Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fractal Studies On Titanium-Silica Aerogels Using Smarter
Fractal Studies On Titanium-Silica Aerogels Using Smarter
ABSTRACT
Power-law scattering approximation has been employed to reveal the fractal structures of solid-state titanium-silica
aerogel samples. All small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) measurements were performed using 36 meters SANS
BATAN spectrometer (SMARTer) at the neutron scattering laboratory (NSL) in Serpong, Indonesia. The mass fractal
dimension of titanium-silica aerogels at low scattering vector q range increases from –1.4 to –1.92 with the decrease of
acid concentrations during sol-gel process. These results are attributed to the titanium-silica aerogels that are growing to
more polymeric and branched structures. At high scattering vector q range the Porod slope of –3.9 significantly down to
–2.24 as the roughness of particle surfaces becomes higher. The cross over between these two regimes decreases from 0.4
to 0.16 nm-1 with the increase of acid concentrations indicating also that the titanium-silica aerogels are growing.
1
fractal, Ds = 2 and scattering intensity I(q) decays as q-4 and incoherent scatterings from water were collected for
in Eq. (3) as the surface becomes independent of r. This 10, 12 and 10 hours, respectively. During the experiment,
behaviour is commonly called Porod’s law. For fractal the temperature was maintained at room temperature.
surface, Porod slopes between -3 and –4 are expected. At
large scattering vector q, the intensity I (q) for scattering RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
from a thin disk has slope of –2 and –1 from a thin rod, Figure 1 shows a typical power-law scattering profiles
Eq. (1). from silica aerogles which have two power-law regimes13.
At high q range or short-length, scattering from smooth
In this paper, we report the fractal structure change of particles results in a slope of –4, while at intermediate q
titanium-silica aerogels prepared by sol-gel process range the scattering slope is –1.93, representing a thin
method with various acid concentrations and then disk shape, describing the particle aggregation in a
analyzed the small-angle neutron scattering data as a polymeric structure by a mass-fractal morphology close
direct technique to determine the fractal dimension. to D ~ 2. It is consistent with Eqs. (1) and (3), with D = 2
and Ds = 2, respectively. However, at low q-range the
EXPERIMENT curve does not show the independent scattering on
The titanium-silica aerogels with various acid scattering vector q since the dimension of particle is
concentrations from 1 N to 1.75 N were synthesized with
larger than ξ and it is in uniform structure13.
sol-gel process method at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,
Malaysia[12]. The sample then was poured into 1 mm
thick quartz cell and then covered with other 1 mm thick
quartz cell as a sandwich with sample thickness of 1 mm.
4
10
The SANS experiments were performed using the 36
meter SANS-BATAN spectrometer (SMARTer) at the
neutron scattering laboratory (NSL) – BATAN in
Serpong, Indonesia. The rotational speed of the
mechanical velocity selector was adjusted to 5000 rpm
with tilting angle of 0° to generate neutron wavelength of
0.39 nm with the spread of 0.135. Three different
sample-to-detector distances of 1.5, 4 and 13 m have
been set up covering the scattering vector Q-range of
3
10
0.03 < q (nm-1) < 3. The length of collimation or sample- Figure 1 SANS profiles from pure silica aerogels were
to-source distance was set for 4 and 8 m. The exposure obtained in the wide scattering vector q-range.
time for each aerogel sample and each sample-to-
detector distance was 2 hours. The scattering data were Figure 2 shows the power-law scattering profiles from
corrected for empty cell as a background, electronic silica aerogels containing titanium as a function of acid
background as a noise, sample transmission and detector concentrations. A similar scattering profile with silica
efficiency using the SMARTer data reduction software. aerogles is shown from titanium-silica aerogel sample at
For data correction, empty cell, electronic background, the lowest acid concentration of 1 N, Figure 2a. The
2
change of slopes at high and intermediate q range is
10
related to changing of particle structures as the effect of
Intensity
4 4
10 10 1
10 -1.4
(a)
3 (b)
3
10 10 0
4 4
10 10
10
2 2
10 10-1
ensity
ensity
3 3
10
(c) (d)
10 10
Figure 2 SANS profiles from titanium-silica aerogels with various acid concentrations during sol-gel process (a) 1 N ;
(b) 1.25 N ; (c) 1.5 N and (d) 1.75 N. The slopes were determined by least square fitting
10
1 1
10-2 2 -1.
2 2
the acid concentration. The particles become rougher on REFERENCES
the surface as the slope decreases from -3.97 to -3.93,
while the aggregate has more elongated shape as the
magnitute of scattering intensity I(q) = q-1.5 compare to
that of the silica aerogels, I (q) = q-1.93.
CONCLUSION
An excellent performance in revealing the fractal
structures of titanium-silica aerogels has been
accomplished by SANS BATAN spectrometer
(SMARTer). Power-law scattering on titanium-silica
aerogels at high and intermediate q-range changes as a
function of acid concentrations. The acid concentration
affected the changing of fractal structure of aerogels
more rather than the impurities in titanium. Mass fractal
structures have been found with the dimension DM
between 1.42 and 1.92.
3
1
K. L. Yeung, N. Yao, S. Cao, US Patent 11/288,259, 29 November 2005; http://eetd.lbl.gov/ECS/aerogels/ satoc.htm
2
T. Woignier, J. Reynes, J. Phalippou and J.L. Dussossoy, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn. 19, 2000, 833-837.
3
I. Smirnova, Synthesis of silica aerogles and their application as a drug delivery system, PhD thesis, Technishen
Universitat Berlin, 2002; I. Smirnova, S. Suttiruengwong, W. Arlt, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 350 (2004), 54-60
4
Nappi, E., Nucl. Phys. B - Proceedings Supplements, 61, Supplement 2, 1998, 270-276
5
B. C. Dunn, et al. Appl. Catal. A 278 (2005) 233-238
6
B. B. Mandelbrot, Fractals, Form and Chance, Freeman, San Fransisco, 1977; D. Avnir, D. Farin, P. Pfeifer, Nature 308,
1984, 5956; P. Pfeifer, D. Avnir, J. Chem. Phys 79 (1983) 3558
7
J. E. Martin, A. J. Hurd, J. Appl. Cryst. 20 (1987) 61-78
8
F. Horkay, P. J. Basser, A. M. Hecht, E. Geissler, Polymer 46 (2005) 4242-4247
9
D. Sen, S. Mazumder, S. Tarafdar, J. Mater Sci. 37 (2002) 941-947
10
I. M. Miranda, F. M. A Margaca, J. Teixeira, J. Mol. Struc. 383 (1996) 271-276
11
P. G. Hall, R. T. Williams, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 104 (1985) 151-174; P. W. Schmidt, J. Appl. Cryst. 24 (1991) 414-
435.
12
Tan Chiar Fang, Master Thesis, Department of Physics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia, 2005.
13
D. W. Schaefer, K. D. Keefer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 2199-2202; C. I. Merzbacher, J. G. Barker, K. E. Swider, D. R.
Rolison, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 76 (1998) 57-69.