Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scorecard and Assessment Report For Startups: Concept
Scorecard and Assessment Report For Startups: Concept
Scorecard and Assessment Report For Startups: Concept
Code 963
POC/Beta / Pilot/
Current status Yet to Start Growth
Early Growth
May be of interest to
Is this venture in an area of interest to investors? No Yes
some investors
Note: This is an interim report, based on inferences from the material received and the website/app (if relevant). The scorecard and assessment
report may change based on more detailed interactions.
Concept 0 out of 36
Market opportunity: Does the concept/solution No or need already Perhaps a latent need,
address a real, felt need or an obvious need gap that is being well serviced by but may not be an YES
currently un-addressed? others expressed need
May be (e.g.
processes, scale,
Is the differentiator / uniqueness defensible? No brand… things that Yes (e.g. IP)
can give a competitive
distinctiveness)
Product 2 out of 19
Technology Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
UX (Online as well as offline, if relevant) Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Business case / Unit Economics Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
When can the business be profitable? Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Can this be a meaningful business? Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Potential - Size of the market opportunity USD 1bn - USD 5bn > USD 5 bn
Traction Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Customers / users satisfaction Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Customer coversion metrics Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Has the product-market fit been established? Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Is the progress impressive? Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Team 40 out of 66
Number of founders Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Are all founders full-time on this venture? Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
How strong is the team on marketing & sales? Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Is the equity fairly distributed among founders? Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Is this a strong team? Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Does the team have a strong implementation plan? Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Valuation sought by the team Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Is the quantum of capital sought adequate and practical? Not indicated / Cannot infer from information provided in pitch deck
Note: Scores on 'Not indicated' columns are taken at '2' (Or '5' in case of Percentage and
important parameters). However, they may be revised upwards of lower based chances of getting 22%
on further information. investor interest
Note: The scorecard is prepared by the Q-Rate review team. It is subjective. Different people will have different perspectives on a business. The
intention is to provide entrepreneurs one experienced perspective on how investors are likely to view their venture.
Above 85% - Strong chances Between 70 - 85% - Modest Between 50 and 70% - Will Below 50% - unlikely to get
of getting investor interest chances of getting investor need significant changes in investor interest
interest - can be improved strategy to attract investor
interest