to collaborate on a new avenue bisectin g its lan d s. N am ed for form er
president Isidro A yora, the new street represented an acknow ledgm ent o f the
benefits to expand ing the arteries connecting San ta C lara’s properties w ith the
new C iudad ela Pichincha on its lim its.94
S itu a tin g S an ta C la ra w ith in h isto ric a l n arratives p roved a n im p o rta n t
tool to these enterprises. W h ile trad ition al form u las such as evocations o f the
“a n cestral” im p o rtan ce o f co m m u n al lan d s or references to ow nersh ip since
“tiempo inmemorial” continued to appear in cabildo depositions, a new attention
to m ainstream h isto ry follow ed. T h is sh ift bespeaks an awareness o f the legiti
m acy the com m u n ity’s extended legal existence afforded the M in istry o f S ocial
W elfare as w ell as its respect fo r p articu la r form s o f narrative an d evidence. The
new history-aw are stance proved cru cia l to ongoing internal disputes, as can be
seen in a tru n cated clash betw een Federico an d his nephew L u is T u m ip am b a
that erupted in M arch 1938, ju st m onths after the com m une’s official form ation.
Th is d ispute b egan w hen Federico chopped dow n eu calyp tu s saplings along
a w all each m an ow ned as p a rt o f the su b d ivisio n o f the C a talo m a p ro p e rty
w rested fro m José A n to n io T u m ip am b a a decade earlier. R ath er th a n sim ply
diagram the borders, Federico in stead provid ed a th irty -y e ar n arrative o f the
parcel’s adm instration. The detailed discussion o f the con flict w ith A n ton io T u
m ipam ba and the subsequent p artitio n delegitim ated L u is T u m ip am b a ’s case
b y h igh ligh tin g h is m ore recent c la im to the property. Federico fu rth e re d his
assault upon h is op p on en t’s tru stw o rth in ess b y noting th at L uis T u m ip am b a
h ad exaggerated the degree o f th e vio latio n b y stating th at an entire “ fo re st”
had been destroyed. T h is recourse to h isto rical and fac tu a l accu racy appealed
to the bureaucracy, and the sto ry was confirm ed after a truncated su rvey b y the
Teniente Politico.95
H istory also proved critical in the developm ent o f sh iftin g alliances w ith the
state, whose protection w ould prove invaluable as internal and extern al conflicts
raged. The person who appears to have taken the initiative in this area w as José
G abriel C o llah u aso, w hose statu s as a cabildo president w as b o lstered b y h is
sim ultaneous activities as an albañil, or m aster builder. T hese d ep loym en ts o f
h istoricity took m an y form s, d epending on the audience he sought to cultivate.
A longside the defense o f the cabildo genealogical narrative, C o llah uaso engaged
m ultip le bureaucratic o rgan ization s, a ll the w hile fra m in g the experience o f
h im se lf and h is com m un ity w ith in a “n atio n al” h istorical narrative.
Two p articu la rly strikin g incidents occurred d u rin g the G reat D epression.
Paradoxically, each appears to have engaged separate state polities. The first co
incided w ith the quadricenten nial o f the death o f A tah u alpa in 1533. C ollah u aso,
in conjunction w ith other m aster albañiles, collaborated w ith the conservative
m u n icip ality to erect a m onum en t to A tah u alp a at the su m m it o f the Panecillo.
206 \ Santa Clara de San M illán
C o llah u aso and his cohort m arched to the Panecillo to lay the cornerstone on
A u g u st 2 8 ,19 33. There, he delivered a speech fra m in g the m onum ent as an act
o f contrition for the republic’s previous lack o f com m itm ent to the slain Incan
leader and to h is heirs, the “raza indígena."96
M ercedes Prieto reads h is subsequent plea fo r a racial u n ity tem pered by
each c o m m u n ity ’s C h ristia n fa ith as in d icative o f a conservative underpin
n in g o f the entire event, a thesis bolstered b y the p articip ation o f the Centro
Católico de Obreros in the celebration. M oreover, that sam e year the m unicipal
ity oversaw a plethora o f san itized com m em orations o f A tah u alp a, including
athletic events and rom antic p oetry declam ations.97 However, the long-standing
relationship o f C o llah uaso an d the San ta C lara cabildo w ith the M inisterio de
Previsión S ocial suggests intim ate fa m ilia rity w ith the socialist indigenista idea
o f A ta h u a lp a as an alternate fou n d in g father. M oreover, C o llah u aso and his
fellow m asons also levied a call for an eight-hour workday, w hich was a central
goal o f the Socialist Party. These observations suggest th at C ollah u aso deployed
his knowledge o f m ultiple constructions o f indigenous and n ation al h istory in
order to secure broader socioeconom ic gains, addressing both the conservative
m u n icip ality and the socialist m in istry at once.
A sim ilar attem pt to take advantage o f h isto rically inflected considerations
o f legitim acy can be seen in the strategy C o llah u aso in itiated w hen faced with
the prospect o f an alternate cabildo in 1940. In h is com m u nications with the
m in istry, the cabildo president interrogated the dissenting faction’s understand
ing o f the com m u n ity’s statutes and requested th at these be d istributed to the
m em bership. Significantly, C ollah u aso ju stified this relatively expensive request
b y rem in d in g the m in ister o f the great prestige o f Santa C lara, which stemmed
fro m “ its strong organization and [its heritage as] one o f the first to receive ju
rid ical status in Ecuador du ring the last days o f the governm ent o f General Eloy
A lfa ro , precursor o f m odern legislation protecting peasant com m unities”98
C o llah u aso ’s form u lation is strikin g. N ot on ly does he underscore the ef
ficacy (and therefore legitim acy) o f the cabild os governing practices but he also
identifies the cabildo’s origins w ith a hero o f rad ical lib eralism — Eloy A lfaro,
who is h igh lighted as the precursor o f the contem porary social legislation de
fendin g peasant com m unities. These statem ents tie Santa C lara, its cabildo, its
statutes, and its econom ic activities to a m acronarrative o f social reform . This
linkage exists not on ly in the reference to A lfa ro but also in the m anipulation of
coded language, such as the identification o f Santa C lara de S an M illá n with a
peasant com m unity rather th an an indigenous com m une. W hile “peasant com
m u n ity ” is a m isnom er for w hat was actu ally a m ixed population o f agricultural
w orkers, lu m b er m erchants, a rtisan s, and sm all-scale real estate speculators,
the use o f the epithet served its purpose: to legitim ize the cabildo in the eyes of
the socialist bureaucrats o f the M in istry o f Social W elfare. A s such, it ensured
the co m m u n ity’s ongoing place w ith in an u rb an fabric th at increasingly turned
its back on traditional m odes o f production and socialization.
Santa Clara de San M illán / 207
2 11
212 \ Postscript
bowler hat and bushy m ustache to advertise p rogram s such as litter collection
and cultural events. Today, the Teatro V ariedades h as been renam ed in honor
o f the com ic actor, and revivals o f h is classic p erfo rm an ces occu r regularly.
His daughter h as even established a You T ube ch ann el dedicated to h is work.3
The p op u larity o f this a rtfu l chulla stem s fro m his ethos: a picaresque rogue
traipsing through the public square. T h is figure h ad , in fact, a unique chrono-
topical gaze defined by his breezy am bivalence to the trappings o f m odern life.
In h is study o f the chronotope, Bakh tin rem inds us th at the figure o f the rogue,
fool, or clown originated w ith in the carnivalesque entertainm ents o f the clas
sical and m ed ieval w orlds. Besides subvertin g the m onotony o f everyday life,
these characters “create around them selves th eir ow n special little world, their
own chronotope,” w hich inverts and interrogates the conventions o f polite so
ciety through carnivalesque inversion. A s such, rogues can critique a culture
through laughter and irony and in the process bare its peculiarities, foibles, and
hierarchies.4
Don Evaristo serves this fu n ctio n precisely as he tu rn s the tables on the fig
ures o f his contem porary city, from chapitas (police officers), to traperos (street
vendors) to A lam ed a P a rk ’s statue o f Sim ón B olívar, w hom Evaristo im agines
m ust be eternally bored because he can never d ism o u n t h is steed (brioso corcel).
A favorite victim o f Evaristo, especially o f h is skills as an am ateur pickpocket,
is an obtuse gringo who foo lish ly em ploys h im as a tou r gu ide and receives in
retu rn a flu rry o f m isin form ation am id a series o f h ijin ks. E l G rin go ends up
in scrapes like a C arn ival water fight, fro m w hich the tw o emerge drenched but
victorious after successfully storm ing a townhouse.
T hese satirical p ortraits are rich in d eta il and interw oven w ith the sites,
traditions, and encounters com m on to G arcía M u ñ o z’s m od ernizin g city. And
yet they seem to escape the staid conventions o f b o th p o sitivist an d nostalgic
discourses. The plu cky D on Evaristo acknowledges the d ialogical nature o f the
surveyed city, where h y p o c risy an d contrad iction ab ou n d and life is at once
m odern and traditional, fo rm al and burlesque. T h is p la y fu l approach to time
an d space and to social m arkers gives the estampas th eir p artic u la r flavor. For
exam ple, upon passing beneath the sixteen th -cen tu ry A rco de la R eina, Don
Evaristo m uses, “ I w ould have lik ed to contem plate th is A rch in earlier times,
before the arrival o f electric light. I figure it w ould have been a special place for
rom antic liaisons, gangster am bushes, and stabs in the back. Today, civilization,
w ith its p o w erfu l ‘osram s,’ deflowers the d ark, im p ed in g the shadows to cover
love, th eft, an d m urder.”5 T h is ironic view o f electric ligh tin g— as hindrance
to rom ance, robbery, an d m u rd er— u n d ercu ts the glow o f m od ernization as
m an ifested b y p ow erfu l O sram -brand lightbulbs. Yet Evaristo is not sentimen
tal. H is contem plation o f the arch durin g its h eyd ay inspires a self-consciously
anachronistic portrait in w hich contem porary characters, such as the gangsters
o f A m erican cinem a, have in tru d ed on the age o f the cloak and dagger. Fusing
Q uito’s contem porary existence w ith its past em beds his tale w ith in a permeable
Postscript / 213
h istorical m a trix w ith a global p u rview en com passing b oth p o p u lar an d h igh
culture.
A sse rtin g the inseparable ju xtap o sition o f the m odern an d the trad ition al
has been associated w ith a postm od ern sensibility b u t is also integral to tra d i
tional p ositivist fram ew orks.6 Quiteños fro m across social, racial, and p olitical
divides acknow ledged these contradictions. H owever, d isagreem ent existed as
to the currency o f a given “p ast,” “present,” or “ fu tu re.” I have dem arcated a se
ries o f constellations o f accepted and repudiated narratives adopted b y specific
groups and shaped by th eir ch ron otopical organization. A lth o u gh in flu en ced
by h istoric allian ces o f a p olitical or socioeconom ic natu re, these b o u n d aries
proved d istin ctly porous. These h eu ristically developed chronotopes gathered
into their orbit a series o f utterances associated w ith authors and audiences o f
ten separated in tim e and space. A s B ak h tin notes, in the “w orld represented in
the w ork,” a d ialogical process envelops these “real w o rld ” actors:
The work and the world represented in it enter the real world and enrich it,
and the real world enters the work and its world as part o f the process of its cre
ation, as well as part of its subsequent life, in a continual renewing o f the work
through the creative perception o f listeners and readers. O f course this process
of exchange is itself chronotopic: it occurs first and foremost in the historically
developing social world, but without ever losing contact with changing histori
cal space. We might even speak o f a special creative chronotope inside which this
exchange between work and life occurs, and which constitutes the distinctive life
of the work.7
Thus, society and its stories m u tu ally constitute one another. A culture’s ch ron o
topes prove generative in bo th a literary and a social sense, in d elibly m ark in g
the w orld fro m w hich th ey origin ate as they are encountered, re-encountered,
and renewed by authors and audiences. B y extension, those engaging a conversa
tion that stretches across tim e an d space jo in a group o f what m igh t be term ed
chronotopical producers.
W ith G arcía M u ñ o z’s estampas, d ia lo g ism stem s fro m th e p o lyvalen ce o f
m ultiple chronotopes inflected b y an extended h isto ry o f refraction an d renew al
that continues to the present. T h is h isto ry begins w ith G arcía M uñoz h im se lf,
whose w ritings owe a debt to a length y tradition o f satirical sketches articu latin g
an ironic sensibility know n as sal quiteña. T h is epithet originated in nineteenth-
century feuilletons and has also been associated w ith the tradiciones o f H isp an ist
C ristóbal G angotena or the D ad aist en n u i o f A lb erto C olom a S ilv a .8 W ith the
estampas, however, this sal passed from the page to the boards to television and
the Internet— at each stage altered and rew ritten b y m ultiple authors an d au d i
ences. T h is process o f destru ction and renewal feeds the genre and perpetu ates
the chronotope. T racin g the publics and producers im plicated in the d evelo p
m ent o f the estampa— n in eteenth-cen tu ry h u m o rists, G arcía M u ñoz, Ernesto
214 \ Postscript
fam ily or the comuna o f Santa C lara de San M illá n m ost directly illustrates this
point. Both groups freq u en tly spu n th eir h isto ry (both d iscursively and spa
tially) to adapt to sh ifting social, political, econom ic, or cu ltu ral circum stances.
The D urin is could construct a b u ild in g th at went from being an expression of
elite sophistication to a declaration o f a h ybrid A n d ea n vern acu lar depending
on the m om ent and the audience. Federico T u m ip am b a and José G abriel Colla
huaso pivoted between perform ances o f deferential or defiant indigen eity while
articulating an A lfa rista , proto-socialist, or neo-Incaic identity. The polyphony
o f these iterations at tim es threatened to devolve into absu rd ity; however, the
generic fram ew ork offered a m ask o f stab ility and consistency. In the case o f the
D u rin is, this façade concerned their identity as cosm opolitan interlocutors; in
the case o f Santa C lara, the autonom ous com m une, w ith its traditional leaders
proudly at the helm , provided a central leitm otif.
T h is nim ble m an ip u latio n o f h isto ry reflected an entrep reneu rial appro
priation o f the past com m on not only to San ta C lara and the D u rin is b ut also
to institutional actors. The various institu tions benefited fro m addition al state
support yet achieved this su pp ort on ly because o f th eir ab ility to craft a chrono
topical fram ew ork that afforded them legitim acy an d enabled them to reach p o
litical as w ell as economic goals. Such was the case o f the H ispan ist gaze o f the
N ational A cadem y o f H istory, which reconsidered the in tellectu al tradition of
Iberian exceptionalism while articu latin g a special m illen arian role for Quito.
Sim ilarly, the m u n icip al cou n cil and the m ilita r y ’s cartograp h ers refracted
colonial adm in istrative stru ctu res an d the city and nation’s u niqu e role in the
developm ent o f geographic science to carve out new spaces for com m ercial and
political enterprise. Finessing the past and id en tifyin g places an d sites infused
w ith it therefore provided not on ly a legitim izing fram e bu t also concrete finan
cial and social benefits.
The elasticity o f a given chronotope also opened it to the charge o f hypoc
risy, w hich fueled a counter-cartographic series o f coordinates underscoring the
phantasm agorical attributes o f the idyllic Q uito. The poetics o f denunciation
advanced b y Q uito’s detractors h igh ligh ted the c ity ’s estrangem ent from the
course o f global h isto ry. S p a tial m etaphors equ ating th e n ation al and global
h in terlan d as a space o f p o ten tial red em p tion tran scen d ed m y ria d stylistic
attributes, from rom anticism to su rrealism . A sense o f irony invigorated popu
la r and literary w orks th at p u t forth negative view s o f Q uito an d the nation,
b egin n in g w ith critical interrogation o f a p ositivist spirit in the works o f Mera
or Bustam ante but becom ing a palpable source o f satirical w it in P alacios for
m al experim ents or Salvador’s absurdist gestures. L aughter’s potential to invert
social hierarchies enlivened the chronotope an d accen tuated its potential to
chastise the solipsistic flavor o f the city’s intellectual clim ate.
The criticism inherent w ith in the p hantasm agorical chronotope highlights
the possibility o f refraction an d alteration o f a given chronotope once it entered
the public sphere. Indeed, such d ialogism increased as the narratives discussed
Postscript / 217
P r e lu d e
84-85. See also Nele Bemong et al., eds., Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Re
flections, Applications, Perspectives (Ghent, Belgium: Academia Press, 2010).
5. Maurice Halbwachs, The Collective Memory, trans. Francis J. Ditter Jr. and
Vida Yazdi Ditter (New York: Harper & Row, 1980). See also Pierre Nora, ed., Realms
of Memory: Rethinking the French Past, 3 vols. (New York: Columbia University Press,
1996-1998); and Svetlana Boym, The Future of Nostalgia (New York: Basic Books, 2001).
6. Bakhtin distinguishes between major and minor chronotopes: minor chronotopes
are motivic in nature while major chronotopes are generic, that is, genre-producing.
Bakhtin, “Forms of Time.” See also Jay Ladin, “Fleshing Out the Chronotope,” in Criti
cal Essays on Mikhail Bakhtin, ed. Caryl Emerson (New York: G. K. Hall, 1999), 212—36;
and Nele Bemong and Pieter Borghart, “ Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope:
Reflections, Applications, Perspectives,” in Bakthin’s Theory, ed. Bemong et al., 7—8.
7. On metahistory, see Hayden V. White, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in
Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973).
8. On vecindad and early modern citizenship, see Tamar Herzog, Defining Nations:
Immigrants and Citizens in Early Modern Spain and Spanish America (New Haven: Yale
University Press, 2003).
9. A. Kim Clark, The Redemptive Work: Railway and Nation in Ecuador, 1S95—1930
(Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1998).
10. See Lucas Achig, El proceso urbano de Quito: ensayo de interpretación (Quito: Cen
tro de Investigaciones; CIUDAD, 1983); Fernando Carrión, Quito: crisis y política urbana
(Quito: CIUDAD; Editorial El Conejo, 1987); and Manuel Castells, City, Class, and Power,
trans. E. Lebas (New York: St. M artin’s Press, 1978).
11. Milton Luna Tamayo, Historia y conciencia popular: el artesanado de Quito, eco
nomía, organización, y vida cotidiana, 1890-1930 (Quito: Corporación Editora Nacional,
1989); Guillermo Bustos, “Quito en la transición: actores colectivos e identidades cul
turales urbanas (1920—1950),” in Enfogues y estudios históricos: Quito a través de la historia,
by Paul Aguilar et al. (Quito: Editorial Fraga, 1992), 163—88; Manuel Espinosa Apolo,
Mestizaje, cholificación y blanqueamiento en Quito primera mitad del siglo X X I (Quito: Uni
versidad Andina Simón Bolívar Ecuador, Abya-Yala, Corporación Editora Nacional,
2003).
12. Eduardo Kíngman Garcés, La ciudad y los otros, Quito 1860—1940: higienismo, or
nato y policía (Quito: FLACSO, 2006).
