This document provides an evaluation rubric for e-portfolios. It evaluates e-portfolios on grammar and spelling, quality of writing content, standards of writing formats, and portfolio submission and timing. For each category, it provides criteria for scores ranging from 1-3 (lower than average), 4-7 (adequate/average), and 8-10 (above average/excellent).
This document provides an evaluation rubric for e-portfolios. It evaluates e-portfolios on grammar and spelling, quality of writing content, standards of writing formats, and portfolio submission and timing. For each category, it provides criteria for scores ranging from 1-3 (lower than average), 4-7 (adequate/average), and 8-10 (above average/excellent).
This document provides an evaluation rubric for e-portfolios. It evaluates e-portfolios on grammar and spelling, quality of writing content, standards of writing formats, and portfolio submission and timing. For each category, it provides criteria for scores ranging from 1-3 (lower than average), 4-7 (adequate/average), and 8-10 (above average/excellent).
Lower than Average (1-3) Adequate – Average Above Average – Excellent (4-7) (8-10) Grammar and There is minimal evidence There is some evidence of There is evidence of spelling showing that proofreading being proofreading successfully proofreading was attempted. However, completed. Overall, there attempted. there were ample are rare mistakes Score: /10 mistakes that deterred throughout the e-Portfolio. ease of reading. Quality of Many, if not, all written Some entries in the e- All, if not, most entries in writing content entries in the e-Portfolio Portfolio show very little the e-Portfolio show great show very little concern concern over the quality consideration over the over the quality of the of the written content. quality of the written written content. There There are several content. There are only are many corrections corrections needed on occasional mistakes on the Score: /10 needed on the the information used. information used. information used. Standards of More than half of the A few entries did not All, if not, most entries writing format(s) entries did not comply comply with the comply with the standards with the standards and standards and formats and formats given formats given throughout given throughout the throughout the course(s), the course(s), based on course(s), based on the based on the textbook(s). Score: /10 the textbook(s). textbook(s).
Portfolio and/or The submissions did not The submissions did not The submissions meet the e-portfolio’s meet the required meet the required required amount submission and minimum amount minimum amount instructed, and were timing thereof instructed, and/or the instructed, but were very handed in timely, showing submissions were given close to reaching it, good time management at a considerably later and/or the submissions and prioritizing on the time. were given very close to student/writer’s part. Score: /10 the due date or nearly afterwards.
Obama Ordered Hit-list of Targeted Individuals Worldwide to CYBER ATTACK, ISOLATE, FINANCIALLY RUIN the TARGETED INDIVIDUAL With Supporting Documents - Published by Debre Dupre in the Examiner on June 8, 2013