13. See, e.g., Jeffrey D. Needell, A Tropical Belle Epoque: Elite Culture and Society in
Turn-of-the-Century Rio de Janeiro (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987); Te
resa A. Meade, “Civilizing" Rio: Reform and Resistance in a Brazilian City, 1889-1930 (Uni
versity Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997); and, to a lesser degree, John
Lear, Workers, Neighbors, and Citizens: The Revolution in Mexico City (Lincoln: University
of Nebraska Press, 2001).
14. Jorge Hardoy, ed., Urbanization in Latin America: Approaches and Issues (Garden
City, NY: Anchor Books, 1975); Jorge Hardoy and Richard Morse, eds., Rethinking the
Latin American City (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; Baltimore: Johns
Notes to Pages xx—8 / 221
Hopkins University Press, 1993); and Richard Morse, New World Soundings: Culture and
Ideology in the Americas (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989).
15. Tenorio Trillo, “1910 Mexico City”; Marisol de la Cadena, Indigenous Mestizos:
The Politics of Race and Culture in Cuzco, Peru, 1919-1991 (Durham, NC: Duke University
Press, 2000); Overmyer-Velázquez, Visions of the Emerald City.
16. Luis Roniger, “Global Immersion: Latin America and Its Multiple Modernities,”
in Globality and Multiple Modernities: Comparative North American and Latin American
Perspectives, ed. Luis Roniger and Carlos H. Waisman (Brighton, UK: Sussex Academic
Press, 2002), 79—105.
C h a p t e r 1. T h e P o lit ic s a n d P o e t i c s o f R e g i o n a l i s m
9. Susan V. Webster, Arquitectura y empresa en el Quito colonial: José Jaime Ortiz, Ala
rife Mayor (Quito: Abya-Yala, 2002), 49.
10. See Lane, Quito 1599, xi—xiii. See also Thomas B. F. Cummins and William B.
Taylor, “The Mulatto Gentlemen of Esmeraldas, Ecuador,” in Colonial Spanish America:
A Documentary History, ed. Kenneth M ills and William B. Taylor (Wilmington, DE:
Scholarly Resources, 1998), 147—49.
11. The most comprehensive study of Quito’s sculpture remains Gabrielle G. Palm
er’s Sculpture in the Kingdom of Quito (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press,
1987).
12. Carmen Fernández-Salvador, “Images and Memory: The Construction of Col
lective Identities in Seventeenth-Century Quito” (PhD diss., University o f Chicago,
2005), esp. chap. 3.
13. The origins of the controversy lay in Isaac Newton’s gravitational theories, which
predicted that the Earth could not be a pure sphere but would instead be elliptical.
14. For recent scholarship considering La Condamine’s European views o f the exotic
American landscape, see Neil Safier, Measuring the New World: Enlightenment Science
and South America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008); Deborah Poole, Vision,
Race, and Modernity: A Visual Economy of the Andean Image World (Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 1997); and Jorge Cañizares-Esguerra, “Postcolonialism avant la lettre?
Travelers and Clerics in Eighteenth-Century Colonial Spanish America,” in After Span
ish Rule: Postcolonial Predicaments of the Americas, ed. Mark Thurner and Andres Guer
rero (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003), 89-109.
15. Extensive scholarly analysis of the Rebellion of the Barrios began to appear
around 1990. Scholars have alternately characterized the rebellion as an anticipation
of the southern Andean strife o f the 1780s, as a moment of great racial tension, as a
moment o f subaltern racial harmony, and as predominantly urban or involving signifi
cant participation from the corregimiento. For more on the uprising, see Kenneth J. An-
drien, “Economic Crisis, Taxes, and the Quito Insurrection of 1765,” Past and Present 129
(November 1990): 104—31; Anthony McFarlane, “ The ‘Rebellion of the Barrios’: Urban
Insurrection in Bourbon Quito,” Hispanic American Historical Review 69:2 (May 1989):
283—330; and Martin Minchom, The People of Quito, 1690—1810: Change and Unrest in the
Underclass (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994).
16. A concise discussion of Espejos use of satirical prose can be found in Julie Greer
Johnson, Satire in Colonial Spanish America: Turning the New World Upside Down (Austin:
University of Texas Press, 1993). See also Reinaldo Mino, Eugenio Espejo y la defensa de los
indios (Quito: Sistema Nacional de Bibliotecas, 1995); and Visión actual de Eugenio Espejo
(Quito: Fundación Eugenio Espejo/Fundación Friedrich Naumann, 1988).
17. On Rocafuerte and the Cortes de Cádiz, see works by Jaime E. Rodriguez O.:
The Emergence of Spanish America: Vicente Rocafuerte and Spanish Americanism, 1808-1832
(Berkeley: University o f California Press, 1975); and The Independence of Spanish America
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
18. Marie-Danielle Demalas and Yves Saint-Geours elaborate on Cuenca’s role as
an intellectual and political arbiter in their work Jerusalen y Babilonia: religión y política
Notes to Pages 11—14 / 223
en el Ecuador, 1780-1880, trans. Carmen Garatea Yurí (Quito: Corporación Editora Na
cional, 1988), 32. For the population of its district and relative importance in the early
nineteenth century, see Julio Carpió Vintimilla, La evolución urbana de Cuenca en el siglo
XIX (Cuenca: Universidad de Cuenca [IDIS], 1983), esp. 75—83.
19. M ark J. von Achen, King of the Night: Juan José Flores and Ecuador, 1824—1864
(Berkeley: Univeristy of California Press, 1989).
20. Rafael Quintero and Erika Silva, Ecuador: una nación en ciernes, 3rd ed. (Quito:
Abya-Yala, 1998), 74.
21. Unlike the other cities, Loja did not contend to be the center of a new national
government. Not having the wealth or position from which to form an independent
state, lojanos called for a federal system with more provincial autonomy.
22. Quintero and Silva, Ecuador, 82. Quintero and Silva’s analysis of the installa
tion of a neo-Iberian state evokes similar arguments concerning the continuity of ad
ministrative structures, commented upon most concisely by Fran^ois-Xavier Guerra in
Modernidades e independencias: ensayos sobre las revoluciones hispánicas (Madrid: Editorial
M APFRE, 1992), albeit at a temporal distance of some decades.
23. Derek Williams, “Negotiating the State: National Utopias and Local Politics
in Ecuador, 1845—75” (PhD diss., State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2001).
24. Jean Paul Deler, “Estructuración y consolidación del área central (1830—1942),”
in Jean Paul Deler, Nelson Gómez, and Michel Portáis, El manejo del espacio en el Ecuador:
etapas claves (Quito: Centro Ecuatoriano de Investigación Geográfica, 1983), 187—91.
25. Ricardo D. Salvatore and Carlos Aguirre, “The Birth of the Penitentiary in Latin
America: Toward an Interpretive Social History of Prisons,” in The Birth of the Peniten
tiary in Latin America: Essays on Criminology, Prison Reform, and Social Control, 1830—1940,
ed. Ricardo D. Salvatore and Carlos Aguirre (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1996),
11.
26. Alexandra Kennedy Troya and Alfonso Ortiz Crespo, “Continuismo colonial y
cosmopolitismo en la arquitectura y el arte decimonónico ecuatoriano,” in Nueva histo
ria del Ecuador, vol. 8, Época republicana II, ed. Enrique Ayala Mora (Quito: Corporación
Editora Nacional/grijalbo, 1990), 124—31.
27. See Williams, “ Negotiating the State.”
28. The number of children attending school in the countryside rose from 13,459
in 1867 to 32,000 by 1875. See Enrique Ayala, “Gabriel Garcia Moreno y la gestación del
estado nacional en el Ecuador,” Cultura 4:10 (May—August 1981): 163.
29. On souvenirs, see Blanca Muratorio, “ Nación, identidad y etnicidad: imágenes
de los indios ecuatorianos y sus imagineros a fines del siglo X IX ,” in Imágenes e imagi
neros: representaciones de los indígenas ecuatorianos, siglos X IX y XX, ed. Blanca Muratorio
(Quito: FLACSO, 1994), 150.
30. For an introduction to Montalvo, see Roberto Agramonte, La filosofía de Mon
talvo (Quito: Banco Central del Ecuador, 1992). See also Arturo Andres Roig, Pensa
miento social de Juan Montalvo: sus lecciones al pueblo (Quito: Editorial Tercer Mundo,
1984). A selection of his writings can be found in Galo René Pérez, ed., Montalvo (Quito:
Banco Central, 1985).
224 \ Notes to Pages 14—16
31. Garcia Moreno is the most frequently studied individual in Ecuadorian history.
His dramatic death captured the imagination of conservatives not only in Ecuador but
across the world, and his martyrdom became a favorite subject, inspiring countless bi
ographies, tributes, and historical dramas in Europe and the rest o f South America,
particularly during the fin-de-siglo. See, e.g., Agustine Berthe, Garcia Moreno: les héros
martyr (Paris: Retaux-Bray, 1890): M. T. Josefa, García Moreno, president de la république
de VEquateur (Paris, 1892); Giacinto Simonato, “Dio non muore!" Garcia Moreno, drama
storico in 4 atti (Milan: G. Daviero, 1933); Manuel Galvez, Vida de don Gabriel García
Moreno (Buenos Aires: Editorial Difusión, 1942). A strong contemporary biography is
Peter V. N. Henderson, Gabriel Garcia Moreno and Conservative State Formation in the
Andes (Austin: University o f Texas Press, 2008).
32. Native Ecuadorian cacao could grow only in the rather deep topsoil found near
the many rivers that cross the coastal plains. The new variety, cacao Benezuela, on the
other hand, could grow without difficulty in drier, hilly areas. Nonetheless, it was a
weaker species and less resistant to disease, a factor that ultimately served to decimate a
large portion of the crops of the late 1910s. See Lois Crawford de Roberts, El Ecuador en
la época cacaotera: respuestas locales al auge y colapso en el ciclo monoexportador, trans. Erika
Silva and Rafael Quintero (Quito: Editorial Universitaria, 1980), 49—54,165—70.
33. The most extensive study on the cacao period is still Lois Crawford de Roberts’s
El Ecuador en la época cacaotera, which presents an analysis of cacao growth patterns,
Ecuador’s role in international markets, and the fortunes of the Guayaquil cacao elite.
Andrés Guerrero’s Los oligarcas del cacao: ensayo sobre la acumulación originaria en el Ecua
dor; hacendados cacaoteros, banqueros exportadores y comerciantes en Guayaquil (1890-1910)
(Quito: El Conejo, 1980) elaborates a M arxist critique of the accumulation of wealth in
the industry’s development. Guayaquil’s development in the late nineteenth and early
twentieth centuries has been well covered by Ronn F. Pineo, Social and Economic Reform
in Ecuador: Life and Work in Guayaquil (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1996).
Pineo stresses the importance o f both the city’s monoculture dependency and regional
ism to Guayaquil's fin-de-siglo labor and economic history.
34. For more on Juan León Mera, see Xavier Michelena, Juán León Mera: antología
esencial (Quito: Banco Central/Abya-Yala, 1994); and Julio Pazos Barrera, ed., Juan León
Mera: una vision actual (Quito: Corporación Editora Nacional, 1995). The term serrano
refers to inhabitants of the Andean section of Ecuador.
35. Remigio Crespo Toral, “Modesto Espinosa, Semblanza,” in Biblioteca ecuatoriana
minima: prosistas de la república (Puebla, Mexico: Editorial J. M. Cajica Jr., i960), 439-46.
See also José Modesto Espinosa, Obras completas, vol. 1, Artículos de costumbres (Freiburg,
Germany: B. Herder, 1899).
36. The similarity of the work of Guerrero and Fuentes was the subject of an exhibi
tion, “Quito-Lima: Siglo X IX ,” held at the Centro Cultural Metropolitano in Quito,
October 23—November 14, 2002.
37. Claudio Malo González, “ Histos en la plástica cuencana del siglo X X ,” in De
la inocencia a la libertad: arte cuencano del siglo XX, ed. Andrés Abad Marchán (Cuenca:
Banco Central del Ecuador, 1998), 47—49.
Notes to Pages 16—20 / 225
drade Coello, Del Quito antiguo (Quito: Imprenta “Ecuador,” 1935); Modesto Chavez
Franco, Crónicas del Guayaquil antiguo (Guayaquil: Imprenta Municipal, 1930); Cristóbal
Gangotena y Jijón, Al margen de la historia: leyendas de frailes, picaros y caballeros (Quito:
Imprenta Nacional, 1924); J. Gabriel Pino Roca, Leyendas, tradiciones y páginas de historia
de Guayaquil (Guayaquil: Editorial Jouvin, 1930).
C h a p te r 2. M a p p in g th e C e n te r o f th e W orld
1. J. B. Harley, The New Nature of Maps: Essays in the History of Cartography, ed. Paul
Laxton (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001). Besides seminal essays such
as “Silences and Secrecy: The Hidden Agenda of Cartography in Early Modern Europe,”
“Maps, Knowledge, and Power,” and “Deconstructing the Map,” the collection also in
cludes J. H. Andrews’s critique of Harley’s methodology. For a consideration o f Harley’s
(mis)use of Foucaldian and Derridean concepts of textuality, see Barbara Belyea, “Im
ages of Power: Derrida, Foucault, Harley,” Cartographica 29:2 (summer 1992): 1—9.
2. See Denis Wood with John Fels, The Power of Maps (New York: Guilford Press,
1992); and Denis Wood and John Fels, The Natures of Maps: Cartographic Constructions of
the Natural World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008). See also Denis E. Cos
grove, ed., Mappings (London: Reaktion Books, 2001); and Emanuela Casti, Reality as
Representation: The Semiotics of Cartography (Bergamo, Italy: Bergamo University Press—
Sestante, 2000). A n ongoing debate on the deconstruction of cartography can be found
in the University of Toronto’s eminent journal Cartographica, particularly the essays in
the special issues of spring 1993 (“ Introducing Cultural and Social Cartography”) and
autumn—winter 1998 (“Cartography and Statecraft”).
3. John Pickles, A History of Spaces: Cartographic Reason, Mapping, and the Geo-Coded
World (London: New York: Routledge, 2004).
4. Raymond B. Craib, Cartographic Mexico: A History of State Fixations and Fugitive
Landscapes (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004). See also Jordana Dym and
Karl Offen, eds., Mapping Latin America: A Cartographic Reader (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2011).
5. Kagan, with Marias, Urban Images of the Hispanic World.
6. Barbara Mundy, The Mapping of New Spain: Indigenous Cartography and the Maps
of the Relaciones Geográficas (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).
7. The omniscient “G od ’s-eye view” of planar projections has been treated elo
228 \ Notes to Pages 27-34
quently in Pickles, History of Spaces. For the encounter between European and Andean
cosmographic views, see Mignolo, Darker Side of the Renaissance, chaps. 5—6.
8. Brading has analyzed the development of a sense of differentiation between cre
ole and peninsular Spanish citizens that began soon after colonization and deepened
as Spanish culture became more rooted in the American landscape. See D. A. Brading,
The First America: The Spanish Monarchy, Creole Patriots, and the Liberal State, 1492-1867
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991). A synthesis of these arguments can be
found in D. A. Brading, “Patriotism and the Nation in Colonial Spanish America,” in
Constructing Collective Identities & Shaping Public Spheres: Latin American Paths, ed. Luis
Roniger and Mario Sznajder (Brighton, UK: Sussex Academic Press, 1998), 13—45.
9. Kagan, with Marias, Urban Images in the Hispanic World, 129—31.
10. See Phelan, Kingdom of Quito, 177—95, on Mariana de Jesus.
11. Fernández-Salvador, “Images and Memory,” esp. chap. 3.
12. Pedro de Mercado, Historia de la Provincia del Nuevo Reino y Quito de la Compañía
de Jesus, vol. 3 (Bogotá: Biblioteca de la Provincia de Colombia, 1957).
13. On Cantuña’s chapel and the socioreligious significance of this somewhat apoc
ryphal figure, see Susan Verdi Webster, “The Devil and the Dolorosa: History and Leg
end in Quito’s Capilla de Cantuña,” The Americas 67:1 (July 2010): 1—30.
14. See Fernández-Salvador, “Images and Memory,” chap. 3, esp. 157—77.
15. See Safier, Measuring the New World; and Brading, First America, 422—28.
16. La Condamine’s orientalizing vision has been treated by numerous scholars.
See Safier, Measuring the New World; Poole, Vision, Race, and Modernity; and Cañizares-
Esguerra, “Postcolonialism avant la lettre?”
17. On Humboldt’s time in Ecuador, see Segundo E. Moreno Yáñez, Alexander von
Humboldt: diarios de viaje en la Audiencia de Quito, trans. Christiana Borchat de Moreno
(Quito: Occidental Exploration and Production, 2005). See also M ary Louise Pratt, Im
perial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2008);
and Laura Dassow Walls, The Passage to Cosmos: Alexander von Humboldt and the Shaping
of America (Chicago: University o f Chicago Press, 2009).
18. On Quito during the Colombian period, see María Susana Vela Witt, El Departa
mento del Sur en la Gran Colombia, 1822-1830 (Quito: Abya-Yala, 1999). The relevant laws
can be found in Cuerpo de leyes de la República de Colombia (Caracas: Valentin Espinal,
1840).
19. See Francisco Miranda Ribadeneira, La primera escuela politécnica del Ecuador:
estudio histórico e interpretación (Quito: Ediciones Feso, 1972); and Jorge Gómez R., Las
misiones pedagógicas alemanas y la educación en el Ecuador (Quito: Abya-Yala, 1993). A
firsthand account can be found in J. Gualberto Pérez, Recuerdo histórico de la Escuela
Politécnica de Quito (Quito: Tip. Prensa Católica, 1921).
20. Teodoro Wolf, Geográfica y geología del Ecuador (Leipzig: F. A . Brockhaus, 1892), 4.
zi. Pérez, Recuerdo histórico, 8.
22. Even though he was one of the most important architects and cartographers o
his day, no biographical study of Pérez exists. The most detailed information on his for
mative years can be found in Miranda Ribadeneira, La primera escuela, esp. 56,109—14,
Notes to Pages 35—41 / 229
352—53 • A. somewhat fanciful portrait of his ironic sense of humor can be found in A n
drade Coello, Del Quito antiguo.
23. El Municipio 3:36 (October 10,1887): n.p.
24. Ibid. The original quotation is “la oposición de la mayor parte de los dueños de
casa, que no permitían, se tomasen las medidas.”
25. El Municipio 3:37 (October 28,1887): n.p.
26. El Municipio 5:78 (October 30,1889): n.p.; 13:67 (December 31,1897): 532—33.
27. For an introduction to the literature on this topic, see Hobsbawm and Ranger,
Invention of Tradition; and Nora, Realms of Memory.
28. On cartographic commodification, see Catherine Delano-Smith, “The Map
as Commodity,” in Approaches and Challenges in a Worldwide History of Cartography, ed.
David Woodward, Catherine Delano-Smith, and Cordell D. K. Yee (Barcelona: Insti
tut Cartogràfic de Catalunya, 2000). See also James R. Akerman, “Twentieth-Century
American Road Maps and the Making of a National Motorized Space,” in Cartographies
of Travel and Navigation, ed. James R. Akerman (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
2006), 151—206.
29. On Peru, see de la Cadena, Indigenous Mestizos; and Poole, Vision, Race, and Mo
dernity. For Mexico, see Magali M. Carrera, “From Royal Subject to Citizen: The Ter
ritory of the Body in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Mexican Visual Practices,”
in Images of Power: Iconography, Culture and the State in Latin America, ed. Jens Ander-
mann and William Rowe (New York: Berghahn Books, 2005), 17—35; Craib, Cartographic
Mexico; and Mauricio Tenorio Trillo, Mexico at the World’s Fairs: Crafting a Modern
Nation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996). For a comparative example, see
Zeynep Çelik, Displaying the Orient: Architecture of Islam at Nineteenth-Century World’s
Fairs (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992).
30. Betty Salazar Ponce, “De hija a hermana . . . in Ecuador-España: historia y per
spectiva, ed. M aría Elena Porras and Pedro Calvo-Sotelo (Quito: Embajada de España,
2001), 152. See also La République de l’Équateur et sa participation à la Exposition Universelle
de 1900 (Paris: Imprimerie du “Correo de Paris,” 1900).
31. Brooke Larson, Trials of Nation Making: Liberalism, Race, and Ethnicity in the A n
des, 1810—1910 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 138—39.
32. Diario de Avisos, El Ecuador en Chicago (New York: A. E. Chasmar, 1894).
33. Higley prim arily worked for American businesses across Latin America, even
tually settling in Peru. See H. G. Higley, Map of the Mosquito Shore, Nicaragua, Central
America (New York: G. W. and C. B. Colton & Co., 1894); and H. G. Higley, Plano pan
orámico de la ciudad de Guayaquil (Guayaquil, 1899).
34. Walter William Ristow, American Maps and Mapmakers: Commençai Cartography
in the Nineteenth Century (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1985).
35. Mission du Service Géographique de VArmée pour la mesure d’un arc de méridien équa
torial en Amérique du Sud sous le controle scientifique de l'Académie des Sciences, 1899—1906,
multiple vols. (Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1910—1922).
36. Vacas Galindo’s conception o f the history of Ecuadorian territoriality is sum
marized in his first book, La integridad territorial del Ecuador (Quito: Tipografía y en-
230 \ Notes to Pages 4 1-5 1
cuadernación Salesiana, 1905). See also Manifesto de la Junta Patriótica Nacional (Quito:
Imprenta y encuadernación nacionales, 1910). For more about the history of the study of
territorial rights, see Adam Szászdi, “The Historiography of the Republic of Ecuador,"
Hispanic American Historical Review 44:4 (November 1964): 537—43.
3 7 . “Acta de la primera Junta preparatoria,” Boletín de la Sociedad Geográfica de Quito
1:1 (1911): 66—67; “El Registro Civil,” Boletín de la Sociedad Geográfica de Quito 1:1 (1911):
74 —7 5 ; “La Región Oriental,” Boletín de la Sociedad Geográfica de Quito 1:1 (1911): 77—78.
38. Luis G. Tufiño, Servicio Geográfico del Ejercito Ecuatoriano y la única base práctica
en ¡os estudios de la facultad de ciencias (proyecto) (Quito: Imprenta y Encuadernación Na
cionales, 1911), 1—4 ,16 —26.
39. “Informe del Secretario General de la Sociedad Geográfica de Quito, Señor
Francisco Talbot, presentado al finalizar el primer año social de 1910 a 1911,” Boletín de la
Sociedad Geográfica de Quito 1:1 (1911): 92—98.
40. Tenorio notes the lack of destruction in the planning o f the Porfirian capital,
which stands in stark constrast to the Western European example. Instead, he describes
the expansion o f the city as a process o f colonizing the environs and underscores the
particularly racist imagination behind the plan and its discrediting of the existing in
habitants, that is, peasants. See Tenorio Trillo, “1910 Mexico City,” 86.
41. Carrera Andrade, El volcán y el colibrí, 21—22.
42. Archivo Nacional del Ecuador (hereafter ANE): Civiles, i° El Sagrario X X V III
(July 28,1909).
43. Jose D. Laso, Quito a la vista (Quito: J. D. Laso and J. R. Cruz, 1911); and Quito a
la vista, segunda entrega (Quito: J. D. Laso and J. R.Cruz, 1912).
44. Angel Emilio Hidalgo and Maria Elena Bedoya, “Guayaquil y Quito: la imagen
deseada, 1910—1930,” Boletín de la Biblioteca Municipal de Guayaquil 87 (2003): 169—79.
45. Humberto Peña Orejuela, Guia de Bolsillo de Quito (Quito: Talleres Tipográficos
Nacionales, 1920). Subsequent editions appeared throughout the 1920s and 1930s, with
the last coming out in 1940.
46. J. Enrique Ribadeneira and Luis Cornelio Diaz V., Cien años de legislación militar,
1830—1930 (Quito: Editorial Gutenberg, 1930), 27.
47. Froilán Holguín Balcázar, Plano comercial de Quito (Quito, 1920). For more on
Holguin’s life, see Froilán Holguin Balcázar, Mi capricho de hacerme hombre (Guayaquil:
Editorial Senefelder, 1936), esp. 15—22, where he details his first journey to Guayaquil.
48. Gaceta Municipal 10:94 (February 4,1922): 11—12.
49. This ordinance also echoes the similar performance of gratitude displayed by
the municipality when presenting Gualberto Pérez with a medal upon its acceptance of
his map of the city in 1888.
50. For more on the 1922 celebrations, see Ernesto Capello, “ The City as Anachro
nism: Remembering Quito in the Liberal Era” (MA thesis, University of Texas at Aus
tin, 2001), 63—72.
51. See Luís T. Paz y Miño, Apuntaciones para una geografía urbana de Quito (Mexico
City: Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia, i960); Guía para la historia de
Notes to Pages 52—62 / 231
C h a p t e r 3. H i s p a n i s m o
Epigraph: Julio [Giulio] Aristide Sartorio, “ La ciudad de Quito es un Joyero,” Alas, De
cember 1934, 21. Sartorio was an Italian painter who visited Quito in 1924. The original
text reads, “La ciudad de Quito es un joyero precioso y germen espiritual, testigo de los
lazos que unen al Ecuador con la latinidad renaciente. Quito, sin arte gótico, que nació
para el futuro, no se deje defraudar jamás por la presionante modernidad y conserve
para el porvenir puro de la América Latina la forma y el alma con el cual nació.”
policy in the nineteenth-century Caribbean through the lens of national history writ
ing in The Conquest of History: Spanish Colonialism and National Histories in the Nineteenth
Century (Pittsburgh: University o f Pittsburgh Press, 2006). For Mexican Hispanism, see
Ricardo Pérez Montfort, Hispanismo y Falange: los sueños imperiales de la derecha española
(Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1992). A full-length study of Ecuadorian
Hispanism has yet to be developed. A n introductory sketch can be found in Guillermo
Bustos, “El Hispanismo en el Ecuador,” in Ecuador-España, ed. Porras and Calvo-Sotelo.
See also Ernesto Capello, “Hispanismo casero: la invención del Quito híspano,” in Proce-
soS: revista ecuatoriana de historia 20 (fall 2003—spring 2004); and Guillermo Bustos, “La
hispanización de la memoria pública en el cuarto centenario de fundación de Quito,”
in Etnicidad y poder en los países andinos, ed. Christian Büschges, Guillermo Bustos, and
Olaf Kaltmeier (Quito: Corporación Editora Nacional, 2007), 111—34.
3. On the ethnic composition of the city center, see Carrion, Quito: crisis y política
urbana; Kingman Garcés, La ciudad y los otros; and Espinosa Apolo, Mestizaje.
4. Cañizares-Esguerra presents an intriguing analysis of European images of the
barbaric American wilderness in his comparison of Spanish and Puritan attitudes
toward a landscape peopled with demons and satanic forces. See Jorge Cañizares-
Esguerra, Puritan Conquistadors: Iberianizing the Atlantic, 1550—1700 (Stanford, CA: Stan
ford University Press, 2006). Other extensive discussions of this religious and cultural
encounter include Brading, First America; Patricia Seed, Ceremonies of Possession in Eu
rope’s Conquest of the New World, 1492—1640 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1995); Serge Gruzinski, Images at War: Mexico from Columbus to Blade Runner (1492—2019),
trans. Heather MacLean (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001); Richard Morse,
“Cities as People,” in Rethinking the Latin American City, ed. Morse and Hardoy, 3-19;
and John Leddy Phelan, The Millennial Kingdom of the Franciscans in the New World
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970).
5. See Kenneth R. Mills, Idolatry and Its Enemies: Colonial Andean Religion and Extir
pation, 1640—1750 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997).
6. José Joaquín Olmedo, Obra poética (Quito: Editorial Casa de la Cultura Ecuato
riana, 1971), 78.
7. Although the indigenous coerced labor system known as the mita was repealed
during the Cortes, Olmedos were some of the earliest pleas for its abolition, which were
met with skepticism. For more on his time in Cádiz, see Luis Andrade Reimers, Olmedo:
el estadista (Quito: Editorial Ediguias, 1993), 48-50.
8. For example, consider Huayna Capac’s opening speech: “¡Guerra al usurpador!
— ¿Qué le debemos? / ¿luces, costumbres, religión o leyes . . . ? / ¡Si ellos fueron estúpi
dos, viciosos, / feroces y por fin supersticiosos! / ¿Qué religión? ¿la de Jesús? . . . ¡Blas
femos! / Sangre, plomo veloz, cadenas fueron / Los sacramentos santos que trajeron. /
¡Oh religión! ¡oh fuente pura y santa / de amor y de consuelo para el hombre! / ¡cuántos
males se hicieron en tu nombre!” Olmedo, Obra poética, 165.
9. Rodríguez, Emergence of Spanish America.
10. A clear summary of the events surrounding Flores’s attempted mission can be
Notes to Pages 64—66 / 233
21. The growing number of these studies also found resonance in Latin America.
For example, the Spanish scholar M. Romera Navarro published a book in 1917 detailing
the history and growth of North American Hispanist studies. See M. Romera Navarro,
El hispanismo en Norte-Ame'rica: exposición y crítica de su aspecto literario (Madrid: Rena
cimiento, 1917).
22. In the early work Our America, for instance, he conceives o f the new American
man as being characterized by multiplicity and creativity. However, he soon began to
find even more creativity south of the border. For a good discussion of this aspect of his
thought, and the transition to Hispanophilia, see Ricardo Fernández Borchart, Waldo
Frank: un puente entre las dos Américas (Coruña, Spain: Universidade da Coruña, 1997),
22—37.
23. Despite Frank’s contribution to the widening of the American audience for Latin
American literature, Irene Rostagno notes that his literary sympathy with the classical
authors of the nineteenth and early twentieth century and consequent disdain for the
more avant-garde writings of the early vanguardia “reinforced the prevailing notion of
Latin American literature as provincial, local color writing.” Irene Rostagno, Searching
for Recognition: The Promotion of Latin American Literature in the United States (Westport,
CT: Greenwood Press, 1997), 15. Although Rostagno is correct, Frank’s regard for the
romantic tradition should be viewed as an outgrowth of a strong tradition of hispanistas
revering provincial life for its own sake, from Clarín to Güiraldes to Gálvez, and not
merely as a reactionary attitude toward contemporary literature.
24. Jeane Delaney, “The Discovery of Spain: The Hispanismo of Manuel Gálvez,”
in Bridging the Atlantic: Toward a Reassessment of Iberian and Latin American Cultural
Ties, ed. M arina Pérez de Mendiola (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996),
74- 79-
25. See “A los escritores ecuatorianos," Unión Iberoamericana, February 10,1888,16,
about the library; and “La Unión Iberoamericana,” Unión Iberoamericana, January i,
1888, 4, about their vision of regional conflicts. See “Tratado de comercio entre España
y el Ecuador,” Unión Iberoamericana, March 15,1888, 22—23, concerning the group’s ef
forts toward securing the treaty. See “ Tratados suscritos entre el Ecuador y España,
1840-2001,” in Ecuador-España, ed. Porras and Calvo-Sotelo, 250, regarding the signing
of the protocol to secure such a treaty.
26. Good studies o f González Suárez include Enrique Ayala Mora, “Introduc
ción,” in Federico González Suárez: la polémica sobre el estado laico, ed. Enrique Ayala Mora
(Quito: Corporación Editora Nacional, 1980); and Castillo Illingworth, La iglesia y la
revolución liberal.
27. See Marcelino Menéndez Pelayo, Epistolario, multiple vols. (Madrid: Fundación
Universitaria Española, 1981—1989), esp. 6:215, 343; 7:289, 335; and 19:293, 541.
28. See Varela, La novela en España, 31, for a discussion of how Menéndez Pelayo in
herited these values from his early teachers, especially Joaquim Rubió, and also 50-54,
for a greater explication of Menéndez Pelayo’s providential philosophy. For González
Suárez, see Gabriel Cevallos García, La historia en el Ecuador, in Reflexiones sobre la his-
Notes to Pages 68-72 / 235
toria del Ecuador, primera parte (Quito: Ediciones del Banco Central del Ecuador, 1987),
188-89.
29. As he put it in the introduction to the Historia general, “La historia, como en
señanza moral, es una verdadera ciencia, que tiene un objeto nobilísimo, cual es hacer
palpar á los hombres el gobierno de la Providencia divina en las sociedades humanas.”
See Federico González Suárez, Historia general de la República del Ecuador (rpt., Quito:
Edit. Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana, 1969), 1:22.
30. González Suárez, Historia general, 1:25.
31. His only discussion o f independence came in various speeches and pamphlets
scattered throughout the era. In these, he stressed that the organic growth of the Ecua
dorian nation led to a necessary separation from Spain, thus downplaying the abrupt
ness of the break. For a good example o f these ideas, see “Discurso pronunciado el día 10
de agosto de 1881 en la Catedral de Quito,” in Federico González Suárez, Obras oratorias
(Quito: A YM ESA , 1992), 193—211.
32. González Suárez, Historia general, 1:1049—102.
33. Federico González Suárez, Historia general de la República del Ecuador, vol. 2 (rpt.,
Quito: Edit. Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana, 1970). The key passages are in chap. 10 of
Tomo IV.
34. Reginaldo M. Duranti, La veracidad del Señor Doctor Don Federico González Suárez
en orden a ciertos hechos referidos en el Tomo IV de su Historia general (Santo Domingo:
privately printed, 1894), v, 37—43. See also Pedro Schumacher, Teocrada o demoniocracia?
Cristo o Lucifer? Quién vencerá? Quién como Dios! 2nd ed. (Freiburg, Germany: B. Herder,
1897).
35. See “Defensa de mi criterio histórico,” ín González Suárez, Historia general,
vol. 3.
36. “ De la actitud que conviene a los católicos seglares en el Ecuador en las
circunstancias presentes” (1908), in Homenaje del Comité Central a la memoria del
Excmo. Y Rvdmo. Sr. Dr. Dn. Federico González Suárez, M eritisimo Arzobispo de Quito
en el primer centenario de su nacimiento (Quito: Imprenta de la Universidad Central,
1944)-
37. Luna Tamayo, “Orígenes del movimiento obrero,” 289—92.
38. Szászdi, “Historiography of the Republic,” 514—15.
39. Jacinto Jijón y Caamaño, “ Examen crítico de la veracidad de la Historia del Reino
de Quito del P. Juan de Velasco de la Compañía de Jesús," in Boletín de la Sociedad Ecu
atoriana de Estudios Históricos Américanos 1:1 (June—July 1919): 33—63. See also Pío Jara-
millo Alvarado, El indio ecuatoriano, 3rd ed. (Quito: Talleres Gráficos del Estado, 1936);
Szászdi, “ Historiography of the Republic,” 506—11.
40. Jacinto Jijón y Caamaño, Política conservadora, vol. 1 (Riobamba: La Buena
Prensa del Chimborazo, 1929), 128—29.
41. Ibid., 1:147.
42. Julio Tobar Donoso, Catolicismo social (Quito: Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1936); Gar
cía Moreno y la instrucción pública (Quito: Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1940); Las relaciones en-
236 \ Notes to Pages 72—76
tre la iglesia y el estado Ecuatoriano: resumen histórico (Quito: Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1938);
Monografías históricas (Quito: Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1938).
43. Isaac Barrera, Relación de las fiestas del primer centenario de la batalla de Pichincha,
1822—1922 (Quito: Talleres Tipográficos Nacionales, 1922),
44. Archivo Gangotena Jijón, Quito (hereafter AGJ), 07-04, Notas 1 (G) Varios años,
Quito, Currículo vitae; AGJ/Q, 08-18, Epist. 1 Varios Siglo X X , June 10,1929.
45. Gangotena y Jijón, Al margen de la historia. See also Ernesto Capello, “City,
Chronicle, Chronotope: Re-Constructing and Writing Old Quito,” Journal of Latin
American Urban Studies 6 (fall 2004): 41—43.
46. González Suárez, Historia general, vol. 3, 401—2.
47. No biography of Navarro exists, but useful sketches can be found in Centro de
Estudios Pedagógicos e Hispanoamericanos de Panama, Summary of Ten Lectures on
Ecuadorian Art by José Gabriel Navarro (Panamá: Centro de Estudios, 1935); and in Jorge
Salvador Lara’s contribution to José Gabriel Navarro, Estudios históricos (Quito: Grupo
Aymesa, 1995).
48. For example, see José Gabriel Navarro, La escultura en el Ecuador (siglos XVI al
XVIII) (Madrid: Real Academia de Bellas Artes de San Fernando, 1929), esp. 4, or his
essay on the works included in the 1930 Madrid exhibition devoted to Spanish art in the
Indies. See Sociedad Española de Amigos del Arte, Aportación al estudio de la cultura es
pañola en las Indias: catálogo general ilustrado de la Exposición (Madrid: ESPASA-CALPE,
1930).
49. Sociedad Española, Aportación al estudio de la cultura española, 61—62.
50. Susan Webster has noted substantial indigenous influence on the decorative as
pects of many of Quito’s main churches, especially in the seventeenth- and eighteenth-
century temples like El Sagrario, Guápulo, and La Compañía. She argues that this arose
from the fact that Spanish overseers paid less attention to façade and columnar decora
tion. See Webster, Arquitectura y empres, 49.
51. Schmidt-Nowara, Conquest of History, 130—60, esp. 134—35,150—54.
52. The original reads “edificios espléndidos, conventos e iglesias de rara magnifi
cencia, cuadros y estatuas, mobiliario civil y religioso en cantidad formidable, joyas de
delicada orfebrería, etc.. . . era un testigo mudo que abonaba en [la defensa de España].”
José Gabriel Navarro, “El Estado Actual de los Estudios Históricos en el Ecuador y su
importancia para la historia de España,” in Navarro, Estudio históricos, 47.
53. José Gabriel Navarro, “El municipio de América durante la asistencia de Es
paña,” in Navarro, Estudios históricos, 177—82.
54. The original quotations are “la unión de los Quiteños en el culto al pasado” and
“Quito se perpetuará por su peregrina belleza en la devoción del extranjero curioso y
será siempre un centro de turismo.” José Gabriel Navarro, “De cómo Quito sería siempre
un centro de turismo,” El comercio, August 11,19 26 ,3.
55. Juan de Dios Navas E. and Julio Tobar Donoso, Discursos de ingreso y recepción en
la Academia Nacional de Historia el 6 de enero de 1927 (Quito: Tipográfica de la “Prensa
Católica,” 1927), 41-42.
56. See Capello, “City as Anachronism,” 52—72.
Notes to Pages 78—82 / 237
76. There is an ironic nature to this statue's history, as it was erected on May 2 4 , that
is, the anniversary of Quito’s liberation from the Spanish. See Gonzalo Zaldumbide,
“ Sebastián de Benalcázar,” in Zaldumbide, Significado de España en América, ensayos
(Quito: Letramía, 2002), 115—29.
77. The institute’s Web site can be accessed at http://iech.tripod.com.
78. Carlos Jaramillo Abarca, “Quito, 468 años de historia,” El comercio, December
7, 2002, A5.
79. “Ecuador/Quito," LOC/PP, NYWTS-Subj/Geog.
80. Benjamín Gento Sanz, Guia del turista en la iglesia y convento de San Francisco de
Quito (Quito: Imprenta Americana, 1940).
81. Gaceta municipal 26:97 (August 10,1940): 7.
82. J. M. González de Valcárcel, Restauración monumental y “puesta en valor" de las
ciudades americanas (Architectural Conservation and Enhancement of Historic Towns in
America) (Barcelona: Editorial Blume, 1977).
C h a p t e r 4 . G o v e r n a n c e a n d t h e S o v e r e ig n C a b i l d o
1.The original quote is “esta capital ha sido muy desatendida.” “Carlos Freire Z. al
Presidente del Concejo,” El municipio 12:1 (December 20,1895): 1—2.
2. Achig, El proceso urbano de Quito; Carrión, Quito: crisis y política urbana.
3. Kingman Garcés, La ciudad y los otros.
4. de la Cadena, Indigenous Mestizos; Overmyer-Velázquez, Visions of the Emerald
City.
5. See Herzog, Defining Nations, for a genealogy of kinship networks across the
Quito region.
6. On cabildo politics, see Pilar Ponce Leiva, Certeza ante la incertidumbre: élite y ca
bildo de Quito en el siglo X V II (Quito: Abya-Yala, 1998), esp. 364—74, 430—31. See also
Minchom, People of Quito, 35—37, on the cabildos participation in the local elite’s en
croachment on indigenous common lands in the eighteenth century.
7. Federica Morelli, “Las reformas en Quito: la redistribución del poder y la conso
lidación de la jurisdicción municipal (1765-1809),’’ in Jahrbuch fü r Geschichte von Staat,
Wirtschaft und Gessellschaft Lateinamerikas, no. 34 (1997): 193-206.
8. Enrique Ayala Mora, “El municipio en el siglo X IX ," in ProcesoS: revista ecuato
riana de historia, no. 1 (1991): 72. For a discussion of the role of the municipality in and
after independence, see Federica Morelli, Territorio 0 nazione: riforma e dissoluzione dello
spazio imperiale in Ecuador, 1765-1830 (Soveria Mannelli, Italy: Rubbetino Editore, 2001),
chap. 5. This situation was not unique to Quito, as has been noted in Guerra, Moderni
dad e independencias.
9. Ayala Mora, “ El municipio," 80—81.
10. “Ley de régimen municipal —1878,” in Colección de leyes, ordenanzas y contratos
(Guayaquil: Imprenta Americana, 1890), 24—27.
11. Ibid., 28.
12. See Pineo, Social and Economic Reform, chap. 4.
Notes to Pages 89—93 / 239
70. “ Transacción —El Supremo Gobierno del Ecuador v. The Anglo French Pacific
Sindicate Limited,” Gaceta municipal 12:10 (February 8,1925): 176—80.
71. “ Decretos Legislativos —1,” Gaceta municipal 11:8 (November 30,1925): 135-36.
72. Barrera, Relación de las fiestas del primer centenario, 74—76.
73. Manuel J. Calle, Leyendas del tiempo heroico: episodios de la guerra de la independen
cia (Guayaquil: Imp. de “El Telégrafo,” 1905), 229—31.
74. “ Se dispone que la ‘Junta del Centenario de la Batalla de Pichincha’ y la ‘Junta
Patriótica del Centenario,’ se denominen, en lo sucesivo, ‘Junta de Embellecimiento de
Quito’ y ‘Junta de Mejoras y Obras Públicas de Guayaquil,’ respectivamente, y se es
tablecen nuevas rentas para la Junta en primer término citada,” in Municipalidad de
Guayaquil, Colección de leyes, decretos, ordenanzas, resoluciones y contratos, correspondientes
a esta municipalidad y correspondientes al año de 1922 (Guayaquil: Imprenta Municipal,
1923), 30—32, microfilm, New York Public Library.
75. Paz y Miño Cepeda, Revolución juliana, 41—43.
76. “Decretos Legislativos —3,” Gaceta municipal 11:8 (November 30,1925): 136—37.
77. “ Decretos de la Junta de Gobierno Provisional —No. 31,” Gaceta municipal 12:10
(February 8,1926): 180-85.
78. “ Subvensión del Gobierno a la Municipalidad de Quito,” Gaceta municipal 23:91
(December 31,1938): 5-6.
79. The most comprehensive biography o f this enigmatic figure is Héctor Coral
Patiño’s Isidro Ayora (Quito: Abrapalabra Editores, 1995).
80. Drake, Money Doctor.
81. República del Ecuador, Ley de régimen municipal (Guayaquil: Imprenta y Talleres
Municipales, 1929), vii—xv.
82. The key article o f the party platform was no. 15, which called for “libertad y
autonomía de los Municipios, sin perjuicio de la vigilancia del Poder central.” Jijón y
Caamaño, Política conservadora, 2:177.
83. Adolfo Posada, El régimen municipal de la ciudad moderna (Madrid: Librería Ge
neral de Victoriano Suárez, 1916). See also Adolfo Posada, Escritos municipalistas y de la
vida local (Madrid: Instituto de Estudios de Administración Local, 1979).
84. Luna Tamayo, “Orígenes del movimiento obrero,” 289—92.
85. Jijón y Caamaño, Política conservadora, 2:187.
86. Ibid., 1:122—23.
87. “Necesidad de mantener la ley de autonomía municipal,” Gaceta municipal 16:38
(April 30,1931), 265—67.
88. Ana María Goetschel, “Hegemonía y sociedad (Quito: 1930—1950),” in Ciudades
de los Andes: visión histórica y contemporánea, ed. Eduardo Kingman Garcés (Quito: CIU
DAD, 1992), esp. 319-24, 340-42.
89. Quoted in Kingman Garcés, La ciudad y los otros, 299.
90. A. Kim Clark, “Race, ‘Culture,’ and Mestizaje: The Statistical Construction of
the Ecuadorian Nation, 1930—1950," Journal of Historical Sociology 11:2 (June 1998): 189.
See also Kingman Garcés, La ciudad y los otros, 309—25, on Suárez’s efforts to promote
hygiene.
Notes to Pages 10 7-113 / 243
91. Lucía Símonelli, “Jacinto JijónyCaamañoy el Barrio Obrero,” TRAMA55 (1991): 39.
92. Ibid., 40.
93. “A propósito de las Casas para Obreros,” Gaceta municipal 19:75 (May 31,1934):
201—2. See also Simonelli, “Jacinto Jijón,” 40—42.
94. “Comunicación del Concejo Provincial de Pichincha, relacionada con la queja
del Sr. Damián Miranda, a propósito de la Ordenanza sobre urbanización de los terre
nos del Jockey Club,” in Gaceta municipal 16:43 (September 30,1931): 111—14.
95. “Resolución de la Corte Suprema, a propósito de la Ordenanza que autoriza
formar un nuevo barrio, en terrenos del Jockey Club,” Gaceta municipal 17:52 (June 30,
1932): 211—13.
96. “Una resolución de la Corte Suprema de Justicia acerca de los nuevos barrios,”
in ibid., 205—7.
97. Daniel Zamudio, “Sobre el urbanismo moderno,” Gaceta municipal 19:72 (Fe
bruary 28, 1934): 71—81; Emilio Harth-Terre, “Asteriscos urbanos,” Gaceta municipal
21:80 (September 30,1936): 139—51.
98. J. Benítez, “Urbanización de ciudades,” Gaceta municipal 23:87 (January 31,1938):
9 9 -111.
99. “Comunicaciones Oficiales,” Gaceta municipal 23:91 (December 31,1938): 3—5.
100. “ Invítase al Sr. Armando Acosta y Lara, Decano de la facultad de Arquitectura
Urbanística de la ciudad de Montevideo, para que, en compañía del Director del Plan
Regulador de la misma ciudad, don Améríco Ricaldoni, visite la ciudad de Quito,” Ga
ceta municipal 23:93 (August 10,1939): 40—41.
101. “ Informe que el ingeniero uruguayo Sr. Armando Acosta y Lara, eleva al
Concejo, exponiendo sus ideas respecto a la urbanización de la ciudad,” Gaceta muni
cipal 23:94 (November 10,1939): 89—94. The Garden City movement, pioneered by the
English utopian planner Ebenezer Howard, held that cities ought to reintegrate nature
to mitigate the harshness o f industrial spaces. See Ebenezer Howard, Garden Cities of
Tomorrow (London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1902); and also Hall, Cities of Tomorrow, esp.
chap. 4.
102. The municipal report and the relevant articles in the local press are reprinted
in Gaceta municipal 23:94 (November 10,1939). See in particular the municipal rejection
of the project "La urbanización de la Ciudad y la derogatoria del Decreto de 4 de agosto
de 1938,” in ibid., i—vi, and El Comercio’s first article on the subject, “Senado aprueba
proyecto perjudicial a las aspiraciones de esta ciudad —Trata de privar al Concejo del
derecho de parcelar,” in ibid., 9.
103. Walter Domingo D., “Entrevista a Guillermo Jones Odriozola sobre el Plan Re
gulador de Quito de 1942-1944,” TR A M A 56 (January 1992): 34—41, esp. 35—36.
104. Guillermo Jones Odriozola, “Nociones urbanísticas y su relación con la ciudad
de San Francisco de Quito,” Gaceta municipal 27:102 (January 30,1942): 98—107.
105. For example, Carrión, Quito: crisis y política urbana; Kingman Garcés, La ciudad
y los otros; or Alfredo Lozano Castro, Quito: ciudad milenaria, forma y símbolo (Quito:
Ediciones Abya-Yala, 1991).
106. The 1941 congress deserves a more extensive study o f its own. Its minutes and
244 \ Notes to Pages 113—119
accords can be found in Primero Congreso de Municipalidades del Ecuador: actas, acuerdos
y resoluciones (Quito: Imprenta Municipal, 1942).
107. The Rio summit’s mandate to create hemispheric solidarity in the wake of the
Japanese invasion of Pearl Harbor marginalized Tobar’s mission. Several years later,
the national government attempted to rescind its agreement to the treaty, declaring it
null. Maps of Ecuador produced in the country thus continued to include the pre-1941
boundaries up until the late twentieth century, after a renewal of the armed conflict in
1996. A final peace accord was signed in 1998 under which Ecuador received access to
the Amazon. For a summary of the conflict, see Enrique Ayala Mora, Breve historia del
conflicto Ecuador-Peru (Quito: CDS, 1995).
108. Velasquismo as the epitome of Ecuadorian populism has been the subject of a
number of studies. One of the best recent studies, which focuses on the mixed popula
tion that placed the demagogue in power so many times, is Carlos de la Torre Espinosa,
La seducción velasquista (Quito: Libri Mundi/Grosse Luemern, FLACSO, 1997).
109. Municipio del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, Plan General de Desarrollo Ter
ritorial del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, Memoria Técnica, 2006-2010 (Quito: Imprenta
Municipal, 2006), 24.
C h a p te r 5. T h e D u r in i C o sm o p o lis
9. Gabriela Caicedo, “ Entre la plaza San Francisco de Quito y la Piazza San Marco
de Venecia," TR A M A 80 (2002): 36—39.
10. Kennedy Troya and Ortiz Crespo, “Continuismo colonial,” 126—27.
11. Paúl Aguilar, Quito: arquitectura y modernidad, 1850—1950 (Quito: Museo Munici
pal Alberto Mena Caamaño, 1995), 19.
12. El municipio 6:92 (July 17,1890): n.p.
13. One element of the problems surrounding the project concerned M inghetti’s
expulsion from the country during the anticlerical fervor of the revolution’s early days.
See Alfonso Cevallos Romero and Pedro M. Durini, Ecuador universal: visión desconocida
de una etapa de la arquitectura ecuatoriana (Quito: P. M. Durini R., 1990), 15—16.
14. Evelia Peralta, Quito: guía arquitectónica (Quito: I. Municipio de Quito—Junta de
Andalucía, 1991), 73.
15. Brünings extensive career forms an alternative pathway to the analysis provided
in this chapter. Instead of having to search for patronage, as did the Durinis, he secured
a place as prim ary architect for the Catholic Church, a position that allowed him to
refashion the temples o f the country, in particular a range of prominent structures such
as the basilica in the resort town o f Baños and the Quinche church, home o f the famous
Virgin o f Quinche. For more on his work, see Alfonso Cevallos Romero, Arte, diseño y
arquitectura en el Ecuador: la obra del Padre Brüning, 1899—1938 (Quito: Museos del Banco
Central del Ecuador/Abya-Yala, 1994).
16. Pedro M. Durini R., interview by author. In Ecuadorian parlance, the for
eign architects (and artists) who settled in the country are regularly referred to with
Hispanized names. Hence, Thomas Reed becomes Tomás Reed, Franz Schm idt
becomes Francisco Schmidt, and so forth. Information is not available about all of
these designers’ appellations, and, as a result, I have chosen to use the Hispanized
versions.
17. On consumption in Peru, see Paul Gootenberg, Imagining Development: Economic
Ideas in Peru’s “Fictitious Prosperity" of Guano, 1840-1880 (Berkeley: University o f Califor
nia Press, 1993).
18. Astrid Fischel, El Teatro Nacional de Costa Rica: su historia (San José, Costa Rica:
Editorial Teatro Nacional, 1992).
19. “Actas,” El municipio 19:177 (March 14,1903): 1493.
20. Lorenzo Durini to Pedro Durini, July 30,1903, MC/D: Cartas y Corresponden
cia, 12:3; Pedro M. Durini R., interview by author.
21. Caicedo, “Entre la plaza San Francisco de Quito y la Piazza San Marco de Vene
cia.” See also Maldonado, “La arquitectura de Quito,” 137.
22. El municipio 6:92 (July 17,1890): n.p. Eduardo Kingman correctly identifies this
as the first attempt to regulate ornament in Quito but mistakenly identifies it as having
been passed in 1880. See Kingman Garcés, La ciudad y los otros, 264.
23. Lorenzo Durini to M áximo Fernández, July 30, 1903; Lorenzo D urini to Pe
dro Durini, July 30,1903, both in MC/D: Cartas y Correspondencia, 12:1—2 and 12:3—5,
respectively.
246 \ Notes to Pages 126—133
24. Lorenzo Durini to Juan Durini, September 7,1903, MC/D: Cartas y Correspon
dencia, 12:31.
25. Lorenzo Durini to Juan Durini, September 22,1903, MC/D: Cartas y Corres
pondencia, 12:51.
26. Pedro M. Durini R., interview by author.
27. Lorenzo Durini to Máximo Fernández, July 30, 1903, MC/D: Cartas y Corres
pondencia, 12:2.
28. Lorenzo Durini to Francisco Durini, October 4,1903; Lorenzo Durini to Juan
Durini, September 7,1903, both in MC/D: Cartas y Correspondencia, 12:73 and 12:33,
respectively.
29. Cevallos Romero and Durini, Ecuador universal, 16.
30. “Contrato del Comité Diez de Agosto con Lorenzo Durini,” E! municipio 20:197
(September 7,1904).
31. Pedro M. Durini R., interview by author.
32. Cevallos Romero and Durini, Ecuador universal, 150—51.
33. Lorenzo Durini to Francisco Durini C., July 23,1906, MC/D: Cartas y Corres
pondencia, 32:16.
34. Pedro M. Durini R., interview by author.
35. Cevallos Romero and Durini, Ecuador universal, 141.
36. MC/D: Cartas y Correspondencia, 6. This copybook includes an inventory of
the store as well as a log of daily transactions.
37. Contrato, MC/D: Cartas y Correspondencia, 37:135-38.
38. Mario Canessa Oneto, 100 años de historia del tenis ecuatoriano (Guayaquil: Poli
gràfica C. A., 2000), 19—20. It is now known as the Quito Tennis and G olf Club. See also
Cevallos Romero and Durini, Ecuador universal, 141.
39. Pedro Durini to Francisco Durini, January 16,1907, MC/D: Cartas y Corres
pondencia, 2 2 :111; Cevallos Romero and Durini, Ecuador universal, 36. Genaro Larrea
would later be one of Francisco’s witnesses at his wedding in 1908 to Rosa Palacios. See
Elsa Susana Morales Moreno, Alicia Verónica Oña Velasco, and María Verónica Padrón
Cosíos, “Análisis histórico de la obra arquitectónica del Arq. Francisco Durini Cáceres
en la ciudad de Quito" (BFA thesis, Universidad Central del Ecuador, 2001), 11.
40. Pedro Durini to Francisco Durini, January 16, 1907, both in MC/D: Cartas y
Correspondencia, 22:111 and 22:112, respectively.
41. Cevallos Romero and Durini, Ecuador universal, 36—38.
42. MC/D: Cartas y Correspondencia, 10.
43. Froli had originally been commissioned to help with this work, but when Francisco
took over the business after Lorenzo’s death, he passed the contract to Capurro in part
because of Froli’s history of delays. Cevallos Romero and Durini, Ecuador universal, 55.
44. Francisco Durini to Pietro Capurro, May 1,1907, May 2,1907, both in MC/D:
Cartas y Correspondencia, 34:84—90 and 34:109, respectively; Cevallos and Durini,
Ecuador universal, 152—56. Capurro would again collaborate with Durini many years
later on works such as the Gonzalo Cordova mausoleum (1930). See Cevallos Romero
and Durini, Ecuador universal, 91.
Notes to Pages 134—145 / 247
45. Morales Moreno, Oña Velasco, and Padrón Círculo Militar, “Análisis histórico
de la obra arquitectónica del Arq. Francisco Durini,” 11; Aguilar, Quito: arquitectura y
modernidad, 46—47.
46. This dual training was a common trend among students in Milan. See Rich
ard A. Etlin, Modernism in Italian Architecture, 1890-1940 (Cambridge, M A: M IT Press,
1991), 9. D urini’s studies are mentioned in Lorenzo Durini to Juan Durini, September
9,1903, MC/D: Cartas y Correspondencia, 11:30—34.
47. “Oficios,” El municipio 22:241 (March 10,1906): 53-54.
48. “Actas,” El municipio 23:295 (December 26,1907): 395—97.
49. “Actas,” El municipio 23:297 (December 31,1907): 415; Pedro M. Durini R., inter
view by author.
50. MC/D: Cartas y Correspondencia, 23:7, 10 —11, 13, 40, 79—80, 88—89, 94» 99»
114 -15.
51. Cevallos Romero and Durini, Ecuador universal, 155.
52. On this period in M ilanese architecture, see Etlin, Modernism in Italian
Architecture.
53. MC/D: Libros de Consulta 4; Revistas 3, 7.
54. Valerie Fraser, Building the New World: Studies in the Modern Architecture of Latin
America, 1930—1960 (London: Verso, 2000), 44—46.
55. Pedro M. Durini R., interview by author. The plans and Trier’s designs are
housed at the Museo de la Ciudad. See MC/D: Planos y Dibujos, 29:145—47. See also
Aguilar, Quito: arquitectura y modernidad, 46—47; and Cevallos Romero and Durini,
Ecuador universal, 153—54. _
56. Aguilar, Quito: arquitectura y modernidad, 45; Cevallos Romero and Durini, Ecua
dor universal, 118—22; MC/D: Fotografías 75.
57. Aguilar, Quito: arquitectura y modernidad, 46—47. See also Espinosa Apolo, Mesti
zaje; and Kingman Garcés, La ciudad y los otros.
58. Ludwig Bemelmans, The Donkey Within (New York: Viking Press, 1941), 46—47.
59. Cam illa Fojas notes in her study on cosmopolitanism among Latin American
modernista authors that the engagement of characteristics from other places afforded the
possibility to transgress gender/sexual norms, which could be seen in a literary form ap
propriating and reconstructing a barrage of foreign styles. See Camilla Fojas, Cosmopoli
tanism in the Americas (West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2005), esp. 131-37.
60. A number o f these sample items have been preserved in the Durini collection
at the Museo de la Ciudad (MC/D) in the Revistas and the Libros de Consulta seríes.
61. MC/D: Revistas 9 ,1.
62. MC/D: Libros de Consulta2a; MC/D: Revistas 6; Pedro M. Durini R., interview
by author. See also MC/D: Planos, Dibujos, e Acuarelas.
63. Aguilar, Quito: arquitectura y modernidad, 50—51.
64. Pedro M . Durini R., interview by author.
65. Fraser, Building the New World, 15.
248 \ Notes to Pages 147-152
C h a p te r 6. A P h a n t a s m a g o r i c D y s t o p i a
1. No full biographical study of Calle exists at this writing, though there have been
several short works examining the life of the illustrious journalist. The best are by far
Alejandro Andrade Coello’s Manuel J. Calle, orientaciones periodísticas (Quito: Imprenta
"Ecuador,” 1919), which appeared soon after Calles death, and Diego Araujo’s introduc
tory essay to the collection Un forzado de las letras: antología de Manuel ]. Calle (Quito:
Ediciones del Banco Central del Ecuador, 1998).
2. Manuel J. Calle, “La semana,” Revista de Quito 7 (February 16,1898): 229—30.
3. Bakhtin, “Forms of Time,” 247—48.
4. Minchom, People of Quito.
5. This paragraph is based largely on Minchom, People of Quito, 215—20. See also
Federico González Suárez, Historia general de la República del Ecuador, vol. 5 (Quito: Im
prenta del Clero, 1901), 172—85.
6. Ruth Hill, “ The Roots o f Revolt in Late Viceregal Quito: Eugenio de Espejo be
tween Adam Smith and St. Rose,” Bulletin of Spanish Studies 86:7—8 (2009): 146.
7. On Espejos satires, see Johnson, Satire in Colonial Spanish America, 139—54.
8. See Ricardo Padrón, “Cumandá and the Cartographers: Nationalism and Form
in Juan León Mera,” Annals of Scholarship 12:3—4 (1998): esp. 226—27. See also Fernando
Balseca, “En busca de nuevas regiones: la nación y la narrativa ecuatoriana,” in Crítica
literaria ecuatoriana: antología, ed. Gabriela Pólit Dueñas (Quito: FLACSO, 2001).
9. See Clark, Redemptive Work.
10. Johnson, Satire in Colonial Spanish America, 143—52.
11. Ana María Goetschel, Educación de las mujeres, maestras y esferas públicas: Quito en
la primera mitad del siglo XX (Quito: FLACSO Sede Ecuador—Abya-Yala, 2007), 75—108.
12. Andrés Guerrero, La semántica de la dominación: el concertaje de indios (Quito: Edi
ciones Libri Mundi, 1991).
13. Francine Masiello, “ Melodrama, Sex, and Nation in Latin America’s Fin de
Siglo” in Theoretical Debates in Spanish American Literature, ed. David William Foster
and Daniel Altamiranda (New York: Garland Publishing, 1997), 181—90. See also Don
ald L. Shaw, A Companion to Modern Spanish American Fiction (London: Tamesis, 2002),
24.
14. The original text reads “bolsiconas desgreñadas; un viejecillo de ruin aparien
cia; pilluelos que iban silbando y . . . dos chullalevas con levitones largos y raídos, botas
torcidas y viejas, sombreros que habían conocido muchas cabezas.” Roberto Andrade,
Pacho Villamar (1900; rpt., Quito: Clásicos Ariel, n.d.), 20—21.
15. Luís A. Martínez, A la costa (1904; rpt., Quito: Clásicos Ariel).
16. Masiello, “Melodrama, Sex, and Nation,” 188.
17. Balseca has underscored M arianas place within a trend of eroticizing Afro-
Ecuadorians in twentieth-century Ecuadorian narrative. See Balseca, “En busca de
nuevas regiones,” 154.
Notes to Pages 152—155 / 249
18. Luís A. Martínez Holguin, Andinismo, artey literature (Quito: Abya-Yala; Nuevos
Horizontes, 1994).
19. Enrique Ayala Mora, Historia de la revolución liberal ecuatoriana (Quito: Corpora
ción Editora Nacional, 1994); Clark, Redemptive Work.
20. Although vastly skewed toward the cold war era, the only overview o f twentieth-
century student activism in Ecuador remains Patricio Ycaza’s Movimiento estudiantil:
¿para dónde camina? (Quito: Centro de Educación Popular, 1989).
21. See Chiriboga Alvear, Resumen histórico; and Luna Tamayo, “Origines del mov
imiento obrero.”
22. For an overview of this moment, see Ycaza, Movimiento estudiantil, 10 —11. An
extended account, including memorial testimonials, can be found in Aurelio Davila, El
25 de abril de 1907: recuerdos históricos (Guayaquil: “Popular,” 1909).
23. Cathy L. Jrade, Modernismo, Modernity, and the Development of Spanish American
Literature (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1998), 19. See also Angel Rama, La ciudad
letrada (Hanover, NH: Ediciones del Norte, 1984); and Julio Ramos, Desencuentros de la
modernidad en América Latina: literatura y política en el siglo X IX (Mexico City: Fondo de
Cultura Económica, 1989). Each work has also appeared in English translation.
24. Ernesto Noboa Caamaño, “ Hastío,” in Otros modernistas (Quito: Ariel, n.d.), 52.
The most comprehensive study o f the movement spawned by the generación decapitada
is Gladys Valencia Sala, El círculo modernista ecuatoriana: crítica y poesía (Quito: Univer
sidad Andina, Abya-Yala, 2007). See also Raúl Andrade, “Retablo de una generación
decapitada,” in El perfil de la quimera: siete ensayos literarios (Quito: Casa de la Cultura
Ecuatoriana, 1951), 65—105; Henri Michaux, Ecuador: A Travel Journal, trans. Robin Ma-
gowan (Seattle: University o f Washington Press, 1970), esp. 61-64; and Isaac J. Barrera,
Del vivir: reflexiones de juventud (Quito: Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1972), esp. 42, where he
disdains bohemianism as “el enemigo del talento."
25. Although it appeared for the first time in Letras, Bustamante’s novel was not
published independently until 1935, when the Fernández firm, Editorial L. I. Fernández,
finally brought the book to the greater public’s attention. This move formed part of the
company’s tendency to publish the growing number of works by Quito’s avant-garde, a
policy encouraged by Jorge Fernández, the son of the firm’s owner, him self a member of
the vanguardia and the author of a number of short stories and a novel about the early
Liberal years. Citations will be taken from the reprint edition: José Rafael Bustamante,
Para matar el gusano (1913; rpt., Quito: Editorial Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana, i960).
26. See Carrión, Quito: crisis y política urbana; Espinosa Apolo, Mestizaje; and esp.
Kingman Garcés, La ciudad y los otros.
27. The original text reads, “La callejuela, esquiva y solitaria, sube, se esconde y
desaparece por entre la áspera loma, cual si huyera del maltrato que las gentes le ha
cen sufrir, convirtiéndola en muladar y basurero allá abajo, en la ciudad, de donde ar
ranca. Triste y repugnante callejuela entre el cementerio y dos o tres casucas bajas y
melancólicas, mitad empedrada con piedras desiguales y toscas por las que se escurre
agua jabonosa que sale de las casas, mitad tierra con desmedrados hierbajos, basura
250 \ Notes to Pages 156—159
41. Although Palacio’s work was long ignored after he was ostracized from the liter
ary establishment following the turn toward social realism in the early 1930s, there has
been a major revalorization o f his writings since the 1980s. Numerous editions of his
collected works have appeared, as well as a series of articles recasting his work as some of
the most daring and important writing to have appeared in Ecuador. Citations from Pa-
lacio’s works are from Pablo Palacio, Obras completas, ed. Maria del Carmen Fernández
(Quito: Libresa, 1997). For an introduction to the recent criticism on Palacio’s writings,
see esp. Maria del Carmen Fernández, El realismo abierto de Pablo Palacio en la encruci
jada de los 30 (Quito: Ediciones Libri Mundi/Enrique Grosse-Luemern, 1991), as well as
her introduction to the edition of his collected works cited above. For a comparison of
Palacio and Salvador that focuses on their combative relationships with fellow socialists
and their distinct uses of psychoanalysis, see Wilfrido H. Corral, “Humberto Salvador y
Pablo Palacio: política literaria y psicoanálisis en la Sudamérica de los treinta,” in Crítica
literaria ecuatoriana, ed. Pólit Dueñas. For a review of avant-garde literature during the
era, see Robles, “La noción de vanguardia.”
42. Raúl Andrade in particular would later refer to the importance that the Dada
ist movement had in his conception of how to organize the magazine. See Fernández,
El realismo abierto, 56—57. On Egas’s time in Paris, see Michele Greet, Beyond National
Identity: Pictorial Indigenism as a Modernist Strategy in Andean Art, 1920-1960 (University
Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009), esp. 38—48. On Egas’s earlier exoticist
painting, see Trinidad Pérez, “Exoticism, Alterity, and the Ecuadorean Elite: The Work
of Camilo Egas,” in Images of Power, ed. Andermann and Rowe, 111—21.
43. The original text reads, “comprendemos que el Arte es la alquimia de la invero
similitud, porque si el Arte fuera la verdad, la expresión artística no existiría” and “cos
mopolitismo, audacia, autenticidad.” Gonzalo Escudero, “Hélice,” Hélice 1:1 (April 26,
1926): 1.
44. Greet, Beyond National Identity, 64—84.
45. Pablo Palacio, “Un hombre muerto a puntapiés,” in Palacio, Obras completas,
91—102; Palacio, “El antropófago,” in ibid., 103—11.
46. Fernández notes this similarity; see Palacio, Obras completas, i07n2. This story
anticipates Oswald de Andrade’s “Anthropophagite Manifesto” both in spirit and in the
use o f cannibalism as a metaphor.
47. Bakhtin, “Forms of Time,” 196. Bakhtin conceives of the carnivalesque as a mo
ment o f inversion in which traditional social relations can be subverted or overcome.
For an expanded account o f the importance of Carnival, see Mikhail Bakhtin, Rabelais
and His World, trans. Hélène Iswolsky (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984).
48. Like several of his fellow contributors to Hélice, Palacio joined the Socialist Party
following Egas’s departure and would become one of its central militants during the
1930s.
49. On Guignol, see http://amisdeguignol.free.fr/ (accessed November 25, 2010).
See also Richard J. Hand and Michael Wilson, Grand-Guignol: The French Theatre of
Horror (Exeter, UK: University of Exeter Press, 2002).
50. Pablo Palacio, Débora, in Obras completas, 178—81.
252 \ Notes to Pages 163—167
51. Elizabeth Coonrod Martinez, Before the Boom: Latin American Revolutionary Nov
els of the 1920s (Lanham, MD: University Press o f America, 2001), 72—88.
52. This text paragraph refers to Palacio, Debora, in Obras completas, 182—93.
53. The original text i;eads, “En verdad, puede ser muy pintoresco el que una calle
sea torcida y estrecha hasta no dar paso a un ómnibus; puede ser encantadora por su
olor a orinas, pude dar la ilusión de que transitará, de un momento a otro, la ronda de
trasnochados. Pero está más nuevo el asfalto y grita allí la fuerza de miles de hombres.”
Palacio, Débora, in Obras completas, 190.
54. Coonrod Martínez, Before the Boom, 85—86. See also Fernández’s editorial note
in Palacio, Obras completas, 207m.
55. Pablo Palacio, Vida del ahorcado, in Obras completas, 209—73.
56. José Otero, “Humberto Salvador: el hombre, sus temas y su creación” (PhD diss.,
University of New Mexico, 1970), 11—15.
57. See Corral, “Humberto Salvador y Pablo Palacio.”
58. Humberto Salvador, Ajedrez (Quito: Escuela de Artes y Oficios, 1929), 12.
59. “No se resignan a la vulgaridad de ser exactos.” Ibid., 12.
60. The original text reads, “Empezaré por localizarla. Es más difícil que adivinar
una carta al compañero, en la entusiasta partida en la que se apuesta mucho, localizar
a una persona en la clásica ciudad de San Francisco de Quito. Ella se nos escapa y para
alcanzarla, tenemos que correr desesperadamente a través de las calles. Por fortuna,
la carrera es menos penosa en el pavimento; pero, cuando llegamos a las calles empe
dradas, la persecución se vuelve dolorosa. Hay que renunciar a ella. El personaje se nos
escapa y ni el demonio puede encontrarla.” Humberto Salvador, En la ciudad he perdido
una novela, with an introduction by M aría del Carmen Fernández (1929; rpt., Quito:
Editorial Libresa, 1996), 91.
61. Salvador, En la Ciudad, 93—94. Maria del Carmen Fernández has noted that the
reference to the Apache compares modernity’s sudden force to the attacks perpetrated
by Apaches in many westerns of the era. Ibid., 94m. Apaches indeed appear throughout
the novel as symbols of barbarity, which presents an ironic contrast to the oft-lamented
fate of the Ecuadorian Indian.
62. The original reads, “marcos para el desnudo cubista de la voluptuosidad.” Sal
vador, En la ciudad, 133.
63. The original text reads, “Cada barrio simboliza una tendencia. . . . Novelas alu
cinadas, con corte de leyenda y prosa clásica, hay que encontrarlas en ‘El Tejar.’ Me
dioevales, en los claustros de ‘Santo Domingo’ o en ‘San Diego.’ Perversos, en el barrio
de ‘La Tola.’ Modernas, en las calles centrales, donde los autos son protagonistas de
todos los amoríos y de todos los amores. Románticas, en la sección de ‘La Alameda.’ Al
llegar al ‘Ejido,’ se vuelven naturalistas. El realismo se esconde como un gato en cual
quiera de las casas.
“La vanguardia se puede buscarla en la ciudad, a través de todos los barrios.” Salva
dor, En la ciudad, 219—20.
64. Robles, La noción de vanguardia, 55—69.
Notes to Pages 167—171 / 253
65. See Marc Becker, Indians and Leftists in the Making of Ecuador's Modern Indigenous
Movements (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008).
66. Federico A. Chalupa, “The Ecuadorian City and Modernity: Jorge Icaza’s
Quito,” in The Image of the City in Literature, Media, and Society, ed. Will Wright and
Steven Kaplan (Pueblo: Colorado State University—Pueblo, 2003), esp. 150—51.
67. José Carlos Mariátegui, Siete ensayos de interpretación de la realidad peruana (Lima,
1928; rpt., Montevideo: Biblioteca de Marcha, 1970), 171—80.
68. Moisés Sáenz, Sobre el indio ecuatoriano y su incorporación al medio nacional (Mex
ico City: Publicaciones de la Secretaria de Educación Pública, 1933), xi—xiii.
69. See Pablo Arturo Suárez, Contribución al estudio de las realidades entre las clases
obreras y campesinas (Quito: Imprenta de la Universidad Central, 1934), as well as A . Kim
Clark, “Race, ‘Culture,' and Mestizaje: The Statistical Construction of the Ecuadorian
Nation, 1930—1950,” Journal of Historical Sociology 11:2 (June 1998): 185—211, esp. 188-93.
70. Ricardo Descalzi, Historia critica del teatro ecuatoriano, 6 vols. (Quito: Editorial
Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana, 1968), 3:741—43, 788—90. See also Corral, “ Humberto
Salvador y Pablo Palacio,” 297—99.
71. Salvador’s thesis was soon published. See Humberto Salvador, Esquema sexual
(Quito: Imprenta Nacional, 1934). On Ecuador’s burgeoning feminist movement during
this era, see Goetschel, Educación de las mujeres; and Ana María Goetschel, ed., Orígenes
del feminismo en el Ecuador: antología (Quito: CONAM U; FLACSO; Municipio del Dis
trito Metropolitano de Quito; U N IFEM , 2006), 153—218.
72. “Como ellos quieren,” in Jorge Icaza, ¿Cuál es? Sin sentido (Quito: Su Librería,
1979)-
73. “¿Cuál es? “ in Icaza, ¿Cuál es? Sin sentido.
74. The original quotes are “era el amo, que todo lo puede en la comarca" and “con el
cura no era pecado.” Jorge Icaza, Huasipungo (1934; rpt., Quito: Ediciones Libresa, 1983),
123 and 137, respectively.
75. Jorge Icaza, En las calles (1935; rpt., Quito: Editorial El Conejo, 1985).
76. Ibid., 210.
77. A fter Bonifaz’s disqualification by Congress, armed bands from both the Right
and Left marauded in the streets for weeks until an insurrection in a nearby m ilitary
garrison led to four days of brutal fighting throughout the city in August 1932.
78. The original text reads, “A las diez, poco más o menos, llegó la figura haraposa
de un pordiosero, se rascó las ingles, la cabeza y los sobacos piojosos, hizo sonar unas
medallas— santos, vírgenes, cruces— y unos cuantos amuletos que llevada colgados en
el pecho, y, entre carajos y oraciones de su especialidad, se acurrucó como un ovillo
de trapos en el suelo. Más tarde apareció e hizo lo mismo que el mendigo un ciego
con un muchacho descalzo. Luego llegó un indio— cargador público en desgracia—
‘Cualquiera puede. Cualquiera puede, pes. Hasta el natural . . .’ pensó la tropa de hua-
sipungueros arrastrándose lentamente hasta el abrigo miserable del soportal. La noche
fue ventosa y fría, más igual o peor que en la choza del páramo. Felizmente ellos estaban
acostumbrados.” Icaza, En las calles, 20.
254 \ Notes to Pages 171—173
79. As a result, Salvador would still be criticized for not focusing enough on the
exploited rural Indian, as was the case in a review of Noviembre penned by Panamanian
Victor Hugo Escala in 1942; see also Otero, “Humberto Salvador,” 46—48. There have
been many studies of radical aesthetics in the interwar years; see esp. Beatriz Sarlo, Una
modernidad periférica: Buenos Aires, 1920 y 1930 (Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión,
1988); Nicola Miller, In the Shadow of the State: Intellectuals and the Quest for National Iden
tity in Twentieth-Century Spanish America (London: Verso, 1999); David Craven, Art and
Revolution in Latin America, 1910—1990 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002), chap.
2; and Fraser, Building the New World, regarding the establishment of an alternative
modernism and the dialogical relationship between global and local politics of modern
art and literature.
80. Humberto Salvador, Camarada (Quito: Talleres Tipográficas Nacionales, 1933).
81. Salvador’s attitudes toward homosexuality are somewhat obtuse. As Wilfrido
Corral has noted, Salvador condemns homosexuality as a societal evil in Esquema
sexual; however, he simultaneously develops an extensive discussion of the aesthetic
inspiration of homosexual encounters, dropping names as illustrious as Homer, Plato,
Zola, Balzac, and Romain Rolland. See Corral, “Humberto Salvador y Pablo Palacio,”
297—99; an(i Salvador, Esquema sexual, 251—55.
82. The original text reads, “Julia es pobre. No tiene derecho al placer.” Salvador,
Camarada, 183.
83. On the m inistry’s impact, see Valeria Coronel, “Orígenes de una Democracia
Corporativa: estrategias para la ciudadanización del campesinado indígena, partidos
políticos y reforma territorial en Ecuador (1925—1944),” in Historia social urbana: espacios
y flujos, ed. Eduardo Kingman Garcés (Quito: FLACSO —Ministerio de Cultura, 2009),
323-64.
84. Otero uses this terminology, taken from Salvador, to describe the seemingly
endless parade of beggars, prostitutes, lost bureaucrats, social climbers, and so forth,
that pervade his novels. See Otero, “Humberto Salvador,” chap. 6, “La vida sin vida.”
85. Humberto Salvador, Trabajadores (1935; rpt., Quito: Editorial El Conejo, 1985),
78-82.
86. The original text reads, “el último nido humano de la ciudad.” Ibid., 11. These
words appear on the opening page o f the novel, along with an embrace of the situation
by the narrator. Despite his brave front, the situation is untenable for all who live there.
Again, the influence of environment is paramount.
87. Salvador, Trabajadores, 100.
88. Ibid., 58—59.
89. The original text reads, “ La vida fue conmigo irónica. Porque realmente era una
ironía sangrienta el hecho de que un muchacho hambriento y andrajoso como yo, entr
ara a casas saturadas de lujo y comodidades.
“Hice un descubrimiento sensacional: el de que, junto al Quito desvalido que
yo conocía, había ‘otro’ Quito: el de los poderosos.
“Eran dos ciudades distintas, que por un sarcasmo de la vida, estaban muy cerca
Notes to Pages 174—179 / 255
C h a p t e r 7. S a n t a C l a r a d e S a n M i l l á n
Sta Clara de Sanm illan y la Sra Juana del Maso por terrenos, aguas, y servidumbres”;
and A N E, Indígenas, 176:5 (1858), “Causa seguida entre loa Sra Juna del Mazo y el co
mún de indígenas de Santa Clara de Sanmillan sobre terrenos.”
40. Pilar Pérez, “Cuando los montes se vuelven carbon: la transformación de los
paisajes en los alrededores de Quito, 1860—1940” (MA thesis, FLACSO-Ecuador, n.d.), 69.
41. A N E, Indígenas, 175:29 (1857), 2 ,11.
42. AN E, Indígenas, 176:5 (1858), 15.
43. Sattar, “Unresolved Inheritance,” chap. 3, esp. 116—17,127—31.
44. The last communication prior to the law’s passage came on October 12, 1857,
from Delgado. Between this time and mid-February, no written or oral communica
tions appear in the court record, which suggests the officials’ need to take stock of the
juridical impact of the new law.
45. Pérez, “Cuando los montes se vuelven carbon,” 68—78.
46. Sattar has provided the most extensive analysis of the Daquilema uprising’s ties
to the socioeconomic struggles of the mid-nineteenth century. See Sattar, “Unresolved
Inheritance," 316—57.
47. Milton Luna Tamayo, ¿Modernización? Ambigua experiencia en el Ecuador: indus
triales y fiesta popular (Quito: IADEP, 1993), 76—77.
48. See Deler, Ecuador: del espacio al estado nacional; and Guerrero, La semántica de
la dominación.
49. Prieto, Liberalismo y temor, 136.
50. Ibid., 135.
51. For more on Jaramillo and his place within the international indigenista move
ment, see José Antonio Lucero, Struggles of Voice: The Politics of Indigenous Representation
in the Andes (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2008), 70—73. See also Rebecca
Earle, The Return of the Native: Indians and Myth-Making in Spanish America, 1810-1930
(Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007), esp. chap. 7; and de la Cadena, Indigenous
Mestizos.
52. Jaramillo, El indio ecuatoriano.
53. Prieto, Liberalismo y temor, 140—41. See also Lucero, Struggles of Voice, 70—72.
54. Pineo, Social and Economic Reform, chap. 8. See also Capelo, El crimen del 15 de
noviembre de 1922.
55. Marc Becker, “Indigenous Communists and Urban Intellectuals in Cayambe,
Ecuador (1926—1944),” International Review of Social History 49, supp. (2004): 41—48.
56. Becker, Indians and Leftists, 25—32. The Socialist Party was renamed the Com
munist Party in 1931.
57. Sáenz, Sobre el indio ecuatoriano, 93—124.
58. Carlos Arroyo del Rio came close to finishing a term but was deposed in his last
months by the 1944 Glorious Revolution that was engineered by José M aría Velasco
Ibarra with support from the Federación Ecuatoriana de Indios and various center-left
groups.
59. “ Ley de Organización y Régimen de las Comunas,” in Républica del Ecuador,
26o \ Notes to Pages 194-202
Registro Oficial 2:55 (August 6,1937): 1517—19. See also Becker, “Comunas and Indigenous
Protest," 531—59; Lucero, Struggles of Voice, 70—72; and Victor A. Gonzáles S., Las tierras
comunales en el Ecuador (Guayaquil: Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana, Núcleo del Guayas,
1982), 66-70.
60. Becker, “Comunas and Indigenous Protest,” 540—46.
61. A . Kim Clark, “ Shifting Paternalism in Indian-State Relations, 1895—1950,” in
Highland Indians and the State, ed. Clark and Becker, 98—103.
62. It is unclear precisely at what point it regained its holdings on the upper reaches
of Pichincha, but, by 1928, the community once again controlled Rosaspamba and Cata-
loma, two of the disputed territories. See SNA-M TRH/Tierras, 191:5.
63. Kingman Garcés, La Ciudad y los otros, 155.
64. Carrera Andrade, El volcán y el colibrí, 21—22.
65. ANE: Parroquiales, i° Benalcázar I (November 29,1919).
66. ANE: Parroquiales, i° Benalcázar II (November 13,1922); AN E: Parroquiales, i°
Benalcázar III (November 24,1922).
67. ANE: Parroquiales, i° Benalcázar V (February 17,1926).
6 8 .Ibid.
69. ANE: Parroquiales, i° Benalcázar V (April 8, 1926); i° Benalcázar V I (May 6,
1928).
70. ANE: Parroquiales, Io Benalcázar I (January 12,1921).
71. ANE: Parroquiales, 1° Benalcázar II (March 28,1922).
72. ANE: Parroquiales, i° Benalcázar II (October 5,1922).
73. ANE: Parroquiales, i° Benalcázar IV (January 14,1925).
74. SNA-MTRH/Tierras 191:5 (May 7,1930).
75. ANE: Protocolos, Notaría i°, 549:334^ (May 28,1917); 549:404 (June 26,1917).
76. ANE: Parroquiales, i° Benalcázar IV (April 23,1925).
77. ANE: Parroquiales, 1° Benalcázar V I (April 24,1933).
78. ANE: Parroquiales, i° Benalcázar II (October 28,1922).
79. ANE: Protocolos, Notaría30, 193:761 (M arch28,1926).
80. AN E: Parroquiales, i° Benalcázar V I (November 18,1926).
81. SNA-MTRH/Tierras 191:5 (September 20,1930—October 8,1930).
82. Nicolás Tipantoctato Ministro del Interior, SNA-M TRH/Tierras 191:5 (March
25,1931).
83. Documentation of the saga summarized in the text can be found in a series of
depositions and peitions included in SNA-M TRH /Tierras 191:5 (April 26, 1928—June
25,1930) as well as in summary form in a letter José Federico Tumipamba crafted years
later, found in SNA-MTRH/Tierras 179:13.
84. The original text reads, “los sagrados derechos que nos legaron nuestros ante
pasados aborígenes en orden a la conservación de las tierras de propiedad de todos y
cada uno de los comuneros.” José Gabriel Collahuaso to Ministro de Previsión Social,
SNA-M TRH/Tierras 191:5 (April 26,1928).
85. The original text reads, “ la completa anarquía y desorden,” and “otros incautos
comuneros también seguirán camino de los desleales que han hecho las ventas." Fed
Notes to Pages 202-212 / 261
erico Tumipamba to M inistro de Previsión Social, SN A-M TRH /Tierras 191:5 (April
26,1928).
86. Pedro Camacho to M inistro de Previsión Social, SN A -M TRH /Tierras 191:5
(May 3,1928).
87. Ibid.
88. José Antonio Tum ipam ba to M inistro de Previsión Social, SN A -M T R H /
Tierras 191:5 (May 2,1930). See also SNA-M TRH/Tierras 179:13.
89. Luis Tumipamba Deposition, SNA-M TRH/Tierras 191:5 (May 30,1930).
90. Contribución sobre predios rústicos, SNA-M TRH /Tierras 191:5 (October 25,
1927).
91. Juan Alberto Tumipamba to Ministro de lo Interior, SNA-M TRH /Tierras 191:5
(January 24,1931).
92. Williams, “Popular Liberalism,” 728—29.
93. “Ley de Organización y Régimen de las Comunas,” 1518—19.
94. SNA-M TRH/Tierras 191:5.
95. SNA-M TRH/Tierras 179:13.
96. “ El IV Centenario de Atahualpa,” El comercio, August 21,1933; “Programa de la
Sociedad de Albañiles,” El comercio, August 28,1933.
97. Mercedes Prieto, “Los indios y la nación: historias y memorias en disputa,” in
Celebraciones centenarias y negociaciones por la nación ecuatorianas (Quito: FLACSO, 2010).
98. The original text reads, “su buena organización y, entre otras cosas, por ser una
de las primeras que obtuvo personería jurídica en el Ecuador, en los últimos días del
Gobierno del señor General Eloy Alfaro, precursor que fue de la moderna legislación
protectora a las comunidades campesinas.” José Gabriel Collahuaso to Ministro de Pre
visión Social, SNA-M TRH/Tierras 191:5 (July 12,1940).
99. José Domingo Laso, Quito a la vista (Quito: J. D. Laso and J. R. Cruz, 1911).
100. Hidalgo and Bedoya, “Guayaquil y Quito,” 169—79.
101. This success stands in contrast to the experiences of other subaltern popula
tions in the city’s environs. See Ernesto Capello, “City Fragments: Space and Nostalgia
in Modernizing Quito, 1885—1942” (PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin, 2005),
170—82, esp. 178—82.
102. Rappaport, Politics of Memory, 24.
P o stsc rip t
1. For a biographical sketch o f García Muñoz, see César Augusto Alarcón Costa,
Diccionario biográfico ecuatoriano (Quito: FED/Editorial Raices, 2000), 502—3.
2. Ernesto Alban Mosquera, Estampas quiteñas (Quito: Editorial “ Fray Jodoco
Ricke,” 1949). For a short history of the development of the estampa as a theatrical form,
see Descalzi, Historia critica del teatro ecuatoriano, 3:986—1017.
3. http://www.youtube.eom/user/ruthximena#play/uploads (accessed September 1,
2009).
4. Bakhtin, “Forms of Time,” 159—60. See also Bakhtin, Rabelais.
262 \ Notes to Pages 212-214
5. The original text reads, “Hubiera deseado contemplar ese Arco antiguamente,
antes del advenimiento de la luz eléctrica. Figúrome que habrá sido sitio especial para
citas amorosas, emboscadas de ‘ganster’ y puñaladas a mansalva. Ahora, la civilización,
con sus ‘osrams’ potentes, desflora la oscuridad impidiendo que en las sombras se ame,
se robe y se asesine.” Alfonso García Muñoz, Estampas de mi ciudad (Quito: Imprenta
Nacional, 1936), 125. Osram was and is an American brand of lightbulbs.
6. Adam Sharman has made this point with regard to modernismos development.
See Sharman, Tradition and Modernity in Spanish American Literature, esp. chap. 4.
7. Bakhtin, “Forms of Time,” 254. This argument has a strong association with the
Heideggerian conception of the work of art, within which the figure o f the preserver is
considered paramount to the ongoing existence of the “world” set up by the work. See
“Origin of the Work of Art,” in M artin Heidegger, Poetry, Language, Thought (New York:
Harper & Row, 1971), 66—68.
8. 1 treat this subject in Capello, “City Fragments,” chap. 8.
9. On major and minor chronotopes, see Bakhtin, “Forms of Time”; Ladin, “Flesh
ing Out the Chronotope”; and Bemong and Borghart, “Bakhtin’s Theory o f the Literary
Chronotope,” in Bakthin’s Theory, ed. Bemong et al., 7-8.
Selected Bibliography
A r c h i v a l C o ll e c t i o n s
Q u it o
263
264 \ Selected Bibliography
U n it e d S t a t e s
N e w sp a p e rs a n d M a g a z in e s
P r im a r y S o u rc e s
Alban Mosquera, Ernesto. Estampas quiteñas. Quito: Editorial “Fray Jodoco Ricke," 1949.
Alfaro, Eloy. Mensaje del Presidente de la República al Poder Legislativo sobre Exposición
Nacional. Quito: Imprenta Nacional, 1908.
Andrade, Raúl. “Retablo de una generación decapitada.” In El perfil de la quimera: siete
ensayos literarios, 65-105. Quito: Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana, 1951.
Andrade, Roberto. Pacho Villamar. 1900. Reprint, Quito: Clásicos Ariel, n.d.
----------. ¿Quién mató a García Moreno?: autobiografía de un perseguido. Quito: Abya-
Yala, 1994.
----------. ¡Sangre! ¿Quién la derramó? (historia de los últimos crímenes cometidos en la nación
del Ecuador). Quito: El Quiteño Libre, 1912.
----------. Seis de agosto o sea muerte de García Moreno. Portoviejo, Ecuador: Oficina
Tipográfica del Colegio “Olmedo,” 1896.
Andrade Coello, Alejandro. Del Quito antiguo. Quito: Imprenta “Ecuador,” 1935.
----------. Manuel J. Calle, orientaciones periodísticas. Quito: Imprenta “Ecuador,” 1919.
----------. Motivos nacionales (crónicas quiteñas). Vol. 2. Quito: Imprenta de la Escuela de
Artes y Oficios, 1927.
Barrera, Isaac. Del vivir: reflexiones de juventud. Quito: Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1972.
----------. Estudios sobre modernismo literario: publicado en el Diario El Comercio 1 Enero 1910
—10 de Abril 1910. Quito: Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana, 1971.
----------. Relación de las fiestas del primer centenario de la batalla de Pichincha, 1822-1922.
Quito: Talleres Tipográficos Nacionales, 1922.
Baudelaire, Charles. “ The Painter o f Modern Life.” In The Painter ofModern Life and
Other Essays, by Charles Baudelaire, translated and edited by Jonathan Mayne,
1—40. London: Phaidon Press, 1964.
Bemelmans, Ludwig. The Donkey Within. New York: Viking Press, 1941.
Borja, Arturo, Humberto Fierro, and Ernesto Noboa Caamaño. Otros modernistas.
Quito: Ariel, n.d.
Bustamante, José Rafael. Para matar el gusano. 1913. Reprint, Quito: Editorial Casa de la
Cultura Ecuatoriana, 1960.
Calle, Manuel J. Un forzado de las letras: antología de Manuel J. Calle. Edited by Diego
Araujo. Quito: Ediciones del Banco Central del Ecuador, 1998.
--------- . Leyendas del tiempo heroico: episodios de la guerra de la independencia. Guayaquil:
Imp. de “El Telégrafo,” 1905.
Campos, José Antonio. Cosas de mi tierra. Guayaquil: Imprenta Garay, 1929.
--------- . Linterna mágica. Guayaquil and Quito: Ariel, n.d.
Capelo, J. Alejo. El crimen del 15 de noviembre de 1922. Guayaquil: Litografía e Impr. de la
Universidad de Guayaquil; Librería y distribuidora Continental, 1983.
Carrera Andrade, Jorge. El volcán y el colibrí: autobiografía. Quito: Corporación Editora
Nacional, 1989.
266 \ Selected Bibliography
Pérez, J. Gualberto. Recuerdo histórico de la Escuela Politécnica de Quito. Quito: Tip. Prensa
Católica, 1921.
Pérez Montfort, Ricardo. Hispanismo y Falange: los sueños imperiales de la derecha española.
México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1992.
Posada, Adolfo. Escritos municipalistas y de la vida local. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios de
Administración Local, 1979.
--------- . El régimen municipal de la ciudad moderna. M adrid: Librería General de
Victoriano Suárez, 1916.
Primer Congreso de Municipalidades del Ecuador: actas, acuerdos y resoluciones. Quito:
Imprenta Municipal 1942.
República del Ecuador. Decreto Supremo de 31 de octubre de 1907 ordenando una gran
exposición nacional en Quito para el 10 de agosto de 1909. Quito: Imprenta Nacional,
1907.
--------- . Ley de régimen municipal. Guayaquil: Imprenta y talleres municipales, 1929.
La République de VÉquateur et sa participation a la Exposition Universelle de 1900. Paris:
Imprimerie du “Correo de Paris,” 1900.
Ribadeneira, J. Enrique, and Luis Cornelio Diaz V. Cien años de legislación militar, 1830—
1930. Quito: Editorial Gutenberg, 1930.
Salvador, Humberto. Ajedrez. Quito: Escuela de Artes y Oficios, 1929.
--------- . Camarada. Quito: Talleres Tipográficas Nacionales, 1933.
--------- . En la ciudad he perdido una novela. Introduction by M aría del Carmen
Fernández. 1929. Reprint, Quito: Editorial Libresa, 1996.
--------- . Esquema sexual. Quito: Imprenta Nacional, 1934.
--------- . La novela interrumpida. Quito: Editorial Quito, 1942.
--------- . Noviembre. Quito: Editorial L. I. Fernández, 1939.
--------- . Trabajadores. 1935. Reprint, Quito: Editorial El Conejo, 1985.
Schumacher, Pedro. Teocracia o demoniocracia? Cristo o Lucifer? Quién vencerá? Quién como
Dios! 2nd ed. Freiburg, Germany: B. Herder, 1897.
Sociedad Española de Amigos del Arte. Aportación al estudio de la cultura española en las
Indias: catálogo general ilustrado de la Exposición. Madrid: ESPASA-CALPE, 1930.
Suárez, Pablo Arturo. Contribución al estudio de las realidades entre las clases obreras y
campesinas. Quito: Imprenta de la Universidad Central, 1934.
Tobar Donoso, Julio. Catolicismo social. Quito: Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1936.
--------- . García Moreno y la instrucción pública. Quito: Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1940.
--------- . Las relaciones entre la iglesia y el estado ecuatoriano: resumen histórico. Quito:
Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1938.
--------- . Monografías históricas. Quito: Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1938.
Tufiño, Luis G. Servicio Geográfico del Ejercito Ecuatoriano y la única base práctica en los
estudios de la facultad de ciencias (proyecto). Quito: Imprenta y Encuadernación
Nacionales, 1911.
Vacas Galindo, Enrique. La integridad territorial del Ecuador. Quito: Tipografía y
encuadernación Salesiana, 1905.
Selected Bibliography / 269
----------. Rabelais and His World. Translated by Hélène Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana
University Press, 1984.
Balseca, Fernando. “ En busca de nuevas regions: la nación y la narrativa ecuatoriana.”
In Crítica de la literatura ecuatoriana: hacia el nuevo siglo, edited by Gabriela Pólit
Dueñas, 141—55. Quito: FLACSO, 2001.
Baskes, Jeremy. Indians, Merchants, and Markets: A Reinterpretation of the Repartimiento
and Spanish-Indian Economic Relations in Colonial Oaxaca, 1750-1821. Stanford:
Stanford University Press, 2005.
Becker, Marc. “Comunas and Indigenous Protest in Cayambe, Ecuador.” The Americas
55:4 (April 1999): 531- 59-
----------. Indians and Leftists in the Making of Ecuador’s Modern Indigenous Movements.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.
----------. “ Indigenous Communists and Urban Intellectuals in Cayambe, Ecuador
(1926—1944).” International Review of Social History 49, supp. (2004): 41—64.
Bell, Duncan S. A. “Mythscapes: Memory, Mythology, and National Identity.” British
Journal of Sociology 54:1 (March 2003): 63-81.
Belyea, Barbara. “ Images o f Power: Derrida, Foucault, Harley.” Cartographica 29:2
(summer 1992): 1—9.
Bemong, Nele, Pieter Borghart, Michel De Dobbeleer, Kristoffel Demoen, Koen De
Temmerman, and Bart Keunen, eds. Bakhtins Theory of the Literary Chronotope:
Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Ghent, Belgium: Academia Press, 2010.
Benavides Solis, Jorge. La arquitectura del siglo XX en Quito. Quito: Banco Central del
Ecuador, 1995.
Black, Chad. “Between Prescription and Practice: Governance, Legal Culture, and
Gender in Quito, 1765—1830.” PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico, 2006.
Borges Lemos, Celina. “The Modernization of Brazilian Urban Space as a Political
Symbol of the Republic.” Translated by Elizabeth A . Jackson. Journal of Decorative
and Propaganda Arts 21 (1995): 219-37.
Boyer, M. Christine. The City of Collective Memory: Its Historical Imagery and Architectural
Entertainments. Cambridge, M A: M IT Press, 1994.
Boym, Svetlana. The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books, 2001.
Brading, D. A. The First America: The Spanish Monarchy, Creole Patriots, and the Liberal
State, 1492-1867. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Bustos, Guillermo. “La hispanización de la memoria pública en el cuarto centenario de
fundación de Quito.” In Etnicidad y poder en los países andinos, edited by Christian
Büschges, Guillermo Bustos, and Olaf Kaltmeier, 111—34. Quito: Corporación
Editora Nacional, 2007.
--------- . “Quito en la transición: Actores colectivos e identidades culturales urbanas
(1920—1950).” In Enfoques y estudios históricos: Quito a través de la historia, 163—88.
Quito: Editorial Fraga, 1992.
Caicedo, Gabriela. “ Entre la plaza San Francisco de Quito y la Piazza San Marco de
Venecia.” TRA M A 80 (2002): 36-39.
Selected Bibliography / 271
Canessa Oneto, Mario. 100 años de historia del tenis ecuatoriano. Guayaquil: Poligràfica
C.A ., 2000.
Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge. Puritan Conquistadors: Iberianizing the Atlantic, 1550—1700.
Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.
Capello, Ernesto. “Arquivo: Jacinto Jijón y Caamaño, 'La fecha de fundación de Quito.’”
Brújula 5:1 (December 2006): 37—43.
----------. “ The City as Anachronism: Remembering Quito in the Liberal Era.” M A
thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
----------. “City, Chronicle, Chronotope: Re-Constructing and Writing Old Quito.”
Journal of Latin American Urban Studies 6 (fall 2004): 37—56.
--------- . “City Fragments: Space and Nostalgia in Modernizing Quito, 1885—1942." PhD
dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 2005.
----------. “ Hispanismo casero: la invención del Quito hispano.” ProcesoS: revísta
ecuatoriana de historia 20 (fall 2003—spring 2004): 55—77.
----------. “ Imaging Old Quito: The Postcolonial City as Universal Nostalgia.” City:
Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 10:2 (July 2006): 125—47.
Carpio Vintim illa, Julio. La evolución urbana de Cuenca en el siglo XIX. Cuenca:
Universidad de Cuenca (IDIS), 1983.
Carrión, Fernando. Quito: crisis y política urbana. Quito: CIUDAD; Editorial El Conejo,
1987.
Castells, Manuel. City, Class, and Power. Translated by E. Lebas. New York: St. Martin’s
Press, 1978.
----------. The City and the Grassroots. Berkeley: University of California, 1983.
Casti, Emanuela. Reality as Representation: The Semiotics of Cartography. Bergamo, Italy:
Bergamo University Press—Sestante, 2000.
Castillo Illingworth, Santiago. La iglesia y la revolución liberal: las relaciones de la iglesia y
el estado en la época del liberalismo. Quito: Ediciones del Banco Central del Ecuador,
1995-
Qelík, Zeynep. Displaying the Orient: Architecture of Islam at Nineteenth-Century World’s
Fairs. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
Cevallos Garcia, Gabriel. La historia en el Ecuador. In Reflexiones sobre la historia del
Ecuador, primera parte, 55—217. Quito: Ediciones del Banco Central del Ecuador, 1987.
Cevallos Romero, Alfonso. Arte, diseño y arquitectura en el Ecuador: la obra del Padre
Brüning, 1899—1938. Quito: Museos del Banco Central del Ecuador/Abya-Yala, 1994.
----------, and Pedro M. Durini R. Ecuador universal: visión desconocida de una etapa de la
arquitectura ecuatoriana. Quito: P. M. Durini R., 1990.
Chalupa, Federico A. “ The Ecuadorian City and Modernity: Jorge Icaza’s Quito." In
The Image of the City in Literature, Media, and Society, edited by Will Wright and
Steven Kaplan, 149—53. Pueblo: Colorado State University-Pueblo, 2003.
Clark, A. Kim. “ Indians, the State and Law: Public Works and the Struggle to Control
Labor in Liberal Ecuador.” Journal of Historical Sociology 7:1 (March 1994): 49—72.
--------- . “La medida de la diferencia: las imágenes indigenistas de los indios serranos en
272 \ Selected Bibliography
Deler, Jean Paul. Ecuador: del espacio al estado nacional. Quito: Banco Central del
Ecuador, 1987.
----------, Nelson Gómez, and Michel Portáis. El manejo del espacio en el Ecuador: etapas
claves. Quito: Centro Ecuatoriano de Investigación Geográfica, 1983.
Demalas, Marie-Danielle, and Yves Saint-Geours. Jerusalén y Babilonia: religión y política
en el Ecuador, 1780—1880. Translated by Carmen Garatea Yuri. Quito: Corporación
Editora Nacional, 1988.
Descalzi, Ricardo. Historia crítica del teatro ecuatoriano. 6 vols. Quito: Editorial Casa de
la Cultura Ecuatoriana, 1968.
Domingo D., Walter. “Entrevista a Guillermo Jones Odriozola sobre el Plan Regulador
de Quito de 1942—1944.'' TR A MA 56 (January 1992): 34—41.
Drake, Paul W. The Money Doctor in the Andes: The Kemmerer Missions, 1923—1933.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1989.
Dym, Jordana, and Karl Offen, eds. Mapping Latin America: A Cartographic Reader.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
Earle, Rebecca. The Return of the Native: Indians and Myth-Making in Spanish America,
1810—1930. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.
Espinosa Apolo, Manuel. Mestizaje, cholificación y blanqueamiento en Quito primera
mitad del siglo XX. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar Ecuador; Abya-Yala;
Corporación Editora Nacional, 2003.
Etlin, Richard A. Modernism in Italian Architecture, 1890—1940. Cambridge, M A : M IT
Press, 1991.
Fabian, Johannes. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York:
Columbia University Press, 1983.
Fernández Borchart, Ricardo. Waldo Frank: un puente entre las dos Americas. Coruña,
Spain: Universidade da Coruña, 1997.
Fernández, María del Carmen. El realismo abierto de Pablo Palacio en la encrucijada de los
30. Quito: Ediciones Libri Mundi/Enrique Grosse-Luemern, 1991.
----------. “Estudio Introductorio.” In En la ciudad he perdido una novela, by Humberto
Salvador. Quito: Editorial Libresa, 1996.
Fernández-Salvador, Carmen. “ Images and Memory: The Construction of Collective
Identities in Seventeenth-Century Quito.” PhD dissertation, University of Chicago,
2005.
----------, and Alfredo Costales. Arte colonial quiteño: renovado enfoque y nuevos actores.
Quito: FONSAL, 2007.
Fischel, Astrid. El Teatro Nacional de Costa Rica: su historia. San José, Costa Rica:
Editorial Teatro Nacional, 1992.
Fojas, Camilla. Cosmopolitanism in the Americas. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University
Press, 2005.
Foster, David William, and Daniel Altamiranda, eds. Theoretical Debates in Spanish
American Literature. New York: Garland Publishing, 1997.
Fradera, Josep Maria. Cultura nacional en una societat dividida: patriotisme i cultura a
Catalunya (1838—1868). Barcelona: Curial, 1992.
274 \ Selected Bibliography
Galvez, Manuel. Vida de don Gabriel Garcia Moreno. Buenos Aires: Editorial Difusión,
1942.
Gauderman, Kim. Women's Lives in Colonial Quito: Gender, Law, and Economy in Spanish
America. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2003.
Goetschel, Ana M aría. Educación de las mujeres, maestras y esferas públicas: Quito en la
primera mitad del siglo XX. Quito: FLACSO Sede Ecuador—Abya-Yala, 2007.
----------. “ Hegemonía y sociedad (Quito: 1930—1950).” In Ciudades de los Andes: visión
histórica y contemporánea, ed. Eduardo Kingman Garcés, 319—47. Quito: CIUDAD,
1992.
----------, ed. Orígenes del feminismo en el Ecuador: antología. Quito: CONAMU; FLACSO;
Municipio del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito; UNIFEM , 2006.
Gómez, Nelson. La misión geodésica y la cultura de Quito. Quito: Edíguias, 1987.
----------. Quito y su desarrollo urbano. Quito: Editorial Camino, 1980.
Gómez R., Jorge. Las misiones pedagógicas alemanas y la educación en el Ecuador. Quito:
Abya-Yala 1993.
González de Valcárcel, J. M. Restauración monumental y “puesta en valor" de las ciudades
americanas (Architectural Conservation and Enhancement of Historic Towns in
America). Barcelona: Editorial Blume, 1977.
Gootenberg, Paul. Imagining Development: Economic Ideas in Peru's “Fictitious Prosperity" of
Guano, 1840-1880. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
Gorelik, Adrián. La grilla y el parque: espacio público y cultura urbana en Buenos Aires,
1887—1936. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 1998.
----------, and Graciela Silvestri. “ The Past as the Future: A Reactive Utopía in Buenos
Aires.” In The Latin American Cultural Studies Reader, edited by Ana Del Sarto,
Alicia Ríos, and Abril Trigo, 427—40. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.
Granados García, Aimer, and Carlos Marichal, eds. Construcción de las identidades
latinoamericanas: ensayos de historia intelectual (siglos X IX y XX). Mexico City: El
Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Históricos, 2004.
Greet, Michele. Beyond National Identity: Pictorial Indigenism as a Modernist Strategy in
Andean Art, 1920—1960. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009.
Gruzinski, Serge. Images at War: Mexico from Columbus to Blade Runner (1492—2019).
Translated by Heather MacLean. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001.
Guerra, Franijois-Xavier. Modernidades e independencias: ensayos sobre las revoluciones
hispánicas. Madrid: Editorial M APFRE, 1992.
Guerrero, Andrés. “ The Construction of a Ventriloquist’s Image: Liberal Discourse
and the ‘Miserable Indian Race’ in Late 19th-Century Ecuador.” Journal of Latin
American Studies 29:3 (October 1997): 555-90.
----------. “Curagas y tenientes politicos: la ley de la costumbre y la ley del estado (Otavalo
1830-1875)." Estudios y debates 2 (December 1989): 321—66.
----------. Los oligarcas del cacao: ensayo sobre la acumulación originaria en el Ecuador:
hacendados, cacaoteros, banqueros exportadores y comerciantes en Guayaquil (1890—1910).
Quito: El Conejo, 1980.
Selected Bibliography / 275
M ignolo, Walter. The Darker Side of the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality, and
Colonization. 2nd ed. A nn Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003.
M ills, Kenneth R. Idolatry and Its Enemies: Colonial Andean Religion and Extirpation,
1640-1730. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
Mills, Kenneth, and W illiam B. Taylor, eds. Colonial Spanish America: A Documentary
History. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1998.
Minchom, M artin. The People of Quito, 1690—1810: Change and Unrest in the Underclass.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994.
Mino, Reinaldo. Eugenio Espejo y la defensa de los indios. Quito: Sistema Nacional de
Bibliotecas, 1995.
----------. Visión actual de Eugenio Espejo. Quito: Fundación Eugenio Espejo/Fundación
Friedrich Naumann, 1988.
Miranda Ribadeneira, Francisco. La primera escuela politécnica del Ecuador: estudio
histórico e interpretación. Quito: Ediciones Feso, 1972.
Morales Moreno, Elsa Susana, Alicia Verónica Oña Velasco, and M aría Verónica Padrón
Cosíos. “Análisis histórico de la obra arquitectónica del Arq. Francisco Durini
Cáceres en la ciudad de Quito.” BFA thesis, Universidad Central del Ecuador, 2001.
Morelli, Federica. “Las reformas en Quito: la redistribución del poder y la consolidación
de la jurisdicción municipal (1765—18 09)." Jahrbuchfür Ceschichte von Staat, Wirtschaft
und Cessellschaft Lateinamerikas, no. 34 (1997): 183—207.
--------- . Territorio o nazione: riforma e dissoluzione dello spazio imperiale in Ecuador, 1763—
1830. Soveria Mannelli, Italy: Rubbetino Editore, 2001.
----------. “Un neo-sincretismo político: representación política y sociedad indígena
durante el primer liberalismo hispanoamericano; el caso de la Audiencia de Quito
(1813—1850).” In Muchas Hispanoaméricas: antropología, historia y enfogues culturales
en los estudios latinoamericanistas, edited by T. Krüggeler and U. Mücke, 151—65.
Madrid: Iberoamericana, 2001.
Moreno Yañez, Segundo E. Alexander von Humboldt: diarios de viaje en la Audiencia de
Quito. Translated by Christiana Borchat de Moreno. Quito: Occidental Exploration
and Production, 2005.
----------. Sublevaciones indígenas en la Audiencia de Quito: desde comienzos del siglo XV III
hasta finales de la colonia. 4th ed. Quito: Ediciones de la Pontificia Universidad
Católica del Ecuador, 1995.
Morse, Richard M. New World Soundings: Culture and Ideology in the Americas. Baltimore:
Johns Flopkins University Press, 1989.
----------. “The Urban Development of Colonial Spanish America.” In The Cambridge
History of Latin America. Vol. 2, Colonial Latin America, edited by Leslie Bethell,
67—104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
----------, and Jorge E. Flardoy, eds. Rethinking the Latin American City. Washington, DC:
Woodrow Wilson Center Press; Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.
Mundy, Barbara E. The Mapping of New Spain: Indigenous Cartography and the Maps of the
Relaciones Geográficas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
278 \ Selected Bibliography
Piccato, Pablo. City of Suspects: Crime in Mexico City, 1900-1931. Durham, NC: Duke
University Press, 2001.
Pickles, John. A History of Spaces: Cartographic Reason, Mapping, and the Geo-Coded World.
London: Routledge, 2004.
Pike, Frederick. Hispanismo, 1898-1936: Spanish Conservatives and Liberals and Their
Relations with Spanish America. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press,
1971.
Píneo, Ronn F. Social and Economic Reform in Ecuador: Life and Work in Guayaquil.
Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1996.
Pólit Dueñas, Gabriela, ed. Crítica literaria ecuatoriana: antología. Quito: FLACSO, 2001.
Ponce Leiva, Pilar. Certeza ante la incertidumbre: élite y cabildo de Quito en el siglo XVII.
Quito: Abya-Yala, 1998.
Poole, Deborah. Vision, Race, and Modernity: A Visual Economy of the Andean Image World.
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
Porras, María Elena, and Pedro Calvo-Sotelo, eds. Ecuador-España: historia y perspectiva.
Quito: Embajada de España, 2001.
Powers, Karen Viera. Andean Journeys: Migration, Ethnogenesis, and State in Colonial
Quito. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1995.
--------- . “A Battle of Wills: Inventing Chiefly Legitimacy in the Colonial North Andes.”
In Dead Giveaways: Indigenous Testaments of Colonial Mesoamerica and the Andes,
edited by Susan Kellogg and Matthew Restall, 183—213. Salt Lake City: University
o f Utah Press, 1998.
----------. “Land Concentration and Environmental Degradation: Town Council Records
on Deforestation in Uyumbicho (Quito, 1553—96).” In Colonial Lives: Documents on
Latin American History, 1550—1850, edited by Richard Boyer and Geoffrey Spurling,
11—17. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Pratt, M ary Louise. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. 2nd ed. New
York: Routledge, 2008.
Prieto, Mercedes. Liberalismo y temor: imaginando los sujetos indígenas en el Ecuador
postcolonial, 1895—1950. Quito: FLACSO, 2004.
----------. “Los indios y la nación: historias y memorias en disputa.” In Celebraciones
centenarias y negociaciones por la nación ecuatorianas, edited by Mercedes Prieto and
Valeria Coronel. Quito: FLACSO, 2010.
Quantrill, Malcolm, ed. Latin American Architecture: Six Voices. College Station: Texas
A & M University Press, 2000.
Quintero, Rafael, and Erika Silva. “ La crisis nacional general de 1895.” Cultura 4:11
(September—December 1981): 93—107.
----------. Ecuador: una nación en ciernes. 3rd ed. Quito: Abya-Yala, 1998.
Quito: una visión histórica de su arquitectura. Quito: T R A M A , 1993.
Rama, Angel. La ciudad letrada. Hanover, NH: Ediciones del Norte, 1984.
Ramos, Julio. Desencuentros de la modernidad en América Latina: literatura y política en el
siglo XIX. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1989.
28o \ Selected Bibliography
Rappaport, Joanne. The Politics of Memory: Native Historical Interpretation in the Colombian
Andes. 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Dulce University Press, 1998.
Reimers, Luis Andrade. Olmedo: el estadista. Quito: Editorial Ediguias, 1993.
Ribadeneira, J. Enrique, and Luis Cornelio Diaz V. Cien años de legislación militar, 1830—
1930. Quito: Editorial Gutenberg, 1930.
Ristow, Walter William. American Maps and M apmakers: Commercial Cartography in the
Nineteenth Century. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1985.
Robles, Humberto E. La noción de vanguardia en el Ecuador: recepción - trayectoria —
documentos. 1918—1934. Guayaquil: Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana “ Benjamín
Carrión,” Núcleo del Guayas, 1989.
Rodríguez, Linda Alexander. The Search for Public Policy: Regional Politics and Government
Finances in Ecuador, 1830—1940. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.
Rodriguez Bernal, Eduardo. Historia de la Exposición Ibero-Americana de Sevilla de 1929.
Seville: Ayuntamiento de Sevilla, 1994.
Rodríguez O., Jaime E. The Emergence of Spanish America: Vicente Rocafuerte and Spanish
Americanism, 1808—1832. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.
--------- . The Independence of Spanish America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1998.
Roig, Arturo Andres. Pensamiento social de Juan Montalvo: sus lecciones al pueblo. Quito:
Editorial Tercer Mundo, 1984.
Romera Navarro, M. El hispanismo en Norte-América: exposición y crítica de su aspecto
literario. Madrid: Renacimiento, 1917.
Roniger, Luis, and Carlos H. Waisman, eds. Globality and Multiple Modernities:
Comparative North American and Latin American Perspectives. Brighton, UK: Sussex
Academic Press, 2002.
Safier, Neil. Measuring the New World: Enlightenment Science and South America. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 2008.
Salvatore, Ricardo D., and Carlos Aguirre, eds. The Birth of the Penitentiary in Latin
America: Essays on Criminology, Prison Reform, and Social Control, 1830—1940. Austin:
University of Texas Press, 1996.
Sarlo, Beatriz. Una modernidad periférica: Buenos Aires, 1920 y 1930. Buenos Aires:
Ediciones Nueva Vision, 1988.
Sattar, Aleezé. “An Unresolved Inheritance: Postcolonial State Formation and
Indigenous Communities in Chimborazo, Ecuador, 1820—1875.” PhD dissertation,
New School University, 2001.
Schivelbusch, Wolfgang. Disenchanted Night: The Industrialization of Light in the
Nineteenth Century. Translated by Angela Davies. Berkeley: University o f California
Press, 1988.
Schmidt-Nowara, Christopher. The Conquest of History: Spanish Colonialism and National
Histories in the Nineteenth Century. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2006.
Seed, Patricia. Ceremonies of Possession in Europe’s Conquest of the New World, 1492—1640.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Selected Bibliography / 281
Vela Witt, María Susana. El Departamento del Suren la Gran Colombia, 1822-1830. Quito:
Abya-Yala, 1999.
Vera H., Humberto. Equator: History and Geography of the Equatorial Monument.
Translated by Adriana Vera S. Quito: Ediciones Ecuador, 1990.
Villacres Moscoso, Jorge W. Historia diplomática de la República del Ecuador. Vol. 2.
Guayaquil: Imprenta de la Universidad de Guayaquil, 1971.
Walls, Laura Dassow. The Passage to Cosmos: Alexander von Humboldt and the Shaping of
America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
Webster, Susan V. Arquitectura y empresa en el Quito colonial: José Jaime Ortiz, Alarife
Mayor. Quito: Abya-Yala, 2002.
----------. “ The Devil and the Dolorosa: History and Legend in Quito’s Capilla de
Cantuña.” The Americas 67:1 (July 2010): 1-30 .
W illiam s, Derek. “ Negotiating the State: National Utopias and Local Politics in
Ecuador, 1845—75.” PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook,
2001.
----------. “ Popular Liberalism and Indian Servitude: The Making and Unmaking of
Ecuador’s Antilandlord State, 1845—1868.” Hispanic American Historical Review 83:4
(November 2003): 697-733.
Wood, Denis, with John Fels. The Power of Maps. New York: Guilford Press, 1992.
Woodward, David, Catherine Delano-Smith, and Cordell D. K. Yee, eds. Approaches and
Challenges in a Worldwide History of Cartography. Barcelona: Instituí Cartográfic de
Catalunya, 2000.
Ycaza, Patricio. Historia del movimiento obrero ecuatoriano: de su génesis al Frente Popular.
Quito: CEDIM E, 1984.
----------. Movimiento estudiantil: ¿para dónde camina? Quito: Centro de Educación
Popular, 1989.
Zamora Vicente, Alonso. La Real Academia Española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, S. A., 1999.
Index
283
284 \ Index
C iu d a d e la M a r is c a l S u c r e , 4 8 , 1 4 1 , 1 4 5 , 1 8 1 , 1 9 7 C o rd ero , L u is, 1 6 ,1 2 1
C iu d a d e la P ic h in c h a , 2 0 4 —5 C o r r a l y C h a n c le ta , E v a risto . See G a rc ía M u ñ o z ,
civitas, 25, 27, 46 , 48 A lfo n so
C la rk , A . K im , x v ii, 18 , 9 5 , 1 5 1 ,1 9 4 —95 corregim iento, 8 8 ,18 2 —86, 22 2n i5
coastal region, xv, 1 1 —15, 29. 34- 9 8 .13 5.153 ; corridas. See b u llfig h ts
eco n om y o f, 1 1 , 1 8 , 1 0 4 , 1 9 1 , 2 2 4 ^ 2 ; lite ra ry C o rte s de C á d iz , 1 1 , 6 3 ,18 5
re p resen ta tio n , 1 8 , 1 5 1 ,1 5 6 ,1 6 7 , 1 7 2 , 2 5 o n 29 ; c o s m o p o lita n is m , 16 ,14 8 , 215—16 ; c a rto g ra p h y a n d ,
r iv a lr y w ith A n d e a n re g io n , x v ii, 1 , 1 2 , 1 8 . See also 26, 38, 40 , 45, 58; D u rin i fa m ily a n d , 11 7 —1 8 , 1 2 1 ,
L ib e ra l P a rty ; h ig h la n d s 12 9 —3 0 , 1 3 6 , 1 4 1 , 1 4 6 , 216 ; d y s to p ia n ism a n d , 156,
cob b leston e, 78, 9 2, 97—9 9 ,1 5 5 ,16 5 , 24 o n 4 8 . See also 16 0 , 215; lib e ra lis m a n d 14 , 77; u rb a n p la n n in g
p av in g a n d , 16
C o le g io d e S a n G a b rie l, Q u ito , 1 3 ,1 8 , 3 4 , 7 1 ,1 5 3 C o s ta R ic a , 1 1 8 , 1 2 1 —2 4 ,1 2 6 ,1 3 0 ,1 3 5 . See also D u r in i
C o lla h u a so , Jo sé G a b rie l, 18 0 , 2 16 ; A ta h u a lp a fa m ily ; D u rin i C á c e re s, F ra n c isco M a n u e l;
m o n u m en t a n d , 2 0 5 —6; m a n ip u la tio n o f h isto ry , D u rin i C á c e re s, P ed ro ; D u rin i V a s a lli, L o re n z o ;
20 3 , 20 6 ; n e p o tism a n d , 2 0 2 - 3 ; S a n ta C la ra D u rin i V a ss a li, F ra n c isco ; P la za G u tie r re z ,
c a b ild o p re sid e n t, 2 0 0 - 2 0 3 ; T u m ip a m b a fa m ily Le o n id a s
a n d , 18 0 , 2 0 0 - 2 0 3 . See also S a n ta C la r a d e S a n costumbrismo, 15—16
M illá n ; T u m ip a m b a , Jo sé F e d e ric o C o to c o lla o , 4 5 ,19 6
C o lo m a S ilv a , A lb e rto , 15 6 ,1 5 9 ,1 6 3 , 2 14 C o to p a x i, 19 0 ,1 9 3 —94
C o lo m b ia , 7, 45, 5 4 ,1 0 0 , 2 0 7 —8; c o n se rv a tiv e c o u n te r-c a rto g ra p h y , 1 4 8 ,1 5 1 ,1 6 3 , 1 7 7 , 216
in v a sio n in 19 0 0 ,1 7 , 7 0 ; e co n o m y o f, 18 ,1 0 4 ; C ra ib , R a y m o n d , 25
E c u a d o ria n e x ile in , 14 , 2 1, 7 2 , 1 5 1 ; G ra n C re o le s, 7, 27, 6 3 ,15 3 ,18 4
C o lo m b ia , 1 1 , 3 2 - 3 3 , 6 3 ,1 2 0 ; in d ig en o u s C re sp o T o ra l, R e m ig io , 80
p o p u la tio n s , 186 ; S p a in re la tio n s w ith , 64. See C rio llo , E lisa , 197
also B o g o tá ; B o lív a r, S im ó n ; Pop ayán cronistas, 2 2 ,1 4 7 ,1 5 6 - 5 7 ,1 5 9 ,1 6 3 , 2 11
C o m ité F ra n c e -A m e r iq u e, 55, 73 C ro w n . See S p a in : m o n arch y
C o m ité F ra n c o -E c u a to r ia n o , 142 C u a d r a , Jo sé d e la , 167
c o m m u n a l la n d s , x ix ; c o n flic ts re g a rd in g , 18 8 —90, C u e n c a , 9 —1 0 ,1 4 7 ; C a th o lic C h u rc h a n d , 68; c o lo n ia l
19 2 ; in d ig en o u s c o n tro l o f, 1 7 9 , 1 9 2 , 1 9 5 , 2 0 0 - a d m in istra tio n , 10 ; eco n o m y o f, 9 ,1 5 , 1 8 ; G ra n
2 0 2 , 2 0 5, 20 7, 215; state a n d , 18 6 —8 7 ,1 9 1 ,1 9 3 —94, C o lo m b ia a n d , 32 ; in te lle c tu a l a c tiv ity , 16 ,1 5 7 ;
20 8; u rb a n e n cro a c h m e n t o n , 18 0 lib e ra l re vo lu tio n a n d , 17 ; n a tio n a l p o litic s a n d ,
c o m m u n icen tric m a p p in g , 6, 25, 40 4 8 , 58 1 1 —1 2 ,1 8 , 6 9 ,15 3 ,19 2 , 2 2 n i8 ; tra v e le r’s a c c o u n ts,
c o m m u n ism ,18 1 ,1 9 3 . See also s o c ia lism ; S o c ia lis t 54
P a rty o f E c u a d o r
C o m te , A u g u s te . See p o s itiv ism D a d a , 15 6 ,1 5 9 ,1 7 7 , 2 1 3 , 2 5 1 ^ 2
comuneros, 17 9 ,18 6 —8 7 ,1 9 1—9 2 , 1 9 9 - 2 0 2 , 2 0 7 —8, D a q u ile m a , F e rn a n d o , 19 0 , 259n 46 . See also
2 6 o n n 8 4 —85. See also L e y d e C o m u n a s (1937) Y a ru q u ie s
C o n ce jo M u n ic ip a l. See M u n ic ip a l C o u n c il D a río , R u b é n , 65—6 6 ,1 5 3 —54
concertaje, 1 2 ,1 9 1 ; e ra d ic a tio n o f, 2 0 ,1 9 1 ; lib e ra l D ’A ro n c o , R a im o n d o , 137. See also D u rin i C á c e re s,
op p o sitio n to, 1 5 ,1 7 , 1 5 1 F ra n c isco M a n u e l
C o n c h am b a y , N ico lá s, 196 d a y t r ip s , 26 , 4 5 ,5 3 - 5 4
C o n g re ss o f E c u a d o r, 1 6 ,1 7 ,1 0 7 ; b u d g e ts a n d , D el M a z o , D o m in g o , 1 8 7 - 8 9 ,2 0 2 , 20 8.
15; c o m m u n a l la n d h o ld in g a n d , 1 8 0 ,19 1 ; D el M a z o , Ju a n a , 18 8 - 8 9 , 208
In d ep en d en ce M o n u m e n t a n d , 1 2 1 , 1 2 7 —28; D elg a d o , Ju lio E sa u , 38
L ib e ra l p o litic s a n d , 12 4 ; m u n ic ip a l p o litic s D elg a d o , R a m ó n , 18 8 - 8 9
a n d , 87, 9 0 —93; 9 8 , 1 0 1 , 1 0 3 , 1 0 8 —9, N a tio n a l d e v il. See S a ta n
A c a d e m y o f H is to ry a n d , 71 D ia d e la R a z a . See la raza
C o n q u e st, th e, x ix , 6, 6 2—63, 69, 7 2 ,18 7 d iv in e P ro vid e n c e, 28, 62, 65, 68
C o n q u ista d o rs, x v ii, 6, 67, 75, 8 0 —8 1, 87 D o m in ic a n order, 8, 4 0 , 6 3, 75; p a s tu re s , 4 1 , 1 0 0 ;
C o n se rv a tiv e P a rty , 1 6 , 1 8 , 1 0 0 ; h ig h la n d p o litic a l sex s c a n d a l, 16 , 69. See also S a n to D o m in g o
d o m in a n c e , 1 1 —12 , 88, 95; H is p a n is m o f , 62, m o n a ste ry ; V a ca s G a lin d o , E n riq u e
7 1—7 2, 82, 215; in te lle c tu a l v ie w s o f, 15 , 67, 80, D u ra n ti, R e g in a ld o , 6 9 —70
14 4 ; la b o r p o litic s o f, 2 0 ,7 1 ; L ib e ra l R e v o lu tio n D u rin i fa m ily , x ix , 1 1 4 , 1 2 1 ; b u sin e ss p ra ctic e s, x ix ,
a n d , 1 6 - 1 7 , 6 9 - 7 0 , 96, 9 8 ,1 4 7 - 4 8 ,1 5 1 —53; 117 —18 ; D u rin i H e rm a n o s, 12 2 —2 4 ,1 2 8 ; L . D u rin i
m u n ic ip a l p o litic s o f, 84, 86—87, 9 0 . 1 1 1 —13 , 8c H ijo s, 12 8 —3 0 ,13 4
20 5, 215; Q u ito a n d , 18, 85; re g en e ra tio n o f, 10 3 , D u r in i, G io v a n n i (Ju an ), 122
1 0 5 - 7 , 1 1 1 ; s o c ia l vie w s o f, 6 9 ,1 4 8 ,1 9 2 , 2 0 6 . See D u r in i C á c e re s, F ra n c isco M a n u e l, 4 2 , 1 1 7 —1 8 ,1 3 4 ;
also C a th o lic C h u rc h ; G a rc ia M o re n o , G a b rie l; A ra b e sq u e sty le , 1 4 1 , 1 4 4 ; B an co d e l P ic h in c h a ,
G o n z á le z S u á r e z , F e d e ric o ; Jijó n y C a a m a ñ o , 8 1 , 1 3 6 ,1 3 9 —4 1 , 1 4 3 —4 4 ; C a s a M u n ic ip a l, 13 4 —35;
Ja cin to C írc u lo M ilita r , 1 3 8 - 4 0 ; c o lu m n to u n k n o w n
C o n s titu tio n o f 18 12 . See C o rte s d e C á d iz h eroes o f 1 8 2 2 ,1 0 2 ; D A r o n c o a n d , 1 4 0 ,1 4 3 ;
contribución personal. See trib u te h y b rid ity , 12 9 ,13 5 —3 6 ,1 4 4 , 215—16 ; h y p h e n a te d
contribución su bsidiaria . See trib u te v e rn a c u la r, 11 7 —1 8 , 1 2 1 , 1 3 0 , 1 4 1 —4 2 , 1 4 4 —4 5 , 2i6 ;
286 \ Index
In the seventeenth cen tury, local Jesuits and Franciscans imagined Quito as the
“new Rome.” It was the o rig in o f crusades into th e w ilderness and the p u rveyo r o f
civilization to the entire region. By the early tw entieth century, elites envisioned
the city as the heart o f a m odern, advanced society— poised at the physical and
metaphysical centers o f th e world.
In this original cu ltu ra l history, Ernesto C ap ello analyzes the form ation o f
mem ory, myth, and m od ern ity through the eyes o f Q uito’s diverse populations.
By employing M ikhail B ak h tin ’s concept o f chronotopes, Capello views the con fig
uration o f time and space in narratives that d efined Q uito’s identity and its place
in the world. He explores the proliferation o f these im aginings in architecture,
museum s, monuments, to u rism , art, urban p la n n in g, literature, religion, in d ig
enous rights, and politics. To Capello, these tropes began to crystallize at th e end
o f the nineteenth century, serving as a tool fo r d istin ct groups who laid c la im to
history for economic or p olitical gain during th e upheavals o f m odernism . In the
process o f both destroying and renewing elements o f the past, modern Q uito thus
emerged at the crux o f H ispanism and Liberalism , as an independent global soci
ety struggling to keep th e m em ory of its colonial and indigenous roots alive.
P IT T LA T IN A M E R IC A N SERIES
University of Pittsburgh Press
www.upress.pitt.edu
ISBN 13:978-0-8229-6166-6
C over art: From Jo rge Juan and A n to n io d e Ulloa ISBN 10:0-8229-6166-0
Plano de la äudad de San Francisco de Quito (1748).
C ou rtesy Library of Congress.